>To evolve Pokémon, you have to catch the same species of Pokémon multiple times
>>25697534
As long as it has more than the original 151 though, I'm in.
>>25697589
Still not confirmed
TRASH BOYS
R
A
S
H
B
O
Y
S
>>25697596
>mfw it's only the originals
It'd be funny watching Game Freak trying to sell us new Pokemon while promoting a game that doesn't include said new Pokemon.
>>25697610
>mfw Niantic had every opportunity to make this great and is apparently just shoveling half thought up shit at us
>>25697534
>>25697610
This way GF can have its cake and eat it too.
Pokemon go for genwunners and sun and moon for people who actually still play pokemon.
I dont understand. Whats pogo?
>>25697939
Pokémon Go.
I think it's a neat mechanic actually. Especially if you have the same two Pokémon near your area. Gives you incentive on acknowledging their existence since you gotta catch em again.
>>25697884
>sun and moon for people who actually still play pokemon.
haha, you'd like it, wouldn't you?
>>25697971
>Go on vacation
>Catch a Poliwag
>Stuck with Poliwag forever because you don't have any locally
Great mechanic!
>>25697971
>I think it's a neat mechanic actually
What a fucking shill. You know you aren't forced to like everything with Pokemon in it.
>>25698003
You're damn right I would ;_;
>>25697884
It doesn't really make a lot of sense though.
Mobile gaming is a lot more popular with the tail end of the millennial generation than it is with genwunners and lapsed fans.
If anything the RBY vc releases would cater more to the lapsed fan/genwunner than it would the mobile gaming audience.
If they are trying to target the mobile gaming demo by exposing them to the first set of pokemon as a sort of gateway, I guess it works but its a high risk moderate/low reward situation.
>>25697971
>I think it's a neat mechanic actually
>neat mechanic actually
>neat
>actually
>think
>>25697534
So pretty much a copy of Digifuse.
Fucking hell
>>25697971
You cannot be serious.
