"FAST LIKE A NASCAR" EDITION
A thread for all vehicle simulation games: racing sims, flight sims, train sims, submarine sims, tank sims, anything else sims which do not have enough traffic to sustain their own independent generals.
Extra attention grabbing search terms for example welcome sims
/fsg/ /dcsg/ /fsxg/ /bmsg/ /shg/ /rofg/ /etsg/ /il2g/ /lfsg/ /tsg/
/fsg/ Steam Group:
http://steamcommunity.com/groups/flightsimgeneral
/fsg/ TeamSpeak:
ts.artificialanimation.com:7997
Or whatever is on the group's profile
BMS download links
https://mega.nz/#!0BlTkazA!VUwoKAzavtJ3qIUy7lEF8D8MFjbI_Si-r6nwC3wQZYQ
https://www.mediafire.com/folder/54569phfy8au7/BMS4.33_setup
http://www.e-haf.org/PublicFTP/320/BMS_4.33/Falcon_BMS_4.33_U1_Setup.zip
Planefag pastebin:
http://pastebin.com/Zb0U61in
Silent Hunter 3 pastebin:
http://pastebin.com/jNSvhFfY
Dangerous Waters pastebin:
http://pastebin.com/qvxk755r
FPSchazly's Dangerous Waters tutorials:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLOSvzqNmdX71x2COOyM-p2qHIpRNOvpGQ
Repository of various aviation related material:
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B3EQDvufMNdeTUh4SE9WV0txa0E&usp=drive_web
>Example of welcome sims:
Falcon BMS
DCS World
Rise of Flight
IL-2
Combat Helo
Microsoft Flight Simulator
X-Plane
Euro truck sim
Assetto Corsa
rFactor 2
Live for Speed
SAM Simulator
Steel Beasts Pro
Steel Armor: Blaze of War
Enemy Engaged: Comanche vs Hokum
Silent Hunter
Train Simulator
Farming Simulator 2015
>Example of non-welcome games:
Arm* 3
Ac* Combat
W*r Thunder
World of ____
>>145867164
why did you fags let it die?
first for OPS
B-M-P
wew
bmp
REALER
>tfw will never be a real fast jet pilot
I might just kill myself
>>145867302
impressive
Will there be DCS ops today?
Was that campaign mission a custom made one? It looked quality
>>145870472
yes and maybe
>mfw i take off and i dont know where to go and i dont see anything on the ground or in the air
We should all fly under the names of famous NASCAR drivers desu
>>145872074
>famous people
>NASCAR
???
This is the DCS community, there is nothing wrong with the game at all!
When will delusional idiots kill themselves?
Is it just me or are Russian jets retardedly overcomplicated?
Anyone know if custom colors actually work in Cliffs of Dover with Team Fusion? They don't seem to change anything so I'm not sure if they're broken or I'm just using aircraft where they don't have any effect.
>>145872998
It's less that Russian jets are overcomplicated and more that Western jets tend to have more things handled for the pilot. They're not making things more complex, it's just they haven't really simplified much.
>>145874924
Also, when new features are added to US planes, often times the cockpits are completely redesigned, and the aircraft is given a new model letter.
When Russians add new features often times they'll just bash it together. Just look at how countermeasure dispensers are installed on the MiG-21, they re-used the JATO ignition circuit.
>>145872998
I would rank the complexity like this
Hard>soft
A-10c>MiG-21>WW2 stuff>F5>mirage>baby cliffs
Are these SU-24's or Tornado's?
https://youtu.be/2Qg4ouwpxH8?t=12m39s
>>145877104
forgot pic
>>145877104
>>145877292
>>145876387
>F-5>Mirage
I don't know much about the mirage but are you telling me that a gen4 is less complex than a gen3?
Is there any more efficient way to make use of your rockets and bombs in the Su-25? Each pass I can only nail 1 or 2 targets, it seems I'm either missing or outright failing to damage the rest.
>>145878012
"Splash damage" against ground targets in dcs has been borked for the longest of times, you usually have to hit pretty much right on top of whatever you're aiming at in order to do significant damage, even if you're dropping heavier bombs like fab-500s.
As for rockets, it all depends on what kind of targets and how close they are to eachother.
An entire convoy of apcs or lighter can be wiped in a single pass with S-8OFPs.
