Ded but not defeated.
>What is this?
A general for all strategic, operational, and tactical war games that can't generate enough traffic to sustain their own generals. ARMA need not apply.
>Old thread
>Attention Grabbing tags:
/wgg/ /rtt/ /rts/ /rtsg/ /tsg/ /mowg/ /mowassg/ /ctag/
>Example welcome games:
Wargame: Red Dragon
Combat Mission
Call to Arms
Flashpoint Campaigns
Graviteam Tactics
Theatre of War
Men of War
Command: Modern Air Naval Operations
Armored Brigade
Close Combat
Steel Beasts
Steel Panthers MBT
CMANO
>Graviteam DLC:
http://pastebin.com/TwMLZQ6h (embed)
>Interesting history links:
Cold War military technology ads:
http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/military-ads-1980s
/wgg/ misc Cold War literature:
http://www.mediafire.com/download/zfm69f0k91pmf0y/wgg-lit-v1.3.rar
The Soviet Army: troops, organization & equipment
http://fas.org/irp/doddir/army/fm100-2-3.pdf
USMC intelligence North Korea handbook:
http://fas.org/nuke/guide/dprk/nkor.pdf
Everything there is to know about the T-62:
http://thesovietarmourblog.blogspot.my/2015/12/t-62.html
>Steamgroups:
/wgg/ old group
http://steamcommunity.com/groups/VG-Wargamers
/wgg/ new group
http://steamcommunity.com/groups/dedgamededthread
Uralmod official group
http://steamcommunity.com/groups/Uralgraznomod
/wgg/ Men of War / Call to Arms Group
http://steamcommunity.com/groups/ReReaGa
>Teamspeak server
uralmod.typefrag.com:7495
>Legacy Wargame General pasta and game-info repository:
http://pastebin.com/70Nwcb5m (embed)
https://www.dropbox.com/s/lon0cgmjfqwq1oi/WargameRD_Hidden_Knowledge_Spreadsheet.xlsx?dl=0
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UvBiH3lrCFzLYnRzNzF49yVtaNHYLfi7dgMpNE517RM/
>Mius Front Link:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9C_KBrk6cmCcTBmN0lqNG9ocVE/view
Bump
>>136413651
Thanks for bumping with me, my friend.
Page 7 already. It's over lads.
>>136414126
>T-64A
>NVA markings
triggered
Anybody interested in a Steel Panthers WW2 aar as germany?
Credit to the autistic posters that keep this place bumped during the slow periods. It's fucking work.
>>136414296
I thought it too at first, but it's actually early T-72 Ural (early production batches had T-64A turret).
>>136414126
No Problem
>>136414834
Thanks, love ya
I love Battle for Wesnoth but the Tolkien theme annoys me. Is there another free wargame with random that does not use Tolkien lore?
>>136415321
Wrong.
The tank is equipped with TC remote NSVT, all T-72s, even prototypes, did not feature this.
Also early T-72 did not have T-64A turret, albeit it had one very similar. The "new" turret was required due the autoloader of the T-64A not being adopted.
Only the T-80 original production model had a copy of the T-64A turret but also lacked remote NSVT.
>>136418775
WinSPMBT
>>136419920
>WinSPMBT
It ain't free.
>>136420184
it is
>>136414384
I love all sorts of AAR, so count me in.
>>136420184
Someone should finally add this to the oppost, I repeat myself like 4th time. Rename CamoDLL.dll to DXAniTimer.dll and you're good.
>>136420471
Where? Legally? Have you a download link?
Regarding the AARs. My last mission of mini-campaign isn't over yet, here's the situation so far.
In the south enemy tried rushing his armor through my road block, didn't work as well, he even started bypassing it in the south right through the river. Remnants of my armored forces are gathered around the southern mission objective, but they'll be all dead as this thread once enemy Leo 2A4 turns its frontal armor in their direction.
In the middle I've transfered BMP-2 platoon and recon elements with ATGMs from the northern side (which is ignored by the enemy) and preparing to fight yet another Leo 2A4 platoon. Once again, I can rely on side and rear hits only, so this is pretty much a game of chance.
