>FAQ
http://pastebin.com/fcf25Vi9
>Arena Commander
Overview: https://robertsspaceindustries.com/comm-link/transmission/14718-Star-Citizen-Alpha-113-Is-Live (will be outdated hopefully later today)
Download: https://robertsspaceindustries.com/download
Manual: https://robertsspaceindustries.com/media/hwb5x45eghhelr/source/AC-Manual-1-1-V7.pdf
Tweaks & FAQ: http://pastebin.com/QRWNvEVD
>Jump Point Current Issue
https://robertsspaceindustries.com/media/e3qapawod26kur/source/JumpPoint_03-11_Nov-15_Meeting-Places.pdf
>Jump Points
http://pastebin.com/Cd9wQ9YB
>"Holiday 2015 Goyim!"
https://robertsspaceindustries.com/comm-link/transmission/15114-MISC-Reliant-Variants
https://robertsspaceindustries.com/comm-link/transmission/15123-Holiday-Livestream-Ship-Gallery (sexy new freelancer)
Pupil to Planet https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-yLTm8DZ8s4 [Embed]
>Weeklys
Ten for the Chinaman: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oiXlK8UtLhg [Embed]
The Amazing Abent: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jhzEA15KH8o [Embed]
Around the Girth: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o0s3GMSfDko [Embed]
I approve this thread.
Cutlass is for niggers.
>>125656203
And Probably flown by Goatfuckers too. It is after all the Technical of the Star Citizen world.
>>125656221
Well I just copy pasted the other faggots OP and removed some of the less relevant shit and memes, guess it was more cancerous than I anticipated
>Reading /vg/ OPs.
>>125656335
And you added your fucking referal.
Get cancer and die.
>>125656056
>>>>>>>>>>>>30fps.
>>125656409
No Faggot, I am not referralcode faggot, I reported referralcode faggot for advertising, cleaned up his Op a little bit and made a new thread, Evidently I should have actually read the entire thing and cleaned it up more completely.
>>125656203
>>125656248
How many "People" do you think could be fit inside a cutlass while studiously ignoring the limitations of life support?
>>125656737
Hopefully a lot
It's be neat to see a bunch of shitters pour out and try to board a big ship
This game is pretty fucking fun, wish vanduul swarm would get harder quicker though.
Are there any MLG certified flying guides out there?
>>125656235
Fuck that's nice. I only saw their trailer at first, which I really thought wasn't in-game (and probably wasn't really, I'm guessing they used some editor to make the transitions a bit nicer).
>>125657187
Reposting link to uncompressed trailer cus faggot thread is RIP.
http://www.gamersyde.com/hqstream_star_citizen_from_pupil_to_planet-36350_en.html
>>125655981
Reverse the Worst: http://imperialnews.network/2015/12/reverse-verse-episode-74/ (nobody wants to watch that shit)
>>STABILITY CONFIG FILE<<
http://pastebin.com/Mevt7uEK
here's the shit the OP left out in his quest to repair his ass
>>125656335
>stability config that's required to not crash every 20 minutes
>not relevent
you're an embarrassment
>>125657224
>uncompressed
>H.264
Mate.
>mfw OP is angry enough to omit info after being so bum-blasted
>>125657224
>not reposting in-engine one cus faggot thread is RIP
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=69ck049Bg_I
Denial posters need to be pre-emptively struck
anyone got the pastebin to the logon.jsn? help a space niggah out
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNGq1BkPINU&feature=youtu.be&t=940
>Find memest derelict spook stations
>Hurl objects towards players from behind in zero G
>Fly past light sources
>People hire marines to root you out
>Post it again
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zt3s-oHlIvM
>>125655981
Damn, these guns are big.
>>125655981
>those retarded as fuck missiles on wing tips are still there
Sasuga CIG.
>$195
This thing is now officially the best Multicrew ship out there for the money. It's only 30 bucks more than a Superhornet, and a good deal less than all but the shitter Constellation. You could buy THREE Starfarers for the price of an 890j and it actually packs serious Dakka, they didn't even mention the 2xS6 Dorsal Turret or the 2x 4xS4 Ass turrets. Caterpillar, Conny, Tally,Cutlassand 890 fags BTFO.
