Now when gameplay's been released, what does /v/ think of it?
UI is sad, hoping a place holder. Game can look epic, but its clearly alpha still.
>>340936325
Yeah it looked straight from Front.
The only thing I'm hesitant on are the details of vehicles and I'd like to see more maps, but what they showed has my interest.
>>340933893
Too many black people imo. Makes it completely unrealistic.
>>340933893
Looks like a fun WW2 fps
shit like anyone who isn't a retard would have guessed.
>>340936773
Good thing i dont have to suffer that horrible boxart in a digital age.
looking at the gameplay the graphics seem badly downgraded compared to the "ingame footage" trailers.
gameplay seems completely standart bf fare. dont get the excitement.
>we literally want the xbox one dudebro and guetto nigger audience
Dropped. It's literally just CoD with some tanks.
There wasn't a single second with people not sprinting, running and gunning like some generic CoD clone.
>>340933893
Literaly BF4 without red dot sights, to many SMGs, why the fuck would I moove out of BF3/4 ?
They somehow found a way to make the UI even more obnoxious and screen cluttering, the art direction/consistency/authenticity is completely non-existent, and the gameplay looks like more bland, skill-less, casual pandering unlock treadmill bullshit.
But it'll sell millions because of advertising, brand name, and pretty graphics. Looks like a solid 5-6/10.
>>340937342
So every battlefield game since bf2?
>>340937273
I had a similar vibe. Paper airplanes, same shitty mechanics movement and stuff. But the weapons and setting make it worthwhile no? Still not buying until i get hands on the beta.
>>340937567
False flagging faggot stop posting this shit
>>340933893
I think this might be the first game not to run on my old phenom II / 4gb / 7870 machine
Rip
Way too many niggers and poo in the loos
It's fucking World War 1, the greatest war. It wa fought mainly by white people. If they are going to go for historical accuracy why shit up the rest of the cast?
It looks like hot garbage
>finally have animations for entering vehicles
hallelujah
>>340933893
Did look pretty fun. Probably gonna get it.
>>340937452
destruction is like bad company hopefully other than that you dont have any other reasons
Fucking disgusting.
Kill me.
>>340937707
that looked fucking sweet
>>340937707
>those people can't just bail out of vehicle denying you that kill
I fucking hate those kinda people.
Also, its Battlefield. Without gameplay we already new what to expect.
>>340937690
It's gonna have same reqs as Battlefield 4 & SW Battlefront
>>340937567
>4 maps
>>340937698
Poo in loos fought plenty in ww1 actually. The British took them in when they had a shortage of soldiers. So did Aussies and a bit of black pepes
>>340937698
>historical accuracy.
>uses guns issued by the nazis
>>340933893
Too many auto weapons
UI is blantely taken from Battlefront
The fucking female robot voice is totally jarring
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x-HWKnjugDo
Brand new gameplay
>>340937698
>Caring about this shit
>Not caring about the much, much more glaring authenticity issues in the gameplay itself, and all of the equipment/battlefields.
Nigger do you even play video games or are you just one of those butthurt /pol/rinas always getting assblasted when something doesn't push your childish race agenda?
The game is shit, but you're a faggot, which is even worse.
So no chances of snow-laden mountainside warfare between Russian and Turkish teams?
Historical accuracy was the focus, with Jamal the Australian taking center stage
>>340937876
>4maps CURRENTLY REVEALED GOD PLEASE LET THER BE MORE
>>340933893
I think they should have called it "Historic Battlefield according to Hollywood" but thats not quite as catchy.
>>340937567
Please be fake
>>340936947
This. Looks fun, but a missed opportunity to do something fun with trench warfare.
Will this game have that sweet Russian 1895 lever-action 7.62x54R rifle?
>>340938151
>>340937876
>>340937567
Didn't they tell you not to believe everything you see on the internet?
>>340938138
>Australians are the only people in the world to wear stetsons.
>/pol/ in charge of having coherent arguments about historical authenticity.
Stetsons are quite common in the American military, you know. Even to this day.
>>340937525
Don't disrespect 2142.
>>340938009
>caring about historical accuracy in a game about a specific era of warfare
wow fuck me right?
fuck you nigger
Its literally Star Wars Battlefront: Battlefield Edition
Extremely casual, knee-high skill ceiling, SMG hip firing while running - The Game
I honestly predict it go down in the first 6 months like SWB.
This is the new DICE, welcome the bright future of dudebro and urban ghetto gamers
>>340937871
But the graphics look way better than BF4
>>340938359
Nice edit phone user
>>340937698
indians did a fair bit of fighting
niggers like>>340938009, not so much
>Caring about BF1
>>340937342
At the risk of sounding like a shill you're retarded. What would you want them to do? It does not make a good trailer if you
>Do 15 minutes of sniping from the edge of the map
>Sit around waiting for vehicles to spawn
>Sitting in a tight closed map throwing grenades endlessly
>Camping some hard to reach area that stops enemy team from advancing
>Spamming mortars from the corner
>Spawning and dying every 15 seconds
>Blowing up anything that can be destroyed for the sake of map control
>Spawn camping
Gameplay is always vastly different from the trailer and we all know how battlefield games play.
Still, pissed to a degree that they blacked WW1.
>>340933893
Star Wars Battlefront 2.0
>>340938392
Assumed it was an Aussie hat, thanks for the correction. Either way though, black man in the British military in WW1 France fighting alongside whites, yeah, sure thing DICE
>>340938470
Same engine I guess
>>340938504
Yea edited that with Adobe© Photoshop™ Mobile™ edition
I refuse to play any game with niggers in them
>>340937698
They're not going for historical accuracy you dip. They never were. It's a shitty casualised AAA shooter and the only reason you care about this game at all is because you're a casual shitter who cares more about politics in the industry than the games themselves.
>>340937698
Indians were the first people gassed by the Germans.
>>340938423
>Abloo bloo bloo my white genocide
>Ignores the much, much worse problems with the authenticity.
>Ignores the fact that the black troops were actually a thing.
>Thinly-veiled ass-pain over being triggered at the sight of other races.
I retract my statement. You're not a faggot, you're a giant weenie.
>>340938138
FUCKING
NIGGERS
GET
OUT
OF
VIDEO
GAMES
>>340938713
He admitted it!!!!!!!
>>340933893
>automatics
>house-to-house combat
>historically incorrect placement of zeppelins
>low texture draw (from jackfrags video)
only good thing is the UI. else its just a reskinned call of duty with ww1 + ww2 textures
>>340938775
>defending a "shitty casualised AAA shooter" just because you're a nigger
you truly are the bane of the video game industry
>>340937994
>0.45
>that 1 fucking soldier runing with a Lewis gun like it was an AR a with a scope nonetheless
>smg everywhere
I dont even know anymore, I would really have bought this game if it was something new to the franchise, a game where most battles are fought with fucking rifles like in fucking WW1 but no, we have exactly the same gameplay as before, give me a reason to pick this over any modern BF, seriously
>>340938468
Due to the fact that bf4 is still going strong. I dont think so
>niggers in the game
>you can gass them
whats the problem?
>>340933893
WHERE IS THE FUCKING FRENCH?
2 MAPS IN FRANCE AND NO FRENCH
WHATS NEXT?
VERDUN : USA VS GERMA???
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>340938798
>black troops were actually a thing
even assuming this is true (which it isn't), they woudl make up like what? 0.000000001% of the army? But now a nigger is the protagonist of BF1?
>>340938657
You do know that was, in fact, a thing, right? It's one of the few things from this train wreck with any actual roots in reality.
All the forced drama is just /pol/ fags spilling out of their containment board and being [TRIGGERED] like they always are whenever a game, movie, or whatever has black people in it as anything other than a background character.
>>340938392
That's not a stetson, that's a slouch, almost exclusive to the ANZAC in WW1 and 2. Stop acting so informed considering you don't know shit
With the game releasing in october, and the amount of content they have revealed so far, it feels a lot like what happened with Battlefront.
Game will probably look great, it seems to have the "standard" battlefield gameplay, in the end i'll probably get it only when all DLC has been released and the price is lower.
>>340938905
But wait, there's more! Like a soldier running around with a hotchkiss M1909 firing from the hip
>>340938905
>no lock ons
>no spotting (the way it is in bf4)
How is this not superior?
>>340938470
who gives a fuck, gona run it on 1280/720 low so the useless grapical shit stops being a burden anyway
>>340939049
There's more than one protagonist in the BF1 campaign.
