https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eKGqtZc-xsQ&feature=youtu.be
Holy shit hardcore looks great. Bf1 thread.
>>345086725
holy fuck those graphics muh
>>345086725
Irrelevant if the games shit, schlomo.
>>345086725
>rush is replaced with line charges mode.
This is the setup being used. Too rich for my blood. I need to sell a kidney just to play this game with that experience.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2fa6PAo5FHc
>>345086725
>PerfOverlay.Draw Ui false
>Hardcore mode
>>345086725
Holy shit those cartoon graphics
>>345086725
Now if that would be an actual "hardcore" game mode where the HUD is off for everybody it would be neat.
This is just gimping yourself.
Daily reminder that the main fighting forces of the war, France and Russia arn't in the game. The American forces play a larger role in the game than they actually did. The devs are Swedish cucks.
>>345087114
>dat PC
muh
>>345087440
Don't really care since different sides have never affected anything regarding gameplay in Battlefield since Bad Company 2.
>>345087440
no one cares
also OP is a EA shill if you faggots haven't noticed yet
>>345086725
How do you even play this, you can't see who's on your side.
>>345086725
>shilling jackfrags videos on /v/
>shilling for one of the biggest shills on youtube
>doing it for free
All these fucking automatic and semi automatic weapons are triggering me.
>>345087707
>implying I did it for free
>>345087307
Wait, it isn't? Do you only activate "hardcore" for yourself?
>>345086725
Yeah the games always look nice, but they play like shit, the shooting and netcode just never feels right.
>>345087890
There's hardcore mode in Battlefield where health is lower.
The guy just got rid of the HUD in the options menu and called it ''REAL LIFE HARDCORE MODE'' as clickbait.
>>345087890
The shill used some kind of cinematic tools to disable HUD, read the video description.
>>345087643
You'll actually have to look closely and keep track of your friends instead of just popping rounds at every red shape
>>345086725
>muh realism
>muh historical accuracy
According to who? The white men that decided to write this particular part of history? Dice was brave to finally stand up and put an end to this whitewashing of history.
>>345086725
I'm glad there's no retarded Zack Snyder blue filter.
>>345086725
>epin cinematic melee kills
Stopped watching there.
>>345086725
This game needs soldier customization. It's kind of a deal breaker for me. I don't want to play as a black man in the German Army.
>>345087890
Why would anyone else want it? Americans and children who buy these games don't want a "hardcore" mode.
>>345087440
>unironically wanting to play as surrender frogs and commies
Kys nigger
>>345087995
I agree tbqh.
>Battlefield 3: WW1 skin pack
>>345087995
Lol.
They've removed the main fighting forces.
They've made automatic weapons the default.
America plays a large role.
It's just pure revisionism at this point.
>>345086725
>view in 4k meme
dropped
>>345088043
It's like having a Vietnam game with no Vietnamese.
>>345088130
Or maybe they know nobody gives a shit about WWI and just wanted an old setting.
>>345086725
this is a WWII game
current-dice is shit, as per usual
Would be cooler if the dust from the zeppelin crash was bigger and took a realistic amount of time to clear.
>>345088208
Good, a WWII Battlefield is what I've been asking for years.
>>345088195
Kill yourself.
>>345088253
It's true.
Literally only /v/ cares about historical accuracy, and we all know it's because of the niggers.
Nobody outside of this place cares about any of that, and just want a non-futuristic shooter.
Fun fact: in real life, you can take down a zeppelin with a handgun.
Also there's no automatic cannon like shown in the video. They dropped artillery shells.
Zeppelins were fucking useless on the battlefield.
>>345088328
>Also there's no automatic cannon like shown in the video
Yes, there was.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QF_1-pounder_pom-pom
>>345088293
>only /v/ cares about historical accuracy
I think /his/ might disagree there.
Also it's funny you should mention the niggers because France had the most in their army in the war. But guess what they're not fucking there. Only America and France had niggers on the western front.
>>345088185
Most battles in WW1 were fought between Americans and Nazis though. Nobody in their right minds gives a shit about frog losers.
Is it actually possible to play without HUD normally? Looks pretty cool.
>>345088293
yes shill we're only whining about this game because it has niggers in it, not because its BF3 with a WW1 skin
fuck off
>>345088489
You can play all modern BF games without HUD with a command in the console.
You'll have a hard time identifying enemies though.
>>345088510
>not because its BF3 with a WW1 skin
Weird coming from the board that unironically claims Infinite Warfare is unique.
>>345087440
In 1918 the Russians were out of the war. Agree on France though
>>345088328
No you couldn't. Zeppelins were hard as shit if not impossible to shoot down until the British started using incendiary bullets and proper AA guns
>>345088430
Where does it say that they were mounted on Zeppelins? Go ahead, I'll wait.
>>345088510
>go back 7 months ago
>everyone saying Battlefield 4 was one of the best modern shooters
>suddenly everyone hates BF after /pol/ has been triggered about it since it was first shown
Of course it is because of the niggers.
>>345088328
You are so wrong in everything you just said. Kys
>>345086725
>First thing in the video
>move it let's go
>doesn't get mowed down
>blimps in the sky
>tanks going at 20mph
>no mud
>barely any recoil from the artillery cannon
truly a historical experience, just like real life
>>345086725
>Saw the trailer when it was first released
>Oh fuck this looks amazing finally a WW1 AAA game
>Now see all these gameplay videos
>Automatic/Semi-automatic weapons everywhere
>No trench warfare
>The Bi-Planes are a huge letdown
>You only need one person for a tank
Welp back to RO2, fuck this garbage.
I JUST WANTED MORE BOLT ACTIONS. ARE CONSOLE SHITTERS HORRIBLE WITH BOLT ACTIONS OR SOMETHING?
>>345088678
>truly a historical experience, just like real life
Why would it be?
Not a single shooter ever made has been historically accurate.
>>345088576
>board that unironically claims Infinite Warfare is unique.
Weird coming from a retard who thinks he can judge a "board" based on that
>>345086725
They should made a WW2 bf desu
>>345088767
What would the difference be?
BF4 with WW1 weapons
nice
>>345088678
Here is the deal with the blimps
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barrage_balloon
They were there to fuck up enemy planes. Zeppelins though should be flying way higher and not over a front line battle.
>>345087440
>>345088790
this
doesn't matter because the game feel like WW2 anyway
>>345088586
In the early parts of the war, Russia was the eastern front.
Also pic related for the Zeppelins.
It's a WWII game masked as a WWI game to give it a ''unique'' feel.
It's obvious the development of the game began as a WWII game.
Then again, I don't mind.
I'm fucking tired of jetpacks and walrunning, which are the only gimmicks the entire industry can think of in futuristic settings.
>>345086725
I wish they would rebalance the class gadgets around more.
Add one more class and spread around the gadgets better. The medic having healing, defib, and repair tool is fucking dumb and so is giving the run around with automatic SMGs assault all the anti-tank stuff
>>345088293
Nuh man, I know a bunch of BF fans hat are disappointed in all the automatic weapons. Alot of us were expecting more bolt action and semi-fire guns. It's not just the hardcore faggots who are hatin
>All those automatic and semi-automatic weapons
>That accuracy
>Literally has to spend an entire clip trying to kill one guy
Back to Verdun with me
>>345088891
>defib and repair tool
I'm ww1?
>>345088036
Battlefront lets you choose the character model you play with, but that only has 2 sides.
literally looks great
>>345086725
I exited out when he insta-whipped out his fucking spade. Everyone was just running around like retards.
Why does WW1 have to get the Mountain Dew™ and Doritos™ treatment?
>>345088949
Defib is some needle but functionally it works the same as all the previous/recent BF games. Repair tool is a hammer and repairs much slower.
>>345088839
The fact that Americans are on the front line, the use of tanks, and shit like the MP18 suggests the game is set during 1918 though.
Also I didn't know that about zepps, thought they were a lot harder to shoot down. I'm reading more and I guess that was because of high altitude.
>>345088036
There is, there are about 10 different faces for soldiers.
They managed to take two of the white skins from the beta's files.
http://imgur.com/a/svdts
There's also apparently going to be camo customization like the one in Black Ops 3.
>>345086725
>hardcore
>plays like counter-strike
kek, even Red Orchestra 2 is more hardcore
>>345088921
en joy your negative mouse accel pos <l;o)-s-C
>>345089017
>Why does WW1 have to get the Mountain Dew™ and Doritos™ treatment?
WHAT?
BF and CoD, the official Mountain Dew™ and Doritos™ franchises are getting the Mountain Dew™ and Doritos™ treatment?
>>345088808
yes that was my objection to them
blimps weren't really used in bombing roles except for some german shennanigans and airships of the size seen in the video were a very rare sight
later smaller ones were used for recon
>>345089027
>set in 1918
>surrounding looks like Belgium
Also yeah the reason they were hard to shoot down was the altitude. But when they weren't high up you could take pot shots and down it.
>>345086725
This game is trying so hard to be a movie I still waiting for a narrator to show up
The unreasonably-chill announcer doesn't help either.
It doesn't look like WW1 to me, and all in all it seems like a reskinned Battlefront - once again dice can only remake only the last thing they created.
