Which generation is the most misunderstood?

>>24733897
Gen IV

>>24733897
Two or four maybe.

>>24733897

Thanks, doc.

>>24733897
id say just gen 2. its been left behind and out shined by its senior.

>>24733897
>misunderstood
Please elaborate. Do you mean underappreciated? In that case I'd say III.

I'd say all of them. No gen is perfect, and saying otherwise is deluding yourself. Each gen has its flaws.

File: 250px-Pokemon_Emerald_boxart_EN-US.jpg (1MB, 1473x1475px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

1MB, 1473x1475px

>>24737157
>Each gen has its flaws

>>24733897
Gen 1. Everyone hates, "genwunners," because they enjoy nostalgia. What's wrong with nostalgia? I like living in 1999. But seriously, I think the real reason early generations of Pokemon are misunderstood is because there was a big stylistic change in Gen 3.

File: EeWWKIZ.jpg (36KB, 642x504px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

36KB, 642x504px

>>24737215
>Emerald
You're only proving their point further.

>>24733897
All of them

Probably Gen 2.

It was supposed to be a sequel, not an independent generation like the others. It wasn't really a good design choice, but beta Rocket and the scarcity of new Pokemon do fit into that context.