>>136421145
On the fucking official site, just open up Google (for retard like you: type google.com in the big white bar in your browser and press Enter), search for WinSPMBT and the first or one of the first links would be it.
Next turn started fairly good - our old friend Leutnant Rossbach has yet another enemy kill, this time it's Leo 2A4.
In the middle another Leo 2A4 is caught into crossfire and got it's side projection penetrated twice by T-72, resulting in a kill.
And finally in th middle RPG-7V team gets it's shit together and manages to hit another Leo 2A4 from 200 meters right in its shiny metal butt.
>>136421993
Someone even plays campaigns, I tried once, playing with Russian airborne company against Japan and got my shit handled to me by Type 90s and reservists spam.
Also, I'd love to code some shit like FPRS or WinSPMBT but in real time, like Armored Brigade, but on a higher level of command and with more strict OOBs
Enemy tanks in the northern woods are suffring heavy losses to RPGs fire. One was even unlucky enough to be destroyed by the Factoria.
>>136422772
thats probably the easiest campaign. you can move from sector to sector raping everthing with helos
>>136423927
forgot pic
Meawhile in the south roadblock finally gets overrun once the jaegers catch up with the tanks.
And enemy effectively counters my artillery with his FASCAM. Luckly only two tubes are lost, others are about to reposition.
>>136422772
Basically something like FCRS, but in real time?
As for campaign - I've only managed to win one battle out of four so far, others were a draw. And all of them resulted in mutual destruction, so its pretty tough out here too.
Enemy is approaching mission objective in what looks like a combined arms force. For some weird reason Gepards are leading the way. Well, happend to me in Eugene's Wargame too.
Meanwhile I pop a couple of 2A4 in the north and lose a T-55, which I decided to reposition a bit closer, to enemy Milan
>>136423927
Read my message one more time, I wad talking about WinSPMBT, retard
>>136424341
>Basically something like FCRS, but in real time?
Yeah, I also like the aspects of indirect control
>>136425151
yes, yes you were. my bad
>>136425705
I still love you, anon <3
Leutnant Rossbach scores his tenth kill, it was Leopard 2A4. Me and enemy are in opposite situations now - I've lost almost all my infantry, bar mech company HQ and some ATGM and AAA. And he's out of armor, while his infantry finally starts creeping at my mission objectives. Unfortunately for me he has some Milan II which could be a disaster for me.
Woo-hoo, it's finally over and looks like are in for a major victory! Also it's 5th time both me and enemy have very little to fight with in the end. This time my artillery was a game-saver - not sure I'd stand my ground if those waves of enemy Jagers and PzGrens made it to my positions in time and in full numbers
Nope, just a marginal victory. And the campaign is finally over, all in all it was quite interesting to play. Fun fact - the only modern enemy MBT I've knocked out with frontal penetration was a M1A1 in one of the first mission. If this resembles real life, then Cold war gone hot would be a world of hurt for NVA, CSLA and Wojsko Polskie. In SPMBT only Soviets possess tank ammunition that can somewhat reliably penetrate contemporary enemy MBTs. And even then tons of ATGMs they have on pretty much anything are good only against older MBTs or IFVs
>>136425331Warmachinist spotted
>>136430416
I'd still like a system where tanks aren't allowed to shit out 4 rounds before receiving return fire.
The 2.0.11 version of FCRS plans to have this bullshit too, which will make it marginally worse.
wtf
Good WW1 game when
>inb4 Call of Verdun
>>136430416
>Warmachinist spotted
Sorry, never played that. It always bothered me that you have to manually control every single unit, unlike RL commanders do.
post cold war stuff:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=77GtrSa6qNc
>>136432067I was talking about your picture, saw them on /wm/ lately
Is Rule the Waves /wgg/?
I am addicted.
>>136434995
yes post some pics
>>136435863
On my cell, I will when I'm off work.
Just started an Austria-Hungary game, War with Italy by 1902.
>>136428956
how big are your maps?
and do you have any attacking tips for a beginner?
>>136436579
great fuck the shitalians
>>136437278
>do you have any attacking tips for a beginner?
