WIR WAREN KAISER UND SCHEIßE
>>344141605
Talk about historical inaccuracy.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_rGxNNure0g
>Wir Waren Kameraden
>>344141680
This game is 100% historically accurate, the developers have said so.
>>344141605
Man idgaf i play black people from time to time anyway 'cause you can make some pretty dank lookin ones, like in GTA V for example. As long as the game is fun, the characters can be purple for all i care
>>344141747
oh okay, my mistake
>>344141680
How so? Germany had african colonies
>>344142106
1 swedish krone was transferred to your KuckSchedBank account
There were black soldiers, but they were very, very few and were probably treated horribly due to being seen as an inferior race.
There's probably some ignored documentation on it because of how we, as good goys, can only see jews as the only people wronged in Nazi Germany during ww2
>>344141605
game looks like garbage
went full CoD run and gun no front line people everywhere bullshit
>>344141605
WE WUZ BRITISH
Does this game has at least 20% of white people? I mean, white people become minority and shit. Feel oppressed already.
>>344142106
in africa you dumb fuck
In the real world the germans thought africans were basically animals.
>>344142106
you think they ported them over to fight on the mainland in integrated platoons? because that didn't happen
>>344142747
That's funny because Germans were basically animals then.
Why even bother saying they will go for realism? This pisses everyone off, why not just do what wolfenstein did and go crazy with the story? Them adding all these races is as crazy as robot hitler.
>>344142106
99% of people on the European battlefield during WW1 were white. There were few blacks from colonies that happedned to be there but it was rarity.
Game still presents you that at least 50% of people there were black or Indian or whatever.
>>344142519
WEWUZ BRI'ISH N SHITE.
>>344142519
In DICEs defense, when it comes to England they probably couldn't find enough white English actors IRL for modelling and mocap.
>>344142857
Someone asked them why they were going for an alternate history setting and they got upset on stream and started saying they did they best to assure that the game was completely historically accurate.
>>344142845
oh boy.
>>344142190
1?? Only 1?!? Tell your manager to stick das boot up you aß!
>>344142845
We're all animals. Only the Romans were true humans.
>>344143052
Carthaginians*
Rome was a mistake.
>>344142845
>>344142857
No, that would be CoD target audience. Battlefield audience jerking off on realistic warfare. Almost the same thing, they're just trying to feel fancy about it.
>>344143113
Shut up Hannibal and go suck that elephant dong
>>344142963
>airship that withstands fire (it's just fabric full of hydrogen)
>automatic guns everywhere
>tanks going at 50 km/h
>everyone is black
>>344141605
Poor Bismark would find no rest, if he knew about this stuff.
Also, good (trailer) music
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oKkRS4rL6Pw
Makes me wonder if dice ever goes back to ww2 setting what they will think of doing then.
>tfw no black nazi option in WW2 games
I just wanna be swasta and cap dumkopfs with my homeboy Adolf.
>>344142519
>Australian soldier
>Black
>Not even aboriginal
are they even fucking trying?
WHERE ARE THE LATINO GERMANS
WHERE ARE THE ASIAN GERMANS
WHERE ARE THE NATIVE AMERICAN GERMANS
PANDERING HYPOCRITES
PANDERING HYPOCRITES
PANDERING HYPOCRITES
PANDERING HYPOCRITES
>>344143298
Bismark was long dead before WW1 happened, anon.
>>344142519
Fair enough, a lot of Sikhs fought and died for the Empire but very little abos fought in the World Wars with only 500-600 fighting in WW1.
>>344143886
Most abo casualties were roadkills, with some of them showing up drunk on german held roads.
>>344144031
I never said they fought well.
>>344143807
>people who turn around in their graves are generally dead
>that is the entire point of this expression
Why would he turn around in his grave you may ask? Well he was the architect of the united Germany, a political genius and would probably have some choice words about this historical fantasy version we get today.
Sweden should be nuked.
