>Arena Commander Current Version
https://robertsspaceindustries.com/comm-link/transmission/14486-Arena-Commander-102-Released
>Arena Commander Manual v1.0
https://robertsspaceindustries.com/media/hwb5x45eghhelr/source/AC-Manual-1-0-V6.pdf
>FAQ
http://pastebin.com/fcf25Vi9
>Arena Commander performance tweaks and FAQ
http://pastebin.com/QRWNvEVD
>Jump Point Downloads
http://pastebin.com/Cd9wQ9YB
>Jump Point Current Issue
https://robertsspaceindustries.com/media/dbxfddd9hlpgkr/source/JumpPoint_03-01_Jan_15_Riding-Herd.pdf
>Letter from the Chairman ($64 - $66 million)
https://robertsspaceindustries.com/comm-link/transmission/14354-Letter-From-The-Chairman-Multi-Crew-Ship-Systems
>December Monthly Report
https://robertsspaceindustries.com/comm-link/transmission/14420-Monthly-Report-December
>PAX South Town Hall Videos
Keynote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U2GmLvwtnCk
Panel 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XHf2HA37okM
Panel 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=phq0p-ojxcM
Panel 3: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AGUhw9Lw1yY
PU Idea Forum: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=enI2FZyzi6E
>Latest News
10 for the Chairman 52: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uZm3iwplH_s
Meet the Devs 10: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9mhyO26bVVw
Meet the Devs 11: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lX0e28aHoTE
Around the Girth 30: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W4v7BHAqDuw
Mobiglas Design Post: https://robertsspaceindustries.com/comm-link/transmission/14466-Design-MobiGlas
Comm-Link Schedule: https://forums.robertsspaceindustries.com/discussion/229056
I forgot about new links, my bad.
January Monthly Report:
https://robertsspaceindustries.com/comm-link/transmission/14481-Monthly-Report-January
>>94069484
Are you gonna post them one link per post or something? Missing the shield one for example.
>using an ED review as the OP image
This is going to be a great thread, you fucking cunt.
https://forums.robertsspaceindustries.com/discussion/229410/star-citizen-s-most-hated-ship-poll
>Dat OP Image
>>94069583
Trying to sweep things under the rug as usual, Ben?
>>94069686
>aurora winning
just proves RSI has shit taste
>>94069808
How can anybody hate that shit? It's hardly even there.
>>94069808
>hate aurora and shitdeemer
>check RSI
>they agree
Nope, you're the one with bad taste.
>inb4 Bennett Ring getting doxxed by angry Star Citizen fans
>you're sick of paying hundreds for spaceship models that don't have a universe to fly in
He's right, you know.
>>94069583
Oh Ben, stay cool. Why are you always so sweaty when sitting beside Sandi?
>>94069926
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4qMpaK-crCI
Remember that people that pay $80 for weapons are claiming to be better than you on RSI every dayand people believe them
>>94069961
>>94069961
Welp, I was too late.
I updated the OP and everything too.
>>94069934
what's to hate about aurora?
it's a cheap single seat ship that looks like a personal spacecraft and not a special snowflake ricer spaceplane like the mustang. and LN has four guns mounted in non-retarded spots
fucking useless space yacht 890 jump
shitty oversized 300 series..
>>94070089
Yeah, because Elite totally didn't do the same ;)
>>94070106
Because Sandi is a Robot. She might as well not even be a woman. Just listen to how she reads those headlines.
>>94070165
It didn't. You just paid for an alpha/beta and got the whole game. You didn't get to spend $2500 on ships.
>>94070142
It's crap, $20-30 for a starter ship. Garbage.
>$60 to haul crates from A to B
You can have your universe back, thanks.
>>94070089
At least there is fun stuff to do in SC instead of you know... Sitting on your ass and refueling your ship constantly.
>>94070142
Thick cockpit frames maybe?
>>94070336
>It's crap
No shit, it's a starter ship.
>>94070336
>It's crap, $20-30 for a starter ship. Garbage.
wow the p2w is real
this is how RSI really thinks
>>94069686
>Herald hated more than the 300 series
Were they expecting a Drake ship to be anything but barebones?
>>94069583
It's not an ED review. It's a scam citizen lel.
