GTX 1070
- Home
- Board: /v/ - Video Games
- Reading: GTX 1070
So the 1070 comes out on June 10th.
Are you getting it, /v/?
>>340510523
>Not even the 1070 in picture
Well, the thread is off to a great start. Great work, me.
Possibly.
>>340510523
>7.0
get ready for the wave of MEMES once again.
there's a NDA for the 1070 reviews, but fear not. You'll hear about this over and over again for an entire year.
>>340511153
What am I looking at here?
>>340511217
the 1070 can only use 6.8GB of it's memory 8gb memory
much like the 970 could only use 3.5gb of it's 4gb memory
>>340511305
A card fitting for my wife's son. I shall get it as soon as it comes out.
I'm getting the RX 480 instead.
It's just 200 dollars, and two of them together is faster than a 1080, and that's without optimisation.
>>340511420
get an 8gb version of the amd rx 480x instead lmao
200$ less
>>340511457
SLI is still shit.
>>340511610
1070 will throttle itself anyways because of the 6.8 meme
it's going to be another meme card
>>340511610
Not in this case. Each graphics card is only utilised at 51% capacity, and yet they still outperform the 1080.
Imagine the performance when they optimise for the games and the cards use 70% of capacity or something.
>>340511153
why you spreading misinformation AMD shill ?
>>340511678
A double-decker shit sandwich is still better than puke puree.
>>340511749
Optimization is nothing but a spook these days.
>>340511792
It looks legit. We'll know tomorrow. But this type of info plus the 1070 NDA is pretty telling.
>>340511485
That doesn't suit my lifestyle, though.
>>340510523
nah, my 970 is fine atm, I'll wait for the 1170 or something
Is this a midnight release for Australians?
I'll wait until actual, reputable humans have it and can reasonably compare it to AMD's new card, and judge my purchasing decision from there.
>>340511932
>It looks legit. We'll know tomorrow. But this type of info plus the 1070 NDA is pretty telling.
>windwos 10
>year 2559
>edited by VultureX
are you really this autistic ?
It has been debunked that those screens are fake as it can get and other sources report that 1070 uses full 8192 MB and no L2 cache issues
>>340512215
>I'll wait until actual, reputable humans have it and can reasonably compare it to [a card one tier below]
Why?
>>340512252
whatever man, i'm one of the youtubers they were dumb enough to send the 1070
ofc i'm going to use this to get more views lmao
a new era of memes, the 1070 being 6.8 is real
I already have a 1080.
Pic is of my old 970 too. The difference in size is crazy
1070 gtx is truly a GPUOTY. Easily good enough to play current games at maxed 1440p/60 fps. However I wanted to push for 4k and both 1070 and 1080 aren't enough for 4k/60 fps gaming. Not to mention I'd also have to upgrade CPU and MOBO so I feel like waiting till December/Black Friday sales.
will hold onto my 970 for a bit
>>340512252
Not autistic. Just not reading a fucking thing. Sorry famicom.
>>340510523
You shills still haven't told me who this is for? It cannot do 4k with even mediocre fps and 1440p has far cheaper alternatives. It literally has no use what so ever.
>>340512351
What the fuck are you talking about you fucking moron? Youtubers? How about professional tech review from Anandtech of the 1070.
Do you even know who made those screenshots ?
Literally fuck of from /v/ with this bullshit, you are so clueless shill its pathetic
>nvidiacucks
>>340512412
490 will be better and cheaper though
>>340512524
When newer games will come out, those cheaper alternatives will be too weak.
>>340512393
Are you doing anything to keep that beast from bending inside your case?
>>340512524
The best monitors are 1440p/144hz, so it's not even like it's the best solution for 1440, either. Shit's irrelevant.
if you only play at 1080p is it not worth it?
>>340510523
When it's down to 350 or less.
>>340512583
your analtech reviews wont matter
i'll pump and feed the 6.8 meme until it gets sour.
it's as real as it gets, just fyi.
cant wait to hear nvidias reason behind falsely marketing it as a 8gb card this time.
it almost resulted in class action lawsuit on the 970.
Their excuse last time was "miscomunication with the PR team"
>>340512651
Once it went in and I put a screw in, It seemed ok.
Bloody weighs so much though
>>340512616
non existend card tho
>>340512773
it will come out this year though, that's why 1070 can't be gpu of the year anon
>>340512616
and by then the 1080ti will be out too
>>340512773
There's nothing else this year worth upgrading for if you've already got 1080p60 handled. The smart people are gonna wait until the 490 and 1080ti are out and make a decision from there.
>>340512473
Same. I'm only going to upgrade my gpu once VR has become mainstream and there are plenty of options to choose from. From there, I'll pick the strongest card needed to run the strongest VR device. I'm going to guess that this will all happen in about3years.
>>340512680
Its not really even worth it on 1440p if you have cheaper alternatives that can do DX12.
>>340512832
1080Ti better be able to do 4k right and there better be decent 4k monitors around too or its dead in water.
So I'm finally going to replace my toaster soon /v/, as someone who knows nothing about building a pc, will the gtx1070 or rx480 give me more bang for my buck? Is it too early to tell yet? Any info is appreciated
>>340512745
>It seemed ok.
no way, I'd always be paranoid about a little bump on the desk or something.
i'm definitely getting a horizontal case next time
>>340513124
i dont care about amd or nvidia
i care about views
views = money
the 6.8 is real, and it'll make a great new meme from the amd shitposting crew
Fuck yes. Best price/perf card on the market at release. I'm sick of amd's shitty autodesk drivers so I can trash this 280x for a superior company and card with superior hardware support for software that matters.
>>340513280
well unless I gaffer taped it in there wasnt much else to do.
Its not shifted and I have checked on it once or twice so I wouldnt be too paranoid.
AMD won
>>340511457
You realize it's only faster with two cards in AOTS because that's using the multi gpu feature of dx12 right?
So many people believe this is crossfire performance but it isn't. Apparently, with dx12 you can mix any card. So if I were to mix my 1080 with my old 770, it would destroy 2x 480s again.
Either way, crossfire performance is going to be worse than this shit. This card also needs some proper benchmarks released first, it's not the first time AMD is hyping something up like this and it ends up being a massive failure, just like bulldozer or mantle.
>>340513340
You have no fucking about anything
kill yourself
>>340513562
>You have no fucking about anything
>>340513562
whatever, nvidia fanboy/paid shill
>>340513557
DirectX12 / Vulcan is the way forward anyway.