>>344142903
300,000 Indian Muslims fought for Britain in WW1
CHARACTER
CUSTOMIZATION
IS
CONFIRMED
>>344144249
It would make more sense to say that Bismark would be rolling in their grave about actual WW1 instead of some dumb virtual game from a century after. TBQHWTYF
>>344144317
Not mostly in Europe. And that's moving the goal posts
It's just funny how the Indian troops speak exactly the same as the British troops.
>>344143368
why the fuck is he even holding the pistol like that?
>>344144320
BUT
DOES
IT
ALLOW
YOU
TO
CHANGE
YOUR
RACE?
Man, didn't DICE exclude female soldiers from BF1 because it would be too unrealistic? What's with the double standard?
>>344144615
It's an edit.
Whoever made that image put the gun in a gangster grip to reinforce the "forced black people" meme.
>>344144821
YES
>>344145093
Do you have a screenshot of this?
>>344144821
Yes. You can play whitey all you like and keep pretending other races don't exist.
>>344142362
>but they were very, very few
There were 350,000 black troops from America alone, not to mention all the colonial black troops fielded by France and Britain.
>>344142106
DELETE THIS
>>344142935
>>344144915
They exclude it because they teabagging is misogynist unlike cod where equality means exactly what it means.
>>344145159
I meant from Germany, numbnuts
>>344142845
>Then
Try "now" and also "always"
What a schmuddel.
Whilst it's inaccurate to have black troops in with the British and German armies, I do like the inclusion of Indians with the British, they were some crazy motherfuckers. A Sikh soldier got the Victoria Cross after charging a machine gun nest with a lance, a fucking LANCE.
>>344144951
They are forced, the devs themselves said it was an intentional move.
>>344145135
The alpha files confirm multiple faces to choose from.
>>344145296
>inaccurate to have black troops in with the British and German armies
Both had major colonial interests in Africa. Namibia amongst other countries that I can't remember were German, while England had South Africa, Kenya etc
>>344145291
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ztOV2wrrkY
>>344145435
Fighting in Africa, not in France.
>>344141605
>lever-action
>rof 1800
what the fuck
>>344143260
Airships were ribbed and chambered, they didn't go down from small arms fire.
>>344142903
They made 10% of french fighting troops so not 99% but as far as germany is concerned their colonial troops didn't fight in Europe
>>344145540
I didn't see that, can't be right surely, that'd be almost twice as fast as the CZ3A1 from Battlefield 4.
>>344141605
It doesn't matter anyway, I doubt you'll see many people playing as a nigger in this game.
So is there a macro image listing all the gratuitous bullshit that makes this a regular Battlefield game but not a World War One game, per se?
>>344141747
No they didn't.
It says something about this shitty society when you're not even allowed to make an accurate representation of WW1 without adding in niggers and indians where their definitely was not any.
Why do the SJW's ruin everything? I honestly wouldn't bat an eyelid if there was a gay scene in this game where a black disabled trans person with pink hair bangs a indian retarded double amputee on top of a pile of hair dye boxes whilst freebleeding
>>344143612
it's racist to depict PoCs realistically
>>344142935
>>344142747
>In the real world the germans thought africans were basically animals
>pretending like you know the mentality of germans back then
Stop. Kill yourself m8.
>>344144915
that was just a bullshit excuse. the real reason was because the smaller female hit boxes fucked up balance
>>344142106
And Germany was cut off from her colonies the minute the war started.
The French had some algerian and nigger troops, the British had a buttload of Indian troops, but there was simply no non-whites fighting for Germany on the Western Front.
>>344145913
because you retards shit on pol when theyre the only ones left who are against sjws. but hey theyre so bad lmao fuck off!!!
>>344145540
Yeah that's what I really want to know, don't really care about the nigger.
>>344145828
http://venturebeat.com/2016/05/06/ea-dices-lead-designer-answers-our-questions-about-battlefield-1/
>GamesBeat: When things started leaking a bit, people were positioning this as an alternate history of World War One. Is there any alternate history to this, or is it purely historical?
>Berlin: It’s definitely rooted in history. There’s no alternate mix of anything else. All the stuff you see is equipment that was available. All the vehicles you see were available at this time.