>>94070430
It's only gaming magazine in Australia ;)
>facebook com/PCPowerPlay/photos/a.279430475463294.64327.126400404099636/787447634661573/?type=1
>Well, some of us love it, some of us don't I don't think Dan's invested in it, but Ben Mansill's heavily invested, and I've (this is David, by the way, certainly got a starship. But Bennett's not so fond.
>>94070405
>asks me why i don't like it
>tell him its crap
>he says obviously
Well... there you go.
>>94070657
I didn't ask you shit, and it being crap isn't a good reason to not like a starter ship. All starter ships are crap. So is the Mustang, but nobody hates that because it's crap.
>>94070657
because it's retarded to hate a ship just for being smaller/cheaper than other ships
and it's not even outclassed by any of the other single seaters released so far
I wrecked hornets and 300 series with 4 good guns close together
>>94070807
>crap isn't a good reason to not like a starter ship.
Take your stupid wrong opinions elsewhere.
>>94070807
If anything, the Mustang should be more hated because it's powercreep that made the Aurora garbage by being superior in every way.
Posting best company
>>94070657
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=opMGRIpUbO8
>>94070861
So you really think a startership should be good? Really?
>>94070874
I disagree. I think it should be hated because it's a stupid design. Can't really say how it compares personally.
>>94070897
>tfw no best company weapons yet
>>94071024
Aurora is good, actually. For what its intended to be.
I really don't know why you guys don't get that
>>94071024
>So you really think a startership should be good? Really?
Ask the mustang. The design of this game is retarded.
>>94071046
>buying weapons
>>94070897
Weeb pride galaxy wide!Wasn't that company based in a city that's supposedly Japanese but has a really Chinese name?
>>94071163
It's based in Tokyo, ya putz.
>>94071094
Well yeah, I thought it was obvious that I was talking about the capabilities in general.
>>94071126
>Ask the mustang
Mustang isn't a hauler.
>>94071308
And why would you buy a space sim where you can PVP and blow shit up and explore, just to haul a few cargo boxes around to grind credits? Autistic.
>>94070657
He also wrote this shit 8 years ago for IGN.
>http://www.ign.com/articles/2006/12/11/wii-a-hardcore-gamers-perspective
He's a hardcore gamer guys, watch out! ;)
>>94071308
Well its capabilities in general aren't that bad anyway.
Largest cargo hold of any single seater, has an exploration variant so potential range probably won't be an issue, it seems to be a solid ship
>>94071308
Toss the cargo container on it.
Now it's got equivalent storage as the Aurora.
>>94071389
>SC = AC
If you think blowing up random small ships will get you as much money as selling a load of pricey cargo, you're up for a big surprise.
Did i get banned for saying scam citizen?
>>94071308
>aurora
>hauler
fucking what
How far does the Mustang outclass the Aurora?
What weapon mounts do Mustang's get? Auroras are just limited to two size 2 class 1s and a missile mount, the LN has two size 3 class 1s right?
>>94071424
Pretty much for everything except those things you listed the Aurora's outclassed by some other single seater, which is what I meant. It's not totally utter shit, but still crap in comparison.
>>94071495
Cool.
Doesn't make it a hauler.
>>94071561
An entry level hauler, but still a hauler.
>>94071495
>Now it's got equivalent storage as the Aurora.
Mustang can't haul big container like Aurora.
>>94071561
Right now Aurora IS starter for happy merchants, if you didn't know. That will probably change once Reliant is out.
>>94071561
Comes with a cargo pod.
>>94071705
>Right now Aurora IS starter for happy merchants, if you didn't know. That will probably change once Reliant is out.
Wasn't that supposed to just be more defence? Then you'd have the Aurora that has mid defence and mid weaponry and decent cargo, the Mustang with speed (and weaponry?) but no cargo/defence, and the Reliant with defence but not weapons/cargo.
>>94071705
LN is for police patrol and is bretty gud
hauling a tiny amount of goods is pretty pointless when the next tier can carry like 10 times as much
>>94070132
No worries. If it's still up, we'll use that one next.
>>94071840
It's MISC, so I assume it will be able to haul more, but will be slower and less armed compared to Aurora.
>>94072029
>Slower than the Aurora
so completely still?
>>94071840
>Reliant
>not cargo
>ship by MISC
>not cargo
>>94072029
I guess that could work as well, with the Aurora just sitting in the middle.
>>94070106
Of course I'm not Ben, I was exhibiting a human emotion.
>>94072095
I just thought it was the odd one out, since I didn't recall anything about cargo being in its description.
