What do you all think?
Is the new IW going to ruin it?
Is it worth $80?
How much do you think is going to change?
CoD4 Original footage
https://youtu.be/xgc3e_knzlU
>someday /v/ will be nostalgic for mw
Never thought it'd happen so soon
>>341721792
>implying i'm not going to pirate the remaster and just shit on IW
>>341721882
>tfw eventually /v/ will be nostalgic for FO4
>>341721882
>I was 11 when CoD2 came out
man I miss that game. The 1887s were great, the nuke was badass. everything was just so overpowered that you didn't give a fuck.
>>341721882
My first CoD was WaW BUT once I enjoyed it so much I got CoD 4 and still play it. so it's been 7 years. A graphics bump with dedicated servers and a hackerless game is awesome.
>>341721995
Kek PC is like the wild west console that wont be possible.
>>341722161
woops I meant 12.
>>341721792
>not selling it separately
blunder. no way i'm buying an entire 60 dollar CoD just to get this. Shame, becuase i'd easily have bought a cod4 remaster stand alone.
>>341722161
>>341722241
Good joke.
Don't give a shit, i can still play MW right now and i don't need to play 80 buckaroonies to do it and i also get all the maps.
>>341721882
>cod 4 was released almost a decade ago
WOW ITS ALMOST AS IF TIME PASSES
>>341721792
If they keep the mechanics and netcode intact, I'll be playing this for sure.
Ever since MW2 the devs fucked with the netcode, putting built-in "lag reduction" which basically means, making connection times arbitrary, sometimes giving you up to 400ms or more advantage over others, sometimes vice-versa, and it keeps getting worse with each release.
If that shit is in the remaster, I won't play it.
>>341722305
They're going to release it separately once the IW sales start to die down, Activision aren't stupid.
It's definitely going to be worth 80$ if they don't ruin it and stick to the original, although I wouldn't mind if they removed the marty/last stand/jugger perks. It's also gonna have dedicated servers which allows for more awesome options (such as restricting those perks). Also if promod becomes a thing again that would be great.
One of the few multi player games I'm looking forward to, hoping the they don't screw it up.
I hope they don't make the graphics to clustered and keep it clean, kinda like this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ll2sV9s_y0A&index=18
>>341721792
Pointless.
Not worth it.
just play CoD4 on PC
>>341722828
If I could save time in a bottle, the first thing that I'd like to do is to save every game till eternity passes awayjust to play them with you.
i can play it right now in HD, so im not going to rebuy it
![old-age-retirement-pensioners-retirement-old-remember-forget-grin98_low[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/ZOWrgBF.jpg "old-age-retirement-pensioners-retirement-old-remember-forget-grin98_low[1].jpg")
>>341721792
>max quality: 240p
i swear i can smell the scent of xfire, nero, msn messenger and winamp
all in that fucking video
>>341721792
Why don't people just reinstall the old game for cheap?
>>341725262
Console babbies
It's going to look better.
The best CoD will have populated servers once again, and no hacking.
It won't have all the maps.
You can't buy it at a separate, reasonable price.
I don't know if it's worth it honestly.
anyone buying this shit is the cancer killing video games
>>341725446
>I don't know if it's worth it honestly.
It isn't, you can get the original for like 5 bux these days and the hacking is no where near as rampant as idiots make it out to be. Hacking's only rampant on consoles.
>>341725163
2007 was the last good year, afterwards it all went to shit and modern whorefare was one of the reasons behind it
>>341722839
I never understood the juggernaut hate at least not in CoD4. In WaW seeing the jugger plus when you're using an unscoped bolt-action was annoying sure but in CoD4? nah.
The vast majority of the time all juggernaut did was deny those who relied on stopping power.
>b-but its bullshit because my UAV jammer/dead silence sniper doesn't one shot kill.
Maybe try helping your team with an AR/SMG instead of shitting it up in a corner with a sniper.
>But muh hardcore mode.
Game isn't balanced for hardcore.
>>341721882
get fucked, 30 year old faggot.
>>341721792
This game is garbage, SP or MP. UT99, Quake 3 and CS 1.6 are infinitely better than this.
>>341721882
1) COD4 was revolutionary at the time, there is a reason so many games in the decade following tried to copy it
2) it was the most polished of the nu-COD games
3) the MP is the most balanced and doesn't include as many gimmicks
4) it's almost 10 years old; even if you are 30 now, that would mean it came out 1/3 of your life ago
>>341725625
All it was was a direct counter to Stopping Power and the fact that 90% of the playerbase used SP as a crutch was why it was hated.
