Archived threads in /vp/ - Pokemon - 1246. page
- Home
- Board: /vp/ - Pokemon
- Reading: Archived threads in /vp/ - Pokemon - 1246. page
May 10th confirmed new sun and moon info
you're 9 hours late
http://www.gamespot.com/articles/heres-when-new-pokemon-sunmoon-details-will-be-rev/1100-6439553/#ftag=YHF6738a5f
>>26185917
No shit. You are 13 hours too late
I don't care if you're an owlfag or a denialfag, and I'm not trying to start an argument thread. I just want to know, if this thing is fake or real, why do people hate it's design? It's super cute and even if it looked shitty it's a first form, it's not like most players keep their starter unevolved anyway. So why all the hate? If it's real, cool we have a cute little owl starter, if not it's just a really cute fakemon.
Only edgy try hards trying to fit in to "m-muh 4chan community culture" hate the designs of these starters. They're perfectly fine designs and I wouldn't be surprised if they're real.
People probably have just seen them too much so they're annoyed.
>>26185820
>I'm not trying to start an argument thread.
But you are, indeed.
Nobody thinks this thing is real and nobody wants it to be real. 6.5/10
>>26185854
>Nobody thinks this thing is real and nobody wants it to be real.
You realize what you just said is text book definition of denial, right faggot?
Why;_;
Post your bros that are a pain to use in game, but you use them anyways.
>>26185765
I use Dustox too, excelent againts serperior an Shiled Dust is very useful.
>>26185765
I used dustox on my oras run, its pretty good even without any quiver dances up
>>26185765
>tfw most of my bros aren't hard to use because they're steel
favorite Pokemon from 650+
Tyrantrum
Kyogre
Heliolisk
Hey guys, just a quick question
Does anybody knows why we didn't get a gen6 pixie? I know a lot of people say it's Hoopa (pic related) but he doesn't fit the all 100 stats.
>>26185441
And let's be honest, the "eyes for 2 more rings" is a bullshit point
>Muh patterns.
MUH PATTERNS
>Scrafty cannot learn Sucker Punch nor Beat Up
Explain that bullshit, also moves that Pokemon should have but don't thread.
>>26185414
>Zangoose can't learn cut
>Hitmonchan can't learn Sucker Punch but Lee and Top can (I know it's Surprise Attack in Japanese but still)
>Persian gets Petal Dance
>Sableye gets Octozooka
Bonus: Shaymin-Sky reverts to it's normal forme if frozen.
>>26185395
GUYS DONT REPLY
I don't remember this part of the anime.
New meme
>>26185352
i don't get this meme
>>26185352
O shit whaddup
So, i'm a south american fag who can't get even remotely close to a Game Stop or whatever other store giving away this event, so...
Could some of you clone one, trade with me, so I could clon the shit out of it and make proper distro here?
>>26185108
No.
Riber puto te fuiste a la B no bancaste los trapos te vamos a correr
if you can clone it, you can inject it yourself
Does Fearow deliver babies in the Pokemon World?
>>26185101
No, cause. Fearow is not omnipotent, omniscience and omnipresent.
>>26185101
No. other Pokémon do it.
Good, bad, what do you reckon?
Great in Type Reflector when paired with Dragon or Water.
Either one would be a really cool typing for a Mega
Stole Sableye's gimmick.
>>26185880
Spiritomb stole it first.
fucking seriously?
>>26184979
Which one of these is his Joltik?
>>26184979
what fresh hell is this now?
I want Rabbish
Remember when people thought fairy types would be cool fae creatures but then all we got were abominations like this?
>>26184856
>implying it isn't cool
>>26184874
I'm not looking at it through autism goggles so I can't say that it is.
Remember how Fairy apologists still insist it's the Magic or Mythological Creature type when literally the same gen gave us a Psychic-type wizard and Psychic-type djinn?
It's the Waifu type. DEAL WITH IT, NERDS
when pikachu eats an earthquake it becomes a picachu
>>26184799
Not funny at all
Just like sex, I don't get it
>he doesn't know about pikaman
Underage people should not be on this board.
Look at how smart serebii is XD
>>26184739
pomf pls
>a post from literally 13 years ago
>>26184739
I for one think its a good sign of accuracy when someone has to go back over a decade just to get more than a couple of mistakes.
