So what's the /v/erdict?
>>341803387
what's the price of each of them?
>>341803840
The RX480 is supposed to be $199 for the 4gb and I think $40 - $50 more for the 8gb.
RX470 is probably around $150
Gtx 1080 is about $700 and up
gtx 1070 is about $500
The rx460 I don't know, but it's probably some cheap shit.
>>341804267
wow the 480 is surprisingly cheap
>>341804267
>Gtx 1080 is about $700 and up
that was the founders shit
WCCFTECH is RUN BY POOINLOOS AND SUB 70IQ MUSLIMS
DO NOT POST ANY INFO HOSTED ON THEIR WEBSITE
>>341803387
i can't decide if the 1080 is worth the extra ~200 over the 1070
help me family
>>341804579
Yes, and assuming it's not shit when it comes out, it will be the best bang for your bucks. And if that poll is any indication of how good is going to sell, it should be a motivation for nvdia to start lowering prices to be competitive so either way we win.
Finally upgrading my 680. By the way, I'm selling my 680!
>>341804858
No helping nvidiots. kys
>>341804858
are you planning to play on higher than 1080p? Then it's worth it, if not, don't buy it.
>>341804659
Then what's the price? Im' going by google and evga website.
I already got a 1070 because I have a 1440p 144hz monitor.
>>341803387
I have a 980ti
short of catastrophe, I'm good for this cycle
>>341804858
>buy 1080
>dont need a new video card for years unless you want to stay on the cutting edge of VR tech or are some sort of graphicsfag who cannot play a game unless it is on absolute maximum settings at all times, at 60fps
seems like a pretty simple solution
I have a 390.
A $200 moderate upgrade wouldn't be worth it unless I can get $100+ for my current card.
1070 is more than I want to spend right now especially with the price as inflated as it is right now.
480 and I'm getting an Intel CPU
sick of this 6350
>>341805371
>at 60fps
Let's be real, graphics snobs have moved onto 144fps being the standard they don't want to drop below.
What do you think the performance of the RX480 will be on 2560 x 1080?no bully
>>341803387
1080 and 1070 are 100% going to have price cut after the 480's come out too
>>341803387
I'm getting a terrible feeling about the 480. Nothing is ever that good. 970 was a 3.5 meme of dissapointment.
>>341805091
>i deliberately buy faulty pieces of shit with planned obsolescence
lmao good little cucked faggot
now fuck off retard
>>341804267
>The RX480 is supposed to be $199 for the 4gb and I think $40 - $50 more for the 8gb.
The 8GB version costs $229
>>341803387
What are the chances I regret buying any of the them?
Nvidia cards suck in DX12 games, I.E on every console port yet to come, and Halo Wars 2, a game I actually do care about.
AMD is same old story, raw power and cherry picked benchmarks will show that is a great card. Reality will be vastly different, performing better or worse than a GTX 970.
I currently have a GTX 970 and plan on holding on to it since I don't really need a better card right now. I do absolutely love the Rx480 great price, and it's great for PC gaming a whole.
>>341805610
what's the point of such a small price difference, most people will buy the 8gb, right?
>>341805371
>dont need a new video card for years unless you want to stay on the cutting edge of VR tech or are some sort of graphicsfag who cannot play a game unless it is on absolute maximum settings at all times, at 60fps
>This is me
>>341805710
I don't know. If I had the money I wouldn't think about it twice and get me a 980, or 1080 but unfortunately, I have to work for living and already need an upgrade so I'm hoping that RX480 is not a total let down.
>>341805596
you mean you buy any product made after the industrial revolution?
Nvidia cards have planned obsolescence too. They could release them every 4 years and always have an architecture change instead of making making them have more memory or be slightly more efficient every year.
You are now aware that you are wasting your days on 4chan, posting about videogames and other pointless entertainment that you consume to fill the void inside you. Then you get older, sick and die.
>>341807320
i enjoy it right now
>>341805538
the 8gb version should do well
>>341803387
Games are still going to be optimized for Nvida as a priority with AMD as a distant after though. AMD's specs don't matter
>poorfags
>>341807650
We're just ieet.
