Spiderman PS4
- Home
- Board: /v/ - Video Games
- Reading: Spiderman PS4
>the coffee shop scene is gameplay
On a scale of 1-10 how likely is this to be true
>>341936915
>pedestrians and cars
one of the many things missing from free roam spidey games
>>341936915
Probably going to be similar to Ass Creed 3, when he jumped through apartments.
>>341937220
Im not one for the webbed pits, but I feel like it'd look really good for the outfit
>>341937185
>gameplay
I dont like the way this is going
>>341937220
>>341937630
Looks so damn good, but it's probably going to be 30fps
>>341936915
8 if its a qte or something simple like ninja run from MGR
0 for normal gameplay.
Even if it was a thing, I doubt it would happen that often since rendering interiors in an open world is very resource heavy
>>341937739
As long it's stable, I'm fine with it.
>>341937739
stable 30fps im willing to live with if its the goat spiderman game. Ill even buy that 'supercharged' ps4 and get this, its a first party game so i imagine theyll make use of their new console as much as they can. Silky smooth 40fps
So do we know if it's got moon swinging yet?
>>341936915
If this game is good, I'm buying a PS4. I've been waiting years for a good Spiderman game.
>>341938351
The only image of the swinging we have from the trailer. Looks like its anchored but then again so did every other moon swinging game since ultimate.
If that one faggot who keeps coming into these threads and saying its anchored confirmed could post his goddamn source im sure we'd all sleep better tonight
>>341938431
Yeah the same here, this is a game if it turns out good could be a system seller. A fair few anons were saying in the reveal thread how this would be their reason to buy a ps4, if the game turns out great Sony just sold a shit load more consoles
>>341938667
Did any game after movie 2 have anchored swinging?
>>341939104
3 did, but only certain versions
>>341939190
Did ultimate?
>>341939104
>moon swinging
ps1 games
spiderman 1 the movie game ps2
>anchored swinging
spiderman 2 the movie game ps2
spiderman 3 the movie game ps2
ultimate spiderman ps2
>fake anchored swinging but is infact moon swigning
web of shadows ps2/ps3
ASM1 ps3
ASM2 ps3/ps4
whats amazing is that this is in chronological order and somehow we've regressed despite moving up 2 consoles since it was perfected
Excited to see a Marvel Video game universe happening, and starting out with Spider-Man, that's amazing.
It kinda feels tainted with that new costume though... I just feel like if theyre going to start something big with spiderman use the most iconic spider-man, not some dumb looking new costume. Im sure youll be able to unlock the other suits, but that dumb looking costume will be THE video game spiderman.
>>341939246
>any other platform
>this game
are the guys who did the game with the lightning powers? i can't remember the game's name.
>>341936915
It's exclusive to the movie game machine. It'll be a quicktime event
>>341939568
No, not the infamous guys.
The ratchet and clank/spyro guys.
>people still fall for E3 bullshots
Come on guys, its 2016 FFS!
I don't care, I just want to know if I'll be able to piledrive someone of off the empire state building.
Probably like asscreed where he just does it automatically
>>341939104
>>341939442
I got this.
>>341936915
10
Will be a QTE.
Still super hype to do some web swinging tho.
Please
God
I am fucking begging you
Have this game not suck
I want a good non-licensed Spiderman game for fucking once.
Spiderman 2 was great, but that was over 10 years ago.
>>341939516
but how will it go from here, to have their universe fractured as one game exclusive, another multiplat etc is insane. From here on id just confine it all to one platform for unity desu.
Sony should be sucking marvels dick if they do that though, the amount of consoles a series of solid
>spiderman
>ironman
>cap america
games could sell is insane
>>341939662
>>341939568
Kinda wish it was suckerpunch though. Infamous series had very fun movement and theyve churned out fewer flops compared to insomniac so id be less worried
ooohhhhhhhhhh nooooooooo, Dooooctoooooor Coooooonnoooooors claaaaaassssssssss.
>>341939969
>no time constraints
>good developer with their biggest team ever working on it
>first party game so there is a desire for it to be good
>probably a huge budget
Im so scared itll go wrong somehow and next year this time we'll be moon swinging
>>341940082
Sure, but Sunset Overdrive is still fresh on their minds so I'm sure they all learned a lot from the mobility in that game.
Not to mention, everyone and their mother bitches about moonswinging so I'm sure they're very aware of it.
Just glad it's finally out of Activision's hands. Shit.
>>341936915
>breaks the glass for no reason
What a dick
>>341940603
>Not to mention, everyone and their mother bitches about moonswinging so I'm sure they're very aware of it.
You would think this yet here we are anon, 12yrs after spiderman 2 and each dev seems to think we want everything but proper swinging
>>341936915
>On a scale of 1-10 how likely is this to be true
0
you can just see by how fluid the animations are that spidey isn't being controlled by player input
>>341939969
Have faith in Insomniac, their A-team always deliver.
>>341939780
I feel like this should mention that one Attack on Titan fan game
>>341940651
Least now, spidey is paying for the things he breaks for the most part in the comics
>>341940867
They didn't deliver with the last Ratchet and Clank for me. I'm still pissed about the bouncer, the goddamn best weapon in the entire series.
>>341938667
Already confirmed to be anchored, retard.
>>341941067
That game was great though. It was meant as a reboot and they did it well. And the Bouncer was OP as fuck. Also the Bouncer has always been a shot weapon so I don't know why you're complaining.
>>341936915
Another good game kept as hostage,,, god dammit sony
>>341941067
It was a great game, if admittedly a little bare bones
>>341941441
source it you motherfucker
IF I FLIP THE PIZZAS...
There better be a kid mode
>>341939442
spider man 3 ps3 also had anchored swinging
>pic unrelated
>>341941493
>I don't know why you're complaining
I'm complaining because I couldn't get it without pre ordering it. The limited frame rate legitimately affects me and the horrible job they did telling the story through Quark's perspective also made the game worse for me.
it's obviously bullshit, the table rocking and items being thrown into the air are way too perfect
>>341941787
I forgot about spiderman 3, why did you remind me
>>341941787
It's not funny anon, people died waiting for a decent spiderman game
Well seeing as it's a Sony exclusive I'm gonna say zero
>>341941889
We cannot forget the sins of the past.
>>341941934
>you could die between now and release
>your body will only remember the shitty moon swinging games of the last decade and a half
>>341936915
10
http://www.pushsquare.com/news/2016/06/e3_2016_jeepers_spider-man_ps4s_trailer_was_gameplay
https://twitter.com/insomniacgames/status/742558569971621888
Gameplay confirmed.
>>341941947
>muh Sony boogeyman
Literally fucking kill yourself, you pathetic consolewarring child
>>341940923
Is this loading for anyone else? I get the Unity loading screen but then it just stays at zero percent http://fenglee.com/game/aog/
>>341942109
not even that anon but you need to relax
>>341942084
>https://twitter.com/insomniacgames/status/742558569971621888
nice
>>341942084
"It is the game" could mean anything. A QTE, Assassin's Creed style 'hold button to watch parkour animation' movement
>>341942084
>that is the game
it certainly is
>gameplay
it's not
>>341942084
I wonder how it plays because it looks really scripted
>>341942084
anon ive bought my ticket to the hype train and im about to board, am i being lied to?