>>94072095
its main advantage is having a second seat. So if any balance exists it should have less cargo than Aurora. Or utterly shit combat capabilities.
>>94072272
No reason for a pure-hauler that can't fight to have a RIO seat, though is there
>>94072367
Active Tetris Management.
>>94072459
Freelancer can fight enough to have a variant based around fighting
>>94072615
Freelancer isn't around the same price of an Aurora either.
>>94072459
>tetris
I want tetris mini-game for cargo management. You rotate and place 3D figures to maximize space efficiency.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NmCCQxVBfyM
>MFW sexboots finally arrive
http://youtu.be/rVjFOwyy06g?t=1m17s
>>94072778
>sexboots
Sounds kinky.
>>94072778
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNUtRF_4p_Q&app=desktop
Holy fucking shit
>>94073502
still better than the shitdeemer
>>94073502
Those engines look horrible, that thing would fall in pieces trying to take off in the atmosphere.
>>94073502
>Most of the front is empty cockpit
I see they've taken inspiration from the Constellation
>>94073502
>yet another massive, multi-deck glass cockpit on the front of the hull.
Is this how CIG hopes to prevent ramming?
>>94073771
>trying to fly anything that isn't an airplane or a rocket in atmosphere
>>94073502
>literally nothing on the lower deck
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UVnCr4nvHys
Here is another view
>>94073827
>I see they've taken inspiration from the Constellation
HURR DURRR
>>94073502
>>94074216
Original design, do not steal.
>>94074497
>the joke
>your head
whoosh
>>94073502
For all it's faults I'm still impressed.
But I guess I just want to see more big ships in the game.
>>94074497
>>94074615
And that just looks like a fucking Firefly but with four engines.
>>94076348
>shitting on the only good thing in the movie
Please. It's not nearly as ugly and utilitarian as Firefly-class.
>>94076617
>Please. It's not nearly as ugly and utilitarian as Firefly-class.
That's just the paint scheme. Overall shape is the same, although I didn't see that those two thrusters were on another swivel.
>>94076617
I like that ship though.
https://forums.robertsspaceindustries.com/discussion/230981
>This week kick starts a new fly free system that we've implemented which every other week you'll get access to a different ship or series of ships to try out!
>>94078092
>We're delaying AC bux as long as humanly possible!
Yeah thanks CIG, can't wait for everyone to have access to 6 Omni IVs
![jason-friday-the-13th[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/hvHyYuX.jpg "jason-friday-the-13th[1].jpg")
>>94078092
>Friday February 13th
>Design Post: Arena Commander Credits
oh boy
>>94078092
>Friday February 13th
>- Design Post: Arena Commander Credits
About fucking time.
>>94078368
>>94078342
Design post doesn't guarantee implementation for a long ass time, but at least we know its comingSoon
>>94078486
I'm mostly just interested in knowing how it will work. I'm okay with it taking a while still, not like I'm actually playing it anyway.
>>94078092
>RSI museum
Could somebody post the list with all javelin owners again? I forgot to copy the names.
https://forums.robertsspaceindustries.com/discussion/230981/comm-link-schedule-week-of-february-9th/p1
>This week kick starts a new fly free system that we've implemented which every other week you'll get access to a different ship or series of ships to try out!
>We want the league of legends audience
>>94078668
Why do you care?
>>94078769
They did it like 4 times already.
>>94079016
You can't answer one question in a poll and leave the other blank, genius
>>94078769
^ This, my friends, illustrates perfectly how you fucking infants can never be satisfied with anythingI lied when I called you my friends
>>94079075
>are you going to be a pirate?
>yes
>no
Pirates only: will you kill pods? Don't vote if you voted no to the above question. Only vote if you will be a pirate.
>yes
>no
Genius.
>>94079149
>anonymous
>friends
>>94079016
Why would you kill the pod when you can sell it into slavery
>>94079179
And?
>>94079179
yeah, no, you can't make it work that way. You need to answer all the questions.
>>94079179
YOU LITERALLY CANNOT ANSWER ONLY ONE QUESTION IN A POLL. YOU CAN'T SUBMIT UNTIL YOU'VE ANSWERED ALL THE QUESTIONS.
>>94079307
Then:
[Poll] Don't vote if you are not a pirate.
If you are going to be a pirate, will you kill pods?
>yes
>no
Fixed, genius.
