>>342621467
Undertale easily
Any game on a PC
>>342621686
Right so undertale
Undertale (2015) by Toby Fox
>>342621467
The Order: 1886
Uncharted 4: A Thief's End
Bloodborne
>>342621909
Don't forget undertale
>>342622052
Not on PS4 so it's dogshit, sorry.
>>342621909
>Bloodborne
>Best looking
>Even good looking
m8, please
>>342621856
Undertale has bad graphics. Stop posting cancerous maymays
Hard to since everything kind of looks the same these days graphically. Just put Fallout 4 next to the new Watchdogs.
not arma 3.
battlefront
>>342622641
Don't forget undertale
>>342622357
lol ps4 can't run an 8 bit atari game lol. for the fedoras.
>>342622664
Someone hasn't seen the new update.
Also.. from a technical standpoint arma is way more impressive.. just look at the lighting and weather.
>>342622845
>from a technical standpoint arma is way more impressive
Is arma even using PBS? Pretty sure it isn't, not sure if the APEX update changed anything about that yet.
The draw distance is an obv advantage in arma since you can crank it up to million while in any other game its very limited, esp battlefront but that's about it
>>342622845
yeah just look at the way the terrain constantly deforms right in front of you while you're at it and the way the ground looks like it's suffering graphical seizures. i'm also a fan of the way objects will appear to be floating in mid-air from a distance.
modded skyrim
>>342623195
Also modded undertale
Right now the Top 5 belongs to Arma 3, The Witcher 3, Battlefront, Crysis 3 and UT4.
Absolutely special and unique award goes to Fallout 4 WITH mods, and we're talking about 8K textures and 4k sprite effects, because FO4 unmodded looks like complete ass.
Expect the Special Edition of Skyrim to reach these levels of graphical awesomeness thanks to the new 64bit structure and the new engine updates.
>>342623463
Replace arma with undertale
Battlefront
Uncharted 4
crisis 3
Arma is pretty unimpressive from a visual standpoint.
>>342621467
quality thread
There's a difference to be made between games that excel in prerendered things like having prerendered backgrounds or baked GI and games that excel in having everything/most things be real time. Some people consider games with photorealistic prerendered backgrounds to be the best looking games but others see this as cheating.
At the moment, I'd say that uncharted 4's home scenes are probably the most impressive using baked lighting
>>342623838
>Arma is pretty unimpressive from a visual standpoint.
arma 3 is photorealistic
>>342623709
Fuck off
What is your obsession with Undertale? All sorts of games get on PC, and some of them are obviously going to look worse. There are still text adventures being made on the PC in 2016, and the world is better off with them. What about this do you not understand? That individual games can vary in quality in how they look as a result of factors outside the fucking platform? The existence of these does not diminish the good-looking games.
>>342623981
You are entitled to your opinion, but I disagree.
>>342624162
>>342624108
don't get too riled up. Don't want to overwork your heart more than you already are
>>342624340
nice photoshop faggot
Crysis
Minecraft
Undertale
>>342624340
>>342624402
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MGyaR2sSBkA
>>342624340
The most impressive part of this is that it runs at a stable 60fps on consoles.
How the fuck is that possible...
>>342621467
Crysis 1. NOT 3. The first one is still the best looking game ever made.
>>342624232
How to make a game look """"""photorealistic"""""": Base it on vapid wide open areas with very little features and make sure you don't walk too close to any of the buildings or shrubbery
>>342624340
>>342624625
so graphics>gameplay now?
man history really does repeat itself
>>342621909
>Bloodborne
you mean jaggy jaggy simulator 2015?
>>342622492
My ps4 hasnt been connected to online, so i dont k ow if there are any patches that fix the way it looks. It literally looks like shit.
>>342624232
>that obvious aliasing on the railing
>whatever the FUCK is going on with the hill to the far left
Hahahahaha.
>>342624740
>implying
come on
>>342624720
Funny when you consider how terribly that game has aged and even mediocre console games look better today.
>>342624778
Subject of the thread is "Whats the best looking video game out there?"
You're literally the only one in the thread talking about gameplay.
Retard.
>>342624232
Is that CoD4?
>>342624889
Crysis 1 is ACTUALLY photorealistic. Just look up "crysis vs real life".
I still think Rising Storm is the best looking fps I've played given the gameplay scale and complexity.