>>340938904
How am I defending it? I fucking hate what battlefield has become and the fact people on this board even care about who's in it makes me question whether those people are even interested in video games, because if they were they would know the game's not worth discussing.
>>340939040
becaues given how pushed niggers are in media, they are probably going to make them stronger than everyone else or something
>>340933893
Literally a reskinned WW2 shooter being titled as WW1. Looks no better than the other BF games DICE has been making.
It's not WW1 game that for sure
>>340939306
>more than one
WE ASSUME
>>340939079
Slouch hats do not have a flat top.
>>340939306
niggers shouldn't even be one of the protagonists
I expected AAA quality 64 player Verdun, instead I got reskinned BF4.
>>340939372
doubt it. In the single player maybe
Some air gameplay
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uc3zZyEUKxA
>>340933893
Tanks look really nice. The only thing I'll do in the game is drive a tank desu
>>340939534
>battlefield
>battlefront UI
>WWI
>SMG
>>340939259
>60 bucks for that
>gona be super demanding
>most likely bugged AF
>will be droped by the PC population like Hardline because its an inferior product and can't compare to the refined versions of Battlefied that are 3 and 4
>>340939424
looks more like WW2, they should have done WW2 instead
>>340939306
yes a muslim women riding a horse in the beuduin tribes during the arab revolts of 1914.
how authentic
Black troops were a thing in colonial Africa, eg Namibia campaign.
There were no blacks in the european theater.
>>340939790
having niggers in ww2 would have been just as bad
>>340939049
>Black troops in WW1 weren't a thing
I know you're baiting me, but I can't help but bite. Even if they weren't the main force, what's wrong with a game centering around the units that fought there? There's literally zero problems with that other than you being triggered like some tumblrina complaining about games not being focused on women. You're a fucking joke; How sad and insecure do you have to be that you have to be validated by a game's protagonist? If the character was white or black it'd make literally zero difference. They chose a black regiment because it's not something most games or movies in the setting have ever really touched on and they wanted a(Likely half-assed) attempt at being somewhat unique.
I'd figure you stormfags would actually be fucking estatic at having a game that gives you plenty of opportunity to gun down shitloads of black people in multiplayer.
>>340939871
because it detracts from the real heroes of the war, the white soldiers
>>340939806
not until 1917 and they made up a small percentage of american forces which was already a small percentage of forces on the western front anyway
>>340939079
That's not a slouch you dumb shit.
>ITT: niggers defending niggers in games
>>340939735
>60bucks
I agree its too much
>demanding
I recently got a good pc, you should get one too
>bugged as fuck
Anything but the netcode this time i hope
>pop
I hope not, we cannot know at this time.
>>340933893
WHERE IS THE MOTHEFUCKING FLAMETHROWER
>>340940002
>Being triggered this hard.
Did Jamal fuck your mother, or something?
>>340939668
This
I would prefer to drive WW2 ones however
>>340939871
>what's wrong with a game centering around the units that fought there?
misrepresentation history
they unironically haven't shown a single Frenchman despite france losing almost every single man they had
>>340940178
In WW2?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=19hohCtdJ4Y
>autismo trigger warning
>>340939471
We can't see the top of the hat, so we don't know if it's flat or not and the side of the hat is curved up, also, stetson-style hats weren't used by the British forces.
>>340940441
Everyone but America had Flamethrowers in WW1.
As someone who hasn't touched battlefield since BFBC2
It looks like a re-skin of battlefield 4. Allied or axis the vehicles and weapons were interchangeable. (with allies using German styled tanks and zeppelins, allies using the Gewehr rifles etc)
Only 4 maps, everyone uses fully automatic guns and even the biplanes are just re-skins doing 90 degree upward maneuvers. This isn't even complaining about historical accuracy, or the fact that it's a first world war game that doesn't include the french - the largest allied combatant.
TLDR it looks like a shitty bf4 reskin, no point even making it ww1 except flavour
looked like an okay ww2 game
>>340933893
it really is ww2 game.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bM1YAWXeOJ4
>>340933893
>battlefront with mustard gas
e3 was a mistake
>>340940330
>Misrepresenting history
>By focusing on a lesser known part of it
/pol/ literally on suicide watch with this damage control.
Looks pretty meh, like I expected
>>340940575
waw dis guy blatantly stealing jacks content xD
>>340940527
>>340939471
forgot image
>>340940441
>In WW2?
>>340940152
problem is, this game offers NOTHING significant compared to BF 3/4, by nature WW1 seting is restrictive compared to modern era, but you can use those restrictions at your advantage by shaping the gunplay/ balance in a diferent, never before seen form, but instead of a real change on gameplay, we have the same generic shooter (generic not in a negative sense) but without the posibilities of the modern era, so you end up with this reskin.
I was dissapointed with the weapon selection
While I knew it was going to happen I was still let down
Everyone running around with weapons that had like 5,000 units made and delivered during the war
>>340940672
>By focusing on a lesser known part of it
i doubt many americans even know that france fought in the war.
>>340940527
>We can't see the top of the hat
What? Yes you can, the crown is not folded like a slouch hat is, you can clearly see the crown in that screenshot and it's not at all like shaped like a slouch hat.
>>340938253DAY 1 DLC
What's with the woman voice telling the objectives?
>>340940926
>Trying this hard
>>340940831
You cannot hope for a bigger risk than the setting. If you introduce significant gameplay change as well why call it BF?
>>340940286
Panzer tanks are comfy as fuck
>>340933893
It's unrealistic as hell, I used to wait for hours for artillery to finish pounding then charge with captain's whistle when I was in Verdun. They kept nignogs away from us for obvious reasons. We pitied the guys with machine guns because they become stuck in a matter of seconds because of mud or dirt. Now everyone has machine guns.
Tanks. We don't have tanks going that fast because blitzkrieg was not introduced and tanks usually moved at infantry speed = 4km/hr when not changing positions. All in all, it's a dirty arcadey game that has nothing to do with WW1.
>>340937567
>all these these maps in France
>no French force in game.
Wew
Can't wait for the epic surrender jokes following this post.
>>340941425
>we
>ww1
uhhh...
>>340941451
>>no French force in game
Where are getting this information from? We've only seen a trailer and 3 multiplayer matches on the same map. Why the hell is everyone jumping to conclusions?
>>340941549
He came from the past
everyone stilll sprinting everywhere all the time like in BF3/4.
What a fucking shit, There is no fucking penalty for sprinting so all we get is random people sprinting around, no one is taking cover.
>>340941204
>gimp yourself with a setting that can't be reproduced in an acceptable fashion exept acompanied with massive gameplay change
>only do half of the work, ending with this abortion of a WWII game that lacks the autenticity of WWI AND the possibilities of the modern era shooters
>wonders why its shit
>>340940926
SICK BURN
>>340941031
With many slouches, it is hard see the folded top from the side, which is the angle we have in the screenshot, and with my other point, why the hell would a soldier with a union flag sewn on his arm be wearing a stetson
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dNb9I9vy_gE
ANIMATIONS TO GET IN AND OUT OF VEHICLES WEW LAD
>>340941425
because its a deathmatch with flags.
Maybe in rush?
>>340941549
Are you questioning my historical nerdiness which I accumulated with wikipedia and B class European WW1 movies? I'm an author on WW1, friendo.
>>340941665
Germans had french tanks for some reason(FT-17)
>>340939668
WW1 Tanks are comfy as fuck too
>>340941425
>I'm literally retarded and expected DiCE to make an extremely accurate and realistic WW1 experience
Vault a wall in half a second. Pull out and toss grenade even less than that. Man this game got arcady.
Does anyone else hope there's cross platform okay between consoles?
>>340936869
WUZ
>>340941739
I'm not counting it out yet. Seems fun. I wont condemn it before i play it.
>>340941758
It's not directly from the side though, you see the front and the side in the screenshot, and from the front there would definitely be a triangular shape because of the folded crown which is just not there, so it can't be a slouch hat. As to why he has a stetson? Well why does everyone have fucking SMGs and prototype weapons?
>>340941838
>pre-alpha
should i buy this on pc or xbone lads?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dNb9I9vy_gE
>doom49
>>340941789
>WW1 tanks
>Comfy
The fuck are you on about?
It kinda feels like Bad Company 2.
Chaos, destruction is there which is fun. The only issue is 4 maps. WHY.
Also, merk posted some gameplay too
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x-HWKnjugDo
Also check out this fucking nigga
everything is too fast. the guns fire to fast, the people run to fast, the tanks drive to fast, it doesn't make it feel like a ww1 game, just a modern war game with re-textured guns and vehicles
>>340942071
pc ofc
>>340942071
Get it on whatever your friends are getting it on
If no friends, then PC
>>340941838
Why are people being so picky about WWI game taking liberties on historical accuracy for gameplay reasons while not having a problem with WWII games doing to the same shit for 20 years?