How do I fix dank freezing every few seconds in AC? I DON'T have an AMD CPU.
>>125657886
Anon, It's literally a flying bomb with a cockpit.
>>125657886
2x 4xS2**
>>125657972
see the stability config the faggop left out in his rectal pain >>125657240
>>125657519
Here you go bud
http://pastebin.com/Bxycdm2x
>>125657972
Wait 2weeks for 2.1 :^)
>>125657972
If you're using SLI disable SLI.
>>125657519
As long as you don't spam your avatars everywhere, we can work something out.
>>125658043
thanks babe
>>125658007
You say that like its a bad thing? Imagine the HOLLAH SNACKBAR potential.
>buy a reliant
>not notified when the variants come out
Wewlads.
So I see from the concept art that at least two of them now have beds, even though they vehemently protested that the Reliant wouldn't have one at all. Anyone know if the base model will have one? Can I upgrade mine at a better cost than 75 jewgolds since I have the base with LTI?
>>125658146
Why not contribute and share yours? Unless you just bought a starter pack that is.
>>125657240
Added this to the "official" 4chins repository without the faggotry and extra lines.
http://pastebin.com/MBcknHRt
>also need someone to write a update for the FAQi cant be fucked
>>125658214
Yes CCUs are available in the upgrades page.
Also, the Cargo Reliant does not have a bed because the Interiors on the variants are the cargo hold on the Kore, and it remains to be seen if the Militia variant has a bed.
You can upgrade your Kore to a Tana for just 15 shekels, and so far It looks to be a solid upgrade over the Mustang Delta at the same price. With dual magazine fed missile launchers instead on rocketpods and Turreted S2s(Which probably means the ability to fit fixed S3s, hype)/Fixed S1s instead of the reverse on the Delta.
>Reliant variants have gook names
Into the melting pot it goes.
>>125658030
Cheers m8.
Does the .cfg really go in \Starcitizen and not \Starcitizen\public? Seems really counterintuitive.
>>125658541
I made that before the public version actually came out, >>125658428 is probably correct. it goes in public.
>>125658442
Isn't the Tana the Militia variant? If so, as far as I can tell from the concept art it might well have two beds.
I also love how they said over and over that the Reliant wouldn't have standing room in the back, and now it totally does.
And yeah, the Tana is definitely the upgrade I'm going for, even though I already have a military ship too.
>>125658727
why is the military one the cheapest, anyway? I may buy one for a friend
>Reliant was billed as a starter ship
>none of them come with a game package
wew lad
>>125658803
Well technically the Kore base model is the cheapest, but yeah the Tana is the next cheapest and will probably be the one the vast majority of people pick up.
>>125658876
Isn't that because they're still in concept, and don't have a hangar model ready? Like, if you buy a game-pack, they have to give you a ship or something, or so I thought, and that's why it's not a game pack as of now. When it's hangar ready, more than likely will.
>>125658516
>Manufacturer: Musashi Industrial & Starflight Concern
>>125657886
>People actually believe that a SxS4 and above turret is going to be any use at all tracking fighters, and won't have a traverse rate slower than Ben's walking pace
meme supreme
>>125658940
never stopped them before. typically they just sub in an aurora or a mustang, or a hornet for the larger pledges until the ship you bought is hangar ready. no reason it should be different for starters.
>>125658250
all i got is a sabre and pooraura which is already listed
>>125659005
[warps behind you] Osoi [activates twin Katana Sakurasun plasma guns] Nothing personnel, konoyaro.
>>125659012
>butthurt cu©klass fag thinking remote turrets won't be plenty quick
>>125659134
Lol share that sexy Sabre then mang, be a bro.
Btw I'm the one maintaining the pastebin.
>>125659346
>Posted in a desperate panic from my Redeemer®
>>125659358
>filename
is there a way to disable the helmet frame?
>>125659505
What, you don't like immersion or something?
>>125659505
No because FIDELITY.
I wish they would, its all they really need to do for VR/TIR to work
Who 315p here?did anyone else even buy this ship?
>>125659570
>>125659607
really? You can't disable it?
>>125659481
What are you trying to tell me with that image?
>>125659607
>I wish they would, its all they really need to do for VR/TIR to work
No it isn't.
>>125659570
Thats just an issue with FOV.
