Any Shadowverse hype? Soft release date is tomorrow.
https://www.shadowverse.com
I definitely enjoyed smashing the shit out of people with Havencraft dragons during the open beta.
why would i play this over other card games?
>>341599732
Anime art.
That's it.
This is all set up way too much like a shill thread.
I'm usually not one to call this shit but this is kind of obvious bud.
>>341599732
It's pretty snappy on mobile devices, some of the deck types are unique, and I like the limited-use haste+buff transformation mechanic.
>>341599732
it's like hearthstone without having to deal with the fact blizzard can't balance for shit and everyone plays the same 3 deck over and over
>>341599829
Sorry if it seems like it, but it's not. The game was free during beta.
I only just realized it's coming out tomorrow and wanted to see if anyone else had noticed.
IS THERE A MTG RIPOFF THAT DOESN'T REQUIRES CRYSIS-TIER RIG?
Hex is so fun, but my laptop almost shitting itself every phase. It just card games, why render all this 3d-backgrounds and shader 3.0 effects?
>>341600317
I don't know of any other similar games, but I play MTG on Xmage. Its anything but CPU-intensive.
And is also sometimes broken...
how quickly can you get packs and how common are legendaries?
>>341600859
the game is not even out, so how the fuck would we know?
>>341600959
beta
>>341601109
>beta
the beta was super generous but that was because it was a fucking beta and all your progress got deleted obviously
>>341599241
Eh I prefer to stick to Mabinogi Duel but thanks for the suggestion.
>>341600859
>>341601210
The beta gave you tons of dosh. Once you had a decent deck and could grind a little, you could liquidate extras from packs to get the cards you were missing. I had every card in the game.
It was the beta though, no idea what sort of pricing/rarity they'll be going for. Not much info on the site beyond the new cards.
Don't care if it's shilling or not, I like card games.
Is it F2P? How good are control decks?
Mobile? there's a desktop version?
Someone sell me on this. You're up, shills.
>>341599241
Page is down nigga.
>>341601739
>is it F2P?
yes
>how good are control decks?
as i was saying the game is basicaly like hearthstone except instead of 9 classes there are 7
- the elf is all about summoning shitty 1/1 pixie, and almost half of her cards give you free 1/1 summon, to help with this, some of her card only trigger if you played 2 or more cards during your turn so in that way i guess it's sort of like the rogue
- the witch is all about spells, several of her cards are just spell that summon creature, this is because her gimmick is that her cards get stronger or get more bonus the more spell she plays (for example she has a card that give her a free extra turns that cost like 13 mana but for every spell you play the mana cost goes down by 1) so i guess she's like mage
- the necromancer is all about letting your creature dies and deathrattle effect, unlike hearthstone, shadowverse keeps track of how many cards end in your graveyard and the necromancer card get powered up by how many of them bites the dust (her strongest card turns into a 10/10 with charge if you have like half of your deck into the graveyard) so i guess she doesn't have an hearthstone equivalent
- the vampire is all about health manipulation, if you are at 15 health or lower all his card get stronger and meaner so a lot of his cards involve him punching himself in the face or stealing health from the enemy in order to counterbalance punching yourself in the face, i guess the closest to hearthstone would be the warlock
- the dragoon is all about big huge ass spell, half of his effect let him discard low cost cards in the hope of drawing high cost cards, some increase his mana, and a good chunk of them gain extra effect upon reaching 5 mana, i guess the hearthstone closest equivalent would be the druid without the whole "pick a choice" gimmick
- the knight is another swarming character like the elf but where the elf is more like the rogue, the knight plays more like the paladin, (cont)
>>341601739
>>341602194
No official info on pricing that I could find, I'd assume you just pay for packs.
Here's some gameplay: https://youtu.be/i6QxMlJJFnk
Havencraft was kinda controly... and there's universal basic cards for removal, burn, etc. so you can stack your deck with hate.
>>341601856
Only mobile friend.
>>341602504
Doesn't need the www: https://shadowverse.com
>>341602728
I like how it looks but I can't help that is a little oversaturated in the screen effects.
>OP's a shill
Might as well pseudoshill my indieshit. I'm making a single player drafting CCG where you draft a deck then have to go through a series of opponents from whom you can steal cards to improve your deck. Roguelite elements. Would you potentially give me your shekels?
>>341602616
the knight gimmick is that some card are officer and some are captain and the captain and officer interact with each other so for example there is a captain that give ward to all the officer, or an officer that let you search for captain and so on
- the last class is the priestess,and her gimmick is that all her creature come delayed, that's it, you play the creature now, it comes out 2-3 turns later, since waiting for your creature to actualy reach the battlefield is her whole strategy, she's the most control oriented character with card that let you buy time or speed up how long it takes for them to reach the battlefield
the other difference with hearthstone is that you have evolve point, the first player start with 2 and the second player start with 3 (in the same way hearthstone try to balance with the coin) after 3 in game turns have passed, each player can evolve his cards, this usualy involve a card getting a free +2/+2 and the ability to attack other creature cards as if it had charge so it usualy helps a lot with swinging with the tempo
some cards change abilities upon evolving like there is a card that heal you when unevolved but that deal damage to the enemy when evolved, or some cards get to repeat their effect when evolving and so on... i think it's an interessing mechanic
other than what i said there is nothing else to shill, it's hearthstone with animu character instead of blizzard awful humor
>>341602728
>you can stack your deck with hate
That's what I wanted to hear.