>black soldiers are a red herring,
>/pol/lacks fall for it
lol
I thought WW1 mostly had trench warfare with very very little automatic and semi-auto weapons save for mounted MGs?
What the fuck?
The hype for this game is probably the hype I understand the least ever. All recent battlefield games have not only been boring but also broken as fuck on releaseé
>>340940475
Fuck yeah Ian.
>>340941304
>Panzer tanks
>>340942257
>4maps
ugh oh, getting Battlefront vibes. Not good.
Watching snoop dogg playing is like revisiting polygon doom video.
Looks nothing like a WW1 fps.
NO FRANCE IN A GAME ABOUT FUCKING WW1
AND A FUCKING BURGER NIGGER ON THE COVER
>>340942257
>Also check out this fucking nigga
Seeing Snoop being a stoned retard while playing a video game isn't exactly a good impression of said video game.
>>340942571
>cant get out of the trench
what a retarded nigga
>>340942681
There's a French Renault FT in the video.
It has literaly nothing to do with World War 1
>>340942479
People really like explosions
>>340933893
Air and nigger based combat. So original. 10/10
>>340940672
But the French perspective is a lesser known one for most people, yet they still insist on shoving niggers into every crevice
>>340942571
>Polygon's DOOM video
good times, my sides still remember
>>340942441
Trench warfare is mostly a meme. And by that I mean that it wasn't just a standoff on European plains. There absolutely were close quarter battles fighting for control of towns and cities. But trench definitely dominated since 19th century line tactics dominated military dogma at the time.
That said, this game looks like shit. Automatic weapons were certainly a thing, but really only saw large-scale implementation towards the very end of the war. What I saw was a BF3/4 reskin. Very disappointed.
>all these assblasted goobergators
Shouldn't you be on the other chan?
>>340942828
And also the Hotchkiss M1909
>>340942828
probably because the britard or the germancuck are using them , bet dice will not include the french, or later in a fuckind dlc
american """"""""""""""education"""""""""""""""
>>340940926
Stop memeing. Americans are well aware of the fact France was in WWI. They were the guys we rescued.
>>340942754
Nothing against snoop, if I were as stoned as he was I would love any game thrown at me.
>>340942441
depends on the theater, there wasn't much trench warfare in the east or Mesopotamian front
>>340942267
I would think of something along these lines.
really to answer OP, looking at BF1 has made me wish for a AoS with decent graphics and improved game-play (possibly using something like space-engineers terrain, so vehicles can drive over it.). sort of like red orchestra with space-engineers terrain or something (maybe with place-ables or something)
I expected something more red orchestra than call of duty. Everybody moves too fast doing parkour and shit, but oh well.
Looks fun tbqh.
>>340943217
>"""""""""""""
Our memes are getting worse.
>>340933893
It's a battlefield game that's as arcadey as 1942. In other words you portrays all of WWI with the same realism and polish that you'd get if you had the average American high schooler describe WW1. Only they didn't add trenches because they don't want the casual babbies crying that they can't run and gun like the other BF titles.
It's WWI for someone who has no interest in WWI. It's BF that isn't Modern Military or WWII. So it's a BF that will stand out and easily sell a shitload. So it's a brilliantly marketed product that will get enough people believing in it to make it a smashing success.
I'll probably treat it like BF4 and wait to buy it when all 17 of it's dlc and premium shit is on sale and bundled together.
N I G G E R S
I
G
G
E
R
S
>>340937342
Only a pathetic shit would ever take multiplayer games seriously, it looks pretty and that's literally all there is to give a shit about.
>>340943258
>he thinks American schools teach history
>>340942131
>enter/exit animations
>>340943376
The game has trench warfare.
>>340939735
BF hardline was dropped because it has no replayability whatsoever, it wasn't even made by dice.
https://www.battlefield.com/games/battlefield-1/maps
>all those faggots complaining about 4 maps
there will be more you faggots
>post yfw when they have the Armenian Genocide and Turkey bans BF1
>>340942257
>>340942567
https://www.battlefield.com/games/battlefield-1/maps
There will be more maps revealed soon, thats what "Check back for more" means you retards.
>>340938601
> all those points
You mean, almost like a red orchestra-light? Because I'd be all over that shit.
In the mean time bf4 is 5$ and so is hardline
WHAT ABOUT MAKING A GAME ABOUT VIETNAM WITH ONLY FRENCH AND VIET
HOW WOULD YOU ALL FEEL ABOUT THAT YOU CUNT?
>>340940178
>>340940532
They had them on that first teaser trailer, they also had ships.
>>340942257
There's going to be more than 4.
From their site:
>These, obviously, aren't the extent of what's going to be available. They're just a taste, and we'll update these pages as we approach the October 21 release
>>340941787
why though, its not like the germans didn't have their own light tank. can dice not do a simple google search
>>340933893
>Burning zeppelin crashes and explodes on several houses
>Houses are unscathed
>>340943616
Honestly do you think its worth it for me to buy Hardline?
>>340942828
with british insignia on it
all maps descriptions mention the factions fighting there. until now you have brits germans, italians and austrians confirmed.
i don't expext them to have the french, we're 4 months to release now...
>>340943823
For $5? I guess. The multiplayer has some merit.
>>340943823
not on PC, its a ghost town, bf3 has like 3 and a half time the playerbase of Hardline
>>340943823
I play Hardline all the time and I've had a lot of fun.
Can't say you would too, but I like it.
>>340939424
Yeah , its in colors, everybody knows the world was black and white at the time
>>340943969
I dunno. Probably naive of me, but I am still unable to imagine a WWI game without France. France will be in the final version.
>>340944049
>bf3
Gross
>>340943969
Ignoring the french in ww1 is like ignoring the fucking soviet in ww2.
Also america was almost absent in this war.
This make me mad.
>>340942257
>that futuristic womans voice telling you about the game
what the fuck? why isn't it some male/female down a shakey terrible voice box or something, that is so fucking immersion breaking
>>340942441
trench warfare was mostly a western front, italian front, and gallipoli phenomenon, the eastern, african, and middle eastern fronts didn't have it as much. you're absolutely right about the automatic weapons though, there were very few, and they were only used late in the war in very limited numbers. almost all mgs were crew served, and none of them could be fired from the shoulder while standing like in the game.
Why the FUCK is there a female AI voice for objectives and shit? Why can't your teammates' soldier just scream it out automatically?
>>340941665
Go on the battlefield website and look up the detail of the maps.
It's always germany vs brits. There's no France
>>340943969
The French played an absolutely huge part in WW1. It's like forgetting about the USA in a WW2 game.
Nothing about this game makes me more furious than no fucking France
>>340943540
good, turks are menace to battlefield multiplayer
>>340943601
That's pretty much the experience of every battlefield game. Mostly just camping and being really cheap.
Rarely do you see conflicts like you do in the trailers, everyone's scattered and taking pot shots at each other anyway and the biggest menace is vehicles both the enemies and your own because your own is never where they're needed most and you need one to get anywhere or spend like 10 minutes running to get shot by a sniper on a mountain all the way over by enemy spawn.
>>340944610
Trench warfare didn't exist in the easy cos the Germans had plurality in firepower, Russian trenches would become ready made tombs since the Russians simply could not match German artillery output
>>340944676
this, it's like fucking tf2 or some shit
Whos idea was that
>>340944792
It's like forgetting about the USA in a WW2 game.
The soviet union did most of the fucking work in the wwII, fuck off burger shit.
Stop considering your hollywood movies like educational programs.
>>340944792
USA is a bad comparison, France was more like the Soviets like what this guy said >>340944468
They were the huge megalith which soaked up all the fury of an entire empire's industrial might but continued to fight and hold an entire war despite facing merciless invasion. This is why the "le french are cowards" meme is so shit and hated and why not having France is a slap in the face to the war.
>>340945219
Not a Burger, never implied Murrica won WW2. But saying they didn't [play a large part in the victory, especially in the West is ludicrous.
That's why I compared to France, didn't play the biggest, but damn sure played an important role.
No france no buy dice, eat a dick
Is it me or do people forget this is PRE-ALPHA?
>>340945690
It's a feautre complete beta with "pre-alpha" slapped on it. Release is 4 months away.