>>341942084
>I don't know what scripted events are
>I don't know what "press x to epic" is
No.
>>341942407
just like killzone 2 was gameplay lmao, marketing boy on twitter isn't going to mess this up
>>341942197
I'm tired of every fucking thread devolving into the same consolewar bullshit because of the fucking underage shits on this board.
We finally have a Spider-Man game worth getting excited over and we have to sit back and watch as these fucking spergs ruin all discussion because it's on a Sony platform? Fuck that shit.
>>341936915
Zero.
>>341942521
Damn. You mad.
>>341942405
this is what it is then. All those epic fights and moves showed in the trailer all looked like QTE or press x for awesome to happen
>>341942493
Explain. From what I remember Killzone 2 was a shooting game with no qtes
>>341942109
I own a PS4 you fucking autist. Sony just has a history of pulling this shit.
>>341942732
Am I mad that literal children ruin every thread with their platformwar faggotry? Yes, I'm mad.
And I'm mad that I'm going to have watch this game get dragged into that.
>>341942810
The initial Killzone 2 trailer was totally prerendered
>>341942873
Sony pulling exactly what?
Sony isn't developing this game you moron.
>>341942745
If you played any past spiderman you would know that shit like swinging objects around you and throwing them as well as doing that front flip slam on a bad guy, are actual moves you can do. What is most likely scripted is the op scene.
>>341942873
>Sony just has a history of pulling this shit
Name one.
It looks like real-time PS4 graphics so it's most likely gameplay
>>341942521
not the 2 anons in this convo but mate i think youve jumped the gun here. Sony are known to bullshot a lot and it seems that is what he was taking a swipe at, saying that since it sony published the odds of it being gameplay are very low is what is meant i believe.
This isnt some console war stuff, just an anon calling out a company that consistently puts out bullshots.
Buying a ps4 for this game btw
>>341942969
>I was only pretending to be retarded
See.
This is the shit I'm talking about.
Fucking children and their consolewar hard ons. Literally killing this board.
>>341942929
which is the exact discussion being had here
>op
>how likely is the coffee shop to be gameplay
>>341942906
the hype was unreal too, such a glorious failure
>>341936915
Hold R1 and forward so the animation goes is technically gameplay.
>>341943176
No, that was my answer to both OP and an anon trying to turn it into console war shitposting bullshit.
>>341943018
Killzone 2 and the last three Naughty Dog games.
>>341943150
>wahhhhh
Fuck off back to your safe space
>>341942906
Just watched it, did they really try to pass that off as gameplay? That would be real shitty.
>hold the PARKOUR button to perform PARKOUR
it's not really gameplay if you think about it
>>341942273
>>341942285
>>341942405
Name one time Insomniac lied. Not saying it doesn't happen, but I'm pretty sure Insomniac hasn't pulled anything like that.
The graphics aren't even that good (especially compared to the Horizon, God of War and Days Gone trailers) so I don;t see how it's so unbelievable that something cool is legit. Ratchet & Clank promo stuff was honest.
>>341942810
Do you have no memory? Sony showing kz2 and then saying how their prerendered video was gameplay and guerrilla games scrambling to make it run nicely in time
>>341943207
i loved it desu, they didnt reach it but did damn well
>>341942906
the funny thing is looking back on that trailer, it looks so fucking bad, like graphically it looks fucking atrocious and much worse than most of the AAA games that came out in 2009 and killzone 2 itself, the only parts of it that looked better were some cool smoke animation thats not possible outside of prerendered cutscenes
not defending the bullshit practice of outright lying to the customer though, i just find it funny that despite initially thinking the original trailer looked better only to look back at it years later and realize how bad it really looked.
>>341943294
>actually defending consolewar shitposting
KILL YOURSELF
I
L
L
Y
O
U
R
S
E
L
F
>>341943365
No one is saying it's a lie (at least not me). Scripted events count as "gameplay" sure but you're not really doing anything other than holding the parkour button and forward or something along those lines.
>>341943365
>Name one time Insomniac lied.
Right now.
Based Insomniac doesn't care about your tears
>>341943648
absolutely rekt
>>341943537
How is it consolewar shitposting if I own a PS4? How many times do you need to be tricked before you wise up?
>>341943326
Except it is.
>>341943326
as long as you hold a button some anon will argue it is
>>341943365
I dont think anyone has beef with insomniac games, many people here defend them in regards to their flop with the game they made for EA, webm related. Its more that its a sony exclusive and involved with sony computer interactive which has the ability to taint a trailer the same way a ubisoft logo can taint a 'gameplay' video
>>341943648
can you fuck off with console war shit?
>>341941682
I don't have a source but I remember the dev saying that not only do you need a building to anchor to, but the swinging is momentum based and the left web shooter/ right web shooter are separate buttons. Game doesn't just have a "press X to web swing" system.
>>341943761
You literally pulled the "I was only pretending to be retarded" card.
Nah, fuck this. I've given you too many (You)s already.
Fuck off, kid. I'm done replying to you.
>>341943793
>If that one faggot who keeps coming into these threads and saying its anchored confirmed could post his goddamn source im sure we'd all sleep better tonight
right on time friend, the claim, the no source.
Why do this to me man? Im willing to spend 500 on this console for one game and here you go giving me false hope
>>341943776
That isn't console war stuff.
>>341937739
30fps and definitely going to be downgraded as is the ritual.
>>341943951
How was I pretending to be retarded? Sony is publishing the fucking game.
>>341936915
I think it's part of a QTE chase sequence, but it's not like it's impossible for it to be pulled off as part of actual gameplay. There's nothing particularly complex to the sequence, as it's run, jump, run, wall jump and web zip
>>341943776
why are you so on edge
calm yourself
Yes but it will be simple QTE/in-game cutscene transissions like Assassin's Creed has had since AC3 only for some specific buildings with 2 or 3 different animations
>>341936915
>Spiderman just jumps all over the tables breaking everyone's shit and then breaks the store's window
Some hero.
>>341944197
Making fishface is literally pretending to be retarded and shitposting.
>>341937739
It will be, Insomniac has said they won't be making anymore 60fps games. But if it's a steady 30fps like Ratchet then that's fine. Just not as good.
Spider-Man games have always let me down after Spider-Man 2 and Ultimate.
>>341944312
After playing the swing animation over and over again, the web ling sort of snaps into position when he swings.
>>341944513
line*
>>341943497
I just remember it looked incredible back then. Same with that Getaway 3 demo. It's hard being impressed by graphics anymore, I mean sure things look much better now but as far as I was concerned those things already looked really realistic back then. Like Battlefront 3 looks really quite good, but it didn't give me any wow feeling because I already had them a decade ago and only in retrospect do you see what's missing compared to now
Can't wait, but I hate how this is Sony exclusive. People threw a shit fit over RotTR for being exclusive, but someone as big as Spiderman is okay?