I'll just stick to the best value, which is the 480 is promising.
>>340513474
O G R E
G
R
E
>>340513694
dx12 is still a long way off. Kind of like arranging youre funeral on the day you are born
>>340512616
390x was also supposed to be better on paper than 970 gtx yet in reality it's 50/50 cuz of Nvidia dominating 82% of market. I'm realistic, I'm not gonna vote with my money just so maybe some day in the future AMD can take over the market and do same shady shit Nvidia does right now.
Threadly reminder that even amd owners don't like amd.
>>340513792
not so fast nvidia shill
>>340513764
No mate, everybody is supporting DX12 and Vulcan.
>>340511457
That could say "1x Radeon RX 480" and it still wouldn't be enough to justify buying an AMD GPU these days.
Radeon peaked in 2002 with the R300 series.
You have to let go now.
It's OK.
>Ever going AMD
>>340513629
>>340513693
Use tripfag so I can filter your existence from any board you underaged faggot
I can't decide if the looks of the reference 1070 are worth it or if I should just wait for an OEM version again. My card and motherboard are both Gigabyte, I'd figure swapping out for the same brand will be a little bit more reliable (or at least its just a placebo).
Wonder if Gigabyte's single 8-pin setup makes overclocking a dangerously tight affair?
>>340514002
Someone got their fee-fee's hurt :C
>>340513952
The Nvidia solution is actually costing you 900 dollars, because they also scam you into buying the gsync DRM chip for your monitor, which is an additional 200 dollars.
400 dollar AMD >>> 900 dollar Nvidia
will wait for the msi version
>>340513764
Vulkan and DX12 are getting patched into just about every major engine.
I held off on buying a 970 and for me the 480 is just gonna be that with more Vram and HEVC decoding.
>>340514068
I torn you apart in one reply. Maybe you start to save up for the 1070 little AMDegenerate ?
>>340514190
>I torn you apart
>>340511153
>being this desperate
Get out of your basement, neckbeard
>>340514215
You lost for words autist ?
>>340513952
What's it with /v/ and nvidia shills?
is a ps4 even half as powerful as this thing?
>>340514041
>the reference 1070 are worth it
Definitely not. There's absolutely no reason for not to wait for OEM versions.
>>340514365
Way less than that
>>340514130
>>340513902
DX12 being supported =/= being standard.
Majority of PC owners don't even have a GPU which can support DX12, not to mention the glorified W10 botnet. Do you honestly think they'll magically drop support for dx11? Even 1080 gtx is too shit to run games at 144fps/1440p so really those ultra end GPUs feel like overkill for 60/1080p but at the same time they're too weak for 144/1440p or 60/4k.
>>340514130
Are you stupid? You can't "patch" dx12 into a game and receive any dx12 benefits. Game engines have to be built from the ground up to fully support dx12 or you get the absolute worst shit fests like quantum break or gears ultimate which are all dx11 games with bolted on dx12 features.
Dx12 won't be the norm till 2018 at minimum and currently no gpu supports dx12 fully. By 2018 all gpus will be able to support everything dx12 has to offer with new gpu technologies like volta.
>>340514454
The consoles all have DX12-like APIs since a long time ago. It is the standard.
>"BUY AMD ITS CHEAPER AND FASTER"
>meanwhile nvidia runs everything smoother
>"FUCKING NVIDIA SABOTAGE"
damn son
AMD SUX
>>340514534
>consoles
>relevant to pc
>playing shitty console ports that run like garbage
>2016
How is that relevant to anything I've stated in my last post?
>>340512393
Which one's which? Don't tell me this fucking brick is 1080 gtx.
>>340510523
Why get the 1070 when the RX480 will be half the price?
>>340514778
Because they will be forced to.
Nvidia will soon release drivers that will gimp their 9x0 series, and lower their performance.
That's the Premium Nvidia Experience®.
>>340514529
Read you retard.
I didn't say games. I said engines.
Look at last gen and how many goddamn games ran UE4.
>>340514676
>>340514534
It matters when amd has their chips in all the consoles and most engine devs are gonna be cutting their teeth on similar hardware.
>>340513340
>i dont care about amd or nvidia
>i care about views
>keeps talking about how bad 1070 is
>some gibberish after getting cornered like a dog
Only AMD users
>>340512206
Seconding this, it's in thirty minutes and I'm not sure which sites to check.
>>340514534
No. Just no. Stop posting if you're going to speak about things you clearly don't know much about. Adored tv isn't a reliable source.
Console api's are way more efficient than dx12 can ever dream to be. There is a single console configuration for develops to work with compared to millions of different pc configurations. Even though dx12 is more efficient than dx11, it's no where near console levels of efficency.
>>340514778
I seriously think that you are ONE guy shitposting in every GeForce thread.
>>340514092
You are right. G-sync and free sync are scam tier.
I just bought one of those 1440p 144hz monitors. 1440p is useless and running the monitor at 144hz is negligibly smoother. So i am of the opinion all monitors are scams if it says anything other than 1080p 1ms input lag.
>>340514758
Which ones which? you cant tell the difference between a 970 & a 1080?
I
>>340512393
shit aint gonna fit in my case
>>340514878
You can't patch dx12 into an engine and receive any benefit. Stop watching adored tv.
>>340514778
Cuz knowing Nvidia they'll bribe every relevant Dev in existence to make sure a last gen Nvidia GPU gets better performance than newest and most expensive AMD card. Realistically speaking supporting AMD just isn't profitable, I'm not gonna sink my money just to support some principles.
>>340514968
Freesync is something every future monitor will adopt at no additional cost.
There are already 65 different kinds of Freesync monitors in the market now.
>>340514778
$379 1070 8gb
Vs
$250 480 8gb
Doesn't look like half the price to me.
>>340512616
Tell me, /v/, have you noticed how AMD shills always speak in future tense:
>but this GPU/CPU is gonna be more powerful than anything to date, y-you just wait and see
>my FX CPU is wek now, but just wait until games start to effectively utilise more cores, then you'll realize i'm right
>so what, AMD failed with X but everybody fails at some stage, just wait and see the revolutionary tech advance that will be Y, it will BTFO the competition
>i'm sticking to team red,we had some trouble, but were definitely getting there eventually
>b-but anon, it's directx12 compatible, you just be patient and see all that 500fps power I'm going to get once some games start running under dx12!
Thanks, but no thanks. I prefer buying something that actually works well now - not tommorow, not after a month or 10 fucking years, but
RIGHT FUCKING NOW.
