Why you didn't tell me this game was good /v/?
Nobody bought it
Because we're not 7 years old.
>>341652595
It's a Nintendo select, I guess it sold ok
>>341652649
>mature games for mature players.jpg
>>341652467
I did
Nobody believed me or they said "ew a Lego game"
I've tried many times.
>legos
>>341652467
Lego games are always moderately enjoyable.
The marvel one is pretty good
>That last level
>>341652467
You never asked.
It's pretty fun.
finished and then realised how much more shitty side objectves there were to do.
>>341652467
People did tell you it is a good game barring the really shitty loading
It's the best Lego game, so mild fun. Drastically hampered by the loading times.
>>341652467
Not something I would play myself, but my 11 year-old brother loved the game and I sat through him playing it multiple times.
The voice acting and writing were surprisingly not-awful, it's basically GTA-lite, for kids, with Legos.
>>341656174
Lego games are always pretty funny 2bh
>>341656292
This one had a lot more dialogue than something like Star Wars though so I was pleasantly surprised with how not-horrible it was. I expected the typical nonsense you see in those fucking god-awful Lego cartoon shows.
i never played a lego game before. then i tried this. it was amazing. it's like gta with legos, but way more light hearted. the slap stick humor and humor in general is surprisingly great.
this game is in the top 10 best wii u games list easily.
i just hope it sold well enough. the 3ds version, which is a prequel, sold pretty well too, i believe. so all in all it was probably a success.
hopefully we'll see a lego city undercover 2 on NX. because the only thing that wasn't that great about LCU were the super long loading times and the poor image quality. otherwise the game was top notch.
