ITT: Pokemon that look much better in X/Y than they did previously. I wasn't sure on Druddigon before but its X/Y model really does it justice.
I think what pisses me off the most about it is that the appearance makes it seem like it should be a lot more powerful than it really is. IT should have been a legendary or pseudo imo
>>25696105
Can Druddigon fly? The wings looks so small.
>>25696199
Is it flying type?
can it learn fly?
then no
>>25696105
I thought Druddigon was pretty meh in Gen 5, but now it's probably my favourite Dragon-type and one of my favourites full stop. Cool design, great in battle, and just a bro in general.
>>25696105
Shiny Krookodile is one of the few shinies saved by 3D
>>25696199
I think they're more to make themselves look bigger when fighting prey or predators, or regulate their body temperature. Maybe they change colors in mating season like some real reptiles.
>>25696338
And shiny drapion was ruined
>>25696105
Really?
It just proved to me how gangly and long limbed the homely thing is. I think most Pokemon's models look horrendous when compaired to earlier iterations or their earlier sprites. Nidoking comes to mind.
Pikachu looks pretty good in 3D though. So do the Lat twins.
