RX470 5% slower than 970
- Home
- Board: /v/ - Video Games
- Reading: RX470 5% slower than 970
http://www.guru3d.com/news-story/radeon-rx-470-benchmarks.html
Why is nobody talking about this?
>CROSSFIRE WILL SAVE US
>BUT BUT ASHES OF SINGULARITY
>$150 card is slightly weaker than $300 card
wow, AMD is doomed
>>341691535
$150 card trading blows with a $300 card. seems pretty cool to me
it's better investment to buy a 1070 instead of 470
>>341691659
the 970 just got a hefty price cut and
>falling for amd hype when they have literally not delivered a single time since the bulldozer both cpu and gpu wise
>>341691873
unless you are strictly playing at 1080p or below..
>>341691939
okay, a $150 card trading blows with a $250 card
>>341691939
Also,
>synthetic benchmarks
If you looked at those you'd think the faildozer and shitshera were outstanding CPUs, except in real performance they are absolute garbage. They mean shit. Wait for the thing to actually come out and judge it in real case scenarios.
>inb4 mad amdpoorfag saying his cpu is j-j-just f-f-f-fine!!!11!!!!!!11!!
>>341692096
this post is atrocious
>>341691939
>$25 price cut
THE SAVINGS
>>341691939
Price cuts now just tells me that Nvidia is worried and can't compete at that range. Pascal has shit supply and I bet GP106 is too far away.
