ITT: Well-optimized games
- Home
- Board: /v/ - Video Games
- Reading: ITT: Well-optimized games
ITT: Well-optimized games
>>345419735
I'm surprised it never gets below 30fps on my 560ti
People say this is one of the worst console ports of all time, with issues ranging from a 30FPS soft lock to Denuvo being used to missing visual effects to abysmal memory issues. It still is hard to run to this day.
...and then Black Ops 3 came out, and made this look like Devil May Cry 4.
>>345419735
>not even 60 fps in an empty and devoid of life street
>>345420639
>1440p on what is effectively a 5 year old GPU
>>345420169
RIP FOX ENGINE
>>345420035
I had zero problem with AK after the first day-one patch that removed the 30 FPS lock. Granted I have a pretty good machine (i7 @ 4.2 ghz, 980 ti, 16 gb RAM, SSD), so maybe I'm just lucky.
>>345421004
>16 gb RAM
That's pretty much it right there.
>>345420795
you would enjoy the game more at a higher fps. it's science
I'm thinking of getting this from Walmart once I get enough money from my job
What are the best settings for a 290X?
>>345419735
on pc launch I got some terrible stuttering/ freezing no matter what the graphical settings I used. Not sure if they've adressed this since.
>>345420035
>no rain effects for PC version
>PS4 puts them indoors
>>345419735
Man,that picture looks so artificial and fake
>>345421186
You need at least 8GB of RAM to run it properly, that's probably it.
>>345421274
That was patched in shortly after launch. It looks like it's a JUST situation on every platform, ironically it looks like the Xbone had it best.
>>345421306
That's probably because it's a screenshot of a video game and video games don't look like real life
>>345421306
You know this is a video game board, right?
blizzards engine for overwatch.
anything source
MT framework or whatever it's called for DMC4 that shits amazing.
>>345421534
I'm pretty sure MT Framework was backed by witchcraft.
I ran Just Cause 2 on my shit laptop and it played great, to my amazement, especially with all the shit happening in that game.
>>345421534
i get random dips in overwatch
>>345419735
And then you go online and it all goes to shit, even in solo lobbies.
Metal gear solid /V/
>>345422197
You blind m8?
>>345421534
does source count when you have to spend one minute every ten minutes to load a new level
Quality bait. Thanks for the kek
>>345419735
>drive by some trees
>drop from 60fps to 30
>>345422303
That's strange, I get 3,3GB peaks for no reason. What are your settings? HDD or SSD?
>>345421073
You're missing the point anon
>tfw you're on a 3-series CPU, you cheaped out 3-4 years ago on the non-OC version, and you're not sure if you're bottlenecking
>>345421665
Nah, MT Framework is what happens when Sony doesn't hold a monopoly all around the world. Capcom had second thoughts about being PS3 exclusive, especially with the 360 kicking its shit in so bad in the beginning.
>>345422425
The downside of being a graphics whore. I love having everything turned up when playing a game. It's just how the game is supposed to look like. Too bad framerate has to suffer for it.
The most optimized game I ever played was just cause 2. Never had any dips with everything turned up.
>>345422706
You are.
>>345421534
>tfw they fucked up DMC4 SE
it's nowhere near as smooth as DMC4 for some reason
>>345419735
>those specs
You don't get to talk about >Well-optimized games senpai. Just continue upgrading.
>>345422552
Everything on very high except post FX (high).
Extended shadow distance maxed out, long shadows on, and high detail streaming on.
Granted, I also have 16 GB of RAM.
>>345422420
There's some back to the future shit going on here in this image
As someone with a i3 540 I can tell you that Sleeping Dogs and Mad Max are probably the most optimized games I've played.
>>345422420
wolverine is looking good
>>345422789
should i get a 6600K or wait until whatever comes out next month and shits all over it?
>>345421370
You are mistaken my friend.
>>345422843
Pffft, mad max barely had anything going for it.
Is there still nothing but hackers?
>>345422907
Well, it was a WB game on PC, so it had that working against it.
>>345422895
Did you post the wrong image?
>>345422826
I got 16 too. I'm starting to think it's the HDD bottlenecking it. Damn, I really didn't want to turn paranoid with write and read cycles or whatever you call the SSD equivalent.
>>345422895
Pic unrelated?
>>345421259
Nah, just had abysmally bad, low resolution textures and no real demanding technical features.
>>345422895
Wow that looks very real. Too bad it was a bit of a cluster fuck
>>345422895
guaranteedreplies.jpg
>>345422895
>a thick line separating the blurred out road and the car
>no reflections
>that PS2 mountain and foliage
???
>>345422990
Probably not, I'm running an HDD from like 2007 and it functions fine.
Game just eats up more memory the more you alt-tab out of it.
>>345422969
Lol I hadn't realized. I barely played the game. Got bored within a few hours and thought I'd finish it some other time. Unfortunately mgsv was right around the corner... I don't think I'll ever get back to it. Waste of 15 bucks.
>>345422990
Is your power plan set to High Performance?
>>345422895
Always made me giggle how so much detail was put into cars for racing games, yet the environment is always garbage. Not like it matters since cars are the only things that matter for those games.
>>345422895
>low res jpeg mountains
Real life has never looked so beautiful.
>>345423163
Mad Max and MGSV came out the same day.
>>345422949
Yes
>>345423176
I always hope for a game that has both aspects well detailed. You'd think by now they could do that given all the advancements in tech we have. Guess when you're going fayst it doesn't matter.
>>345423095
That only makes it worse. Do you update Windows? Are you on 7?
>>345423165
Does that make a difference? It's on balanced. I assumed Windows would just pump out more power to the CPU as required.
>>345422985
>>345422995
>>345423065
>>345423176
Had it not been for the filename, you would not have guessed this is a video game.
>>345423238
LOL that explains a lot then. Now I'm wondering why I bothered playing mad max first then.
>>345423393
The camera would be shaking a hell of a lot more in a real car.
>>345419735
No GTA is not well optimized tbqh
In the city sure I get 60FPS all the time with drops to 55 sometimes with a 970 and everything set to max except shadows (high, very soft) and MSAA (2x).
when i go drive to the desert part of the map or the mountains then rip framerate and best i can get is 40
>>345423328
>Do you update Windows?
I haven't updated my install of Windows 7 in nearly 3 years.
I run a fucking toasted but Metro: Last Light still looks gorgeous on it. I don't know how they did it.
>>345423393
The only realistic thing about that is the lighting inside the car.
>>345423393
Garbage driving physics tho. Just wait for Assetto Corsa to come to the PS4.
>>345423502
I get the same with drops in the desert. It's something to do with grass, I think.
