Why is there such a shortage of good ol' Vietnam games?
>>341762037
Cuz vietnam was too easy.
>>341762037
If the Americans were portrayed as the good guys sjws would get mad and if they weren't 'Muricans wouldn't play the game.
You can only kill terrorists or white males in modern shooters.
Because the whole game would be about walking through the jungle smoking weed, when you get shot in the head and killed by some gook hiding in the foliage.
>>341762037
cause the copyright costs for It Aint Me gets higher and higher every time they make a new one
>>341762037
....
>>341764236
kill yourself
>>341762037
Because murica lost.
>most vidya is made by americans
>americans don't like to make vidya about wars they lost
>vietnam vidya thread
>It ain't me starts playing
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Beda3kFNjo
>>341762037
Because amerifats don't want to remember how they got their asses kicked
>thread about vietnam
>barely any replies because americucks are STILL butthurt about losing
>>341765147
>>341765507
>>341766285
all me :)
Fighting a "losing" war could be interesting. You can still have victories and losses within that, not just a string of losing. And if the ultimate goal of the player is just to survive and get out at the end, you've still won anyway. It's just like how it can be interesting to play levels as the Germans in a WW2 game since it gives you a different perspective.
>>341766570
nobody wants to play as the drug abusing, civillian killing villains "America". any successful war fps needs to put the player in the shoes of the good guys - the Vietcong
>mission where you go in undercover to take out a unit of amerishits off their faces on LSD and liberate the innocent kindergarten aged vietnamese girls they were planning to rape
>>341766363
Liar
Battlefield Vietnam wasgood
>>341767119
I'd pay money to play a game where you try to drive the French out of Indochina. It's a conflict that doesn't get much attention.
