>gen 6.5
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /vp/ - Pokemon
You are currently reading a thread in /vp/ - Pokemon
>gen 6.5
>>25798601
And what if it does end up being gen 6.5?
>>25798636
/vp/ will be shut down
>>25798601
Yeah, I hated when ORAS became Gen 6.5 instead of sharing it's Megas with XY
>>25798636
Can you just call it Gen 6, then? Gen 6.5 sounds like shit and the whole argument is semantics anyway. I'd prefer saying Gen 7 if the games have new staters just to avoid the awkwardness of Gen 6 having two sets of new starters, but really I don't care if it's Gen 6 or Gen 7--I just can't get on board with people who say "Gen 6.5."
>>25798636
It won't. It can only ever be 6 or 7. And we all know it isn't going to be gen 6.
>>25798746
Gen "6.5" is basically "feminism"
A huge label being thrown around with no one agreeing on the definitions.
>>25798601
6.5 generation doesn't exist and never will. People need accept reality and move on. 6th generation of Pokémon is dead and gone.
>>25798783
>Gen "6.5" is basically "feminism"
So, cancer?
>>25800708
>not getting the point
Oh, I spotted the gen 7 fag.
>>25798601
another dumb frogposter