>fukkkk, only got enough money to spare for a single module before the 20th
>can't decide between M2K or F-5
>kinda want to put off gen4 multi-role until F/A-18 appears
>I am kinda put off of M2K as I don't want to learn French or memorize foreign symbols just to fly/deploy weapons properlywill it actually be worth learning/memorizing symbols?
Is this a dumb move? What to do?
>>145881261
it's not even symbols. just basic french
>>145877757
While I think that specific example anon gave is a bad one (F-5 is a very simple plane, and was stylistically designed to be that way), look at the cockpit(s) of something like an F-4 to see why people would say that a 3rd gen fighter is more complex than a 4th. Shit was getting so complicated, so fast, that it became common practice to have a second guy just to operate the radar and weapons.
By the time 4th generation fighters started really coming into their own (with planes like F-15C, F-16C, Su-27S, MiG-29S, etc), computers had caught up to the complexity and were starting to automate a lot of what you needed a second pilot for.
That's why I think 3rd generation fighters and late 2nd gen are so interesting. They were the awkward transitional period between analog systems with steam gauges and increasingly complex electronic radars, weapons, and aircraft design.
>>145881905
Which second gen aircraft used radars and other complex systems?
>>145881261
There's a modded English pit available. The only things left in French would be the HUD, and almost all of that is numbers anyway.
The biggest hurdle I've found with the Mirage is that it's that procedures and quirks change every patch because it's still being worked on. I never know if something is broken or stupid because that's just how it's supposed to be, or if it's something RAZBAM hasn't finished yet.
ops when?
>>145882134
I was thinking specifically of the F-106 and the couple other big radar interceptors of its day, but now I remember that generation argument of the other day and don't care to go down that road again.
Quality sim.
![ef39028139[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/pMFaLJN.jpg "ef39028139[1].jpg")
CA ops when?
>>145882214
>>145881842
I see. But is it worth a buy? Or should I wait for F/A-18 for gen4 multi-role and enjoy F-5E's simplicity for now?
>>145884775
While the Mirage is multi-role, it can only carry dumb bombs and rockets, along with GBU-12s which need to be buddy lased.
That being said I would say the Mirage is definitely worth a buy.
>>145884775
Gods plane in French form desu lad
>>145886532
rip dale earnhardt
>>145886276
>mfw i cant dodge a sam from 10 nm away
>>145884223
You must re-install your game because nothing is wrong with dcs, it's your game. You'll be banned from DCS OPS until you provide screenshots of your DCS folder.
>>145884775
I'm having more fun with the mirage than with any module before
But I am semi novice/amateur at this stuff.
Learned to startup, take off, radar lock and shoot stuff with radar missiles in only a couple hours
>>145884775
I bought it last week and I fucking love it m8
>>145886532
>what a tough and bouncy plane
>>145884775
Mirage feels like an F-15 without amraams, if that's what you want then buy it. It's still very much wip but it gets huge updates every patch.
>>145888783
And it can do some bomb and rocket stuff, unlike F15
>>145889492
F-15 actually does have bombs but only in 2.0.
>>145889804
Lol why did you turn off nosewheel steering?
>buy mirage
>zero tutorials
wew
>>145889776
I wish they would make a full fidelity F-15E and the F/A-18 can't come soon enough
>>145885353
>>145886276
>>145887594
>>145887736
>>145888783
I am going to get M2k, thanks for you guys' inputs. See yous in opsmfw I still don't really know how to A-10C, working on it thou but wanted some fast jet action to change it up
>>145890575
>M2K has NO tutorials
Wait wut? You serious?
>>145890752
Dont worry about tutorial missions just use
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-uSpZROuEd3WnVhcm5hTUJOTjg/view
and you will be a god in the M2000C in no time
>>145890273
It turns off automatically.
>>145890125
Damn, what a dodge
>mfw I will never be able to do that, because I don't see launches and have no clue what is considered a launch warning
>Working on Super Hornets like I do every day
>Some tards dumped APU accumulator using the brakes wrong when towing the jet
>Go underneath it and furiously pump the rod to re-service the accumulator
>Come back a short time later to remove a servo, start taking off the hyde line
>Warm, thick hydraulic fluid sprays all over my face
Jet 141, I....
>>145890752A-10C is overrated and boring as fuck.
>>145892017
Only one plane can provide its user with the feeling exhilaration and power of flying the deadliest bird in the sky.