>Game isn't balanced for hardcore.
I disagree, the game becomes more balanced in hardcore, when everything is overpowered, nothing is overpowered.
>>341721792
I'm going to buy the shit out of it if it releases as a standalone for a reasonable price. For 80 dollars bundled with the new shit? Hell no.
>>341727052
I think it will, probably some time after Christmas when they've got all those Christmas monies.
>>341721792
I'd buy it day one if it was standalone but fuck the new epic space shooter garbage, no way I'm buying that under any circumstances.
>The only good CoD games were CoD1 and CoD4
This remake won't bring back the best mid 2000s blend of LAN parties and online multiplayer before kids picked up only for the brand.
Why the fuck aren't all the maps in it? They're going to release them as DLC later, aren't they?
>>341727389
Yes.
I ain't even mad tho.
>>341725594
Game is dead online.
>>341727052
$63 if you have Amazon Prime
>>341721882
It's 10 years old, I think that qualifies for nostalgia material.
>>341727495
I never have a problem finding matches. There is a bug where the servers all show up almost empty, but it's fixed by deleting your cache files and relaunching.
>>341726761
>COD4 was revolutionary at the time, there is a reason so many games in the decade following tried to copy it
L O FUCKING L
Just like people started claiming that halo was innovative, now people are claiming cod was
>>341721882
It's nine years old. What is it with /v/ and this arbitrary belief that something has to be x amount of years old before you can feel nostalgic for it? Literally anything that happened in the past qualifies for nostalgia. You could be nostalgic for a piece of fucking bread you ate last week.
>>341727637
It's not the same, on the rerelease everyone will be flooding it and it'll a frantic mess but it'll be nostalgic fun.
>>341727581
The whole "nostalgia only applies after a certain period" thing is a load of bollocks, you can literally be nostalgiac for something that happened a month ago. Nostalgia is nothing but missing something from the past, there is no time limit.
>>341727361
Call of Duty 1 (+UO), 2 and 5 were the good ones.
>>341727714
Because this game was widely hated and constantly criticized here
Now people here are nostalgic for it and glad to have a remake of the game that killed the cod series.
Just wait a few years and we'll have people claiming skyrim was great too
>>341721882
really makes you think huh
>>341727842
they are already claiming me2 was good and i even saw a da2 thread a week or so go
>>341727842
>all of /v/ is one person
>/v/ has been used by the exact same people consistently since 2007 with no new people wandering in and old ones leaving
>>341721792
>$80
You're kidding
>>341727842
>skyrim
>implying people aren't saying it already
>>341728108
I'd say that's 99% shitposting 1% shitty taste.
>>341728051
would you expect anything less from the series that brought us season passes, yearly rehashes and dlc out the ass?
>>341728234
/tesg/ wouldn't exist then.
>>341728321
>/vg/
>not saturated with plebs with awful tatse
>>341728046
>I can't understand simple sentences
lel how underaged?
>>341727682
It's hilarious when people think being popular or selling a lot means revolutionary.
It just means the jews found a new way to make money.
It was not revolutionary: just shitty enough that all the devs and jews at the top saw they could make games with little to no effort.
Same reason with the Last of Us and other games like that, next you'll say that mobile game Castle whatever was revolutionary because a shit ton of games copy them.
Is OW revolutionary because it has more LoL players and people tried copying it?
No it's just TF2 slightly tweakedz
Stop being mentally ill.
>>341727842
>Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare
>killed the cod series
no you faggot
>>341728492
Indeed you can't.
>>341728582
>da joos done did it!
Are you people for real?
>>341728619
>all of /v/ is one person XDDD
>in response to a post that said "widely hated"
how underaged?
>>341728590
It started the downward spiral and completely fucked the FPS genre in it's entirety because everything needed to imitate it.
>>341727842
You are straight up lying or confusing MW with MW2 you dumb piece of shit. Fuck off you probably started browsing /v/ last year.
>>341728590
Yes it did, as a lot of long time CoD fans at the time believed
>>341728709
Are you for fucking real in thinking mw was innovative?
>>341728748
>because everything needed to imitate it
Thats not the games nor IWs fault though. The game is the best CoD game there is.
>>341728748
MW1 only dug the hole, the rest of the industry were the ones who willing threw themselves into it by believing everything needed to be a modern military shooter.
>>341728848
It doesn't need to be at fault to be the cause.