Before every attack, use lots of artillery and spam the 'Z' key
10
>>136419373
The NSVT is just rotated forwards that's all (duh), it's not remote controlled. If you look well enough you'd see flaps on hull sides, no T-64 model ever had them. As for the turret, I forgot to write "T-64A styled turret", yea it wasn't straight from T-64A.
Tank in the picture is just early T-72. Pic related.
>>136422530
Based rossbach
is there a way to set a higher resolution to winspmbt without the cd version? like an .ini tweak or something
Any one have one of these for 9. Panzerdivision?
>>136441431
>flaps on hull sides, no T-64 model
pic related, u wot m8.
and
the T-72 NSVT's magazine is different from the T-64, (50 rnds vs. 150 rnds)
the T-72 NSVT has a collimator sight just above it, which the T-64 lacks
the T-64 has the TC IR always aligned immediately left of the NSVT
any AS2 players in the house? I wanna do some Co-op
>>136422392
I get it, it was only the CD version that is not free. Thank you anon.
>>136444804
I should've included my own pastebin with ORBATs in the op, there should be DDR ones:
http://pastebin.com/0LCQp3Tf
>>136420184
>Only made one mage and is getting rekt by skelemans
lel
>>136449423
I'm a noob.
>>136444230
Just get the CD version it takes literally 10 second
>>136450873
nigga im broke as fuck.
>>136444230
see here >>136420901
>>136448095
CD version is free.
Attention to the fucking retard who makes the next general, add the steel pantherz CD exploit to the OP so we don't have to keep typing it out
>>136446923
please respond
>>136451660
They send CD for free? Are you talking about the iso only?
>>136451986
What the fuck
>>136451986
Fucking read the thread. How one person can be this retarded?
>>136451714
>Play AS2 coop with friend
>all the nations have the same maps with the same objectives
I've never been so dissapointed. I'd play with you for shit and giggles anyway but I have 35% packet loss since 3 days ago and Im about to get an aneurysm because of it.
>>136452245
The fuck is packet loss?
>>136448568
Thanks bro.
>>136451986
READ THIS
>>136451406
>>136452218
I don't. I find the free version on http://www.shrapnelgames.com/Camo_Workshop/MBT/MBT_page.html
But I don't find a link to dl the iso. Is there a link somewhere to a free iso?
>>136452456
That's cracking, that ain't free. I was precise I use the word free, like in Linux is free.
>>136452869
So I'm not retarded.
>>136452956
It is literally renaming a file
>>136452956
>So I'm not retarded.
Yes you are. There is nothing illegal in renaming files.
>>136452956
>renaming a file is cracking
how low have we fallen
>>136453040
>>136453096
>>136453409
It's cracking. I'm not scared by doing illegal things like that, but I don't need to crack Wesnoth.
>>136453485
>It's cracking.
>A is B because I said so.
Okay, m8, enjoy your 800x600 version
>>136453949
It's cracking.
>It's just a buffer overflow exploit, so it ain't cracking.
You're ridiculous.
>It's just a security trap, it ain't cracking.
>I just found the code of nuclear weapon I can use them, it ain't cracking.
>...
It's not because you can do something that it isn't illegal.
>800x600
I don't say I won't do it. But small resolutions don't annoy me.
>>136454567
Thanks for bumping with your shitposting anyway
>>136455086
You're welcome.
>>136450273
So much so that you didn't know that you NEED mages (and Elvish Fighters, to soak hits, because I'm guessing you can't make Woses) to fuck up undead, more than anything else?
Shaman's are useful for heals but they're not on the same level as mages. Get some white mages and you'll just roll the fuckers.
>>136455497
Thank for the information. I will try to have white mage for the undead. But don't worry I always read and study units description to understand which kind of units I have to use. I have a lot to learn.
>beat AmberT twice in ranked
>does nothing but spam 10pt infantry in gavins, SK60bs, puffs and leo 1s
>about to win a third time
>helo rushes me
>fight him again
>more helo rushes
People actually look up to this turbosperg?