>>341944324
I think (you) are the one pretending to be retarded. The publisher heavily influences a game.
>>341944673
Bloodborne Crushed them, they have no will to fight left.
>>341944356
They never said they wouldn't try for 60 again, they only did 30 for R&C since they were only just learning the PS4's hardware.
>>341944673
Tomb Raider was not developed or published by Microsoft. Spiderman is being published by Sony. Different situations.
>>341944772
>Bloodborne Crushed them, they have no will to fight left.
Im not sure what your point is, but bloodborne being exclusive is fine, cause its not a sequel or have previous games being Multiplat. Its also not one of the most loved characters in history either
>>341944718
Now you're shitposting with this deflection.
>Yuri Lowenthal
Dropped
>>341944869
Not really. Peoples excuse was always that the first game was Multi-plat, not that it wasn't published by Microsoft
>>341944849
Not true. Insomniac said this before the PS4 came out. Everything game they ever made after Crack in Time is 30 fps.
>>341944896
Bloodborne had the biggest shitposting of a game of all time, every single thread from its first showing to months after release was pure console wars shitposting. It got so bad it even spawned this guy. I don't think anything could match the intensity of hell those threads were.
>>341944869
Not really. Peoples excuse was always that the first game was Multi-plat, not that it wasn't published by Microsoft
(Nothing wrong with this post mods)
>>341943793
>I remember the dev saying
Oh, because game devs never lie.
>>341944945
Why are you still giving me (you)s?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zAb2rP9Wp-U
>>341945152
>liking Yuri Lowenthal
>>341945104
No they didn't.
>>341945083
It wasn't developed or published by Microsoft, they have no affiliation to Tomb Raider. Sony is publishing Spiderman and that's why it's exclusive. 99% of games published by Sony are exclusives, this is no different. A better comparison would be if Red Dead 3 were a PS4 exclusive, since Sony has no direct affiliation that game's creation. That would be bullshit.
>>341944896
I don;t know what board you have been browsing but the butthurt over Bloodborne was immense.
It may have no previous games but most people consider it a souls game which it is considering it basically dark souls painted a different color.
The shitposting that Bloodborne caused has only died down recently, I have seen some depressing posts and even some anons buying ps4s.
>>341945229
The game sitll wound up looking that good.
You can cease shitposting any time.
>>341936915
Probably a non-interactive shortcut like in Assassin's Creed 3
Hope theres fun things to do in the open world.
>>341945357
They said that game would probably be their last one to be 60 fps. You can focus on the use of the word "probably" if you must, but they made it clear they give no fucks about high frames.
>>341939104
>>341938667
They need to make a video explain how in depth the swinging is. I'm not getting hyped until I know. I want both arms being controllable for swinging. I want it to anchor to buildings. I want speed to depend on when you jump off the web line. I want to be able to fwip out both web lines by hitting both L2 and R2 and doing the slingshot move anywhere I damn well choose.
I know Insomniac is a decent dev but everyones been burned too many times by shitty Spidey games for me to just accept what they said until there's solid proof behind it and not just a trailer. Which sucks because I really want to be hyped about this, fuck.
>>341945163
>>341945386
I will forever be happy that the biggest case of butthurt in /v/ history was PCucks mad about Bloodborne. PCucks are eternally BTFO because of this.
>>341945602
>L2 and R2
God no. That would be so clunky if they don't do it right, I'd rather just have them keep it simple and fun
>>341945380
>Red Dead 3
Bad choice.
R* owe Sony an exclusive after they made the Agent deal, so feasibly, if RDR3 were to be Sony exclusive, it'd likely be to make up for that (and thus be Sony funded).
>>341943769
Sauce on the animation
>>341945702
That's how Spidey 2's swinging was. You had control over both of his arms.
>>341945728
Do we even know how far that game got? do we even know if they signed a contract or anything?
Besides, I doubt they'd do it with a game like that, not when they can get loads more cash by being multi-plat
GOOOOOOOO
>>341945501
lol
How about incorporating the touch pad into web swinging?
>>341945875
For the PS2? I just got done playing it, that's not true.
>>341945875
You sure? I played the shit out of it yet don't remember that
I'll take your word for it
>>341945931
Mods stop deleting posts that are a-okay
>comfy as fuck Spidey thread a few hours ago
>all sorts of wish lists, Spidey info and general Spidey goodness all round
>come into this thread seeking the same
>console war faggotry and Bloodborne
GG.
>>341936915
7
Sony always do bullshots
>>341946017
>>341946051
Spider-Man 2 had two options for swinging, simple and advanced. You guys probably played with it on simple.
>>341945152
He doesn't even sound like he's from Queens
>>341946187
What's wrong with mentioning Bloodborne?
>>341946364
Neither did Josh Keaton, or most of the VAs.
>>341946275
In Spider-Man 2 you used one button to swing, one button to boost. The stick was used to point where you wanted to swing from.
>>341946372
It has no place in this thread.
TOP KEK
O
P
K
E
K
>>341946536
Shit, forgot that was still a sensitive topic for you Sorry.
>>341946275
I've literally got the game open right now. R2 is used to swing, L2 is used to sprint/boost. What the fuck are you talking about?
>>341946536
That doesn't make its mention shitposting or anything of the like.
>>341946791
Even the mere uttering of the word is a thread destroyer
>>341941787
Obligatory post
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pOU6HVSL6a8
>SO ARE YOU.
I hope that it will look like that in the final product
>>341945163
You deserved it.Good night.
>>341946546
>little shits STILL don't understand that the publisher is Sony
>Sony also owns the rights to Spiderman
>>341936915
I was not expecting this, so I wasn't very critical at the time, but this footage looks fake as fuck.
>>341946791
Use some logic here anon, if I didn't have a PS4 then why would I be in a thread about a Sony exclusive? Silly dumb shitposter.
>>341946875
Except it does because it has nothing to do with this thread.
>>341946907
Not really. Stop being so sensitive.
>>341946979
I still got the game in the end
>>341947084
>if I didn't have a PS4 then why would I be in a thread about a Sony exclusive?
Same reason why buttmad PCucks were in Bloodborne threads?
>>341947084
No it fucking doesn't. Mentioning an unrelated game is not fucking shitposting. You getting uppity about it and bitching however, is. Just fucking let it go.
>>341946007
How about no?
>>341936915
>>341937220
>>341937630
I expect Ubisoft tier downgrades
>>341936915
Its like Ass Creed when you climb through windows and automatically run out he other side. It won't look anything even close to this. If they had the entire team optimizing for a pair of 1080's there is no way it would look like that.
>>341947332
No everyone is part of your shitposting harem. I came here for Spider-Man but you fucks ruined it, I'm trying again later.
>>341947426
Except it is. Would you like it if I went into one of your Bloodborne threads and started a discussion about Mario? or used your thread to kick start a topic about the new God of War?
Fuck no you wouldn't you would start shitposting it to hell and back so don't sit there and say it's ok.
>>341947332
>were
They still are, actually.