The Allies spread misinformation about their black soldiers. That they were tribal warriors from the darkest heart of Africa and that they would eat the corpses of Germans.
>>344145913
>niggers and indians where their definitely was not any.
Learn your history, friend.
>>344146137
To be fair, niggers were fucking savage before civilized by Europe.
>>344145913
>not even allowed
Curious, I didn't know the moral police visited Dice to tell them what was acceptable
>>344146191
>were
>>344146085
>rooted in history means 100% accurate
>>344146085
lrn2read you fucking moron.
It said the equipment and vehicles were historical.
He also said it was rooted in it, that doesn't mean it is entirely accurate, you moron.
>>344145963
the attitude of the nazis towards black people was well documented. Google jesse owens and Hitler you dumb fucking ignoramus
>>344145540
There have been trick shooters in the wild west who could reach that rof with a lever action.
It's all rooted in history :^)
>>344146085
>All the stuff you see is equipment that was available. All the vehicles you see were available at this time.
But never used in large-scale number, or non-existent before the last few months.
>>344146290
>HURRRR ALL GERMANS WERE NAZIS
Get fucking rekt, retard.
>>344145963
Almost all Europeans did back in the day.
Niggers would be listed under the "fauna" sections of travel guides and biological surveys.
It's only in the last few decades that people started treating these beast like they're humans, and the shitskins have yet to show any gratitude.
>>344146304
Game obviously takes place in the last few months then
Also explains the absence of Russia
Would've been inaccurate to include them :^)
>>344146487
The game has battles from all over the war, but most of the are concentrated in 1918.
>>344146304
Why can't people understand its a game and they need to make sacrifices for realism. A lot of the guns in most of the battlefields were either a prototype or didn't see any combat.
>>344146290
Hitler congratulated jesse owens and jesse owens himself says this and that his american president didn't even congratulate him or talk to him.
>>344146629
Because WW1 has some potential for unique and innovative gameplay, but they're just basically rereleasing Battlefield 3 again but with a bunch of WW1 skins.
>>344146621
The year when everyone was eating saw dust, there was dead 15 year olds in the trenches, and dwindling morale and resources from all sides until usa launched some offensives for the allies. very exciting year!
>>344146304
>rooted in history
Do you niggers even understand English? He NEVER said 100% accuracy.
>>344142747
Were they wrong?
>>344145145
Thanks, Jamal.
>>344144464
No, mostly in europe, actually read papers about this, there were several divisions moved immediately and many more later on. The germsns couldn't get anyone from Africa to europe so they used colonial soldiers as a propaganda tool, claiming that the french and british were betraying the white race and things like that. I'd link some papers about it but every time I do no one reads them.
But mostly it's fucking multiplayer, let people customise however they want.
>>344146723
Despite how much I'd love to see a AAA-budgeted Verdun I'm not stupid or naive enough to think that it would be made today considering the industry and consumers. No one should be surprised that the majority of this game was mostly automatics and other nonsense to appeal to the people that actually play these games.
>>344146730
>The year when everyone was eating saw dust, there was dead 15 year olds in the trenches, and dwindling morale and resources from all sides until usa launched some offensives for the allies. very exciting year!
>what is Kaiserschlacht
>>344146723
ww1 doesn't offer shit aside from trenches which already got boring after playing red orchestra and verdun.
To deny the gameflow and mechanics aren't different from 3 is to deny reality.
>>344146487
They simply didn't want to include "good white guys".
>>344145540
>>344146298
>placeholders
>>344146924
Link the papers senpai.
>>344147115
https://web.viu.ca/davies/H482.WWI/ColonialTroopsWWl.pdf
>>344147069
>They simply didn't want to include "good white guys".
Get over your massive persecution complex, seriously. This is bordering on the delusional.
>>344141605
Sieg Kaiser Reinhard!
>>344147069
Implying they would have not filled Russian armies with Mongols, Manchurians or some central Asians or some shit like that.
>HURR THERE WERE A FEW APES FIGHTING FOR GERMANY IN AFRICA HURR THIS MEANS IT'S FINE FOR A GAME TO BE 90% NIGGERS
Fucking tired of you nigger apologists. Fucking sjw cunts, back to lereddit.
