So what are the other classes gonna be?
>nignog
that is so fucking silly to me
>>343091963
hol up
Video from other thread?
Black people are superior physically. Whoever enlisted the most black people in a war wins.
>>343091963
>mfw german army will have a black guy and people will defend this shit
>>343091551
Like this.
>>343091551
assault, medic, support
![obamaturban[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/vtReIg2.jpg "obamaturban[1].jpg")
>>343092208
Is that Obongo in pic 2?
>>343091551
Okay, now this being a little daft.
>>343092208
That 4th guy looks like he has a settlement that needs your help
>>343091551
ridiculous, i fucking hate swedes, they fucking deserved to be raped by mudslimes and niggers
>>343092152
>mfw german army will have a black guy and germans will defend this shit
>>343092501
WUZ
>>343091551
Hopefully one that isn't a nigger.
Can you choose race in this game? I want to play as white or black
>>343092572
KANGZ
>>343092862
I don't want*
>>343092406
fuck.
>>343092862
No, you have to play a black, that's the only option
>>343092208
Well it's not far off in the way that they had regiments for their colonies also, but the way they incorporated it is fucking terrible. Here we have the Zimbwabzulu soldier, the Designated Curry soldier, the... I don't even know what he's going for, and the Hol Up King soldier.
>a bullet is now a gadget
rofl
>>343091551
This game spits in the face of those who suffered in The Great War.
Fucking Swedish cunts, fucking raze them.
>>343093128
we wuz gadgets n sheet
>>343093081
But that makes no sense
>>343093190
uhhhhhh only black people fought in world war 1 and the revolutionary war. you b igto!!! white cis scum!!!!!!!!
>"This flare gun shoots projectiles which reveal enemies in their vicinity."
...that's not what flare guns are used for.
>Soldiers from completely different parts of Europe with completely different cultures, customs, languages, history, and heritage aren't multicult enough for DICE.
How can people go to more schooling after high school and still be so god damn uneducated?
>People will buy this garbage
>>343093375
Everyone is convinced that white people don't have distinct cultures because we have already won the culture war.
What's the point in making a WW1 game if everyone is gonna have automatic weapons?
>>343093375
Because higher education has a crippling leftist bias, especially in history. Imagine, we could have gotten Austro-Hungarian Galician units, we could have gotten German Silesians and Prussians, we could have zouaves of France and their distinctive Moroccans, but no, the multi kult has to be obnoxious, revisionist, and entirely unnecessary
>>343093375
>yfn you realize it's not about diversity, it's just anti-white and anti-Western
>>343093641
It took you this long?
>>343093375
Didn't you get the memo? White people have no culture
>>343091551
>>343091963
Bracing for the shills EA hired to defend this game.
>>343093641
I've always realized that, really. I just don't understand how you can be so ignorant of countries you can literally take a bus to at any time.
>>343093375
Because we fucking won the culture war.
This is the case of people that lost trying to win a war that is already over, and the cucks that are trying to help them for god knows what reason.
>>343091551
WE WUZ KRAUTS
>>343093375
>make a Battlefield game full of white people
>have to spend money on marketing
>make a Battlefield game with nigs in it
>/pol/ throws a shitfit and markets the game for free
They're pretty well educated in business. I've never seen so many /v/ threads about a CoD or Battlefield game pre-launch.
wtf is up with all these nignogs? Are Dice and EA genuenly trolling us or are they retarded? They must realise that the colonial troops were not that common on the western front ESPECIALLY german colonial troops considering they had their fucking hands full in AFRICA.
>>343093865
they seem to be missing this thread, not payed enough, I guess. They really need to fuck off already.
Why don't they just make a game of 100% black people if they want it to be diverse? You know since their definition of diverse is "nigger it up".
>>343092150
Germany enlisted the most and lost. America didn't let blacks enlist because they were considered unfit for combat and discipline training, only a small amount were in and took roles that were too dangerous for women but too unimportant for fighting-fit men to be distracted with.
Can't wait for the Austro-Hungarian black soldiers.
Their colonial empire was massive! Oh, wait.
>>343094278
There's like 3-5 of them that all come together in a wave at once. Probably in a group.
