HIT ME
HIT ME
HIT ME
HIT ME
HIT ME WITH THOSE LASER BEAMS
>>340138168
That's fucking cool.
>>340138228
>>340138168
is this a pellet gun?
>>340139348
Its a Glock converted to look like a Nintendo Zapper.
/k/ says hello
>>340139495
it looks tacky, yet still pretty cool. i want to buy a glock so badly, but i'm in california
>>340138168
That's four parts awesome, six parts terrifying.
>>340139495
A guy on /k/ who does a lot of gun mods is trying to make a more accurate looking orange one.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IJhBCiWHZ8w
>>340139640
Glocks are legal in CA, it's just that you can no longer buy Gen 4s from a dealer (You use to be able to convert them to single shot for the sale, then convert them back), only from private party (usually at a premium) due to the roster.
>>340141992
fucking genwunners
THIS. IS. DANGEROUS.
like, really dangerous.really. im literally shaking right now thinking of the damage something like this could cause. tell me again why these things are legal?
What happened to all the light gun games?
>>340145569
Too scary nowadays
>>340145457
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwg6RTjCH7g
>>340145457
Somewhere out there someone legitimately believes this.
>>340139495
isnt this like kind of illegal?
its basically concealing a fireweapon
>>340145457
>get my nintendo glock
>keep it in my collection to show when im entertaining guests
>clean it sometimes when im bored
>occasionally take it to the shooting range
>maybe (read: never have to) defend myself with it.
OH FUCK ITS DANGEROUS
>buy a normal fucking gun
>load it, click the safety off
>drop it by the jungle gym in the park
i didnt have to fucking color it like a nintendo, fuckface. Think about that.
>>340145972
No.
No.
>>340145972
>Fireweapon.
U wat m8?
And no, it's not illegal. It's no different in the eyes of the law than something like engraving. It's still obviously a firearm and it hasn't been modified to change its firing rate or capacity.
>>340139495
>converted
>>340145972
>concealing as a zapper
If you really wanna conceal then use the best method of all and take an umbrella.
>>340145972
No, weapons modification isn't illegal unless it violates NFA rules or other local laws. This particular instance, nothing has been done to make this not a handgun.
Modification has nothing to do with concealment, which is a term used for carrying the "fireweapon" on your person.
>>340138168
Goat song,
Completely gay though... look it up.
killer paint on that gun.
As others have stated it's not illegal, as far as anyone can tell from that pic. However, since it's a post 1968 firearm, if the serial number was removed then it IS illegal. But, it being a Glock, they like to stamp the serial number all over the guns they make. It probably still has it somewhere you just can't see it in the pic.
>>340146651
>>340146730
>you can make a real gun look like a nerf gun/ water gun/ or toy gun and it will be completely legal.
>kinder eggs are illegal
only in america
>>340148045
Guns aren't made for children. Toy filled candy is.
Whats your point?
Here's a video of a different one. Dude even dresses as Mario and has to put down a wounded Yoshi.
https://youtu.be/AJbS5PYQudQ
>>340145734
>>340138168
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJbS5PYQudQ
It's a me, Jerry!
>>340149135
I didn't think I'd ever see somebody wear that Mario costume that gets posted
>>340148045
If you know it's a real weapon, it shouldn't end up in a childs hands anyways.
>>340138168
SOULWAX FM is GOAT station, anything else is dadrock, taco trash, hipster indie shit or memerap
>>340145734
>>340152510
That's just sad.
>>340146651
>it's not illegal
Not the anon you're responding too, but I'm pretty sure Nintendo would take issue with having their name/logo engraved on it, and I'm pretty sure that would fall outside of fair use too.
Ready to read some of the worst comments ever even by Polygon standards?
http://www.polygon.com/2016/4/10/11401312/nintendo-zapper-real-gun-glock
>>340153682
I don't want to give them clicks, screenshot the page for us please
>>340153078
Trademarked logos can be used for personal items as long as you don't sell it.
>>340155892
Yes but the case can be made that it misrepresents/harms public perception of the company who owns the trademark.
>>340156053
That can only apply to something that enters the market. Personal use=do whatever the fuck you want with it.