>>145889804
>not using differential braking
>>145892242
of*
>>145892017
>the most complex DCS module up to date
>boring
Sure is Babby Cliff shit in here
>>145891674
think you might be pregnant bud, better check that out
>>145892686
It is pretty boring though.
It's too advanced, and it's basically expend mavericks go home, rinse and repeat ad nausea.
Why are there two A-10s in DCS. I know the A-10a is in baby cliffs so is it just like a way less complicated version or what?
when the fuck are we gonna get news on the f18
>>145892924
Its not advanced as it could be since we are using an old suite. And any jet is basically expend missile, go home, rinse and repeat.
>>145893263
One is for dumb niggers who want a simple striker with no systems while the other is a precise killer but requires more knowledge about what you are doing.
>>145893263
Yes, the A-10A is much less complex and NO clickable cockpit; in other words, all keyboard shortcuts
The C is full fidelity with a bunch of stuff and a (nearly) fully clickable cockpit
>no modules model heating or anything like that
>barely any modules model oxygen
why even play
>>145890575
Chuck owl guide is good for basics
Bunyapsims or whatever has a good set of videos for some of the radar/close air combat modes
>>145894220
like every fixed wing module models oxygen deprivation and shit though
>>145894220
>>145894925
Don't worry you just have to come to terms with the fact that all the planes are remotely piloted and what we see is merely a robot's vision, therefore there are no oxygen deprivation because we have no need for oxygen
![full-14395-46074-dcs_2012_11_29_00_09_51_27[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/FDzfMyE.jpg "full-14395-46074-dcs_2012_11_29_00_09_51_27[1].jpg")
>>145895679
??????
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nraj7UGPpHQ
PFM never.
>>145893507
yeah, but in the A10C it's basically the only thing you can do since it's not even fast.
DCS ops never
>>145897242
The A-10 was never meant to work alone and it relied on other other aircraft to clear the skies for it.
Not to mention the fact you wouldn't deploy A-10's into combat until you got air superiority.
>>145898209
Barring the pointless stuff you just typed that, i find it extremely boring, and nothings going to change that.
>>145898361
>not running the A-10C like it's a wild weasel plane
not my nigga
>>145898361
I was trying to point out that to use anything else than standoff mavs you would require the skies to be clear.
>>145891115
>tfw no buddy to lase for your guided eclairs
Please advise when ops habben
OPS WHEN?
>>145899568
>not dumping flares continuing your attack run after the evading the missile
>>145901173
Mirage only gets 16 flares, can't dump
>>145901526
does that look like a mirage to you?
>>145901526
Disregard this, i suck cocks instead of looking at the HUD
If we do some ops will someone hand hold me through the mirage, I just got it.
>>145881905
>Shit was getting so complicated, so fast, that it became common practice to have a second guy just to operate the radar and weapons.
Funny you should say that, I was just thinking to myself that that pit actually looks remarkably simple only to then remember that there is a second seat where all the complicated stuff is.
>>145891674
>Some tards dumped APU accumulator using the brakes wrong when towing the jet
Can you explain how this works?
>>145892838
>Not wanting a 1/2 hornet baby
>>145903183
would't mind a 1/2 Tomcat baby desu
BMS ops WHEN
how do i make my pc run dcs?
>>145905387
Double click the short cut on the desktop
>>145867164
>Train Simulator
Shouldn't this be in plural?
>Farming Simulator 2015
Why only 2015?
>>145905627
well it doesn't work does it.
>farm sim 2017 trailer
>CGI out the ass
>will actually just be a slightly updated '16
god what I would give for a farm sim combined with spintires physics and vegetation detail like in The Hunter ... fuck, even ditches next to several roads would be a great improvement, but then Giants software is like ... 2-3 people?
Is there any downside to taking an Eclair pod on the M2000?
>>145908458
Not really, unless you need to land on a very short runway that would need the use of a parachute. But even then you could just use a short field landing technique.
>>145890752
M2k is early access and has no tutorials or campaign, it will get these added later.
>>145908458
Eclair actually doesn't work right now. It shows you having more flares/chaff on the counter but actually just dispenses and holds the same amount.