>>341728771
>I'll call others new thats a good trick
>>341728713
>widely hated and constantly criticised here
>here
>here
At least read what you fucking wrote before spewing shite all over the keyboard
>>341728709
Jew equals money grubbing fuck wad
Hebrew equals actual human beings
Its rare to meet Hebrews who arnt Jews.
Its like the difference between nigger and black.
>>341728902
>believing everything needed to be a modern military shooter.
far from the only problem with MW1
>>341729080
>widely hated
>this means everyone!!!!!
Could you maybe read you dumb fucking britfag
>>341721792
>80 bucks
>for a remaster
what the fuck
I'd rather have a Halo PC CE remaster.
>>341728848
No matter what it it fucked anyone who played fps's before COD.
I remember how innovative some were and they were more of them, I used to mainly enjoy singleplayer fps games.
Now the only shooters you get are multiplayer only or have like 4 hours of singleplayer that is tacked on. Or just mp for full price.
The saddest part is COD actually have a longer story than any other FPS now a days because all the other ones are still copying the old ones. BATTLEFIELD 3 for example.
>>341729386
I kind of understand why BF3 had a campaign though, it was expected of them after the Bad Company series and they didn't want to put too much effort into it because the real meat and bones was the multiplayer, although they fucked that up anyway.
I wanna play on pc but CoD dies so fast on pc :(
>>341727682
Almost every fps game now has elements that cod started, you can be in denial all you want but it doesn't change the fact that it had a big role in the fps genre
>>341730036
>it was revolutionary!!!
>hmmm I cant name anything new it introduced
>well it made things popular!!!
>so your wrong!
L O L
>>341721882
and? people here who are 20 now were 11 when that game came out and might feel nostalgia
who fucking cares
>>341728791
Perk system and loadouts became mainstream with MW so yeah, it was innovative in its way.
>>341721792
CoD4 vanilla always sucked, the only good thing about the game was promod and that is not gonna come back.
>>341730449
>mainstream = revolutionary
>>341730618
It's a dramatic change to the norm, so yes it is.
>>341730562
I never understood promod. If you're going to remove everything from CoD that makes it CoD... why not just go back to Counter-Strike?
![Jealous+of+what+he+is+a+faggot+with+a+_2984eb9410cfe0f7ee1b1ba2878b0a85[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/2ROvhtj.jpg "Jealous+of+what+he+is+a+faggot+with+a+_2984eb9410cfe0f7ee1b1ba2878b0a85[1].jpg")
>>341730618
>innovative = revolutionary
>>341731053
>I don't know what the original discussion was about but let me reply anyway
>>341730724
It popularized those features, but it did not create them.
>>341726761
>1) COD4 was revolutionary at the time,
No it wasn't, the only reason so many games tried to copy it is because it was popular.
>>341731281
Just because you don't like it doesn't mean it wasn't revolutionary, a revolution means a dramatic change, nothing else, it doesn't have to be good. The fact that so many games did copy it means it was a revolution.
>>341729080
stupid bong
>>341731502
Fuck off Activision
>>341721792
they arleady remake it every year
>>341731502
> a revolution means a dramatic change
In a political sense yes. The word "revolution" makes no sense in the video game industry other than it being a marketing buzzword. Cod 4 sold a lot yes, a lot of games tried to copy it because of it's succes but there is nothing "revolutionary" about that.
>>341731663
>it doesn't have to be good
Nice try faggot.
>>341731502
>a revolution means a dramatic change, nothing els
And what the fuck did cod revolutionize?
What new, dramatic changes did it bring to the fps genre that had never been tried before?
>>341731885
perks and shit
epic quickscopes
>>341731757
The term is not exclusive to politics anon. Ever hear of the industrial revolution? That had nothing to do with politics, it was just a change to machinery over manual labour.
>>341731885
Perks.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BARPQNW09Jc
legendary... dat nostalgia
>>341732075
>Industrial revolution had nothing to do with politics
>>341732267
It is not a manditory law to use machinery in manufacturing, it's just easier.
cod4 by itself was pretty shit, promod was what made the game good.
>>341732584
Yeah you can totally open a factory and use machines freely in 1820 England without the involvement of the government. The government totally had no involvement in building working class homes that housed people who moved from the countryside to the city.
>CoD 4 came out 10 years ago
>>341733240
If it's your land? Yeah, you can.
>>341733240
The industrial revolution was the reason building permits became manditory, factories were popping up everywhere because any prick with enough money and land could open one. Permission wasn't required until 1844.