>>125659649
I upgraded a 300i to one
>i have no idea what to feel right now
>>125659505
take off the helmet.
>>125659726
What is the current FOV
>>125659720
that you are probably fucked when ben reads that post
>young and passionate
>always had people around to point him in the right direction
>wasn't working in the industry for a decade
>became a greedy cunt only interested in money
>finally gets a chance to make his dream true without anyone else meddling with it
>it's trash
Croberts is truly Lucas of gamedev.
>>125659969
70, CryEngine default.
>>125659982
Head bob is the key to all this
>>125659982
>disney needs to buy cig and make the bdsse
>>125660060
Go to bed, gramps
>>125659937
How?
>>125660287
I think it was a joke.
>>125660060
>>125659982
I TRY SPINNING, THAT'S A GOOD TRICK
I may have gone too far in a few places
do you think Sandi "put the coon in an airtight balloon" Gardiner gives good head?
>>125660576
That's the first thing they teach girls in model schools.
>>125658043
M50 is so fucking fun
Can't be bothered with all the offline PTU steps but free flight is blackout city
>>125660935
>Can't be bothered with all the offline PTU steps
Just play drone sim, accomplishes the same thing..
>>125659649
I have one along with my vast fleet of MISC and Best Dynamics ships because I like the "Bastard offspring off the F-117 Nighthawk and a Lambo" look, but time(The 300 series rework) will tell if I keep it, the interior is completely shit tier. I also picked up three of them With LTI for friends way back in the Original Backer days since they're the cheapest real ship with a stock jump drive(Auroras and Mustangs Need Not Apply).
>>125660935
>offline PTU steps
nigga... the PTU is over. everyone can play it.
>>125661437
No shit sherlock. Try using other player's login data on the live server and see how it goes.The offline PTU doesn't connect with the SC servers so you can login into other players hangars and try their ships.
>>125661797
oh, didn't realize it still worked. the mfiddy is indeed fun. just be careful landing it
https://robertsspaceindustries.com/pledge/Standalone-Ships/MISC-Reliant-Sen-Researcher
Why on Earth is this garbage so expensive?
Why would anyone want a second seat in a "starter" ship?
>>125662083
The second seat is so the GF that you don't have or the kid you wish you didn't have can play the game with you without having to learn the complicated shit like "How to fly in 6dof without dying" and "Which button makes me not get exploded by CS missiles"
And the Sen is 75 bucks because the world is full or Carebabbys who want to play the game with the delusion that they can do so in a completely non-combat role, expect to see lots of those "Exploring" the safest, most heavily patrolled sections of the Terra System.
>>125662317
Samefag here.
I picked up a Tana for the Specific Purpose of pretending I am Jango Fett, Now I just need to get a minion to RP Boba.
>>125658043
does this offline 2.0 thing still work? i never did it before
>>125657886
Im interested. Do you carry only fuel? or it can operate as a cargo truck?
in hangar
>Aurora
>Redeemer
>Freelancer DUR
I am looking something sub 200dollaroos mark. I am not great at space pewpew, so was thinking of superhornet for beefytank, or a cargo ship for trade..or maybe that cancer ambulance cutlass?
Advice?
>>125662317
Then she would need a game package as well, and by then, I would already have a better two seater.
Again, what's the point,projecting retard?
>>125662652
Yep, still working. The PU part is pretty much hit or miss, i never got in Crusader but i could still use it to test ships for free in Arena Commander or Free Flight.
>>125662852
I think you're in error if you assume that ShitterHornets are going to make you good at dogfighting when it actually matters
>>125662083
It might be the best small exploration ship. and it comes with science fuckery.
>>125663038
I know, oh well, ill be the trading logistic guy. I wonder how big is Starfarers cargohold..
>Having a Vanguard variant means you get nothing in hangar, only Wardenfags
REEEEEEEEE
>>125662946
how are you supposed to receive brojobs in the shitterhornet when the second seat is behind you?
>>125663119
Moderately sized in addition to the liquid pods.
Smaller overall than the HULL series of similar size, but far better armored / armed and with more utility (refuelling mid-flight and shit)
>>125663050
Whatever that ends up being...
Fuck, they got Gimli? That guy is cool.
are any ships free to fly this week ?
