They fucked up the release of this so hard they pulled it off the steam store and then steam had to introduce a new review system showing recent reviews next to overall reviews.
This game now has "overwhelmingly positive" recent reviews, does this mean it's now playable? This is from someone who had it crash over and over on release until I refunded it
it was always 'playable', but autists can't get off unless it's a stable 60fps 2160p on ultra.
>they cancelled the Linux version
ITS NOT FAIR
Still not played Arkham Knight. I've played Arkham Asylum / City and was pretty satisfied with it.
- As far I know quality wise is not that great
- The major issue was performance. Is the performance fixed for now to be playable?
- Worth the discount price if ever appear?
>>340157708
Jesus fuck, that's one terrible webm. Looks like a fucking gif.
>>340157224
It still have no boss fight, too many batmobile sections, dumb looking suit and shit villain.
>>340157785
>Riding-Vroom-VroomFunny-Girls-are-Sexy-GIrls
>>340157415
>it was always playable
I'm not graphics whoreson but do you really think this? Do you really think a game is playable when titans were having frame rate drops to single digits?
What logic do you have for them pulling the game from sale entirely and spending more time and resources on it?
>>340157663
Same boat as me, is why I started this thread to find out if anyone has played it since its been "fixed"
>>340157772
I've heard all these issues, I'm not expecting it to be better than previous games, just something to play is all now that it is cheap on the steam store too
>>340158127
i played and finished the game on pic related, which is below the minimum requirements. it was also before the latest performance patch.
>>340158427
Well we have similar specs except I have a 7900, I was unable to get out of the intro screen as it kept crashing. This was common enough that it was removed from sale and brought back and apparently fixed.
To say that you didn't have a problem and therefore everyone else is an autist is absurd.
Runs fine now
>>340158127
did the people with Titans try playing the game on low settings or was it beneath them? The game is an unoptimized piece of shit, but it wasn't unplayable.
>>340159280
If you're getting single digit frames I imagine you'd drop the 3 provided settings to low, wouldn't you?
https://youtu.be/WDLVeY4bk44
As you can see the graphics settings allow much customization and fine tuning to help you run the game to your capabilities.
If only video game companies listened to people like you and simply said its an unoptimized piece of shit and everyone who can't actually make it out of the opening game screen is an autist who expects too much
>>340159618
>If you're getting single digit frames I imagine you'd drop the 3 provided settings to low, wouldn't you?
If I had a high end card i wouldn't even sneer at the direction of a low setting. shamefur dispray.
it is still broken but i could play it at about 40-50fps with no drops, though i did have textures on low and the rest on high since i only had a 2GB card.
>>340160084
>40-50fps
>everything on high except textures
>no drops
>on a 2015 release game
>on a 2gb card
So it's fuckin fine now eh?
>>340160305
2GB is tiny for a modern game. Of course that isn't the only property that decides how well a game runs, but yes, you shouldn't expect your 2GB card to be able to run current generation games.
>>340157415
I had a 980 SLI setup and at 1440p the game had large stuttering problems months after release.
That's not acceptable.
>>340160652
>SLI
>stuttering problems
How unexpected
>>340160721
What's your point?
>>340160609
Jesus that scene made my dick jump, it was like a jump scare for my dick.
>>340160846
SLI/Crossfire always stutters
>>340160934
No it doesn't
>>340157224
Just play it on the PS4, it's the definitive version with post processing that the PC version doesn't have.
even with everything on lowest settings (@1080) i was still getting framerate stutters every few minutes, was stable at 60fps otherwise, that was september last year
don't know if they patched again after that
>>340157415
You faggot didn't even play the game at release did you? Couldn't even avoid stuttering at low settings and I have a 750ti
>>340162376
I played it as soon as thepirated versioncame out. i dunno which version that is.
>>340157224
I recently finished it it ran pretty well for the most part in fact I never noticed it going below 60
I think they did an okay job in post-launch but it seems that people are just really mad and don't care about anything because of the original launch was so bad
The game itself is also pretty good if it's as good as Arkham City or close second
>>340160934
>I'm too poor to have had SLI after 2012
the post
>>340163192
>i'm too poor to buy a good card so i use two shitty amd cards
the post
>>340157224
its playable, it was slightly playable at launch if you knew how to make the game use all of your ram instead of limiting itself to less than 4gb.
is it good? no. not really. and one major flaw is the goddamn batmobile. its shoehorned everywhere, you feel like batman wouldnt be able to do anything without it, its not even there as an option (except for roaming), some times the batmobile is the only freaking way batman could deal a threat. fuck you.
>>340157224
> does this mean it's now playable?
It could also mean that basically no one but paid shills is still reviewing it.
>>340163620
>not rubbing the end of the gun against her lips suggestively.
>this thread
My dick can't handle Harley Quinn
Shame she has that ugly cap in this game
>>340167461
what cap?
>>340167858
oh it's part of her suit but you know, that ugly thing on her head
The game's definitely in a much better state than when it released but I think it still has issues with AMD cards with no fix in sight. The game also shits the bed totally if you go SLI.
Other than that, I can get a constant 60fps at 1440p on my 3.4ghz 3570, GTX 970 and 16gb RAM combo with zero stuttering. Although I can't turn on all the bells and whistles, those fancy PhysX shit has to stay turned off.
I refunded it too at first and only got it again because shit was dirt cheap on G2A.
