Fuck you /v/
Spore 2.0
Spore 2.0
Im sure it will be great
>>344301078
No. Fuck you kind sir.
>huge universe
>literally nothing interesting to do but buy and trade spices
>can't even build a camp let alone design vehicles, buildings, and animals
It's Spore 2.0 but is going to fail in ever more ways than Spore did.
These types of games will always fail. They have potential, but the amount of effort that goes into making the expansive universe always leaves the time put into the actual gameplay ridiculously lacking.
YOU
CAN
DO
ANYTHING
>>344301658
>"""ANYTHING"""
>The Model-T comes in any color you could want so long as you want black.
>You can do anything in No Man's Sky you could ever want so long as you want to scan animals and trade rocks.
>>344301078
Less features than minecraft.
>>344301658
no you fag, and this game was never planned to be like that, it's a game about exploration and dogfighting and trading in an infinite procedurally generated universe.
>>344301078
If this game and Sea of Thieves flops I'm killing myself.
>>344302256
That's some shit taste in games you've got there
>>344301567
>can't even build a camp let alone design vehicles, buildings, and animals
Wait for the DLCs dude. they might not have had enough time to add it with the vanilla but it's definitely coming.
>no multiplayer
Spore 2.0
>>344301078
t. bloodbornestation buyer
>>344302389
here is your (you)
I've never actually seen the developers themselves promise you could do anything too crazy, so I don't find it hard to believe that.
It was always billed as "comfy space exploration game with probably too many planets."
Spore 2.0
>>344302414
>Delayed one year if not more past original release date
>They didn't have enough time!
>>344302818
Pretty much this, it's just retards like in this thread overhyping and expecting things that was never actually promised. This game will be good for what it is.
>>344303010
t. have no idea how development or video games work
>>344302818
I always agreed. Will check it out pirated then maybe buy it for the proper price of 10 dollars
>>344301078
>A team of 15 people who made such cult classics like Joe Danger and Joe Danger 2: The Movie promise to create the greatest and best space exploration game ever which you can play forever because it has infinite randomly generated content.
What could go wrong?
>>344303567
>What could go wrong?
They delivered on pretty much everything in that sentence judging by the gameplay, so... nothing?
>>344304234
But the gameplay shown so far was dog shit.
>>344301078
NO, FUCK YOU
WAAAH I DON'T LIKE THIS GAME THAT'S NOT EVEN OUT
VEE AGREES WITH ME, THEREFORE I'M RIGHT
MEME!!!! KEK!!!! XD
kill yourselves, pronto
the game is probably going to be okay, but we have no idea right now
>>344304415
Well then that's your opinion, anon. I guess the only advice I can give you is to go wait for Star Citizen which is most DEFINITELY going to flop, if it ever comes out. They still delivered on what they said in that quote.
>>344304818
Obviously Scam Citizen is going to flop, but no mans sky probably more so.
i looked up spore and got a key from g2a after banting in these nu male sky threads
seems pretty fun, not too interested in nms though, i smell lies
>>344303239
t. shill
>>344304935
There's less money involved in NMS than in SC though
>>344304415
No it wasn't
Spore did it better
>>344301078
Can you back that up with any arguments, anon?
Ones that aren't subjective.
>>344304667
HOT HEAD!
On a side note, the game play will be ridiculously shallow with no actual space physics.
I'll buy it. I do like exploring things even if there is no advanced things to do.
>>344305132
Exactly, so they have much less money and much less people for development and at least as high expectations as SC, if not higher. That's why it's going to flop even harder.
>>344305231
Everything looked completely lifeless and artifical. Gameplay was boring even just watching it 25 min. I can't even begin to comprehend how awful it will be after a few hours.
>>344305340
so you're asking for objectivity from something that can only be viewed subjectively?
not sure you have a grasp on the finer points of aguing
>>344305432
>It's another autist who think all space games should be scientifically accurate
>>344305595
Then explain to me how it's going to be great and a good game. I'll wait.
>>344305583
Looked fine to me, have you watched the somewhat recents one, with the cold planet and the attack on the building?
>>344305605
red herring seasoned with a dash of non sequiter
>>344305726
first you must affirm if an opinion is objective
>>344305605
>implying it's not infinitely more fun playing with real space physics
>>344306317
What a shitty shill that can't even say how the game is going to be good
>>344306501
>Implying 99% of people care and won't be satisfied with just "you ship compensates it :,)"
>People always say they devs have overhyped the game and claimed you can do anything
>The devs have actually done everything they can to keep people's expectations in check
It's a comfy space exploration game, nothing more and nothing less
>>344305802
nope, link?