>>125663784
There's always free ships to fly my friend.
http://pastebin.com/Bxycdm2x
>>125660119
Implying VII isn't fanfiction tier
>>125659358
sabre is not active yet
2.1 WHEN
>>125664797
Soonish
>secret cutlass discord chat now has a dev
>he's being locked up in a a single channel so he can't see the salt mine that is the general chat
My sides
horizons is getting butchered holy fuck
>>125667252
Chris really did blow the lid off E:D with that procedural planet tech.
E:D has a loading screen, (a literal black screen that hangs while it loads) and you're stuck in a vehicle. Even if its early days yet, They're getting rocked.
So with the Freelancer rework, have they changed the crew to operate it? I originally got it so I could solo around with trade and explore, and they keep making the ship bigger. Do I have to have more crew now besides just myself?
>>125667438
Theres no reason you can't do the FL's primary duties solo.
Just don't expect to have as fine control on things like weapons or shields without a dedicated operator.
>>125667403
>Chris really did blow the lid off E:D with that procedural planet tech.
>E:D has a loading screen
And SC crashed on launch once and secodn time right after warping to POI during stream :^)
Not even E:D shill, but you're hilariously delusional.
>>125667438
I don't think so, since weapon hard points haven't changed. The S4s should have a pretty broad arc, leaving only the small manned turret in the back for extra defense directly aft (most people will likely just put a tractor beam on it).
Extra crew could be handy for managing damage/shields and that turret, but otherwise I don't see how it would have difficulties with just a pilot.
>>125667782
Uh, yeah.
Ones crashy and in alpha, one is meant to be a full release and still shit, on top of the $60 DLC being buggy as fuck.
>just sold my Niggerlass
Goddamn that felt so good. Like took a huge dump I've been holding whole day.
I am finally free.
>>125667850
>one costs 15k dooridaroos to play and win and is never coming out
>the other has $60 DLC
Hmmm
I DON'T KNOW WHAT'S REAL AND WHAT'S A SIM POD
>>125668093
am I being rused?
>>125669109
probably yes
>>125668424
10/10
>>125667252
yet it has 70% positive reviews. I can click on the negative reviews tab for any game
>>125668424
>no connection lost window
>>125670308
I wanted to make it a gif with the "Star Citizen has stopped working " window over it, but I ended up liking the <USE> better in the center
>>125670039
I'm looking through them
Most of the negative reviews are objective criticisms of the full jew pricing model, total and utter lack of content, or steam integration.
Almost all the positive reviews are "its fun", or pure salt like pic related
>>125670039
why are you so retarded
>>125670491
look all them positive reviews, sc shill
>>125662852
>>125663119
The Starfarer is Listed as having like "3200" ish cargo capacity, which is relatively high. It's unclear if that is counting the external cargo or not, but It has been confirmed that the external refueling system can be swapped out and replaced with bulk cargo boxes, making it into a solid choice for a medium freighter, more heavily armed and armored than the Hull C and like more maneuverable as well, if not by much.
>>125670491
not the same guy, but it is funny that you marked all those negatives as helpful.
>>125670491
>SC defence force from plebbit upvoting negative reviews
That's some salt alright.
>>125670617
All those ~120 positive reviews
meanwhile more than 3000 people agree with that first negative one, the most criticial of the game.
>>125670643
>>125670672
because i own the game
because i was part of /edg/ i feel ripped off by braben and Frontier for paying 60 bucks for a shitty empty game and even was refused a refund
so yeah i am biased but you might get why now tho
is it all my fault for buying into braben jawline, yup
>>125670707
helpful != agree
>>125662946
My point is its the multicrew ship for poorfags, and yea, Crewman number gril needs a game package too, but that just means a 30 dollar aurora. can you Imagine the assmad that would ensue if you put your grilfriend into the shitty space sperm and she got totally shitcanned by the first NPC pirate she encountered? Better to Have her be the Pretty face on your Twitch stream while you fly the ship and aimed the Camera or whatever.
and you KNOW that a bunch of Forumdads are gonna have to get a Tana to play Jango and Boba with their wretched squealing spawn.
>>125670952
Now this is autism
It's strange to see damage control for one game in the general of another.
Could you guys take it elsewhere?
