We got new screenshots of Civ 6
Let's start speculatingor completely shit on them
Damn all this compression
I got them from here btw: http://franchise.civilization.com/en/games/civilization-vi/
Looks a bit too cartoony for my taste and it will probably be barebones on release date just like 4 and 5. Might be good after a year or two after the release though.
This new Terra Incognita Fog of War shit they've added is absolutely terrible. I get the AESTHETICS appeal and perhaps it'd make it so that worse hardware can run the game, but hopefully there's an option to change it to Civ V style and not this ugly bullshit they have now.
>>339639106
I like it
I hope they make largest possible maps bigger.
If they don't, with multi tile cities, it would mean that late game True Start game would have countries like Germany and France be comprised of single city, two at best.
JUST CHANGE THE FUCKING GRASS TEXTURES AND IT WOULD LOOK FINE JESUS CHRIST IT LOOKS LIKE SHIT
>>339639106
>>339639254
me too.
Also I like the cliffs protecting your coast against invasion. I wonder if we can build ships even with a city next to a cliff.
looks a lot better zoomed out, which is probably how you'll end up playing it
still not going to but it until all the dlcs and patches are released
i hope sullla does a write up where the shits all over the game, those were the best parts of vanilla civ v
Will the maps themselves be bigger or what
>>339639326
There will be a 64-bit client (and multithreaded AI) so I assume there will be support for much bigger maps
>>339639576
With unit movement speed apparently unchanged it seems like it'll be incredibly tedious.
>>339639471
What do you mean? You could make the maps massive in the last game and populate them with as many or as few people as you wanted.
>>339639337
This plus making the tree density higher for forest and jungle tiles
>>339639852
Scratch that, units move even slower than before.
>>339638307
what the fuck is wrong with the water?
I like the look.
I can understand people wanting it to see more realistic, which is totally fine, but I've always enjoyed the more cartoony, colorful look in games.
Holds up better over time for one thing, where the current hyper realism doesn't hold up in just a few years.
I haven't dug into 5 much still, last I played a ton of was 4.
Should probably get on that.
I like how uninhabited areas are washed out
>>339638307
while I don't really care for the cartoony style it looks pretty clean when zoomed out like that
>>339639975
Instead of Civ 5's fog of war (just darkened shit), they replaced it with a map-like texture
>>339639975
Fog of war, obviously.
>>339639337
Just noticed that.
Looks like the weird grass stuff you see on train model towns.
fog of war looks really cool, i havent seen something like that before.
The artstyle is total shit and makes it look like a mobile ripoff game if you zoom in even slightly. I bet it'll be on mobiles a year or two later, even.
Bet the gameplay will be the most watered down ever too.
>>339638307
>>339638375
>>339638641
looks comfy af
>those waves
cartoon graphics are shit but their new gameplay features seem pretty good
also this is being made on a brand new engine specifically built for 64bit, multithreading, and modding support
Looks fine but if it's bare bones on release I'm happy I onky got into civ v recently so I have a civ game to tide me over until 6 has some actual content
Looks comfy
>>339639852
>>339639943
is this bait or are you really retarded
>>339640413
All we know that's being removed from Civ 5 + expansions is the World Congress (which is a good thing, diplomatic victory a shit)
>>339638307
Looks like iOS game, but I dig this fog of war.
I wonder if they'll actually release a full game this time or do what they always do and release half a game on release day then slowly release pieces of the other half that should have been in the first release over an agonizing 5 year period at ridiculous costs.
>>339639975
It's sick. Get well soon, water.
>>339640643
Religion, espionage, trade routes, etc. will all be there. Civ 6 is being made by the same guy who did Civ 5's expansions.
Still looks like some mobile garbage.
Even worse with the UI on, the UI looks literally like something out of a tablet game.
>>339640235
>The artstyle is total shit
Eugh, this so much. Looks terrible.
>whoops! spilled some coffee on my world map!
>>339640235
there has never been a bad civ core game+exp
people cried about the death of the series at III, IV, V. Look at how those games turned out, all better than the last with time and expansions.
VI looks promising.
>we want Clash of Clans audience
I feel like I'm the only one that likes the art style
>>339640907
lmao civ "fans" are literal addicts. they'll play any shit squeezed on their plate, case in point civ 5
>terrible optimization, late-game virtually unplayable
>micro-dlc at launch
>broken until expansions
>multiplayer STILL doesn't work
>>339641163
I didn't like it when it was first revealed but it's growing on me
The new info on the game mechanics is pretty promising as well
>>339641105
when they go back to clash of clans, their wallets will be lighter, so there's that.
it could have 8-bit graphics, as long as it plays well, nothing of value was greatly lost.