>>344146137
That sounds fucking awesome.
Horror game set in WWI where you're a German being stalked by niggers when?
It'll be just like Der Unbekannte Krieg
>TR
>MA
What did he mean by this?
>>344141605
>mfw historically ignorant white supremicists don't realize all major European powers drew hundreds of thousands of black men from their holdings in Africa to fight on the western front as well as in Africa.
England alone had numbers close to a million African troops fighting.
>>344147159
>Some 150,000 Indian soldiers were deployed in Europe from September 1914 on. The overwhelming majority of Indian troops, however, fought in Mesopotamia against the Ottoman empire.11
OK...
>REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE, WW1 WAS WHITE MANS WAR WHITE MAN WON THE FREE WORLD BLACK PEOPLE WERENT INVENTED YET OMG IM SO TRIGGERED IM HYPERVENTILATING
>>344147585
Which involved lots of doing not a lot. The fighting was far more intense on the west.
150,000 fighting is more fighting than 300,000 most of whom are sat garrisoning and being sieges.
>>344147721
Back to tumblr!
>>344147501
>I enjoy making things up
>>344147741
So in other words you are wrong. Beat it.
>>344147721
Wow, what a faggot
>>344147478
Trench and Marksman.
>>344147774
Not even close. It's funny how many people think WW1 was fought entirely by white people. France used black units to spearhead assaults all the time.
>>344147862
Deployment is not the same as fighting, if you think that marching to Kut is as intense as being at the battle of Ypres then, whatever I guess.
>>344147896
Thanks
>>344147831
You should know how afrocentrists are by now.
>>344147721
>REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>>/reddit/
>>344146085
>all the stuff you see is equipment that was available.
like the gewehr 43, which came out decades after the first world war?
>The following estimates of deaths, within contemporary borders, during World War I were made by a Russian historian Vadim Erlikman in a 2004 handbook of human losses in the 20th century. Erlikman's estimates are based on sources published in the Soviet Union and Russia.[92]
Algeria (1914 known as French Algeria): 26,000
Vietnam (1914 known as French Indochina): 12,000
Mali (1914 part of French West Africa): 60,000
Morocco (1914 known as the French protectorate of Morocco): 8,000
Senegal (1914 part of French West Africa): 36,000
Guinea (1914 part of French West Africa): 14,500
Madagascar: 2,500 military
Benin (1914 part of French West Africa): 27,000
Burkina Faso (1914 part of French West Africa): 17,000
Republic of the Congo (1914 part of French Equatorial Africa): 32,000
Ivory Coast (1914 part of French West Africa): 12,000
Tunisia (1914 known as French Tunisia): 2,000
Chad (1914 part of French Equatorial Africa): 1,500
Central African Republic (1914 known as French Oubangui-Chari): 1,000
Niger (1914 part of French West Africa): 1,000
Gabon (1914 part of French Equatorial Africa): 10,500
>>344147406
Deal with it
>>344147930
Still no 300,000 Indians fighting in Europe.
>>344147998
>russian
>German Empire German colonies
The following estimates of deaths, within contemporary borders, during World War I were made by a Russian historian Vadim Erlikman in a 2004 handbook of human losses in the 20th century. Erlikman's estimates are based on sources published in the Soviet Union and Russia.[93]
Tanzania (1914 part of German East Africa): 50,000
Namibia (1914 known as German South-West Africa): 1,000
Cameroon (1914 known as Kamerun): 5,000 military and 50,000
Togo (1914 known as German Togoland): 2,000
Rwanda (1914 part of German East Africa): 15,000
>no black people in ww1
>The Harlem Hellfighters
Look it up and go fuck yourselves
>>344147953
I want someone to make a movie about Irish slaves, just so the SJWs can start doing backflips over themselves about how exceptions no longer affect the rule.
>>344147998
We're not discussing whether or not blacks were involved in WW1 but pointing out their unrealistic prominence on the western front in Battlefield 1.