>>344306546
ad nom et ad naus
>>344306698
You mean the starbuck chillin hipster types.
Yeah because it's a real game which girls are gonna love
>>344301078
Ok, Sean. Be happy.
I'm just going to wait quietly for the ass-pain.
>>344306754
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D-uMFHoF8VA
>>344301078
>no man's content
>>344307970
i can't stand all that controlled dev gameplay, carefully moving the camera slow and steady, trying to force a cinematic vibe
just let a regular person play it instead of demoing it, shit madz my butt
>>344308157
>no man's pallete
Eh, I look forward to letting some mods delevop then pirating it. Sounds fun to get high and explore the universe
>>344301078
MGSV 2.0.
You´re in for a giant disappointment. Dont follow the hypebeast you remember what happened last time.
>>344303010
It's a cost benefit analysis. They simply cannot develop the game past a certain point because they will almost certainly lose money on it if they did.
>>344303239
That's not how "t." works. Let me FTFY
>t. someone who has no idea how development or video games work
>>344308747
This isn't even close to what MGSV was. MGSV was hyped up by Kojima as THE ULTIMATE CHAPTER TO THE METAL GEAR SAGA, AN OPEN WORLD MASTERPIECE.
This is a small UK studio saying "we wanted to make a comfy space exploration game and the generation system we developed let us make a metric shitload of planets."
>Shill thread
>>344301078
randomly generated planets nothing to do except collect stuff. no story. some ship combat. the end.
>>344310003
Nica damage control, Sony has been hyping this up for years saying that you can literally do anything in the game.
>>344308404
Don't use Bob Ross to shitpost pls
>>344310197
Name one time anyone has said "you can literally do anything."
>>344310353
stfu or I'll post bob ross rule 34
>>344310197
No developer has said you can do anything
Some have gone out of their way to try and keep people from overhyping it (which didn't work)
>>344301078
>everything that's been promised
That's the thing though. What they have promised sounds boring do nothing simulator.
It's like Space Engine but without the actual science.
No tidally locked planets so no buy.
>>344308194
Do you remember the last time someone let a regular person "just play it" https://youtu.be/9yYp8ZeQ-I8
They have to let someone hype the game up. Pleaee dont be dumb anon.
>>344302421
actually its mmo
but the chances of finding another player are around 1%
>>344301078
>EVERYTHING THAT'S BEEN PROMISED
The NMS dev honestly hasn't really promised that much, he's always been quite vague and evasive about everything. It's all pretty much been speculation from the peanut gallery hyping it up.
Just be sure you know what was actually promised and not what a bunch of random people think you're able to do.
From what I've seen of it, it still isn't interesting enough. I need to see more space combat, the most hectic shit possible. Currently it's just been some real simple stuff.
>>344311742
dev said even if you did find someone you couldn't interact, and any changes you made to the area won't be seen by the other player
shady sounding
Spore 2.0
>>344311742
>>344312202
I just want to know if every player model is the same, and what it actually looks like.
>>344301078
>a game made by an entire studio if CIS shitlords
>great
>>344312187
>he's always been quite vague and evasive
the whole reason its getting hate right here, very little real information and al gameplay was just dev driven demoing
maybe it will surprise me, but I've been down this skeptical road before
>>344311742
>>344312202
Actually I think it's an MMO in the same way vanilla Spore was. Literally the only thing you see are major changes other players make to the environment like blowing up space stations, or naming animals. I don't believe you can see other players.
>>344312409
it's never clarified, one of the shady aspects of the game
>>344312440
>the whole reason its getting hate right here
No, it's getting hate because it's cool to pretend Spore was the worst game ever and everything that want to do a space game with a big universe is tainted by it.
The devs really have been clear on most things except on the multiplayer.
No
>>344301078
I'd rather take No Ma'am's Sky
I haven't followed this game for a while. Why's everyone saying it's shit now? A few months ago people were hyped. What went wrong?
>>344312827
>pretend
The thing about Spore is that despite that huge universe it's almost utterly devoid of things to do and the game play sucks. No Man's Sky will suffer from the same thing. The devs will spend all of hteir time creating a huge universe and no time making an actually fun game.