If they're actually at EA hq it's possible they're literally on their lunch break right now lel
>>343094492
Germany certainly did not enlist the most, that'd easily go to France, Germany just used their black local troops highly efficiently in the campaigns in colonial Africa, I mean the local German commander is universally hailed as the greatest guerilla commander of all time.
>>343093443
>not cottonfield
So close.
>France isn't in the game they said
>You can play as a US black regiment that was given to the French
>That were ordered by the French
>And used French Equipment
I will never not be pissed at this
looks like a battlefront ripoff.
>>343094686
>cottonfield 1
>>343094686
What, you can't actually expect people to put the minimum amount of thought of effort into their shitposting?
>>343095431
>making fun of niggers niggers niggers niggers is now considered shitposting
Hi, Tumblr. Are you staying or visiting you fat tub of crap?
>>343095063
From what is this character from again?
Can you change your soldiers race?
>>343096306
ill save you some time
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/551022
>>343092208
>colony troops don't count because they're not white even though its historically accurate
>>343095431
Here come the shills. Go back to your neo hippie liberal website you cock sucker
>WWI
>automatic rifles everywhere
>niggers and sandniggers everywhere
>most likely vehicles too
ebin
>>343092862
>>343093081
I highly doubt it'll be like that at release. If the ability to change is the only thing keeping the game from being shown at E3, then they're going to send it out.
>>343096552
>4 guys were white in this army of 6,000,000,000,000,000,000 guys lets switch those numbers around shall we ;)
>WW1 game
>no France or Russia
>germans, americans and australians are blacks
>no funky mustaches and beards
>no trenches
>no pikehelms
>>343096410
Yes.
>>343096536
Ah yes, that's it.
Thanks.
>>343096552
Oh shit
>12:32 in California
>a minute or so to clock in after lunch then check 4chan for the thread, another minute to respond to the first post talking about race
>>343094613
was right
Will probably buy for $20 in a CD key site.
>>343096552
Have all white west front and black / indian colony troops on africa maps?
No, lets have 3/4 black in all maps :)
>>343097173
There aren't other maps though
>Implying you can even tell the color of a skin in game when the thing is running on that bullshit Frostbyte engine
>>343097292
At least they are not all covered in oil like DA:I
>>343097518
nigger lover
>>343095431
die
>>343096984
They're not making a WW1 game.
They're making another battlefield with a WW1 theme.
>>343097590
fat virgin
>>343091551
Ahh yes, the classic european great war combatant, a nigger from the southern united states
Are DICE even trying to hide their political motives anymore?
>>343097776
Now you get it.
DICE has gotten away with making a WWI game with an american dude in the cover.
Since he's a nigger, nobody is calling them out on that, they are just using all of you and SJWs to distract everyone from that fact.
That, and taking advantage from the fact that little kids think WWI was pretty much WWII 0.5
>>343096984
>no funky mustaches and beards
Fucking, this is what I was missing.
At least they better not fuck it up even more by making them say 'OH DAYMN SON' or other bullshit ghetto shit like that.
>australians
Fuck this game, and fuck Forza Horizon 3.
>>343092208
The British will mostly play british and they need characters to self-insert.
I have an equal lack of respect for anyone getting butthurt over shoehorned nigs and anyone even considering buying this game. EA/DICE are cucks to the highest degree but that's the least of all reasons to hate them.
>>343098081
Bet you 50$ there will be something like that.
>>343098221
I'm only butthurt over the presence of Australians.
>>343092208
At least put on historically correct uniforms that the nig-nogs wore. They are disrespecting the uniform.
>>343097776
>Are DICE even trying to hide their political motives anymore?
Actually no, they explicitly stated they did it for diversity's sake.
"That’s the thing. People don’t know that this was the case. We want to show diversity in the game. That’s been a key goal. You can see in the trailer that there’s a Bedouin woman warrior on a horse. She’s a playable character in the single-player campaign."
http://venturebeat.com/2016/05/06/ea-dices-lead-designer-answers-our-questions-about-battlefield-1/
This wasn't the source I originally read it at, but what ever. Perhaps someone else will link it.