>>339640907
Stop it, you're bringing out the Civ 4 fags
Whats the point of a fog of war if it reveals 90% of what you need to know? I mean I like the visual appeal of it but it defeats the purpose.
>>339641163
Nah, I like it too.
It's not that it's fucking great, but it looks nice enough.
Take a look at something like Beyond Earth for an art style that gets really annoying. Civ6 looks fine.
>>339641421
What do you mean? Civ 5 also had fog of war
>>339638307
I need another civ game like I need a fourth liver.
Modded Civ 3 was the best game in the series.
>>339641421
It's the kind of fog that covers areas you've explored in the past, but don't have vision over currently.
>>339641601
This
>Tiny amount of troops in a military unit
Looks like I'll have to mod the fuck out of it to make it not look like shit. Again.
>>339641670
Just say "le upvote" next time.
>>339640469
why would it be bait anon
>>339638307
it looks like Civ Revolution
>>339641219
They're fucking deluded.
Most of them have never played a complicated game in their lives and/or never played III and IV.
>>339641163
I like it too.
Cept there are very loud whiners and the people who likes it don't give a fuck to voice their opinion. Like everything /v/ ever bitch a bout.
>>339641714
because you can disable unit animations in game options?
>Liked building tall or doing silly one city challenges and stacking wonders
>Can no longer do that and now the game caters entirely to building super wide
Why did they kill tall?
>>339641930
Fuck you, this isn't a hugbox.
I'll bitch about whatever I want.
>>339641163
>>339641930
Hated it at first, but the screens posted in this thread look great.
>>339642056
They realized that Civ is a 4x game and encouraging tall is retarded.
>>339642056
>4x
>eXplore, eXpand, eXploit, and eXterminate
>eXpand
Fuck off faggot, Civ isn't for you
Make forests more dense,
Change the texture of the ground,
Give units the same amount of soldiers than Civ 5
>>339641163
I wish you were. Unfortunately, there are a lot of faggots like you.
I have to admit it looks good zoomed out though.
>>339642123
I feel inclined to agree with you.
I'm just wondering if the continents are always visible like that or if that's like a post-explored fog of war.
>>339642173
>Give units the same amount of soldiers than Civ 5
I'm sure it's like that in Civ 6 because you can embed units now
>>339641960
>animations
It's tedious because it consumes a lot of turns to move your army across the map.
From a distance the art is growing on me, but I still dislike the thin trees and flat grass.
Have they fixed the retarded AI?
>>339639106
i like the look of it but i think once you reveal an area it should revert to the traditional style.
GET RID OF HEXEGON TILES JESUS CHRIST WE USED TO HAVE 8 DIRECTIONS OF MOVEMENT WHY IS THAT SO HARD
is it me or does it look like villages may be back? I'm seeing a bunch of smaller scale tile improvements that are not cities, trade posts or forts
>>339642521
AI will always be retarded compared to a human.
They've removed the flavors and added actual leader agendas though, so I'm hopeful they'll at least appear competent.
>>339642521
Retarded AI will always be a problem in video games. Why do people still expect human-level intelligence in so many games?
>>339642521
They said the AI is gonna be multithreaded this time around, and that their goals will be more clear
They're adding AI "agendas" that are unique to a certain leader. For example, Teddy Roosevelt will amass a big army and destroy anyone who warmongers on his continent. Cleopatra will ally herself with leaders that have big armies, or declare war on leaders that have small armies.
any way to make map in civ5 even bigger that biggest standard? like 5-10 times bigger?
>>339642056
first off one city challenge is meant to be a challenge
second going tall is absurdly good in this game, wide play is situational and tall play can be good on almost any start, 3-4 city tradition is the most consistent way to win games
>>339642578
Hexagons are objectively superior to squares
squares are either 8 movement, in which case diagonal movement is superior to lateral movement always (moving two squares at the same time instead of 1) which just feels wrong, or they're 4 movement at which point hexes have more
on top of that hexes look more organic
>>339642578
Hex is life. Deal with it faggot
>>339642521
the ai isn't THAT retarded, the way that elizabeth or alexander manage to have distinct flavours to them is pretty well done in civ v
>>339639387
i actually like that. it did bug me that literally any tile bordering on the ocean was suddenly suitable to host a seaport
>>339642763
honestly if they make wide the baseline instead of tall I couldn't be more happy
just having 4 to 6 massive cities is boring, to many games in V where even lategame borders barely met
>>339642630
Considering how we have computers that win against human chess champions, it's not unreasonable to expect a Civ AI that try to capture a city with no siege units.
Remember that a lot of early practical AI developments came from vidya.
