https://youtu.be/933LBq34y8I
>"So that may or may not have been Overwatch at 4K at max settings"
Where were you when NoVideo was kill?
>>342469098
I plan on getting the 480 but
>Overwatch at 4k
Is nothing
>>342469098
4k is 4096x2160
4k IS NOT 2160x1440p
4k at max settings would be rendering the game at 8192x4320
>>342469784
>2160
2560*
>>342469098
Why do you write you 9's like g's?
>>342469784
>>342469862
Buy me Marie's game.
>>342469098
I am excited for that card, but good lord does that guy suck at games.
>>342469980
Shit taste. Honoka is superior
>>342470108
Honkers is just thick Marie.
Ok would 4K make shit games better?
Anyone got experience on this?
i can run Overwatch in 3800xwadever on my fucking 960
what is this thread
>>342469709
Overwatch is decently demanding
>>342469784
>4k is 4096x2160
Give it up, the difference between cinema standards and panel standards is dead now because normies got marketed early on with the wrong term.
The rx480 can do 4k pretty well? Day one buy.
I can run 95% of games at max at 2560x1440 on my 7950. No one cares about performance on anything less than 4k.
>>342470435
If you're playing a game that a 750Ti can max, yes.
I'm pretty sure even ps4 could play overwatch maxed at 4k, since it's so god damn ugly and designed to run on asian computers from the early 00s.
>>342470506
>I can run 95% of games at max at 2560x1440 on my 7950
There's no point in lying when 10 seconds in google can show you 50,000 benchmarks that reveal how much you're lying.
>mfw Intel HD Graphics master race and no high-performance computer games worth playing have come out in 10+ years
Keep giving the jews shekels, PCucks.
>>342470358
>overwatch is decently demanding
You can run it on high at solid 60 fps on a 560 ti
>>342470723Not on a 635
>>342470307
On Epic settings ?
>>342470707
>use useless kiketel cpu's integrated graphics
>keep giving the jews shekels
>>342470358
About as demanding as tf2 and lol.
>>342469784
>4k is 4096x2160
ok
>4k IS NOT 2160x1440p
ok, how is relevant? pb279q is a UHD-1 monitor with a max resolution of 3840 x 2160, which is usually referred as 4k due to marketing
>4k at max settings would be rendering the game at 8192x4320
Nobody is talking about rendering scale when refer to "max settings". It's like bringing resolution into the "max settings" - that's not how it works
>>342470847
Literally wrong.
>>342470831
It came with my laptop, nerd.
>>342470894
>laptop
>keep giving the jews shekels
>>342470883
Considering blizzard designed it with those 2 game's players as the primary market, it wouldn't have made sense if it wasn't ugly as shit and didn't run like cheetah on every piece of shit computer in the world. My computer is 3 years old and I still maxed it out at 2560x1440 144fps with no frame drops.
>sped up gameplay to hide the framerate
sure told nvidia
>>342470847
So what you're saying is the rX 480 is a Pajeet card for poorfag BRs and slavs that want to play esports cancer?
>>342470707
>lol i don't need a graphics card anyway
who are you trying to fool lol
>>342471093
I've had enough of this fucking retarded board.
Fucking die.
>>342471139
Pretty fucking much, or scrublords who stick to low-demand f2p shit where nothing you do really matters but the game pats you on the ass for winning anyway.
>>342471357
Intel GMAfag detected.
>>342470587
I never said maxed out retard. I have to turn the AA down to 4x or some games off (like Witcher 3). Don't be a retard.
>>342470420
>3840x2160 is marketed as the hot new 4K thing
I bet in a few years we'll be getting 4096x2160 displays that'll be marketed as "true 4K for high-end users and enthusiasts"
Please do the needful and buy an AMD GPU. You can trust me because I am just an ordinary Indian dalit who is excited about the affordable price of the RX 480.
>>342469098
If AMD cards are so good then why do you see so many AMD users in the Steam hubs complaining about their card having strange issues with games or just straight up not being supported?
>>342471681
>at max
You're still lying lol
I'm lucky to get 60fps at medium settings in most new games on my 7970 at 1080p
>>342469098
>being this delusional
Nigger I've been waiting for them to restock the 1080 for a week
>>342470282
Atleast with higher fps its that way.