>go to refuel in the M2K
>go to precontact
>tanker fucking rams the throttles all the way forward and starts to bank despite being miles from his nearest waypoint
at this point I'm convinced ED just enjoys actively trolling their playerbase
>go to lock him up to shoot him down for being a cunt
>gun snake never changes
>just have to boresight aim to kill him
Will ED revamp the mavericks with the release of DCS 2.0 and the F/A-18C?
>>145912816
Nobody knows.
>>145912816
I'd be so happy if they stopped locking onto stupid shit like random buildings and bushes.
>>145912816
What do you mean revamp? Do you mean make them operate more like BMS? Because even BMS' implementation is wrong, the pilot would almost never boresight the mavs in flight, the ground crew does it for them.
Kaiser's plane
>>145914773
I was thinking more of this >>145914671
Its annoying that my 65D locks onto a lamp post instead of the tank next to it. And of course the the cross steady/flash is inverted in DCS.
>>145915112
>WWII DCS
Get the fuck out.
>>145915471
fuck you the messer is fun to fly
>>145915793
this
>>145915471
How about go fucc yourself famborn
>>145915793
>>145915839
>>145915878
>WWII DCS
KILL
YOUR
SELVES
There is too many WWII flight sims to count, and DCS is literally the only popular modern sim. Stop infecting this game with your boring as fuck prop shit.
Fuck you and any other faggot that pays for WWII modules.
>M2000
>trying to refuel
>get super close to the drogue
>time to hesitate
>pilot induced oscillations
i wanna cry.
>>145916354
>then i post the wrong webm
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFuck
>>145916281
Trainers are even worse, nobody fucking wants this besides giga autists
Literal autism
>>145916281
>KILL YOUR SELVES
Never >:^)
>>145916281
tell me of one modern WWII study sim
I'll wait
>>145916937
HOT FAST DELIVERY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8DhS9kiTPDw
NO NEED TO WAIT
>>145916354
What's happening in that webm?
>>145917267
>CLoD
>Study sim
k
even if we're counting that as a study sim, you've found one- not too many to count.
>>145917267
>CloD
>modern
>>145916281
>There is too many WWII flight sims to count
>IL-2 series
>list ends there
>Stop infecting this game with your boring as fuck prop shit.
>posted as I fly 30 minutes to launch 4 missles and return to base
>>145917535
i forgot which riot it was but hes shooting rock salt
>>145917648
What is it not a study sim?
Please elaborate I am confused
Am I being memed on?
>>145917658
bos/bom is pretty modern but /simg/ doesnt call it a study sim because it doesnt have the oooh shiney clickable cockpits.
>>145918168
The systems and flight modelling in every IL-2 series game is FC3-tier at best. IL-2 is a survey sim series- a lot of aircraft modeled at alright-enough fidelity with their systems abstracted into a few button presses usually.
CLoD is probably the closest IL-2 there is to a study sim, but it's still not quite there IMO.
BoS/BoM most definitely is NOT a study sim, the fucking engine thermal modelling is based on a fucking timer and operates independently of airspeed and ambient temperature.
>>145918559
>40 degrees C
>mattering to engines running at 800 deg
How do you fuckers set up rudders? Twisting my 16000m and using the rocker on my T.flight throttle aren't doing it for me in il-2 and shit ****der
>>145918559
>BoS/BoM most definitely is NOT a study sim, the fucking engine thermal modelling is based on a fucking timer and operates independently of airspeed and ambient temperature.
Now where did you hear that from? That isn't the case at all.
The flight models are very opinion based but I cannot change your opinion. The bf-109 auto trims itself out at 300km/h or so thats about the best I can say.
Comparatively the little I played of dcs p-51 it felt stiff and robotic. It felt too obvious the people who made it are used to making jet simulators.
And lets be honest your a bit dumb for buying a ww2 module for a modern flight simulator. Like do you even have bombers to intercept?
>>145919813
You need a lot of rudder for take off.
like nearly 100%
>>145918948
>800deg C
>in any fucking WWII fighter
the maximum allowable engine coolant temperature in the Bf-109K4 in DCS is 100deg C.
>>145920467
Hop into either of the Messers in BoS right now. Take off at take off power, and keep track of the time you stay at this setting for. The engine will fail (either partially or fully) when the "do not exceed" timer for the engine is passed, regardless of airspeed or ambient temperature- the devs looked at the technical manuals (which everyone fucking knows give you peacetime numbers, your engine won't explode if you ride a specific power setting a few seconds longer than you're supposed to) and made the engine perform to that point. I can't comment on any of the other aircraft, as the 109 is the only airplane in the game I really know at all, but yeah- its engine fails consistently on the time breaks for the power settings you put it at. Maintaining max continuous power at low airspeeds with high ambient temperatures doesn't induce any kind of failure, either, even though it should.