>>342621909
You forgot
>Rise of the Tomb Raider
>Tomb Raider 2013
>>342624720
Crysis was good for 2007 but it looks worse even than console games these days.
>>342624942
then how come half the posts are saying how good undertale looks
>>342625203
Nice bait
>>342625203
back to lurking faggot
>>342625029
""""""Photorealistic""""""" or not, the tech running it is antediluvian at best. It looks VERY dated going back to it now.
>>342624625
That is what you get when you focus on art style and level design over raw graphics and useless performance hungry features.
Instead of waste resources on chest hair physics like uncharted 4 does they focused on making a good looking game that runs smoothly.
>>342622492
>>342624834
bloodbornes artstyle and scenery are so good that it negates any technical issues it has
>>342624625
DICE is pretty GOAT when it comes to technical performance. EA is the one fucking up their games with DLC bullshit
>>342621467
Why would you post a picture of arma 3 lmao
>>342625730
Nah anon, you can't post this just after we posted several pics of Battlefront.
I'm sorry, have a webm instead.
>>342625730
>>342625819
Is this still going to be using UE3 or have to moved to UE4?
>>342623981
Sure it's photorealistic but it doesn't look good enough to be in a top 5
>>342625352
Maybe if you're on the same computer.
It's actually indistinguishable from real life.
>>342624778
>so graphics>gameplay now?
Well yeah...it's a graphics thread anon.
>>342626132
>>342626132
I sure hate it that real life has tiling ground textures and blurry distance textures.
>>342625932
UE3 but they've really pushed the engine far. The models are honestly what matter more and Rising Storm balances performance, detail, and scale really well. Its a game that is demanding maxed out but it earns that performance requirement
UE4 is all about effects but the modeling and lighting aren't that much better given how much more demanding it is
>>342623463
Nothing about your screenshot looks even remotely good.
It's just a blinding vaseline filter.
:^)
>>342626725
i never said it that screen was meant to show anything, you faggot
>>342624612
I don't think you can argue that modded battlefront isn't the best looking game out at the moment, despite how mediocre the game may be.
Arkham Knight and Unity. How come all the great looking games feel mediocre as fuck?
>>342627036
Why the fuck are you shilling how good F03 looks and then post a horrible low quality picture of FO3
It's not my fault you're a retard.
arma looks nice until you pay attention to the terrain and rubble piles and a whole bunch of other shit. new lighting is nice though.
>>342625926
Bettlefront has a vastly larger budget though. I have to admit though that it by far is the prettiest fps yet released
Battlefront is literally more graphically detailed but Rising Storm's maps still look great in my opinion. I think its the prettiest large scale UE3 game by miles
>>342624340
Battlefront is the pinnacle of grafix and runs pretty damn well. Games should just stop here and offer more massive environments and enemy counts, instead of trying to beat it by inches.
>>342627228
>new lighting is nice
https://forums.bistudio.com/topic/185055-wip-terrain-x-cam-taunus/page-21#entry3032720
>arma 3
>good
maybe in screenshots, but the shit optimization means that you need to turn down any cpu intensive settings in order to keep the game playable in multiplayer
>>342627572
Arma is pretty optimized if you are playing single player or just coop missions with friends.
You start seeing frame drops in multiplayer because the server dictates everyone's fps. If the server you are playing on is not 60 then no one is getting 60
>>342625050
Almost looks as neat as undertale
>>342627572
>>342627740
Arma benefits from better servers with high coreclock and ssd. Virtual servers and server with more cpu cores but lower clock will run terrible.
The serversoftware is also just using 2 cores if I remember correctly.
>>342625783
That's not either's fault. I blame the gamers on this one. People want insane levels of details which require insane amounts of time and resources to create. People are asking for too much and EA are giving the dev team too little time to do it.
They made all of that content in only 2 years? when graphics weren't as high they could easily pull off double the levels but now the fidelity requirements are eating into development time
Just look how each level looks completely different. They all require the creation of different assets. The graphics are at the point where they are ruining the games by limiting content
>>342627432
I agree with the environment size being larger but the complexity needs to also improve. When I play Red Orchestra 2, every tree, rock, hill, wall, building, etc; are vital parts of the gameplay. When I look at Battlefront I see tons of detail but the levels are almost empty.
Everything you can hide behind in Red Orchestra and Rising Storm is vital. There is almost nothing to hide behind in Battlefront but walls and large rocks
