>4k 60fps
>over 6 teraflops
>$399
how do we stop microsoft from taking over the console industry?
>>343135932
>399
Probably 599
>>343135932
We don't
I'm now a #Microsoftmissile
>>343135932
It could send a man to the moon via teleportation (which would be awesome mind you) but I want a system with some good exclusive games. (or gives me a BJ everytime I turn it on, y'know whatever)
>>343136030
If it released then year then yea.
The price depreciates after a year.
>>343135932
>>4k 60fps
"4k video" means Youtube. Games won't change.
How the hell is it possible to play at 60fps, 4k at 599?
More like 30fps at 1440p.
Not even the 1080 can maintain 60fps straight in 4k
>>343136325
You think you can't play something like ori at 4k? Or a game like mgs v at 4k keeping the same graphics? Those are the games that will easily run 4k and MS can say so
But recent modern games won't run.
PC users can run shit easily at 4k if it's a dated "artistic" game. It's the new stuff that requires a lot of power
Phil said devs can do 1080p and push graphics if they want. So that's what they will do.
Teraflops is such a vague buzzword.
You cant determine the performance of the console just by saying it has siz Teraflops
>4k 60fps
>5.9tflops
playing tetris there buddy?
>>343136578
It's probably not gonna run anything modern, 4k at 60fps though. No way. If they did that at 599, heck I might consider buying a console.
Though I do agree all the indie stuff should be easy to run.
>>343136589
Consoles are all about buzz words
Last time it was GDDR5 ram