>>145920897
>only 100c
git gud lol
>>145920467
>You need a lot of rudder for take off.
>like nearly 100%
That's not my issue, its the fine adjustments when your reticule is just off their wing
>>145921794
You aren't supposed to rudder while aiming youll wibble wobble every which way if you rudder.
As one great man once said "youll catch caddywhompus for sure"
>>145920897
Did you have simple engine management on or something?
Because this isn't the case.
>>145921794
Practice rudder control by stepping on the ball, no trim. You'll get used to small changes after a while.
Take into consideration that you'll get fucked by the wobble if you move the rudder just before shooting.
Any DCS ops happening tonight?
>>145921067
Hmm... I am no expert in WWII planes or any prop planes in general
But maybe you're over temp already?
I believe nearly all gauges are design in such way you're almost always not suppose to reach the end of the gauge, as you need indication of a wide range of readings for normal operation and ,perhaps even more important, the readings to tell you that you have exceeded safe/normal operation.
So with this idea in mind, your gauge being maxed out and reading 120C (or maybe even hotter, but you wouldn't know) would most likely mean that you have exceeded the normal operation temperature. (Like how your tachometer has a section you will never reach and the speedometer has speeds that the car will likely never reach or like the coolant temp gauge in a car, there is a over temp zone)
Is there any way to run LOMAC in a low-end PC?
>>145923147
Yeah, in about half an hour.
Get in the TS.
>>145923951
How low end are we talking here?
Ops happening. Come one come all
>>145925397
motha
fukin
ops
>>145925397
what ops are you guys doing
if it's something i care to do I might hop in
>>145925930
bluefor ops + ukrainian grachs basically
>>145883676
>don't care to go down that road again.
Just fucking use the Chairforce Magazine definition like any sane individual.
>>145915112
The silica capsule always manages to piss me off, even if I know exactly why it's there.
![AH-64_Apache_extraction_exercise[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/Z6A4Y4G.jpg "AH-64_Apache_extraction_exercise[1].jpg")
>10
how goes the ops?
>>145932864
Poor. I TK'd somebody.
>>145932864
webms on the way senpai
>weed lmao man in charge of taxiing
>>145902972
When towing it with power off, the jet's brakes have to be in emergency setting, so the pedals in the cockpit can still function. Someone left brakes completley off however and tried to use them, doing so dumps the gas from the APU
>>145933635sorry
>>145934035
>>145934035
>not putting the fuel bags and everything else heavy in the innermost pylons
>>145934756
Not even the original OFP looked that bad, are you using mods?
a ded before bed
>>145938554
Kill yourself.
>>145938836
Something tells me the AC skin+F-15C set you off.
Here, have another. Featuring gods Idol+plane
>>145939001
Yes, keep posting shit, keep proving the argument that all the ACfags deserve to get culled.
>flying with simg ever
wow lmfao
Gods Heli
>>145942046
wait, were Ka-50s involved in OPS?
I specifically didn't come because fixed wing is kinda boring to me atm I didn't know there'd be hokums
>>145942167
Yes.
>>145942167
ye
>>145942362
>>145942425
fugg. I guess I'll need to pop my head in to see what's available next time.
Slightly related, how the fuck do you attack defended targets without good terrain masking in the Ka-50? The vikhrs don't really have the range to be used standoff against most tactical SAMs (barring really bad shit like IR/Optical SAMs and AAA), and you don't have an RWR to let you know when to break like you do in the gazlel.
How the fuck do I zoom with the joystick in DCS while using headtracking? / and * won't work.
>>145942938
bind something to zoom in slow/zoom out slow?
or just set an axis to zoom if you have a spare rotary or something like the little lever on the side of the warthog throttle
>>145943120
>bind something to zoom in slow/zoom out slow
I thought * and / were binded to those functions, I guess I'll double check just for being sure.
>>145943982
What's with your colors?
>>145944172
if that isn't working, check to make sure you don't have an axis bound to zoom. I also think the MiG-29 (and maybe some of the other FC3 aircraft?) just zoom based on your trackIR because they're not proper 6dof cockpits.
