Is there any scientifical explanation concerning why some pokémon species have an unbalanced gender ratio?
The real reason is to make some Pokemon harder to breed and thus rarer. If you want a lore reason there isn't one. But in real life there are many animals with unbalanced sex ratios so it's not strange.
>>24754808
Arceus has good taste and doesn't want women to be so ugly they look like men.
Which explains why shit like Kangaskhan is thankfully endangered. Reminder the "Mega" is shit as well and lazy.
>>24754808
Only the lion pokemon has science behind it.
>Most lions are female
>The ones that aren't are male, and thus, respected amongst the commune
>yfw there's more females than males in the lion world, hence skewered gender
checkmate atheists.Or they just want to make the cool big-maned lion that much harder to get. Same for breeding starters, Eevees, Togepi for some reason, and maybe Lucario and Zoroark.
>>24754814
>harder to breed
>when Ditto exists
>>24754823
Not Arceusism. Mewism.
feminism and masculinity nonsense.
Gender selection is the attempt to control the Gender of the Pokémon offspring to achieve a desired Gender.
Artificial Gender Selection and Climate Change?
>>24755014
Keep. Bitching.
A certain amount of species tend to work that way, an example of it: having less females but an astounding amount of males, resulting on females copulating with more than one mate, up to a big number (Charadriiformes).
It could be a result of their evolutionary genes, needing less of X to keep living, sometimes it could be because of environment changes, like humans making the ecosystem go nuts because of deforestation (of course, that's just an example), or because nature fucked up and it became that way.
In the end, is probably mostly due to being in disadvantage by having a 1:1 (so, adaptability/evolution). In fact, I would guess that they can keep living exactly because of that: Sometimes less is better for them.
>>24755071
Gender War leads to End of life for gender base lifeforms.