Perhaps one day MAD poo in loos will stop dedicating every second in pursuit of their daydreams about "futureproofing" and start thinking about how NOT to run each of their mediocre products straight into the ground before it even hits the shelves.
>>340514778
>half the price
>same performance
You want some caviar with that snickers, sir ?
>>340515097
See>>340514873
The 970 and 980 will now be fucked, and gimped harder than any AMD card.
>>340515172
have you got to add tax onto that too? sorry im UK so I heard in America they show prices before tax
>>340514873
They actually do that? The fuck
>>340515097
>Cuz knowing Nvidia they'll bribe every relevant Dev in existence to make sure a last gen Nvidia GPU gets better performance than newest and most expensive AMD card
holy fucking shit, do you actually believe this? have you been living under a rock? look at how the 780TI aged when the 900 series cards came out, they fell behind in performance because nvidia didn't give a shit about them anymore, you're a second class citizen to nvidia unless you have their most recent card.
>>340514873
>Nvidia will soon release drivers that will gimp their 9x0 series, and lower their performance.
That's the Premium Nvidia Experience®.
[sources and citation by professionals needed]
>>340515237
Please, show me all of this proof of gimping.
>>340510523
if it gets a decently priced custom model then yes. fuck these ridiculous european prices. how is that even legal to pay 100 bux extra for taxes n shit.
>>340515264
The 1070 is £320 msrp in the uk. 480 pricing hasn't been revealed yet.
>not July the 10th
this triggers me
>>340515486
yep the 8gb is all guess on the price even though people claim it was confirmed $239
>>340515376
>>340515237
Never been proofed. Also let me get this straight. If I own a 970 gtx Nvidia will discontinue drivers' support after 3 years, if I get an AMD card, I'll never get any drivers to begin with
.
>>340515123
Well of course. Freesync is cheap to implement when compared to g-sync in a monitor. And you need as many buzzwords in the title of your monitor to trick people into buying your average monitor. Basically a scam.
>ITT: underage AMD shills repeat what they soaked up from reddit
every time
AMD will shit on Nvidia cucks soon
>>340515361
>>340515420
>>340515434
>>340515604
https://youtu.be/O7fA_JC_R5s?t=688
Watch that for 2 minutes, then watch what happens to NVidia performance.
They will release drivers to fuck your card and tempt you to upgrade, because you feel you need more performance.
>>340512393
Not as very first ones.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hercules_Graphics_Card
>>340515604
Kek, this.
I want to get a 1080 this summer, depending how I stand with cash. Could go for a 1070 but fuck it. I have a 670 right now and it's a very fine card, but I wanna play Witcher 3 with everything maxed. And a 1080 would give me a reason to upgrade my monitor later this year too. Now just have to figure out if I want to go for 4K or 144Hz.
>>340515625
>Well of course. Freesync is cheap to implement when compared to g-sync in a monitor
That's because Freesync is the industry wide VESA standard.
Whereas gsyn is just a DRM chip which will disable the adaptive refresh rate for GPUs Nvidia doesn't like.
>>340512393
>never owning a three fan card before.
Looks to be the same size as my 970.
>>340515765
Kek.
>>340515737
>professonals
>shilling e-celebs
BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>340515737
Yes and now watch and read sources from people who, you know, actually own the older nvidia cards compared to a neckbeard on youtube who thinks amd will run nvidia and intel out of the market by 2018.
https://youtu.be/DvCsT_dk-1E
http://www.bytemedev.com/the-gtx-780-ti-sli-end-of-life-driver-performance-analysis/
happy with my meme card familia
>>340515604
i have two builds, one with an nvidia cardd and one with a recent AMD card. they both perform fine when it comes to drivers. see i can say this with certainty because i've tested both, all you have is memes.
>>340516072
See >>340513792
>amd still don't have working autodesk drivers in the year 2016
Jfc
>>340510523
Yeah, feel like its time to upgrade. Also getting an i-7 6700k.
Might upgrade to the 1080 if the performance isn't good enough, I'll give the 1070 to my wife's son in that case.
>>340516146
i see you post that image in literally every GPU thread on /g/ and /v/, i know you have an nvida bias already.
>>340516072
Actually I owned both AMD and Nvidia cards for multiple rigs and multiple occasions. Haven't touched AMD with a stick since my 2 290x cards were reaching house fire temperatures till they started shutting down on their own.
>>340516205
>wife's son
What is this meme and where did it come from?
>>340516205
>i-7 6700k
Intel pisses me off. Literally 1 fucking pin difference between 1050 and 1051 means new MOBO.
>>340516358
Part of a meme's charm is that you don't know where it came from.
Let it be a mistery. Let it be an adventure. Don't ask, just breathe the memes in.
why does /v/ like getting cucked by Nvidia
>>340516251
>posting first hand accounts of someone's experience is shilling
Ok mate, ok.
>>340516307
You shouldn't have touched Nvidia since Fermi then.
>>340516205
6700k is a goos purchase if you do other things than game. I saw a near 50% incread from my 8350 8 core 4.0ghz nightmare.
>>340516552
For the same reason you like being poor. >>340516609
Nice meme. Personal experience shows that Nvidia cards run much cooler, my 980 has yet to reach 70 degrees and I haven't cleaned that shit in year.
Getting an rx 480 if the benchmarks are decent and then a 1080TI when it comes out
>>340516552
le cuck xDDD
>>340516205
Your 4790k would definitely be still fine to use, just OC it to 4.5ish
I am on a [email protected] and still think its fine for everything. My 290X though will not survive the next full year I think, trying to get more than 100FPS at 1080p so I can enjoy my 144hz monitor in more games.
>>340516676
Same here, even now during summer when it's 30c outside it hasn't reached more than 75c. Still feels hot in comparison to earlier when it never went over 60c.
>>340510523
Nah, I have a 390 now. going to wait as long as possible. I mostly play 4x stuff anwway, so I should be fine. Perfectly happy with it and a small OC.
>>340511610
I was under the impression that crossfire beats SLI.
>>340513557
>which nvidia cards support dx12
answer is NONE
>>340516676
>Nice meme.
But Fermi was actually hotter than fucking 290x and yet you touch Nvidia cards nowadays but refuse to touch AMD after 290x with probably a shitty fan god forbid stock.
They even address the TDP problems with their new line. Heat was solved just by pushing better coolers on their cards.
