For Honor
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /v/ - Video Games
You are currently reading a thread in /v/ - Video Games
Discuss the game, your faction of choice, and what you'd like to see.
>>341990320
Knight is the only proper answer.
It's nice to see they are making a single-player component to the game.
Aztecs and Zulu would be cool.
>>341990474
Yeah, Knight is my warrior of choice as well. Warden, to be exact. I will build my Knight as a Sword of the Morning.
>Female Knights, Samurai and Vikins
Nope, I'm out.
>>341990683
And good riddance to you. Don't start this shit in my thread. Vikings, Samurai, and Knights didn't even live in the same time periods, take your "muh realism" and shove it up your ass.
>No ninja vs pirate
Fuck off with this shit. I didn't spend 6 years in high school debating assholes as to why pirates would win just to have some dumbass Dec not include them in the game
>>341990832
Still plenty of time for other factions as dlc, anon. Deadliest Warrior did that already, though, didn't they?
ホワイトピッグを殺し、日本を守れ!
>>341990896
Each to his own, but your folded steel won't save you.
>>341990320
>>341990474
>>341990637
Knightcucks inbound. Prepare for notstop bitching by fat fedoras about the inferiority of Japanese steel, half-swording, murder strokes, the superiority of medieval plate and weapons, as though any of that shit matters.
Also,
>Viking.
Enjoy praising Jesus Christ knightcucks, I'll be the drunk berserker with my barbo dick in all your wenches sporting massive guns.
>>341990971
this isnt exactly a realistic game, so I doubt all that armor advantage would mean jack shit
>>341990882
>Deadliest Warrior did that already, though, didn't they?
please don't remind me of that horseshit
>>341991018
>inb4 the thread devolves into /v/ orgasming about half-swording when replying to a post showing mordhau
i love knights but i hate the knight fanbase on here
just like how i love videogames but hate videogame culture
>>341990683
>no trans-samurai or disabled vikings
Nope, I'm out
Going to go full weeb for the sole purpose of them being the least popular faction most likely, baka gaijins
Feels like ive been waiting for this game since 2012
>>341990751
Women are realistically wearer than men they should be at home taking care of the kids at home not dying in 5 seconds during combat.
>>341991250
>samurai
>least popular
Lol you are dense...Enjoy the normal scrubs going in you f action kek
Vikings, Samurai, Knights, all are welcome here. How many opponents could a skilled player fight at once, do you think? I'm betting on two, any more and you'd be overwhelmed.
>>341991479
I doubt it, considering skyrim bringing nordic into popularity
>>341990896
The only right answer around here.
>>341991481
Considering the lockon and style switching, more than one is probably going to be difficult.
>>341991562
going by popularity it will be
knights>samurai>vikings
The next Rainbow Six.
I played it.
It's pretty fucking cool, and holy cow it's beautiful.
>>341991627
True, you'd have to use the environment against them and funnel them into chokepoints where they'd have to watch their swings.
>>341991018
IHow are you going to stick your dick in my qt knight while she's disemboweling you and your barbarian kin?
I can't be the only one.
But the only thing that triggers me is the shield the Samurai troops use. It completely kills their japanese style.
>>341991018
Vikings are shit, they lost most of the battles they had agaisnt organized armys, they only knew how to rape and murder innocents, because they're shitty warriors.
>>341990320
I hope some kind of rifle is in game, you know like carbine, bolt action etc..
>>341991952
>>341991968
Stop. Every reply will get more aggressive and less angry. If you don't stop, you'll spark an eternal flamewar.
For once, I hope Ubi would honor their customers with actually deliver a polished game with little to no technical difficulties. If they do that, then I can think about factions and other gameplay things. Highly doubt it though.
>>341991562
>one game comparing with years of pop culture showing samurais and knight as pure bad asses
>>341991667
This is more right...exception I believe samurai will be more popular because Kids Really love the katanas
>>341992126
But with the popularity of Game of Thrones, both Vikings and Knights will see a boost in fans, in all likelihood.
>>341991312
thia game clearly does not operate on the logic of our world mdespite having recognizable things
get over it
>>341992083
Ok sorry
>>341990683
>>341990751
>>341991085
>>341991312
>not knowing of the Onna-bugeisha
>>341991481
like that one guy said the lock on system will make it difficult but know that in other melee based games, sonetimes fighting 2 or more opponents can be an advantage. a group often has false confidence, none of them think they are the ones to be hit
>>341992385
It'd require situational awareness and control of the battlefield. You'd have to bottleneck them so their swings hit each other and so they don't flank you, or get them near a wall to throw them off.
>>341992385
That happens often in Chivalry Medieval Warfare, you can end up hitting three people and slaughtering them all at once if you have the initiative because none of them wanted to parry the strike.
>>341992083
Only until release.
Until then we'll just glare at each other angrily.
I have played the SP demo.
If you have any question.
>>341992583
Fuck, I'd love to play right now. As for release, it can't come soon enough. I can't wait to battle against and alongside all of you.