With that said, if it actually plays like BC2 atleast I'll enjoy it.
BF3 and 4 were entirely ruined by the lock-on systems and other shit.
>>345089017
Because it's a modern online shooter.
After an entire generation of this genre getting raped year after year, why are you pretending to be surprised?
>>345087440
>france can't fight a truck without massive casualties
>you want them fighting a war
Come now
>>345089147
>This game is trying so hard to be a movie
What?
I'd rather havefungameplay than historical realism
WHERE ARE THE TRENCHES
WHY ARE THERE SO MANY AUTOMATICS
WHERE ARE THE FROGS
>>345088039
Because hardcore in bf games isnt good.
>>345089195
Not sure what isn't clear about it.
>>345089202
This.
It encourages camping for snipers since they are guaranteed to have one shot kills.
>>345088486
Go jump under a train you ignorant bollockblizzard
>>345089196
too bad because you'll have neither
>>345089202
>>345089258
>implying there is any game where hardcore is good
It literally just makes sure you can't fight back, ie made for shitters
>>345089278
BF4 was entertaining since the B-team takes over and those have a better idea of how to balance the game and what the community wants than the main team.
They actually made BF4 something entertaining, and they gave some weapons and even made two maps along with the community for free.
>>345089087
Alright, let me rephrase.
Why does WW1's entrance into the mainstream video game market have to be given the Mountain Dew™ and Doritos™ treatment?
Why even bother going WW1 when you don't even include things that defined the war like trench warfare?
>>345089132
>Belgium
Hey I'm not going to defend Dice's fucking horrid design choices. Only pointing out when the game takes place.
I'm definitely going to skip this one. Historical autism is killing me.
>>345089196
shill
>>345089258
>>345089297
Yeah I will never understand people who think that they are better than players who don't play hardcore.
Just play a game that's balanced around it like insurgency, RO2, Arma, Squad etc.
>>345088510
>yes shill we're only whining about this game because it has niggers in it
Pretty sure you are, yes. Not in the sense that you in particular are just looking for excuses. I'm sure all your complaints are entirely valid and unrelated to race. But in the sense that many of the complaints you've gleefully taken over from /v/ would've probably been overlooked in a game that /v/ hadn't been dead-set on hating from the moment it was revealed for ~some reason~.
I will seriously buy CoD instead of this garbage
>>345089372
>Why does WW1's entrance into the mainstream video game market have to be given the Mountain Dew™ and Doritos™ treatment?
Because that entry was made in the Mountain Dew™ and Doritos™ franchise.
>Why even bother going WW1 when you don't even include things that defined the war like trench warfare?
Because they know the audience of this game wants to move around thebattlefield
This is a shooter with a big community composed of young kids, there's no way to make a slowly paced shooter about staying in trenches fun for them.
>>345088716
>Bolt-actions are restricted to the pseudo-sniper class
>Submachine guns and Shotguns everywhere
>Absolutely zero trenches to speak of
>Brits versus Germans, no french, turks, austrohungary or russians
>Mustard gas can be bypassed by just putting on a gasmask that everybody has
>No class entirely dedicated to throwing grenades into trenches
>No C96 on the frontlines, No PO8 Artillery Model for pilots
>>345089429
could you be any more obvious?
the game is shit
>>345089462
The fact that you are considering buying either is enough to suggest you kill yourself.
This game is full of false advertisement, and Infinite Warfare is the third futuristic turd in a milked to death franchise, and made by the developer who made MW3 and Ghosts, the two worst Call of Duty games.
>>345088486
>Americans and Nazis
American education.
>>345089520
>the game is shit
Must be great if /v/eddit says so.
>>345086725
This looks and plays like BF3 and 4.
Not really feeling the hype tbqh
>>345088921
Well it's WW1 I'm a little salty that there are even fully autos in the game, imagine if they where God guns too...
>>345089609
>Not really feeling the hype tbqh
Me neither, but by the way you type, I think Tumblr is a better place for you.
Remeber how good battlefield 4 was supposed to look? And in fact did look in the beta? And how good it looked without the shitty blue filter? Which you could get banned from online for removing?
Yeah, i aint holding my breath.
>>345089663
>And in fact did look in the beta?
Are you fucking kidding me?
The beta didn't even have high or ultra settings, it was ugly as fucking hell.
>And how good it looked without the shitty blue filter?
Are you sure you are not talking about BF3?
Because I don't remember 4 having any color filter.
>>345088043
>>345088486
Holy shit are you SERIOUS?
That's WW2 you're talking about you retard. BF1 is WW1 AND THERE WERE NO NAZIS IN WW1!
>everyone thinks this looks amazing
I'm 100% sure this is a game and it looks like it's from around 8 years ago I'd gander.
>>345089520
Why would it be any more shit than other Battlefield games?
It's not hard to see how all the negativity surrounding this game because of the black dude goes hand in hand with the general negativity. You, though, I'm sure you're not a racist. You're just a useful idiot riding the complain train.
>>345087643
hahhahahhaha never play red orchestra kiddo
>>345089527
>Infinite Warfare is the third futuristic
I like futuristic stuff
>b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-but its not arma
>>345089781
It wouldn't, it will be exactly the same.
And that's the problem.
>>345089850
Then get Titanfall 2, it's made by the devs who made the last true addictive CoD and is futuristic too.
Plus they said all map packs will be free.
>>345089738
Maybe i am. Both looked nothing like initial gameplay, and only got worse the closer they came to release.
>>345089925
Wasn't a problem before
>>345086725
>Real life mode
Does it stop 3/4s of the British forces being non-white despite colonial forces not allowed to fight on front line combat?
>>345089850
You mean you like the exact same shooter since COD4 but with jetpacks and wallrunning?
Why don't you just get Deus Ex Mankind Divided instead?
You know, an actual good game?
>>345090007
Why are you replying to the OP when this isn't your first post in this thread?
>>345090006
Yeah because modern warfare was only invented during ww2.
>>345089462
Just play BF4, anon. It's still the best one.
>>345090078
But it is.
>>345089825
Don't worry, I won't.
I discovered why it only has 1k players daily.
>>345089931
Titanfall 2 will be dead after 1 week
>>345090018
I never played a CoD game before Advanced Warfare
I'll get Deus Ex too
>>345090156
Why are you supporting that cancerous franchise?
If you hate shooters so much, buy Star Wars Battlefront too.
>>345090116
Who the fuck cares?
You think previous Battlefield games were an accurate representation of warfare in their respective time periods?
>>345086725
Where are the trenches? A trench map would be fantastic.
>both sides start relatively safe in their heavily fortified trenches
>if you want to win you gotta cross to the other side
>no man's land is just unending death and destruction
>easy to get kills and xp
It would be Metro Conquest 2.0
>>345090261
>Who the fuck cares?
I do you fucking moron and judging from the comments I'm not the only one, or was I too subtle in my bashing this piece of crap?
>>345090304
There's precisely going to be a trench map because they NEED an Operation Metro in this game.
They need a map to contain all the fucktards who just want to spam granades and get easy points by reviving '''''''''''brave'''''''''' retards who jumped into the chokepoint.
>>345090304
There will be a trench map because kiddies need their Operation Metro/Locker 3.0
>>345090249
Because I liked Advanced Warfare, that's the only game I liked and played lül
Black Ops 3 was trash and I refunded it after 3 hours. If Infinite Warfare sucks I can refund it
>>345090359
Nobody truly cares, ever since the nigger was shown in the game, /v/ already decided that the game was trash.
>>345090304
BF2's cap points map with Urban settings were very reminiscent of trench warfare.
Very slow going and a huge defensive advantage, but possibility of infiltration.
>>345090261
You mean like the time they had maps based on actual battles that had the correct armies and each army had the correct weapons and vehicles? Also had whole expansions dedicated to new war fronts? Yeah man, so so inaccurate
>>345090359
Why do you care though when you didn't before?
What changed?
WHAT COULD IT BE?
>>345090434
>Because I liked Advanced Warfare
>Black Ops 3 was trash
>lül
I'm impressed by the density of bait in so few words.
It doesn't seem to fix the overabundance of negroes
>"hardcore"
no team damage
>>345090487
You mean 15 years ago?
>>345089861
sauce?
>>345086725
>real life mode
>bloody eyes screen
They still don't get it
>>345090585
No team damage and it seems to take entire magazines to kill people.
>>345090548
Good, that will keep /pol/ away.
They already ruined /v/, no need to have them in more communities.
>>345090487
Yeah man I'm sure some rando hopping behind the wheel of an aircraft carrier and ramming it into the shore while people are jumping into fighter ons a first-come-first-serve basis only to parachute out of them at their first convenience is an accurate representation of the Pacific front.
>>345088486
>WW1
>Nazis
>>345090526
>bait
>>345087440
I thought America was coming in the final DLC?
They always come towards the end and claim victory
>>345090605
Lana Rain
>>345090650
Fuck off, Sweden.
>>345086725
I'm not saying it doesn't look fun; it does.
But it also doesn't look particularly unique in any way whatsoever. It looks like any other Battlefield but with cool uniforms and more semi-automatic rifles.
Calling it a World War 1 FPS is insulting to World War 1 though I feel. Call it World War 1 themed at best.