>>345422223
>>345420169
>>345422223
>laptop with nvidyer 750m
>consistently over 60 fps with mixed high/medium settings
imo it looked good too
>>345423502
Turn the grass down. It fucks the fps up.
>>345423393
physics do not work like that
>>345423502
What resolution?
Also what CPU?
Your performance is worse than what I get on my 280x at 1440p, and most of my settings are on max (aside from grass, post FX, and reflections).
>>345422969
Speaking of WB, the PC port is a damn shame. NOW it looks and runs just fine, but the fact WB literally wouldn't OK any of the fixes until people were mass returning it is especially terrible. And why was the PC version given such little care? All because of "muh console DLC," of course. Even the footage they were showing at E3 (which, of course, was the PC version) stuttered every now and again, WB clearly was prioritizing DLC. It's (((just a coincidence))) that the PS4 version was marketed to hell and back, had tons of exclusive DLC, and Rocksteady is now working on a PSVR exclusive Arkham game.
Damn shame. Even the keyboard shortcuts are great, sure is nice to scroll through the wheel (or press numbers) for gadgets instead of bringing up a separate menu. I am able to get 50+FPS at the lowest with all settings maxed out, 70-80FPS on average with an i5, 970, and 16GB of RAM. There's a micro stutter here and there when the game loads up a new portion of the game, but it's a night and day difference from then and now.
>>345420169
Honestly, this is the worst part of Konami going to pachinko. The Fox engine was the smoothest shit, and easily their greatest achievement.
>>345423393
HAHAHA
keep posting em nigga, I'm dying here
>>345423648
Ayyyy looks like just cause 2 is winning.
MAD MAX is optimized like FUCK
>>345423503
Might be worth looking into. Thanks.
>>345423502
>>345423567
>>345423580
No point having grass set to high. The game was not designed around it and it really shows on desert missions.
>>345423617
Fuck, I meant to add that I was talking about Arkham Knight.
>>345423732
>that fov
>>345423732
>an empty desert is easy to render
Who'da thunk
>>345423861
GTA V
>>345423861
GTA 4
Metro 2033 Vanilla
APB Reloaded
>>345423732
I don't know why it took me so long to realize why it's so optimized
It's a fucking desert, there is nothing in it
>>345423861
GTA IV, Saints Row 2
>>345423740
>>345423502
I dunno, my performance doesn't take too much of a hit in the desert.
I'd suggest turning grass down a notch to very high instead of ultra.
>>345423008
>>345422731
Nah-samefag?
>>345423861
Arma 3
>>345423780
Hiring that motherfucker was their greatest achievement, then.
>>345423732
>forgot about this game during the steam sale
>>345423393
>>345422895
Sometimes I wish I didn't buy a PS4, I don't want to be in the same group as this retard.
>>345423861
Batman. Watchdogs. Other ubishit games.
Those are the biggest ones I can remember. The ones that made me just want to quit gaming altogether. I already barely play games. Getting hyped up for a game and then having it completely disappoint you is one if the worst feelings.
P.S fuck fallout 4
>>345424010
No.
God forbid someone uses the same common as fuck word.
>>345423861
Mirrors edge catalyst
Anything ubisoft
Dayz
>>345424018
Not with the most recent updates they have been spewing out. What's fucked is how you actually GAIN fps by turning up settings, because only then will it utilize the GPU instead of CPU.
Just Cause 2
>>345424050
you are like a little baby
>>345424104
>>345423740
no-samefag?
>>345423994
You should really turn off the unflippable setting, makes the game a lot more crazy
>>345422895
>>345423393
At least post a good looking screenshot.
But anyway, even the new Forza Horizon looks way better than Driveclub, + it has way more content.
>>345424141
Does that include the view distance? I still get shitty framerate with everything on ultra and a relatively short view distance. View distance seems to be the only thing that makes an impact either way.
>>345424018
>Confusing optimized with resource intensive
I mean you are rendering thousands on meters worth of land and enemies, of course it doesn't run well. Literally all of the load is on the processor.
>>345423950
Saints Row 2 is just broken. It suffers from horrible data streaming, which can only be somewhat alleviated by using an SSD. The base game is -fine-, but there's a few miscellaneous areas where they clearly fucked things up.
>>345424237
Why doesn't it utilize the GPU? From what I understand, it's a problem with the engine that can't be fixed.
>>345424228
>Xbone has weaker hardware
>yet it sometimes has better looking exclusives than the PS4 equivalents, ie Forza vs Driveclub, Ryse vs The Order
>>345423502
You could also try changing the DirectX in the game.
Go for DirectX 10 if you want better performance. Grass will be completely removed, except for a few bushes and there is no MSAA.
Use DirectX 10.1 if you want something a little better while still giving you good performance. With this, you can use MSAA.
With DirectX 11, you can use everything but it will seriously affect your performance if you don't have a good PC.
>>345423656
people think that they are going to be rereleasing MGS3 in the FOX Engine just because of the sheer ammount of footage there is in the trailers for that panchiko machine
No hud is always the way to go. I only wish there was rain on the windshield
>>345423861
ARK
>>345424392
People and objects use the CPU that's how it's always been. That's why when you spawn 50,000 ragdolls your CPU usage sky rockets. So when you are rendering thousands of meters worth of land, enemies, cars, planes, etc, you are using the CPU. It is not as simple as just "using the GPU".
>>345424152
>Just Cause 2 ran like polished glass
>Just Cause 3 runs like unpolished ass
>>345423861
Last time I played Half Life 2 and it's episodes, alt tabbing crashed the game
>>345424567
Don't beat yourself over it. If we had a modern-day Crysis, you'd need two 1080s to run it decently.
>>345424403
I guess it's because MS can provide a higher budget than Sony. It's also on PC.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ActriMno5FI
>>345424610
I didn't know that. Thank you for explaining.
>>345424228
Looks cartoony. Sorry friend, this is the real deal.
>>345424669
No problem familia
>>345424615
Different devs
>>345420169
Say what you want about MGSV, but man that shit was DMC-level optimized
>>345424484
>people think that they are going to be rereleasing MGS3 in the FOX Engine just because of the sheer ammount of footage there is in the trailers for that panchiko machine
I just realized something. The battle against Quiet is pretty much the same as the battle with The End in MGS3. Except Quiet was completely trivialized because you could mark her and there were screen indicators when she was aiming at you.
The End was such an interesting boss fight and it wouldn't feel the same with MGSV Fox Engine mechanics.
>>345424673
This one is almost convincing, but the road looks like shit and the tires look like they aren't making contact with it.