>>339642745
So no more denounce spam, bipolar civs and ludicrously one sided deals?
>>339640907
V was always shit.
>>339642993
Stop comparing Chess to Civilization
I hope this game'll add more lategame movement options like say building tunnels and canals
>>339643037
pls stop meme posting
I like the map texture for fog of war.
>>339643164
Casual civ player detected.
>>339643268
I don't get it, IV was easier than V.
>>339642994
I can't make any promises about those things. We'll have to wait and see.
[HATE MAP TEXTURE]
>>339643268
casual and still played IV to death.
Pls stop meme posting
>>339643393
>>339643437
Stop responding to him
>>339643268
isn't a beard and baldness a common sign of high testosterone levels?
>>339642763
I'd prefer the option though. I want a city whose perk is like Venice. What about a single city civ but they can work like double the tiles or an extra ring of tiles? Then again that might be OP for production on wonders.
>>339642323
>I'm just wondering if the continents are always visible like that or if that's like a post-explored fog of war.
If unexplored, it's still the same map texture but with no "drawings" on it
Seems like everything in that screenshot is explored
>>339642323
Here's what the fog looks like if you haven't explored it
Got this image from Marbozir's video (he played the first sixty turns and he talks about new mechanics over prerecorded footage): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K0RGfYAiuR8
Don't give a shit about the graphics. All i want is good AI, good music, good narration and gameplay variety.
>>339643268
is lobos really a nu-male?
I find this dissapointing
>>339642768
Triangles are objectively superior to hexagons.
>>339644621
a hexagon is SIX triangles
thus hexagon > triangle
>>339642763
Have you played FfH2 for civ 4?
>>339645296
We're talking about Civ 5 where 9 times out of 10, it's not worth going wide
This shouldn't happen in a 4X game
I hope they bring back the strategic mode with the little art tiles. I didnt like that being removed in BE.
>Beyond Earth was so bad everybody forgot about it
From the cancerous civilization choices onwards it was all downhill. Rest in piece you shitty fucking game
>>339645546
Marbozir says it's in Civ 6
wide was the name of the game in base civ v, it wasn't really until brave new world that it really got pushed to tall
>>339645672
Link me to the part in his video or a post please.
>>339638307
I am ok with everything except the fucking ground textures.
It doesn't look like different biomes anymore, just some smeared colors.
>>339639326
>I hope they make largest possible maps bigger.
So that you can have even bigger carpets?
>>339641219
>>multiplayer STILL doesn't work
? I just played an 1300 turn match last night. Ran 60fps in late game on dx11. Maybe your pc isn't too good.
>>339645835
>>339646071
wew
>people unironically play in Strategic View
Thats some next level autism
>>339646681
Its designed fortablets and low end PC's
>>339644308
>Movement 2/3
I hope this is not just scouts. and there is an increase in unit mobility
>>339647014
I'd say one of V's flaws was the individual tiles were to big
drastically increase tile numbers and at the same time increase unit movement to compensate
>>339647014
Warriors have 2/2, as shown here.
>>339646089
>resync
>game can have massive delays for no discernable reason
>some people crash or disconnect if they have certain screens open during turn transititions
>resync
>you can't do anything while someone is hotjoining, but the turn timer still ticks down
>automating a unit resets turn timer
>resync
>>339642056
It's a fucking empire building game, not a city building game.
>>339642056
Because in civ5 the global happiness basically forced you into building tall
>>339647432
Only had 2 resyncs with 4 human and 4 ai players. No delay in turns. Try playing without turn timers.
>>339646071
There must be a good caption for this.
How the fuck are they doing positive on cash though?
>>339646071
>turn 236
>science +97
>>339647409
>>339641163
It looks good zoomed out. It looks ridiculous close up. Close up it just seems inadequate to represent normal civ shit. I can't imagine nukes going off in the art style for example. I
>>339647486
Dont care nerd. Game options trump your silly concept of realism.
>>339641163
fix the forests/jungles and rivers and I will
I hope they make diplomatic victories not a meme.
It's impossible to win diplomatically in multiplayer civ 5, and in singleplayer it takes so many votes that you will end up winning through culture or someone will win through science first.
>>339647409
The size/distances in Civ6 will be even more fucked up than in previous games.
>a city will be 7 tiles
>the average unit has 2 movement speed
>a soldier will need 3-4 turns just to cross his capitol city
JUST
What french leader other than memepoleon or meme gaulle could you use?
>>339648862
Robespierre.
>>339648562
They said one victory from Civ 5 is getting replaced with another type of victory. They also said World Congress is getting canned. So I'm guessing Diplomatic Victory is the victory that is getting replaced.