>>340517008
Nvidia cards actually support a feature level higher than amd, but whatever.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feature_levels_in_Direct3D
>>340510523
I just built a new computer and I'm waiting for the 1070. Not getting the founder edition or whatever they're calling it though. Waiting for the third party cards since they're cheaper.
I had AMD last pc and it was alright but I fucking hate the mouse cursor bug shit so I'm gonna try nvidia this time.
>>340517262
And get no visible gains from DX12 in any game yet.
>mfw rx480 drops it and will be worse than anything currently on the market
>mfw it wont be availalbe until august but launched in july
>mfw nvidia has entire 1000 series out faster
>mfw nvidia won all over
>mfw new Titan and 1080 Ti under the sleeve
How bad are Founder's Edition cards?
My shitty prebuilt has finally bit the dust and I need a new PC ASAP.
>>340517389
>How bad are Founder's Edition cards?
Mega jewed and shitty coolers apparently
>>340517389
Not worth spending the extra money on for a high end card with a housefire tier cooler. You can probably pick up a cheap 980ti, or the cards in the 970/390/390x range to tide you over for a few months.
>>340517568
I have the money right now, it's the cooling I'm concerned about.
Definitely going to wait for non-reference cards. I'm a good goy who buys a GTX X70 every year and sell the old one for $150-250.
>>340517338
Because nvidia cards aren't anywhere near as inefficient as amd cards, so they have little to gain compared to amd cards.
>>340517632
FE guys have been whining about blower coolers for a while I think, check some Reddit or Nvidia forums.
>>340517632
Never get a fucking reference card m8
>>340517389
There is LITERALLY no reason to buy the FE edition. It's inferior in every conceivable way and it costs more because dumb retards are willing to pay $70-100 more to get the card on launch. Don't be a dumb goy and wait a week or two for reference cards.
>>340510523
No, I'm going for the 1080.
Shoul I go EVGA FTW, ASUS Strix or GB Extreme?
>>340517680
So what does DX12 exactly do to Nvidia cards besides nothing?
You can blame it on AMD or anything else but even if DX12 is just removing their inefficiencies they are still gaining a lot and beating Nvidia at it per price bracket.
>>340517879
Doesn't really matter. EVGA I guess, they have good costumer support.
>>340517961
They are also the cheapest here currently, by a pretty decent margin (~60+ €).
>>340512252
that pic is supposed to prove it uses 8GB?
LOL
that's just what it says on the card
in the actual testing it only uses 6.8GB which you can see here >>340511153
Right now I've got two PC's running new skylake processors with reused 750Ti cards. Should I try to sell these cards when I upgrade? Will there even be a market for these things?
>>340518214
>in actual testing
[sources and citations] needed
So what do you guys plan to play with your $700 cards?
Undertale, Indieshit, console ports that will be poorly optimized, and Overwatch?
How much is a 1070? I have a 970, don't know if I should upgrade since it still does its job.
>>340513764
>youre
go back to 1st grade you fucking piece of shit
>>340517942
You do know that dx12 consists of more than just asynchronous compute, right? Async was even in dx11_3 so it's not even exclusively a dx12 feature.
Because there are no true neutral dx12 games (nvidia have their dx12 games they win in and amd have their own too), no one can predict what features other than async will benefit either company.
Also, dx11 is still the standard for a good few years yet and I'm not going to support Microsoft with its crazy windows store games just for dx12 if I get an amd card. Nvidia are the logical choice for dx11 currently and even if amd and nvidia go head to head at stock speeds, any overclock to the nvidia card puts it out of reach of the competing amd card and this can't be denied. Nvidia is cheaper here too, so buying nvidia for cheaper and overclocking it is a win-win situation.
Yes, I'm dead set on getting one. I also just ordered an Asus PG278Q display (1440p, 144hz, g sync) for $480 refurbished. I'm so fucking hyped.
>>340518608
visual novels in 4k.
>>340518753
>ny overclock to the nvidia card puts it out of reach of the competing amd card and this can't be denied
Most reviews are already done on boost clocks with various overclocks and I am not seeing it. In fact the current trend regardless of DX12 or DX11 start putting 390 closer to 980 than 970 for example.
>>340518608
I'm going to play ancient paradox games and civ 4.
>>340518654
Do you plan to heavily invest in 4k or VR?
If no, don't bother with this generation of GPU at all.
>>340518608
I need it for my vive.
>>340518608
they question is what you won't be playing on your 199$ AMD card
fucking idiot
>>340514778
Why buy an RX 480 when an APU costs a fraction of what a shitty CPU + RX 480 cost?
>>340519334
>AMD
Not even once pahjeet.
When i upgrade to a better computer and the prices have dropped a little, then i'll do it.
I just hope my i5 4670K + meme-70 will last me a while tho. Component prices are just up the fucking roof here in Finland. And i play games really damn late desu, rarely do i shell out +60€ on release day to a game that might barely fucking work.
>>340515737
>Adored TV
EVERYTIME
>>340511153
>implying 7GB isn't enough
Who am i kidding, it'll become the new meme card
>>340514190
>I torn you apart
lmao dude, are you actually diagnosed with severe autism?
>>340510523
No. I will wait for the Vega with 16GB of VRAM.
>HBM2
>Asynchronous Compute
>Probably cheaper than the 1080
Literally no excuse.
How noticeable are gains from better memory? Talking about like 16gb 1333 to 16gz 2400
>>340520152
For video games?
No.
will this play nuDoom in 1080p 60fps ultra? or will a 970 cover that when it inevitably drops in price
>>340520152
Absolutely nothing unless you like to run virtual machines all day
>>340520152
next to none
>>340518716
1st grade? are you 14 or something
Are mummy and daddy going to buy you a new gpu?
>>340519004
>1% difference
They look pretty neck and neck to me
I'll just get the new AMD card that's coming out
>Cheaper
>I play at 1080@60
>Very good power usage, won't need to upgrade PSU
>tfw my 1yr old 970 can push 1440p 60fps
How long till it fries and I need to get the 1070
I actually got a near new 970 for $100 less a few weeks ago thanks to all these new cards being announced. Am I retarded /g/? I had a five year old AMD before...
>>340520272
Doesn't Doom have some optimization where it changes resolution and textures and shit in real time to keep a steady FPS.
>>340520696
That's an option. But it's not turned on by default.
>>340520437
I said current trend. If it's DX12 it's pretty highly probable that 290x or 390 are within 1% of 980. There was also that Black Ops benchmark with similar results of 980 being either at the level or below 290x.
It's just gonna end up like with 7xx series. The worst part is that the new games are exactly where better performance starts mattering more unless you are already using 1440p or better.
