lmao

Whoever did the graphic just reduced each dimension by 40%.

>>341269168
>ever trusting microsoft
they are known liars

>>341270294
BUT SONY

>>341269168
i think the person who made the graphic inverted the percentages. that looks 60% smaller

>>341269624
this

god DAMN they are stupid

>>341270547
>>341269624

>>341269624
Exactly, never trust images like this
40% total volume =/= (40%*x)*(40%*y)*(40%*z)

>>341270771
yeh im sure it was a *mistake*

>>341269168
is the person who make the mock-up some intern refugee or what

40% smaller = it's (100%-40%) of the size

holy shit i'm dying

>>341269624
no, they reduced it TO 40%. not BY 40%. theres a difference. that would mean they reduced it BY 60%, as i stated here. >>341270547

>>341271494
no, the dimensions are clearly 40% smaller, giving an overall volume reduction of ~80%

MS really cant help themselves. Bullshit central.

it's just an optical illusion

>>341269168
They graphic is probably adjusted to include the power brick. Since in the One S the power supple is internal