Golem
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /vp/ - Pokemon
You are currently reading a thread in /vp/ - Pokemon
Today we shall talk about Golem.
How do you feel about its design?
How do we make it better for battle?
Goat 3,2,1..
give it a mega. rock/electric with levitate
>>24764576Only good for Sucker Punch.
>>24764592
>tfw Brolem only learns Sucker Punch via gen 4 tutor
>tfw we will never know the joys of sweeping with a tournament legal Sturdy Rock Polishing, EdgeQuaking, Sucker Punching Golem holding Weakness Policy
>>24764592
UOL
>Design
Wonderful. Elegant. Totally sexy.
>Better for battle
No. Golem is not supposed to be a very good Pokemon. He can Explode, and a lot of people have a shiny one. That's all Golem is for. Just be glad he looks cool, that's more than many Pokemon can ask for.
>How do you feel about its design?
It's design is badass, but I always found the evolution really weird. Goes from a rock creature with 4 arms to a lizard/dinosaur in a rockshell
>How do we make it better for battle?
It already has a niche in Automotize Sturdy Weakness Policy sweeping. And altough it's outclassed in doubles it got stuff like Wide Guard
How about a Mega that goes Ground/Fire and loses defense but gains speed?
HP: 80 -> 80
ATK: 120 -> 160
DEF: 130 -> 80
SP ATK: 55 -> 65
SP DEF: 65 -> 75
SPE: 45 -> 135
Abilty: Flame Body
Not so fast
>STILL liking Golem
U want to die nig?
>STILL liking golem
>>24764591
Design would be awful mate.
