>1080p 144fps
>1440p 60fps
Which do you prefer?
The former
>>343142641
1080p 144fps
I actually prefer 720p 30fps.
The difference between 1080 and 1440 isn't as big as 144 and 60.
>>343142768
Cinematic. I love watching flicks, films, movies, talkies, and cinema like this. Anything else feels too real.
>>343142641
The higher the resolution the better but I hate anything above 50 fps. 60 feels very unnatural to me I personally like 40-45 fps
1440p at 144hz because I'm not poor.
Depends on the game
4k/30 for Cinematic games, most RPGs, most adventure games, most third person games, turn based games, strategy games, movie games, etc.
2k/60 for twitch FPS, twitch racers, most 2D/indie games, sports games, fighting games, shmups, rhythm games, precision platformers, etc.
>>343142641
it makes no difference to me
>>343142641
1080p 60fps
Majority of games made in the last decade don't even support shit above 60 fps without experiencing glitches. Why would I invest in a setup that will not only cause a glitchier game experience, but also needlessly demand excessive hardware for?
>inb4 poorfag
My rig is better than 96% of the world's gaming rigs, according to Steam. Just because I don't have a GTX 1080 and a 6700k doesn't mean it isn't more than fast enough for 1080p 144fps. I just don't give a fuck to waste power, generate excess heat, and kill my parts faster than I need to for what's ultimately unnecessary.
>>343142641
1080p 144fps
sent from my VG248QE
>>343143413
nice, i bought that monitor just the other day expecting it in the mail tomorrow. It's good eh?
>>343143215
>claims he isn't poor
>doesn't play in 4k
>>343143364
because you play on consoles where you have no other choice but to play at 1080p sub 30fps.
>>343142768
>not 900p at 24 fps for that true cinematic experience
>>343143538
I can't complain, but keep in mind once you go 144hz, there's no going back.
144 fps is more important, but you can do both 1440p and 144 fps now.
>>343143641
i also bought a 1070 so i should be good for a while
>>343143553
Most console games are 1080p/60 (or at least the game genres that actually benefit from it)
3440X1440 144fps
>>343142641
1080p 60 fps
>>343142641
the human eye can't perceive more than 30fps so it doesn't matter
>>343142641
>Shooter/Fighter
First option
>Everything else
Second option
/thread
1440p the difference in quality is amazing
>>343143413
Same monitor here
Not an Asus shill, I just adore it
1080p 144hz master race here
>>343143553
>Implying I play anything past the NES
>>343142641
Never played on a 144hz monitor. @60 is fine, higher ppi is clearly superior though
4k 60fps.
lowering a few settings from ultra to high is worth the 4x res from 1080
>>343142641
800p 24fps
>>343143641
>keep in mind once you go 144hz, there's no going back.
This, I wouldn't even mind playing games at 720p but I refuse to play games capped at even 60.
Yes I am that faggot.
what is a decent 1080p 120+hz monitor that doesn't cost like $400 which is literally the amount I need to upgrade my dumpster CPU + mobo to actually be able to use a monitor of the size?
>>343144051
Higher ppi above the 333 just fix the aliasing. There is no image quality improvements.
>>343142768
I understand where you're coming from but
>>343143828
then there's this faggot
>>343142641
4k @ 144fps
I afford it as a math major.
300k starting.
Frame rate is king to me. Even if you can't get all the way up to 140 even getting 30 or 40 frames more than usual is noticeable and cool for me. Just having the resolution bump doesn't seem worth it compared to having the game run like butter.
What's a good bang for my buck monitor?
>>343144770
>mfw I get paid 6 million just for studying Literature.
Get cucked Math retard.
>>343142641
1080p 60fps IPS monitor.
>>343142641
1440p 60fps
Sure anything higher up to like I think ~240fps is obviously going to be slightly better, but 60fps is fine if you want to settle for it. It is not choppy, but not the smoothest obviously. And in comparison, everything about 60FPS doesn't make it look choppy, it is just "less smooth."
1440p simply because less jaggies. It's the reason screenshots of games always look so good when they are downscaled or have tons of AA applied, no matter the other shit. If everything is sharp looking shit looks great. But when you play in-game and it doesn't look as perfect, because of the jaggies and lack of temporal AA when objects move.
>>343143545
is that a boy
>>343144620
benq xl2411z
>>343146414
It's a girl (boy)
Does that make sense?
>>343148952
gosh darn it
and yes ;^)
thanks anyway friendo
>>343142641
165hz is the new standard you mong
hehe good goy keep buying increased resolution displays for console games so you have to buy better GPU even though the results have diminishing returns
>>343143017
You sound like a fucking IDIOT.
>>343144159
>lowering a few settings from ultra to high is worth the 4x res from 1080
Truth
Is it better to play at 1080p but lower settings or lower resolution, but high/ultra settings?
>>343142641
1080p 60fps because poorfag
>buy 4k monitor
>everything is fucking tiny
>have to squint at everything
At the moment, I'll choose 144 fps. I'll upgrade to 4k in the future, but now is too early
>>343150615
render device: nvidia geforce gt 640
?
1440p 165Hz
>>343143368
I have two monitors. a 1440p one and a 1080p 144hz one.
I can't tell the difference between 60 and 144hz. I ended up using my 144hz monitor as a display for my consoles.
>>343151709
> $800 monitor
I'm okay with 1440, 60
144 would be a bitch to drive in a number of games.