There is literally nothing to do except mine and trade. It's like they tried making a Minecraft and Spore hybrid but took out the gameplay of both.
The goal is to get to "the center of the universe" and to do all you do is mine rocks, buy a ship, go to another planet, mine more rocks for fuel, and then repeat ad infinitum until you get to the center of the universe.
>>344313262
It's the next big release coming up, so it's in people's crosshairs to jack off about being the next 'TORtanic'
>>344313342
Yeah the gameplay look simple, but you're overly simplifying it to the point when it doesn't mean anything, it's like saying "All you do is walk in a room and shoot people, then you walk in another room and shoot other people, oh and you can try to do it faster" and that makes Hotline Miami boring.
>people saying Spore 2.0
>implying spore isnt one of the best games ever made
It's nothing like Spore because Spore promised a lot and didn't deliver. This game hasn't promised anything but a pretty but empty walking simulator and it'll probably deliver on at least that.
>>344301078
>EVERYTHING THAT'S BEEN PROMISED
I still can't understand. Could you link me official info about what they promised?
>>344313726
Aside from picking unnecessary fights, what else is there to do? I'd say my description is pretty accurate.
Spore 2.0
Can somebody please give me a definitive answer on multiplayer. Is it in ANY way possible to see another player physically? No matter how slim the odds.
Because wouldn't that require them to run a server to have everyone in the same universe realtime? And what Sean said how people will probably never see each other,, what's the point running a server?
The problem is they've already shown everything there is to do in the game and everyone is letting their imaginations make them expect more. The game looks boring but you can't really accuse the creators themselves of misleading you.
>>344302256
Sea of Thieves looks like itll be fun for and hour with friends but have no lasting appeal beyond that
>>344314190
From what dev said, it's statistically possibile but almost impossible
>>344307970
so you are just walking around and do what exactly?
>>344314190
that question has been posed and ignored, game is suspect af
>>344314531
exploring, gathering resources, discover planets\species, interact with new life forms and all this kind oh shit you expect. With reaching the center of the galaxy as ultimate goal
>>344314081
Getting better tech to upgrade your suit/gun/ship in order to survive the harsh environment, mine better or have better chance of survival against enemies ships/better way to hide or more opportunity to warp to other star systems, either by stealing it from the factory, getting buddy-buddy with an alien factionn buying it or finding it, discovering aliens words to understand what the NPC talking to you are saying, defending yourself against the hostile fauna/flora that might be present when you mine, then the bots going around on some planets. You can also attack traders ships /space stations or defend them against space pirates to get cash or loot.
Apparently there's a plot too, but there's also some things like a stargate network that can be opened between worlds and if you manage to open one it allow you passage to a riche planet closer to the center of the galaxy so you can fill your pocket. Also heard there were some gadgets too, jetpacks, grenades and hacking devices, maybe there's more.
It definitely isn't empty, it got an average amount of content, although I agree that the pricetag is bloated compared to it, so how well the unvierse is done is essential.
>>344314190
>>344314587
As far as I know, you can name shit if you're the first to see it, and other players see the names.
They keep dodging the question of whether or not you can actually meet other players in the game, so likely you will not be able to, or you will but it will be incredibly underwhelming, like seeing them but not being able to interact
>>344314874
and you do that some concrete reason or just because theres nothing else to do?
>>344315046
>/v/ suddenly cares about the story
>in a fucking space game
Ahahah oh wow, the story could literally just be "BECAUSE I HEARD THERE'S GIRLS IN THERE" for all you should care.
>>344314190
There was an interview a while back where someone asked him if there was multiplayer. Dude had to ask him three times before getting an actual response.
>Is there multiplayer?
The chances of finding another person are almost impossible!
>So there's multiplayer? Will we be able to fight or co op?
That's not the focus of the game!
>If me and a friend go to the same planet at the same time and stand in the same spot, will we see each other?
No.
Wish I could find it again...
>cannot build your base
And they fucking ask 60$ for it
>>344315046
what's the reason behind our space agencies and space exploration?
>>344301228
>>344301276
but all we've seen is traveling; how can it be Spore 2.0 if we know we'll get travelling and nothing else?
Point taken desu.
>>344315173
even in plain space game theres always some objective/progression, all i can see here is walking randomly generated terrain that wont be relevant in next 15 minutes
>>344315470
money
>>344315464
>Hey we made this universe with a number of planet equal to how many porks your mom eat everyday
>How about you set out a base on planet #115105214 so you have to either stay in the same space sector forever or rebuilt it every two days?