>>340520623
> Am I retarded /g/?
pretty sure you are
>>340520548
you can upgrade when you want to start playing new releases at better settings than medium-high.
Where did all of these anally ravaged AMD drones come from all of a sudden?
530-600€ in Europe. That's entirely different price segment than the 970 was. People who can spend that much will get the 1080, and the ones who can't will simply not buy it. The latter are probably much more common.
>tfw 1080 is $900 in canadaland
>>340520762
>within 1% of 980
>highly probable
Ok just stop posting. You clearly don't know what you're talking about.
>mattering
Go back to English class.
so how bad is using the onboard graphics from an i5 6600k? wanna see if I can hold out till the rx 480 comes out.
>>340521485
its over 1k in aus land
>>340521242
>That's entirely different price segment than the 970 was.
It's rumored that there will be a 1060ti, so maybe the 1060ti will be in the tier the 970 was, and the regular 1060 will be in the same tier as the 960.
>>340521242
FE edition here costs more than my current entire new rig of 390 and i5 4690k
>>340521528
I'm actually doing that (but waiting for a 1070 and I have an i5 6500). You can play most games at last gen console settings, but at 1080p with better framrates.
>1920x1080 @ 60hz monitor
Why would I get a 1070 when the new AMD cards will (probably) deliver 60 fps at half the price?
>>340521528
>Integrated GPU
Unless you're playing games that are over 10 years old don't even bother.
>>340520535
>>Cheaper
get a fucking job you poorfag
no doubt you're also a retarded pirate
>>340521748
Why make the comparison when the 1070 and 480 aren't competing with each other? If a 1050 comes out, that is what will be competing with the 480.
>>340521768
>that are over 10 years old don't even bother.
>Tfw getting 10fps in Sacred Underworld on my integrated intel HD 4600
>it was released 12 years ago
>>340521748
>new amd card delivering 60fps
On the shitty settings yes
>>340521950
source?
>>340522005
His ass, what else?
>>340522005
Theyre said to be between the 390 & 390x standard.
There is no source as the only thing AMD dared show was 2 cards attmepting to run that Ashes game nobody plays or gives a fuck about
>>340521865
He's making the comparison because he has to choose between either of those for the monitor he has.
>>340515172
8GB 480 is $229 confirmed by AMD
>>340521748
>1080p/60
It performed 34 frames in Ashes in DX12 single performance
so your dream about 1080p / 60 steady on ultra / high settings never going to happen in any halfway decent game
you pay for console status and thats what you will get
>>340510523
No.
I'm getting the 1080 Ti
>>340521486
>Ok just stop posting. You clearly don't know what you're talking about.
Nah fuck you.
>Go back to English class.
Literally correct.
>>340522179
No official confirmation. Its people guessing thatll be the price.
QUOTE " The $199 price tag is said to be for the 4GB model. 8GB model is expected to be $229. Link
http://www.wsj.com/articles/amd-prices-3-d-cards-to-spur-virtual-reality-market-1464725394 "
>>340522179
"expected to be" nothing has been officially confirmed by AMD on the 8gb price.
Hell they could charge $269 for them
>>340521587
Maybe, but it will also have lower performance.
I cant see there being a 1060ti. No point really with the 1070 being cheap
>>340522193
>on ultra / high settings never going to happen in any halfway decent game
Just turn off shadows and voila 60 fps
>>340520152
Depends on the game. Fallout 4 and The Witcher 3 see some significant gains, other games barely any.
>>340524454
It doesnt quite work that way.
I love when people say their gpu can do 60fps on ultra.
Then they say yeah I just turn down this and this.
>>340524374
>No point really with the 1070 being cheap
But the 1070 is more expensive than the 970 at launch. Either Nvidia's lowest end card is going to go up in price, or they need to add another tier below the 1070 so that they're competing in all price brackets.
>>340524641
I never said that, and shadows don't matter anyway, I'd rather have them off or on very low, only exception would be if it's really fucking retarded like in that puzzle game from the makers of that shooter game
>>340524808
Sorry they will do a 1060 not a 1060ti. Thats what I meant
>>340524808
According to purchase logs and other manufacturing spreadsheets there's going to be a 1060 and 1060 ti. It's all speculation though.
>>340510523
I'm getting a non-reference gtx1080. Is there any reason to settle for less?
>>340525084
My monitor is only 800x600 so I don't have any reason to get 1080, probably ever
here in ausfailia, a 1080 is 1200, a 1070 is 800.
A 1070 in the us is 379.
So the answer is neither.
>>340524817
>shadows don't matter anyway
Righto then.
>>340525424
>tfw born in consumerist heaven, America
>>340524808
1060 will probably cost $220-250.
>>340525424
Yeah thing is though The average wage is way higher in Aus. I know you have import tax etc but it gets evened out so you cant pull that card.
>>340525526
Do you stare at the ground constantly in game?
>>340525684
......shadows are cast by everything and on everything.
How long has it been since you left the house?
>>340525684
Shadows are not just on the ground you know.
Ah you wouldnt as you havent got them turned on!
>>340525819
I stare at the ground in real life already I don't need to be doing that in video games also
Video games are to escape not the make it all worse
I'm interested but I'm going to wait for benchmarks of the 1070, 1080 and 480 like a sensible person.
>>340521748
Because you won't get 60 FPS, at least on new games.
You get what you pay for.
>>340525996
gtfo amd shill
>>340526070
I don't understand.
>>340524817
>shadows dont matter anyway
>ultra settings dont matter anyway
>graphics dont matter anyway
AMD drones ladies and gents
>>340526165
>>ultra settings dont matter anyway
>>graphics dont matter anyway
I only said shadows don't matter, they don't, texture quality does, model quality does, lighting does, reflections do, not shadows
>>340526226
>lighting matters
>shadows dont
Reminder that most benchmarks turn on stupid shit like 8xMSAA, which is redundant at 1440p and higher.
Anyways, I'm planning on grabbing a 1070 (evga likely, but I'll wait for reviews) to upgrade from my 960 and a new 1440p monitor to upgrade from my 1080p. I reckon I'll get a 144/120hz display to enjoy older games like TF2 and shit I replay yearly like FEAR at insane framerates, while I expect I'll be playing current titles at 1440/60
>>340510523
Already preordered the EVGA 1080 FTW card. Gotta have that 10+2 phase.