>>341807575
SFV runs in 21:9 ?
>>341808019
not really, some guy took pics of the game using supersampling.
>>341803387
>have 780ti
>starting to be a problem
>480 has amazing price point
>can add another later easily
should I do it?
>>341804858
Wait for the 1080ti. And then when it comes out don't buy it and wait for Volta to buy that generations flagship.
On a serious note, if you don't live in a shithole country, buy from EVGA, they have a program that takes your old gpu and give you a serious discount for a new one.
Leaning towards a 1070 to upgrade from a 660 ti, but mostly cause the one AMD card I had I had nothing but issues with it. Probably was more due to the manufacturer than anything, but I don't really want to take another chance with that nonsense.
>>341803387
The fuck is that pic even from that makes it even relevant to begin with?
>>341803387
>Vertict
/v/ is full of poor fags.
That is all.
>>341803387
waiting for the 1080ti.
Going to build a true 4k build
Already bought the 980, waiting for the inevitable 1380 that now lets you use NVIDIA ass physics which does nothing noticeable but otherwise renders the game unplayable unless you have that generation of card.
>>341804754
http://wccftech.com/about/
Lmao you're not even joking. It's most blatant shilling for Pajeet by Pajeets
>>341805546
Ye that's why it was a bestseller for 2 years while never actually reaching the 3.5gb throttle.
>>341804267
>gtx 1070 is about $500
WTF I HATE NVIDIA NOW!
>>341804267
Anyone who buys the FE is a retard, and the 1070 FE only costs $450, so you're getting gipped if you pay that much for a 1070. $610 and up for a 1080, and $420 and up for a 1070. You're just flat-out lying.
>>341803387
Gonna wait for them to announce the RX 490 and buy it for a new rig i'm going to make
>>341804267
I thought the 1070 was supposed to be ~$349 or so. Are people just hiking the prices up?
>>341816606
Only the founder's edition. He's bullshitting.
>>341816101
There isn't going to be an 490.
>>341817795
485 then?
>>341817795
There most certainly is, it's just going to be launching late 2016/early 2017.
>>341805596
>>i deliberately buy faulty pieces of shit with planned obsolescence
Is this any different from buying products that are later gimped by drivers when the new architecture comes out?
>>341817578
you're delusional if you think the partner cards won't be the same price
I have an EVGA 1070.
Got it up to 2075MHZ stable.
>>341803387
none.
Who's that red girl?
>>341805478
Sell it to me anon.
>>341817578
Man I want to replace my card now I don't want to wait another three months for prices to stabilize. I know the prices for AMD cards will be fucked for months too.
>bought a 960 2gb less than a year ago
>not even mad
>>341804267
No point in getting the 8gb version if you're not going to crossfire. A single 480 wont make use of it.
Getting the 8gb then another down the road at some point is where it's at.
But thats a waste of a money too. Since dual cards always have driver issues with games and buying 2 AMD gpus with their shit drivers is like throwing money to poor people, just pointless.
>>341805508
Well i have a 144hz monitor so why the fuck not
>>341818602
>girl
I will be getting the Gigabyte G1 1080. Good day, faggots
>>341805508
144FPS at 4K isn't happening anytime soon. The standard is still 1080 at 60 or 4k at 30...ish...just like consoles will be haha..
>/v/erdict
Most of the tards here will probably buy Nvidia because the baby shit green matches their RAZER™ mouse.
>>341807091
>>341818021
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O7fA_JC_R5s
I thought this was common knowledge. I guess everyone doesn't know or maybe you're fanboyism is blind as fuck.
>199$ for the 480
>Is more powerful than the titan.
Yeah.. I'm going AMD. Can't be spending 700 fucking dollars on a GPU.
At least now Nvidia is going to be lowering its prices due to competition.
>>341819076
>not having RGB lighting on everything so you can set it to match anything
>>341807091
>>341818021
little faggot AMD shit heads running damage control as they experience buyer's remorse detected lmao.