>>345424673
Alright, have to admit, this one specifically actually fooled me. The lower camera angle and the focus on how the wheels change speed appropriately sold it, though in retrospect it's too smooth- a camera however well attached would be jostled more, especially during that drift..
>>345424640
I wonder, since MS is now making the move to support PC more, does that mean that PC versions of games they've funded can look better than the console versions? As in, the Xbone version is the default version, while the PC/Scorpio version is the definitive one? Considering how Sony claimed that the reason for Neo's existence is purely based on graphics competition, it makes a lot more sense for them to go all out in graphical fidelity.
>>345424673
>Tires spun up
>Rain droplets don't go flying off
>Droplets on the side of the car aren't being pushed back by friction with the air
>No water splashed on the camera
One day, but not today
>>345421534
Blizzard games in general are extremely well-optimized. It's they point, they want everyone to be able to play.
>>345422895
That mountain though
>>345420035
I have no problems with BO3, 60FPS all the time
>>345425067
This only looks close because of heavy compression, the fakeness becomes very clear when you play the game.
>>345425067
The framerate is the first give away, followed by how smooth the camera is on the game. The jerkiness of someone using a controller to steer is always a dead giveaway.
>>345423861
Anyone that disagrees with Saints Row 2 never tried to play the PC version. THere's a reason everyone says "just get the console version"
>>345425067
Alright, you win. The things that give the left one away are really subtle, like the smoothness of the head motion and how perfectly straight the wheel is at rest.
>>345419735
FPS is fine and all, but holy shit do the load times make me want to smash a baby,
>>345425067
>Mfw the game actually put too many details
>>345425316
Ok now you're just posting photos.
>>345425067
The trees give it away
>>345423861
Just Cause 3 kept chugging at 20 fps on the lowest settings for me on a 750Ti. 2 ran like butter. It shouldn't have been that bad.
>>345425316
>jaggies
>>345425067
I'm not the guys you're arguing with, but this here proves why photorealism is nearly impossible to achieve. What constitutes good computer graphics is how clean and carefully laid out the world is, while reality is very crude and rough, if this makes any sense. Real shadows aren't perfect shapes, and buildings aren't completely smooth and rectangular.
>>345424228
The Forza blokes are tech wizards.
It helps that the Horizon series is capped at 30fps.
>>345425067
You know the real giveaway for this one?
The mirrors on the left are for the camera, the mirrors on the right are for the driver.
>>345423861
Batman: Arkham Knight
Game was so fucking bad they had to pull it from sales.
>>345425067
>tfw your local track isn't in vidya so you can't do comparison shots
>>345425256
>steering with a controller
nah mate, you get a wheel if you want to play sims, that said even with force feedback through a fancy motor/belt driven usb wheel controller it's not connected to a steering rack/front wheels so the wheel input will actually look smoother than watching a real car be driven
>>345419735
Pic not related? GTAV crashes and blue screens constantly and looks like ass on almost all graphical settings aren't ultra.
the king of optimization
>>345425474
>Real shadows aren't perfect shapes, and buildings aren't completely smooth and rectangular.
These things are solvable. PCSS for shadows and tessellation for buildings.
Photorealism is coming.
>>345425316
Yea, problem with Driveclub is that it looks great in low-res webms, but shit in screenshots and in person.
>>345425590
I can't contest the crashes, reports vary wildly, but you're kidding yourself if you think the game looks like ass.
>>345425605
Why is everything so blurry? Chromatic shit or some motion blur going on?
>>345423861
Dark Souls 3
>>345425605
It's not hard to make a corridor shooter run well, you know.
>>345423861
Dark Souls for sure
If it weren't for Durante we probably wouldn't have even gotten DS2/DS3 on PC, the original port was that bad.
>>345424618
Does anybody know WHY Source can't handle being alt-tabbed out of?
>>345425605
Played this maxed at 4k and 60 fps on a single 970
>>345425836
Because it's fucking ancient and probably still has hooks in it from when it was a Quake 1 mod.
>>345425661
PCSS sucks and GTA V's implementation of it sucks even more.
Pic related.
>>345420169
Gee I wonder why that is
>>345425316
I REPEAT
THIS IS NOT REAL LIFE
>>345425921
I'd beliebe it, except quake alt tabs just fine
>>345419735
Dark Souls 2 and sotfs
>>345425934
Compared to AMD's CHS.
And this is with high-res shadows enabled.
>>345425758
Yep. Struggles to maintain 60fps on beefy rigs and released with macrostutters every time you picked up a item or autosaved.
>>345425668
Nope the game still looks like ass, just because it has a few fancy lighting effects doesn't mean shit like texture quality or character models get a free pass. The water effects are pretty static too.
>>345425934
>AMD
It's an nvidia feature you fucking retard. You're getting a glitched version.
>>345422420
>you will never comfort Keanu Reeves in your arms.
>>345425817
>Durante
>the guy whose mods break games more than they fix them
Fact: Deadly Premonition works just fine without DPFix, albeit at 720p. Once you install DPfix, the game's stability disappears entirely.
>>345425836
You must not be doing it right. Are you pressing alt and then tab?
>>345426113
Sounds like a personal problem.
>>345425757
Its done on purpose. They wanted that late 70's blurry distortion.
>>345426009
>>345425934
>AMD
Found your issue retard, you are running PCSS on a fucking AMD card. Shit's glitched.
>>345426009
I forced CHS on Nvidya in Ayy Lmao Isolation, looked bretty gud, especially with the high shadow resolution and LOD I also forced
>>345423576
Filip, is that you?
>>345426073
Whats wrong with the character models?
Picking apart texture quality in a third person game is kinda pointless, the camera rarely if ever looks at the environment up close, and in GTA you spend most of your time driving or flying, and when something needs to hold up under scrutiny the textures are upped accordingly.
>>345426009
>>345425934
Wow it's almost like AMD's technology looks better running on AMD's hardware
>>345426203
PCSS isn't an Nvidia exclusive feature m8, it also works on AMD.
Here it is in The Division vs the high setting.
>>345426320
Their skin looks like rubber.
>>345426113
Well it's too bad I wasn't talking about Deadly Premonition then. Bitching isn't gonna change the fact that his DSfix saved Dark Souls' PC port.
>>345425990
The soldiers just turned on the light as you approached.
>>345426441
If Durante didn't do it, someone else would. There's a good chance that the modder would also try fixing any minor issue that stems from his mod instead of just shrugging it off and stroking his ego on Neogaf.
>>345426412
>it's obviously glitched on AMD
>B-BUT IT WERKS
>he is actually this fucking stupid
>>345426416
That's pretty subjective, I felt the faces were fine even in the 360 version.
