>There are no evil Pokemon, just evil trainers that make them do evil things
>>25624263
Is this the face of evil, Anon?
>>25624376
>That design
>>25624388
Malamar is likely the best designed pocket monster from gen 6, you fucking bidoofus.
>>25624396
It looks like it was drawn in MS paint by a 5 year old.
>>25624400
>Wasting a two-pair on low quality bait
>>25624396
No Clawitzer is
>>25624400
can confirm
>>25624396
There is no reason why a floating squid should have feet like that.
>>25624428
It's not a squid it's a fictional monster that fits in your pocket that loosely resembles a squid. Horses shouldn't be on fire and turtles can't materialize hundreds to thousands of gallons of pressurized water inside their mouths either.
>>25624396
As the generations go by, I find myself liking more and more of the designs from each newer gen. As such, it has become rather hard for me to pick single favorites from each.
>>25624421
>Damn, I only have 10 minutes left to submit that final Pokemon design and all I have is a face!
>Fuck it, I'll wing it.
>>25624441
Shhh, Anon, ignore the people who don't understand what Pokemon are. They'll never understand and will forever live in their own little world of ignorance
>>25624263
Good and evil are relative.
>>25624427
>5 year old
Underage b&
>you will never catch Yveltal and force it to do good
>>25624544
Yveltal just wants hugs. Not its fault it's a creature of death and destruction. It didn't choose its lot in life
>>25624263
In japan dark type is called evil type so pokemon can be evil.
>>25624556
>paws
disgusting
>>25624263
but anon
>>25624388
>not liking supervillian upside-down squid
Screw it. If it doesn't make sense, ignore it. I refuse to believe these things don't have a will of their own.
>>25624620
There are no evil Pokémon.
>>25624544
Yveltal is neutral.
>>25624938
Pokémon exist in harmony with Humanity on the Pokémon World/Poké-Earth (Pokémon Earth).
There are no true evil Pokémon.
>>25624556
>paw pads and teeth on a pokemon that doesn't have them
>>25625009
They also can have any personality.
I mean, humans aren't inherently evil unless they choose to be seen that way
Black and White morality is practically an impossibility when somebody will sympathize with the black
>>25625017
Yes. There is no evidence of evil Pokémon outside the anime and Mystery dungeon Universe.
>>25624263
Anime Meowth contradicts that whole statement
>>25624263
Pretty sure Giratina is evil af
>>25625030
Antimatter.
what is evil but someone with an opinion that directly contradicts yours?
>>25624388
It's a taonius borealis
because good and evil are human constructs
>>25625030
Giratina and the Distortion World were created to be personifications of antimatter.
In HeartGold and SoulSilver, Cynthia also states this.
>>25625028
And so do the other pokemon by showing differing personalities to begin with. If they can have any personality, then they can be dickwads, psychopaths, and manipulative bastards, too.
>>25625040
Best squid coming through.
>>25625009
>B-but it was provoked
>Comes back 100 episodes later and fucking torments a flock of Pidgy for no reason
>>25625028
Junichi Masuda confirm that Anime series and the core-series of Pokémon video Games are parallel timelines and etc.
However, They sometimes make
cross-canon references to each other.
>>25624620
>lying on the internet
>>25625086
Junichi Masuda confirm that Anime series and the core-series of Pokémon video Games are parallel timelines and etc.
However, They sometimes make
cross-canon references to each other.
Anime series is alternative timeline.
>>25625027
>There is no evidence of evil Pokemon outside of the instances where Pokemon are being evil
>>25624630
>>25625011
>Paw pads
Huh. Didn't even notice that.
>Teeth
I ain't gonna complain about a monster (Even if it is bird-like) being depicted with teeth, nor am I going to let tiny little insignificant details ruin a cute image for me.
Pokemon are too stupid to be evil. They are like animals in DnD, TN.
>>25625133
>Alakazam has an IQ of 3000
Ekans and Koffing were full of shit and Meowth rightfully called bullshit.
>>25625027
You do realise that the statement of there being no evil Pokemon is from the anime right?
>>25624263
Pokemon are basically wild animals so this is pretty much true
they don't seem to have a moral compass at all
>>25625140
I can only assume that IQ tests are based entirely on spoons in the Pokemon universe.
For a more serious answer, some Pokemon likely have the capacity for moral judgement and as such could theoretically be evil. But even those are not predisposed to it.
>>25625133
I#m not falling for thise
>>25625161
Except from all the Pokemon that can literally talk right?
>>25625160
There is no Pokémon that's officially confirm to be truly evil.