>>344315464
Who said that? Of course you can, but don't expect Space-Minecraft. Your goal is to collect resources and move on to the next planet
>>344315632
>objective
Get to the center
>progression
Planets get more dangerous toward the center
Pretty much.
>>344314190
From what I understand, no you aren't going to meet people. You can just see planets and species named by other players, which even in itself is unlikely.
>>344315659
>>344315673
Imagine that it'ss like minecraft, except you can't build anything. What's the fucking point, just colleting resources from the green planet with blue water then moving to the green planet with dark blue water?
>>344301078
>No multiplayer
>>344315673
>Of course you can
Nah you can't, they've been very clear on that. The building you see on some videos were already there when you came.
Honestly I think only Minecraft autists like >>344315826 want a base as it doesn't serve the game in any meaningful way, but having a sort of space tent you can take with you and deploy on comfy planets to get some stamina bonus or whatever could be nice.
>>344301078
>EVERYTHING THAT'S BEEN PROMISED
yeah, fuck all to do
>>344301078
what about multiplayer?
>>344315826
>minecraft, except you can't build anything
again my dearest retarded, you can build and craft a quite lot of shit, but don't expect to play minecraft in the space because game, as opposed to minecraft, isn't focused on the static nature of base-building
keklol i hoppe the guy's suing them wins the rites to this game and never cell it
>>344316249
jesus christ they really are all numales
>>344301078
lol no it's not. I think /v/ is way too pessimistic most of the time but the pessimism is absolutely deserved when it comes to this game. They keep talking about how large the game is all the time, not of the content which will surely be lacking. From what I've seen of the game it looks like a passing novelty.
>>344316529
>hey keep talking about how large the game is all the time, not of the content which will surely be lacking.
This man raises a point
all this media silence and no recent GP videos point to a disappointment, and the lack of co-op exploration makes it even worse.TSUUUUUUUUUUUU
>$60
can i play spore over lan?
>>344316494
You're a cuck.
>>344316494
what's a numale? like a tomale?
>>344317047
What? This game is $60? I thought it was an indie game made by a tiny team?
>>344310167
>implying school shooter frog even has the strength to punch someone
It's basically a walking simulator, but in space.
>60$
Help me /v/, how would you call them?
in tlou you at least had a story
>>344301078
>>344317265
>>344314874
>>344315749
>wanting to get sucked into a supermassive black hole
For what purpose?
>>344311742
1%? Where did that number come from? Either the universe is absolutely tiny, or the game loads you in beside other players in the universe on purpose
>one biome per planet
This bugs me.
I understand that if planets had multiple biomes then the planets would feel less distinct from one another so it isn't worth the extra effort, but what is the point of having large planets of land then if absolutely everything is the same? There is literally no reason to land on one spot of a planet and not another. The planets could have been much smaller, like Spore sized.
>>344317872
to see what's inside
It's just procedurally generated biomes and creatures, I don't get the hype. You're not actually discovering anything
>>344301078
i can't wait to get high and fly around the universe, fly out of worlds and flying into another world with no lag. thats all i care about. everything else is just a bonus
>>344318441
>just
What do you mean "just"? Everyone loves procedural generated shit. It's endless content.
That said, there is more to a game then endless worlds and backgrounds. Skyrim's procedural events add more to a game than a procedural map would.
>>344301228
>>344301276
Why so you call it Spore 2.0 when it's obviously Starbound 3D
>>344318441
>You're not actually discovering anything
This statement of yours makes me question your intelligence and self-awareness.
Are you saying that nobody is actually discovering anything because they aren't real? Or that technically you aren't discovering anything because it's already been generated into the game, without destroying the idea that the game itself says whoever discovers "generated thing" first is it's discoverer.
Either answer and you should go hang yourself immediately for being so fucking stupid that even special education kids would encourage you to die.
"it's just this, i don't understand this, or why people do this" fucking dumb shit faggot.