>>145917658
Looks better than bos so yeah, it's modern.
so where should I go to talk about arma ?
>check out Trackhat's website because some people whined that Delan and the chink get recommended instead of of them
>the fucking hat with IR emitters, USB powered costs 35 pounds
>a DIY IR emitter hat costs 10 bucks tops (that is assuming you buy everything) AND it's much easier to make than a DIY LED clip
At least the shipping prices aren't as retarded as Delan - he wants 8 pounds for shipping to the EU (really?), Tackhat's shipping both for the EU and US costs less than 3 pounts, I gotta give them that.
>>145944250
idk I'm trying a different program for my webms, I'll use the old one and figure out why it isn't working
>>145945163
for a long walk off a short pier
>never
![apache1111[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/8GwfXok.jpg "apache1111[1].jpg")
http://www.mudspike.com/ah-64d-tarnished-gold-campaign-aar/
I NEED TO STOP READING THIS SHIT
I know it's Arma shit but jesus christ can you imagine how cool it would be to do this shit in DCS
tfw no apache longbow in DCS ever
>>145948658
>tfw no arma like game thats just arma but actually good
fugg
>>145948906
>DCS will never have even vaguely competent implementation of ground vehicles
you know what's super realistic for a tank company to do while being shot at from 5km by an attack helicopter hovering in place?
just fucking sit there
>>145949209
hey now, the ai sometimes moves a few meters in a random direction when being shot at
>>145948906
The community is the biggest problem with arma
>>145921794
You don't use rudder for guns except in snap shooting. Using the rudder would just make you uncoordinated and you'd be shooting sideways into the airflow. Just bank a little bit more and fly the reticle onto the target.
>>145950149
The shit code is about as big of a problem as the shit community. I mean really there's shit leftover from OFP and the current devs have no idea on what that does.
>>145950816
Fair enough. I mean the game plays well enough and does what it set out to do. Just the community ruin it. I guess if they knew what thst code did it'd be a less bloated game
>>145950987
>that shit optimization
>the FPS cap is the same as the FPS the server can achieve meme
That's not "well enough" for a 2013 game, that's downright embarrassing.
>>145951142
And DCS is any better?
>>145951780
DCS actually uses the graphics card and never suffered from stupid shit such as >the FPS cap is the same as the FPS the server can achieve.
As of now it just lacks true mulitcore, but it has a lot of problems that have little to do with shit code.
>all of my favourite generals are dying
its a terrible feeling
>>145953783
the worst part is that the only ones easily staying alive are those with "esports" or rampant waifu posting
>>145953783
>>145953905
Just gotta keep bumping. we've never been a terribly active general
BMS ops WHEN
>>145953990
at this time is it usually just Russians/Euros posting or are some of you north Americans staying up late?
>>145944331
I'm using the 25T, also there aren't any axes bound to zooming, pls help
>>145954182
I'm a euro and I often keep posting when I can during work/personal commitments
>>145954226
Actually this is weird, the zooming keys function in instant action but not in training. Also DCS isn't recognizing my stick anymore.
>>145954403
Well I rebooted DCS and now it recognizes the stick again. Whatever.
Guided missiles ruined the fashion of air combat
WW1, WW2 and Korea a best
>>145954182
I'm a mericunt, but I work night shift so I tend to be a night owl
>>145949209
That's why 90% of all dcs missions are very unrealistic like sending 1 cas plane to destroy 20 tanks. And that's sp missions, mp pvp setups are just pure bullshit.
>>145954694
>Yak jets
>>145955328
>Yakovlev
>>145954970
Well you can make a realistic mission.
Sit in an A10 for 3 hours circling an AO, shoot a house and go home.
>>145955478
>Lavochkin
>Country offering free flight sim time in mi-24 sims from elbit, in order to get more pilots.
>can't go have a fucking test on that die
ROOOOOOOOOOOO
>>145955810
At least Lavochkin made good planes during WW2.
>>145944331
It's me again, it seems that zooming doesn't work only on the 25T, it works fine on the TF51, any ideas on what might be causing it?
>>145955779
Would be actually fun if it had radio chatter with good VA and some happenings on the ground, not just static shit that barely does anything.
>>145956204
That happens to me when the zoom view was bound to the Z axis of my headtracking. It was randomly assigned to be like that in some craft and not in others. Are you sure that's not the case?
