>21 heroes
>Only 6 are competitively viable
Why?
Because 6 makes a whole team.
>>341265885
Because you're bad.
>you will never play 21 vs 21 match where everyone have to play a different hero
what is competative
Because they didn't take TF2's model and try and limit the number of heroes so they could all be refined and somewhat balanced.
Quantity over quality.
>>341265885
>21 heroes
>I'm only good with 6.
Thats what this post is really saying.
It's the same with a majority of competitive games. Lots of characters to choose from, but only a few end up competitively viable.
>widowmaker exists in an otherwise perfectly balanced game
Why?
>>341267338
Because Blizzard WRONGLY presumed that braindead fucking ROADHOGS would do their GOD DAMN JOB and pull her the FUCK down from her fucking exposed perch on Ilios instead of complaining that he's the only one on the fucking site.
>Recently released game
>Isn't perfectly balanced
Why?
>>341266745
>I don't understand that heroes have different abilities and stats, which makes some of them vastly inferior to others regardless of how good you are with said characters.
That's what this post is really saying.
>>341265885
I'd love to hear what you feel are the only viable choices for competition, OP.
We can all laugh at you then.