>>344148061
>>344148074
Oh actually I misread what he means, disregard.
>>344147998
all these french niggers, yet france isn't in the game.
>>344148121
The thing that pisses me off the most is the claiming of Hannibal to be black
>>344147385
but russians are mongoloids to begin with
>>344148150
Don't be dishonest, this isn't about historicity, it's about either not liking black people or about lashing out against "those SJWs"
If it was about historicity the massive amount of other unrealistic things would draw far more attention, they don't, it's all focused around the black soldiers.
>>344148150
These are not minor numbers. An average significant battle in WW1 had around. 50-100k casualties There are several large battles worth of casualties from African holdings on both sides. The Entente was pumping troops out of africa to outnumber the German's
>>344147998
>Niger
>>344148283
>United Kingdom British colonies
>Britain recruited Indian, Chinese, native South African, Egyptian and other overseas labour to provide logistical support in the combat theatres.[101] Included with British casualties in East Africa are the deaths of 44,911 recruited labourers.[102] The CWGC reports that nearly 2,000 workers from the Chinese Labour Corps are buried with British war dead in France.[103]
>The following estimates of British Empire colonial military deaths, within contemporary borders, during World War I were made by a Russian historian Vadim Erlikman in a 2004 handbook of human losses in the 20th century. Erlikman's estimates are based on sources published in the Soviet Union and Russia.[104]
Ghana (1914 known as the Gold Coast): 16,200
Kenya (1914 known as British East Africa): 32,000
Malawi (1914 known as Nyasaland): 3,000
Nigeria (1914 part of British West Africa): 85,000
Sierra Leone (1914 part of British West Africa): 1,000
Uganda (1914 known as the Uganda Protectorate): 1,500
Zambia (1914 known as Northern Rhodesia): 2,000
Zimbabwe (1914 known as Southern Rhodesia): 5,716 persons of European origin served in the war, of whom about 700 were killed, or died of wounds or other causes. In explicitly Rhodesian units, 127 were killed, 24 died of wounds, 101 died of disease or other causes and 294 were wounded. Of the territory's black African servicemen, 31 were killed in action, 142 died of other causes and 116 were wounded.[105]
>>344148374
Look, it's the same guy who was wrong about the 300k Indians in Europe, now shilling for niggers to someone else.
WE WUZ EUROPE N SHIET
>>344148504
Sorry, I'm not that guy.
I just find it ridiculous that people are so offended by seeing a black person on the western front in WW1. There were hundreds of thousands of them. The only issue I can find with their presence is that they weren't usually fighting in units alongside white people.
>>344148504
I like how you're pulling numbers out of your ass to cover up your own lack of information on the topic. That or you can't read, though it's probably both.
>>344147998
>>344147998
If you were trying to prove niggers had any role in WW1, you just shot yourself in the foot.
Those are nothing compared to the overall number of casualties the war.
>>344148365
You haven't seen the constant complaint about the weapons? You're just being dishonest now.
I'm not buying the game for that reason alone.
>>344148365
It's about forcing diversity where it's not needed. The U.S.A. team in BF4 could have consisted of only black people and I couldn't have cared less but to go out of your way to make 75% of the British team black in WW1 is just ridiculous.
>>344148365
fuck off nigger
Imagine if Europe never colonized or enslaved niggers
>No niggers in western world
>All niggers contained in their shitholes, probably all still living in huts made of poop, throwing spears at each other
>>344148685
It's nowhere NEAR as loud.
>>344148737
It's nowhere near as visible.
>>344142935
hehehe
>>344148631
You might want to have memory longer than a gold fishes', because that's exactly the kind of claims you started the discussion with.
>>344146170
I meant fighting in the British army
>>344146198
Be reasonable, they will have conducted multiple focus groups, some of which will have made comments about the lack of diversity. Developers use these retards as sounding boards for what the overall market wants.
>>344148685
700k British troops died.
Near 140k of them were from holdings of the British empire in Africa? How is over 1/7 British dead an insignificant number?