>>341819287
>480 is now more powerful than a titan
it gets more powerful every time someone mentions it
>>341818776
Getting the 4GB version is just as short sighted as getting the 2GB 380. Games are only going to use more and more vram as time goes on.
>>341803387
Will wait for vega, then decide. Probably wont upgrade as I still dont have a 1440 monitor.
Has Vidya tech caught up with GPUs enough to justify upgrading a 960? Im not very savvy with this shit and have almost no friends, much less any with computer experience.
I have a 980 and I'm sticking with it. Don't plan on going 4k or 144hz anytime soon so no worries.
>>341819470
If he's referring to the original titan he's correct. That thing aged like milk.
>>341803387
Like a smart person Ill wait until all the cards are out and people have been using them for 1-3 months in order for all the issues to be found, as well as taking into account price drops that are going to happen once competition actually starts.
>>341818692
I built my PC with an R7265 and replaced it with a 970 after like a year.
sub-$200 cards are only really worth it if you're content on playing games on normal settings for a while and you don't think you'll ever put more money into your PC
>>341818692
>still using a 760
>perfect time to upgrade
>>341819451
I'm not a little faggot AMD shit head, but I am experiencing buyer's remorse as a result of Nvidia lying about the 970.
Take this company fanboy crap somewhere else, this shit is more pathetic than console wars.
>>341820002
>I'm not a little faggot
come on. don't lie, kid.
>>341818790
can you actually tell the difference between 60 and 144?
kinda scared because if i get used to 144 then 60 will look like shit and 30 will be unplayable
>>341819481
That's true but the 480 won't be able to utilize it. Regardless anyone should get the 8gb version just to pair it with another one down the road.
>>341820176
>can you actually tell the difference between 60 and 144?
So I've never bought a GPU at launch before, do I have to go through some preorder bullshit or should I be able to buy it on release day off Newegg/Amazon?
Also, for regular gaming would you guys reccomend the 4GB or 8GB version? I'm not entirely sure what the extra 4GB does for vidya.
>>341812387
Mirrors Edge Catalyst says hi
>>341820267
>Also, for regular gaming would you guys reccomend the 4GB or 8GB version? I'm not entirely sure what the extra 4GB does for vidya.
At the moment you rarely need more than 4GB
But being futureproof to some extent is always useful, if you can afford it taking the 8GB might be useful in a few years.
>>341803387
Does this mean we're still going to keep getting AMDfags crying about their games not performing well?
>>341819539
You know you don't have to get 144fps to see the sweetness of more hz. you can be 144hz at 60-80fps and it will look great.
>>341803387
How's it compare to 1080?
>>341810445
>he doesn't knew Ruby
>tfw youth/graduate unemployment is so high I can barely pay rent ripping govt. welfare with a job
>tfw running a 2009 i7 870 and a 7870
>>341820385
Lots of games already use in excess of 4GB on higher settings, especially above 1080p.
>>341820595
>especially above 1080p.im only 1080 so i wouldnt know
>>341820394
Really? well fuck my uninformed brain. Problem is though most 144HZ monitors either have pretty bad colours compared to a decent IPS screen like a Dell, or the ones that are great are so fucking expensive that I don't want to bother with them.
>>341820267
Wait for proper benchmarks before buying anything.
>>341820665
>Ones that are great
Not even they're good. Asus has quality problems like horrendous backlight bleed on both TN and IPS. Dell has made their own TN "Gamer" monitor that's supposed to be pretty close to their ultrasharp colors. Not much reviews on it though
>>341820894
Go PLS. It's great.
>>341804659
there is no non founders edition
MSRP is for the other manufacturers like asus, msi, etc
>>341820665
Therese 2 144hz 1ms 1080p monitors on amazon for $180-$210. The colors can be fixed with your video card settings. I just increase my color vibrancy and lower the contrast and gamma bit and it pops real nice. you can upscale your games to 1440p on both graphic venders really no need for 4k monitors..
