Would you buy?
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /vp/ - Pokemon
You are currently reading a thread in /vp/ - Pokemon
Would you buy?
off topic but there seems to be this misconception that all Ditto keep their same face whenever they transform.
Only one ditto had that abnormality, though.
But yeah idk maybe if I had the money? They're pretty freakin' cute.
>>25536906
ditto
>>25536906
>S&M MAKES DITTO FACE VARIANTS FOR EVERY POKEMON IN THE DEX
>I USE TRANSFORM ON EVERYTHING
>>25535293
>no Torchic
I'll pass
>>25535293
Sure.
Maybe Charmander, Bulbasaur, or Clefairy.
If they made a Dittoed Quagsire, would they even need to make it different?
>>25536906
>misconception
It's official merch, you moron
>>25535293
>hurr let's just make the standard puppets but don't bother sewing an actual face
>brilliant!
>>25536906
These are official, so I guess it's canon, just not an in game thing
>>25537873
They're cuter this way
>>25537908
It's just lazy, they're quite obviously trying to milk some easy cash from nostalgiafaggots.
>>25536906
Pretty much everything but the games does it for all ditto though.
>>25537939
Under that logic, what exactly ISNT milking?
>New merch of pokemon X
>"Hurr theyre just trying to milk fans of X"
>New Pokemon game
>"Hurr theyre just trying to milk people who want a new game"
>>25536906
Ditto's ORAS pokedex entry...
"Ditto rearranges its cell structure to transform itself into other shapes. However, if it tries to transform itself into something by relying on its memory, this Pokémon manages to get details wrong."
so yeah... canon
>>25537873
>>25537939
You realize that all of these are machine stitched, so it really isn't any less work than regular faces, right?
They wanted to make money off the cute factor of ditto, but I don't see where lazy comes in.
