This is boxart for No Man's Sky™

kk

Who cares

> laying back on the couch late at night playing NMS, taking off in the spaceship at your own leisure just admiring the game

I'm ready

>>345207728
>play it for an hour, realize which aspects of the planet are procedurally generated
>this instantly kills the "relaxing magic"
>you realize how fake and cheap the game is

cant wait for the thousands of 0/10 user reviews saying this

>>345207814
BUT ANON IT WOULD TAKE YOU AN ETERNITY TO EXPLORE 17 QUINTILION LANDMASSES THAT ARE DEVOID OF ANY LIFE AND ARE JUST RANDOMLY GENERATED PIECES OF SHIT

File: Alright.png (59KB, 240x240px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

59KB, 240x240px

>>345207590

I DONT AGREE WITH YOU HAVING FUN: The Thread

There is no content, so why make a thread?

>STOP LIKING WHAT I DONT LIKE

>>345207814
This is why you dont buy into hype, especially for indie tier garbage.

I hate to break it to all the people holding their breath, but there is no "next big thing". Holding out hope that one of these small companies are going to save gaming is like hoping that one of the niggers working at Wal-Mart has a hs diploma

I'm so tired of procedurally generated shit.
It's not creative, intuitive or interesting at all.
Instead it makes it feel empty and repetitive.

Anyway, maybe if the gameplay is REALLY good, I might give it a go.

>>345208348
Save your money, because it won't be. the whole game's marketing hinges on "81 gorillion planets" because the average gaymer doesnt realize how awful and fake procedural generation is.

The gameplay will be similarly repetitive and there will be basically nothing to do because no multiplayer

I honestly wouldn't be surprised at all if the game isn't multiplayer at all. Like, it isn't even enabled/coded, the devs just say it is and say its so unlikely that you ever encounter another player it just hasn't happened yet :^)