>>340945690
anon is this your first rodeo? they just say that but this is the final product, it's out in 3 months. ea always do a """""PRE-ALPHA"""" gameplay that looks exactly the same as final cut
tricks the average consumer into WOW IF THIS IS PRE-ALPHA IMAGINE THE REAL THING! etc
>>340945690
Have you been living under a rock?
Footage shown at E3's either stays the same or gets worse. In Battlefield games it tends to stay the same.
>>340945690
During development is literally the best time to complain about a game. It's the only time any drastic changes can be made.
>>340945219
>Did most of the fucking work
Using American-manufactured materiel and munitions.
The United States' industry was unparalleled at the time, the lend-lease was pretty fucking crucial to the war effort
That's not to say Russia wasn't the primary opponent of the Germans of course, but America contributed a fuckton
looked amazingly fun
I hope they tone down the UI and wallhack stuff a bit though
guys there was a lack of prone in that livestream
has battlefield gone full battlefront? don't tell me theres no prone in this god damn it dice
>>340933893
>Treating heavy machine guns as assault rifles
I fucking knew it.
>>340946128
There probably is just probably nobody is doing it because nobody want's to be a camping faggot in the limited time they have to play it.
>>340945292
there were very few true irrelevant nations in WW1, nobody really gave up quickly
heck even countries like say Belgium put up a good fight
>>340946128
>All vehicles and equipment are randomly distributed powerups
>No classes
>>340945397
Not a Burger, never implied Murrica won WW2. But saying they didn't [play a large part in the victory, especially in the West is ludicrous.
I'm just salty when I think about Russia almost never credited in the mind of the standard amerifat, even after loosing 8 to 10 000k mens in the WWII, everyone talke about the american "savior of Europe ".
And this shit with bf1 feel the same, but with the french.
Someone nuke america.
>>340945912
You realise that this contribution is similar to 'jews selling poor quality bread during famine'?
Actual help would've been opening western front in 1942.
>>340933893
It looks fun as hell, but it doesn't fit WW1 very well. Automatics everywhere, no trenches from what I've seen so far, and some type of glowing sight for the Lewis gun. Kinda dissapointed. I hope they make it so that automatics are harder to get than bolt actions and shit or just make bolt-actions as balanced as slower-firing guns. I want it to be more accurate to WW1. Also, that fucking female announcer. Fix it, Dice.
https://youtu.be/MkRcvtGE90Q
>>340946128
BF:BC2 had no prone and it was amazing
>>340945690
Is there any AAA game wich did change in big ways after pre-alpha?
Dunno, cant think of any at the moment.
>>340946382
thing is a lot of western europe got personally saved by the US troops, and directly after WWII we had the cold war with all its propaganda
its kinda hard to undo more than 50 years of that
>>340945690
Marketing bollocks, use "pre-alpha" and the shittiness of your game can be defended by idiots. What you're looking at is by far and large the final game.
>>340945690
Putting pre-alpha makes you think there's still a lot of room for improvement. But don't be fooled, the game releases in 4 months, this is what you'll get in october with very few tweaks
Looks pretty cool. Will definitely play the beta.
>>340946382
>WHY DOES NOBODY LOVE RUSSIA?
>WHY AREN'T EVERYONE SUCKING VLAD COCK LIKE MY COMMUNIST FRIENDS?!
Red scare happened almost immediately after the war and we've had a cold war with them ever since. It's a mostly silent rivalry.
Pussies in Europe wouldn't understand.
Fucking hell, it's like the last BF in a different setting.
I hoped for what I got in the teaser or somewhat more chaotic where two sides shoot each other before closing in and going full on melee or shotgun.
So much for all that teamplay bs dice was shilling.
>>340946406
Yeah the announcer just didn't fit at all. I too was hoping for more bolt action guns but I'm sure there would be too many kids that would find it boring. I hope bolt action rifle is at least an option for non-sniper classes. I always love playing with that type of gun in RO2.
>>340943793
you clearly never watched the stream.
>>340946549
This Europoors were slurping up that American Freedom after we liberated them and protected them from the iron curtain.
How come the planes fly like WW2 fighter planes?
Most of these planes would not even go over a Toyota
>>340946829
>Pussies in Europe wouldn't understand.
>Europe never lived in fear of the USSR being on their very doorstep
>>340945912
>Using American-manufactured materiel and munitions.
That only really applies in specific areas like trucks (40% of Soviet trucks were made in America and even then USA trucks had problems handling harsh conditions). Soviet union wasn't even the biggest beneficiary of Lend-lease
>that woman announcer voice
I don't usually know what the fuck I'm listening too, but when I do, I don't
that better be placeholder dice
>>340944581
>>340944676
placeholder?
>>340947017
>How come the planes fly like WW2 fighter planes?
Same reason jets in BF2 flying like WW2 fighter planes.
>>340946401
>>340945912
what about never delivering the ammo and vehicles we ordered ( the french ) in the WWII?
We had to fight the german with fucking non-automatic rifles, guess why we have surrendered? The maginot line fiasco was the cherry on the top but still it's not completely our fault.
>>340946958
>Iron curtain
> protected from
??
>>340936773
>>340937342
>>340937698
>>340937889
>>340937938
>>340938138
>>340938190
>>340938846
>>340939424
>>340942681
ITS A FUCKING VIDEO GAME NOT AN HISTORICAL DOCUMENTARY. THEY CAN DO WHAT THE FUCK THEY WANT.
If every single character was an african-American firing laser beams would it change the GAMEPLAY? No.
Now shut the fuck up. The game will be fun, buy it, play it and don't use it as a source for an historical material. Simple
>>340947052
>Europe never lived in fear of the USSR being on their very doorstep
Yeah, you're welcome.
>>340947253
I don't remember jets in BF2 being as slow as the ones in 1942
>>340947289
>>340946401
We weren't exactly rooting for you troglodyte bolsheviks either. We didn't draft up operation unthinkable because we were fucking bored, Ivan.
>>340947336
m8 I grew up in the Cold War, I was in the RAF during the 80's. You're talking a load of shite.
>>340947323
It won't be fun
I'm not buying it
Its that simple
>>340941304
>>340941789
>comfy
>tanks
theyre made of metal and the crew was constantly cramed and extremely uncomfortable what the fuck does comfy even mean
>>340947323
>If every single character was an african-American firing laser beams would it change the GAMEPLAY? No.
Yes, you'd no longer have a WW1 game and instead have star wars.
>>340947323
If you say you are taking risks by doing a WW1 game, then you better stick to your words and go through that challenge
>>340933893
Its literally BF3/4 with a WW1 skin
>>340947323
it's people like this why history will die a painful, horrific death and everything true will be abolished and tarnished
don't weep for the dead, weep for the living
Who the fuck is in charge of the music for these trailers?
You know what screams WW1 and HYPE to me? The BF theme rendered nearly unrecognizable under bad movie preview dubstep and WE UHN CHANGE THE WORLD (x50). Yeah, that's what I wanted. Thanks.
>>340942520
Tank Tanks
>>340947323
>modern bf
>good or fun
kys my man,the last good bf was bf2 and bf 2142.
>>340947441
They weren't. As much.
Point I was making that planes and jets are either sped up or slowed down to a more manageable speed. So they can fit on an infantry map.
They might speed up a WW1 fighter plane so dogfighting isn't boring.
>>340947589
I can't wait to shoot down cobras with javelins in BF1.
>>340947323
> every single character was an african-American firing laser beams would it change the GAMEPLAY? No.
It is a videogame called Battlefield 1 and the major setting is world war one. Of course fucking laser beams would affect how the game feels. Any weapon that doesn't feel like a WW1 weapon is wrong.
The same goes for maps, factions, vehicles, player characters, etc.
Wasn't it very clear when it was announced that they said it was going to be an alternate history?
Why are you retards going crazy over inaccuracies when they already literally said ti would be innacurate?
BF4 with a reskin.
They need to change the gameplay more.
>>340947761
It's /v/ , you know what happens.
>>340947626
you're not the target audience anon
think who ea are trying to sell too
it looks fun tbqh famalam
i hope the campaign isnt absolute dog shit though
>>340947761
Uh, the exact opposite
They said that it WASN'T going to be alternative history
>>340947557
heh
>>340947493
The other battlefield games were fun, you just sound like a boring sack of shit
>>340947557
It would still be set in ww1. Characters don't matter at all.
>>340947559
They are doing it and putting their own spin on it. Race literally doesnt matter in this case.
>>340947618
I just said it is not an historical source. Its a fucking game. Are we going to use Halo and Mass Effect as scientific predictions of the future? Are we going to use Dynasty Warriors as a historic source?