>>25625161
This is so hilariously wrong it's unreal.
>>25625186
Except for Zoroark whose Japanese Pokedex entry calls it an "Evil Fox" pokemon.
I think of it the same way I think of dogs since I've worked with them a while
there's almost always a reason. mistreatment by trainers being the most common, never being taught what's ok or not, they're scared, etc. there are some who are just jerks and choose to be that way, but just about 98% actually have a reason
>>25625140
>>Alakazam has an IQ of 3000
>Believing this
It's hyperbole. Mewtist, don't bother, I'm leaving this thread.
>>25625194
There is no Pokémon that's officially confirm to be truly evil.
Provide otherwise please
>>25625198
Wrong Person.
>>25625176
I was being a bit silly and hyperbolic, but I do think people tend to present most Pokemon as being too smart. Certainly there are exceptions, but in the games, like the interactions with following Pokemon in HGSS, Pokemon act more like animals than people.
>>25625200
>Zoroark may be a combination of zorro (Spanish for fox) and dark, 悪 aku (evil), or arch- (prefix for "top" or "chief").
http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/Zoroark_(Pok%C3%A9mon)
>>25625198
That's inaccurate.
Alakazam has an IQ of 5000.
>>25625211
That's inaccurate.
Alakazam has an IQ that exceeds 5000.
>>25625211
Clearly says it exceeds 5000. You are wrong.
>>25625208
I said officially confirmed.
Types name means nothing, if you show no evidence of a evil Pokémon.
>>25625211
>Exceeds 5000
>>25625217
I texted before, I uploaded that image.
>>25625200
Screw official. It's all nonsense, I refuse to believe any of it.
>>25625221
Actually, I texted before, I uploaded that image.
>>25625220
>it doesn't count because I don't want it to
If you google "Evil Fox Pokemon" the first thing you'll get is Zoroark. They changed his thing to "Tricky Fox" in the US but in Japanese the Pokedex calls him an "Evil Fox".
There's no point in me trying to prove to you that pokemon can be evil because you'll just say it's not official, no matter what it is. Even though there were evil Pokemon in Mystery Dungeon.
>>25625234
Leave! I don't care about fanon information.
>>25625239
No Pokémon is officially confirm to be truly evil. Mew is called the new Species Pokémon but is it's Species new?
No. Because, Mew is the Ancestor of All Pokémon!!!
>>25625245
Well, you aren't getting anywhere with your so called canon because you can't even decide what that is, and you never will because it's all inconsistent.
>>25625198
>Hyperbole
>In an encyclopedia
>>25625264
I see, someone getting mad, cause they provide no evidence that Pokémon can be evil in the core-series of Pokémon.
>>25625255
No pokemon is officially confirmed to be good either. Why do you assume that pokemon are inherently good? How do you know they even follow the same moral compass as us?
>Mew is called the new Species Pokémon but is it's Species new?
It's called the New Species because it was a newly discovered species. Not that it was newly formed.
You type very pompously. Do you have Aspergers or is English not your first language?
>>25625277
It's not inclusive enough to qualify as an encyclopedia, and I doubt it would even qualify as a dictionary because it keeps changing the definition.
>>25625300
Newly discovered for several years by the time of b/w2?
>>25625300
Provide that Pokémon can be evil.
I've been waiting for the first true evil Pokémon to be confirm. Provide that Pokémon exist now.
>>25625319
Sure, wynnaut?
>>25625319
Actually, It was discover years ago before the settling of 1st generation of Pokémon.
>>25625319
Sure. I could believe that within the Pokemon world, Mew is one of the most recently discovered Pokemon.
Or are you seriously trying to tell me that there were six inhabited regions within close distance from Kanto, and nobody bothered to walk into a patch of grass?
>>25625331
Only if you can provide evidence that pokemon can be good. Because I've been waiting for the first true good Pokemon to be confirmed myself. But the only instances I've seen were of people forcing their pokemon to be good, and in Mystery Dungeon which doesn't count.
>>25625345
Still more time than what can be considered new.
>>25625356
Actually, I don't know, according to the games, everyone is dumber than a hydrogen atom, including the esteemed professor.
>>25625027
doesn't kyurem kill small children that are out at night or something?
that's pretty evil
>>25625390
Only if they are stupid enough to go to the giant chasm.
BTW, i love Lacunosa and its lore.
>>25625390
Hypno literally abducts babies and rapes them.
>>25625390
kyurem is neutral.
Kyurem eat Pokémon and Human a like.