>>341991952
>Salty fedoraknight sad he gets cucked by savage gauls at every turn while his fair maidens enjoy Crom's BBC gene (Big Barbarian Cock).
>>341991968
>Giving a shit about historical accuracy.
>Implying knights didn't rape and kill peasents.
Grow up, armorfag.
>>341992698
Was it only for Vikings, or was it for all factions?
Also how can you play it, I want in. I can't wait 'till next year.
>>341992698
Any idea if Samurai will have the option to wield a Kanabo?
>>341992698
How does the style switching work? Do we need to match our opponent, or use a style that defeats theirs?
Can we attack without locking on? I noticed guard breaks, can we avoid being stunned by keeping our guard down?
>>341990320
>Shill this game, choose your arbitary faction
>please fucking buy it, ubisoft is nearly dead :(
Sage goes in all fields.
>>341992792
>Implying knights didn't rape and kill peasents
Actually, this is addressed in the Canterbury tales.
A knight raped a girl and was initially sentenced to execution before he was given a 1 in 10000 chance at living. He actually did it, but in the end had to marry an old hag and be laughed at by everyone.
>>341993000
numbers dont lie
/thread
>>341992818
No it was the knight part. You had to stop the assault on a stronghold.
I played it because I work a bit in the industry.
>>341992864
They shown various classes, and I'm pretty sure one of them was wielding one, it was a huge dude. It's these maces, right ?
>>341992938
From what I understood the style is completely free and you can use the one you want to defeat the opponent.
You can attack without locking on, it's very useful to kill all the trash mobs.
There's some sort of guard break, but I'm not sure how to counter it.
>its another "OMG THIS GAME LOOK AMAZING" only to be massively downgraded in graphics and performance at release Ubisoft title
When will you idiots learn
>>341993000
>>341993073
>Game gets shown for awhile
>Actually looks somewhat promising
>Asks for discussion on it, not even bringing Ubisoft into it
>'fucking shills'
At least try harder when you samefag. Waiting a minute before posting again just makes it so obvious.
>>341993202
Unless they change it down to the level of function and gameplay, I'll still buy it. I like every part of what I've seen, but especially the concept. So you do what you want.
>>341990683
>omg women in my game #triggered
Faggot.
>>341993163
Can you shift the direction you're looking mid attack?
i.e. "dragging" in chivalry?
>>341993000
You have absolutely no reason to live
>>341993234
Yes, you're shilling, we get it
Sage goes in all fields
OP here, do not respond to trolls. They are attempting to derail the thread and fill it with shitposting. Do not give them what they want.
>>341990896
>>341991614
They didn't use Japanese voice actor did they?
Those shouts sound really, really awful.
>>341993392
>>341993234
Nice samefag
>>341993353
I don't think you can, the game didn't mentioned it.
>>341993504
Not entirely. Seems they intermixed Japanese and English, at least for Saburo, the leader of the Samurai in the first Viking mission.
>>341993472
>please stop ruining my marketing hugbox
>only positive comments so i get paid please :(
Hello Ubisoft! How goes the Division these days?
Oh, thats right, you dropped it like a fucking brick after downgrading it.
>>341993472
>STOP CRITICIZING MY GAME
I mean, really? If you cant handle people pointing out how flawed this game is you shouldn't be on the internet.
I bet you're the same faggot who claimed the backstabbing was a 'feature' and not a consequence of its stupid as shit tab targetting tier combat system.
>>341990320
>being hyped for a Ubisoft game
Did they show anything about it at E3? I like the concept but I'll be surprised if it ends up being good
Anyone know if we'll be able to name our warrior? That'd be a nice feature, along with advanced customization and leveling.
>>341993759
I don't mind criticism, so long as it's game-related. It's these other posts that tear away from the game entirely and derail the thread that I don't like.
>>341990320
I would like to see a single Ubisoft game that isnt
1. Downgraded massively
2. Have huge performance issues
3. Doesnt have networking issues
4. Works on day 1
5. Gets real post release support and not shit all like Siege and Division
But considering most of this has been true for every single release in the past few years i doubt they will change. So lets just hope it flops instead so Ubisoft learns.
>>341993760
They showed a new trailer and a campaign gameplay video for the Vikings.
>>341993926
Well no one is doing that, so stop bitching and trying to make a hugbox.
>>341993969
I played it on PS4 and the game is beautiful.
It will probably be even better on pc
>>341992331
They were a meme
>>341993969
Fair enough. I'll still probably buy it, because I like the concept and the gameplay I've seen so far, and I probably won't regret it.
>>341993760
The gameplay looks tight, and the presentation was slick. The guy who did the presentation on it was practically roleplaying, I bet he doesn't even need that walking stick.
Who knows how it actually is because ubisoft, though. Cautiously optimistic because I love Chivalry:MW and the guy who did the presentation makes me want to join him in combat.