>>343092208
Where's the Jew?
Youtube seems to have noticed it as well
>>343098543
*Here's some more marketing speech to cleverly avoid the issue:
"GamesBeat: When things started leaking a bit, people were positioning this as an alternate history of World War One. Is there any alternate history to this, or is it purely historical?
Berlin: It’s definitely rooted in history. There’s no alternate mix of anything else. All the stuff you see is equipment that was available. All the vehicles you see were available at this time."
>>343091551
Isn't this just the character customization screen for multi-player? I'm sure the case here is that you can mix and match character models with different gear.
I know some in this thread are here just to shitpost, but this is getting old.
>>343098787
>white soldiers DLC
>>343098787
People are getting really tired of PC bullshit being shoved down their throat.
A female or minority protagonist in a single player game, whatever.
Rewriting history though? That's stupid.
Oh dear lord I just realized the next Assassins creed is set in Egypt
>game comes out
>A portion of the community make a clan in BF1 called "Historically Accurate"
>They only play white characters on any side and never use automatic rifles
>They prioritize nignog and mudskin player characters at all times
>DICE bans them
Well I bet it won't take long until some straw grasping SJW faggots start to bitch how you only shoot black people in this game
>>343099478
Ubisoft shoved a couple of trannies into Victorian London for no reason, so expect it to be "WE WUZ KANGS" with pretty much every single character black as fuck.
>>343099478
>Oh dear lord I just realized the next Assassins creed is set in Egypt
How is that PC pandering when you played as an Arab in the Hashashin in AC1?
>>343099640
>couple of trannies into Victorian London for no reason
Were they crossdressers? Because those sure were there and have been around big towns since fucking Rome.
>>343091551
The best will be Austro-Hungarian Asian charakters.
A country which literally didng go anwhere and where multiculturalism meant different religion you dont even see.
They just have to fucking put niggers everywhere. I live in the westernmost region of Canada and all my life growing up I saw maybe 3 niggers. In the past 2 years I've seen more niggers than in my entire previous 23 years of life.
>>343099748
They called them female, had the description of them be female, female hair styles and so on but they had a male name and a broken voice that you'd expect from a tranny.
>>343099720
Because the region that took place in actually was lots of arabs, and they got the skin tones right and everything.
Egypt, which back then would consist of northern african colored people (which essentially look closer to arabs than central africans), will be depicted as central africans, which is completely wrong.
>>343100073
So?
>They add Russia in DLC
>Nicholas II is Black
WE WUZ CZARS
>>343099640
Good, don't give a shit about this franchise, but I love seeing /pol/ mad as fuck.
Look at this thread, only one video and all of them bleeding out of their anuses, lovely.
>>343099640
They were crossdressers, and not only those existed for a long time, but AC4 had one of the main characters be one of those crossdressers.
Difference being that she was a girl who dressed as a man.
>>343097173
>>343096842
Race is chooseable in game.
Not static.
>>343098787
Which video is this from?
The fact they showed niggers in the gameplay was really stupid, they should just leave them as custom skins so blacks can feel immersed in the game. (I don't think battlefield ever tried to be historically accurate)
>>343101287
>I don't think battlefield ever tried to be historically accurate
>"It’s definitely rooted in history. There’s no alternate mix of anything else."
>>343101247
I'm interested too
>>343101287
>(I don't think battlefield ever tried to be historically accurate)
It did to an extent of giving each faction what was available to them and representing them right.
Having this many black people as part of Kraut or other European armies on European frontlines is the equivalent of the entire German army just using flamethrowers.
Would it have been possible? In some strange dimension yes? Would it be historically accurate? Fuck no. And that has more gameplay variety / diversity as an option in a game than having nignogs overpresented.
>>343098787Another settlement needs your help.
>>343098787
>>343099478
>niggers
>goy
>zim zam
>putin profile pic
>buying gf profile pic
Yep, sounds like it's just your average person complaning
>>343101615
Every developer that has a game take place in a setting mildly related to a historical event says that, it means nothing in reality.
>>343094240
>/pol/ is the only people capable of expressing resentment at a lazily executed, shoe-horned diversity self stroke under the guise of 'historical accuracy'... when they can't even replicate the fronts these groups fought in.