Your old ugly games suddenly become silky smooth experiences and you start gimping down the graphic settings in never titles trying to acquire that level of smooth.
newegg accidently had it up earlier too
>>342471957
>never
newer*
>>342471936
Then you either haven't overclocked it or you have a shitty CPU. Also
>expecting 60fps on a 6 year old card
anything above 30 is more than good enough if you still want almost max visual fidelity
>>342469098
new meme alert?
>>342469098
Neat, I was hoping I'd be able to run it at 1080p@144Hz with max settings, seems like that's possible.
>>342471936
>7970
To be fair that card belongs in a museum, and I'm still pretty sure you can run overwatch on high at a stable 60 fps.
>>342470894
>laptop
why live?
>>342469098
>AMD
>not a failure
Pick one.
>>342469098
sold my gtx 970 today for 230
gonna buy a rx480 with 8 gb for 250
>>342471681
>I never said maxed out retard.
Lets see
>>342470506
>I can run 95% of games at max
>>342469098
He said it may not have been so it probably wasn't.
>running a 1GB GTX 650
>hear about this card
It's a poorfag wet dream.
>>342470358
Is it bollocks.
>>342473297
nigga
>>342469863
Why do you type 9s like gs?
Them low low prices eh, what ...hang on.....
A fucking potato could run overwatch.
>>342471139
What else do you use a high end GPU for these days?
>>342473461
overwatch is quite demanding, your post is nonsense
what is this a potato pc can run overwatch meme
im pretty sure the ps4 can't even run it at 60 fps
>>342473461
>296,89 EURO ????
WHAT IS THAT SHIT
>>342473908
A 750Ti can handle that. It's pretty lenient I think. Not that a potato can run it, but not exactly demanding.
>>342473834
Nigger, look at Overwatch benchmarks, you will hardly see any card with less than 60 fps running it
Overwatch is demanding if you have HD4000
>tards shitting themselves over new cards
>meanwhile I'm using my 6 year old 6970 and playing every game I want at 60 fps
dumb consumerists, this is why you'll always be poor and stupid
>>342473834
>>342473908
This will for example AMD Athlon II x4 630, 2.80GHz
8GB Ram
Nvidia GeForce GTX 650
quite a demanding game, my fucking arse, ok tell me what pc specs you have please Id like a laugh
>tfw buying nvidia but shilling amd so I don't have to buy trashcards just to keep competition around
>>342474137
I have that card, and I can't play every game at 60fps. You're full of shit.
>>342474187
you will not get 60fps at even 1600x1200 with that pc
>>342474208
keyword is "I want"
plot twist: the only game he wants to play isthe shitposting game
>>342474278
whats your specs?
>>342472464
That card is basically a 380 though.
>>342474638
higher than those
>>342472886
Pretty dumb considering real world benches are saying the 480 is weaker than the 970
>>342473934
>people still dont know about euro taxes
>>342469098
Rare
Do you sell it?
>>342474769
Haha.
>>342474741
so you got a potato then, Id buy it for console then fella.
Hmmm, wait for a 1070, wait for the new Budget card, or get a 980 now that the price has dropped. My 770 is finally dead.
>>342474781
its not euro taxes, its the way taiwanese and chaiwanese fuckers sell hardware at 1$=1€
anyway the cards arent even out yet, any retailer can ask whatever price they want for them, they might even fix prices depending on their relative perofmance to other cards for higher profit
the msrp is 199$ though
>>342474198
pretty much this desu senpai.
i fell for the AMD meme and that shit is awful if youre and actual enthusiast. crossfire is so much more unreliable than SLI and the cards get insanely hot when you start pushing them to the limit. also OC potential is ass.
but i dont want an nvidia monopoly.
>>342474769
Where do you get that? I keep hearing this stupid nonsense, but nobody actually posts shit.
>>342474982
Same place as where it says the 480 is better than it really is
>>342474824
go play minecraft with your 650 or 750 retard
>>342475075
The only one I found is a synthetic benchmark telling me that 480 is just below 980
Are you going to post ihe benchmark or not, fuccboi?
>>342475103
mines a bit higher than that its a four figured number card.
"retard" .. wew on the comeback there.