>>341937185
Came here to post this
>>341936915
-0.999
it will be downgrade on release into empty office
>>341947613
>hmph! Im leaving!Okay, take your ball and go home
>>341947613
It's not shitposting to mention an unrelated game, stop being stupid. And no, nobody would care if you mentioned other games in a themed thread so long as you didn't force it into every conversation. Nobody was doing that with Bloodborne, it was literally brought up because it was related to the subject of the Spiderman game's exclusivity.
>>341936915
1. There will be downgrades
2. The movement in the coffee shop will be an Assassin's Creed style "hold button to do le parkour" and will probably be grossly simplified by release. The movement is far too fluid to be completely player controlled
>>341938238
>buying the same console again
Are people really this deluded?
>>341947949
If it's "Press R2 and hold the stick", that's good enough. Not like you can make anything more intricate to make each and every movement in the shop playable.
And this is Insomniac, they rarely ever downgrade their games visually.
>>341947047
>Sony also owns the rights to Spiderman
Marvel owns the character. Sony owns the movie rights. There has been nothing to say sony has exclusive rights to videogames of spider-man.
>>341945602
This. Their next reveal needs to be a single video showing all the swing mechanics and reassuring everyone that its solid before they begin teasing villains and the actual game.
>>341945702
i think the ASM2 game did that. While i hated it i think its a neat idea that allows you to choose your side and then angle your arc to turn. Turning right from a web attached to the left side just doesnt work and when you make it automatic its just not as good.
>>341945758
filenmame thread
>>341946007
why dont we add sixaxis motion controls too!
>>341948252
not that crazy to think it came with part of the movie deal. They let them use him in the movies because lord knows it makes money and sony gets a slice of the pie plus get to have his games on their console only
>>341948495
But Insomniac did good with those before.
>>341948648
as long as its optional
>>341946546
>Shit on PS4 when it has "no games"
>Shit on PS4 for "stealing" exclusives
>>341948728
They usually do that with their controls.
>>341948137
first console. Im a pc only guy currently
8, that scene wasn't particularly impressive
>>341948738
Nobody outside of /v/ believes in the whole "no games" meme, though.
>>341948814
Didnt know this. Pleasantly surprised
>>341948927
Yea, in the first PS3 R&C game, they had the option to enable/disable the sixaxis controls for things like the hacking device and tornado launcher.
>>341936915
More than likely going to be a QTE.
>>341948638
>hey let them use him in the movies because lord knows it makes money and sony gets a slice of the pie
Sony gets marvel to help them with their spider-man movies. Sony doesn't get any money from spider-man being in marvel movies and marvel doesn't get any from new spider-man movies.
http://variety.com/2015/film/news/details-spider-man-appear-in-sony-and-marvel-movies-1201429039/
As far as the videogame exclusivity it's pure speculation right now. But yeah it's possible. But then is anything.
looks like a dope game, but if it's not 60fps, by interest will drop immediately
>>341949997
Why should that matter? Long as it's stable, it's all the same.
I don't even give a shit about Spiderman but Spiderman 2 on PS2 was one of the best games I played in the 2000s
If this game can be half of what that game was it'll be a success and warrant my purchase of a PS4
>>341950118
it's not though, 60 fps is obviously more visually fluid but it makes controls more responsive
>>341950157
It'll be interesting to see if Insomniac can manage, since they've never really done a melee intensive game, much less one with a lot of mobility like Spiderman.
>>341944356
I never got the difference between 60fps and 30fps and why it seems to be something everyone loves to bring up as a dealbreaker
>>341950597
it means faster response time and more fluid motion/control. anything with any intensity benefits from running at 60, but there are a lot of games that are just fine at 30.
>>341950230
30fps can be pretty fluid too when it's done right.
>>341950597
that's just means you are ignorant and that's fine and all to have low standards but my standards are high. High enough that it can ruin experiences
I wish I was ignorant to fps, v-sync, resolution and frame timing, I could just imbibe garbage all day
>>341950324
Who knows, if it's shit I can just play Spiderman 2 again, and if it isn't, I get to play a new version of it.
At least there's a few other games on PS4 I'm looking forward to so this one being bad won't make me feel like a complete idiot for buying one.
>>341950736
maybe if the frame timing is perfect, but it still wouldnt hold a candle to 60fps
>>341950597
There are some fluidity differences, but it really depends from person to person if that difference affects them.
>>341936915
Stop it.
I don't want to be disappointed, again.
>>341950797
have you played spiderman 2 recently? aside from the swinging, the game is terrible
>>341950839
No, with good frame timing the difference between 30 and 60 is literally personal preference.
>>341950773
2/10
>>341950964
no it isnt because of the responsiveness of the controls, there are more frames meaning the controls respond more making the experience better
>>341936915
>wow look at that coffee shop scene! there's no way that it's actual gameplay!
retards, look at how he jumps to and from each table, onto the wall etc. obviously the player is able to control what he jumps onto, but the game is literally making him "jump/stick" to the next object in an "on-rails" sort of way. you can't stop jumping around, and just casually walk around the interior - but most likely you can hesitate to jump to the next table or whatever and hang out there.
>>341950597
When you've played games from generation to generation, as a kid you just played, but when the standards move up it's hard to go back to something that's lower than a standard, Example playing Turok/ 2 on OG 64
>>341948895
Then that post still applies to /v/
>tfw cant get hype because the footage was so obviously going to be downgraded
>tfw cant get hype because its insomniac who recently released this legendary game right here
>>341951058
Except that's not true for every game. Some suffer from being 60fps.
>>341951185
That's only true for turn based games or games that have limiting controls, even though there is a benefit from visual fluidity
Specifically to spiderman, the only game we are talking about, yes the game would be a lot better if the fps is 60
>>341951358
Maybe it would.
>>341950964
literally just personal preference... literally if you prefer the better or worse experience, lmao.
>>341936915
cutscene transition into gameplay/10
>>341951721
>and then there's this asshole
>>341951125
sounds like a shitty QTE
I was excited for this game, now it's starting to sound like shit
>>341950773
what's the point of having high standards if you are going to complain about everything and act like a faggot who doesn't enjoy anything?
serious question tho
>>341951880
What do you want? You can't expect to control every little leap and bound and so on with something like a hectic run through a shop.
>>341952017
then do something else that would enhance the gameplay
>>341939368
Ultimate does, yes.I started replaying it this week due to hype
>>341951921
it's like this
you eat a shit sandwhich and you are completely fine with it or I would have a steak dinner but the steak is cooked well done
I have higher standards than you but since you are ignorant of something better, you are fine
>>341952080
Such as? There's no other way to move in that shop beyond the Ass Creed like movement most are assuming.
>>341950936
I never did anything in the game except swing around anyways, that's the only appeal of any of them to me.
>>341952287
Game developer is not my fucking occupation, take out the shop and put something else in or something that seems less shit
>>341952248
>your tastes are like shit
And opinion discarded. So cute how people like you are this delusional.
>>341952392
That's just stupid. The shop bit will be fine so long as you can have some input in it.