>>341728709
Kike detected.
>>341721882
>all the nu /v/ trash getting mad at this post
reminder that you're all faggots raised on literal shit
>>341728582
The game changed the market and demographics for years to come, that's textbook revolutionary. Just because you're uneducated and think revolutionary has to have a positive connotation to it, doesn't mean other people are wrong.
Get fucked, American
>>341735368
cod4 is an american game.
>>341731663
This is SJW-tier ignoring of facts
>>341735417
I'm not sure what you're trying to say
>>341721882
You do realize on release everyone here was playing it, right? We had Grenade of Grenade Warfare thread, bitching about Veteran for months while people posted their perk loadouts, and bitching about killstreaks. There were also the CoD1/2 purists who kept shitposting that it was the worst game in existence and it derailed threads completely. It wasn't until MW2 where people started petering out on the discussion since every thread just got shitposted on with
>Call of Duty
Hell, up until Black Ops 2 there were still threads on release for the games, and Advanced Warfare is the only one I know where there was a decent amount of discussion for a month here.
>>341735591
i'm just saying if you think americans are uneducated and dumb but you think cod4 is so great, it was created by americans. just letting you know.
>>341735916
Your reading comprehension needs work. He never said it was great, he said a revolution doesn't always have to be positive.
>>341736207
i think he was just acknowledging the other guys opinion though, his OP doesn't suggest that he thinks it's a bad game.
>>341735916
Oh, I see.
So you're confirming the prejudices as well. You're ignorant and interpret what I'm REALLY saying.
1. i never said CoD4 is great, eventhough I do like it
2. you have to get rid of the notion that just because i defend a statement, doesnt mean im in favour of it
3. i never said i hate or dislike america as a whole or all americans. I just think that culture breeds more ignorant, self righteous and uneducated people than others, which is clearly evident by just looking at this thread
4. if I did theoretically hate america, that does not mean i would automatically hate everything by america. This reflects how you think and its really childish
>>341729663
BF3 was reallyfunthough.
>>341736367
you are the ignorant one though if you judge an entire country's culture by a few people you see in a 4chan thread.
>>341736505
Nah man. Bullshit like supression and a broken netcode really ruined it for me. BfBC2 was the last really good Battlefield title imo. It was just pure gameplay fun, no bs mechanics or stupid gimmicks. Just teamwork and shootin niggas
>>341736887
I lived in the USA for 2 years and I'm a teacher. I've seen many people and know your society and educational system. It's sub par and founded on skewed principles.
>>341736505Funmeans nothing on it's own, Aliens Colonial Marines is arguablyfunif you're farting about with a friend but that doesn't stop it being a shitty game.
>>341737090
yeah yeah there's always that convenient anecdote whenever you talk to a european about america. never saw a european teacher here in my life but online you're all teachers with experience in America.
>>341737230
>well I have never seen one, it can't be true
Spoken like a stereotypical ignorant American. People travel, it's not out of the ordinary.
>>341737230
Your personal bubble is not indicative of the entirety of the United States.
>I've never seen a black man in person, so black men don't exist!
>>341721792
There really is no point honestly. A couple things.
1. Should have been the only CoD release this year if they were serious about it
2. Would need new things to make it fresh since the later CoD's pretty much blow it out the water content wise
People aren't really playing CoD4 anymore. I fail to see how a remaster that brings nothing new besides graphics is going to change anything. People can tell that it doesn't seem like they are truly putting effort into this remake because it's behind the paywall of another CoD. Had it been it's own thing with them making additions people would have been more interested. As is it looks like an insulting cash grab. An unnecessary one too since it's not like the new CoD (was it infinite warfare?) is going to sell poorly.
>>341737494
>>341737552
alright then, what school did you teach at, what was the subject, and what was the name of the president of your college?
What's going on with all those remasters?
Did dev gotten so lazy that they don't want to make games anymore.
Like what the fuck there was like 6 remaster released in 2 weeks.
>>341737764
I assume it's just console peasants who can't play the game anymore because of scripters. I find it hard to believe that any PC player worth their salt would care about a remaster of a game they can play anyway with more content at a fraction of the price.
>>341737784
Just the first is mine.
I taught in Philadelphia, Orange County and Chicago to get some diversified experience and see something new. I teach elementary school, uni teachers are called professors.
And you could easily accuse me of looking up a school and names so why should I give into your demands if all your previous posts indicate that you will not listen anyways and discard my information as lies?