>>340168146
but it's not ugly
>>340165575
>not making her suck the gun
>>340157785
>deleted
>All these lewd Harley pics and webms
>In-game she's voiced by Tara Strong and it ruins everything
>>340157415
>it was always 'playable',
no it wasn't. i had it day one
>>340157663
It was actually better than City but autists complained about the batmobile being a focus in the gameplay. gee it's like they wanted to focus on the newest major element of the game
Knight has a shit ton of fun side quests that blend with the main one perfectly
Asylum>Knight>Origins>City
anyone who thinks City isn't lacking due to not treating the open world aspect correctly, is retarded
>>340157415
>it was always 'playable'
yeah, aparently the console version was always playable, if you got it on any of the consoles you probably had a good time with a game that is pretty much delivering what you would expect after Arkham City and Origins. If you got the PC version you were in for suffering.
>>340157224
Its playable now. I never played it on release so I can't tell you how bad it was back then.
>>340157224
>All these Harley Quinn pics
>>340157632
>Using Linux
That's what you get for being an edgelord, faggot
>>340157224
I pirated when it came out and everyone can agree that the launch was a disaster. I waited and recently bought it from g2a for like 10$ and so far the performance has been pretty good. Constant 60fps even when phsyx and game works on. The only time it dipped to 50-55 is when I call the bat mobile.
Other than that the game is pretty much the same as the other arkham games. One of the best looking games out and is immersive as fuck because you actually feel like batman. Combat is pretty bad and is pretty much the same as the other arkham games.
Also having 16gb and an Ssd seems to eliminate the stuttering.
Started the game on friday and just finished the main story today. It took me 20 hours.
The game is playable but freezes in certain moments, very often, a thing that shouldn't happen at all.
>>340157224
This shit was blown way out of proportion. It was perfectly playable at the time. PR agencies were set up by the other big players to shit on every warner brothers game. Same shit happened with mordor. Watch the next Warner bothers game being targeted too.
>All this Harley
>>340158127
I was playing the game on a single GTX 980 at 4K /30 FPS on release just fine.
>>340165575
Not after the whole shitfit over the Batgirl cover
People really want to like Batman. More than any other super hero. Because of it, people are willing to give Batman associated things free passes. Hell, normalfags loved Dark Knight Rises.
Never had any issues with it and played at release on a 970.
based harley-anon never stop being you
>>340177961
>30 FPS
NO!
>All these Harley Quinn pics and no futa
Fucking why?
he posted harley pics and webms for almost two hours
>>340179152
>Futa
>>340179382
>Not loving futa
>>340179152
>>>/trash/
>>340179489
That's gay, m8
>>340178382
I don't get that shit
fucking superman has misleading covers where he kills jimmy, lana, and lois and batman has ones where he uses guns
>>340178382
Jog my memory, what was this again? I remember a whole thing over I want to say Spidergirl a few years back but I can't remember anything about Batgirl.
>>340163505
>AMD
>Shitty
Nice try,Bernstein.
It's MUCH better now. I recently beat it after putting it off for months thanks to all the issues.
>>340179691
Not if it's a feminine penis :^)
>>340179951
variant cover where Killing Joke Joker is holding Batgirl and drawing a smile on her face with blood
My friend and I both had 970's and it was 1080p60 at ultra from day 1 release. The big update had literally no effect for me since you can't improve perfection. It runs fine as long as your PC doesn't suck.
>>340180157
That's right.
What's even the state of superhero comics anymore? I keep hearing all these controversies but comic books seem just as off mainstream as it always has been.
>>340180287
What are your other specs?
>>340180136
Obligatory
>>340179951
There was a cover with Joker holding a gun to Barbs head while she had a joker smile painted on her, SJW's got butthurt and said it was rape
>>340180418
A 4790K and 8 GB of RAM. Pretty sure my friend's CPU is an i5.
>>340180702
I am bi so I like dudes too. Futa is just the best of both worlds
>>340180859
Which type of i5? Just curious as I'm using an i5 and my computer likes to lag on Arkham City
>>340180887
Oh, fair enough then
any recent epic twists from DC?
>>340157224
are you sure you are not talking about Origins?
AK never had those problems. its just had the streaming problems during races in the late game. over all its the weakest of all them all. too much battank game. too little batmobile game. too little batman game.
>>340181836
>AK never had those problems
>>340157663
youve played the good two.
origins is a weaker city in terms of tight design.
knight was piss poor in terms of challenges. slow tank action instead of batmobile action. and theres only one section that has any batman action like the first two
>>340182045
origins was the one with the horrible roll out. with lack of QA and core things broken for the majority out of the box. it was a shit show all the way through until they pulled it.
ak had some problems day one but fixed good bit of the glaring stuff early. there was some quiet then some noise about the streaming issues.
>>340167461
>ugly cap
I just came here to say you're a fucking faggot holy shit
The cap is the hottest thing about her
>>340157224
Honesly---never had a problem after the day one patch that unlocked framerate. My PC is pretty beefy (i7 @ 4.0ghz, 980ti, 16 GB Ram, SSD), so that could be it.
Haven't kept up with the updates since I beat it a week or so after release. I imagine it has to be better by now.
>>340160934
I had dual 7970ghz for a bit and didn't find the performance gain in MOST games to be worth it. The handful of titles actually coded to use Crossfire do see a near 80% boost in FPS, but most games I had to disable the second card.
Traded both of those for a 980 (with a bit of cash on top). Glad I did, NVIDIA seems more on-point with drivers this generation.
>inb4 NVIDIA Shill
Just stating anecdotal evidence, sorry for the triggering, bois.