>>340937525
>>340943418
Looks like some retards never played battlefield 4. It's not run and gun, and no CQC dlc like BF3.
Not WWI
No buy
>>340947761
because if you're going to take that much liberties with something still presenting it as a WW1 is dishonest
if they were truly upfront about it they'd announce it publicly as an alternate history shooter
>>340947856
black people don't play first person shooters and the ones that do won't give even the slightest shit about what music you put in the trailer because they're all listening to actual fucking rap at full blast while they browse youtube videos on their phones
Battlefield series is shit, but the series has never been historically accurate at all.
>The BAR was the weapon for the American assault class in BF1942
>>340947626
Actually, the BF1 stream a month ago had the normal battlefield theme playing, but they both sounded completely new
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CnWJ_JHVKuA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d9nZYDqSCdg
>>340947967
I don't give a shit about race
what I do care about are the main characters of the game: the guns
Just cause I put some shit on the game doesn't mean it is weighted on the color of one man's skin.
I care more about people using a gun that only saw up to 1000 copies being made in mass as well as sights that were never made in the era.
That shit is not right
And before you say, "But that shit was also in BF, BF2, 3, 4
I was still pissed about that shit too, not so much with BC, cause that one IS an alternative history.
These trailers keep painting Germans in WW1 as bad people, and I don't think I like that too much. I'm no stormfag, but the Germans literally did nothing wrong in WW1.
https://youtu.be/4pY3hlQEOc0
Looks fine so far, but I'd really like to see gameplay on some other maps. Something with more trenches, perhaps.
The dynamic weather looks nice.
Gun noises seem to have a good amount of oomph behind them.
The Cortana-esque announcer is definitely jarring, but it's probably a placeholder.
Obviously it's not going to be totally realistic regarding weapons, but Battlefield games aren't exactly known for historical accuracy.
All in all, I'm optimistic. Not going to pre-order, obviously, but it does look fun.
>be DICE
>Talk about taking risks and how the gameplay encourages working as a team
>show teasers with melee combat and talked about it
>Gameplay reveal time
>Just like Battlefield 4 in a WW1 skin
>Run n gun
>No group cohesion and coordination
>So much auto weapons that all that melee shit doesn't even matter
>>340945912
>China
>0
Is it just due to lack of data resulting for the civil war?
>>340948272
>I care more about people using a gun that only saw up to 1000 copies being made in mass as well as sights that were never made in the era.
Did you care about BF2 using a shotgun only 3 models were made up.
Genuinely curious.
>>340948106
Its not being dishonest if they aren't saying its 100% historically accurate depiction of WW1 combat.
>>340948336
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Rape_of_Belgium
Germans were savages that got off lightly in Versailles
>>340948336
They did nothing wrong in ww2 too anon, the bad side actually won
>>340947521
>Not wanting to roll across the battlefield causing death and destruction from the safety of an iron monster.
It's kinda like shitposting but instead of posting memes from the safety of you home, you're filling dirty allied soldiers with lead from the comfort of your tank.
>>340948462
>>340948272
Yes, the Jackhammer was annoying as fuck and I thought it was a waste of a slot for more authentic guns.
>>340948336
>literally raped Belgium
>>340948336
Displaying Germans as the bad guys isn't the problem, it's displaying the Entente as the good guys
>Germans literally did nothing wrong in WW1
Blank Check and Belgium. But again, the Entente did equally fucked up shit during the war.
>>340948472
they're going WORLD WAR 1 SHOOTER*
*actually not based on WW1
>>340939626
>crosshair in third person
>>340938601
Even Verdun which is quite realistic doesnt play that boring.
>>340948573
WW1 era tanks were superheated metal coffins
>>340948568
If the Soviets hadn't won WW2, Mao wouldn't have won the Chinese Civil War, and he wouldn't have starved 50+ million people to death.
rly makes u think
It's almost like they were so scared of doing WW1 that the only way they could justify it and not feel like they would alienate everybody is by making the game as arcade run and gun as possible. In actual fact the majority of people would like something a little slower paced and different.
>>340948336
Rape of Belgium, mate.
>>340948573
>>Not wanting to roll across the battlefield causing death and destruction from the safety of an iron monster.
Two grenades and your tank is destroyed, doesnt matter though as they move at 30 MPH so you can get back quickly.
>>340942257
nah man, they dont even have a desert thing in there so there has to be more.
>>340948336
There's a French soldier in an Adrian helmet in that trailer, so I guess you can play as the French, they just haven't announced the maps for it.
mite b cool
titan mode when
>>340948272
Its a game. Doesnt matter about fucking guns. It would be boring with single shot rifles you have to reload after ever shot. It needs to be majority automatic guns or its a piece of shit
>>340948776
Beats dying in the mud,
>>340949075
I never said both sides weren't bad
WW1 is kind of morally gray
>>340937994
>that female voice that just cuts in
>no staticy radio voiceovers
>no sound of your comrades dying in the distance screaming in pain
guess i'll just have to stick to bad company 2
>>340949054
That's a common Helmet style for WW1 m8. The Belgians and the Russians used it too.
French WW1 uniform was blue
So are the Canadians included? Passchendaele is my favourite battle of the war.
>>340949075
Entente were not good guys sure, but Germany was worse than them, by quite a bit even.
Unless course you're one of /his/'s resident prussiaboo's that tries to blame WW1 on everyone but germany to the point of justifying what happened to Belgium
>>340948336
>invading a neutral country
>innocent
>>340947557
There's no lasers or black majority though.
>>340948858
this.
it's like battlefront from the looks of it, run and gun, I wanted a slow paced game, maybe that was just the map and on conquest though? who knows
>>340949273
Doubt it m8, The French aren't even in it and they played one of the biggest parts of the War.
>>340941789
>comfy
Illiterate retards have destroyed the meaning of this word
>>340948371
We need a 1910s balladeer for the announcer.
>>340949130
>It would be boring with single shot rifles you have to reload after ever shot
That ain't how bolt actions work in the slightest
The difference between Bolt, Single, and Auto is how the gun fed and cycle the bullet
Bolt: Manual Cycle
Semi: mechanical cycle single pull
Auto: Mechanical cycle assisted by access gas from the gun, so you could fire your gun simply by holding down the trigger.
All guns have to reload in the same aspect where you had to insert new rounds, just depends on how you do it.
>>340949054
It's probably an Italian, they're one of few confirmed factions.
>>340948981
>2 Grenades
Have ever even played a battlefield game before?
>>340949458
>doesn't know dlc is laready planned
>>340941789
>Slow moving boxes of death that broke down every 10 feet, were so loud that troops inside almost went death
>Were so hot that the crews often just passed out
>Often filled with exhaust fumes, killing the crew
>Comfy
u fuckin wot m8
>>340949315
/his/ hates Germany, what are you on about?
>>340946128
I thought I saw a guy go prone when he was low on HP. It looked like he was crawling.
>>340946336
But it's not you fucking retard frogposter
>>340939626
>air gameplay
I take it back. I don't want a WW1 Battlefield.
I want a Battlefield set in some period of history where the wars had no air units beyond observation balloons so that I don't have to deal with wannabe TOP GUNS taking a chunk out of the team count while they uselessly roll around in the sky. I don't care if you put WW1 tanks in the Napoleonic era, just leave the airchavs out.
>>340941707
This is modern shooter. Deal with it or kill yourself like I'm going to do.
>>340949407
That shit wasn't even conquest
They were earning points, not ticket drain
WW1: WW2 edition.
>>340949580
Well here's the insignias on the side of the tank that goes in with them, maybe someone more knowledgeable can figure out what country it is.
>>340949678
The last time a Battlefield game added new factions was BF2.
I doubt they'd do it again.
>>340949813
to be fair proper WW1 planes would have the very satisfying option of fairly reliably shooting planes out of the sky as infantry
>enter/exit animations and delays
>vehicle seat switching animations and delays
thank god
>>340949317
They were pretty much dragged into the war by Austria because Austria was their ally. It wasn't their fault.
>>340949579
>: Mechanical cycle assisted by access gas from the gun
not all automatic weapons are gas blowback, the difference between automatic and semi-automatic is mostly the trigger assembly
>>340949946
Looks like an Italian Tank.
>>340950174
Got me there
Yeah.
There was something about the protagonist that bothered me but I couldn't put the finger on it. And then it struck me :he looks like brendan fraser
>>340950118
>Austria was their ally.
They were not. Germany had a defensive pact with Austria-Hungary, but was not obligated to support them in an offensive war against Serbia. They did it anyway.