>>344301078
why does it have to be a fight
games can't just be announced and then come out and be judged
by the time a game comes out in this day and age, in the time between announcement and release people have
>nitpicked every frame of every trailer
>misquoted anyone and everyone in an effort to justify shitposting about it
>found the perfect dev quote to repost endlessly out of context to assure everyone if they think x game will be good, too bad, it will be shit
>already spoiled the entire game for themselves by watching leaked playthroughs, because the excitement of actually playing the game pales in comparison to the thrill of finding new shit to pick apart to justify their prejudicial negative view of the game
everything is like this now, even fucking indie games, nobody ever just sees a game now and thinks "hmm i haven't heard about this, looks fun, i'll buy it"
>>344319019
>"hmm i haven't heard about this, looks fun, i'll buy it"
That's what /v/'s overall reaction to the game was when it was announced back at VGX 2013. It was largely considered the only interesting looking game at the whole show
>>344319246
yeah too bad the game's had time to incubate in the echo chamber that is /v/ and now people will deny that they were ever interested in it, and then copypaste some dumb shit they saw other retards posting ad nauseum, to kill all potential discussion pre-emptively
![jew-money[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/6LJzlUf.jpg "jew-money[1].jpg")
>>344302414
>>344318169
The sense of scale I assume. Spore-sized planets are much less impressive.
>>344319246
Then the PC version was revealed and everyone could stop pretending because it wasn't Sony exclusive.
>>344319872
I'm super miffed that there will be no tidally locked planets. I'm sticking with Space Engine. Russians do it best.
Honestly wouldn't mind a feature of an added second class of spaceship like a frigate which is used to make your warp jumps. You could customize and upgrade that and your small ship is docked inside that and you use that to land on the surface.
And you can deck out your frigate with comfy shit and have a little area you can walk around in too
>>344320156
>a looking at things simulator is better than a game that lets you explore planets
>>344319019
it made me so happy when DOOM turned out to be good, it was so refreshing to have a game look like dog shit but end up being great for once.
>>344320628
>>344320338
like the cyclops in subnautica?
>>344320969
>mfw i witnessed /v/ being BTFO again
its gonna happen again, Deus ex HR and DOOM did it and it was glorious
>>344320969
not to say /v/ shitposters didn't still try to make it seem terrible, fortunately the reception was so overwhelmingly positive that the shitposters had no ammo and gave up right away
honestly Doom4 was refreshing for me as well since everything about it seemed doomed to be shitposted into obscurity
>numberless reboot title (turned out not to be a reboot)
>denuvo with no crack (turned out to be worth the money)
>fucking horrible MP beta (turned out MP was developed by halo5 devs which explained why it was shit)
>>344320969
>>344321225
What was so good about it?
It was slow, full of QTE kills and the MP is garbage. I guess the campaign is okay, but that doesn't carry the $60 game and make it good.
>>344319019
Because people don't want to blindly spend their money on something without seeing the flaws first?
>>344302040
>current year
>not wanting to trade rocks
>>344321117
They're not comparable, retard.
Pretending otherwise is literally showing that you're mentally damaged.
>>344320628
Tbh building a giant cruiser and attempting to leave to atmosphere but ending up in a spectacular crash is pretty neat
>>344321298
wow star citizen is so beautiful
>>344321502
do you not see how that is absolutely the wrong attitude to have? you are approaching every goddamn thing expecting to find flaws, expecting to find something that will turn you off of it, in fact you actively search for things to be dissatisfied with right away
you have forgotten the feeling of playing a game for the first time with no preconceived notions or prejudices, the feeling of being hopeful that your experience will be fun and rewarding.
but no it's easier to just hate everything and assume that everyone is trying to scam you out of your money.
>>344321451
you're months late but good try
>>344321936
>you should be blindly spending your money
Thanks for the info shill
>>344312439
>if
>>344323021
why must you grossly oversimplify everything into whatever justifies a shitter reply man?
of course "being open-minded" has to = "BLINDLY THROW UR MONEY AWAY LOL SHILLS IM A SMART CONSUMER I NEVR GET TRICKED!"
>>344321936
>being critical is bad
>analyzing something to see if it's a game you'll like is bad
>>344320151
PC version was listed as on the table for a while before it was announced
>>344323381
Do you buy every game that has a good trailer because it looked fun? Because that's what your post implied.
>>344321298
See, that looks great, sure, but it's also empty. It's silly, but NMS got hyped because people wanted a game with planets that were something others than dull rocks.
>was supposed to be out a month ago
>Is now supposed to be out in one month
>still no public demonstration of the game
>no gameplay video longer than 20 minutes
This game doesn't even exist, does it?