>>341952394
you didnt even read my post, I wasnt calling your tastes shit, it was just a comparison
it could've been anything else
the point of my post was saying that my standards are higher but you are fine with worse experiences
>>341952474
according to what you believe the controls of the shop sequence will be, it barely has input at all; very comparable to a QTE
instead of that, implement something more based on gameplay
>>341944957
>>341945289
Better than listening to Donatello again.
>>341952589
>my standards are higher
Your delusions are higher, that's for sure.
>>341952713
Being able to move yourself in any any direction while the game handles the acrobatics is plenty gameplay.
>>341952745
If I believe 4K is better than 1080p and 60fps is better than 30fps and I am not fine with an experience that has both 1080p 30fps but you are, then yes, my standards are higher
>>341952743
When was Spiderman voiced by a Turtle VA?
>>341936915
If by gameplay you mean a scene where the game restricts all other interaction other than tilting an analog stick forward and tapping X---I'd say pretty damn high. Looks too scripted to be honest moment-to-moment gameplay.
>>341952886
Enjoy having no fun in life.
>>341952824
alright man, I just want to play a game, not watch the game play itself
I mean, whatever floats your boat
>>341946007
That's stupid. You're stupid. Go back to stupid town.
>>341953005
You'd still be playing if the presumed controls are used.
>>341952996
that was literally my entire point
>>341936915
It's just a QTE with the prompts removed for the video. Screencap this.
>>341953090
nah, I wouldn't play games in which I perceive to have shit controls or in the case of spideman, limited control
>>341953101
Except I am having fun because I'm not limiting my horizons.
STOLE THAT GUY'S PIZZA
>>341953234
Again, you are just restating my point, stop replying
>>341953227
That's not limited control, though.
>>341953316
I'm not, I'm refuting your bullshit.
>>341953319
If the game is controlling itself and you are literally just choosing a direction in an action game
yeah, that is limiting
>>341937220
Can't wait for the downgrade footage
>>341952915
The Amazing games.
>>341948137
Jokes on you Sonycuck
I didn't buy any first round consoles because I knew this was going to happen.
Oh no
Dr. Connor's class
>>341953463
Except it isn't. It's just the game making sure you don't bump around like a retard on skates.
It's no different from a character automatically clambering over obstacles while you're running instead of having to stop and press a button to climb over every hurdle.
>>341953407
restating my original point back to me is not refuting anything, you are just wasting my time and we shouldn't be having this conversation
this series of posts will not go anywhere because you refuse to understand so I'm not going to bother posting a reply after this and should shouldn't either
>>341937746
I see no difference
>>341953669
I did not once restate your bullshit.
>>341953602
The difference being is one is an "action" sequence of the game
come on anon, you are smarter than this
>>341936915
Why is spiderman such an asshole?
>>341953806
Except it's likely to be one of many possible actions you can take to make missions and chases more exciting. That's hardly a bad thing that the game will let you ineract with interiors. Hell, people always bitch about NOT being able to go inside buildings.
>>341936915
QTES are gameplay
Holding A for Parkour is gameplay
FUCKING IDIOT
This game looks too cinematic for its own good.
>>341953957
>Except it's likely to be one of many possible actions you can take to make missions and chases more exciting
you dont know that
>That's hardly a bad thing that the game will let you ineract with interiors.
that's not the point at all
>>341953542
Jokes on you they'll just release a new one two years later
>>341939780
Why isn't web of shadows on this?
>>341939780
>no mention of Web of Shadows
F
uck this autistic shithead
>>341954101
It's highly unlikely to be a single moment that you'll only experience in whatever mission that happens in.
The point is that it's gameplay regardless of how dynamic the controls are.
>>341951182
EA meddling man. Remember when it was supposed to be like this?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nxvx9XknhHc
>>341954286
>>341954282
Ayyy, well timed friendo
>>341954294
>It's highly unlikely to be a sing
you dont know that
>>341954294
>The point is that it's gameplay regardless of how dynamic the controls are.
Your point was stating some bullshit about interiors, my point was that it was limiting
you cant even keep your points together
>>341954468
I may not know for sure, but it's more likely you'll be able to run through interiors when you want than just some one-off thing.
And no I didn't lose track of my points. I was still on the point about gameplay and how it isn't limiting.
>>341951182
see
>>341943769 webm
EA my man
Is it too much to ask for some type of dating system as Peter?
>>341954702
Long as it isn't just "Carrying MJ/Gwen around while their VA lazily sounds 'excited'" bullshit again.
>this game won't get shitposted to death and turn into a meme just like bloodborne because it's a solid exclusive title
>we will always be able to have actual threads discussing the game
On a scale from 1-10 how likely is this to be true0
>>341936915
Most likely part of the story mode.
>>341939780
>>341940923
What happened to http://www.indiedb.com/games/guedinaot ?
It was pretty promising. Also that graphic should mention Energy Hook for obvious reasons.
>>341954584
>it's more likely you'll be able
you dont know that
>I was still on the point about gameplay and how it isn't limiting.
yeah okay, so you are implying that if theoretically is there were to be an action sequence that incorporated the player to overcome an obstacle utilizing everything they can in the boundaries of the rules of the game is the equivalent to a QTE like sequence?
that is incredibly fatuous anon and you know this, you are smarter than that
You can tell by the lighting that it's going to be downgraded.
Here's what they do.
They make it look shadowy and beautiful through lighting. Dark but high contrast.
Then the game is brighter, but blander so you can make out objects easier.
Look at every downgrade and tell me this is false.
>>341954941
>you don't know that
Neither do you, saying that doesn't disprove anything.
I never said the sequence would be anything like a QTE. If anyone is losing track of things, it's you.
>>341940923
and the new one being made uses those same mechanics.
>>341954989
What other downgrades?
>>341954068
>press X to win is gameplay
look how far weve fallen
>>341955101
>Neither do you
I never said anything that I implied that I did, I am going by what you believe the gameplay would be in the original post
>but the game is literally making him "jump/stick" to the next object in an "on-rails" sort of way. you can't stop jumping around, and just casually walk around the interior - but most likely you can hesitate to jump to the next table or whatever and hang out there.
sounds like a QTE-like sequence, either way not fun
I'd like it if there was a button to trigger agile running, where you automatically hop over things like in Prototype or Ass Creed
I'd also like it if the webs were as versatile as grappling hooks in the Just Cause games
>>341955362
I didn't say that at all.
I said that you'd press the stick and maybe a button, while the game merely handles the trickier things like Spidey nimbly jumping over whatever object is in his way or clinging/climbing around it. That in no way sounds like a QTE. QTEs, by definition, have to be consecutive button presses like "X, Square, O" and so on while the game either does a shoddy slow-mo effect or clips between obvious cutscenes.
>>341955672
>I didn't say that at all.
I literally copied and pasted from your original post
>>341955772
That wasn't my post.
>>341955884
Then why are we having this conversation
>>341943793
remember from where? Seriously
>>341943984
Wasn't joking.