Just finished a 4 hour game of Men of War 2 with the terminator mod.
I'm sweaty and tired now.
Disbanding the soviet union was the bravest thing a man did in the 20th century.
>>136457080
>terminator mod
going to go look this up
perheväkivalta
>>136457183
It's a fucking amazing mod, gives you alot of tools to customize battles.
It adds like 100 new vehicles and shit.
Also adds China, Hungary, France.
>>136457357
Is it as good as Robz?
>>136457429
In term of new vehicles? Yes alot.
But it's not really a multiplayer mod, mostly for fun extended SP games.
>>136457538
What's yer steam so I have a co-op buddy
>>136457135
Care to elaborate?
>>136457649
look up Ser Colgate or infoman567
>>136457692
It was a major step forward world peace and the betterment of the lives of the people of the earth.
>>136458175
>betterment
>millions of people died due to famine after fall of USSR, not mentioning countless local wars.
Your opinion -> trash
>>136458312
That wasn't because of the Soviet Union's collapse itself, it was because Yeltsin was a fuckhead dictator with no idea how to run a country.
>>136458312
Every reform has negative short term effects.
>>136458631
Some of the wars happened before Yeltsin (for example Armenia/Azerbaijan), and you'd expect anarchy after the fall of governmental power.
I'd prefer something like 80s-90s Chinese reform with liberalization of the state without going full anarchy.
>>136458692
>just """"short term"""""" side effects )))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Pic related.
>>136457080
>tfw it got an update a couple of days ago
haha time to install Men of War again
Le changing files is le illegal crack
Page 10 shitpost
rate my deck guise
>>136464976
>supply helo
>Mi-8
>no autocannon IFVs
>No T-64BM or T-72BU
>no BRDM-3
>taking Sturm/Norov when you can use the points for better vehicles
>MiG-31 over MiG-25PD
>No SEAD
>Navy
>>136466078
>MiG-31 over MiG-25PD
>using either of those
>not being a shitter
Pick one.
>>136466294
>Not wanting cheap and effective fighters that come more than 1 per card
>being this bad
>>136466398
>not wanting to be a cheesing scumbag = bad
topcuc. Meme unit crutch user git gud.
>>136466078
>navy
>complaining about a slot thats fucking free
>>136464976
>supply helo
>not taking the largest truck available
>btr robot
>strelki not in bmp-1d
>heliborne infantry
>strela-10
>tube arty
>no mortar
>no buratino or smerch
>t-80b
>t-80bv
>no superheavy
>no emergency heavy
>no t-64bm
>brdm-2
>no brdm-3
>no ground-borne recon inf
>atgm vehicles
>norov
>mi-24p
>mig-27k instead of vetted mig-27
>mig-31
>no vetted mig-25pd
>no sead
>naval
>>136466686
>If it's good, it's meme
>>136468093
>navy
Shitter central in here today
>>136466686
>being a satanist hato apologist
>>136464976
Better?
>>136471498
>Still no T-64BM
>No T-72BU
>No recce inf
>Sturm when you already have Konkurs-M
>Afghanskiis when you already have plenty of Biryusas
>BTR-152E
>MiG-29 instead of a good ASF
>>136472986
>T-64BM
is it really worth it? The T-72B1 has been doing a good job so far (I think)
>T-72BU
why really? Aren't the T-80U's enough?
>good ASF
such as?
>>136471498
>two supply trucks
>4/5 inf tab
>bmp-1p
>uragan (though not useless, it's not as good as a buratino)
>upvetted mortars
>no superheavy
>gutted recon tab
>overabundant vehicle tab
>wishing for non-veteran mig-27 to hit their target
>>136473887
T-64bm is probably the best cost effective medium tank as of now, better than the k1 and mexas.
T-72bu is a requirement for superheavy spearhead tactics as it will only be stopped by a m1a2, atgm plane, lucky or plentiful tow-2, longbow and infantry nests such as woods and cities.
Best (and only) option for a fighter is a pair of veteran mig-25pd.
But in any case, you should play men of war instead as it is a massively better game.