>>340526347
>Black and white = Full color spectrum
>We don't need more than 1 shade of each primary color
>Sun and lighting shouldn't affect the colors of things
Meanwhile shadows just make things darker, you don't even notice it, they are two completely different things and one is a lot more important than the other
>>340510523
Will only upgrade to a 1070 once I'm able to find an aftermarket one for 400€ tops
which means I'll propably have to wait some months
Thank god my 770 still manages to perform reasonably well in most games but I can't wait for my first witcher3 playthrough
>tfw buying an EVGA founders edition because I have zero patience
>>340526624
Don't do this
What's the difference between the 1070 and the 1080?
>>340526654
I built a new PC last month and I currently have no GPU, I can't deal with integrated graphics for much longer
>>340526695
About 20% performance. The 1070 has a better price/performance ratio.
>>340526724
I'm literally in the same boat. I'll wait until the NDA lifts on OEM cards to make my final decision though. The STRIX 1070 is fucking sexy.
Is it worth it picking up a 1070 even if I have an i5 3570k?
>>340526695
1080 is better but costs more
>>340526695
Enough that made me buy a 1080 rather than a 1070.
I got it on release and its been amazing so far.
>>340526695
Nothing, they're both shitty memecards. Get an RX480.
>>340526724
I would suggest throwing $75 at a used 750ti to hold you over for awhile. Then flip it for minimal to no loss in a few months.
>>340526985
that's a pretty difficult question without knowing what either are
>>340527017
He could also use it as a second GPU in dx12 games.
>>340526985
Why don't you post a speccy?
Should I upgrade my CPU or GPU
Nah, the 1070 is for poorfags. I didn't wait this long for Pascal just to get a cheaper 980ti.
Now, if we get some more benchmarks and it turns out the 1070 is like 5 fps behind the 1080 in games at my chosen resolution, that's a different story.
>>340526972
>both shitty meme cards
>im a poorfaggot so im buying a rehashed 390
>>340527116
>>340527073
Yeah sorry i could have sworn I chose a picture
4chan x is really fucking up lately
I only play at 1440p60fps, so the 1070 is pretty much the ideal choice
Is a 1070 overkill for 1080@60Hz?How about a 1080?
>>340527131
CPU first if you really wanted to
What do I think about the 1070?
>>340527291
1080 is definitely overkill, the 1070 is a great choice though
people say these new cards are for 1440p and above, but a 1070 will futureproof you for a long while on 1080p
Is there a way to actually buy a GPU without feeling like
>"FUCK I should have waited"
been wanting to upgrade from my 6970 for a while now
>>340527354
His cpu is fine . It wont bottleneck and is pretty good for another few years , jesus I forgot this i /v/
>>340527516
no
this will never happen
tech is constantly evolving
>>340526540
>they are two completely different things
No they're not lol
>>340527131
>upgrading any intel bridge
for what purpose?
>>340515195
>RIGHT FUCKING NOW
Yeah but it costs like 2x what it should desu senpai
>>340526540
AMD drones are *this* retarded
>>340527516
No, there's always something new coming around the corner but the best way to put that feeling off is by picking up the newest cards when they come out.
However it really doesn't matter if a new card comes out and is better than yours at the same price or whatever, as long as what you have works for you then it's not a big deal. And even if you buy a powerful and expensive card that's beaten by something within a year, that doesn't suddenly make your powerful card worthless because it'll keep up in games for at least a few more years to come. The real victory is using a single card for 5+ years, that way when you finally upgrade it's a huge difference rather than some incremental bullshit.
>>340527516
of course not
just buy something and regret it instantly. It's the only way.
Reminder that DX12 is another doomed API like DX10 that's being pushed to an even earlier grave thanks to major adoption of Vulkan.
>>340527703
>>340527803
The fuck are you talking about, lighting isn't related to shadows at all, lighting actually makes sense not like shadows that just appear out of nowhere for no reason just because the developers wanted them there for some reason
>>340527516
A) Don't buy when big new architectures are on the horizon
B) Remind yourself how long your 6970 has lasted you and that your next card even if it's not the top of the line, will last similarly
C) Chill out about the whole thing
>>340527891
AMD drones are *this* retarded
>>340527891
Dynamic/realtime shadows exist my man.
>>340527826
I have been waiting for the new line of graphics cards to come out so that the 900 series would go down in price a little.
I'm fine with buying a 970, memecard and all, since it would suit what i need right now..... but I can't shake the feeling that I should just get the 1070 and be safe
>>340512393
I'm so glad I have a full tower
I learned my lesson from trying to squeeze a gtx 285 in a mid tower
the only problem is that these things tend to get in the way of sata cables depending on how your motherboard orients them
Do I
>buy another 970 to crossfire
or
>buy a 1070
>>340528150
1070
no. the 1070 is as 1440p or 144hz card and my monitor is 1080p 60fps.
>>340528063
>Dynamic/realtime shadows
What? Shadows are just dark spots developers put in places because they want it to be darker and more annoying, just want to turn it off
>>340528150
>crossfire
what do you think
>>340528129
I had a nightmare with cabling and this. I have been lazy and havent reworked them as yet so yes I had that problem!
>>340528197
Any reason? From my limited research the crossfire would give me better performance.
>>340528229
never done it before
>>340528150
crossfire? you mean SLI is this bait?
>>340528150
>xfire a 3.5gb card
:^)
>>340528382
:^)
>>340528303
Alot or games don't have proper SLI/Crossfire support, even in CURRENT YEAR
You are strictly better off getting a strong single card
>>340528303
crossfire is way more of a hassle than it should be
if you get another card, you're going to have loads of fun trying to troubleshoot
>>340510523
2 980ti's in SLI, 5960x cpu
play 4k games in 60fps its great, I really dont care too much for higher framerate after experiencing WoW, GTA 5 and other AAA games at ultra settings.
No because Nvidia has once again lied about the vram, pascal cards are housefires, pascal runs like ass on DX12 and its overpriced
Have a 270x so definitely due for an upgrade. If I'm fine with 1080p/60fps for thr near future should a 480 do the trick, or is there good reason to get a 1070?
Based on what we know so far anyway
>>340527131
I have the same CPU but I'm not upgrading. I'd like to but then I'd need a new motherboard too so fuck that.
When will 120/144fps porn start being produced?
>>340516205
you're playing at 1080p 60fps
why is it time to upgrade? there's no game on the market a gtx 980 can't run at 1080p 60fps. you're going to be buying a new 500 dollar cuck card without getting anything for it.