>>341820267
>So I've never bought a GPU at launch before
ok here's a little tip
See the two fuckers on the top in my picture? They're reference cards. Those things have dogshit cooling and the fan will make plane noise. DO NOT BUY THOSE. That shit is bad enough to throttle even an Nvidia card.
If you're going to buy a card at launch, make sure that it does not look like the two top fuckers right here. Make sure that you buy something that looks like bottom, with at least two fans that look rad as fuck.
People tend to buy reference cards at launch because reference cards are more available than custom ones, at launch. Sometimes you have custom MSI, Asus, Gigabyte, Sapphire (ect) cards available from launch but you still might buy a reference if you're not looking
>Also, for regular gaming would you guys reccomend the 4GB or 8GB version? I'm not entirely sure what the extra 4GB does for vidya.
Go for 8GB if you're the type to buy the latest game and want to play it at absolute max quality. 2016 games have started a trend where they add extra uneeded graphical options just so you can jack off about buying a $1000 card. You usually don't want those but if that interest you go for the 8GB. You also might want to futureproof because god knows what those retards are going to add in upcoming games.
Otherwise, if you're a real jew, pick the 4GB. Seriously the price difference is low it's safer to go for the 8GB.
>>341803387
My GTX570 died a couple of months ago, and I want a new one. I was considering getting a RX 480. Would you recommend it?
>>341821270
We haven't seen proper benchmarks yet; Wait for them to make a decision.
>>341821214
>even an Nvidia
>it's meant to be grilled
>>341821093
Any recommended monitors?
>>341804267
Will RX470 be better than a gtx 950?
480 8gb version seems weird, if you're gonna run games that use more than 4gb you also need a better card anyway? How is that futureproof unless you plan to crossfire?
>>341821214
Where could I find these other models of the same card that have rad-as-fuck cooling fans, though? Do Sapphire, Gigabyte etc usually have plans to make custom cases for cards as new as this?
And thanks anon, I think I'll go with the 8GB version.
>>341821765
it's not. its only for crossfire.
>>341821765
>>341821963
If you're going to SLI/Crossfire, its more beneficial to just purchase a more powerful card for the same price.
SLI/Crossfire is buggy and not supported by MANY games. You will only encounter problems.
>>341822248
Yes i agree it's always better to get a single powerful card. This only gives an extra option to poor people down the road. Crossfire on AMD drivers is a nightmare nothing works on release for any games and some still don't work right months later.
Every time i update my drivers i see in the changelog. fixed crossfire issue with this, crossfire issue with etc still fucked.
>>341803387
Why Does Every Word Have A Fucking Capital Letter
>>341822248
Yes it is, but keep in mind that these are new cards, you're supposed to have a videocard by now, so crossfiring a new one with your old one is a good option to have.
>>341821846
>Do Sapphire, Gigabyte etc usually have plans to make custom cases for cards as new as this?
Yes, they do. Generally they already are available from launch.
Where to find these you ask? Well, in the same place you buy a GPU. Those aren't rare or anything, usually you have a picture of the GPU you are buying on the website and that is plenty enough to check which is reference / which isn't
>>341821846
It generally varies launch to launch when aftermarket cards are available. Not too long usually.
1070/1080 have some out now but they're sold out pretty much everywhere, 480 is supposedly launching with them same day(29th).
>>341821270
Don't spend too much on a video card, get a 8GB RX 480
AMD has never ever delivered in the end. Sorry.
>>341803387
I'm still waiting for the GTX1060
I want Fast Sync and I need at least 1 DL-DVI
>>341821765
The 8GB version seems appropriate considering a standard generation would put it at 390 performance, which makes use of the 8GBs of vram that it has.
>>341822710
>>341822793
Awesome, thanks guys. I actually feel like I know a little more of what I'm doing with this now.
I'll be on the lookout for more versions of the 480, hopefully they come out with one that's got a little more open space on the front to let the thing breathe.