>>345419735
believe it or not, Black Ops 3 is literally (seriously) the most optimized game on PC.
>>345426748
DMC4 says hi
>>345426748
Isn't that the game that wouldn't run without 16GB of RAM?
>>345426587
So show me a comparison of PCSS on AMD vs Nvidia.
Just Cause 2.
It still looks good and runs fine even in potato pc's
>>345426412
>No ur wrong
>shows different game
Nobody said it was an NVidia exclusive you fucking idiot, it just doesn't work well on AMD, vice versa.
>>345426805
>>345426812
nope. see any benchmark, and all hardware does way better (and, crossfire & SLi scaling is great)
>>345426873
see
>>345426824
From what I've seen, PCSS and CHS work as intended on either GPU vendor (aside from performance).
>>345426824
Here is PCSS on an Nvidia card
>>345425990
It's odd because the left side only has slight texture pop-in for the most part. Maybe it's something to do with the way lighting affects those meshes and their shadows, but it's weird because while distinctly remembering issues for Africa, it wasn't the same for Afghanistan or Camp Omega. That especially goes for the very close pop-in of flora along the ridge.
Might just be the map because it definitely has a lot more flaws than other FOX Engine areas.
>>345426953
>from what I've seen
Well you've seen wrong moron
>>345426824
Look at Michael's fucked up shadow, looking all scratched here >>345425934
Then look at his shadow here, perfectly normal >>345425661
>>345423861
Tree of Savior is about the worst optimized game ever conceived. It's an MMO where dozens of people are expected to be on screen at all times, casting skills with fancy effects and moving around doing their own thing.
Yet, if you have more than 3 people idling on screen at once, even if they're doing nothing, fps plummets below 30. Impossible to get more than 20 in towns with lots of players and shops. PvP/GvG and World Boss fights range between 5 fps and less than 1 FPS.
Let me just slide in really quick here
>>345427085
That's because Michael's shadow is layered on top of a tree's shadow, which is what I was trying to show.
The reason it looks normal there is because the shadows aren't overlapping one another.
>>345426824
Here
Just took it myself
>>345427163
Now stand in front of the tree's shadow as seen here >>345425934.
>>345427105
>>345427174
What game?
>>345426568
That's certainly not a guarantee. And 100% it wouldn't have happened as soon as it did. On top of that he has worked on the issues that did crop up for a good while, on top new features, as well as getting help from other modders to implement even more shit he himself didn't work on.
t. someone who updated his DSfix version whenever possible near DS1 release
fuck off alberto
https://a.pomf.cat/bwjbaq.png
webm unrelated.
>>345427261
>ACSHTUALLY you have to stand exactly in the same place
No, I'm not loading GTA back up, my mom said it's bed time
>>345427408
>from 0 to 3000 instantly
>stops on a dime
This is like the antithesis of Sonic.
>>345427073
Still waiting for someone to post a screenshot similar to >>345425934 that doesn't have the fucked up shadow due to the overlapping tree shadow.
>>345427556
>>345427612
You've gotten blown the fuck out before so I think you should just stop now
>>345427591
Exactly, we've been over this a million times. Unlike what modern Sonic Team and secondaries might think, Sonic was never about going fast, it was about momentum.
>>345427705
>People who say bad things about [insert technology here] are the same person
You gonna post the screenshot or keep shitposting in order to save face?
>>345427759
>Same faggot using a 290x and shitting on PCSS
Yep it's you kiddo
>>345427795
>290x
Confirmed for being retarded.
My specs are literally right on the screen anon.
Still waiting on that screenshot m8.
>>345427408
da fuq is this?
>>345419735
>TFW it runs at solid 30 on highest settings on my 7970ghzat 2160p
>>345427981
>I want the last word but I have no argument and won't even post a screenshot (since I know I'm wrong)
>I know, I'll post an image macro
Oh /v/.
>>345423861
Saints row 2 of course
Divinity 2 is also a mess
Killing floor 2 compared to the first one.
Dark Souls
Bethesda
>>345427370
Yet the roll distance is still broken, yet you can still fall through the floor if you slide down ladders, and yet you can get stuck if you get out of the pause menu too quickly. Good job, faggots.
>buh muh nippon programming is shit
When I install something called a 'fix', it should actually fix things.
>>345428025
Also
>inb4 pic related
>>345426461
You fucking wish
>>345428108
I don't know how the fuck you'd fix an inherent dependency on tying physics to framerate during development with a god damn dll-injector. Fucking From didn't manage that during DaS2 until the re-release.
Also that easily 'fixed' by not using the 60fps part of the mod that they explicitly warns is unstable due to the retarded way they handle physics in DaS1, and you're still left with a shit ton of convenience settings and unlocking the internal resolution.
Rollercoaster Tycoon, apparently. Never played it, but from what I read, because it was made completely in Assembly, the code is ultra-optimized and runs smooth as butter.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RollerCoaster_Tycoon
>The game was developed in a small village near Dunblane over the course of two years.[2] Sawyer wrote 99% of the code for RollerCoaster Tycoon in x86 assembly language, with one percent of the functions written in C for interaction with the Windows operating system and DirectX.
>>345428126
Just shut up kid. He proved you wrong.
>>345423939
>2033 Vanilla
Nigga that shit is great even if you got a piece of shit PC
>>345423861
Cryostasis
>>345421098
>What are the best settings for a 290X?
Gasoline and a fucking lighter
>>345419735
I wouldnt call it very well optimised at all. The load times are shit and dont do anything if you tab out and the framerate isnt the best once you remove all the stupid blur options they added.
It's a better port than most games, but it still has a lot of stuff that should have been fixed.
>>345428878
30FPS isn't great.
60 is good, more is better 144 is great.
Uncharted 4
>this was rendered in real time on a 2013 laptop APU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YrEDCnhoH7M
>>345429502
optimized 'better-than-most' console games means the same as 'well optimized'. Sure, there is shit to be done to make the optimization even better, but the game qualifies for the thread, to say the least.
>>345429635
I wouldn't even call 60 good. After being used to much higher framerates, 60 is bare minimum when it comes to playability for me.
>>345429502
Load times aren't bad at all.
You mean connection time is bad.
>>345429635
On medium with a 650 I've got 60+, I know it might run worse the higher you get but you can't deny that vanilla looks better than the redux.
>ctrl + F
>No Alien Isolation
I'm disappointed in you guys. Literally one of the best ports of the last 2 decades, if not the best.
>>345423861
>only 1 Cryostasis
>no daikatana
A lot of youngins in here.