>>344148871
>Be reasonable, they will have conducted multiple focus groups, some of which will have made comments about the lack of diversity. Developers use these retards as sounding boards for what the overall market wants.
Catering to what the customers want is something every good business does
That's something entirely different from being 'allowed' or forbidden to put things in your game
>>344148654
>>344148963
Replied to the wrong guy.
These guys were never used on the western front, even though they did exist;
/de.metapedia.org/wiki/Reichsneger
It's not like DICE devs care about any of this in a historical sense though.
They just want to shove all this hamfisted blackwashing and feminist bullshit (playable female bedouin, female announcer in multiplayer etc) into the game to suit their SJW agenda and disrespect the millions of whites who died on the western front.
>>344148737
Of course it isn't. Weapons or vehicles not being historically accurate is at least somewhat excusable, since those things at least have an impact on the gameplay.
Including a bunch of niggers in the game while Russians and French are conspicuously absent is historical revisionism for historical revisionism's sake. It's nothing short of blackwashing.
>>344147721
>WW1 WAS WHITE MANS WAR
It was though, which is why we're angry that niggers are the focus of this game and depicted as being 50% of combatants despite the fact that they were less than 1% , specially since most people are completely ignorant of WW1 and they'll actually believe DICE's shameless rewrite of history to be true
>>344148462
>Look guys these numbers
So where are you wrong you fucking faggot:
So far every battle shown were fought in fucking France.
And France isnt even included, the country where 11! million people fought activly against the Germans is not in the Main game.
The country who has still areasa that are contaminated because of cyanide is not represented in a game about Wolrd War 1.
The country that has scars 100 years after the thousands of grenade shells exploded in Verdun is not in the game.
And now what do we have in the Main game?
Black people that represented less than 0,5% of the soldiers fighting in the big european war, the war that was fought mainly in fucking europe.
You know why people are pissed?
Because EA is pandering thats why, they are pandering to political correctness defined by american Standarts in a game about european soldiers fighting for european countries.
I dont even care about the Harlem Hellfighter on the front cover it pisses me off that they somehow included black people but the biggest contributor to the war is not represented.
And why?
Because "mah politics" .
>>344149029
They are everywhere. Even Overwatch has strong Muslim women who need no man.
>>344148704
>>344148704
What did they mean by this?
>>344148704
>where it's not needed
Anon
Video games aren't "needed"
>>344149184
>>344149029
you mad /pol/? get wreck white trash
>>344145296
> Valkyria Chronicles.jpg
>>344149080
>>344149080
>specially since most people are completely ignorant of WW1 and they'll actually believe DICE's shameless rewrite of history to be true
That's the plan
consider this article:
http://www.gamespot.com/articles/battlefield-1-ea-was-concerned-kids-didnt-know-ww1/1100-6440385/
They are aware that barely any Americans know about WW1, and are therefore trying to brainwash them into thinking it was different than it actually was
>>344149091
>Black people that represented less than 0,5%
Now who's making up numbers? What upsets you so much about black people that their portrayal (and yes, they were fighting in WW1) upsets you so much?
You and I both know they fought in WW1. I've shown you they were in Europe in large numbers. I've told you they fought in concentrated units. So why does it upset you? I hesitate to call you a racist because it couldn't be a simple matter of color, right?
>>344149029
>using a neo-Nazi wikipedia rip-off as a source
>>344145145
>He thinks niggers were part of the German force in Europe
>He thinks niggers were part of any WW1 force
Just because Americans had a unit of black men, doesn't mean black men were common or even present in WW1 battles.
Our nations BLACKED by immigrants
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=2&v=g6y_bNdcT9o
Our history BLACKED by SJWs
Just as well, when we've nothing to lose, there's nothing to stop us.
>>344149254
>They are aware that barely any Americans know about WW1
This is exactly why people are getting so mad about black people in this game. They literally know nothing about WW1.
>>344149258
Indians and Australians were fighting in the western scene
the amount of africans fighting in the western scene were below 2%
>>344149243
>>344149243
>racism is bad and intolerant you guis
>except when it's against FUCKING SUBHUMAN WHITE TRASH WE MUST EXTERMINATE ALL THE WHITES
Do you hear yourself speak? Kill yourself bolshevist SJW hypocrite
>>344149258
>large numbers
No.