>>342475127
Im not the anon who said it was like the 970.
Im the guy who says that everything you read on how good/shit it is is all talk and bollocks.
Sooner you realise the better
>>342470847
That's just disingenuous anon
>>342471927
because nvidia has the market share at the moment so developers are lazy and only end up furthering the issue
>>342470723
Max settings on r9 390 can't maintain 60fps
>>342475286
Why do you even shove yourself into the conversation then? All I want is the proof from "real world benches", not your demagogue
>>342474208
>>342474292
maybe you shouldn't be retarded normies playing the newest FOTM game every month like Division or whatever other AAA crap you've got going for you there
>>342475524
Because you dumb fucking prick there are no benchmarks. Theyre not allowed to release any yet.
Jesus christ.
>>342469098
>https://youtu.be/933LBq34y8I
The video shows him running 4k (max settings if he's to be believed) at above 30ish fps since the game runs really sluggish at that point
Didn't look like 60fps smooth, so that would put it in FuryX / 980Ti ballpark, for 200$ ?
>>342471927
I only see NVidia complaints on Steam discussions instead, that's weird. I also never had problems with AMD, that's really strange.
>>342475948
Theyre both shit at times ok.
Done everyones happy
>>342475593
If you're not talking about recent games, then your input in GPU power is irrelevant.
>>342476443
The only good game released recently was Witcher 3, and I played that fine on 50 fps.
>>342475447
I honestly don't believe that, my GTX 970 3.5 never drops below 80 fps at maximum settings and 1920x1080.
>>342476591
I don't think I was able to run it at that framerate.
>>342476665
I'm just letting you know my experience, friend
>>342476926
I'm a computer science bachelor, I know how to take care of my PC and make the most of it.
>>342477208
kek.
It was probably because of my CPU I realize now though.
>>342477247
What is it? I'm using i5-3280p, modest but pretty good
>>342477297
I think an AMD 965 X4 or something. It was pretty shit at that time.
>>342477191
Which CPU are you using? Every benchmark I find has your card (even the reference models) get above 80 fps as a minimum.
>>342469098
>using overwatch as a benchmark
laughing my ass off f.am
>>342477380
Yeah, that's about 20-30% worse than mine benchmark-wise.
Getting 2 1080's.
I really don't give a fuck.
Gonna get a 144hz monitor that does 2500 res.
Not gonna have to touch this shit for 5-10 years, because graphical fidelity is at a peek, it's all about dat 4k now, but I'm choosing 1440p because 4k is too fucking big for me, I have a 4k monitor right now.
Plus I do gamedevvan, and want the best setup, you won't be able to run XFIRE radeons that bear 2 1080's without having a high as fuck power cost.
>>342472886
Who the hell bought your 970 for 230? If that is true, I'm going to sell mine.
>>342478096
SLI is a shitty meme, dude. Most games support it horribly if at all.
What's all this 480/1070 shitposting about anyway?
I need to replace my 660ti, so I was thinking of getting a 1070. Is that bad?
>>342478559
AMD/Nvidia fans are fanatic, not really new.
480 is cheaper than the 1070, but performs worse. It depends on what you want. I think the 1070 is also not available easily.
I still choose NVIDYA
Because I just like the smell of burning plastic.
>>342478559
Is there a real huge difference between the 1070 and the 1080?
I want to get one of them but I don't know if I should just go the extra mile and get the 1080. I have a 144hz monitor
>>342470358
HAHAHAHAHAHA
>>342470358
>AMDcucks are literally deluding themselves into thinking Overwatch is demanding
>>342469098
It's not like overwatch is a high fidelity game.
Is there any reason to get a 1070/1080 if you're playing at 1080p/60hz?
>>342477419
i7 930
I get 80fps sometimes, but during high action it can drop as low as 40fps, I've had to lower my settings
>>342479916
Slightly more future proofing? Not a whole lot, though. 480 is probably the sweetspot for 1080/1440 @ 60 FPS.
>>342479371
what anime is taaus
>>342478469
The new bridge is pretty good, games coming out are using about 95% of a 2nd 1080's cards power, something that people don't realize here.
If you buy a $400 then xfire/SLI you will only really be effective for 2 cards, which is why 2 1080's, while expensive as fuck, will dominate anything on the market.