Are there even any bolt action rifles in the game?
>>345090591
The question stated if previous games were accurate to their time periods. does 15 years a go not count?
>>345088043
>ww1
>commies
>>345090757
Yes, but gaming has changed.
It's no longer about making good games, but about making appealing games.
You are surprised one of the most popular shooters right now is pandering to dudebros who have absolutely no idea of WWI except that it happened long ago?
>>345090651
Accuracy of time period =/= accuracy of gameplay
>>345090731
>Anime image
Into the trash your opinion goes
>>345090723
oh wow didn't expect you to answer
thanks flam
have a rare mfw
>>345090810
No, I called that BF1 would be exactly what it looks like, a BF4 re-skin. I'd be suprised if they made a proper WW1 game.
>>345090846
No problem.
As a bonus, have another weird-haired slut.
http://www.xvideos.com/profiles/mycherrycrush#_tabVideos,videos-best
>>345090819
holy shit look at this fresh off the boat nigger here
did you ride over on the Amistad from neogaf?
>>345088791
>"WW1 weapons"
Fixed.
>>345090913
Thanks anyway but she was already on my fapdar. There are certain videos I want of her that I wouldn't be able to get unless I torrent them which downloading porn isn't my niche.
>>345086725
>hardcore
>no friendly fire
sure does
>>345091073
It's just regular with all the hud turned off.
>>345091073
>friendly fire
FUCK YOU AND FUCK FRIENDLY FIRE
It's never good, NO ONE has any care in any shooter regarding friendly fire, people in fact, forget all the time friendly fire is on and just kill you because they don't give a shit.
>>345091215
I have never experienced that.
Especially not in games that kick you if you do it too much, or reflect team damage.
>>345086725
Give me one good reason this game doesnt look fun besides >muh anachronistic weapons or >muh niggers
>>345086725
>>345086725
Looks pretty but that's pretty much all I can gather from the video.
It's pretty but gameplay looks bland.
>>345088442
who gives a shit? The games look fun. If the models color triggers you that much I guess youll just have to miss out
>>345091328
Because I've played the same game 3 times now.
This is more of a reskin than anything.
>>345091445
/v/ really is dead, then I guess.
>>345091328
>the world needs another counterstrike with boring maps reskin
>>345091475
>/v/ really is dead, then I guess.
How? because not everyone will boycott the game because there are too many niggers in it? You need a fucking reality check friend.
Also battlefield has played the same since fucking bad company.
>>345091625
Because you're praising garbage games.
Nice kneejerk about the level of niggers though. Not that it isn't a spit in the face of every veteran that fought.
>>345089132
The Battle of Mount St. Quention was in 1918.
>>345089492
>Mustard gas can be bypassed by just putting on a gasmask that everybody has
I'd like to point out that by the mid to late war this was exactly what happened in reality. Gas was a horrific weapon that was actually pretty bad at killing enemy soldiers.
>>345091573
Its nothing like counterstrike, are you fucking high?
>>345091749
are you fucking dumb?
>>345091772
So thats a yes, then
>>345091682
How do you know its garbage? You havent played it. And how the fuck is that a kneejerk? Literally every complaint in this thread is either about historically inaccurate guns, or complaining about black people you disingenuous faggot.
>Not that it isn't a spit in the face of every veteran that fought.
That happened the second somebody turned a real war into a video game. Youre an imbecile.
>>345091845
>How do you know its garbage? You havent played it
Yes I have, it came out in 2011
Its a Kneejerk because I never mentioned the high melanin content. I'm not the rest of the thread.
But yes, /v/ is dead. Its been quite a long process but I think this place is just about on par with reddit now.
>>345091682
>Not that it isn't a spit in the face of every veteran that fought.
Why are you feeling offendended in behalf of others?
Is that you Anita?
>>345091772
how is it more like counter strike than any other battlefield? Its the same fucking game theyve been making since bad company
>>345091709
You can't run into a cloud of mustard gas and put the mask on INSIDE THE CLOUD.
Also having exposed skin during a mustard gas attack is a very, very bad thing.
>>345091972
>offendended
My family fought in these conflicts and I spoke to them about it and the reasons they were proud.
directly in opposition to portraying it as some multicultural shindig where every colour and creed pitched in and it was a lovely time, aww.
>>345089628
Why would you be bothered by fully autos? There were hundreds of thousands of MGs produced during the war.
>>345092078
I'm pretty sure the fact that some people are making money off their suffering is the biggest offender here.
>>345090723
does she do anal?
>>345087440
Devs are looking to make as much money as they can by focusing on countries in which the game is expected to sell the best. FTFY
>>345092135
All she does is masturbate for hours, with anal, but solo.
>>345087523
Fuck DICE that was so cool.
>>345091845
>How do you know its garbage? You havent played it
/v/ has aeons of collective experience in anticipating shit games
We've gotten exceedingly efficient at it.
>>345092006
>how is it more like counter strike than any other battlefield?
it's not, but all battlefield games are cs reskins with babby aim mechanics and more or less shitty maps
>>345088442
As far as i know /his/torians are more annoyed than anything whenever someone from /v/ goes there to get mad at Battlefield 1
>>345091845
>How do you know its garbage?
Not him but I have played it. I played BF3. I played BF4. I have played this game and every game DICE will make for a long time.
Pass on this. Don't get fooled by retarded cinematic baking to make the game look wonderful. It will still be the same bastardized version of BF that DICE offers now.
>>345090819
Haha, it's always nice to see new faces here. You know what they say "the more the merrier!"
But as a general rule of thumb, you should always lurk before posting, as lurking always you to become more acquainted with the rules, and "culture" of the board, and website in general!
I hope I have been of some help to you. Good luck on your next post!
>2000+16
How the fuck is this still possible?
>>345092012
The gas in Battlefield 1 is green, right? That's chlorine gas, which can be defeated by a gas mask with no other protection needed.
>>345091682
>Not that it isn't a spit in the face of every veteran that fought.
why?
>>345091328
Because I'm bored of Battlefield 4.
>>345086725
>real life mode
>still has regenerating health, a robot voice over and no friendly fire
>>345092589
It's a real life videogame.
>>345086725
>Real Life Mode
>everyone has automatic weapons
Fucking Dice, please die already with your shit country
>>345092689
When will /pol/ stop poluting every board with their permanent anger towards everything?
>>345092279
>/v/ has aeons of collective experience in anticipating shit games
>We've gotten exceedingly efficient at it.
Imagine a dart board with every conceivable space and the surrounding wall and part of the floor in front of it filled with darts, each dart bearing a little flag saying "it's shit".
In the same category, see also: /pol/ is always right
>>345086725
>real life mode
>Still seeing black troops
It's a lie
>>345092742
>>345092742
Did you quote the right person?
>its not realistic, its authentic
>real life mode
>is a video game, not real real life
>>345092742
When will asshurt newfag Dice shills stop POLLUTING every board with their permanent anger towards critics and whoever doesn't like their shit-tier education of history?
>>345092761
/v/ says all games will be shit, and when good ones come out, you still get neckbeards saying they are shit because they refuse to accept to be wrong.
>>345092279
I read this before getting up to do some chores and couldn't get it out of my head. I was washing dishes from last night trying to equate Counterstirke to Battlefield in my mind.
You are either a genius or an astounding retard to make that connection.
>>345086725
>disable hud
>WOW SO REAL
>>345092939
You mean irrelevant /pol/tards running away scared and shouting from niggers as they prepare to fight to improve the world, one ''cuck'' shitpost at a time.
>>345092916
hey look an image of a real german soldier from the real world war
>>345092946
that's in bad faith, /v/ has always a number of games that are untouchable and that it's excited about
>>345092742
yes let's make them drink the hemlock
>>345093015
You mean irrelevant shitposting dipshits like you running away scared and shouting from their slandering as they prepare to fight to improve the gaming industry, one "shitwit" shitpost at a time.You're such a hypocritical faggot
>>345086725
>niggers and Muslims running around the field
>Real life WW2
>>345086725
>real life mode
Is this a mode without niggers?
>>345086725
God, this looks so shit. Why the fuck they didn't just go for WW2?
>>345093137
Irrelevant?
It's your posts the ones falling into deaf ears.
Having daily threads to complain about niggers won't change anything.
>>345086725
>Still just WW2 in a WW1 skin
>Most weapons are automatic
>Female magic head voice tells you what's going on.
>>345086725
>gun has a bayonet on it
>it's apparently quicker to pull out a shovel and stab them with that instead
So what purpose does the bayonet even serve?
>>345093225
The focus groups said WW2 won't sell anon,
so they changed the number and kept developing a WW2 game anyways.
>>345093015
I dislike /pol/ as much as you but these bait/shill threads are already getting tiring. We already know what the game will be like. DICE will not improve.
The uncourageous boatload of historical inaccuracies instead of going the Red Orchestra route and making a game that tries to be true to its period only gives people something to talk about other than all the flaws BF3 and BF4 had. This game will have those same flaws, the same minority of people will like them, the threads will peter out again because the game isn't interesting enough to sustain a community, and we will see another DICE game in 3 years purporting to be the newest greatest thing ever that ends up just being a reskin of the last few games with some features tactfully removed and sold as DLC.
