>DK64 gets put on the Virtual Console despite having a built-in game that's 100% owned by Microsoft
So does this game have a chance at getting put on the VC even with Banjo and Conker in it?
>>345410140
no,but the DS version does
>>345410140
>built-in game owned by microsoft
which one?
>>345414009
Jet-pac
>>345414009
Jetpac
>>345410140
Microsoft can't be fucked to make their own N64 emulator for one game, they don't give a shit about Jetpac, and they're getting paid, so they don't care.
Banjo and especially Conker, on the other hand, could end up confusing. Honestly, I doubt the game would get rereleased in any form with Conker in it.
>>345414386
I still wish they used some original character for Bad Fur Day, I liked DKR-era Conker more.
>>345414386
>can't be fucked to make an n64 emulator for one game
Explain banjo kazooie and tooie on xbox live then
>>345414386
>Microsoft can't be fucked to make their own N64 emulator for one game
Didn't they have to do that when putting Bad Fur Day, GFG, and Blast Corps in Rare Replay?
>>345416123
>>345416274
Oh, yeah, fair enough. Like the xbone itself, I completely forgot about that.
Then it's probably more a rights issue. Nintendo ain't letting Donkey Kong on anything but a Nintendo console.
>>345410371
Yeah this unless they took the time to modify the N64 version which won't happen. The DS version replaced multiple Rare owned characters like Banjo and I think Conker was removed.
>>345416123
These were ports.
>>345416763
I don't think you realize what OP is asking
The question is will Diddy Kong Racing ever be made available on Nintendo's digital services, despite having two Microsoft characters in it
>>345410140
Misread OP as saying DKR had been put on the store. Fuck you OP.
>>345410140
If they put it on the VC, it'll probably be the DS version.
I still enjoyed that one. The new cup was nice.
Pipsy is my bitchEee eee!