>>340511610
>he doesn't know
DX12 removes a lot of the SLI and Crossfire pains. It's viable now
>>340527858
I don't think so because of two reasons.
1).From what I've heard, Vista (the only OS it worked on) was at least initially a buggy, bloated POS that actually ran software slower than its predecessor, needed gaming PC tier hardware to run its Aero interface and barley had any drivers working on it when it first came out.
2).The seventh gen consoles came out right before DX10 compatible hardware a thing (thus they only supported DX9 or OpenGL).
Thus developers didn't feel like spending lots of money to make the game look better for a very small minority of PC gamers. DX12, on the other hand, is compatible with the pretty popular Windows 10 and is partially supported by the GPU's of the PS4 and Xbox One.
>>340527291
Both are overkill. They're 1440p cards.
>>340529037
>with the pretty popular Windows 10
Hehehehehe
>>340529159
What about future-proofing.
>>340529196
>implying Windows 10 isn't popular
>>340514454
That just means win7/8 users won't be able to play it, just like xp cucks couldn't play dx11 games. Same shit, different day.
>>340529159
480 then?
>>340529196
I'm talking about the general public, not 4chan and similar sites.
>>340529358
Something that doesn't exist.
>>340529414
The 480 seems to be a bit more powerful than a GTX 970 or R9 390, which puts it as the perfect 1080p 60fps card for $200 dollars and very low power consumption.
I'm just going to get a 980ti
>>340526350
When are the EVGA 1070s coming out? I've been buying EVGA for a while now and I haven't had much trouble so I figure I might as well stick with them.
>>340529594
>>340529414
Why are there so many AMD shills on this board
Just get a fucking 1070 you poor cunts
>6.8
>No, it's &.5
>No, it only uses 6.8
>Some guy post a picture
Tell me AMDfags, why isn't no one reporting this?
Is it worth making the jump from the 770?
>>340529717
Because I don't want to waste and extra $100+ if a 1070 is overkill for my purposes.
Do you like to throw away money?
>>340529717
Because the 1070 is shit. Nvidia fucked up with this new line.
>>340529838
>>340529870
Are you homeless or something?
Get a job
>>340529358
future proofing doesn't work because technology and standards change over time. "power" is not a linear thing.
take, for example, the gtx 780ti. 3 years back, it was a $600 dollar beast of a card that was viewed by consumerist cuckolds as the greatest future proofed card that anyone would need. that was when it was released. 3 years later and it's an lolbad card that gets outperformed by every metric because hardware that games require has changed and it's no longer suited for the job.
you buy a card to use it for the purpose its built for. "future proofing" will only lead to you having a hurt butt. it always does.
>>340529717
you're really dumb.
>>340528869
did anyone tested AMD/nvidia mix in DX12?
What's the deal with the founders edition anyway? Isn't it more expensive and performs worse than the custom cards that will inevitably roll out?
Aren't you literally paying more for less
>>340511153
>MisterX
Known AMD/ Xbone shill. Please fuck off.
>>340529594
The RX 480 is very promising, especially the low cost of $200. However, I might get the GTX 1070, depending on the upcoming benchmarks for the RX 480.
I'll probably also get the RX 480 if this 6.8GB talk actually turns to be real, which I heavily doubt considering the impact of the GTX 970 3.5GB meme.
>>340529893
Spoken like a trust fund kiddie. I have a job. Which is why I value the money I make and don't want to waste it.
Not gonna throw away $100 just because I can
>>340529501
>>340529915
I'll be building a new computer in the upcoming months, but I don't really want to change my 1080 screens, or getting a new one because real estate issues so to speak.
I don't know what to do really, it's been a long long time since I built any computer, how about a 980ti if the price drop is significant? if it's not might as well carry along with a 1070, right?
>>340530120
Yes the Founder's Edition is just a reference card, it exists to rip-off impatient people. If you're not retarded just wait for the versions made by other companies.
>>340529717
if you play at 1080p 60fps then a 1070 isn't suited for the job.
it's a card for VR and 1440p.
also
>mfw there are weirdos on /v/ who spend $400 dollars on graphics cards just to play console parts that were made to run on $200 console hardware
>>340517262
>implying those matter
DX12 is all about async. 1070+1080 still doesn't have actual async hardware because it was planned before dx12 got going. You would have to wait for 1170/1180 for that.
>>340529893
I have a job but I have no desire to buy a bad product.
>>340530015
It's wonky as fuck.
Interested in 480 but there are too many times AMD has hyped up something as the second coming of Christ and it turned out to be garbage. Just going to wait for 3rd party benchmarks for everything, maybe wait for the 1060 to see an apples to apples comparison.
>>340530216
What impact? That shit happened and everyone fucking said "well I'll never use more than 4gb anyway!"
>>340530307
1070 will always be overkill for games at that resolution and framerate. 1080p 60fps isn't really a hard setting to run at. Just take a look at benchmarks of games you want to play and see how cards are performing.
>>340530387
Yeah I was hyped as fuck that the 1070 came out tomorrow, but then I saw a €500 pricetag and "Founders Edition".
Just gonna wait, maybe get the 480 instead. Just wanna play 1080/60 anyway and like >>340529915 and >>340529501 said, future proofing is bullshit.
>>340530681
Eh, I don't really browse 4chan that much, all I remember when the 3.5GB meme was recent was a lot of shitposts on /v/ and /g/. Plus a friend who spent literally a whole week dissing the GTX 970, although he was an AMD fanboy at the time.
>>340520623
>settling for 3.5gb
>games are starting to use over 6gb
Sure looks like it.
>>340517262
Nvidia can't into async so their feature level doesn't even matter. AMD bet on async years ago with GCN and have been refining it ever since.
Best way to describe it would be like Nvidias cards being very good at doing one task and AMDs cards being very good at multitasking
In DX11 Nvidias cards are extremely powerful but in DX12 the AMD cards can finally use GCN to its full potential and can work faster than the Nvidia cards because they can process more things at once
>>340510523
It's not really anymore powerful than a titan x and games are going to start stessing that at some point.
I'll hedge my bets on a 1080
>>340530798
>1080p 60fps
I can't even get 30fps at 1024x768 in GTA IV
I'm thinking of getting a 1070 though, you say future proof is a meme but at my resolution, I think it will last until it dies
>>340529915
Future-proofing doesn't work if one wants to run games at the same settings in the future as they can in the past but it can work if one is willing to sacrifice on resolution or graphics settings and is willing to overclock.