But that isn't really interesting to talk about microtransactions again, or shitty dlc again, or bad hitbox and ballistic simulation as well as a joke of a tickrate again.
>Real Life Mode
Youtubers need to be slaughtered.
>>345093223
>>345093225
>>345093239
>>345093273
>/pol/ is so angry they have to samefag and reply to OP again and again
None of these posts made the IP counter go up.
>>345093273
Later on in the video he uses the bayonet to do some kind of super sayan charge for 15 meters and catch up with a guy and stab him.
>>345093319
>Complaining about automatic weapons being too common in a WW1 game is a /pol/ opinion.
Okay then.
>>345093319
>pointing out that a shovel being faster than a bayonet doesn't make sense is apparently /pol/
I'm sorry, what?
>>345093237
At which point did I complain about niggers? Please quote the post where I did so.
You sound like some fucking loser who is so completely anally destroyed about /v/ criticizing his new game that in your mind you just bunch up every critic as your /pol/ strawman because that's all you can do and you fucking know it. But do keep talking to your imaginary people you sad lunatic shitbag, it's your own hole you're digging here.
>>345093076
>yes let's make them drink the hemlock
This offends me on a level that a million unoriginal edgy children spouting WE WUZ KANGZ could never reach.
>>345092979
It's not a big stretch.
I mean pretty much the modern FPS genre stems from CS but really BF has been emulating it for decades with the slogan "We'll be like CS but BIGGER and BETTER".
But really what this translates to is a watered down shooter with sometimes a fun tactical twist and combined arms.
CoD has been doing much of the same although stemming from more humble origins, but that's a given and it hasn't really gone too far from its source. And lately they've been looking at BF and saying BUT I WANT TO BE BIG TOO. Resulting in the clusterfuck that is advanced warfare.
Of course there are major differences, but I don't think the connection is a far-fetched one.
>>345093319
how the fuck someone can defend Dice shit so furiously like this?
the entire thread is littered with your crusade against all whoever dares to criticize this abortion of a game
Really made me think.
>>345093237
>>345093551
>stops responding
fucking DESTROYED
>>345086725
>shootan
>flyan
>runnin
>tankin
how is this different from any battlefield game? whats the problem? too many niggers? too many guns? When did that become a problem?
>>345094046
>how is this different from any battlefield game?
That's the problem, a game inspired in WWI shouldn't be too similar to the former games. It should be more similar to medieval warfare than to modern warfare.
>>345094046
It's a problem to some people that there's an overrepresentation of automatic weapons in a setting that had very few. It's a problem that there's an overrepresentation of black people and other minority groups in a setting that had very few.
It's like shoving white people in to a war in Japan on the count of there being a handful of white people there at the time. And also giving 90% of them weapons that 10% actually used.
>>345093551
Not even that anon but you literally complained about historical accuracy. The only complaints about history on /v/ are inaccurate weapons and niggers. Every battlefield threads is an endless stream of people complaining about niggers like >>345093781 Dont be such a disingenuous faggot.
>>345094046
The problem is that the WW1 troops were mainly armed with bolt action rifles, that's fucking it. There were only a handful of heavy machineguns per regiment.
Light machineguns were completely absent outside the rare field testing in combat conditions and submachineguns were also uncommon even at the end of the war.
Why the fuck you keep talking about niggers? What is your fucking problem? You keep going on and on about them like a broken record you brain damaged sack of shit, shut the fuck up.
>BLOODY SCREEN
>so real
>>345094267
>literally complained about historical accuracy
Why is that bad? Tell me why is it bad to expect historical accuracy of a game set in specific period of history?
Because if you are seriously disregarding historical accuracy, then why the fuck you aren't complaining about the lack of jump jets and spacecraft? Every battlefield thread is flooded with whiny hypocrites like you that have their heads stuck so far up their asses that they don't even know light exists.
>>345094284
What about the Chauchat, though?
Speaking of, is Verdun any good? Since this is looking like a shat on abortion of a game, I'm starting to think that might be the only shot I have at a decent WW1 vidya.
>>345094284
that was my first post you paranoid retard.
>Why the fuck you keep talking about niggers?
Why do you keep talking about niggers?
>>345094256
>>345093781
>>345093583
>>345093223
>>345093142
>>345092842
>>345090436
And thats not even halfway up the thread. Youre a pathetic retard
>>345094535
>he thinks all critics are one person
You're one deluded fucking faggot you know that?
I sincerely pity you, you really have to be fucked up in the head to think that these threads only consist of one or two critics. Get help.
>>345094657
Who said they were the same person? The arguments against this game consist of automatic weapons and black people. You said Im the only one bringing up retards. Im proving to you that a lot of people are bringing it up. Youre an idiot.
>>345094525
I actually bought it but haven't got around to play it due to recent resurfaced urge to play Combat Mission games.
>>345094743
bringing up black people* same thing i guess
It looks fun but I'm not gonna play a WWI niggers games.
>>345094535
I'm the guy who posted the negroid aiming a rifle. It's not the same guy, anon, calm down.
>>345094743
You quoted three people complaining about niggers, two people joking about niggers and two dipshits who complain about /v/ complaining about Dice pushing divercity into european theater of WW1.
Fucking magnificent job proving that "lot of people are bringing it up" as if it invalidates the arguments for historical accuracy. You're an idiot and dense as a fucking rock to the boot.
>Niggers are still in the game
>>345095272
Forever and ever.
>>345086725
>REAL LIFE MODE
>60 FPS
I can clearly see those frame drop
>shoveling from the front
Please tell me we didn't go full Call of Duty now and you can still counter-attack melee if it's from the front.
>all these faggots who bitch about muh France and Russia
Lmao who the fuck cares. As long as Germany and Britain are in the game then literally nothing else matters.
Considering the amount of black soldiers you see I don't see why they took out female soldiers if they were already in the game.
Wonder how well it will run on a GTX 760. I have a 970 but my brother is gonna get it and has my old 760. Medium with no AA maybe?
>>345096881
Because females did not fight in the war. Black males actually did, albeit a very low amount.
>>345097018
I've got a similar question to add on to this anon's question.
I have a 770, and run BF4 on Ultra with 60fps at all times. Do you think I'll have to set it to lower than High to reach the 60fps?
>>345097060
I know that, I should've been clearer, I meant the abnormally amount of black soldiers. Plus it seems odd to me because you can play as a female soldier in the single player.
>>345096881
>no black women with afro
Well someone get fired at DICE.
>>345097382
>No qt german soldier stabbing mudslimes in the back
>>345086725
That low res smoke in the distance is fucking disgusting.
>>345097159
I just found this video of a 760. Seems to run pretty well at medium. So you'll probably get high settings. Worst case you'll have to turn some shit you barely notice to medium.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9UYGdS-KflE
DICE is usually pretty good with performance on this engine.
>>345086725
Did they even bother studying the incredible tactical innovation of storm troopers or the nature of trench warfare?
The niggers were annoying, the misrepresentation of everything to maximize excitement might have been tolerable. But the complete ignorance of the nature of ww1 is mindblowing.
Never buying this shit.
>>345086725
That arty actually looked pretty good
Still a shit game though, literally a reskinned BF game with massive historical inaccuracies and straight up lies.
>>345087114
>Nvidia sent this to me
holy shit
could buy a fucking good car where i live with this fucking pc price.
>>345088043
>ww1 france
>surrender
>ww1 russia
>commies
top tier b8
Why shill on /v/ of all places?
>>345086725
wooow it looks shit
>>345097750
It really seems to play a lot different than BF4 when compared directly to that, though it also doesn't seem to do anything incredibly new either.
People who haven't played BF4 recently forget just how much of the game was locking onto vehicles, helicopters, spawn beacons, MAVs, etc. that won't be in this game, but sort of replaced by others.
Even though the weapons are exaggerated in BF1, it's still nice to get a break from all that newer technology. Especially after being killed by a UCAV for the hundredth time at the start of the game or having to stop what you're doing and kill a little EOD bot from some faggot on the other side of the map.
That being said, it doesn't look like it does anything incredibly new either, but I would't call it a reskin.
>>345094525
>Speaking of, is Verdun any good?
It's alright. Frontlines game mode is a lots of fun, you basically take turns in shooting pixels running over the no man's land and being the pixel being shot at.
Its on unity, presentation in utter shit, movement feels weird and clumsy. Performance depends of the update, sometime it works fine and sometimes it's unplayable.
I really admire how the devs still keep supporting the game with new content even though only a few hundred people actively play it.
It would be glorious if they can make it play smoother, feels very amateurish at the moment.
I feel like it's trying to be more like bad company 2 than like bf3 or bf4 which is great imo.
>>345086725
I really don't care about the historicaly accuracy, I just wonder why even make a WW1 game if you don't do anything with the setting.
>>345098251
Oh man, I love BC2
>>345098326
Arguably the only thing is the gas/gasmasks, and even that is half-assed. For example any gas thrown by friendly soldiers won't hurt you which means you won't need to put the mask on. Giving you a pretty big advantage over your enemy since putting the mask on forces you in to hip-fire mode.
I know friendly-fire is usually off, but not having it for gas is pretty stupid.