>>343102959
>>/pol/ is the only people capable of expressing resentment at a lazily executed, shoe-horned diversity self stroke under the guise of 'historical accuracy'... when they can't even replicate the fronts these groups fought in.
See >>343102638
>>343091551
Spearchucker, Witch Doctor and Cotton Picker.
>>343102829
Sure, right after they said:
>We want to show diversity in the game. That’s been a key goal
>>343103281
Okay? My point is that they weren't aiming for historical accuracy, how does that disprove that?
whites actually revised history when they won. black people did all the work
>>343103513
>Anon says 'I don't think battlefield ever tried to be historically accurate'
>I prove the developers said it's rooted in history
>next up they say diversity has been a key goal
>You say developers obviously lie(?)
Which was the point, I guess we agreed from the start then. They're lying while pushing an agenda.
I don't care if there are black people are in WWI (blacks from colonies), but treating them as if they had a dominant role in the war is wrong and it's a good example of history revisionism
>>343103513
dices devs straight up said they wanted to be as close to historically accurate while preserving the gameplay and battlefield mechanics.
Then we have in any given gameplay vid that half or more of the troops running around are black or some other minority. sounds retarded to me
>>343103094
So what? That doesn't mean that your average person's annoyance with their blatant laziness to the historical context of WW1 is unfounded.
>>343103094
>>343102638
>only /pol/ calls blacks niggers
>only /pol/ makes Jew jokes
>only /pol/ pays attention to the Trayvon Martin case and shared its memes all over
>only /pol/ likes Putin?
>only /pol/ plays Runescape
You're probably right about some of those, but I don't think you realize how deep this shit has gone.
My dad calls niggers "dindus" now, and has no idea what 4chan is.
Co-worker says "top kek" all the time and also has no idea what 4chan is.
>>343101247
>>343101625
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fIyufRnIci0
obvious /pol/ raid
>>343103892
>they're lying
Yes.
>to push an agenda
No.
>>343104206
Again they *said* they wanted to be historically accurate, but they didn't. What are they gonna say? "No, this is a WWI game that isn't trying to be historically accurate."?
>>343104275
If when the final game comes out you're forced as a darkie more than 20% of the time, then yes, I'll agree with you. Right now, no.
>>343104524
I'm not saying /pol/ is the only that does any of those, but your average person doesn't call blacks niggers, doesn't make jew jokes in relation to white genocide, and didn't share trayvon memes. The runescape (although it's the buying gf that matters) and putin are fine on their own, but in relation, they're usually used by white nationalists or /r9k/, which is basically /pol/.
Odds are, they do browse 4chan. You have no idea how many seemingly normal people actually do.
>We will never get a slow paced WWI FPS where each game takes about 45 minutes
>>343105056
>Verdun
>>343104851
>average person doesn't do things
>the average people you mentioned might do said things
Dude, what?
I'm just assuming you're a marketer, because this thread got derailed into MUH RACISM
>France DLC
>autos/semi autos on 75% of the classes
>vehicles moving like modern vehicles
>nothing new or interesting added to the series
>EA
Flooding the game with niggers is the LEAST of this game's problems, and the fact that there are people defending an EA reskin is suspicious as fuck, and it always boils down to...
>go back to /pol/ ur racis
>the game is SUPPOSED to be nothing like WWI
>go play arma
It's like the same script, every thread to defend garbage.
>>343104851
>they're lying
>Yes.
>to push an agenda
>No.
Very compelling arguments. As with:
>Again they *said* they wanted to be historically accurate, but they didn't
You seem to pick and choose what they say is truth and what isn't. So according to you they lied about it being historically accurate? Yet totally seem to dismiss the fact they said:
>"We want to show diversity in the game. That’s been a key goal."
So which statement made by the developer according to you is truth and which is false? You've clearly now stated they don't have an agenda. Yet you admit they lie.
>>343105259
Oh shit, I forgot that game existed.
How is it?
>>343105379
>>average person doesn't do things
>>the average people you mentioned might do said things
>Dude, what?