>>340950118
>Germany was seeking an alliance with Britain before WW1 broke out
I wonder how different the World would be today if UK was allied with Germany in WW1, our Kings were Cousins too.
>>340937567
> empire's edge
> adriatic coast
> not gallipoli
ONE JOB
>>340950005
still the best battlefield
>>340950539
would have never lasted
the british foreign policy had always been to prevent any mainland empire from consolidating the continent
>>340950005
BC2 Vietnam
>>340949054
it's an italian, they used their version of the french helmet.
Map is most likely the alps one that has been announced
>>340950279
12 Isonzo maps confirmed?
>>340949946
looks like green white red, which would be italian fiat 3000, which was for all intensive purposes, an renault ft knockoff
>>340936325
>game looks epic
>epic
/v/ is fucking dead, kys fucking reddit trash get off my board fucking normies REEEEE
>>340933893
It's just a reskin... WOW A BLIMP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! That's blowing me away!!!! Because that's not just a C-130
What kind of retard buys into this?
>>340933893
As someone who is very interested in wwi I was cautiously optimistic. They could have captured the chaos of the western front with thousands of shells dropping for hours, charges over the top of trenches. Constant deformation of landscape from all the shells. Methodical use of bolt action firearms.
Instead we get a ww2 ww1 game. Smgs everywhere. Not hype not hype at all
>>340948272
>I care more about people using a gun that only saw up to 1000 copies being made in mass as well as sights that were never made in the era.
But that still makes the guns historically accurate. That was a point that DICE has made. They can't make it WW1 AS IT HAPPENED. With accurate weapon representation. Why? That shit would be boring as fuck and would not make a mechanically engaging game.
As for the sights? What fucking sights are you talking about? WW1 saw various types of sight systems used by all sides.
>>340950539
>our Kings were Cousins too.
Yeah, no shit
Every King was Cousins with each other by that point, all of them were inbred fuckers.
>>340951110
Aperture rear sights
Looks great
>>340950925
Same feels here.
At the very least, I expected tradeoffs for using autoweapons such as higher recoil, having to fire them still without moving in the case of machine guns or smgs being effective in mid to close range.
I expected that there would be more showcase of the melee combat DICE talked about before or more teamplay where we see squads of soldiers duking it out before closing in on each other and going melee.
>>340943027
What happened in it?
Mod support; if DICE includes this at release I'll buy it.
>>340933893
>that pistol grip bolt action
Just fuck my historical accuracy up senpai
It's hardly WW1 at all. It's a stylized version of it and i'm okay with that. The destruction looks great and the massive zeppelins are cool as fuck
they should take all the money and time they blew on this shit and give it to the verdun dev team. shit would be so cash
>>340948206
The P38 was the sidearm of the Japanese
The MP18 was the soviet SMG
The T-34-76 was actually a T-34-85
and so on
>>340948336
There's absolutely nothing in that trailer that shows the Germans being bad, unless you think that showing the player character as even being entente at all makes you all butthurt. Which it probably does.
>>340951853
Didn't they have both the 76 and the 85?
Wasn't the russian smg the ppsh?
>>340936773
>>340937342
>>340937698
>>among others
>muh historical accuracy
>not caring that in OP's pic, there is a bolt action with vertical pistol grip, stick grenade cluster bomb, and a gas mask not used by ANY infantry
retards
>>340952104
>Wasn't the russian smg the ppsh?
thats the point
>>340939626
>Dat framerate
Bwahahahahaha
>>340940002
You know that each mission of the singleplayer campaign is going to focus on a different character right? Oh wait, you don't because you're a asspained outrage vector.
>>340936773
>>340933893
Seriously though, I just watched some of the multiplayer gameplay on youtube and every 3rd guy is black.
This is basically revisionist history WW1.
>>340952189
the bolt-action is a anti-tank rifle of the germans but downsized for whatever reasons
>>340939806
Herp derp I'm an illiterate /pol/tard
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Senegalese_Tirailleurs
>>340952104
In game there was the T-34-85 and the T-34-76
but the T-34-76 in game was basically a T-34-85 with smaller barrel
>>340952325
its probably kit specific or random
>>340952104
>Wasn't the russian smg the ppsh?
In real life it was.
I care about anything else other than this right fucking here
>>340952189
>stick grenade cluster bomb
thats just a m24 stielhandgranate with 6 others tied on, its a real thing
>>340943106
>But trench definitely dominated since 19th century line tactics dominated military dogma at the time.
Wasn't it more that trenches dominated because when they tried bayonet charges at the start of the war everyone got fucked by machine guns and artillery. French lost like 30,000 guys in one day at the Battle of the Ardennes. You're right that this whole game looks daft though, it's not recognisable to any WW1 history I've studied. No drum fire, no buy.
>>340952543
It looks good except that shit interface. Holy fuck it's bad, reminds me way to much of shitty battlefront
>>340952543
>animation for transitioning into vehicles
>>340933893
Looks better than Battlefield 3 and 4. I'll buy it unless it releases with only 4 maps
>>340952515
thats not an mp 18, its an mp34. mp18 used 32 rnd drum magazines that were designed for the luger
>>340952648
The war started out with a bunch of battles that didn't involve trenches, after a bunch of losses on both sides the germans and french/brits both tried to find openings in the lines for counter attacks, this led to a great race to the sea and led to the creation of the trenches. The germans built the trenches to hold onto territory they captured and the french/brits made quick shittier trenches because they planned to make pushes through the german lines. Turns out there was just a massive stalemate but by the end of the war with new tactics and new technology there was more battles that were akin to WW2 style of warfare. WW1 being all trenches is a misconception, they were a massive part of it but there were plenty of urban battles and battles without trenches.
>>340952775
that's good though. it stops all the shitters who drive around in fucking buggies that instantaneously swap to the gunner position to kill you and switch back to the driver seat to fuck of at fucking 200 mph
>>340953178
Dude it's blowing my fucking mind
>>340933893
How is this game any different than Battlefront other than setting?
>>340949259
Anyone you see wearing an adrian helmet in bf1 is italian
>>340953050
It's an MP18, the MP38 loads magazines from the bottom not from the side.
>>340952543
holy shit that looks incredible
>>340953473
64 players
It's actually a battlefield game and not some scaled down bullshit thing
>>340952543
>>340952775
IT TOOK THE BATTLEFIELD SERIES 14 YEARS TO IMPLEMENT THIS SHIT GOD DAMN
I'M HYPE
>>340953647
i said mp 34 not 38
Seriously, if you want a semi-realistic ww1 shooter just play Verdun, it was literally made for history autists and gun enthusiasts
1st there were black troops. Colonial troops fought on both sides. Mostly french and British.
What I want is Russian and Austrian troops too. ot just french, British, American and germans. That would get boring. Hoping for some Russian vs turks. Russian vs Austrians.
>>340953647
Whoops, I apparently read MP34 as MP38 in your post. Still not an MP34 because the magazine is not at an angle, it just sticks out straight and the bolt matches the MP18 style not the MP34.
the main question is
WILL IT BE SUB 1080P ON CONSOLES?
i can only play fps with a controller so i need to know.
>>340953956
But it plays like shit you stupid faggot
>>340933893
Looks pretty good. As long as it has enough maps and doesn't crash it'll be fun. Maybe EA and DICE have gotten their shit together after the failed launches of Battlefield 4 and Battlefront.
>>340953978
Why would you want americans in ww1?
>>340954227
>plays like shit
Why, because you cant run and gun like a shitlord?
>>340954227
Casual detected
>>340942071
PC games die in months. Console go strong because not many options. Whatever your friends do
>>340954295
To play as all factions.
>>340954227
it plays fine now, they ironed out all the optimization problems
>>340954403
>go prone
>clipping everywhere
>movement feels clunky as fuck
>>340950839
>people like thing
>I don't like thing
>gotta shitpost
>>340952543
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uc3zZyEUKxA
>HD Source
HOLY FUCK THAT SOUND DESIGN AND MID AIR TRANSITION, I AM HYPE
but that voice announcer is annoying as fuck, should a be a commanding officer screaming t'ill my ears bleed
>>340954634
Is it me or does the framerate look off?
>>340933893
/v/, will you allow me to play and possibly enjoy the game, please? i'm begging you.
>>340954151
You can use controllers on PC, they were doing it on the BF1 stream earlier
>>340954774
If you find this game entertaining you are literally human trash
>>340937994
What the fuck is this.
I mean what the fuck is this.
What relevance does this have to The Great War?
Fuck all that's what.
Disgusting, I will not buy.