>>345098251
I didn't like BC2 but it was mostly because of the no prone shit. We have prone in BF1, so I'll be happy if it incorporates some of the stuff I liked about BC2. But I still think the recon class was way too overpowered. I don't see them giving snipers artillery strikes this time though.
>>345098660
Maybe hardcore mode will make the gas hurt. In BF4, you could trigger enemy claymores in hardcore mode.
>>345098660
Really? Gas is thrown by soldiers? I thought it would be called by the commander, like the missile strike in BF4.
That's pretty dumb then.
>>345090723
Thanks, m8.
>>345098858
There are different ways of using it. Some tanks can deploy gas, soldiers can throw gas grenades and I've heard there's map-wide gas attacks on certain maps/gametypes.
>>345098768
>enemy claymores
Obviously I meant friendly
This is the 3rd fucking game that is just a reskin of Battlefield 3.
DICE? More like DIE.
>>345086725
>GRENADE OUT
What the fuck
They have completely fucked up the language of this game
The next this the black dude will be
"KOBE FROM DOWNTOWN" when throwing a grenade
>>345086725
>Looks great
>running around with full autos in WW1
>>345086725
They weren't even called fuckin grenades until WW2
Mills bombs et al
Fuck this game. Fuck DICE and Fuck their shitty researching
Tank drives faster than a m1
>bolt actions restricted to the "sniper" class
>everyone else has semi automatic or fully automatic weapons 30 years before the technology was reliable enough to be used by the common soldier.
What the fuck is this shit?
>>345099246
>and Fuck their shitty researching
Top kek, I would be surprised if they did some research at all.
>>345089492
literally almost no submachine guns were used on anything but an experimental scale, or in incredibly small numbers
Heavy machine guns used extensively and the american made chauchat (?) was so unreliable it was discarded before the front lines for a bolt action.
This war was won exclusively by the lewis gun and the vickers
>>345092162
>want game to sell well and bring many shekels
>not include 1st world france
>include some turkroach/mudslime shitskin forces
enjoy your sales for 100 dinars ($20) per copy
>>345099439
>What the fuck is this shit?
It's tokenism: the game
Give nerds their WW1 game
Give CoD fags their automatic weapons
Give SJWs their minorities
Give grafix fags their grafix
>>345099439
>>bolt actions restricted to the "sniper" class
Yo, what? That's incredibly gay.
>>345099469
All that stupid shit was done on purpose, so it doesn't matter if they actually do.
>>345099568
>Give nerds their WW1 game
But they are the ones triggered by the WW1 inaccuracies, though.
>>345099686
Yeah but you can't give them exactly what they want while also appeasing those other groups. It's about trying to half-please as many groups as possible to maximize profits.
>>345093551
But it's not /v/ the ones criticizing, just irrelevant /pol/tards crying because there's niggers in the game.
>>345086725
>lens flare renders beneath the particle effects
fucking what
>>345089017
What's wrong with meleeing with a shovel?
>>345099439
>They have a RoF comparable to modern SMGs
>>345099568
>nerds
I don't think anyone wanted a WW1 game
>>345094519
Why would you expect historical accuracy from videogames?
Even more from multiplayer shooters?
Why does everyone run a million miles per hour in bf games now? There's been something really off about the animations/how characters looked since bc2. Everyone's a dark, spindly, skittering spider man I fucking hate it
Can you counter-attack melee this time? This is extremely important. Should only be a guaranteed kill if it's from the back. Worked very well for BF4 to make it not too COD-like.
Bayonets I'll accept from the front, though.
>>345099990
>why does it matter if we have jetpacks in this medieval knight game? Its just a video game why do you care about historical accuracy bro XDD
I wish all people who argued like this would be prohibited access from the internet indefinitely.
>>345100183
>why does it matter if we have jetpacks in this medieval knight game?
That could be done.
You know why?
Because it's a videogame.
>>345100132
Nope. Melee can only insta kill from behind, can't be countered. At least with the weapons in the alpha, we can't say anything about swords/clubs/knives etc.
>>345100228
And it would be retarded, and people would call it retarded. And you would have to deal with it all the same.
>>345100183
Jetpacks didn't exist in medieval times.
Everything you've seen in BF1 existed during WW1.
>>345100332
And it would be retarded, indeed, but it's a videogame, videogames often have retarded settings.
>>345099541
>literally almost no submachine guns were used on anything but an experimental scale, or in incredibly small numbers
And that's why MP-18 got banned?
>>345100265
Can you counter from the front? Sorry, having a hard time understanding what you meant. I'm alright with insta-kills from the back, but hate retards running right up to my face to knife me like COD.
>>345086725
>Millions of people sacrifice themselves to save you all
>Make their suffering a video game for entertainment
Americans are sick people.
>>345100361
>Everything you've seen in BF1 existed during WW1.
Yeah, everyone knows WW1 was nothing but black soldiers on the western front running around with submachine guns. I too was educated in America.
>>345100332
Imagine if videogames were THAT retarded.
>>345100434
Nope. No counters from any side. If you're at full health, melee attacks from the front will only do damage. If you're below a certain health point (don't remember what) it can insta kill you tho.
>>345100675
Oh okay, that's cool then
those graphics look like shit
>>345100675
Shame, countering some faggot was incredibly satisfying in BF4.
>>345100801
I know right? Textures look low res and flat as fuck.
>>345100636
SMGs existed during WW1.
Black soldiers existed during WW1, even on the western front.
>But in insignificant numbers and...
If you're gonna use this criticism you have to extend it to all Battlefield games. Every BF game has done this since BF1942.
DAILY REMINDER TO JUST PLAY VERDUN
It's a non-cucked version of this game. Pretty sure it has no niggers or pajeets in it either.
>>345100817
Yeah, I kinda liked that for that reason. some idiot runs right in your face and thinks he has you only to counter him like the bitch he is. But I'm already with the new system I guess.
>>345088716
>he wanted some history sperg game
I bet you are that faggot who can't shut up about some stupid boring history shit, you play europea universailis, and you think WW1 was inherently interested
GTFO
>>345100858
>Every BF game has done this since BF1942.
No, it hasn't. Name a single example of overrepresentation in a historical BF title that is so outlandish to compare.
>>345088486
KYS
Whole thread is full of cucks, but it's SUMMER /v/, after all.
>>345100882
>It's not about race tho
>>345089527
Ghosts was the best post MW2
>>345100519
WWI was fucked up beyond belief.
WWII ended in people being melted alive, man, woman and child, by unleashing the same reactions that occur instead of a sun on the surface of the earth, that was pretty metal.
Normandy landing was ridiculous too. Leaders send men to their slaughter, wholesale, with a plan that literally was written on a half piece of paper, akin to a C&C box select all units > click enemy base strat.
If WWIII ever rolls around and they want a draft, I'm going right into the fucking slammer, fuck that.
>>345101124
>Ghosts
>not BO3 or BO2
Kill yourself, the map design of Ghosts was boring as hell.
Looks fantastic. Can't wait to play it. Bet EA goes full jew on the DLCs though.
>>345101186
It was high tier senpai
kys
>>345101073
Swede detected :^)
>>345101027
who gives a fuck about representation in a fucking video game. fuck off. this is battlefield, aka hot garbage with glitches out the ass and shit netcode. stop your fucking whining you piece of shit.
>>345101236
As in, you have to be high to like that trash.
kys yourself
>>345101262
This, the fact that people here are so offended by niggers will cover up actual issues like the fact that it will probably be broken on release.
>>345097684
Seconded.
>>345101262
>gets this triggered when he can't actually answer up to his claims
what a fucking surprise
>German tank
>British flag
>>345086725
There's too much saturation, otherwise it looks sexy as fuck.
>>345100882
>or pajeets
But indians were in that war, and in a good number. I'm more pissed at the fact that France, Russia and Australia are being sidelined than the inclusion of blacks and indians.
>>345101027
In BF1942 the only class that got unscoped bolt-actions were the engineer. Every other class used machine guns.
>>345086725
>EA
Not now, not ever.
>>345100882
Ignore this, and ignore both Verdun and BF1.
BF1 will be a new skin for BF3, and Verdun is a fucking snoozefest.
>>345101265
Every map was an interesting setting and well made
No chokepoints
Spread out so you don't see people every 1 second
Ability to flank
It was great
Actual good maps
kill kys yourself
>>345101348
That's not me you fucking retard.
>>345101328
We're offended because it has niggers AND will be broken.
>blacks as main cast
>harlem hellfighters only fought in france during WW1
>no french
DOUBLE STANDARDS EVERYONE, DOUBLE STANDARDS
>>345101445
>Every map was an interesting setting and well made
All post natural disaster shit.
>No chokepoints
Which leads to snipers being able to camp and destroy everyone.
>Ability to flank
Like all Cowadootys.
>It was great
No it wasn't.
>Actual good maps
No they weren't
McFucking Kys yourself.
>>345101393
So 2 classes had bolt action weapons out of 5? Are you also going to conveniently ignore that it was set during WW2, you know when machine guns were actually used on a wide scale?
>>345101504
>blacks as main cast
>main cast
>in a online game
>>345087969
Hardly cinematic tools, BF4 had options in-game to remove all HUD elements.