>>342480060
>480 is probably the sweetspot for 1080/1440 @ 60 FPS.
Yeah but
>AMD
>>342479916
nope
>>342480383
What's wrong with AMD? Most of the complaints I see are years out of date.
>>342480060
If you really believe this you are going to be gutted when the 480s are released and benchmarked.
these wont be doing a decent graphic setting 60fps @1440. not from a single card.
Riddle me this you disgusting cunts. 2 480's or 1 1070?
>>342478920
If it's 1080p or you can't spend the extra $300 go a 1070, otherwise go a 1080 because it 20% extra performance or something, but most people will tell you a 1070 is all you'll need.
http://www.pcadvisor.co.uk/feature/pc-components/nvidia-gtx-1080-vs-gtx-1070-price-specs-comparison-new-release-3640925/
1070 is a bit more than a titan X, a 1080 will get 15-20 more FPS than a 1070.
Really depends if you got the cash, I'm the type of person that if I'm spending $700 I'll spend a bit more to make it worthwhile.
>>342480727
well since 480*2=960, and 960>1070, you should obviously get the 1070 since it's a bigger number
>>342480631
Its just nvidia fanboys get really anal when they hear the word AMD
>>342480876
How do you manage to keep your memes this fresh and spicy?
>>342469098
Do not post this, remember to buy our new 1080 with our nvidia™ Cuck Your Mother™board so you can play it The way our executives want it to be played®™
I thought the 1070 was supposed to be $350 why is it $500+ everywhere
>>342480727
>SLI/Crossfire EVER
Anon.
>>342470358
>>342470358
Are you fucking retarded?
I can run overwatch on a 6 year old rig.
Radeon HD 5850
4gb ram
AMD Athlon II x4 620 Processor
>>342469098
What happens if you have both nvida and amd cards in the same computer?
>>342481057
Cheapest one here in 390 pounds.
>>342481115
Baby Jesus cries.
>>342481057
Always assume with ANY card that the actual price will be the MSRP + 30-50%.
I hope you guys bought AMD stock. Shit is going up like crazy.
>>342480876
>960>1070
Wat?
How much can i sell my Sapphire AMD Radeon HD 7970 for. Srs answers only pls no memes.
>>342481313
can of coke & wagon wheel. Thats about all its worth
>>342481115
You can only use one of them at once.
>>342481115
Why would you divide by 0?
>>342481313
Would've been $200 if you opted to sell it like two months ago.
>>342481451
But it's the best value budget gaming card on the market.
>>342481313
I sold a 7950 for 180 dollarydoos, but that's in Australia.
>>342481313
Maybe $100.
Considering they are new for like $200
>>342478096
>graphical fidelity is at a peek
[citation needed]
Anyone know if the 480 will be any better than the 390?
>>342481598
Welcome to last gen where we were stuck with a level of graphics thanks to consoles
>>342481617
From what I have read (which is people guessing/using the information they have) its said itll be around the 390/390x mark but uses less power.
>>342481617
In some areas, but it'll be worse if you don't get an 8gb mem card
>>342481507
Fuck
>>342481561
Good enough
>>342475447
Wat? I've got a i5 4690k and r9 390 and on max settings it averages at 80 fps. Stop speaking out of your ass m8.
Name a single PC game which requires a beast of a computer to play at 60 FPS and is also a good game
Go.
>>342471713
I dont own a really high end 4k tv.. But mine supports the resolution.
Dosnt mention it anywhere tho
>>342481806
Witcher 3
>still have a gtx660
>still plays games just fine
Why should i upgrade?
>>342481865
Not even remotely a good game
Next
>>342481806
Undertale easily
>>342481874
So you can play at a resolution higher than 1024x768.
>>342481865
I have an HD7870 and get medium-high settings.
Foliage is really the only demanding setting in that game.
>>342481995
There isn't.
>>342471093
>maxed at 2560x1440 144fps
980ti+4790k here. You're a goddamn liar.
>>342481865
^^ this.
or battlefront.