Double check to make sure zoom view isn't bound to it in the axis assign menu.
>>145956379
Yeah I can see a slow-burn mission where you just run a patrol while talking shit with your wingman and occasionally having some teenaged JTAC on the ground direct you to blow up some dirt hills might be fun if it were done correctly. Not everything has to be about killing lots of dudes.
>>145956535
Yeah it was and only on the 25T, fucking rooster coding I swear. I thought I already removed that binding and saved the config too.
>>145956552
we do that>>145945915
>>145956552
I just started the Deployment campaign with the Ka-50 and the first mission was following a Hind for an hour while they give you a tour of the place, pointing out points of interest.
It's barebones as fuck but it was still an enjoyable flight.
>tfw I was expecting a manpad up our ass the whole way because of the hind's warning to ready countermeasures
>>145956725
Slavs gonna slav.
moneis plz
https://youtu.be/uYbqlkvBzzw
>>145957070
>only a few muted beeps
I'm not feeling it.
>>145957419
wat
>>145957617
I'm not getting a proper Grach vibe without the SPO-15 constantly letting me know that it's there.
>>145957070
Noise. Record more stuff pls.
>>145957070
(This video is not available)
>>145957759
i cant we have super sekrit)))))))) brevity codes.To be honest, I like montages. I'll probably start posting videos like that if I have any good sorties during ops with multiple ships
>>145957948
>>145957948Are you in Germany?
>>145958328
No, but on phone in canada
I see some devices problem, that must be it
Because posting from bed is high end comfy
>>145958328
Why did you block scheisseland?
>>145957070
What a rookie, are you new to the 25T in general or something?
>>145957774
>Tupolev
>>145957070
What's the music's name? It's pretty comfy.
>>145958502
>>145958521
Stop.
>>145958863
Donald Byrd
https://youtu.be/jbToIgl6dnU
>>145958948
Here kid a few tips for free:
- turn on DIRCM when entering the target area
- if you are engaging targets with Vikhrs use speed brakes with the first missile to give you more time to find a follow up target
- you can fire a second Vikhr the moment the first one hits by turning off and then back on the laser, this way you will avoid the "cool down" timer
- if you are engaging soft targets with Vikhrs you can override the fire control and launch from 10 - 11 km away and the target will still be destroyed
- use fucking flares when you are done with a attack run
If you cannot kill at least 3 targets with 1 run you are defined as a scrublord in a 25T
>>145959671
>- if you are engaging soft targets with Vikhrs you can override the fire control and launch from 10 - 11 km away and the target will still be destroyed
Here's proer tip, it doesn't matter you can shoot whatever at that range it'll still be destroyed, DCS doesn't have penetration falloff.
>>145961090
Wrong. Most western MBT's will survive unless hit from the side or rear.
>removing "vehicle" from the OP
Retard.
>>145961285
What does that have to do with penetration falloff?
They'll survive from the front at any range.
>>145961361
You said anything would die at that range, well tanks don't.
>>145961297
>A thread for all vehicle simulation games
The problem is that people never read the OP and shitposting isn't deterred by anything.
>>145961502
LEARN
TO
READ
First off.
Missiles do the same damage at any range, it doesnt matter, tanks like the m1s need between 1 and 3 vikhrs to the front depending where you hit, since hitting the turret damages it more.
again
distance doesnt have anything to do with how much damage a vehicle will suffer.
Do you understand it now?
Do you need me to translate it in your fuck awful language as well?
>>145961502
But they do from side and rear aspects, which is true at any range
>>145961090
The Vikhrs don't have penetration falloff as they use a fucking tandem HEAT warhead.
>>145961857
That's not how it works anon.
Penetration lessens as the missiles speed decreases, it doesn't matter if it has a quadruple tandem, it's a matter of speed.
for the 3rd time now i think, this isn't modeled in DCS.
I know this is offtopic but i can't find any business/political simulation thread. Does it exist?
>>145961945
Do you know/understand how HEAT warheads work? They're not KE perpetrators, and HEAT tank rounds usually have much less propellant than APDS.
>>145962051
>>>/gsg/enjoy the shitposting
>this one guy claims he knows shit about DCS
>when the video where he was flying clearly shows no one in this group has a clue
You post videos that show how shit the group is and then you think anyone will take you seriously when sperging out? LMAO