>>345099990
They promised a WW1 game, is logical to expect a WW1 game, don't you think?
>>345101601
Hes on the cover you doof
>no french online either
LOL
>>345101538
>snipers are actually snipers and not fucking quick fuck bois
Go to burger king and get yourself a Big Kys
>>345089258
>It encourages camping for snipers since they are guaranteed to have one shot kills.
Until casual shitters who want EZ kills realize Assault Rifles only get better in harcore.
>>345101643
I wouldn't expect one of the two dudebro shooter franchises to pull off a slow war like WWI properly.
>>345101675
>Hes on the cover you doof
Yeah, a random NPC from an online shooter.
There's no ''main cast''.
Hell, COD and BF games just have a random generic soldier in their covers, they are almost never part of the game.
>>345098663
i just hope they get c4 again
>>345101393
Sounds like you're saying 1942 was more true to ww1 than BF1 will be.
There wasn't anything mindblowingly whacky in 1942 though. A thompson/sten/mp40 weren't experimental weapons in WWII. You could have a point with the Stg 44, but there were MANY more of those mass produced than probably all of the whackier guns in BF1 combined.
>nb4 secret weapons xpac
That is okay since the whole expac was advertised as having outlandish prototypes, and even then if you played the expac, they weren't that prominent.
>>345101601
Isn't supposed to be a british the protag of the campaign? I think the black on the cover was bait for SJWs.
>>345101682
Snipers should outright not be in CoD outside of the campaign.
kys
>>345101348
>muh trigger xD
You have to be 18+ to use 4chan, kiddo. stay mad about muh niggers though.
>>345101873
>kiddo
>muh niggers
>xD
Yeah, you do have to be 18+. Maybe you should fuck off.
>>345101846
Nope, he's american.
They made him a nigger to cover up the fact that they put a burgerclap in the front of a WWI cover since America is the main market of this franchise.
>>345101578
That's still a fucking massive under representation of unscoped bolt action rifles that were used during WW2. It's a massive liberty to take. Also, even if machine guns weren't as wide spread in WW1 the were still used on a massive scale, it was the first major conflict where machine guns were widely distributed.
Also in BF1942 the Lee-Enfield was the primary bolt action for the red army.
>>345101873
>triggered over the word triggered
15 year old redditor detected.
>>345101986
>Nope, he's american.
You literally don't know what you're talking about. A DICE dev confirmed the cover guy is an British colonial soldier.
>>345101995
>WW1 was the first major conflict where machine guns were widely distributed.
Fucking educate yourself if you're going to debate these things.
>>345086725
That ending noise was.... something. It sounded like it was ripped straight from Halo 3's Believe trailer, honestly.
>>345102169
Are you implying machine guns WEREN'T important during WW1?
>>345101986
He's African colonial fighting for the British you dumb cunt
>>345088790
Well for starters automatic weaponry would make a ton more sense than it does in BF1
>>345086725
>multiplayer game
>screen is cluttered with "realistic visual effects"
Can't See Shit Captain 2: The Battlefield 3 sequel
The shown destruction looks nice though. Hopefully it's not just a few spots for the trailers.
>>345086725
>all that automatic and semi automatic fire in WWI
>the model glitching when he shoots the bipod gunner
>overly saturated
>war defined by horrific, stagnating trench combat, mg's mowing down men in vast killing fields, periodical sniper fire, heavy ordnance and hand to hand combat
>lel just run an gun with your standard issue SMG but with funny clothes. Don't forget your old tanks that go sanic speed :^)
It's the exact same old shit from every battlefield game
>>345087440
France isn't in the game, what the fuck?
>>345102296
No, I'm implying the picture you posted isn't representative of the weapons we're talking about here. They weren't really carried around by individual soldiers. They were fixed weapons. Something BF1 still has but isn't part of a soldier loadout. But sure, keep being intellectually dishonest if you want to, its the only way you can carry on your argument after all.
>>345102128
>mulatto
>colonial
lel
>>345102436
They're free DLC.
>>345102559
>free
Yeah, sure
>>345101995
They weren't widely distributed though. There are instances of guys basically being sacrificed to ensure the enemy wouldn't capture MGs because they were more rare. Also cases of people destroying them before an enemy advance so they wouldn't be captured were seen as huge sacrifices.
Nobody is asking for an arma simulator, they just want a WWI game to at least be SIMILAR to WWI. BF1 is not.
Bf1942 felt like an arcadey version of wwii. Vietnam did the same. BF1 feels nothing like WWI. At all.
It blows my mind that an EA game is even contemplated to be played here, but furthermore it bothers me that people on /v/ in these threads are BEGGING for a rehash. Anytime we mention that a wwi game isn't doing anything close to wwi and is a reskin we get the same couple of responses.
>go back to pol
>go play arma
>what did you expect, its a bf game
It's a blatant cash grab rehash, and those of us who have wanted a BF1916 since the early 2000s have been agonizingly let down.
>>345101027
Kar 98 was produced 14:1 over the MP 40 and 28:1 over the STG44.
Yet only 2/5ths of the classes in BF1942 use it.
What's up with all the towelheads on the britbong side
>>345102519
And WW2 weapons were meant to be hip fired right? Same with modern weapons? Machine guns like these were never used in run n' gun scenarios, yet every battlefield game to date has been using them as such.
>>345102798
>And WW2 weapons were meant to be hip fired right?
Well they certainly weren't anywhere near as cumbersome as the prototypes in WW1 were.
>>345102716
I feel for you anon. That being said, you aren't going to like what other people are about to say to you, despite you making good points. You can't argue with teenagers
>>345102716
"BF1916" would've always been this. This is just a case of be careful what you wish for.
>>345086725
I'm actually going to side with /v/ on this. The bloody screen so real looks terrible.
>>345102716
>Implying this would've been any different if it was WW2.
>>345088839
Holy shit you are retarded. Small-arms fire does not mean handguns
BF2 literally has a shotgun that has only had 3 prototypes produced.
The AEK and AN94 have never been used in combat.
BF1942 has Russians with enfields and mp18s.
>>345103018
Do you swallow cocks so much to forget to breathe, so oxygen can reach your brain?
I think that's the sweet post of realistic graphics, not too bland, not too colorful
Hopefully this game puts a permanent end to the historical shooter trend
Fucking WW1, what were they thinking. Try to imagine a more boring setting
>>345103270
BF2 was also set slightly into the future during a fictional war.
>>345088716
RO2 is shit compared to RO1 tho lmbo.
>>345103461
>Fictional scenarios are okay in modern times
>Fictional scenarios aren't okay in past setting.
>>345086725
https://youtu.be/eKGqtZc-xsQ
Hnggggggg
>SMGs are default for the basic infantry class
>Semi-auto rifles are widely distributed
>Bolt actions are still just "Sniper Rifles"
>Those canned melee animations you're still locked into
>Fucking holographic sights
It's just Battlefield. It plays exactly like just regular old battlefield. This isn't a game, this is a mod. No, wait, it's not a mod; a mod would have the freedom to do weird and niche shit like have almost everyone use bolt actions. A mod doesn't have a bunch of shareholders looming over their heads to make their quarterly reports look good. A mod doesn't have corporate harking on about 'Mainstream Accessibility' and 'Brand Identity.' I know I sound like a fucking hipster, but for once I hoped they would do something different.
>>345086725
I love the armchair historian arguments every time a bf1 thread is made.
>wahhhh its not historically accurate I want to sit in a trench for weeks under constant artillery barrages before dying to typhus, that'll be a really fun game!!
>>345103576
>WWI was a fictional scenario
>Dice's "huge risk" to try something "new" not just being a reskin
No idea why you guys are defending EA.
>>345086725
>whissle
>nobody charges
> full retard weapons for everone
it will be fun, yes, but this shit isn´t WW1
>>345092079
Machine guns, yes. Heavy, crew operated machine guns in mounted positions. Not light SMGs.
>B-But look! There was three or four experimental SMGs at the tail-end of the war that were only issued to troops as an experiment!
That doesn't mean your rank and file Doughboy would have a fucking Sten.
>>345103694
>SMGs are default for the basic infantry class
>default infantry class
>infantry class
What infantry class? There are four classes and only one can use SMGs.
>holographic sights
Please stop being stupid. I agree with most of what you say but try to be a little smarter next time you post.
>>345102716
>expecting realism from a bf game
Nigga when was bf ever close to being "real"
You think 1942/1943 were close to what actual ww2 was like? You think japanses soldiers ran around with smgs and rocket launchers on Iwo jima?
How the fuck is this any different?
>>345102953
>no bf game is unrealistic
>yea but this one ESPECIALLY because the MG's were slightly HEAVIER
>0/10
>>345103350
I'm not the one who laboured under any delusions here.
>>345103870
Fictional scenarios set on the backdrop of WW1 you mong. See "Saving Private Ryan" or "War Horse" as examples. Christ how do you even breath?
>>345103270
But did it have black guys?
>>345103870
A reskin of what exactly?
>>345104065
Did you not read the post you responded to?