>>342482025
It plays 1080p no issues on high settings
>>342481754
I'm not just making shit up, I'm relating my own experience
That's great if yours is running better than mine, or maybe you just don't notice when your FPS drops, but in high action is when you need FPS the most, and it's when it lacks the most
>>342469098
>1070s
>in stock
>>342469098
>sped up gameplay so we can't see frame drops
>may or may not be 4k
>>342482063
Battlefront doesn't require a good PC for 60 fps
>>342469098
Why does this faggot's computer look like a microwave though?
>>342482063
>Battlefront
>Good
>Demanding in the slightest
>>342482098
Not that guy, but that's definitely the fault of your processor. You'll see an improvement if you upgrade to a i5-2500k at least. I have a 970 with a i5-4670k and hover around 90-100 on max settings. 390 is similar in power
>>342482063
My 7970 can play it at mostly max settings 60fps
>>342482352
Yeah, my processor is definitely old, I jumped on the i7 meme around 6 years ago
>480 comes out
>is everything we've been hearing it us
>card manufacturers add SICK FANS and charge $400 for them
Nothing to see here.
>>342469098
>Overwatch at 4K
Oh wow it's literally nothing the game still looks like shit
>>342469980
>game
>tfw waiting for after market 1070 to come out just to replace my dying HD 7950
Overwatch was made with toasters in mind and is well optimized.
480 is still underperforming compared to a fucking 970.
>>342469098
>hand-drawn memes
is this how the internet ends?
https://youtube.com/watch?v=BN7bEnMs9bc witcher 3
https://youtube.com/watch?v=tZ3wjKKi0sk GTA V
>>342483327
>Overwatch was made with toasters in mind and is well optimized.
Just because it was optimized well and runs on a great engine doesn't mean it was made for toasters.
If a game runs like shit on everything but the latest hardware, then the game is shit itself.
Not to sound like a cock sucking faggot, but Blizzard has always had games that ran like butter cause of their engines and that's what I like about them.
>>342483662
>blizzard game
>not made to run on toasters
They want to hit the largest audience as possible.
>>342483662
>If a game runs like shit on everything but the latest hardware, then the game is shit itself.
Well, not always. If the graphical fidelity is low as in the case of Overwatch, then yes.
>>342483662
>launching mgs V on my 550ti thinking it will run like shit because it's a 4 year old computer
>engine is so great it runs a 60 fps on high
Blizzard games run on toasters, but they scale upward horribly, so they need good hardware to max out.
How are people not used to this after so many years?
>>342483626
Not all that impressed with the W3 test. 60-70 FPS without hairworks. I guess that is nice for a 200 dollar card though.
>>342484000
A 200 dollar card with no drivers.
>>342482374
>>342482336
>>342482206
Indeed in my error I typed the wrong game, Im so ashamed, i meant battelfield
>tfw fucking 8 year old i7 920 is still kicking, it sucks power but still works
>just gotta wait probably 3 weeks for vendors to come out with a 4gb 480 with a goddamn DVI-D port because I need my 144hz for older games
I hope this processor never dies,
nvidia drivers are dog trash and pretty much worse than amd's at this point
>>342484090
>that meme again
>>342484240
$1 has been processed to your account pajeet.
>>342484261
No, I don't mean "lol AMD don't release drivers".
I mean the 480 has no drivers yet. Like, none at all. Any benchmarks will be misleading because the drivers aren't optimised at ALL.
>>342484261
>>342484090
That's no meme. Those drivers don't have alot of polaris shit working yet.
>>342484000
Hairworks is a Nvidia thing. AMD cards react poorly to it.
>>342484361
Yep just gotta wait 5 years for them to be optimized. :^)
>>342484414
More like 1 week.
>>342484414
Fuck off, we both know AMD has solved their drivers problem.
>>342484414
This hasn't been relevant in years.
If you wanna talk shitty driver support, maybe talk about how Nvidia make two year old cards obsolete?
>>342484451
>>342484506
>>342484550
Pajeet pls they're not paying you enough.
>>342483775
It's shameful how this is the exception and not the standard.
Companies don't optimize anymore
>>342484240
>>342484261
Thank you
₹35 has been deposited to WCCFTech Indian Bank इंडियन बैंक #138702940
>>342474781
>people still dont know about euro taxes
VAT is usually around 20% and the MSRP is $199 (€175), those are just Jewish merchant prices.