>>340954443
it's literally the opposite of that you retard, console games have no fucking lifespan and get their servers closed all the fucking time
>>340933893
Looks better than BF4 and Battlefront. Lots of historical inaccuracies, though. I'm not autistic though so I still think it looks cool and will buy it as long as its not short on maps
>>340954151
BF3/4/Hardline/Battlefront have all been 1280x720 on XB1 and 1600x900 on PS4. I don't see why it would be different.
>World War 1 game
>Everyone is using experimental prototype smgs and lmgs instead of the rifles that fucking dominated the course of the war, and shaped the future of firearms forever, such as the Lee Enfield, Gewehr 98, Springfield, Colt M1911, Winchester, Mosin Nagant, a multitude of strictly MOUNTED machine guns, etc.
This is a travesty. I'm not saying they have to do trench warfare exclusively, but everyone will just be using smgs and lmgs, with occasional semi auto rifles and snipers, but very few will use a non scoped bolt action or pull out their pistol.
This is why RO2 got it right with weapon limitations on sides.
>>340946950
Nope, just the gameplay trailer. Will the houses destruct properly?
>>340955095
It's both. Sometimes console gamers stick with a game when PC gamers abandon it (Star Wars: Battlefront). Other times It's PC gamers playing a years old game while console gamers abandon it.
>>340955094
were you expecting a military sim from a fucking Battlefield game or something?
>>340955371
Looks like the houses exploded into rubble when the blimp crashed.
>>340955371
yes, during the stream earlier the zeppelin fell on a bunch of houses and leveled all of them
>>340955281
Nobody would play it if it wasn't a frantic hyped version of WW1. This is the only way they can do it properly
>>340955407
Is it really so bad to desire a game that actually represents the kind of combat that took place in the period its based on?
>>340954971
so you will have no problem if i actually enjoy the game? thank you senpai, i knew i could trust your sensible judgement!
>>340955768
From a AAA developer that is trying to appeal to millions of people it is
Go petition Tripwire to make a realistic WW1 game if you want it that bad
>>340955281
People like you shouldn't be allowed to breed because of how stupid you are. DICE literally told us over a month ago that Battlefield 1 was set in WW1 with a "twist".
>>340955635
Plenty of people would.
Do all the same shit but get rid of the smgs and lmgs. Then buff bolt actions to one shot kill to chest, with semi autos being 3 shot kill to the chest.
Or just put fucking weapon limitations in. 3 smgs each side. 2 lmgs each side. 10 semi auto rifles each side. Unlimited bolt action rifles each side.
>>340955768
Games like CoD and Battlefield always keep their style of gameplay no matter the setting.
If you want realism in WW1 go play Verdun. If they made it slow paced and realistic, it wouldn't be Battlefield.
>>340955942
Oh I dont actually care, I already have Verdun
>>340955157
Sauce on that?? Did they crash into another plane? Holy shit dude
>>340950839
>newfag doesnt remember epic win
fuck you.
>>340955985
The twist is that it's WWI set in the 1940s, but nothing new was made, everything in existence was just improved by a lot?
>>340956113
It's fake don't worry
It was for some TV show
Game looksfungoing back with Bad Company levels of destruction. I'll hold onto my money until alpha/beta happens.
>the announcer seems out of place
>apples is for a
>submachine and semiautos everywhere
wtf man
>>340956081
is there a decent sized amount of players in that?
Well this was unexpected, i just now learned this even existed (initially assumed that E3 was still a couple days off somehow), just watched the trailer and multiplayer live gameplay commentary
Although the naming convention is a bit confusing, like is "BF1" just a working title or is this supposed to be a reboot of the 2011 frostbite-based reboot? Like wtf seriously
But honestly it's fucking amazing they really went ahead with this and pulled it off, can't fucking wait to fight for the Kaiser to save western civilization against the evil entente powers
>>340955991
People wouldn't though. I want a realistic WW1 game as much as you but what you're describing doesn't sell 10 million copies, it sells a million or two at the very most
Not going to lie, looking forward to it
Even if it's historically inaccurate it's so nice to see a shooter that isn't "MODERN WARFARE IN THE DESERT WITH A SCAR-H YET AGAIN"
If you view it as a death korps of krieg game instead of a WW1 game suddenly it gets better
>>340956146
The twist is everyone is running around with experimental weapons and gadgets.
>>340956265
Depends. Yank server usually has a few full games but I play on aus server which generally manages a full game in the evenings
>>340949149
>Drinking this piss sure is better than eating this shit, therefore drinking piss is comfy
You're a faggot, anon.
>>340956404
Cod 2 sold millions of copies, and everyone used bolt actions in that because they were so strong.
>>340955942
>tripwire
>realistic
>only 5 russians with a bolt every game
At least the Rising Storm team did slightly better.
>>340956191
Ah spank you anon. Wasn't really worried (twisted effing psychopath) but was definitely curious as to how that shit could even happen
>>340956472
Battlefield: Armageddon when? Total war managed to tap the warhammer crowd pretty well
>>340956565
I saw most people using the SMGs or AR's because the bolt-action rifles required a degree of skill.
>>340955985
it the twist that its shit?
>>340938775
There is literally 0 point in making a WW1 shooter when it's nothing even like WW1.
They could've completely avoided this by making a WW2 shooter.
>>340956680
Was just pulling your leg
It really did happen, the plane crashed but everyone survived
>>340956513
They were experimental for a reason.
They constantly fell apart, jammed, exploded, were horribly inaccurate (you were better off using a trench gun than an smg if you wanted even close quarters fights), and often times super weak.
This is suggesting an alternate reality where they had like 10-20 years+ to get all of the kinks out of those types of weapons... but then didn't go on to make better versions.
Looks like fast and fun Battlefield action. I like BF so I see no reason why I wouldn't like this.
>>340956615
DH is still the best iteration of any RO game/mod out there
>>340933893
T-they are using that weewee and it isn't wasn't present in this war. I want a real worrld war one game WEEEEEEEEE
>>340933893
BF1942 SW + BC2
Looks awesome. But Dunning Kruger Effect victims and other kids probably crying about realism.
>>340956680
http://www.nbcnews.com/video/nightly-news/53461411#53461411
>>340937698
Niggers I agree with.
But there were lots of poos from the ottomans.
Why cant people just take a game for what it is. Criticism is fine, i get that people dont like certain aspects, but getting angry over the color of skin of the guy you control? Who cares man. Its a ww1 themed battlefield game. Historical accuracy isnt what you're here for, quick scopes arent historically accurate either but someone during the reveal today was shittin on niggas with his rifle
Just play vidya man.
>>340956750
To be fair everyone forgets that WW2 was also mostly bolt actions and machineguns vs other bolt actions and machineguns
>just BF3, BF4, BFStarWars with gun skins
>somehow there are kids on /v/ STILL excited for it
>>340940002
HOW ARE YOU THIS FUCKING RETARDED
>no waifus or women
trash
>>340956129
You mean in BF3 how it would say "Epic Fail" if you killed yourself?
Is there going to be a singleplayer campaign? Lel
Also to all the braindead retards ITT perpetuating "le ebin rape of belgium xD" atrocity propaganda trope, please never reproduce
I bet you think german soldiers hacked off the hands of belgian kids too like the lying allied powers claimed (But later on admitted it was just all made up bullshit)
>>340956806
I kind of like it though, it's like if WW1 had more advanced tech, lets be honest, the cool shit happened near the end and all the awesome technology that led to WW2 technology was made near the end. Battlefield 1 feels like if they did an interwar period war game.
>>340956956
There were far more nigs than indians
>>340956926
>haha if I change someone to sound stupid then they'll sound stupid
Made by Swedish, right?
>>340940258
>>340952294
>>340957062
You dumb niggers fell for the bait hard.
>>340957282
YES
>>340957146
They confirmed a campaign, which as someone who enjoys the BF single player as well as being a huge history buff im really looking forward to it.
>>340952189
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mauser_1918_T-Gewehr
Lurk moar before spewing bullshit.
>>340957146
Belgium was legitimately fucked over, but it wasnt as moustache twirlingly evil as the entente like to portray
>>340957037
That was because of manufacturing costs though.
The dominance of rifles in WWII wasn't generally their superiority, but reliability.
The dominance of rifles (and mounted machine guns) in WWI was because of their superiority and reliability and cost all in one.
>>340947323
> HISTORICAL DOCUMENTARY
Yes. But why even bother making it a WWI game if your not going to even attempt to have some semblance of historical accuracy? WWII or even any post WWII conflict would have been a much more appropriate setting for a this game.