>>341941787
haha so funny XD
fuck off
>>341955628
web zip has always been a simple quick hook type launch but a hold to aim and then propel feature while retaining the quick tap and zip would be sweet. Combine this with fluid free running type stuff like you mentioned and youve have greatshort distance movement.
Im not worried about the webswinging, its almost impossible that a game this big will fuck it up so spideys long distance movement is set. His running around, hopping over small houses and stuff has always been kinda clunky
>>341955959
Because you literally mixed up my post with someone else's late into the discussion.
>>341937185
This. It's in engine but by no means not a cutscene
>>341936915
It's probably like ninja run in MGR where you just hold button to awesome.
>>341956058
I didnt and only replied to you because you were replying to me
either way I'm not replying anymore and you should do the same
>>341956042
I don't mean mobility specifically, I also meant all the fun of hooking cars to the ground, people to walls, people to cars, etc.
If the webs are a dynamic weapon rather than a simple web shot or channeled cocoon move, I'm gonna buy a PS4 for this.
>>341956181
Except you did. That wasn't my post you quoted. That was an entirely different person.
>>341956290
listen, I understand that you dislike being wrong, but there are times in which we have to just stop.
>>341937739
I don't see the big fuss between 60 and 30. Sure,60 is far better but I get used to playing on 30 after about 10 minutes.
>>341956264
ahh i see what you mean. That would be neat to create clothes lines across buildings, tie people to poles and other creative stuff for the webs outside movement
Im already buying a ps4 for this game when they show web swinging is anchored and physics based, this stuff would make go preorder
>>341947492
nope
>>341956445
>being wrong
About what? I didn't say anything about on-rails once. There's no shame in admitting you mistook me for that other guy.
>>341948252
Nope. Sony owns Spiderman. They made a deal with Marvel. Spiderman gets to be in Avengers, which is something Marvel has REALLY wanted to do, but Sony keeps the rights and keeps making Spiderman movies. The catch is that Sony doesn't get money from Avengers appearances and Marvel doesn't get money from the Spiderman movies.
>>341956639
Ratchet and Clank looked beautiful.
I have high hopes
>>341956995
yap
>>341957075
Elaris was better.
>>341957136
>>341956445
Only one wrong here is you, bucko. You got two people mixed up.
>>341936915
>>341937185
This.
Theres probably just going to be a "free run" button or similar that's going to let you do obstacle traversal.
>>341956885
See >>341949476
Sony has never owned spider-man. Just the movie rights. Stop being retarded.
>>341956885
Sony does not own Spider-Man they simply have movie rights. Marvel owns Spider-Man.
The same way fox has movie rights to x-men an fantastic 4 but the characters belong to Marvel.
>>341957203
That's funny I literally just got to this part not 30 minutes ago.
>>341936915
I could it working like this. It'll be the analog stick and a face button, the latter being what makes Spiderman run and jump about all willy nilly, but the objects he'll focus on will be affected by both the movement stick AND the camera, I guess you could say sort of like how the glory kills in Doom are affected by where the camera is facing on an enemy.
So maybe you could through a different window if you turn the camera towards it.
>>341957136
MJ, Gwen, and Felicia, if in the game, are going to be top tier waifus
>>341958334
If they're aren't ugly monsters like in Web of Shadows.
>>341957432
Why must rights for properties be so retardedly complex?
>>341958405
I don't think I had any problems with Felicia is WoS. It is been a while since I played it though.
>>341958897
She was ok, but god did MJ look horrid. Of course, the whole game felt like someone took a PS2 game and lazily upscaled it.
So what costumes should be in the game?
I just hope they actually would have distinctions for once, all the other games just make a cosmetic change with little to no gameplay change.
>>341959664
Like, most of Spideys are kinda samey, unless you go symbiotes. I guess you can hope for the gliding of Miguel suit or Doc Ock spider legs.
>>341960279
Except that's not true. Plenty of the suits have differences. Some have camouflage, the doc oc legs, organic webbing (if going by either symbiot, Raimi films, or the times Spidey gets additional spider powers), some are straight up armors. Hell, they could even do things like "costumes" where you can be six-arm Spiderman, perhaps with an unlockable Man-Spider form. There's a lot of potential, if done right.
>>341960549
Like you said some have extras but the core powers of Spideys are still the same.
>>341960710
Pretty sure the ones that used tech weren't nearly as nimble since they were pretty much relying on gadgetry to do shit for them like lazy shits. At least that Ironman man like one from the finale arc of the 90s series was pretty fucking lazy.
>>341937078
That looks too good to be true
>>341959664
Black suit.
Iron Spider.
Noir.
Original.
Stealth suit.
>>341959664
I always use the peter parker skin when it's available
Post costumes you want to see in the game
>>341960938
The graphics or pedestrian/car count?
I'm willing to think at least one will be accurate enough. And really, I'd be fine if it was the car and peds since it'd be nice to see a lively city even if the graphics aren't making the PS4 sweat tears.
>>341936915
2/10
4. Barring Zelda, though, this was my favorite game at E3 and might be an exclusive worth getting the PS4 for. Well, that in addition to the one or two games already exist.
>>341961186
Fear suit, plus my post >>341960948
>>341958876
It's not. People are just easily confused.
>>341961429
It is though. IPs should just be all inclusive, not split up into so many fucking different things like tv rights, movie rights, sock rights, and anal plug rights.
>>341961514
The hell is that white haired Inuyasha looking motherfucker?
>>341961186
Spider-Gwen and Mayday
>>341961514
Carnage Spider hell yeah!
>>341961345
>Cosmic
>Ricochet
>2099
>FUCKING NOIR
Please tell me that game is good.
Amazing Bag Man or Riot
>>341961903
It's okay. Pick it up for $5-%10 or pirate.
>>341961623
All ips are spit like that during licensing. Some times sold. Not one company could produce everything and really it's has no barring on you.
>>341961728
Izumi from Spider-man Fairy Tales 03.
>>341962384
Disney easily produces everything with the shit it owns, and so can others by subcontracting for whatever products they want. The splits are just stupid and make things too complicated.
>>341962558
They couldn't subcontract anyway because Marvel never had the money. They only sold the movie rights because at the time they were going down the shitter.
>>341962558
Nigga, Marvel IPs falling into the others hand are way before Disney.
>>341962705
Never said anything like they weren't. The point remains that IPs having all these sudsidiaries is just stupid and leads to this kind of horseshit where Sony can sit their fat ass on one thing for years.
>>341961751
>Spider-Gwen
Why would they make a female skin for Peter?
>>341962897
Because equality meme.
>>341962861
You do realize without this kind of things Marvel would die long before they were bought by Disney, right?
>>341962861
Sony has been making the spider-man movies for years now. They haven't sat on anything. You seem ill informed.
>>341961903
pirate, its shit
>>341963029
No they wouldn't, they still have the comics and the cartoons they ordered to be made over the years.
>>341963079
And yet they've been failing quite badly. The fact that in less than 20 years, they've rebooted the same franchise THREE times doesn't exactly mean they've been using the license well.