>>344321298
>>344321609
This game spooks me
Day 1 pirate senpai
>>344324468
just pirate my shit up senpai
>>344323698
because you don't 'analyze'. you just find excuses not to like it, no matter what it is. then you nitpick it to death so that you have ammunition to shout down anyone who says they are looking forward to it.
you don't want new games to be good. you EXPECT them to be bad. and when it turns out not to be bad, shitposters either keep pretending like all their fears were validated and tell anyone who is enjoying themselves that they are wrong and should kill themselves for having different opinions
>>344324393
Yeah, the devs are planning to mass suicide on release date. And they'll send the pre-orders profit to you cause you're the first one to have figured it out.
You faggots have been saying it's the end of good video games for years.
It's not the end you're just getting old and you're fucking miserable.
You're all absolutely fucking pathetic. Good games are still being made but you just can't be happy. You can't even be happy playing you're only hobby.
I can't wait for this board to die and for the rest of you to end your worthless lives.
Game will probably suck, but at least the music will be on point.
https://soundcloud.com/65daysofstatic/supermoon
>>344324468
I mean it's gonna be released on GoG so go for it
>>344324318
Except Space Engine creates realistic procedural planets and star systems. Not some fantasy realm on tier with Lord of the Rings. That might not float some peoples' boat but you can't blame others for loving Space Engine for it.
>discover tidally locked speck of a oceania planet from several AUs away
>read details
>orbital period equals rotation period
>"Oh, that means it's frozen on one side... bah, but they probably didn't program that into the procedural code"
>tfw you get there and it is indeed frozen on one side
Also Space Engine is free.
>>344311742
the mutliplayer is a hoax
>>344324686
You don't know what I do nigga. I look forward to games if they have enough info to say that they're good. NMS isn't one of them, it looks like vague and empty shit.
>>344325040
Oh yeah, I have nothing against Space Engine, but saying it's better than NMS because it's realistic is retarded, because it's clear that realism wasn't involved in anything NMS did.
>>344301078
/v/ I fucked up I fucked up
Colleague saved me lots of money by detecting mistake in one of my manufacturing process and now he wants a reward.
I said I will buy him No Man's Sky but I don't want to throw 60 € for this piece of shit game.
What do?An hero is not a valid option
>>344325174
"vague and empty shit" is a vague and empty shitty metaphor
>>344324318
Most planets have nothing but dull rocks.
>>344325254
>He's buying NMS on PS4
>He's not buying the PC version on one of many key sites for much cheaper
All these motherfuckers that don't know how to buy properly
>>344325308
I don't have to explain it to you, it's what I think. All you're doing is saying people can't dislike games before they're released at all.
>>344325174
>it looks like vague and empty shit.
https://repo.nmsdb.info/
There you go, now you can inform yourself so you can drop the "vague" and just decide which part you think is shit.
>>344325438
I originally planned to buy it on G2A but it's not even 5 euro cheaper than on Steam Store.
>>344325438
>not having money to burn.
>>344325551
Wait for the inevitable GMG 25% off sale before the game comes out
>>344325510
>I don't have to explain it to you
yes you do faggot or don't fucking reply in the first place
You guys realize why it was delayed, right?
It got delayed because the word "Sky" was apparently copyrighted, they had been struggling with it for 3 years.
Do we even have gameplay footage of this? Or anything to back up the
>BILLIONS AND BILLIONS OF MOUNTAINS THAT YOU CAN CLIMB
beyond shills?
Tfw gonna observe the shitstorm when this game is released and pick it up for half price on black friday
>>344315493
Spore promised revolutionary evolution gameplay.
Look at it.
Adapt to No Future's Sky.
>>344324937
I've been listening to this band for like nine years. So cool.
>>344325217
>it's clear that realism wasn't involved in anything NMS did.
That's my point. That's one point from Space Engine. The proceduraly generated planets would be interesting by themselves, despite gameplay, only if they were realistic.
>>344325725
Actually it wasn't because of that, but the end of that issue did have nice timing
Rumor has it the reason was because the PS4 version still wasn't up to snuff with how well the dev team wanted it to play
>>344324706
>Yeah, the devs are planning to mass suicide on release date.
That would actually be cool. Cooler than anything they could've produced otherwise.
>There are people in here that hates on this game and havent even watched the gameplay videos
>>344325752
You're telling you're too retarded to type "nms gameplay" on youtube?