>>345103870
>Dice's "huge risk" to try something "new" not just being a reskin
Fucking THIS. They keep hyping it up as being a huge risk while keeping the gameplay the exact same. That's like saying your a coast guard rescue diver because you picked a dog up out of a knee-high kiddie pool.
>>345104002
No fucking shit sherlock. The game isn't meant to be realistic you utter imbecile, its meant to be fast paced and fun.
Have never played a bf game before? How is 42/43 any different?
>>345104271
Not him but his point is correct. BF1942 isn't much better than BF1 when it comes to realism.
>>345104181
>no bf game is unrealistic
No one said this anywhere
>yea but this one ESPECIALLY because the MG's were slightly HEAVIER
hyperbole at its best
>0/10
Were you rating your own post?
>>345104327
Why the fuck would they change the base gameplay when its what people like?
You know the point of a SERIES right?
>>345104327
>They keep hyping it up as being a huge risk
When? DICE explicitly said they think gameplay and fun is more important historical accuracy. They never claimed to make anything more than a BF game.
>>345104587
They literally said in one of the videos it was a risk and EA needed convincing with a lot of hard-worked promotional material before they were allowed to make it.
>>345104421
Meant to say realistic. Your point was ww1 weapons would have been harder to hip fire, which is probably true but doesn't actually change anything. Why does it matter?
>>345086725
>no trenches
>empty as fuck environments with no ennmies
>machine guns everywhere
You people do realize that if DICE made an actual WW1 shooter, they'd lose about 70% of their current fanbase because those guys WANT a fast-paced shooter and EA doesn't want to lose money from them.
Yeah sure, you'd get people who are genuinely interested in a WW1 experience, but they are far and few between when compared to the ADD audience.
>>345104738
What do you mean it doesn't change anything? Has it occured to you that people are willing to accept certain levels of unrealism because its a video game, and that BF1 pushes those limits too far?
>>345104383
Didn't have a black guy on the cover.
>>345104796
Verdun exists already dumbass
>>345104719
They said it was hard to convince EA because they thought WW1 was nothing but trenches in France. They never said they work taking a risk, they just said it was hard to get the game greenlit.
>>345104913
And that makes this shit more tolerable somehow ?
>>345104847
Because the MG's were heavier? Forgive me if I don't relate
>>345104847
>a videogame pushes the limits of realism too far
think about what you are saying for a moment
>>345104960
>it was hard to convince EA because they thought WW1 was nothing but trenches in France
EA has more common sense and knowledge about history then
>>345104847
Not him but
>Has it occured to you that people are willing to accept certain levels of unrealism
Everyone agrees with this
>and that BF1 pushes those limits too far
This is a subjective opinion. Has it occured to you that people can accept different levels of suspension of disbelief?
>>345104982
I'm saying if you want a trench bolt action snorefest, go play verdun
>>345086725
>real life mode
>everyone runs around with automatic weapons
>>345104327
Because modern shit is hip, cool, and relevant with the teens. They want to use the cool guns they see on liveleak and movie. Why else would you make 8 modern era BF games?
>>345104990
Since when was that the only issue people have with the game? I don't know why you're trying to simplify it when there's so many arguments already laid out in the thread.
>>345104996
Are you implying video games aren't all bound by certain levels of realism to be expected within certain genres and titles?
>>345105130
Sure, but then why the /pol/ memes anytime someone complains? It's clearly not a small issue or there wouldn't be threads about this daily, nor comments about it on every BF1 video.
If you want me to respect your opinion, respect mine.
>>345105191
>Are you implying video games aren't all bound by certain levels of realism to be expected within certain genres and titles?
They aren't until they advertised as simulators.
>dice shills only defense is that Verdun already exist
>mfw when their only defense is directing people to actually good game from this piece of shit
>>345104267
yes
the assault, support and anti tank were black
>>345105280
>It's clearly not a small issue or there wouldn't be threads about this daily
shitposting on /v/ does not represent anything
>>345105142
The gameplay in OP's video looks boring as fuck. There is no suffocating environment, no shrapnel falling everywhere, no massive gas attack, no attack or defense of trenches.
This is the same shit than BF4 except with no buildings and no verticality, and even more empty areas. I was excited when I saw the first trailer but the more I learn about it, the more shit it looks like
>>345105191
I was replying to your post specifically in relation to that
But really I don't understand. 1942/1943 didn't have a shred of realism but somehow that's only bad in ww1?
>>345105373
And the threads on the EA/DICE forums, and the comments on BF1 youtube videos? I guess they don't represent anything either?
Must be easy to defend your position when you can discredit any opposition with "BUT IT DOESN'T COUNT"
>>345105363
The funny thing is that the only winning move in Verdun is running and gunning with SMG.
>>345105363
>good game
Eh, I play and like Verdun and I wouldn't call it a good game. More like 'Interesting'
>>345105191
>Are you implying video games aren't all bound by certain levels of realism to be expected within certain genres and titles?
>Bound
No they aren't. Videogames can break as many bounds to reality as they want, otherwise they wouldn't be videogames. The problem is your expectations my friend. You expected it to be a WW1 sim, even though it never claimed to be. That's your problem.
>>345099568
>Give grafix fags their grafix
What? DICE has always been about pushing out absurdly good looking games. People dropped their jaws when BF3 came out at the time. That's the most retarded "pandering" complaint I've heard.
>>345105470
Literally noone cares about the EA/Dice forums. Not even EA/Dice.
>>345105280
>Sure, but then why the /pol/ memes anytime someone complains?
Because we have daily /pol/ threads about this.
>It's clearly not a small issue or there wouldn't be threads about this daily
See above.
>>345105470
Threads on fucking forums are always filled with bitching about stupid shit, have you even used the internet for a year?
>>345100183
Authenticity =/= Historical accuracy
>>345105536
>You expected it to be a WW1 sim, even though it never claimed to be. That's your problem.
No I didn't. I love how you people always make this black and white. "Oh you don't like how it is currently? WELL YOU MUST HAVE WANTED A HARDCORE SIMULATION WITH ACCURATE TRENCHFOOT!!"
Just fuck off, no use debating this when this is literally the only response people give.
>>345105470
The overall response to BF1's reveal has been massively positive. The people who hate it are the minority.
>>345105389
>fuck kyle we don't have enough shrapnel falling around in this game play testers are mad
>uh ok let's add random explosions everywhere and gas attacks that appear out of the blue to make a more suffocating environment. Also let's completely forgo all of the previous bf games'populsr modes and just have people attacking trenches
>great work, you get a raise
>>345104249
Saving Private Ryan didn't end with Tom Hanks getting blown up by a nuclear bomb. Your perception of the issue is retarded
I couldn't give a shit about muh automatics and bolts shit, I just want a good variety of vehicles and maps.
I want to see more of that ship they had in the original trailer.
>bf1 thread
>looks fun as fuck
>+500 posts
>/v/ whine
every time
>>345105802
>The overall response to BF1's reveal has been massively positive
Of course it was, they could make turd simulator game with BF4 graphics and people would praise it
>>345105363
>good game
>300 players
>>345086725
>I didn't get alpha and I'm still hyped about the game
Got some sour news, Jack.
>>345106081
>BF1
>0 players
blown the fuck out
>>345105863
>let's not improve or change anything despite a quite unusual setting which would allow some interesting takes on gameplay and cinematic experience
>no let's just keep the same shit than before with just a reskin
>>345105802
>you can't critique a game you like / are going to play
>>345105716
You're right, the black and white mentality is dumb. Here's a more appropriate analogy.
>DICE decided to make something gray.
>Anon expected a dark shade of gray.
>Dev made something that was a lighter shade of gray than anon expected.
>Anon gets angry it wasn't the shade of gray he wanted, even tho dev never said it was going to be that specific shade.
>>345100183
It's kinda like this.
Imagine you're playing a game like chivalry and you see this. It'd be sorta a funny joke and everyone would laugh.
Now imagine if every players had this in their load out at all times. The game itself would become farcical.
That's battlefield 1 as a World War 1 game.
>>345088043
>russians WW1
>commies
American education everyone
>>345106272
show me one thing in Battlefield 1 that's remotely comparable to a holy hand grenade
>>345106260
more like
>DICE decided to make something gray.
>Anon expected a dark shade of gray.
>Dev made something that was a lighter shade of purple
>Anon gets angry it wasn't the shade of gray he wanted, even tho dev never said it was going to be that specific shade.
>>345091709
This could be a horror game, bf1 is too colorful.
>>345106272
chivalry is pretty farcical even without that example
>>345106272
Hand grenades didn't exist in medieval times. Hand grenades did exist during WW1.
I don't see your point.
>>345106406
64 players using prototype automatic weapons
>>345106260
Yes? I've already pre-ordered the game and fully intend to play it. They're minor gripes that never put me off in the first place. That doesn't mean you can't bring it up though? Or should we just never mention things we dislike about something?
>>345106406
SMGs, shotguns, 60 km/h tanks, black people
>>345106201
there is more players in alfa
>>345106216
PLEASE explain to me how this game is exactly like bf4
>inb4 muh automatics
Can't have a bf game with just bolt actions, and the automatics present are not at all like the ones in bf4
>>345106437
You're right anon, it's obvious that colour wasn't invented until 1968.
>>345088195
This is it, pretty much.