>>136473887
T-64BM is the current meta medium tank for USSR
T-72BU is one of the higher end tanks that can compete with higher tier Abrams
>Good ASF
I already suggested the MiG-25PD.
>>136464976
>>136471498
Ignore the memeposters. Having a naval tab is fine, you'll regret it if you'll accidentally join a land/naval game.
Just a tip, the minimum should be:
>2 Jianghu
>3 Hujian
Jianghu is mainly for coastal bombardment and sector capturing, Hujian is the real deal and you will never want to lose them. If possible, bring your FOB as close as possible to the coast, otherwise just hope one of your teammates has a supply ship.
The other 3 slots can be whatever you want. I personally suggest naval infantry, so as USSR, it would be:
>BTR-** Morskaya Pekhota
>BTR-** Spetznaz GRU
>Afghanskii
Afghanskii for immediate air support on landing and as a cheap (20+5) transport for land CV. Just dump one next to a spare CV and ship it around.
Oh, this?
Just a BMP.
So as someone who hasn't touched a war game besides his friends old copy of men of war. What is a good game to get into?
>>136486632
Men of war isn't a wargame
>>136486820
>>136486632
Probably one of the Wargame series. Heard that EE is good for SP while RD is for MP. Graviteam Tactics is nice if you can handle a ride with no tutorials and a steep learning curve. Then there's hex stuff but might not what you're looking for.
>>136489110
Is there multiplayer in Graviteam Tactics?
>>136489310
Coming soon, no ETA.
>>136489805
Shame, seems like a cool game to play in co-op with a bro.
>>136487434
Doesn't make it a wargame
Bump
Fug, /wgg/, this is a lot of ships. Just about the entire Austrian and Italian navies showed up to fight.
>>136493615
Is there anything like rule the waves but WW2
>>136496621
If you go super old school there's the Great Naval Battles series, but it doesn't have any of the design or diplomatic layers.
Page almost 10 bump
Also what time period does this naval shit go up to
I elected to stay home from a tinder date with an Korean amateur model to play Mius Front. I have my priorities set
>>136499694
Forgot pic. Going to get fucked tonight anyway because I have only 1 AT gun in this battle
>>136500440
looks like the perfect match to use the Retreat option
>>136472986
>>136476904
>>136477470
>>136481142
took me a while but here
I really want to get into milsim type games. Which ones would you guys suggest?
FPS & RTS varieties please. I'm thinking Arma 3 but all I see people streaming on Twitch is shit-tier "altis life"/Battle Royale shit & not actual milsim servers
>>136453485
And thats Why wesnoth playerbase is ded
>>136509398
For strategy Wargame titles there's not that much under the 'real time' category other than Graviteam Tactics: Mius front and maybe Combat Mission which is really better played its turn-based mode. There's a lot of hex titles like Flashpoint Campaigns but they are all turn-based.
For Arma there are no public 'milsim servers', just a lot of groups that have events every week or two. I'd recommend Broma and Murshun which are 4chan affiliated groups which have no barriers to entry and if after trying them they aren't realistic enough you can move on to other groups.
10
>>136509398
I'd tell you to check Squad, but its on early access and has optimization issues with AMD setups.
I used to hate artyspammers, but now I buy 14 Akatsiyas every game.
>>136515926
I watched it on Twitch & everyone talking was just a bunch of whiney man-children crying like a bunch of fucking faggots because they suck & kept dying so I'm going to avoid Squad.
Mfw realizing that making a wargame from scratch would be much more complicated than I thought. Maybe I should use one of those game engines they talk about.
>>136516432
There's a reason why people avoid it, you know.
Im thinking of getting one of the combat mission games.
Are they locked to 30fps?
And which is the best WW2 one?
>>136516034
4 m110 as USA as grown on me.
>>136518301
My main problem is that I do have some experience in programming (some scientific calculations for thesis), but not game dev. I can come up with how to make the basics of the game to work, stuff like handling hits, movement types etc, but no idea on how to tie them up together and make an interface apart from outputing a string "iterations complete: %c".