Instead we get Battlefield4/Battlefront game, with a WWI lite slapped on the surface.
>>340957162
I kind of like this idea. The setting should be an alternate history where the war dragged on 2 or or 3 more years and all the awesome shit the was starting to show up at the end became standard equipment
Looks like someone reskinned a battlefield game. Nothing about the gameplay screams world war.
>>340957439
Dear lord this is like RO2 putting in the mkb 42 but even worse.
>>340957459
This, the germans were just pissed off that this shitty belgian army was causing so much damage to them. They decided to take towns and ransack the place a bit to lure the belgians out of their defensive positions in forts
>>340957186
Britain used over a Million Indians to fight in the war.
I don't think as many Africans were used, but I can't find any figures for that.
>>340956714
>No game where you can hold the line with your fellow guardsmen against the green tide
>No game where you can crash your leman russ into a scrapped together Ork tank to stop the Ork's advance
>No game where you can drive your chimera full of battle brothers headlong into the Ork line on a suicide mission in his glorious name
>No game where you can man a heavy bolter turret and take out swathes of xenos scum
It should be illegal to not capitalise on these ideas
>>340952634
>I can't believe it's not russian!
This is like reverse tumblr. Everyone here is desperately looking for politically correct stuff to be angry about.
>>340957672
You can just pretend, not much will change if you just assume that, I mean it's a mostly multiplayer game with no story anyways and they've already said they want to make it fun and experiment with some of the later period technology so you can really just say it's an alt history ww1 that lasted a few years longer.
>>340957037
Semi Automatics were fairly common and you could easily get away with fully automatics.
But WW1? No.
It is completey stupid to highlight the fact that the game is set in WW1, when the contains little to nothing of what made WW1 special and different from the others.
It's like making a book about he holocaust, really nailing it in that the book is about the holocaust, but then only focus on black people.
It's like what the fuck? Why would you focus on the blacks when the primary target was jewish people?
>>340957493
True, but irrelevant. The point is the average ww2 infantryman carried a ww1 era bolt action rifle or a machine gun. There were lots of more advanced weapons floating around, espescially with the americans, but till. All i'm saying is bf1942 run n gun was only slightly less silly than bf1 run n gun
>all those pseudointellectual kids ITT who bitching about historical accuracy don't know anything about WW1 without wikipedia, google and memes
>all artists who work at BF1 knows more than /v/ kids because researching is part drawing
Looks like the same game I've seen a million times, except now you mash the fire button down instead of holding it down.
>>340957342
>post dumb uneducated bullshit on internet
>get called out for uneducated bullshit
>argue until you have nothing to say but admit your dumb bullshit
>IT'S JUST A JOKE LOL U GOT TROLED XDXD BAIT LOL HAHA
fucking kill yourself.
>not realizing an inaccurate frantic stylized ww1 is way better than a realistic version of ww1
I would love an accurate ww1 game but having this is cool as well, some of the technology they worked on was insane as they tried so many different things to try and break the status quo of trench warfare
>>340957870
There were somewhere around 2million african combatants from what I can piece together, but its hard to tell
>>340958216
>Semi Automatics were fairly common
Only with the americans did they ever come close to being standard armament. Bolt actions were generally preferred because of better reliability, lower manufacture cost and easier maintenance
>>340956472
>"MODERN WARFARE IN THE DESERT WITH A SCAR-H YET AGAIN"
No, instead is just plays like one of those games.
People are unironically assuming smg's and machine guns were widespread in WW2. Your ordinary soldat had bolt action rifles. smg's have about 200m range and mg's are heavy and cumbersome to operate. The widespread use of automatic weapons started with AK-47, after the WW2.
>>340958876
DELETE THIS
BF1 WILL FEEL REFRESHING SHUT UP
COD NEEDS TO DIE
>>340959230
MP40's were rather popular throughout the war
>>340958781
>I have nothing genuine to actually contribute or argue about, but i don't like what they say so I'll just insult them and act smug with a reaction picture
you summerfags are the worst.
>>340956790
>>340956939
Damn dude, that's amazing everyone lived especially the dude flying the thing
>>340959201
It plays just like doom. First person pew-pew.
>>340957838
>>340957459
Fun fact, the allieds also actually tried to claim that the emperor of austro-hungary personally oversaw the planned mass extermination of allied POW's and civilians in homicidal gas chambers (i'm not kidding, look it up they really did claim this) but later on they admitted this was completely bullshit aswell as in the case of belgium
Strange how you're not even allowed to question the WW2 version of this allied propaganda story in many countries or else you'll go to jail as a heretic
>>340957053
>bf star wars
>64 players
>world war 1
>helicopters and lock on warfare
>bf3/4
>naval ships
>>340959391
Nothing like as widely used as the k98 though
>>340933893
>Battlefield 1
>1
holy shit, why do they come up with such stupid titles? I know it's EA, but still
>>340959140
the russians would have had the svt 40 as their standard rifle, but they moved back to nagant when the war started
>>340938957
Why would you compare it to BF4 and not the most recent installment, Hardline (which is fucking dead)? Because your agenda requires it?
>>340959409
Reddit pls
>>340959391
Yes, objectively much more than any other smg or lmg used in WW1. Still, production numbers according to wikipedia is 840.000, whereas Kar98k has about 14 million.
>>340959587
The brits knew how to propaganda. They realize their soldiers will to fight would be much higher if they portrayed the germans as very evil. They spent many resources just making the germans out to be baby killing tier assholes.
The thing with WW2 is they did the same thing but then realize holy shit the germans actually did shoot shitloads of disableds, gays and religious/ethnic minorities.
>>340959951
Hardline wasn't made by Dice Sweden
>>340958969
Why have a frantic stylized game if it's going to be WW1 though. Regular modern warfare Battlefield games are fun but they should stay in modern warfare and not tread into WW1 if they don't want to go through the hoops of historical accuracy.
>>340959230
the soviets had entire battalions equipped entirely with smgs, and german infantry sections would have at least 1 machine gun in them, 2 if they could spare it
>>340959854
Not even close but it was still used enough that you can bend the truth a bit like every single ww2 game ever made even red orchestra. WW1 is a bit more of a stretch but i'm fine with a crazy version of it, lets me use all the cool toys that were really just prototypes or abandoned between the wars.
>>340960393
Its really not much more retarded than having frantic full auto gunplay in ww2. For me its just a waste of under represented setting
>>340959201
Literally this.
They could've been different and new, but instead they shit it up by focusing less on trench warfare, bolt actions and actual peroid correct shit.
Instead, we got battlefield hardline except it loosley looks like world war 1.
BOOORING. It's going to be another failure, immediately abandoned and left to die a month after release, and everyone is gonna go back to battlefield 4, just like what had happened with Hardline and Battlefront.
>buh buh le ripcod meme xD
fucking pathetic.
>>340960393
Because they already made 6 modern era battlefield games.
And the games never were meant to be historically accurate.
>>340960393
Because WW1 had many interesting prototypes near the end and tanks went from being rudimentary and shit to actually being viable by the end. These behemoth empires emptied their coffers just to research new technology and I find it interesting to learn about these and use them in a game.
>>340960106
are you literally retarded?
>>340961053
It doesn't need to be accurate, it just needs something, anything that doesn't make it feel like the same game we've been playing for 10 years now.
>>340961128
Are you?
>>340961268
Well they haven't showed us the new game modes yet so i'll withhold judgement for now but i've always enjoyed the core battlefield gameplay, this new setting is icing on the cake.
>>340960854
People abandoned Hardline and Battlefront for reasons that aren't purely the setting.
>>340961268
I'd rather play a game similar to what they've made before. Otherwise, why would you even call it a battlefield game?
>>340961268
Make bolt actions 1 shot kill to the head or torso and make them available to every class. Problem solved
Meanwhile in the BF1 Gameplay video comments section
>>340960609
Wow. Soviets sure liked their ppsh, they even mounted them on bombers.
>>340947618
Says the guy who wants to rewrite history to exclude any non-white race
>>340951730
this, something like forgotten hope with modern graphics would be baller
>>340956680
its actually real, everyone survived luckily enough
>>340958781
All the ww1 vets are dying
Luckily I have a copy of the world crisis by winston churchill on my mantle
>>340962049
>Arcade
>Arcadey
>>340962581
3 are actual machineguns, 1 is a sort mg/assault rifle/automatic rifle hybrid with severe jamming issues and 4 of them had about 10000 units in existence all together by the last day of the war
>>340951730
>Thinking EA would ever let the community make its own content
Winchester
Martini Henry
I need those rifles in BF1 for reasons.