>be from a third world european country
>minimum wage is low as shit
>cards are massively overpriced
I just hate this world.
Hey pcucks, is this a good build?
http://pcpartpicker.com/user/Lonxu/saved/MRNmP6
Would my FX 6350 bottleneck one of these, or does AMD assume at this point you're running it with Intel or (in a few months) Zen?
>>342484760
Don't try to play first world games then
>spending $600 on a graphics card
what the fuck is wrong wrong with you
>install the latest stable Nvidia drivers two weeks after their release
>Nvidia windows kernel mode driver stopped responding
>card is dead for good
Just tell I won't have to deal with this anymore with AMD cards, the last Radeon I bought was a 9600XT,
>>342484772
get a cheaper psu and get twice the ram since you won't be updating this build
>>342484772
>http://pcpartpicker.com/user/Lonxu/saved/MRNmP6
Its not bad. I'd personally get two 4 gig sticks of RAM instead of one 8 gig stick but its your call.
the SSD should be fine, but I would highly recommend getting a standard hard drive soon afterwards.
I've never heard of the case or the brand so I can't say one way or the other but the price doesn't inspire confidence.
>>342484772
>Only an SSD
It's good for windows but you can't do shit with 250gb. Add a 2tb HDD with that.
Otherwise it's ok.
The CPU is pretty shit though. 3.2GHz with no overclocking? You might as well pick an older CPU and motherboard so you can get 4.2 at least with OC.
>>342485205
The CPU is fine. It'll get the job done for most games if he's just looking for 1080/60
>>342485038
Thank you pajeet.
₹25 has been deposited to WCCFTech Indian Bank इंडियन बैंक #138702940
>>342470358
my GT 630 wants to speak with you.
>>342485303
So? It's still a very bad choice when you can get better for the same price, or less.
>>342485310
I just want to know how many times has AMD fucked up their products with new drivers senpai.
>>342485205
Any suggestions? I have zero experience with PC stuff
>>342484772
>>342485886
I'll give you suggestions if you give me sauce on that pic
>>342485886
Check out logicalincrements.com
>>342485886
Just pick a 6600k for 20$ more.
Or check out the i5 4690k or 4670k pre-owned on ebay or whatever. But you'll have to change your motherboard for a 1150 slot.
>amd
meh, I'll wait till it's out and see what gamers nexus thinks. thats my nigga
my i5 4690k and 4gb 960 run everything fine right now though. downsampling overwatch at 1440p right now, runs great on ultra. I could get 4k to work I bet, but I'd have to turn too much crap down
I'm not going to update till I get a dank may may monitor with gsync. for now my IPS 1080p monitor with the slim bezel is straight cash homie.
>>342472886
lol you are getting a weaker card. you a fucking dumb anon
>>342481995
lol. youhave a shit pc. confirmed
>>342482061
bro once of my IRL bros has a 980ti. if you aren't doing 4k on overwatch. you are fucking retarded.
>TFW GTX 970
>Im going use it until HBM2 will become a thing
the waiting game is never over
>>342473550
literally nothing unless you have a 4K monitor. If all you are doing is 1080p then a 970 will handle pretty much anything on the market.
>>342486984
>gamers nexus
mah nigga
In a world of kiketubers, GN comes out with actual information and knows what the fuck theyre talking about instead of reading off a pre fabricated specs list straight from AMD/NVidia
WHAT THE FUCK IS THAT CASE?
Do people use shit like that nowdays?
>>342489161
Is it worth it?
I want to upgrade the whole PC in 3 months and will probably get an OC 480 but i would feel like fucking shit if HBM2 gave like a 300fps boost for 200$
>>342482494
I can absolutely confirm it's your processor m8.
I was running the game on a gtx980 and would get frame drops and I had no idea how that could be possible, but also was running it on an i5 2500k.
Just upgrdaed to 6600k and it runs flawlessly now.
is it worth to buy this meme card if I got an 750ti but are paying the power bills by myself?
>>342485205
Clock speed < IPC
A modern 3.2 will be able to do more than an old 4.2
>>342492782
I'd say yeah. Sufficiently better, and this thing is supposed to be very efficient. Though I think Nvidia's stuff is also supposed to be efficient, though it's more powerful so it will probably still use more than the 480.