Convoy to page 1
>>136518984
Making a game from scratch is a huge time sink. Honestly its better to check what engines are available and see if there's one that fits your needs; the result might be less bloated or less prone to bugs. If you're trying to make something super niche you might be out of luck though.
>>136520669
>If you're trying to make something super niche you might be out of luck though.
I guess that's my case. Though I find FPRS as good as a wargame can get despite post-2.0.10 updates trying the hardest to ruin it.
Maybe I will make an Afghanistan campaign for it after I finish my 1968 one.
Na pervuyu stranitsu!
>>136518984
What are you using, c++ with Qt?
>>136523838
Tried C++ with SFML
>>136524062
It seems like the right library for the job. There should be a couple of drawing methods to create an interface and interact with it.
Can some of you fags que for the Burgers for the tank duel event
>>136520909
>espite post-2.0.10 updates trying the hardest to ruin it.
What the problem with them?
>>136528817
2.0.11.1 has the issue where Pact units can no longer hit anything and M109s became really overpowered.
2.0.11.2 has that fixed for red helis only and M109s became even more powerful now leaving no chance for Soviet player.
>page 9
Meanwhile I reworked the roads for the second scenario from anon's input.
>>136427446
>>136428956
>>136430416
But the most important thing is that Rossbach survivied
Are the Graviteam downloads in the OP just DLCs for the base game or do they work as stand alones?
bump
>>136534467
I should play RO2 again.
>page 7
>>136532781
The dlc link is for Graviteam Tactics Operation Star. The Mius Front link is a stand-alone game.
>>136536549
Couldn't someone upload Operation Star basegame too?
>>136510909
>ever recommending murshun or broma
literally fucking kill yourself you stupid nigger
they are DOG SHIT groups
>page 9
Meanwhile I've finished the second map, r8 please.
>>136538420
also, there's a link broken, the first one.
>>136543486
And a quick fix
>>136541493
Form a coherent counter argument as to why first.
>>136547712
Lmao
>>136548445
Thank you for your input.
>>136509398
FPS, there's Project Reality, which is a free standalone mod of BF2. It's got a shitload of content from factions, weapons, maps and so on. There's even Nam maps, and Falklands is coming soon. There's also a WWII beta.
Squad is the same idea, except it's early access, and you need to buy it. There's no content for it at the moment, so skip it for now.
Insurgency is okay, it's more of a tac-shooter. Lots of mods for it.
RTS there's Graviteam Tactics and Combat Mission, both have a fairly steep learning curve. If you want something simpler, Wargame and Men of War exist. There's plenty of hexshit to find. Older games like WinSPMBT an Close Combat are also really good. If you're looking for RTS, check the welcome games in the OP.
>>136547712
ok you want an argument?
they aren't milsim
they have terribly optimized missions
missions are long and uninteresting
modpack is 30gb
shacktac hud (lmao)
panimala is an actual asshole
>>136538420
>uploading 4.6GB with a 20KB/s connection
I would do it but honestly it would take forever and probably get a "sorry, your upload speed caused an error because its too slow, also fuck you". There's also the russian forum link if someone really wants Operation Star.
>>136437278
Maps are standart 100x80 size.
That >>136437765 guys is quite right. Use 'z'-key indirect fire, it doesn't require full LOS, for instance it can fire through smoke and trees. MG-teams are great at it.
Other than that - it really depends on the situation. In any way try to suppress enemy artillery first (if they're on-map, you can spot them by smoked zones in the enemy rear, if they're offmap it's more complicated - you need to have an offmap arty yourself, if it's not ordered to fire it will do counter-battery at the enemy firing arty. I don't remember full details, check the manual.
If you have TIs you can abuse smoke and be able to fire at enemy units that hasn't got it. Smoke generally can be a game changer here - you could smoke out a part of enemy defence and concentrate your fire on the rest so you could pick out defenders one by one. Remember that tank platoon leaders usually have some smoke shell. And another thing - usually you'd like to manually turn off automatic AI smoke screening when your armor comes under fire, it usually rather annoying during attack since you could lose LOS at unwanted time. It's done inside unit's stats view, select your unit and press spacebar.