>>345423861
Just Cause 3, Saints Row 2, Mercenaries 2, GTA IV.
>Arkham Knight on PS4 is like 90gbs
>>345429756
Yeah, 60 is definitely the new 30
>>345424993
Have you played forza 6 on PC? Looks way better than on Xbone.
>>345429816
I just recently got a 144hz monitor and it's amazing how quickly 60fps starts to look like shit. All these years I thought 60fps looked smooth and now it's just choppy as fuck compared to 144.
>>345419735
>pieces of scrap,cans,random rubble with 2048 textures
>optimized
>>345429929
Already posted
>>345423861
Final Fantasy XIII on PC
>looks better than gta 4
>runs a fucking hell of a lot smoother
>>345431425
Well, that comes pretty easy when there's fuck-all to do in it.
League is actually suprisingly well optimized, even the shittiest of computers can run it well.
>>345422706
There is a very easy way to check that if you'd bother to invest 5 fucking minutes into a youtube video.
>>345423861
Wolfenstein TNO
>>345422420
who would take a picture of hugh jackman eating a shitty pizza, with a knife and fork no less
>>345431868
He's not wrong. There were a shitload of people who couldn't get 60 fps on any settings and still had tremendous chugging problems.
>>345430327
>way better
oh man some fancy lighting and anti aliasing
>>345423861
newest patch for ps4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RPMbWwDFVCY
look at 1:40
>>345424104
God does forbid being a fucking cunt tho
>>345422795
It's those shitty shaders that added Motion Blur and DoF
>>345427408
sonic is gay
>>345425802
But it doesn't run well, it runs so well it's weird.
60fps max settings on a 6950, 4k 60fps on a 970 while looking amazing.
Why the fuck do AMD sponsored games run like silk on both AMD and Nvidia cards while Nvidia cards run like shit on both AMD and nvidia.
>posting ps4 games
Is this thread about optimization or about graphics, why are you posting ps4 games you can't see their frame rate or test different configurations
>>345419735
Runs like a dream even on my old 7850
>>345423861
Fallout 4
>>345419735
>gta5
>well optimized
lo
>>345423861
Final Fantasy XV
>>345437569
>mfw I find someone with the same, outdated GPU as me
>>345421534
Some branches of the Source engine are quite outdated and terribly CPU-bound. For example, CS:GO runs like shit on some mid-range PCs.
>>345420035
I have 16GB of RAM but I doubt my 280x will handle it.
>>345438047
Source relies only on the CPU anon. You'll see minimal gains going from a shit to top tier GPU, but will see tremendous gains with a .6ghz CPU overclock.
Also GO runs worse since the update that made hitboxes perfect, way too much background calculations.
>>345437493
nice SNES graphics there
dem 16x16 bitmap textures are glorious
Best optimized game I've ever played
>>345438191
I don't get why they can't just update the engine.
>>345438602
this
looks excellent while running on total toasters. Somebody even managed to run it on a fucking tablet or something
>>345424237
i love armadrones, the engine is utter shit and uses one core of your cpu, bottlenecks your gpu. these are known issues for like 6-8 years and bohemia doesnt seem to give a shit about it
>>345437992
To be fair, 7850 overclocks very well.
>>345438602
It just does everything right. Looks pretty good without having useless graphical gimmicks, doesn't use a CPU intensive ragdoll engine like GTA, uses rather low poly models with great textures
Also great lighting and reflections, too bad we'll never see a proper game with interiors except for PT and some MGSV bases
>>345438602
>Fox Engine will be used for shitty football games and pachinko until it's dead in the shitter
>>345431727
This. Holy shit it micro stuttered. Sure, I played it on 5 year old hardware. But it's not supposed to be that fucking bad.
>>345438602
FOX engine was god damned amazing. It looked amazing on my old ass graphics card and hardly ever lagged.
And a damn fucking crime. Unless Kojima recreates something close to the fox engine at his new place, the current one is gonna be used a fucking screen for Pachinko machines.
>>345424843
That's just the mechanics, not the engine.
>>345439187
I don't think so. For Death Stranding he probably uses some Sony inhouse engine, it's just weird that noone made an engine like FOX in years, everyone goes for dumb after effects and shit like hair that takes up 50% performance instead of going for optimization
One of the worst optimized games:
Squad.
It's almost like ArmA 3, except it has 80% less content, yet still succeeds to run like a piece of shit.
Don't go on lereddit and say that, or their forums, or they'll ban you. Despite having a pretty damn decent PC.
>>345438602
This image always makes me want to replay MGSV, but i don't know. Chapter 2 is just so weird and the bossfights are some of the worst in the series
>>345419735
>1440p
how is poverty treating you
>>345423861
Halo 2
>>345439187
Well it's good thing you can't patent the graphical fidelity of an engine, so there's no danger of "Your engine looks just as good, stop that!"
>>345420795
>>345419735
Not that anyone cares since these posts are super old, but don't be fooled. I know these exact spots as 'frame boost' spots. Similar to the bridge leading to fort zancudo which I nickname "60frameBridge" and the tunnel right after I call "Silk Tunnel". I have a gtx970 and it doesn't stay 60fps all the time, and I run it at 1080p medium/high settings
There are just areas like this, I hate that people like OP lie/exaggerate about this shit.
>>345439187
You know Kojima didn't create the FOX engine - he doesn't code.
>>345422420
>>345422842
>>345422860
>>345426108
>>345432316
>tfw just saw the interview with these annoying assholes rep who at first asked him to confirm that he is actually quite private person and then immediately started to uncomfortable questions
Dude just want to eat his pizza alone why in the fuck would you fucking hover in his face with your shitty camera jesus fuck
>>345422895
>that
>any good
Step up:
>>345419735
holy fuck that text is hard to read
>>345438602
>60FPS lock
>Unlocking framerate breaks physics
Do you even understand optimization?
>>345419735
D44M
Dishonored
GTA V
Witcher 3
>>345423732
Shadow of Mordor ran smooth as butter too. Same engine I think.
>>345423861
Why is deleted?
>>345440660
The fucking loading times though.
>>345438602
except being in the ACC makes my rig immediately pump out massive heat
honestly, I hopped in the chopper, went downstairs to make a butty, came back up and it was like walking into an oven
>>345419735
yeah no, kid
>>345424823
really? I thought Avalanche developed Just Cause 3
>>345441013
I managed to play it from start to 100% on my 560ti
looked awful, but it's an awful game
>>345424156
succ
This gemfuck you, it's goodwas powered by technomancy or something. It ran perfectly when I could barely run other similar games.
>>345422895
Look anon, I like my PS4, but that screenshot is shit. If you're going to post Driveclub use a video.