Yveltal is neutral.
>>25625423
Hypno is neutral.
>There are no Pokémon that dislike humans... Only humans that dislike Pokémon... We Pokémon are especially shunned... But Trainer always treats me as a friend and partner...
>>25624376
>Psychic Pokemon are generally the smartest Pokemon on average.
>Dark Pokemon have a tendency towards cruelty, or at least extreme territorial behavior.
>Combine the former with the latter and you get a Pokemon that is intelligent enough to know that evil is wrong, but delights in it anyway.
I was not prepared for anime Malamar.
>>25625440
Jellicent sinks ships and Cacturne eats lost travelers in the desert.
Malamar deliberately hypnotizes people and the Litwick line burns away at peoples' souls.
>>25625455
>Musketeers.
>>25625473
Eating is not evil.
>>25625477
Killing innocent lives is evil. That's why Kyurem is seen as evil.
>>25625473
>Cacturne eats lost travelers in the desert
Nigga we don't know what the fuck they do to lost travellers, all the pokedex says is that it waits until the traveller is too exhausted to continue moving.
>>25625478
Eat or being eaten.
It is the cycle of life.
>>25625493
I bet you're a vegan.
>>25625478
Kyurem Eating Pokémon and Human are not evil.
It is the cycle of life.
>>25625505
You're a terrible troll.
>>25625498
No. I'm serous.
>>25625509
Some Pokémon Eat fish Pokémon, that's not evil.
>>25625512
No you aren't.
All you've been doing is responding to all of my points with vapid nothings. You're just going "Pokemon aren't evil because they aren't".
I've given you examples of pokemon being evil in the form of the villains in Mystery Dungeon, but apparently that doesn't count. I've shown you examples of Pokemon harming humans and Pokemon alike, but that doesn't count. Meanwhile if a Human hunts a pokemon for food, the humans are the bad ones.
If you aren't a troll or a foreigner, you're a sufferer of Aspergers and the contrary facts are negatively stimming you.
>>25625535
Mystery Dungeon is not part of the core-series of Pokémon.
>>25625558
And Pokemon is not Capsule Monsters, or any monster catching game before it.
>>25625558
Just because you don't like it doesn't mean it doesn't count.
It's part of the franchise. There is no "core-series" of Pokemon. You just like the versions more so you think that's the objective standard. But it's not.
>>25625574
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hmzDL1l3Fag
Every game in that video is part of the core-series of Pokémon.
>>25625574
Do most people actually think of the mystery dungeon games as canon? They are clearly in a parallel world of some sort.
Imagine Red ending up on an island society of Pokemon where all of them talk and live happy little lives with houses and everything.
>>25625572
I don't understand you.
Why are you here?
>Even the most intelligent pokemon attack random 10 year olds who are passing by just for the hell of it
>not evil
>>25625594
It doesn't matter, whether the premise of this board is solely to shitpost, or there's supposed to be discussion going on, the result is the same. I did my job by disagreeing with you and also stating pokemon is not limited to the games. If you actually wanted to have discussion, then you wouldn't be limited to the games, would you?
>>25625622
It isn't like they kill you. They just are bloodthirsty sons of bitches.
>>25625622
You read didn't the Sinnoh region myths, didn't you?
>>25625641
No. Because, they're all different canons (parallel universes).
>>25625670
And why exactly do the others ignore the main series, then? If the games don't matter to them, then they don't matter at all.
>>25625681
I don't know and I don't care.
Why does only the core series count? It seems like every discussion on this board is a matter of constantly moving goalposts. I've seen people insist that gameplay isn't canon, only the Pokedex, and others insist the Pokedex isn't canon, and Pokemon are only capable of what they accomplish in the game itself. Can't we have a conversation along the lines of "Well, Pokemon are not evil in [one part of the franchise] but they are capable of evil in [this part of the franchise]"?
>>25626205
Because the core series is pokemon. That's what it is. Everything else is just spin offs.
I don't want to have to explain why Trozei doesn't fit into the canon when people start telling me that Pokemon can survive decapitation.
>>25626432
If nothing else has to follow the games, then I won't either.
>>25626432
>Because the core series is pokemon.
It's all Pokemon. There are multiple canons.
>>25624427
>mamalam.jpg
>>25626205
1. These people have to insist on their way.
2. It's incredibly vague no matter what. The games have contradictory information, the anime is contradictory. The spinoffs are the only thing in which I'm certain for all of them that have that sort of thing that pokemon can be evil. I have no knowledge of the manga, someone else will have to verify that.