Also thanks to the anon explaining the game's classes.
>>341603138
As long as the card game part is fine, probably. Which rogelite elements were you planning on?
>>341603138
Sounds fun, the only issue I ever have with drafting is the fact that the deck is usually not something I'd play with afterwards. How do you hope to combat that?
Can you save cards for other decks? Any multiplayer? Art style?
Since this is the CCG thread I want to ask.
is there any game that kinda plays like Doomtown Reloaded or Warhammer 40K Conquest? I'm looking for something where units can move around in the table and conflicts/battles are done in a kinda indirect way.
>>341603398
>Which rogelite elements were you planning on?
The game is played in campaigns. Each campaign you draft a deck and try to beat a certain number of increasingly difficult opponents, choosing who to face next based on which cards you'd like to steal. You can "run away" from opponents other than the final boss a limited number of times. If you lose a match the save is deleted but you unlock cards for your inter-campaign collection. When you start a campaign you may choose to bring some cards from your collection before drafting the rest. Actually beating the game unlocks a huge amount.
Someone here that plays hex can help in this?
why is so difficult to earn cards in this game? also it worths the gold/plat to out Evol.Gauntlet?
>>341601617
the art is cute so i'll try it i guess
>>341604005
>Sounds fun, the only issue I ever have with drafting is the fact that the deck is usually not something I'd play with afterwards. How do you hope to combat that?
That's actually incredibly difficult to get right IMO. You have to design the whole set from the ground up such that if the players are presented with random cards from it according to the draft format they statistically have a good chance to draft a deck with a coherent curve and card type balance. My answer is a bit primitive but I made it so that the entire set follows a relatively smooth gaussian curve and the ratio of cards of different types in the set is the same as the ratio most decks would like to run. Overly situation cards are counted differently.
>Can you save cards for other decks?
See
>>341604043
>Any multiplayer?
None. Dedicated servers are expensive and I'm doubtful whether implementing a peer-to-peer mode is worthwhile since you cannot really prevent cheating without a third party server handshaking in the middle.
>Art style?
Wireframe. Your game's far prettier but wireframe's cheaper :)
heartstone with anime girls, nuff to get me hyped
>>341604703
That's what got me into it :D
That and annoying the piss out of people with the character voice lines. Just like Hearthstone!
What with games that try to copy Hearthstone or ripoff MTG?
>>341605197
You mean the two most successful DTCGs on the market? I wonder why...
>>341599241
Is the devourer the slut or the dragon?
>>341605523
Yes.
>>341604898
I wish you the best of luck, it sounds promising.
I can understand not wanting to have abusable multiplayer, but I think people might get sick of grinding their faces against AI forever.
Bu-bu-bu-buuuump
>>341604898
Be sure to shill it a bit here when it's done so we know.
Giving out a bunch of Steam keys is also good publicity.
>>341604898
>>341606943
Got a name yet?
I'll play it for a bit, but Mabinogi Duels is the superior mobile card game.
>>341607530
Hot damn, it's even got counterspells. Might have to look into this.
Fucking Barongs
>>341600107
>>341600592
>>341601617
>>341604005
>>341604702
>>341605035
>>341607498
>>341609220
>>341608487
>Hearthstone with a weebshit art style.
Looks like complete shit, why would anyone want this? Go shill somewhere else.
>>341609542
OK bye! Thanks for stopping by!
>>341611337
HAHAHAHA
>>341612339
I though /v/ would be the kind of place to try to disccuss some card games that aren't fucking YGO or MTG.
>>341599241
>tmorrow
Great, will try
>>341602728
Wow.... Anime hearthstone sounded great until I saw the video. How much are you getting paid to shill this crap?
>>341612713
Better luck over in /tg/ maybe. I just figured this game was more /v/-relevant.
>>341612853
Nope. /tg/ is MTG central. games that aren't MTG get deleted in a couple of hours due lack of interest
>>341612973
I'd believe it, there usually isn't much to discuss if there isn't competitive play/expansions/metagaming. Local card shop maybe?
>>341604220
>hex
Beg people for the essential cards, Im not kiddi g thats the only way to get the cards you need
>>341612786
What about it is off-putting? Just curious, since I've come to like the design.
>>341612713
last time I saw a Force of Will general in /tg/
also /vp/ has a TCG general too.
>>341614532
Tcg general? Only for Pokemon or other card games a are allowed?
>>341613620
>What about it is off-putting?
The awful fucking design, for one.
It's hearthstone with Sugoi! xD generic moeshit anime for pedos. Nothing about it is appealing unless you're a degenerate faggot.