They knew another modern Battlefield wouldn't sell, so they came up with WW1 using fringe weapons and gimmicks like the zeppelin.
I have to admit I was pretty hyped about an older setting with older weapons and the zeppelin looked amazing in the videos. Then I got into alpha and the hype just vanished. Two weeks later and it feels as boring as BF4, Hardline and Battlefront. They just never do anything different with these games. Literally CoD syndrome, reskins of reskins.
>>345106406
>fat tanks
>black people on german side everywhere
>blimps flying that low
>all these prototype weapons that were only deployed in limited amounts
>bayonets on guns that shouldnt have bayonets
>not able to play as french in multiplayer
>not able to play as russians in multiplayer
>>345106578
It's not exactly like BF4, it's worse. I've already said it here>>345105389
>This is the same shit than BF4 except with no buildings and no verticality, and even more empty areas
>the automatics present are not at all like the ones in bf4
I'll let you this level of delusion, but it doesn't change the fact that seeing everyone with automatic weapons in a WWI is fucking laughable
Guys bf1 thread
>niggers
>usa
>gtfo back to /pol/
>gtfo back to history class
>swedish devs
I mean ... i care not for historic accuracy they said themselves during reveal that it would be "alternative version of ww1" and since they are swedes i was expecting no less, i just hope the game is good.
>>345106525
game-testers don't count
>>345106517
If they're just minor gripes then I have no problem. I thought you were a /pol/ stormfag or something. I have my own problems with the game, I just hate people who sperg up about it unless it's a major problem.
>>345088130
so what?
>>345086725
>Player runs to the first soldier he sees to provide cover
>turns out he's actually the 1% of soldiers in WW1 that were actually colored
>close the video
>>345106794
It looks like a worse BF4 anon. Even if we forget all the shit about the setting, it still doesn't look even good
>>345106272
Imagine playing a medieval combat game where almost noone uses shields.
Oh wait, that's chivalry.
>>345086725
still not buying if DICE/EA are going to go full autism and force match making on us on PC like they did with battlefront effectively killing the game
>>345106949
There's a server browser in the alpha and it was confirmed to be in the full game.
UGH I'M JUST LIKE SO OFFENDED THAT BLACK PEOPLE ARE IN THIS GAME
>>345106785
How many fucking times are people going to bring automatics up? If you want and bolt action rifles and trench combat, Verdun is very cheap nowadays!
Why do people act like they expected a Battlefield game to be realistic when none of them ever have been? DICE never claimed this was going to be a simulator, so what the fuck?
Broken records everywhere
>>345086725
What the FUCK is up with this audio? Are they simulating the effects of being deaf from the loud bangs and gunfire?
>>345106901
>doesn't know its a cusomization option
Discarded
>no bullet hole/flesh wounds appear when you shoot someone
why? its the current year for fucks sake
>tfw people that have played most of the series dont get a code
>big streamers get code
>>345107241
Funny how people keep saying that but for ever promotional video for battlefield 1 and 3 soldiers are actually black. Not that it matters anyways because the game is going to mediocre trash and ultimately be buggy on launch. It's published by EA for fucks sake, do you people ever learn?
>>345106915
I disagree, i think it looks neat, too bad there isn't levolution.
>>345107157
There is a slight margin between hardcore realism and full retardation and BF1 clearly isn't there
>>345107383
http://m.imgur.com/a/svdts
>>345106901
well you can always go back to cod. i heard they doing space fights now. should be right up your alley. oh wait there were nigger soldiers holding guns there too. you might be fucked here white boy....just like your women haha
>>345107401
To each their own then
>>345107518
>he thinks because I don't enjoy EA games like battlefield I'm a CoD fanboy
HAHAAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHGAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAH
>>345107398
>No levolution
>Open and closing doors
>Zeppelin crash
It's still levolution, they just decided not to call it that anymore.
You know since we have black German soldiers and automatic weapons why don't they have women soldiers, rocket launchers, and dieselpunk power armor.
I mean it's really not that far fetched at this point and if you're going alternate WW1 at least have some fun with it.
>>345101030
>>345090654
>>345089765
>>345089538
>>345089261
Yall's retarded as fuck, fallin for this obvious bait.
>>345101027
Didn't they like originally start with a white assault guy in BF3 and then right at the last second changed him to a black guy?
>>345086725
>hp regen
>run and gun
>cinematic executions
>hits someone with a shovel it goes through the jacket and kills
am i getting to old for this
>>345086725
>Real life mode
>Running around through shots, killing with a fucking shovel, semi and fully automatic weapons everywhere
Heh
>>345105280
Legitimately shills. They have the same shitpost methods to spin the issue of their game sucking.
Let's be honest, this is a fucking EA game. The amount of people on this board still willing to even think about defending their shit should be a red flag.
But if you do fly any complaint, and there are hoards of them, you get the same responses. Every thread.
>a wwi game is SUPPOSED to be nothing like wwi!
>go play arma xDD
And my increasingly favorite
>ur just racis, go back to /pol/
As if on 4chan of all places this would actually be a legitimate defense. These are exceptionally potent as general broadcasts trying to twist criticism into "tumblr triggering" Hell there's a couple of these in the current thread. Poster doesn't respond to anyone, they just go
>lmao nerds all these nerds triggered by black people
Sometimes there isn't even an active nigger meme being talked about. It's just a way to shill. They've been doing it for years now, they're bound to get slightly good at it.
>EA
Should have been plenty to kill hype, anything else is just a hearty chuckle seeing shills try to look like they're actively defending this turd.
>>345107751
Because it does have a rocket gun, it's not dieselpunk, and they did have a female soldier.
>>345107656
oh i'm sorry, i misjudged you my bad.
>automatic weapons
>0.5 second reloads
You can call it 1, but its still Battlefield 5. I think with the absolute state the Battlefield franchise is currently in I'd honestly rather see Call of Duty tackle it.
I'm still waiting on a game that makes me upgrade my PC for 4k too.
>>345107751
They should just have gone full Wolfenstein TNO and make the war longer or some shit with crazy new techs, tanks, zeppelins and weapons.
It would have been better and more credible
>>345107995
>He thinks I play Halo
Yeah no buddy I play Quake
BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>345107751
>women soldiers, rocket launchers, and dieselpunk power armor.
They've said they wouldn't include anything that didn't exist at the time. Only stuff that was used, even if only a little.Tho I expect women soldiers with the Eastern Front DLC
>>345107880
They had that shit in the last 4 games.
>>345107995
>he posts babby's first fps while posting about Battlefield 1
You are a fucking joke.
>>345107980
>and they did have a female soldier.
"Did" being the keyword here.
>>345099220
Thomas Jefferson had a fully automatic rifle. Just because they werent predominant weapons doesnt mean they shouldnt be in the game. They just just be unlockable.
>>345106520
>black people
Opinion disregarded
Man, imagine if you people ever learned to hide your racism. How much harder would it be to see that all your silly little gripes actually have an ulterior motive? I thought we were getting to that point already but I guess not.
>>345099956
ive always wanted a ww1 game and there have been plenty of threads about it over the years
>>345108009
I'm not sure about credible but it would certainly make it more interesting than the shitshow we're getting.
>>345107980
>>345108145
>Only stuff that was used, even if only a little.
I find that very silly reasoning when literally everyone in the game is using prototype weapons. We've already entered the realm of historical fiction, why not just take just one step more and have some fucking fun with it.
>>345099220
Name another game where you would be able to use them.
Being able to use them is part of the appeal since you will never own most of these guns IRL, why not let people have fun with them in a video game?
>>345108094
Damn i mis judged you again my bad but i'm gettin better
>>345107157
its mostly they would they even bother making a ww1 game if they weren't going to be true to the setting
>>345108707
>if someone doesn't want to shill the next EA game he likes CoD...er..wait no he likes halo!...ummm no that's not it!...I KNOW!, HE PLAYS POKEMON!
You're a fucking loser.
>>345108506
I dunno, it's the mantra they've been using for the entire series. If it works for them I guess.
>>345108702
Not who I was replying to.
>>345108458
racism aside it really is dumb to have a bunch of europeanized looking black people in a "ww1" I simply like historical accuracy. I would love a game about ghengis khans campaign, or an african war, and i would be frustrated if they shoved a bunch of white people into them
>>345107157
You don't need trenches but if I'm going to play a World War 1 game I at least want to have weapons that reflect the period.
If I'm playing a medieval game I want to hit stuff with swords, if I'm playing a game in the Napoleonic era I want to painstakingly load ball and powder, if I'm playing World War 1 I want bolt actions and shit.
>>345108765
>Chivalry
>If they aren't lining up with shields in formation or bombarding castles for months then what is even the point of making it medieval?
I hate this argument, it's so fucking dumb.
>>345108993
Really even with 2142?
>>345108889
okay man no need to cry at my feet. it seems i have mis judged you again. but here you go a game you'll fit right in. and no you don't play quake because you don't know what that is.
now stop being a loser pls its embarrassing
>>345109219
You don't see people running everywhere with arquebuses in Chivalry
>>345109219
>I hate this argument, it's so fucking dumb.
Yeah, because it's your own strawman.
Will this game have at least one trench map?