>>344325752
Nope. And we have little evidence of how diverse the lifeforms will be.
>>344325974
not that it would matter, you just accuse them of never having played the game anyway
It will be fun for a few days, then everyone will realize that every planet is randomly generated and an algorithm can never create truly great content. Then people get bored of planet b being the same as planet a except the leaves on trees have a slightly lighter shade of pink.
The procedural generation exploration meme will strike with full force
>>344326096
How do ou accuse someone of something that is factually true in the discussion.
>>344325983
That would sum up most of /v/, yes.
will a 480 be able to max it out at 1080? don't really care about this meme game if not
>>344326220
>and an algorithm can never create truly great content
Why.
People keep saying that, but it seems like the sort of thing that's just repeated as truth without putting any particular thoughts into it. You do realize there's a guy behind the algorithm who's in charge of making it not suck?
>>344326291
Because none of this applies to people who defend or hype the game up for some reason. It's only a prerequiste to discuss it if you're a skeptic because reasons.
>>344326382
>People are too stupid to take 10 seconds to look up system requirements on Steam
MINIMUM:
OS: Windows 7
Processor: Intel Core i3
Memory: 8 GB RAM
Graphics: nVidia GTX 480
Storage: 10 GB available space
So no you're fucked
Yea and pokemon go is the IRL pokemon game to end all pokemon games like some of the fuckers on this board sadly believed.
Get realistic expectations. ITS SO FUCKING EASY to know if a game is going to be bland, if its going to be boring, if its going to be repetitive. Fuck you can even tell if the mechanics or solid or not from gameplay videos.
Have fun with Starbound 2: Electric boogaloo : 1.5x The Dimensions 0.001x the content.
>>344326481
Sound like you're both putting words in the other's mouth because you can't discuss the game without attacking the people interested in it or calling it shit.
>>344312827
Spore was documented to have one of if the worst development cycles ever. It was engineers vs marketers the whole time. The team was literally split
>>344326074
https://youtu.be/h-kifCYToAU?t=1312
21:52 faggot.
>>344326453
Yeah good luck making that work.
We've seen countless games with procedurally generated worlds. They just lack the attention to detail, naturally, that a handcrafted world has.
Just consider Minecraft. How fun is it really to run around exploring in Minecraft? Fun for an hour? Sure. A few hours? Yeah. Some days? Okay.
But then it gets stale and you keep seeing the same stuff over and over.
>>344317265
Sony
>>344326621
It's true though. Nobody is putting words in anyone's mouth.
"you haven't watched videos" and "you haven't even played it" are accusations that are levied exclusively against people calling it shit. People defending it and hyping it up haven't played it and many haven't seen the videos, but that doesn't matter for some reason.
>you can't discuss the game without attacking the people interested in it
Pot calling the kettle black. You can't respond to skeptics without attacking them in the first place.
>>344326749
Literally what I just mentioned a few posts above.
Many of those variants are just "it's the same thing but now with pink stripes on its side instead of purple"
>>344326585
>People think the developers who's last game was JOE DANGER will make the next AAA title
>The dev's who make phone games for your computer will make a game that will keep you entertained for 87 QUIZUBBLE BILLION YEARS
also
>Around 11:50 GI asks if they're going to become the EVANGELIST of procedural generation because he's a brainwashed fuck who will buy an indie game for $60
>Even the dev replies by subtly telling him to lower his expectations
>>344325874
Same, ever since The Fall of Math.
>>344326760
Except Minecraft and NMS have a big difference : Minecraft is made of a limited number of block, while NMS works by twisting existing shapes to create diversity. That's a pretty big difference you see to believe is irrelevant.
Also for all the "countless games" you're talking about, people always only bring up Spore, Minecraft and Starbound. And it's fucking retarded to call a game shit because it's trying to do something no one ever did right before, might as well just pre-order Assassin's Creed 8 if you shit on indies taking risks.
>tfw you just want a game where you can fly ships in and out of atmospheres seamlessly
>>344327084
I'm all for being positively surprised by this game, I hope it happens, but I'm just not that optimistic right now I guess.
It would be ground breaking if this game delivered what seemingly everyone expects it to.
I agree with the sentiment that random generation sucks!