>>341994061
Yeah so was Division, Siege and nearly all Asscreed games faggot
This game will get ruined, thats a fact.
>>341994101
You're fucking cancer.
>>341994161
I played the game, you didn't.
And that's a fact.
>>341994101
>and I probably won't regret it.
Pfthahah, yeah you will. And a week after its release you wont be posting about it because of your buyers remorse.
>>341994217
>assumptions
I have played it you absolute fucking moron, and that's literally irrelevant anyway because ALL the previous games have had playable demos at one point or another and they ALL suffered from those problems at release because Ubisoft are shit developers.
Holy shit you're thick.
>>341994161
Sticks and stones, anon.
>>341994243
I sincerely doubt that. I think I know what I do and don't like better than you.
>>341993760
They executed the biggest hack in the history with Watch Dogs 2
>>341994217
And? So did Division and Siege and both had massive issues not in the staged/limited demos.
Ubisoft always fuck up the game for release.
>>341990320
Nothing, the gameplay looked boring as fuck and the story seems dumb as shit.
Not a single attractive thing about this, plus, Ubisoft.
>>341994362
You sure as hell doesn't sound like you did.
>>341994369
>I sincerely doubt that. I think I know what I do and don't like better than you.
No you dont, you're common as fuck on /v/ and you'll prove me right
Go ahead, screen cap this and post it a week or two after about how much you love the game when its getting horrid reviews and panned for all its issues at launch.
>>341994452
That's fine, the game doesn't have to be perfect.
>>341994542
I respect your opinion, friend.
>>341994556
It sounds like you didnt if you think any of Ubisofts fucking demos are in any way representative of final products and this game is good.
You're a moron, and thats that.
>>341994632
Being an insufferable cunt only drives people away from the game shill, you're shit at your job.
>>341994676
There wasn't any demo of siege and division.
I'm talking about the gameplay demo you fucking twat, you know, the game that was playable.
>>341992792
I know they also raped but atleast they were good fighters
>>341994676
I wish I was being paid to do this. As it is, I'm here, expressing my opinion, and I'll continue to do so no matter how many people accuse me of shilling.
>>341990320
>offers absolutely nothing that other games dont already do
>combat is casual as shit and has no depth
>Ubisoft
Dead on arrival. I kinda feel bad for them because the shitty reputation of Ubisoft has ruined any chance of the games from other teams within Ubi from being good. They obviously all have a defeatist 'well we are going to make money anyway because of the marketing budget, and people hate how shit our games are, so why bother making something good'. Self fulfilling prophecy to the max.
>>341994795
>There wasn't any demo of siege and division.
Oh wow, you have no idea what you're talking about
Opinion disregarded.
>>341994676
>>341991160
Apparently mordhau is the name of a WIP medieval combat game. Kinda like Chivalry but better. Mordhau can also be done in game
>>341994932
No argument I see.
Why are you so butthurt?
>>341990971
>nothing personnel, kid
>>341995073
You straight up didnt know that those games had open demos for people to test, you have no idea what you're talking about. End of discussion idiot.
>>341995094
Maybe there'll be a flash step perk so you can do it properly.
>>341990320
>M&B2
>Mordhau
>Inevitable Souls game
>MH
Dont need another swordnboard game, least of all a shitty Ubisoft one. Cash grab attempt to cash in on the genre.
>>341990751
>vikings samurai and knights didn't even live in the same period
But that's factually incorrect you fucking faggot.
>>341991018
>butthurt weeaboo identified
You poor baby.
>knightcuck
This literally means nothing while weeaboo reflects an actual subculture of tards.
>>341995217
All of that is probably true. I'd reserve judgment on its quality, although the caution is understandable due to Ubi's reputation.
>>341995128
No, there were open betas, at most.
And the few available E3 playable games where like advertised.
What people are against are the trailer that make the games looks better than they are.
But the betas always shown how the game is truly.
I told you: For honor is fucking beautiful, and the E3 demo I played will surely not be downgraded.
Now drink your milk, you sound like you will have a stroke.
>>341990320
>4vs4
>AI controlled mooks in multiplayer
I'll pass.
>>341995281
It is? I stand corrected then, anon, and apologize for my uneducated statement.
>>341995417
That's your prerogative.
The concept is fine, but it's an ubisoft hack and slash. I'm expecting it to end up being severely lacking in gameplay substance in exchange for pretty visuals.
>>341995564
They did arguably but not in the forms that we associate them with.
>>341990683
>giving a shit in a game with magic that's not trying toi be realistic
>>341995979
Is it confirmed that Apollyon is a God of War-type being? I've read other sources that say she's a warlord. Because I'm not sure how standard warriors can deal with an immortal being.
>>341995979
wait, this is important
>magic
does the game have magic? You'll be able to play magic users?
>>341996128
This is, to the best of my knowledge, not confirmed.
>>341995660
Um, yes it is. Thanks for pointing that out, I don't think I'd be aware of this fact if it wasn't for you.
>>341997241
It was my privilege.