>>341963516
>ctrl + f
>0 results
Literally no one.
>>341963516
>that feel when some faggot in spandex plasters his image over your own
Raziel will reave your shit!
>>341936915
going to be QTE: The Game, the umpteenth of its kind.
Its not that past games weren't loaded with it, but this seems like it will pull no quick time punch
>>341963802
name 3 games
a pre-setpiece sure
a random event that happens when you go through it?
No
They obviously dolled it up with npcs and set them to all react and have it look cool, but you'll never get this to happen in real gameplay, unless it's a scripted event.
>>341937746
i know its downgraded but cmon, At least the cunt could have done a fair comparison by sailing in a storm
>>341936915
how old are you?
>>341964001
how do you know
>>341964001
Why not? They could easily make it that you could run through the window of any shop and back out in a similar manner. Hell, maybe if you linger people will react differently. One NPC might freak out about the window breaking, while others might go "Oh cool, Spidey's here!"
>>341963378
Jesus you are ignorant. Marvel went bankrupt in 99 and had no money.
>>341936915
>Press X to coffee shop
>>341936915
so... am I supposed to be impressed? it could as well be a QTE or just a really animated walk with obstacles, this helps gameplay in no way other than to try and make it look cool
>>341964161
They didn't, otherwise they wouldn't be around, dipshit. They lost out on some grounds, but not everything.
>>341964202
cry more
>>341964119
>>341964132
They could do that but they won't
if they do it, it will be the only area in the gamewhich would look weird. Theres no way this will actually happen outside of a story based chase scene.
This shit is demo bait that they make to trick you into thinking the game will be this good. They doll up one area and it's probably playable but in no way a reliable example of the final product.
Every modern western game does this.
Sometimes they even leave the demo level in the game and it feels incredibly out of place in quality.
>>341964257
What's wrong with the game making it look cool? Not like there'd be any way to make it all controlled by the player for every single leap, climb, and cling.
>>341964371
i love this meme and looks like you didnt play ratchet and clank fuck off
>>341964275
You seem to understand bankruptcy as much as you do licensing.
http://articles.latimes.com/1996-12-28/business/fi-13242_1_marvel-stock
>>341964371
That's a lot of assumption. This is Insomniac, they aren't cheapskates like Bioware or Bethesda who cut corners like they're playing with playdoh. They could easily make a number of shops around the streets of the city be interactable, with different ways to get through them and be used when in pursuit of an enemy. The question is how would you go through them control-wise. And the likely answer is something like an Ass Creed run where the game handles delicate stuff like looking Spiderman and not a costumed sperg bumbling through a room.
Worst case scenario, it could become repetitive if criminals spawn on the same street and always follow the same path, thus going through whatever shop is on that street.
>>341964594
They didn't go under, which is what it usually means when you say bankrupt you retarded fuck. And there's still no purpose in having rights for everything from toothpicks to goddamn sleeveless shirts when the shit just makes it difficult for people to do anything effective with other rights because they need another part just to get something in mind done.
Fucking idiot.
>>341964520
Only one of them, but I'm not entirely sure what that game has to do with an open world spidey man.
Look heres what I see that tells me it's a bullshot.
1. Npcs reacting to what you're doing
2. Multiple npcs inside a building
3. Physics that works
4. multiple sources of high quality light
At best this is going to a be a thing you run through and repeat the same animation every time you do it.
I understand imsomniac has a record, but this just isn't feesable in anyway.
>>341964402
>>341964387
There is no purpose to this, its only to wow people.
>>341964860
>And there's still no purpose in having rights for everything from toothpicks to goddamn sleeveless shirts when the shit just makes it difficult for people to do anything effective with other rights because they need another part just to get something in mind done.
They own the rights everything to do with spider-man but the movies rights. Marvel doesn't have a problem there.
>>341959664
Zombie Spiderman with cannibal perk
As long as it has incredible webslinging and a vast open world, I could probably play it for hours.
>>341965142
ok
>>341950118
>it's all the same
>one has literally twice as many frames of animation
What DID he mean by this?
>>341965010
How is NPCs reacting faked? Tons of games have it, fucking GTAV has it when you do shit.
Multiple NPCs, while an understanding doubt, isn't completely unlikely if the developer knows how to work the system to render these things.
Physics working has been a thing in many games, not like it's some improbable feat yet to be achieved by any game.
High quality lighting isn't that hard when the developers aren't drooling retards who can't make a tree without it having the physics of a paper cup.
>>341965213
That'd be easy to mod.Fuck just realised its ps4 only.Ehh theres always the next game.
I'm still hype for this game
>>341965142
So just because you aren't retardedly pressing 12 button for each of the limbs Spidey uses to run through the cafe, it's just "crap to wow people"?
OKAY. Whatever you say.
>>341936915
i don't like white symbol
>>341965446
Why not?
>>341965331
There's hardly any difference, faggot.
Did anybody else notice the choppiness in the trailer?
Definitely getting downgraded.
>>341964860
>>They didn't go under, which is what it usually means when you say bankrupt you retarded fuck
Don't blame other people because you're ignorant.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chapter_11,_Title_11,_United_States_Code#Chapter_11_in_general
Think we'll see venom sing?
>>341966143
It's not ignorance you dumb fuck. They literally didn't go under, they just had to get a bailout. That's not the same thing as actually closing its door and dying.
>>341966309
I see you can't read. Plenty of sties say your wrong there.
http://www.nytimes.com/1997/07/11/business/marvel-reaches-agreement-to-emerge-from-bankruptcy.html
>>341939780
PC Spiderman the movie 2 in the trash
Man, i can't tell you how dissapointed i was when my dad gifted me that game for my birthday.
>>341966507
Stil doesn't say they were dead and gone, you illiterate fuckstain.
>>341961345
>spider-carnage
Absolutely wonderful
>>341966660
Bankruptcy doesn't mean dead and gone. That's all assumptions on your part. It's been shown it has more uses.
>>341966776
And yet you keep responding like it does. just fuck off already.
>>341966834
Friend your the one who though that. I was explaining it wasn't. Also it's now shown clearly that marvel had money problems.
>>341937220
imagine GTA VI with these visuals
>>341966976
No, I said they weren't gone and you kept posting shit and acting like Marvel was out of the game.
>>341966973
nice tears
>>341936915
>accelerates mid-air when going through the glass
What is he? Superman?
Insomniac learned a lot about traversal animation with Sunset Overdrive, so I'd believe it.
>>341967238
You can see the webs he slings before shooting through the window.
>>341966776
We better get funny Venom. Hell, I'd love a team-up mission with Venom.
>>341961345
>Iron Spider
>no mecha legs
Fuck you
>>341967108
No you assumed that Bankruptcy means dead and gone and thought I was auguring that instead of the fact they filled chapter 11 and when doing bad. It's alright. I already posted the sites that say they went bankrupt. The proof is there.
>>341967474
Who should play him? Hank Azaria was pretty good, but I liked the way the guy who played him in Spectacular did the voice.