I play at 19x12 and i always limit frames to 24fps. I'm a film buff and enjoy the cinematic experience
>>343152870
I have a $3000 PC what's another $800 to have the best possible monitor.
>>343153690
post speccy/guts
Neither. I prefer 1080p 60fps. Know how consoles look like ass to you now? Know how you used to enjoy a silky smooth 30fps but would settle for less as long as there was plenty of motion blur? Remember when 900p was good enough because of some retarded graph you saw in regards to how far away you need to be from a screen to reap the benefits of a higher resolution that has no sources? Now you're not satisfied with that, are you? Now these things bother you. That's why I'm waiting until it becomes bog-standard before I upgrade from 1080p or 60Hz.
I'm going to eat shit until I develop a taste for it.
My dream set-up would be to have a trio of 144hz 1080p monitors.
I feel like past 1080p resolution, it really stops to matter so much. But the difference between 60hz and 144hz is really eye-opening.
>>343142641
1440p 60fps
more is unneeded
>>343153690
Do you do extreme level video editing & programming or something?
I can't imagine there being any reason to spend so much on a computer unless you did something so far off the spectrum that you actually have to.
>>343148952
Miku is a girl and also the worst cinderella
personally don't actually notice any big difference above 60 FPS, so I'd settle for the higher resolution any day
>>343142641
I can achieve neither.
>>343156491
You wouldn't notice the difference if your monitor's only 60hz.
For anybody's that's actually used a 120/144hz monitor, the difference is actually enough to warrant never wanting to go back to 60hz.
>there are people in this thread that think 60fps is acceptable
It's the absolute minimum you fucking faggots
>>343156163
This desu
Keep those standards low until it is trivial to exceed them.
I bought a 120hz monitor. Not falling for that meme again
I'll take the higher resolution any day.
>>343143575
1080p at 12 fps is where it's at, pleb.
>>343157097
>120hz
>not 144hz
you outplayed yourself
>>343142641
why not both?
no reason to not get 1440p 144hz if you can afford it
>>343142641
PG278Q
Best monitor in existence. You IPS faggots don't know a fucking thing
>>343156430
No I just want to get high frames on a 1440p 165Hz monitor. 6700K, a GTX 1080, a couple SSDs and the other supporting hardware are expensive. I used to have a $5000 PC with dual 780Tis and a Hexacore CPU but this time I didn't want to spend as much money since I have a car hobby to waste money on as well.
>>343156749
id say 45 is the minimum desu
>>343157540
>doubling your framerate does nothing
>but suddenly adding 24 frames makes a huge differences
since when did the law of diminishing returns get backloaded?
>>343157731
PG279Q is the Superior IPS version
>>343142641
ahahaha kot got boner ;)
>>343142641
1440p 60fps.
But mostly since I don't actually play videogames
1080ppi and constant 60fps
For perfect for fighting games
>>343142641
well since we've all got 1080p displays that only support a 60hz refresh rate, it really doesnt matter now does it?
>>343142641
1440p at 144hz
>>343156749
Depends on the game
>>343142641
Both are out of my reach
>>343158847
not that guy but 144hz is better for 3d monitors. thats the only legitimate benefit i know of
I have a question. Does 1440p actually give you more screen area in video games or is everything just enlarged, so to speak?
I'm just finishing up my 2560×1080 build for The Witcher 3 since it gets me more a more panoramic view for immersion.
>>343160440
more screen more pixels more clarity but not by much.
>>343160136
3d doesn't work at 144hz, only 120. So, no.
1440p is better for 3d monitors, though.
>>343160556
It's odd because I get drastically more visible area for 2560x1080 and you'd think that'd the case for 2560×1440 as well....
Human brain cant process more than 30fps from each eye
>>343142948
>feels too real
Feels less real actually.
>>343142641
The former
>>343142641
1080p 144fpsonly in video games though
i tried watching the hobbit at 48fps and it didn't sit well with me at all.
>>343142641
144fps anyday
>>343156749
>it's the absolute minimum
Look at this aids faggot on display, WHEW, holy shit lad, hows it feel to shovel your parents money up your own asshole pretending that anything over 60 FPS is even noticeable?
>>343161787
thats because youre a bitch
and also there is no 48fps home release for the hobbit so that point is irrelevant
>>343142641
whichever is a more fun to play game
>>343142641
240x320 is all you need
>>343142641
>1080p 144fps
for multiplayer games and fps in gerneral.
>1440p 60fps
for singleplayer games like rpgs.
>>343157540
not a big difference
his monitor can probably run 144, benq ones come with 120hz and a 144hz option.
>>343142641
>XB270HU
144hz, 1440p
Not compromising.
>>343143017
There is literally no way to justify this
>>343156749
It does depend on the genre. And good games can have abysmal framerates.
>>343142641
Depends on if the game is first person or not.
If it is, framerate is king. If not, 60 is acceptable.
>>343142641720p 45fps
>>343143870
>implying
name one fighting game that runs at 144.
>>343150097
Bump
Someone has to know this answer.
>>343161787
That's because The Hobbit's CGI sucks and is really obvious at 24fps, nevermind 48fps.
>>343142641
Currently using 1080p/144hz. I mostly have been playing racing games and Overwatch...so that helps.
It's all situational. If you aren't playing competitive online games--especially shooters and racing titles--go for the prettier resolution.
>>343142641
Numbers don't lie
2560px*1440px*60Hz = 221.2 Megapixels/second
1920px*1080px*144Hz = 298.6 Megapixels/second