>There are people that honestly believe their Idris and Javelins won't get raped by torpedo's and bombers
>There are people that think they'll be able to fly one solo without decent screens
I'm gonna have so much fun making people who spent $18000 dollarydoos rage quit when their bourgeois barges get btfo by a raggedytag group of fighter bombers.
>>125670981
my sides
>>125670887
You're in SC thread, buddy. So yeah, it's your fault for being a gullible moron. And it's pretty obvious that you didn't even learn anything from that mistake, otherwise you wouldn't be here.
>>125671018
Yeah, not sure why the ED guys are even here desu
>>125670959
>Better to Have her be the Pretty face on your Twitch stream while you fly the ship and aimed the Camera or whatever.
SC does not lend itself to being a twitch cancer game, anon.
Its something that actually requires attention
>>125671049
>hypocrisy, the post
>>125671026
>there are people that honestly theorycraft so much that they think they know how the gameplay will be once the game releases and already go through every scenario in their head about how each encounter will play out with fighters/bombers/carriers
>>125671018
How about you take your fanboism back to reddit isntead?
>>125671079
Mostly to shitpost out of a deep sense of inferiority.
Like this guy here >>125671148
>>125671049
i own a starter pack thats all, i should be fine
sorry for bringing another game into here tho
>>125671093
>hypocrisy, the post
Who said I bought the game myself :^)
>>125671253
Sucking dick for a game package is worse than spending $45.
>>125671253
>:^)
Truly ebin
>>125670981
>reviews are done by people who own and have actually played the game, 70% of which have only positive things to say aboout it
>3000 people who can't afford the game agreeing with a negative review 'cause they can't play the game
hmm I wonder which group of people are honest and which are butthurt that everything in life isn't free
>>125671391
>everything in life isn't free
Dads arent allowed to post on 4chan
Please retreat to reddit for your own mental well being.
>>125671324
>he never sucked dick
What are you, gay or something?
>>125671391
Your argument might have a leg to stand on if it wasn't for both the steam and standalone versions.
Not everyone who bought the game bothered to add it to steam when it eventually went live on there too. I didn't.
>>125671463
Its not gay if its a feminine dick
>>125671461
>Dads arent allowed to post on 4chan
summer already?
>>125671391
>oh boy what a great day it is
>lets go on steam and check games i cant afford
>lets downvote everything i cant afford
what the fuck are you saying dude
>>125671509
You know how I know you don't even own E:D let alone have visited /edg/
>>125671639
was that a question?
>>125671731
No.
>>125671093
>SC does not lend itself to being a twitch cancer game, anon.
Boy are you in for a rude awakening. Just because no one streams the buggy assed half functional alpha doesn't mean no one is going to stream the game. and people DO stream the buggy assed half functional alpha. And there are only going to be more as time passes, hardware improves, and SC hit full exposure as it comes together. Mark my words, by the time were closing up Beta there is gonna be Streamers and normalfag cancer everywhere, for a whole slew of reasons. Star Wars coming back is a big one, but more importantly, SC is going to be Interesting to outsiders in the way that EVE is interesting to outsiders, but SC its going to be a MUCH better spectacle to watch.
>>125671026
My Distinctly phallus shaped Clear Sky Bourgeois Butt Blasters are ready.
>>125671093
>SC does not lend itself to being a twitch cancer game, anon.
News Van Reliant says otherwise. THERE'S LITERALLY A SHIP FOR TWITCH WHORES.
>>125672127
But they would have to fly it.
Unlike that shitty card game which they can fit into a 120x120px window and have their tits mostly filling the screen.
>>125672242
>have their tits mostly filling the screen
I'm not very up to date on twitch and the culture there but is this common? Because if so I would like to know more.
>>125668424
high level
>>125672372
I think they recently banned something to do with this, like bikinis or whatever.
But I think they just ended up migrating somewhere else or just being ever-so-slightly less obvious about it.
>>125672242
>implying their army of white knights won't pilot for them
>implying they won't be masturbating during live streams on cap deck of the Idris one of white knights own
>>125672479
>just the right level of trashy
This needs to be investigated. Thank you anon.
>>125672552
But thats great anon.
Its perfect bomber bait.