>>345422783
Just Cause 2 used billboarding to present trees. Keep an eye on the trees when you're flying at high speed just above the trees, especially when you turn.
>>345419735
Too bad the engine doesnt work well with large worlds. They had to cap the max speed of the vehicles to let the world load before they reach it. At the max LOD distance the game works with simple animations that switches to normal animations causing lots of glitches to happen but the worst part for me was how the police just show up and disappear.
>>345440893
This. I played on PS4 but sitting in the ACC made the thing's fans so goddamn loud.
>>345441096
>ps4 users so desperate they have to edit their screenshots in post to make their games look good
>>345438602
>runs on the fucking 360
>>345441327
But that screenshot only looks average at best.
>>345424228
>Forza looks better
>flat colors all the way
>>345441391
Better than an unedited one, which is why I made it a subject of mockery
>>345440659
I 100%ed the game with an unlocked framerazte. You are full of shit.
>>345441013
I actually thought my download speed was running slow at first. This is messed up.
>>345441327
It's not edited though, just got lucky with the angle and it doesn't look that good in motion. Here's a shittier pic I took.
>>345441737
Nah, the game doesn't have that much contrast
>>345441013
>GPU at 80C
wat
>>345425067
>real uses a fucking rolling shutter that makes everything trembles
I would stick with the game.
>>345441859
It does in some really small areas. You can see the quality drop when you get to the more open levels.
I'd have to say TOOT is the best optimized PC game I've played in ages. Such a good visual quality to performance ratio.
>>345441859
>>345442016
And the color almost disappears in some other levels.
>>345419735
Ark survival evolved, shit is so well optimized i could run it off my phone
>>345441076
>Playing an awful game to 100%
Why? Is this what neets do with their lives? Jesus Christ.
>>345442429
Why do people say IV looks better than V?
>>345442525
It was their first GTA.
>>345442525
Because desaturated colours are """REALISTIC"""
>>345442429
>>345442429
>GTA IV
>Optimized
>runs at 30 fps even on high-end hardware
>constant framerate drops
>looks like shit
>>345442525
Nobody said that, ever. It's more impressive and has more TECHNOLOGY, but from a graphics point of view, GTAV looks better.
>>345442710
>It's more impressive
Hardly.
>>345442602
Haven't played GTAIV in years, but I'm pretty sure there was ONE slider that fucked everything because it pushed the settings beyond the engine limits, and no matter your PC it won't work. Something to do with draw distance I think. Lower that one setting and it runs fine.
>>345442748
It was at the time, at least. Coming from SA, IV was pretty fuckin' impressive and was definitely the most convincing open world city by miles.
>>345442851
That is true.
>>345442804
Nigga I even tried it on the lowest settings and the frames still dropped every second
It was worse than 9/11
>>345442804
>>345442602
actually the latest patch fucked everything up.
1.0.4 looked fantastic and ran on my old gtx 460 completely maxed out. then they changed something to the shadows or some shit and now it's choppy on literally anything
>>345419735
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
No.
It stutters and lags on some fucking computers with even 980's and there's no fix whatsoever.
Here is a realistic looking GTAV screenshot.
More here:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/137735387@N03/27766047024/
>>345439640
Get a better CPU scrub.
>>345441051
They have two studios. New York (bad) Stockholm (good)
>>345442429
>Have FX 8350
>Try run GTA IV
>Hurr durr 25-40 fps on low setttings
inb4 AMD SUX
>>345443104
It does tho
>>345443212
Seriously though. Look it up. People with top tier computers have it run fine for 30 minutes, and then it lags out on them. Mine too. There is thousands of reports of this.
It gets better and worse as time goes on and there is literally nothing you can do. GTA V is fucking garbage.
>>345443308
Works on everyone else's machine.
>>345424310
what enb friend
>>345442896
what's your pc mang?
I only played the DLCs on PC, no idea what patch version, and it ran at 60-ish on a 5870 and i7 920 if draw distance and another thing wasn't set to max.
>>345419735
Dead space 3
>>345443375
when I literally just said it didn't.
>>345443308
>3.5+0.5
Who said vidya games can't look like real life? Step it up.
>>345442923
People say GTAV has good optimisation because it's somewhat better than all the crap we got in the last few years. For a last gen game, it should run way better than that. Same goes for MGSV, it runs well, but should run 10 times better.
>>345443308
Shouldn't have fallen for the 970 meme senpai.
>>345443483
Consoles running on outdated hardware.
>>345443537
I didn't say 970.
I said top tier.
And besides, these cards cost hundreds of pounds. You should expect them to fucking work.
>>345443193
It's decent for the price. Pretty much maxes out GTA V, Witcher etc.
>>345443427
That's true. I get like 150fps in that game on my piece of shit PC and it looks pretty nice too.
I still think the first guild wars ran on black magic
>>345443623
So you're running a 980ti crossfire paired with an i7 but still not capable of running GTA V?
You're doing something seriously wrong.
>>345443718
I didn't say I had that. I said other people did. Then I said to look it up.
>>345443483
what enb friend
>>345440660
>D44M
Doom 4 was pretty badly optimized on nvidia cards thanks to a fuck up on both sides end but recently both nvidia and ID pushed patches out to resolve it and I gained like 15 fps.
>>345423393
As soon as they turned the corner and I saw the mountain, yeah, I knew.
>>345443775
>other people
Probably 12 year olds who turn on 4K multisampling and then complain it runs like shit because they don't know how computers work.
>>345442748
>2008
>Realistic vehicle damage
>Realistic bullet impact and ragdolling
>Along with everything else
For a 2008 game, it was good.
>>345439364
Amd cuck spotted
>>345423393
>you would have not guessed this was a video game
yeah, keep em coming mate
>>345424124
>Dayz
that's a server issue though.
>>345423393
Looks good until you see the flat, low res mountain.
>>345443878
No. They weren't.
I think you're misinterpreting what I mean by stuttering.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tMwIvD4iHhc
It's not a fucking matter of how well you run the game. It just happens.
>>345439415
nice meme
>>345421098
a fire extinguisher
>>345443483
You can tell that's a video game though
I wonder what is it in our mind that makes us distinguish real life from things that try to imitate real life, no matter how realistic it looks
>>345425316
how can one game look so shit at screenshots and so good at vids?
>>345443981
>970
There you go. This is a 970 vram issue.
I never had this happen on my Sapphire 290.
>>345442981
if you think that's realistc you're fucking blind
>>345444129
100% certain it happens on any card.
Including mine. A 750ti, with 8GB ram and an AMD FX6300.
