motion capture isn't animation
- Home
- Board: /v/ - Video Games
- Reading: motion capture isn't animation
>motion capture isn't animation
>>339744761
It isn't, it's motion capture, retard.
It's autotune for digital movies
>>339745181
(You)
There, are you happy now?
>>339744964
>>339745353
You're retarded
>>339744964
>>339745353
they do gotta animate the hands and face tho, make adjustments and stuff. I wonder how many trilby pictures this guy has
Animation is a successive sequence of poses to create motion. So by definition motion capture is animation
>>339744761
>>339745181
>being this buttblasted yesterday you had to make another thread about it today
I'm animating myself calling you a fag.
>>339747220
You sound upset
>>339744761
nice b8 m8
"""""""""""""""""""animation"""""""""""""""""""""
>>339744761
It isn't. There's no argument here. Anyone who is even remotely involved in film/vidya creation is aware of this.
>>339748402
Saying motion capture is animation it's the same as if you took a picture, adjuested it a bit on photoshop and called it a painting.
Fuck mo-cap when it's done where it's not needed, makes the characters in games, SPECIALLY in anime games look like people wearing fucking mascot costumes or some shit.
>>339747220
what kind of life would a person have to have to post the same thread on /v/ twice in 2 days just to get epic responses?
> it isn't animation because I don't approve of the technique being used