Also, don't forget to set Target Reference Points - you'll be able to fire arty much quicker if have these. It's done at artillery page during the setup phase.
And a more 'gamey' advice.
When it comes to random attack/assault missions AI's deployment of troops is ofter rather silly - it generally fails to cover whole map height, so you can find a safe passage to enemy rear with your scouts and exploit it. When you cap some mission objectives AI generally tries to recapture them, so it's entirely possible that you'll be the one defending after that. And it becomes much easier then.
Some points that I could come up with quickly.
>>136538420
Here you go
https://thepiratebay.se/torrent/10729484/Achtung.Panzer.Shilovo.1942.READNFO-CODEX
>>136555583
are you going to post another radom campaign?
FLX wrote:
Here is a price proposition, if we can agree on it I'll review the availability based on that.
Basically, nerf to Leo1A5 and K1 and compressed price between 100$/150$
M1A2 --> 180 (~)
T-72BU --> 175 (-5)
T-90S --> 170 (-5)
Chally2 --> 170(~)
Leo2A5 --> 170 (~)
Kyu-Maru --> 165 (-5)
T-80UM --> 160 (-10)
Moderna --> 155 (-10)
STRV 121 --> 155 (-5)
Leclerc --> 160 (~)
PT-91 --> 155 (-5)
M1A1HC --> 155 (-5)
T-80U --> 145 (-10)
K1A1 --> 140 (-10)
ChallyMk3 --> 140 (-10)
T-72obr89 --> 135 (-15)
ZTZ-85-III --> 135 (-10)
M1A1HA --> 135 (-10)
T-72S --> 125 (-10)
Leo2A4 --> 125 (-10)
T-72S1 --> 120 (-10)
T-64BV --> 120 (-10)
Wilk M2 --> 120 (-5) (60% accuracy)
ChallyMk2 --> 115 (-10)
T-72obr87 --> 110 (-15)
M1A1 --> 115 (-5)
T-80BV --> 110 (-10)
T-64BV1 --> 110 (-10)
ChallyMk1 --> 105 (-10)
T-80A --> 110 (~)
T-64BM --> 100 (+10)
Leo2A1 --> 100 (-5)
T-72B --> 90 (-5)
K1 --> 90 (+5)
(...)
Chief Mk11 --> 80 (-5)
(...)
Leo1A5 --> 65 (+5)
(...)
Super M60 --> 60 (-5)
These actually look decent for once.
Fucking Landships
>>136557057
That actually looks rather decent.
>>136555583
Thanks for the tips although I figured most of it by now
Gonna try smoking the enemy positions next time
>>136556052
Not him but currently I'm playing a German campaign in Steel Panthers WW2 after I'm done with the current battle I'm gonna post some pics
Why are hit chances so low in SP ww2?
At 2+ hexes it always below 10%
At 1 or less it still only reaches 45%.
Not to mention the bullshit with reaction fire t34 taking out multiple panthers, but that is another issue
>>136561491
which weapons?
if your units stand still the hit chances are pretty good
>>136557097
is that a mod? looks rather unpolished to be an asset from the game
>>136557097
Arty food in WoT.
>>136561697
Regular German infantry squads
>>136563634
The customizable skirmish mod from the workshop
its pretty good but it seems he removed the tank only battles wich is kinda sa
>>136568438
which map isthat
>>136568438
which difficulty are you playing on
>>136569337
dont know
>>136569494
normal but I´m thinking about switching to hard
Testing the updated first scenario, looks like there is a need in using BMPs instead of BTRs
>>136568134
it fepends on los, moral, experience and on unit stance
moving troops have less accuracy than stationary squads
The accuracy also increases with consecutive shots on the same unit
>tfw you're being overrun by M60s and cavalry scouts and F-4s rek your HQs and AAs
>>136572640
it seems like you're about to get raped
ded
>>136574913
Nah, my ambush in outskirts of Plauen has rekt already two platoons of M60s who thought they'de be able to rush inside the town
>>136556052
I'm playing a premade US campaign now, maybe I'll will write AAR as I go.