On lowest settings.
>>345443981
I never had this shit.
GTX980, corei7-4790, 8Gb ram. But Some things aren't on ultra because i'm not retarded, my Gpu is between 60/70% of utilization all the time.
>>345444229
THEN WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON
I HAVE LOOKED INTO THIS SO MUCH. THERE IS NOTHING DOING IT
>>345444176
Nah, it only happens on the 970 and shitty CPU's, like the 6300 you're rocking. No wonder you get framedrops and stuttering.
>>345444343
What Os do you use ? I'm on W10.And i don't give a fuck about what do you thinks about, nerds
>>345444412
I might just throw this piece of shit in the trash and cash out on a new one 2bh.
>>345444425
same
>>345444485
Yeah it's probably the combo 970 + Amd filth then dude
>>345444535
Yeah it could be. Thanks for the help. Last time I fucking buy AMD.
>>345420169
RIP Fox engine.
>>345443981
>>345444343
GTA V has always had a memory leak that affects random users, how much RAM do you have?
>>345444783
8GB
Honestly that's pretty dogshit considering it's a game with a 250,000,000 dollar budget.
>>345444632
Runs great on an 8350 though.
>>345444863
Rockstar has never been good with PC ports.
Reminder that the reason RDR didn't come to PC is because the code was a gigantic clusterfuck and we would have gotten a Dead Rising 3-tier port.
>>345444638
RIP Fox engine
>>345444638
>>345444936
It will be missed.
>>345444936
>we never got to see a full Fox engine game not hindered by last-gen platforms
>>345444926
>Rockstar has never been good with PC ports.
>What is Max Payne 3
I could max this game out on an 8800GT.
>>345444998
Why do games do this shit.
>>345445034
Because it was nothing but small corridor maps.
People only say GTA V was a good port because it wasn't as horrible as GTA IV's, but it was still a mediocre one.
>>345443483
what game?
>>345445089
Muh ''cinematic'' gimmicks.
>>345443483
My problem with ENBs is that they always either look great in screenshots and shit in motion or great in motion but awful if you look at the same location for longer than 2 seconds.
>>345438180
I have that same card and it runs just fine.
>>345445260
The one I use in these pics looks great both in motion and in pics.
Then again, it's a combination of ENB, SweetFX and Reshade.
>>345445126
GTA V. Probably with an ENB
>>345445205
That was by far the ugliest mission in the game.
>>345445089
It's supposed to simulate your eyes, which is stupid though, same with depth of field
Your eyes either do it themself or they don't, focusing doesn't work like that
>>345443483
Why is it that Rockstar can't make graffiti look even a little bit realistic or believable?
What's with those literally perfect marker tags on fucking brick, it's such a small stupid detail no one cares about but to me it looks so fucking out if place.
>>345425757
It's the one game where it works, it looks really similar to the alien movie
>>345445363
aka dick chokem its time to chew frames
>>345445490
Try not playing in a toaster.
Can other developers not use FOX engine? Like Unreal, Frostbite, Unity etc.? Or does Konami not allow it
>>345445620
For that, they must license it, and Konami is apparently not doing it.
Which is absolutely retarded since it's free money.
>>345445620
Konami could license it, but then the game devs wouldn't have any control over the engine if they wanted to modify it to better suit their game.
That's why Bethesda uses their modified Gamebryo horseshit despite the fact it's horseshit. They have full control over it.
>>345420035
I am with you anon. I've never had any issues with this game.
i7 4.00Ghz
16GB Ram
970
Installed on my backup regular 2TB HD (my SSD is only 120GB)
>>345429635
>1440p 165Hz IPS w/ Gsync + GTX 1080
No one could prepare me for this
>thread about well optimized games
>no one has said Trackmania
>>345419735
not that one
that one runs like shit mainy due their shitty ingame drm
>>345445767
you can still license your open source shit like UE4. But that would require some forethought by konami...
>>345444149
I think you're the one that needs to get his eyes checked out.
>>345445089
I don't know about photography, but in videos, HDR works the same as it does in video games.
Makes the brights brighter, without removing detail in the shadows
>>345443483
Tfw last patch fucked my modded game
>>345438602
The game doesn't actually look like that anymore.
Throw on some lower draw distance, piss filter, low quality shadows and no cool filters and you're done.
>>345419735
>0 FPS
>>345445424
You do know your eyes cannot do dof on a flat screen, right? If you want it, it has to be added by the game. Same thing with HDR - a screen is nowhere near the contrast ratio your eyes can see.
>>345425605
I played this maxed at 1440p and 60 fps on a single 280x. With ReShade.
>>345434982
>Why the fuck do AMD sponsored games run like silk on both AMD and Nvidia cards while Nvidia cards run like shit on both AMD and nvidia.
because AMD are moderate jews, while nvidia are full blown kikes.
>2011 game
>still looks better than most games today and you don't need a powerful pc to run it
>>345425605
60 fps all day everyday on a HD7770
>>345421259
thats more about having a great artstyle with lower texture quality and less polygons in general akin to windwaker. Still looks fucking great tho
on a 250x i'm surprised i could even run this game
>>345427591
>>345427720
Its just a fucking demo you autistic fucks
>>345445535
MGSV is so empty to be honest
There are only a few structures, basically no interns, it way to much opened.
Even MGS3 had a good balance between open spaces and close ones.
>>345419735
Not hard to optimized a game with empty open world and nothing to do.
>>345447060
Yeah, which makes the menus and such standout because the menu controls are absolutely retarded.
>>345447325
Yeah, it took me a good minute to get used to them.
>>345434982
Watch this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZcF36_qMd8M
>>345447060
It ran at 30fps 720p on a 2nd gen A4 alone.
>>345426461
TECHNOLOGY
>>345447651
If Forza looks like that, great, but that pic looks like promotional crap.
>>345420850
What?
Fox Engine was made by Kojima Productions, it's being used in Death Stranding
>>345447556
omg i hate nvidia now
>>345448020
It's owned by Konami.
>>345446398
Nah, with the sky that clear the colours should be much brighter and more vibrant. That kind of lighting would happen if it were overcast.
>>345443442
Et Tu
>>345448241
But it's supposed to be like LA. The skies should never be that clear.
>>345438602
>>345446542
>>345441337
>>345440893
>>345440659
>>345439367
>>345439187
>>345439008
>>345438689
LOL MGSV looks like a fucking PS3 game because IT IS
No wonder it runs on your toasters when it looks barely better than Red Dead Redemption
>>345437569
got 35-40 fps high setting on 750 ti
>>345448020
You wish
>>345419735
it was well optimized before but now it sucks ass, especially in GTA Online, could easily play on everything Ultra except Shadows in 1080p and 4x MSAA with 60FPS or so but now i have everything on very high/high same resolution but MSAA at 2x with FXAA turned off and i get like 40 fps on a good day, mostly 30 or even less in some GTA Online situations.