>>125672479
jesus they might as well just start sucking dicks for "donations"
>>125672242
NIGGER, ITS A TWO SEAT SHIP, they have their betacuck friendzoned liberal "Boyfriend" fly the ship and do all the work while they literally sit in the side seat and talk. The Whole point of the Mako is to allow the "Personality" to do nothing but Talk and MAYBE aim the camera.
>>125672610
>he still thinks his $250 bombertrash is enough to go against $5000 cap
Get 19 more and then you'll stand a chance.
I haven't played star citizen nor been on /scg/ since last year christmas. What have I missed? both with the game and here? what's the newest meme? I know back then making fun of people that got avengers was pretty cool.
>>125672729
Well I'm enjoying popping Connies in a Merlin, so why bother
so what's the point of good fps combat (if it even will be good) if there's perma death? doesn't this just encourage people to just run away from fights?
>>125672958
Why have shitty mechanics when you can have good ones?>implying SC is good mechanically in any way
>>125672912
the new memeships now are the cutlass and gladius
>>125672958
>Whats the point of dogfighting if it encourages people to run away from fights?
>Whats the point of booting up the game if you might lose?
>Whats the point in living?
>>125672912
MISC is the new hotness, Aegis is being ruined by F42, Drake doesn't exist.
>>125673110
>Cutlass
>new meme
Hey guys, with the recent release of Horizons for ED I've decided that FDevs jewery knows no bounds, how do the SC devs compare?
Are they better or are all space sims fated to be corrupted by zionism?
>>125673110
right, right how come? like with the avenger it was because it's huge engine (which was bigger then a 300i) somehow fit inside such a small spaceIs it still like this? I'm to lazy to check.
I want a superhornet senpai..looks straight out of battlestargalactica :3
>>125672958
it means (theoretically) that people will only fight over shit that matters, rather than just leeroying into the battlezone or shooting people over trade chat arguments.
>>125673174
can you get headshot in a dogfight?
>Whats the point in living?
I ask myself this every morning
>>125673228
>how do the SC devs compare?
Also in regards to>>125672912
Are those three meme clans (kong, ved and something else I forgot) still around? What happened to them?
>>125673228
$45 for the game which includes all the $60 'expansions' Frontier is going to tell, and SQ42 isn't a bad deal, anon.
They sell expensive ships and weapons, and it currently a bit P2W. But its pretty unbalanced as fuck right now, period. Its not like the more you pay, the better shit you get, its just all over the place. Its also entirely optional.
I think they're better than Frontier by miles, but they've yet to prove they're un-jewy, in my opinion.
>>125673393
Ballistic rounds to the cockpit are still an instant kill.
>>125673293
so it's not meant to be fun is what you're saying?
>>125673471
>They sell expensive ships and weapons, and it currently a bit P2W. But its pretty unbalanced as fuck right now, period. Its not like the more you pay, the better shit you get, its just all over the place. Its also entirely optional.
H-how are the F2P ships?
Own cutlass blue, avenger package since pre alpha and a carrack.
I'm not happy with my avenger.
Since the blue is basically a bigger avenger I feel like upgrading the avenger. Gladius, hornet or sabre?
(What's the loaner for sabre?)
>>125673592
..what
>>125673264
i never flew the gladius but from what i've heard it's flying like shit in 2.0 and it's outgunned by a ton of other cheaper ships
the cutlass is still the cutlass
>>125673603
>own Nigress Blue
Get rid of it.
>>125673431
Yes, they are still around.
We don't talk about them though, to orgpost is a offense.
>>125673630
Sorry, phrased that wrong.
Say I buy the base game and nothing else, don't pay for the premium ships and such, how are the free ships that I only need to spend in game currency to fly?
>>125673603
>Since the blue is basically a bigger avenger
Literally, now. Same number of cells, making the Blue currently a total waste of space.
>>125673431
Yes, we still exist.Love, Ved.
hey /scg/, I'm one of those folk who backed ages ago and hasn't much touched the game yet.
I hopped in 2.0 and wanted to see if I could go from planet to space in a single transition, or maybe do some missions, but I can't seem to get my ship out of the hanger, and I can't seem to locate it on the arc planet.
How do?
Thanks.
>>125673761
>hanger
you patch your game
click on crusader olisar, and play the game
no planetary stuff ingame yet
>>125673726
>how are the free ships that I only need to spend in game currency to fly?