After all, why have randomly generated large amounts of content, when I could have HAND CRAFTED nothingness, like Xenoblade?If you don't get the point i'm trying to make here you should kill yourself
>>344326830
>"you haven't watched videos" and "you haven't even played it" are accusations that are levied exclusively against people calling it shit
I might've simply missed them in this thread but I haven't seen them. Anyway I also agree that it's retarded.
>You can't respond to skeptics without attacking them in the first place.
What about all the post linking to articles or site explaining what do you do in the game or gameplay videos that are almost always ignored when people asked for them or quoted to pretend nothing happens for 20 minutes when it's factually wrong? It's a literal fact that NMS threads are full of shitposters who spent the last year spamming "what do you do", I think that if you have doubt on the game asking to be spoonfeed because you're too lazy to skip through a 20 minute video isn't making your argument seem well-founded.
>>344326853
Its because its a variation you fuckwit. The creatures are generated from the ground up with feet, legs, torso, head, horns, and other features that all are effected by scaling of different body parts which actually effect its vocals.
https://youtu.be/CLcjvIQJns0?t=546
The game has fucking rabbit velociraptors for christ sake.
>>344327532
9:06 for the rabbiraptors
>>344326853
Well obviously they're variations of the same creature model
>>344327460
Those 20 minute videos don't address many of the questions people are "spamming" in the game.
>It is a literal fact.
Accusing everyone who points this out of being a lazy shitposter who needs to be "spoonfed" and trying to posture it as factual isn't making your argument seem well-founded. In fact it's exactly the type of ad hominem attacks you ironically accused me of earlier.
>>344301078
nu males sky
>>344319517
yes /v/ was excited but now its over, your game is too little too late
>>344301078
Except they haven't promised us jack shit. Here is what was promised
>an almost endless supply of randomly generated planets to explore, each with its own randomly generated flora and fauna that pull from a base set of physic creature attributes and combine them
>ability to name said creatures and planets if you're the first to find them
>mining (shooting at) resources for.... something?
> ability to shoot creatures
>drone things that harass you if you mine too much or kill too many animals unprovoked
> flying around
>some undisclosed thing at the center of the galaxy
And that's basically it. And while it's true that they aren't overpromising (except for probably whatever Peter Molyneaux level revelation is at the center of the galaxy), what they have shown so far seems to be proving that A. there isn't exactly a lot to any of these features, and B. there isn't anything BEYOND these features. It comes down to a lot of content but not much substance to any of it because it all ends up being the same thing with slight tweaks. There's no conventional multiplayer to enjoy this exploration with others, there's no space combat, there's little in the way of customization or player advancement/growth. There's just a lot of what is essentially nothing. It seems like you're really just going to be dropping in on these planets for a few minutes, grabbing some resources to let your ship go deeper into the galaxy, and ditching after you've pissed off the space fun police to do the same on a new planet. The charm of "ooh" ing and "ah"ing at the new randomly generated animals and scenery is going to wear thin after a while because there's nothing meaningful to do with ANY of it.
>>344328758
the best post in thread
>>344329081
And I can't wait!
It'll be like Black Desert Online, like Dark Souls 3, like Total War: Warhammer!
Games I play for 50-100 hours then become extremely depressed when delving back into boredom.
>>344301228
FPBP
>>344328638
Anon, if you don't know most of the "complains" about NMS are plain and simple shitposting, you need to lurk more.
>isn't making your argument seem well-founded
What argument? You're getting lost there, in this discussion I haven't mentioned my opinion on the game once.
>>344327318
xenoblade was fucking great though.
>>344329081
>there isn't anything BEYOND these features
Serious question here, why do you lie about the game?
Is this some kind of advanced shilling? You're pretending to not be interested in the game, but then your reasons are retarded as fuck so people create a link between being a retard and not buying the game? That's getting way too deep for me.
>>344327318
xenoblade was more than walking around rocks
>mfw I find a planet made of candy inhabited by naked nympho lolis all looking for spaceman schlong
gonna get rich selling the planets coordinates on ebay
>>344301078
I'm looking forward to it, it's not like I'll lose anything if it does suck anyway since it's free on PC
Fuck this game
>>344326749
I just dont understand how the animations for the creatures work, how it fits with the creatures rigging in places like the mouth and stuff on all the variants.
>>344331481
Jesus christ, fuck off you humongous autist. Go spout your fucking memes on reddit.
>>344324417
I'm still scared shitless by black holes.
>>344326749
I hope they have more than quadrupeds and bipeds in game.
>>344302818
Exactly this.
