>I'm only getting it because it's the cheapest way to get into 4k Blu-ray
What's wrong with me?
ur dum
fgt
>>341482695
thnx bb
>>341482571
Nothing, it's half the price of a dedicated player here.
>>341483006
exactly, that's like the only reason, and on top of it I guess I get a game console I don't have. But the second it said "4k blu-ray" it peaked my interest, and then when it said "$299" it sold me
>>341482571
i just want the controller
>>341483296
i'm kinda mad I can't buy it and get a custom colored controller for like $30 more, but it's whatever
>no bloodborne
>no death stranding
what's the point of getting an xbone?
>>341483450I already have a PS4, so that's not really an issue
>>341482571
Nothing wrong with that. It's cheap as shit for a 4k blu-ray player
>>341483191
It's a pretty clever sales tactic really. Quite a few people bought a PS3 just because it was the cheapest blu-ray player available at the time as well.
>>341484612
it really fucking is or else I'd pass
>>341484791
I think that's what they were going for, up until now I was just going to wait for the Neo and trade in my PS4 towards it, but Xbox jumping the shark and getting out a 4k player first makes it so much better, and HDR gaming sounds pretty nice too
>>341483450
to have fun with no regard for elitist fags
>>341482571
>bluray
>physical media
>paying for movies
>xbone
u dum
>>341485073
You do realize that every console has elitist groups right? You can't even pretend one is worse than the other.
>>341485246
I'm a cinema fag, i know what I'm doing could be done cheaper.
>>341485246
Enjoy your shit bitrate or downloading 160GB torrents
>tfw want to buy one for pic related in HD with ONLINE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SKKKQgf2o0s
What's wrong with me?
>>341484612
this. 4k blu ray players are expensive as fuck and this one can play games and comes with a really good controller
>>341485643
>comes with a really good controller
i forgot to fucking mention that too, fucking bluetooth? it might replace my PS4 controller as default for controller-reliant games on PC
>>341485618
Oh wow I didn't know about this.
>>341485618
Wait, so instead of finishing the sequel they were working on they're just going to make an HD remaster off the original?
Good.
>>341486046
The one they announced in 2014 was a reboot, not a sequel.
>good
Pretty much. It'd be cool if they're still making the reboot, but I'm not gonna get my hopes up.