>>136557057
rip t-64bm, you never existed but you will be remembered
The attack is mostly repelled, now most of efforts US puts in is to the south of the highway, but I have nothing to fight with on the north.
Russian armored vehicle
dead
>page 10
>>136578747
>t-72 chassis
It was a msta-s modification.
The... the msta-s doesn't have a t-72 chassis does it?
Why so ded?
>>136584810
Msta-S has T-72 chassis but T-80 like suspension.
my first mistake was playing 10v10
my second mistake was not quiting the second I saw a red tide of helis
is there anything more annoying than shit spammers?
How are victories calculated in Steel Panthers?
I just wone with 5k points and the enemy had 300
I lost about 160 men and 3 tanks and he lost ten times that, but somehow its only a marignal victory
plons
>>136591987
>>136592156
>>136555720
Thanks kind anon.
So i've been jerking around a little bit with GTOS just to see the differences from GTMF and i think the interface and graphic is actually better on the older title for some reason.
It just seems much more polished, the only things i don't like so far is that the unit status bar is cut in two at the bottom of the screen (instead of the vertical left side bar) and that the squads icons have no indicator to show if the units has viable AT weaponry or smoke.
And the enviroment appears to be more credible, Mius has that strange gloomy atmosphere with summer-like grass paired and cloudy weather that just don't cut it.
Also, is there a way to remove the horrible blue boxes surrounding units when selected in squad name mode?
this post contains no bmp
BTR > BMP
BTR
>>136411448
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ctnK7wdJmAo
Post videos itt that describe your style of play in wargame.
>>136613842
>Airspammer
Effective but extremely annoying to play against.
>>136614657
Not even just airspammer, I use almost exclusively napalm. I think it's offset by the fact I use only airborne infantry.
кoт
>>136456195
Just Russians and himself.
>>136456195
>calling it a gavin
Please stop with this shitty meme.
>>136621196
10
>>136626712
we need to have an argument about something.
You are planefu a shit.
You are tankfu a shit.
You are raifu a shit.
and most of all, you are nationality are subhuman scum that will be crushed by their most hated enemies and geopolitical rivals with the greatest of ease.
>Gavin
end thyself
The term 'Gavin' is some bullshit fabricated by popular culture. No body in an actual armed force calls it that.
>>136627298
Nice bait. Go back to your own general planefag. Stop spreading your fony balagona here
>>136627035
Fuck you mig 29 is great
Fuck you abrams is undeadable
Fuck you my raifu is better than you raifu
My nationality is the best it is you country that will be easily crushed by its enemies
>>136588019
People who don't know how to counter and whine about getting stomped by a fairly straightforward strategy?
>>136628825
Go to bed Mike
Only France could make an uglier OICW.
You know the drill
Bumb
>>136637657
>mfw my country operates the most BMP-3s after Russia
>>136578747
>>136584810
>>136587735
MSTA-S is based on T-80 chassis, with T-72 engine.
>>136640776
Your MoD picked a good IFV to spend dem oil bux on. If you have to import for IFVs, the BMP-3 is the way to go.
>>136642170
T-72 hull geometry, T-72 engine and transmission, T-80 suspension.
>>136642720
>T-72 hull geometry
look at the driver viewports
>>136644942
And? Engine compartment and the rest is totally from T-72's
![251060_screenshots_20160327151200_1[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/770AM68.jpg "251060_screenshots_20160327151200_1[1].jpg")
T-70 tooth
9
10
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_U9JjGseXIs
>page 8
>>136652684Cкoлькo paз я тeбe гoвopил нe тaщить cюдa гoвнo c хapкaчa, a ты oпять блядь пpинёc лoкaльный кoнтeнт кoтopый пoймy тoлькo я? Tы eбaнyтый?
>>136653575
Mmm... Vodka.
>>136653575
[spoler]Hy я бы нe cкaзaл, чтo пpям лoкaльный, вce и тaк пoнятнo. Ho вce paвнo тaщить нe cтoит, этo дa.[/spoiler]
>>136654434
>
%%:^)%%
>>136652684
Only a Russian could be behind this awfully beautiful