That literally covers all ships.
Every single one of them is available for in-game currency, none of them are 'premium'.
But the Aurora / Mustang, the ships which come with a 'cheap' $45 game package are okay. They're not great, but they're starter ships. Mustang is fun to fly.
>>125673726
>premium ships
What premium ships?
why the fuck is the entire thread mad at the cutlass? What did I miss?
>>125673726
there are no premium ships
once the game releases you can get every single ship in game by playing the game
>>125673726
Every ship can be bought in-game, It's just some NEETbux aristocrats that keep forgetting it
>i will dominate the galaxy in muh 500$ ship!
>>125673847
I'm updated to 2.0, if that's what you mean. I'll take a looksee and see if I can find it again.
>>125673920
>What did I miss?
Living under a rock for 3 years?
>>125673750
>Ved
I thought you lot were busy enjoying Vision?
Did you crawl back to SC now that your lord and savior Braben has abandoned you?
>>125673969
just start the game up, press join universe or whatever, then you get hangar/crusader and you pick the latter
then you load for ages and can just mess around with some basic shit, spawn a ship, get in, do some mission, jump into some other players ship, shoot him, do zero g fighting etc
>>125673920
The Cutlass is shit, there is nothing to be mad about.
>>125673920
>What did I miss?
Last 2 years of development?
>>125673969
If you've got 2.0 you shouldn't be loading into your hangar anyway. The "Universe" option on new shiny main menu, then "Port Olisar" takes you to 2.0's main feature, Crusader.
>>125674001
>Implying E:D is good
We're a group, not a hivemind
>>125673969
You load up the game, click on Universe and then Port Olisar.
>>125673851
>>125673870
>>125673956
>>125673964
Oh, okay, I wasn't actually aware of that.
So it's more of a pay-not-to-grind deal than "I've got this $500 murdermachine and you can never get anything close unless you pay too"?
That sounds a lot better than FDev and VISION, honestly.
>>125673984
it's hard to lick robert's balls as hard as everyone else here for 3 years straight. good on you, though
>>125674036
>>125674075
>>125674089
Ahh, that explains it. When I tried the port, it told me there was some sort of error and wouldn't let me load in. Thanks boys.
>>125674126
pay-not-to-grind is pretty much the deal, yeah.
But from what they've said, the actual ships aren't the most expensive part, there is still a large amount of improvement to be put into the hulls to make them better or specialized.
We'll see.
>>125674139
The Cutlass has been shit for the entire time it's existed.
I'm sorry if you're some E:D newfriend whose crawling into the general asking the stupid questions.
>>125674126
>pay-not-to-grind
Yes. That's the extent of the P2W in SC
>>125674126
it might be.
Could also be that their $500 murdermachine (with LTI) will utterly annihilate your shit until you grind out a $500 murdermachine of your own, but you also have to pay more to maintain yours than his.
The hope is that they'll balance out ships better so that their $500 ship is only a mild advantage
>launch 2.0
>black screen
>not responding
gg cig at its finest
>>125674037
>>125674039
I just never really paid attention to the cutlass in particular because I was more interested in the freelancer and considering that it was one of the first hanger ready ships and is currently one of the early 2.0 flyable ships I don't get the issue. I have one and as soon as the freelancer becomes flyable I'll probably just turn her into store credits but it's not like that shit is relevant before the PU launches.
>>125674401
>but you also have to pay more to maintain yours than his
Are you that one guy who always talks out of his ass because I think you're that one guy who talks out of his ass.
>>125674289
I doubt that people will actually actively grind for bigger ships just because they are bigger ships. For solo exploration most of the cheaper ships will probably be way more convenient and as a fighter pilot you are going to gravitate towards Hornets.
>>125673692
>>125673750
What ship should I replace it with?
>>125674668
I hope so, i want to be able to spend connie cash levels just for outfitting smaller ships.
>>125674578
>free insurance
>free hangar fees on starting planet
>free repair drone
>>125674720
Vanguard.
>>125675018
The drone might be free, but the cost to use it isn't.
You will likely not stay near your starting planet.
Insurance at LTI level is said to be dirt cheap.
>>125675137
But the bot itself is free.
