do you agree /v/?

Both are overmilked shit honestly.

Arenafags are worse than BFfags

>>341523446
>FPS
this >>341523901

dood you dont get it though
battlefield is doing something new by doing something they've already done

it's fucking rad

File: 1463613685306.png (748KB, 820x444px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

748KB, 820x444px

>>341523446
Space COD looks leagues better than battlefield imoddq

>>341523446
It's funny how EA's marketing department is trying everything to make Infinite Warfare look bad on Youtube while their two latest BFs are crap.

>>341524223
Zero G FPS game play is always terrible.

>>341523446
what is this 2006 dead meme bullshit

>>341524919
Shills.

>>341524804
I won't make excuses for it, but WWI on an adrenaline rush and filled with historic revisionism is also a pile of crap.

>>341523901
this 2bh fram

Battlefield normies are the fucking worst. Same shit, different company, but they have to act like their shit is superior.

>lol fucking cod kiddies keep buying the same every year
>fucking casuals cant cope with the skill needed for BF

Honestly, yes. Maybe when Bad Company 2 was out Call of Duty was in a rut, but since BF3 CoD players have just been spending their time enjoying the latest CoD while BF players haven't been able to play their latest EA SJW glitchfest so they've had to spend their time complaining about CoD.

Battlefield is the worst about the mid 2000's realism shit that killed the fps genre. COD however has been fast paced and fun since at least Modern Warfare 2

File: 177401820512.png (63KB, 1128x2904px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

63KB, 1128x2904px

Agreed
>muh big maps