Fuck you Rockstar, you're so shit you ruined your own game.
>>345444129
>>345443981
I have a 970 and this has never happened when I've played. It's not even a 970 issue.
This thread has made me realize just how few of you fuckers on here actually understand what "well optimized" even fucking means.
Just because the game can't run on ultra settings on 4k from your Intel HD3000, doesn't mean it's not "well optimized" fucking retards.
>>345447819
It actually does look like that which is pretty impressive considering it's 60FPS and 1080p on Xbox.
>>345445089
>>345446514
HDR in photography is about capturing a higher dynamic range(difference between darkest and lightest) in one image. HDR in games, from what I can tell, is about rendering the game with a large difference between dark and light, then essentially showing a smaller range of that light level at time. They do tend to have the opposite results to each other, though.
>>345448656
Is AC Unity well optimized?
Give me an example of a game that runs like shit, but is well optimized
>>345448638
yeah that's definitely what I said. I feel people over exaggerate the 970 meme.
PS4 Yakuza games are pretty well-optimized. Not sure how well 6 will be though.
>>345444638
This looks nice until you realize how static it all is. Crysis did jungles much better 8 years prior.
>>345448830
Because Crysis was a PC game, MGSV is an open world PS3 game.
>>345448801
>a game that runs like shit, but is well optimized
Do you even read what the fuck you're typing before you press submit?
>>345448896
Far Cry 2 also did jungles much better, 7 years prior and was an open world PS3 game.
>>345448959
Then what are you trying to say?
Games that need 2 1080 to run at 60fps can still be optimized well?
Give me some examples of well optimized games
>>345449069
>>345448830
Thing is, MGSV didn't try to make jungles, it went for the Savanah look..
>>345422895
>mountains look like 240p stretched jpg files
>>345449069
Far Cry 2 is an overrated turd with an even more boring map than MGSV.
It doesn't even have any landmarks, just corridors, rivers, and a little town in the middle of the two clonic maps.
>>345449156
Far Cry 2 also did savannah's better.
>>345449280
>>345449156
Yes /v/, the game that no one remembers is better than the popular one.
>>345449234
Don't get me wrong, the game is shit. But this is about technology and optimization, in which Far Cry 2 is superior.
>>345449359
In what is Far Cry 2 better than MGSV regarding tech and optimization?
The world is just as static as MGSV, only thing remarkable about Far Cry 2 was burning things.
>>345449343
It's about how it looks
also
MGSV was shit
>>345419823
it never goes below 30fps on my 550 ti and i have the graphics medium - high
>>345423425
you used to have good taste probably
>>345449523
And Far Cry 2 looks like the pinnacle of brown and gray shooters that i've grown to hate during the last gen.
Not to mention that Far Cry 2 is more the same shit, but by being a mediocre shooter.
>>345449523
>motion blur everywhere
Nice way to ruin the shot.
>>345423393
even if the graphics were good and the resolutions of that mountain sprite wasn't 320x240 you could still be able to tell because of those atrocious fucking physics, cars don't turn like that
I'm not going to read the whole bread
AYYYLMAO still best
>toaster friendly
>looks better than real life tv8
>>345424018
arma 3 runs quite well when the server isn't bogged down with bad scripts
>>345424673
Noice
>>345449425
Well here are some examples.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L9d7ccFUt7I
Burning things is part of it, but foliage bends with explosions, branches and leaves can break off, the environments as a whole are a lot more dynamic.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KcDWD-2rACQ
Here's another video going into detail. MGSV would be about on par with Far Cry 3 in this regard.
How can PC even compete?
>>345449672
>>345449343
>>345449234
>mgsv babies get told that their precious fox engine really isn't impressive
>immediately shift gears to something not relevant to the conversation
>>345424673
>muh overcast
i thought GTA V showed that non-overcast weather can also look graphically impressive, but i guess sony drones don't understand that
>>345450117
Actually, as I'm rewatching that video, MGSV isn't even on Far Cry 3's level.
>>345450271
>mgsv babies get told that their precious mgsv really isn't impressive
Fixed.
Engines can't be judged based on one game, it'll always depend on the developer.
Crysis 3 and Sniper Ghost Warrior 2 use the same engine, so do Arkham Knight and Gears of War 1.
>>345450117
>>345449672
>people fighting over which turd looks less horrible
>>345426412
Shet you're retarded or what?
>>345448594
Well, if you think Red Dead Redemption looks bad, you'd have to be some kind of a simpleton. You're not one of them retards are you?
>>345450117
>all this tech wasted on such shitty videogames
It's a shame.
>>345425067
>highly compressed video on the right (look at the trees lmao)
>game uses stupid ass fog to hide shit in the distance
>le paint bucket grey sky instead of an actual skybox
>cherrypicked weather condition to not have a lot of things to make shadows and reflect
1/10 Sonygger try again, i played that shit on my PS4 and Uncharted and they're both basically completely awful games to the point i'd say advertising any sort of graphical fidelity or even quality or effort would and should be constituted as false advertising
>>345422795
>>345434592
It's because the console versions of DMC4SE are a good port of the PC version with extra characters added in, and the PC version if DMC4SE is a bad port of the console version.
It's fucking stupid.
>>345450271
It's impressive, but not when it comes to high end graphics.
The most impressive thing about it is it's scalability, It's hard to say how much the engine can actually do since we never saw a full game on current gen and PC only
>>345420169
ran ok on my 560Ti
i won't scatter your sorrow to the heartless sea, fox engine
>>345425067
Is that supposed to be hard to figure out?
On the left all the trees look the same
On the right you have rolling shutter effect and all you have to do is look the drivers arms
>>345424489
>those jaggies
nigger what is wrong with you?
>>345441013
>80°C Gpu
>>345451149
Nothing wrong with a toasty 80.
>>345441092
This should be said for every Serious Sam game desu.
>>345439640
I have a 770 and get 60 with rare dips to 55 at 1080 all high except grass.
![bdL0e3i[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/1aLgzY5.png "bdL0e3i[1]")
![wipeout1920_2.jpg[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/fSDoTL8.jpg "wipeout1920 2 [1]")
![4567826630_5176cd0992[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/aHmaOUH.jpg "4567826630 5176cd0992[1]")
![p-t-hallway[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/oHsz7sj.jpg "p-t-hallway[1]")