And no matter how small the fee is, it's still something original backer won't have to deal with.
Stop denying it, it's a fact that backers have advantage over other players.
>>125675013
yeah, I mean it's still p2w bullshit to some extent. LTI was a mistake in my opinion, I know why they did it but I still don't agree with that bullshit. I generally hate communities that are populated by fucking whales that bought themselves into their status with a big pile of real money. But it looks like bigger ships will not necessarily be straight upgrades to smaller ships. I personally favor maneuverability over the massive utility bigger ships will have.
>>125675069
Are they up for sale again?
Which variant?
So, should I just go with the $30 starter pack?
That gets me access to all the content, right?
>>125675305
Not denying it, just saying the advantage is hardly significant in my hot opinion.
>>125675314
LTI probably won't end up being that amazing, considering it won't even cover the most expensive parts of ships.
>>125675348
yes
>>125675585
epic XD
>>125675371
LTI will cover the stock loadout
Which will be a advantage for ships like the vangaurd, saber, and super hornet.
If we never had these near and actual military spec fighters, then I'd agree.
But LTI on "as close to mil spec as legally possible" SH and "miliary spec under UEE's new frontier [powercreeep] protection act" vanguard are cause for concern.
>>125675348
Yup, $30 for the full game.Using STAR-RWDJ-36X9 gives you 5000 extra credits in-game
So this game has more features or less than Space Engineers?
Can you build things?
>>125675851
Fuck off newfriend.
Do you own damn research.
>>125675710
fuck off with this advertising shitSTAR-6RRS-V2QM
>>125675851
>Can you build things?
No.
It's not minecraft in space. It's Wing Commander/EVE/Freelancer
>>125675904
>>125675710
>>125675426
Thanks anons
I'll do a coin flip to see which referral code (I assume that's what they are) I use.
>>125675945
of course we will be able to build things in space. In this game you can do ANYTHING. Chris Roberts said so and I believe every fucking retard that tells me stupid shit :^)
>>125675945
So it doesn't have more features than space engineers?
Oh is this that vaporware game that a bunch of the employees shit on for wasting money on things like hiring mark hamil?
Hoo boy, and i thought the KSP guys were in for disappointment.
>>125676038
here is your (you)
gris roperts :DDD
>>125675585
I like the new freelancer.
>>125676038
blew your load early desu imo senpai
>>125676024
>Chris Roberts said so and I believe every fucking retard that tells me stupid shit
That's not even English.
>>125675694
Super Hornet stock loadout is absolute shit
no reason to think the vanguard or saber won't be equally sub-optimal.
So if chris roberts is just making another version of wing commander does that mean all he's capable of is imitating himself?
>>125676412
No, Wing Commander was actually good.
>>125676341
that's grammatically correct
>>125675585
>People still posting this like anyone cares any more
I only own a freelancer max. It's my favourite ship by far
Elite Dangerous CEO;
"What both Star Citizen and Elite Dangerous are trying to do is very hard indeed. Both games are incredibly ambitious. I am proud and excited about what we are doing, but what they are doing is ambitious too, and I am looking forward to playing Star Citizen when it is finished. What we are both doing is new; we are trailblazing. The scope of both is vast and quite different, and neither have been done before, so there is no right answer for either of the approaches. It is frustrating to see some of the criticism of Star Citizen online. We should applaud when someone tries something that is hard, that hasn’t been done, not discourage them."
>Spacebros confirmed
Why does this game generate so much salt?
>>125676826
>owning a freelancer piratebait
>>125676848
E:D isn't doing anything new, and its not ambitious. At least, nowhere near the same level as SC.
>>125676848
>E:D
>ambitious
>>125676848
B-but muh console wars neo-/v/ shit :(
>>125676864
In space no one can meme your salt
>>125676826
Freelancer is all you need anon. Perfect ship.
>>125673646
The Gladius was top tier (IMO) in 1.3 but is not very good in 2.0.
I don't know if the thrusters are bugged or what, but it handles like a cow.
>>125676948
>>125676952
>Star Citizen
>ambitious
>b-but I want to be a spacetrucker ;_;
fuck off neo /v/
>>125677097
Well meme'd
Salt is all we have as we wait for one game and are ravaged by vision in another.
At least there's light at the end of this tunnel.