>>341615782
Discussing non-Pokémon card games on the Pokémon board probably isn't going to happen.
>>341616537
>Shitty, generic aethetics can't be shit because they're like my japanese animes xD!
Fuck off, dumb weeb.
>>341610314
>Female Pugna.
>Mfw no art of a Leatherman-style King of Pain
>>341617467
Thanks for the (You), gonna continue enjoying my sparkles and shiny things. Have fun playing CoD.
>>341599241
It's getting steam release at some point.
>>341618172
Oh neat, good to know. No wonder they introduced that new deckbuilding portal, would be a pain to work cross-platform.
>>341618080
>Have fun playing CoD.
I don't play CoD, but the fact you think that's some srt of harsh insult speaks leagues about you. You sound like you were bullied in school last week and weebshit is your only console.
>>341618172
Why? It looks like utter shit? It's like Hearthstone with a worse artstyle.
Plus this guy shilling it proves the developers have little faith in the project.
>>341618450
>It's like Hearthstone with a worse artstyle.
You kidding? Hearthstone is western SJW garbage while Shadowverse has beautiful anime girls including LOLIS (unlike Hearthstone whose only women are all old hags).
>>341618626
Oh right, you're a retarded pedofile.
This game is right up your alley then. Judging by this thread, only tremendous faggots are into it.
>>341618450
I wasn't trying to insult you, just get you to go back to whatever shithole you decided to crawl out of so you could fall into mine.
>>341618859
Bye SJW.
>>341617805
Wait, how does this not exist. Something to bring up around drawfags I guess. QoP incubus...
>>341619048
Theres nothing SJW about saying you're a fucking faggot with shit taste, my dim witted friend.
>>341619795
>using the pedo boogeyman
Totally not a SJW ok. Just like all the twitter feminists manga readers who said Kodomo no Jikan kickstarter should be banned are TOTALLY NOT SJWS either.
:)
>>341620142
>Kodomo no Jikan
I don't give a fuck about your ching chong shit.
You're just fucking gay for like thing weebshit card game, sorry.
>>341620339
>I'm not gay, but the fact you think that's some srt of harsh insult speaks leagues about you. You sound like you were bullied in school last week and shitspewing is your only console.
>>341620974
Come again?
>>341621108
Why are you here if this gayass weebshit card game doesn't get your rocks off? I'm playing regardless of your differing opinion, and hell, I might even enjoy it every now and again.
>>341621595
People come here to discuss games, I'm throwing in my 2 cents because I know about cards games. It's not as deep as MtG, it's not as fun as HS, It has a disgustingly generic weebshit aesthetic.
Because the gameplay has been done better everywhere else, the only people left to be interested are sad pedos.
If you wanted a safe place where the mean men can't tell you your games are shit a bloo bloo bloo, fuck off back to red dit.
>>341615782
only for pokemon
>>341622105
>not as deep as MtG, not as fun as HS
Funny, I didn't think you played this game. Maybe you're just judging it based on the few images I've dumped and the single gameplay video I provided?
I've never seen a TCG that had every creature be dual-sided and have triggerable haste/charge. You know, almost like a completely new resource to learn how to manage?
>>341623118
>I've never seen a TCG that had every creature be dual-sided and have triggerable haste/charge. You know, almost like a completely new resource to learn how to manage?
yeah, and they handled it like complete shit. You can stop shilling any time now. I'm sure your manager doesn't appreciate you posting pedofile weeb webms while at work.
>>341623409
God do I love you people <3
>>341623118
wtf happened to anime?
Compare the shit you posted to this.
>>341623767
Ignore him, he's a shill thats been shitposting this whole thread.
That doesn't look like generic weebshit, what is it? Looks similar to JinRoh.
>>341623767
A lot of things have happened friend. Nowadays it's boatgirls, planegirls and bikegirls.
Just slap a big pair on any old machine to get the weebs' nostalgia mixed up with their lust.
>>341600106
so it has a large amount of different deck types? More than hearthstone? I don't believe you
>>341600107
>>341599241
Looks too much like rage of bahamut.
FUCK that game and its P2W models killing any real advancement in mobile gaming.
>>341624030
Patlabor
>>341624475
I everything associated with that good? I'm the kind of weirdo who has to watch everything in order.
>>341624404
>looks too much like rage of bahamut
maybe it's because it's reusing the same art because it's made by the same company you worthless buffoon?
>>341624289
7 classes, each with a decent number of class-specific cards, and some run-of-mill universal cards.
Not as many cards as hearthstone, but it's also just being released tomorrow.
>>341624712
Nah, it's got some cute girls, you probably wouldn't like.
>>341625764
Just watch the movie the clip is from. I didn't post it but I remember that movie being fucking solid.
>>341625571
>it's got some cute girls, you probably wouldn't like.
Why did you bring this up out nowhere?
>>341599241
No, because "this app is not available in your region" when I can just aswell download the jap APK/
And mabinogi duel is infinitely better anyway