Look at the R9 290. Once custom models for the card finally came out, it was seen as the king of the high end price-performance curve and it could play essentially almost every game at 1440p with maxed or near maxed out settings. Fast forward to today and it still is a respectable card as long as one is either willing to go down to 1080p resolutions or is willing to sacrifice graphics settings at 1440p.
>>340511457
I don't trust poo-in-loos to give me credible facts
>>340531654
even if you buy a 1070 when it comes out you can always upgrade your monitor
I'd rather get a 1070 first and then upgrade my monitor than do it the other way around
>>340525424
Gotta pay those taxes to keep the abos in the lap of luxury, cuck
>>340532295
>that webm
what the fuck did i just watch
>>340532295
get out
>>340532295
Do I want to know what is happenig here?I do
What's up with all the underage fanboy shills?
Do you seriously want a monopoly for either side?
>>340519520
>Component prices are just up the fucking roof here in Finland
Desu that's why you buy them via geizhals.
>>340533185
No, but AMD has demonstrated time and time again that they are inept. Just look at their CPUs.
>>340532606
>>340532619
>>340532683
what was it?
>>340533482
And NVIDIA hasn't?
With drivers that fry cards and cards with fewer VRAM that they advertised? Plus gimping old cards with drivers
Get a grip
Why in the fuck wouldn't I buy into this sweet deal? 1080 overpriced and can't even 4K as a single card, you'd have to be extremely dumb to buy one. And no one wants SLI/Crossfire garbage.
>>340533769
>With drivers that fry cards
That's a myth you moron it has never been proven it's just a troll started by some idiot AMD shills
>still have usage issues with my gtx 970
>even after doing an rma and replacing it entirely and every fix I could find on the internet
>got the gtx 970 in january gtx 1070 is already out and was only a little more
should I just kill myself at this point
I will never run any game I want to play without the usage dropping and tanking the framerate
>>340534170
How was it proved it was a troll?
>>340534439
What's stopping you from buying a 1070 if you can afford a 970 at full price?
Hurry up and sell that piece of shit and stop making excuses.
>>340534734
Its going to be $100 more because there's no way I can sell a opened 970 for $300
I think I might do it anyway, I only play on 1080p so it might be way overkill though.
and if I have the same issue with the 1070 I'm megafucked
I already preordered a Gigabyte 1080. How big of a mistake did I make?
>>340535186
What are you going to use it for? To play console ports at 1080p?
>>340535086
Then sell it for $200 and by yourself a $200 1070. How fucking hard is that to grasp? Next you'll tell me that $200 is too expensive when you just said you bought yourself a $300 card. Not to mention that was 6 months ago.
If you're a poorfag, then just say it. Otherwise stop being a fucking crybaby.
>>340535518
Mostly to play Total Warhammer right now and BF1 when it's out I imagine. Been thinking about investing in a 4k monitor but can't buy everything at once.
>>340534168
>can't even 4K as a single card
you clearly havn't seen DOOM running (smoothly) at ultra settings on 4k have you?
>>340535973
Source please. I'd love to see that deliciousness.
>>340536078
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=22ePLtROm6I
>reference card
Nah fampai.
>>340536215
I was about to link that.
The GTX1080 is a beast and this proves it
>>340536345
Shame the video is not in 4k, but it's nice to have some hard proof of what it can do without a recording software eating any performance.
>>340513557
i like how people give amd shit for moving HD6000 series to legacy
https://www.nvidia.com/page/legacy.html
when nvidia even puts fucking kepler at legacy level
meanwhile southern islands still supported
>>340536215
COOL! It can run 1 game at 4K 60FPS.
But anon according to these guys it's not future proof for 4K
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2-61Zn4Sb8Q
>>340536535
>listening to linus tech tips
>ever
>>340536497
>600 series is legacy now
damn...
>>340536751
A real man doesn't wear a shitty earring
>>340530015
here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Rl-nZ9tolA
>>340536629
You do know that this guy >>340536215 is affiliated with LTT right?
>>340528303
If you have the option, do not go with more than 1 GPU. I can't tell you how many headaches and hours I have spent fucking with mine over the last few years. Never again.
>scan charging £649 for FTW 1080
>Overclockers charging £609
why is scan so shit these last couple of years?
>>340537479
multi gpu setups sound like such a headache I don't know why people recommend it so often
>more power required than single gpu setups
>more space required
>produces more heat and more noise
>compatibility with games varies wildly
>microstuttering
after I heard all the downsides I decided to never bother with multi gpu setups
>>340514993
You can't respond to someone without being a cunt?
>>340537814
Honestly I wouldn't mind the power/space/heat/cost/etc. if it would just give me better performance in games. When 9 out of every 10 new games either won't work at all or have massive issues running 2 cards (flickering, texture fuckups, huge fps drops) it's just not even worth bothering when you have to wait weeks to months sometimes for drivers to fix them.
>>340513952
uhh what's wrong with amd?
>>340521485
I know, I hate statists distorting the market.
>>340514993
bro you legit have autism. I bet you can't make friends because you think responding to honest questions like that is ever acceptable.
>>340537814
>>340538078
That's why Dx12 exists, fuck off.
>>340538907
>every game has dx12
>
>>340510523
DO NOT BUY REFERENCE CARDS
>>340530470
>DX12 is all about async.
No.
>>340540752
Why? The reference design cools perfectly fine even OC'd if you set the fan to 100%.
>750ti meme cardProbably should actually upgrade sometime
>>340542065
>gtx560
Can't upgrade because poor.
Maybe, don't feel like paying more than 400 for it though so it'll probably be july or august before I start looking
Really wish AMD had taken the finger out and released vega around now instead of next yearno they aren't going to have it out this year, thats fanboy drivel
>>340536535
Ashes is the only game that matters amirite Pajeet?
I would if I actually played games on my PC
>>340510523
I need to get a new motherboard and CPU first. I didn't know how important mobos were for gaming when I built my PC. Mistakes were made. After I get a new CPU and mobo, I'll probably save up to get an EVGA ACX2 1070. Nothing wrong with my 280, but the 1070 is on that next level shit
>>340543628
So this....is the power of AMD.....whoaa
So what's a good GPU to get for about $200
>tfw possibly going to retire my 770 this summer
you've been a workhorse for a long time for me, but now that moss is starting to grow on the north side and new vidya is making you sweat bullets, it's time for you to be put in an elderly home for grafix
>>340544904
The 480
>>340510523
I can't even properly calibrate the settings for my current one so what's the point.
>>340529753
probably. upgrading from a 970 here
