So we can all agree that Path of Radiance was the best Fire Emblem game?
I'll never get the obession with this series, this games story is okay for an FE game but the series as a whole is just gutter trash compared to other SRPGs, and yet this franchise is the only one in the entire genre that regularly gets discussed, it doesn't make sense.
>>343032305
Nobut I, for one, can
>incredibly easy even on hard
>bland boring characters, but that's every FE game
>story not being about a prince doesn't make it good
>if you equip a skill, then realize it is better suited on someone else, too bad, you lose it when you unequip it
FE isn't even a good series.
>>343033170
Nintendrones
>>343032305
I like Radiant Dawn a bit more
Game was way easy and drags towards the end.
Also, I found it a bit weird that they went with the whole "you shouldn't rule just because you have royal blood" thing and then just sat Elincia on the throne at the end. The anti-monarchy theme also goes against pretty much every other game in the series.
>Soren will never be in Smash Bros
feels bad chow mein
>>343032305
Every time I read PoR shilling it just makes me not want to ever play Awakening or Fates and reinforces the idea that I should never get a 3DS.
I didn't enjoy some of the OP maps the developers put in.
Awakening with its Children mechanic fit so well the time travelling concept.
Either awakening for it's children or Shadow Dragon coz story.
>>343032305
12>14C>9=7>10=6=8=14R>13=5=4=14H>11>bad/dated game zone>1=2=3
Objectively correct list
>>343032305
>Babbys 2nd fire emblem
No.Only reason it's not Babby's 1st fire emblem is because that title belongs to FE7.