>>344149184
Watchdogs 2, another stronk Muslim wymyn being a WE WUZ.
>>344149378
>Do you hear yourself speak?
Anon I know you're pretty crazy but you are aware that you are arguing with yourself, right? You're not actually quoting him, you made up some bullshit a strawman would say in your mind
>>344146198
>Curious, I didn't know the moral police visited Dice to tell them what was acceptable
Did you forget Anita's visit?
Maybe this game will help blacks realize that it was the jews who organized the slave trade to america, and that 90% of all slaver ships were jewish-owned
>>344149409
>large numbers
Yes.
Now please shut up.
>>344149004
Stop being so pedantic about the term 'allowed. Also,
>Catering to what the customers want is something every good business does
Yes this is true, but hanging on every word of focus groups is not good business practice. How does it make sense to include black people in the German army in a game about WW1?
Regardless of what the market research suggests, it is completely and utterly retarded to deviate from actual history because a bunch of babbys are whining about diversity. The amount of people that find it laughable that they decided to do this will vastly outweigh the SJWs.
But whatever, it's a small issue in the grand scheme of things, I'll still buy it as long as the gameplay is good.
>>344148963
Germany lost 2000k men in the war.
Russia lost 2250k men in the war.
France lost 1350k men in the war.
Austria lost 1000k men in the war.
What is 100k colonial troops (most of which died IN Africa and never imported to Europe, only Indians were shipped in meaningful numbers) compared to these numbers?
Putting in a little nod to colonial troops would've been fine. Making one of the British classes an Indian would've been fine. Even putting in an entire map taking place in Arabia or East Africa or something would've been fine. But making half the players models on the Western Front non-white, depicting niggers wearing German uniforms, this is just crossing the line into pandering blackwashing bullshit.
You can argue about the actual accuracy of it all day long, but at the end of the day it's very clear that the only purpose those fucking nigger were shoved in the game is to pander to the "progressive" crowd.
The fact that they included a woman bedouin warrior (the single most historically unrealistic thing imaginable) as a protagonist proves DICE's motives beyond doubt.
>>344149464
>>344149464
>Strawmans to hell and back
>Gets BTFO and called out on his hypocrite double standard and anti-white hatred
>Proceeds to samefag to defend his own post and spams even more ad hominem in response
Thanks for admitting defeat, now kys shitlib
>>344149489
>Shut up STOP DISAGREEING WITH ME
You're either a Tumblrite or a literal nigger, either way fuck off back to where you cam from.
>>344149080
>specially since most people are completely ignorant of WW1 and they'll actually believe DICE's shameless rewrite of history to be true
This is how all modern media is today, all of history is rewritten through a politically correct lens. In a decade or two white people will be a footnote in European history.
Why is there a triumphant black man on the cover with a burning german zeppelin going down in the background?
What were they even thinking? Jesus
>>344149558
British is playable
1/7 british WW1 deaths were colonial troops.
This is a significant portion. Shut up.
>>344149487
Who's worse? Westerners complaining about Jews or Turks complaining about Kurds?
I guess that Turks still try to remove Kurds at least.
>>344149732
And I conceded, putting in an Indian as one of the British models would've been fine.Try rereading my post, it's the universal niggerification and the fact the niggers are being pushed to the limelight what I have problems with.
>>344149723
Come on, Hans, you should know your history by now.
>>344149091
t. french
poor tripfag.
we are fine with the new game being innacurate about WW1, surrender is part of our culture.
it's an historic-fluid despiction.
also, WW1 & 2 were overused all over the century (see all those WW games, movies and the like since 1945, more than any another major event like vietnam/cold war for an US-proof example)
in this context, a game that refresh WW1 is good new.
>>344145145
nice strawman you limp wristed cuck
>>344149489
Kill yourself.
A minuscule fraction of those who served in the West is not a large portion just because your fee fees are pleased to think so.
>>344145540
It's only in alpha stage