>>341738143
cod4 still has a solid community on 360, script kiddies usually stick to search and destroy, and even then they're not that annoying because they are all terrible and they can't even get kills when they're hovering over the map.
>>341737949
Severe lack of console backwards compatibility is probably the biggest factor. And yeah, lazy devs.
They're going to keep making remakes as long as idiots keep asking for them.
>>341721792
>What do you all think?
it's obviously part of the marketing mix for the new space cod, used to highlight the slight increase in map size compared to the original game and the unrealistic zipline and spacemarine mechanics compared to current competitor: BF1.
>Is the new IW going to ruin it?
the original was a simple kill grinder FPS that actually worked, the people that designed and made it work make titanfall now. how can people simply copying something not make it worse?
>Is it worth $80?
no, but someone will buy it, so why not sell it?
>How much do you think is going to change?
they will import maps into the new engine and replace the art assets. the devs will want to keep the same netcode but the execs will tells them they can save 0.05$ per user if they use the current shit code, and these people have bonuses to think about!
not if you played it on PC
>>341737949
This console generation is the generation of remasters. Expect the next generation to be worse
>Hey guys, we remastered all these games from last gen for you in sorta 4k, only 59.99 enjoy
>>341738263
because if you had responded in a couple of minutes with all three pieces of information i would have believed you, but now there is no way you're going to convince me.
>>341738279
I played it on 360 about 2 years ago and the hacking was rampant, that was HC TDM though.
>>341738432
Oh no, whatever will I do, if a guy on an anonymous tibetan cloth trading board doesn't believe me?
>>341738143
Even then the other CoD's as I pointed out blow it out the water content wise.
To put it literally and I do mean literally, CoD4 has nothing to offer in 2016. This isn't like a remaster of other games people might care about. People have been conditioned to expect yearly CoD releases now going back to 2007. They are essentially the sports titles of the shooter genre. I fail to see how even the biggest nostalgia fags would care that much to go back to CoD4 after all the other CoD's (including it's sequel) vastly improved on the formula CoD4 itself introduced.
Even if joe blow still somehow perfers CoD4 over the others (let's be real here most casuals wouldn't really care or even might prefer MW 2 or 3 instead which sales prove this without a doubt) this remaster still feels like a rip off. They aren't even remastering all the maps. Which I assume is at least 50% the reason people might even go back.
What they should have did is either truly remaster and improve upon MW1 with more content or simply make MW4 which would actually be the much smarter thing to do because casuals are craving modern warfare again. New MW games though not a remaster.
>>341738298
>>341738341
>Consoles
Buy the 60$ remaster where they """upscaled"" the resolution
>PC
Just pick whatever resolution you want from the option menu and slap in an HD texture mode if you want more.
what da fug
>>341738279
This isn't true. Last played it years ago but even then it was a complete mess with barely anyone playing anymore. Most gametypes were pretty much empty.
>>341738476
>>341738874
it's different now though. a lot of them have been banned, you basically never see them in TDM or Domination anymore. they like SnD for some reason.
>>341739026
What's the average number playing on say afternoon-8pm hours?
>>341736887
>>341737230
>tells guy he is ignorant for judging a country by anecdotal evidence, based on a small portion of people
>does the same
Kek
tfw wasted over 30 actual days of my life on CoD4 multiplayer
Man to this day I never played a single other online multiplayer game more then that. Makes me feel like alosertbqh ;_;
>>341738771
What they should have done is remastered all 3 MW games and put it in a collection, a la Halo MCC. But i think they knew no one wanted Infinite Warfare so they slapped the MW remaster on it to boost sales.
It's going to be interesting to see how many people buy the normal copy of IW and how many buy the special editions.
>>341739132
the player counter has been broken for years. there can't be that many, i see the same GTs every now and then but for TDM it's definitely well over 100.
>>341739495
I see your point but I seriously fail to see much of a point in simply remastering the games honestly. The games run at 60fps don't they? The graphics also look fine for what they are for the most part. With Halo MCC a remaster was definitely noticeable boost in appearance. CoD4 then and now? It's largely going to look the same. It's a realistic military themed shooter in appearance.
My bad for the long posts but I agree with what you said. This move really screams of desperation on their part. They are out of ideas. The best new innovative thing I seen out of the series was Blops 2's pick ten really. I still hated the game but I definitely liked that pick ten class system they did.
>>341739138
except i wasn't judging his country's culture. literally every time i get into a discussion about america with a european, they claim that they've lived here for years. every single time, without fail.