>>341821507
NDA is not up yet, rumour say it's going to be about power of Fury
>>341804267
>The RX480 is supposed to be $199
well fuck i have a 780ti that's just now starting to chug on shit like mirrors edge catalyst. i could get two of these cards and run em in crossfire cheaper than i could buy a 1080.
>>341823084
Anything about power consumption?
>>341823183
> i could get two of these cards and run em in crossfire
no you can't.
>>341823278
any reason why not?
>>341823232
150w is max, it just can't draw more.
there were rumour that it can OC very well but I would wait for NDA lift for that rumour to be tested.
>>341823278
http://videocardz.com/61154/amd-radeon-rx-480-crossfire-3dmark-performance
says who
>>341823310
yes, there is.
You guys should wait it out a year for the 490/x unless you really need to upgrade now. I'm already saving up money for a 490.
>>341804754
>>341812175
You need to go back.
>>341822991
>390 performance, which makes use of the 8GBs of vram that it has.
Does it though?
>>341823959
It makes use of 6 it can't make use of 8 it's not powerful enough unless you crossfire.
>>341823959
Yes, and it's only going to become more frequent in a year or two. Plus games can use unfilled vram to cache things, blops3 does this and it caused some issues with the 970 because it would go over 3.5 by default.
>>341823437
I have always been really wary about crossfire/SLI. Loudness stacks, scaling isn't even 100%, twice as many parts that can fail, and higher PSU consumption. For CF 480s, I am not even sure it is worth the ~$200 you save against getting a 1080 in the long run.
>>341803387
I want to get one to compete my first desktop rig with crossfire but only gonna play at 1080p so I'm not sure.Laptop drives because that's what I just upgraded from.
>ips
>144hz
>1440p
>no panel issues
does such a monitor exist
>>341824460
>no ssd
>>341824460
>Windows 8
>>341824503
144hz 1440p
what gpu/cpu setup makes use of that? 1080 sli?
>>341824460
>crossfire for 1080p
complete waste. it's the current year, not 2006. just get the 480 by itself.
>>341824636
Hybrid is fine by me considering I only got into pc gaming late 2013. Graphics doesn't really matter but I just want to be able to play without worrying about upgrading.
>>341824665
What's the matter with win 8.1? Been on it and haven't had a single problem.
>>341824694
Yeah, but I just got the 290 (for $197 via Craigslist). I have a 3D tv but I may go with VR in the far future when it gets good.
>>341824673
ok throw freesync in there too
Guys
Will my 430W power supply be enough to support an RX 480? I hear it's only supposed to use 150W, but I'm sure the numbers on that can inflate a bit under stress.
>>341825134
>Yeah, but I just got the 290 (for $197 via Craigslist). I have a 3D tv but I may go with VR in the far future when it gets good.
You shouldn't buy a crossfire because in the future you're going to need it. You should buy it if you need it now, but if you don't need it yet it's better to wait as prices of cards overall are going to lower and better cards are coming out.
>>341810307
Do you have a link to this? I can't find it anywhere on their website.
I still got a GTX660.
With DX12 my FX8320 will finally be justified and this RX480 is around the corner, holy shit, im in heaven...
>>341825462
Okay, thanks anon-sama
>>341825403
Technically speaking, a mother board & PSU can provide together a maximum or 150w to a reference RX 480.
The PCIe port can provide itself a maximum of 75w, and the reference RX 480 has been shown to have only one 6 pin connector for alimentation through PSU, which can provide a maximum of 75w too. The maximum you can feed a reference RX 480 (custom versions might have additionnal connectors for more overclocking) is 150w, so it will never go over 150w.
>>341825403
Not if you have and AMD cpu
>>341821101
Partner companies are also selling the Founder's Edition, dipshit. Non-reference boards with better coolers do exist, they just haven't launched yet (or maybe they have but are sold out everywhere already and I just didn't notice)
Asus sells the FE for $700, and will be selling the Strix version for $600. Gigabyte will sell the FE for $700, and the Windforce for $600. Same with MSI, and Zotac, and EVGA, and Galax, and Gainward, and Colorful, etc.