Of course, it does beg the question of WHICH Venom it should be. Would be cool to see the OG, meaning Secret Wars, then Brock getting the hump and dumped suit instead of the biosuit crap or "it conveniently hitchhiked to earth on a rocket"
>>341967638
I said they weren't dead and gone, you kept posting like they were.
>>341936915
I wonder if this suit will be upgradeable
>>341967742
I'm sorry you got confused. But at least you learned some new terms and some history.
>>341967849
There'll probably be some upgrades for the abilities. I just hope the combat is simple, but with some complexity. Most of the game were either just basic punching shit, or overly complex shit like SM2 which made pulling off most moves impossible.
>>341967929
Yea whatever, keep talking out your ass, bub.
>>341967761
I don't think I've ever seen Spidey use his web as a parachute before.
>>341967956
So you want the combat to be like web of shadows? I'd be fine with that
>>341968150
He's had a lot more uses for webs in the comics than the cartoons or films ever give credit. Hell, I think only like two cartoons have even done any of the creative web based gadgets.
>>341968028
Well typing at any event. No speech to text for me.
I thought it was pretty good but,
>that voice acting
Absolutely horrific.
>>341968357
Eh, not quite. That stuff seemed really floaty. Some people have discussed combat not unlike the Arkham games, which wouldn't be too out of place since at least Spiderman can be seen zipping around like he's tethering everyone together compared to Batman who would sometimes do a levitating powerslide across the ground to smack a thug 10 blocks down the road from him.
>>341968537
>I'm gonna have to break Tinkerer out of jail
>Yea huh
>You know, break the law!
>Yea
Seriously, I think only Electro and Wolverine were the only decent VAs.
>>341968537
haven't played it since i was a kid, but i remember it being the only spider-man game that actually felt like it took place in the marvel universe. I liked the world building it did
>>341968537
I liked you had some choice in the story and the villain assists. Also the wall combat.
>>341968423
I don't think I've seen that much from the games either.
>>341968537
This game had potential, too bad there won't be a sequel to this
>>341968537
Still my go to when I felt like playing Spider-man game.
>>341967673
Sadly, if they're doing Yuri for Pete, they'll prolly choose someone new.
>>341968551
I see, just have hope on insomniac I know they'll get it right
>>341968904
If they use Yuri, the union would make them use the rest of their "professionals".
>>341937739
who cares if it's 30fps? If it's solid, butter smooth 30FPS it is completely fine.
PS4 exclusives prioritizes making fun games anyways, and also has the best looking games ever created too.
>>341969446
>>who cares if it's 30fps?
He does.
>>341950597
If you have only played 30 fps its hard to explain the difference, but spending the last 2 gens playing pretty much only 60, 30 fps can be damn near unplayable especially for fighting games.
60 is just a lot smoother and 30 is like the lowest you can get without the game just being a slideshow.
>>341967632
Despite how cool that would have been, I doubt the devs would have taken the time to do that for a movie tie in game.
>Everyone talking about muh swinging
Honestly, does't bother me too much although I 100% Ultimate and 2.
Instead, let's talk about what also made them fun: Side Quests. Kinda like the ones in Arkham but they got that from SM 2 anyways.
>Black Cat Roof top chases
No swinging allowed whee you chase Black Cat's sexy glistening ass in the moonlight.
>Ironman tech races
Like the Johnny Storm one's only with Ironman who's more known these days, odd as it is to say. You just have a race, rings and all.
Finishing all unlocks the Iron Spider suit.
>Spider Wars sidequest
Even if the actual event was shit, I think it could still be used.
Randomly, you'll notice random spidermen pop-up in hidden places in New York. You go to them, do a mission, and then get their suit. Final boss is Morlun who'd be like Sephirpth from KH, optional but OP. Unlocks the Superior suit and the Other ability, can use stings and web becomes unlimited.
>Daily Bugle Hub
You can take photos, send it to Jameson, and get money sorta like in 2. Bonus for taking pics of villians.
This is done by submitting it to Jameson himself in the Daily Bugle as Peter. Main one's lioe villians will be for Jameson but Betty may mask for smaller ones (robberies, pics from high places, etc.) which are randomly generated.
A lot of easter eggs can also be seen in the Bugle through headlines and stuff that refer to other Marvel heroes.
>Sinister Six
There's no doubt these guys will be bosses but it'd be cool if you could fight them again as randomly generated crimes after they've been defeated initially.
May eventually lead to a 6 on 1 battle vs. Spidey.
>Xmen sidequest
If there's one side of Marvel, Spidey feels better with it's the X-Men for me.
I kinda want a sidequest involving Wolverine, and Kitty. Don't really know what could happen but it could be fun.
>>341961751
I've heard a lot about Spider-Gwen, is it any good? Or is it SJW trash like a lot of Marvel stuff now?
>>341970662
Well we got green goblin to be playable the in the 2002 movie game. He had his gilder and everything.
>>341969446
>this entire post
Honestly can't tell if a shill, troll or obnoxious fanboy. Well done.
>>341970762
>Kitty
Fuck yeah, they were awesome together in Ultimate. I would say out of MJ, Gwen, and Felicia she's the love interest that's had the most chemistry with him. I'd love for her to break back into Spider-Man media.
>>341970786
It's incredibly meh.
Read The superior Foes of Spiderman instead if you want to red something good.
>>341970790
But that was a tie in for a good movie
>>341970829:^)
>>341970762
>Finishing all unlocks the Iron Spider suit.
This is what we need. Suits and shit to be locked behind relevant quests. Beating johnny storm in all of his races should get you the amazing bagman suit etc
Enough of this shit where suits are tied to things like game progression where randomly hitting 75% of the game after picking up a token unlocks a suit.
If you want to make the stuff inaccessible from within the first hour you can simply up the difficulty so that we wont have every suit within seconds. The final races could require full upgrades of the swinging skill tree
>>341942407
It IS ganeplay indeed. To jump on the table you press X, then you press XX to jump against and away from the wall and on the Table he presses X and then Square because the window breaking can be used as attack on enemies too. I hope I did clear some things up.
>>341970762
>Even if the actual event was shit, I think it could still be used.
Absolutely desu. The concept is really good.
>>341936915
Needs more details. They claim that what they'll be focusing on this time will not only be Spider-man's activities, but also Peter Parker's.
My guess? It's one of the scripted animations of sudden changing into Spider-man's costume and jumping into action. I just hope it's not the only one.
>>341971987
>They claim that what they'll be focusing on this time will not only be Spider-man's activities, but also Peter Parker's.
Is this from that marvel guy? That dude was fucking insufferable and i wanted to gouge my eyes out when he talked
>sonyggers actually think this is gameplay and wont get downgraded
>>341972158
They also think it'll stay an exclusive.
Let them have it for a while.
>>341956639
>>341956995
>remake and cuck
>good graphics
>>341968028
>bub
Don't you need to pick up some milk bags?
![Spider-Man-Identity_Crisis[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/LdQNL3a.jpg "Spider-Man-Identity Crisis[1]")
![latest[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/GGkM39m.jpg "latest[1]")