>I'm just assuming you're a marketer, because this thread got derailed into MUH RACISM
What?
>Flooding the game with niggers is the LEAST of this game's problems, and the fact that there are people defending an EA reskin is suspicious as fuck, and it always boils down to...
I'm not defending an EA reskin, I'm saying it's stupid to get worked up over something as simple as that.
>>343105382
Developers can lie about one thing, and not about another. Again, they're not going to say they don't care about historical accuracy in a WWI game because then there wouldn't even be a point in it being a WWI game. I'm sure they included historical elements, but I highly doubt that they went out of their way (and by that, I mean something that would require a significant amount of labor) to maintain historical accuracy.
Let me rephrase. They are pushing an agenda. They're agenda is to make money.
>>343092208
they did have a wide range of fighters
but they didn't all look identical except for what hats they wore
fucking dice is the most incompetent group in history, EA execs were right, they should have just made BF 2143
>>343103513
except they literally said that.
>>343106842
>Developers can lie about one thing, and not about another
Sure, and we will have to deduce what is bullshit and what isn't, so far I think it's fairly obvious what is going on, then again you have a couple of contrarians or marketers trying to prove you otherwise. So if you defend one thing they say, yet deny another and say 'all developers lie' I'll just dismiss it. Just say what everyone is thinking; everything they say is a lie.
>They are pushing an agenda. They're agenda is to make money
And you don't think that agenda includes racial quotas? Is that so far fetched? Because it seemed like that a couple of comments ago. Even though (I assume you're the same person at the top of the reply chain) you said:
>The fact they showed niggers in the gameplay was really stupid, they should just leave them as custom skins so blacks can feel immersed in the game. (I don't think battlefield ever tried to be historically accurate)
>>343107687
>**So if you defend one thing they say, yet deny another
What I meant by this was statements by the developers that contradicts themselves.
>>343107684
Read any of my other posts
>>343107687
I'm just saying that that one particular statement is fabricated. Just the one. I think it's perfectly reasonable for a developer to make one false statement.
>And you don't think that agenda includes racial quotas? Is that so far fetched? Because it seemed like that a couple of comments ago. Even though (I assume you're the same person at the top of the reply chain) you said:
Of course they had racial quotas. To make money. Not because the jews are trying to brainwash the youth, or because Dice supports white genocide, it's just to make money. (Although that person isn't me, I could see how you could make that assumption)
>>343091551
KANGZ
>>343108489
>I'm just saying that that one particular statement is fabricated
Which one? You said they're lying but never specified which statement you were talking about. I'll give you the highlights of what we're talking about:
>It’s definitely rooted in history. There’s no alternate mix of anything else.
or:
>We want to show diversity in the game.
And then you said this:
>Not because the jews are trying to brainwash the youth, or because Dice supports white genocide, it's just to make money
You what? I'm confused, I never once implied that. Maybe the other poster mentioned something like that, I'll have to check.
>>343109182
>Which one? You said they're lying but never specified which statement you were talking about.
I'm sorry, I think I did in a different chain.
>It’s definitely rooted in history. There’s no alternate mix of anything else.
This is the one I think is a lie. They would have never mentioned historical accuracy had the interviewer not asked whether it was historically accurate or in an alternate WWI.
>You what? I'm confused, I never once implied that. Maybe the other poster mentioned something like that, I'll have to check.
Throughout this thread and in comments on YouTube and other places.
>>343109485
So then:
>>We want to show diversity in the game
is the true statement by them?
Which >>343104851
>they're lying
Yes.
>to push an agenda
No.
Said they weren't.
>and in comments on YouTube and other places.
>Youtube
W-what the fuck, I'm seriously not sure what I'm reading anymore. Perhaps I've had too much to drink. Please sage this thread as I've been doing, for the greater good.
>>343105421
Not that anon, but I got Verdun on sale a few days ago.
I really like it so far
>only white people fought in WW1
>>343111247
>French were absent in a war inside their own country
>Blacks serving for the Krauts on the Western Front
>Half of the British forces were black, one quarter was white and the other quarter was Indian (dot)
(((you)))
>>343111247
But where were they located, anon?