>>339648862
>>339648943
Maybe the Sun King?
>>339649017
>>339648562
Diplomatic victory is being replaced by religious victory.
What entitles a religious victory, I don't know.
>>339648862
Kinda maybe Charlemange
>>339648759
Build roads you libertarian fuck
>>339649248
http://well-of-souls.com/civ/civ6_overview.html
>>339649327
Could you even call Charlememe french?
>>339649431
That's the thing, workers (now builders) will no longer be able to build roads. Roads will be built by merchants. Though I guess this means that they will no longer cost maintenance.
>>339649606
Traders build roads automatically as they trade, and you can get military engineers in the mid game which build roads and forts wherever you want them.
>>339649431
You want me to build roads to my enemies cities? Plus workers are different now and limited in their abilities. Movement is gonna be a slog since you no longer can move into forest/hills/etc with only 1 movement point.
>>339649692
>you can get military engineers in the mid game which build roads and forts wherever you want them.
I haven't heard of this yet, may I have a source?
>>339649478
I did say kinda.
They do reference barbarian origins with the Germans so it wouldn't be too unrealistic.
Obviously wouldn't fit the usual uniques late french aesthetic though.
So yeah, you could call him French; but still a weaker option than the top meme French.
>>339649853
http://au.ign.com/articles/2016/05/25/civilization-6s-new-game-changer-features
>>339649694
Are you pretending walking your units to enemies wasn't already a 200+ year slog?
>>339649921
Thanks, I read that article before but I guess I missed that detail.
>>339642993
Those AI machine take millions dollar to create. That shit not going in a video game
They should really stop showing these zoomed-in screenshots, no one is gonna play the game like that.
>>339638307
needs better contrastotherwise it's pretty good
>>339641731
The best civ game
>>339650662
Darkening the fog makes it look a bit too cramped
>>339650662
dark fog looks horrible
>>339648862
Descartes
I just hope researching Satellites actually gives sight of the whole map unfogged
Are they going to have huge luxury imbalances like in civ 5?
Where getting a salt/gems start was infinitely better than pearls/incest or elephants/wine.
>>339651321
would be cooler if you could build satelites and put into orbit, idk how they worked in BE but maybe it was something like this
>c IV ilization
>ci V ilization
>ci VI lization
There's also room for ci VII ization, it's likeShall the clay say to him that fashioneth it, What makest thou?
New perk for America: Right to bear arms
-Workers cannot be captured inside friendly territory.
-Workers function as a weaker military unit when attacked in friendly territory. Workers cannot build if they have lost 35% HP . Workers cannot attack other units, only defend.
*To not spam workers, workers cost as many hammers as a contemporary land unit would when at war.
*Workers cost an additional +2 GPT to maintain during war as to not spam workers before war starts. Workers actively building cost only +1 GPT in times of war..
>>339638307
Honestly, it's not so bad zoomed out.
>>339651597
lol okay champ
>>339651597
Manifesting your destiny is the fundamental goal of America and you will never be able to change that.
>>339651597
unique building: McDonalds
provides extra food on cattle and wheat, but also increase maintaince cost of the hospital
>>339649478
>>339649138
Well they have cleopatra for egypt, so...
>>339650545
I do faggot
>>339652253
>>339652075
https://franchise.civilization.com/en/news/2016-05-theodore-roosevelt-leads-the-americans-in-civilization-vi/
The fact that "Square Deal" is bolded leads me to believe that that is what America's UA will be called. Wish we actually knew what it would do in-game though.
Also it seems each Civ will have three Uniques rather than two.
>>339652545
>Also it seems each Civ will have three Uniques rather than two.
I like that, one unique building/improvement and two units. It might make carthage good.jk they will enver be good both their units are garbage
>>339652667
>Square Deal
His policies reflected three basic ideas: conservation of natural resources, control of corporations, and consumer protection.[2] These three demands are often referred to as the "three C's" of Roosevelt's Square Deal. Thus, it aimed at helping middle class citizens and involved attacking plutocracy and bad trusts while at the same time protecting business from the most extreme demands of organized labor.
So economic focus
>>339652667
>jk they will enver be good both their units are garbage
What's wrong with them?
>>339652995
They're not very good.
>>339638307
This really looks like one of those games you see in shady ads that say shit like "come play my lord".
>>339652253
kek
>>339652995
All you use triremes for is scouting and maybe capturing a coastal city. The quinqueirmeameieme doesn't have anything going for it other than slightly more strength which is irrelevant since you usually only slam melee units into cities when they are super low health to capture them
You use horsemen for capturing cities too, since they can zoom across the map, and getting close to range units to attack them. The elephant costs more hammers and has less movement, so it doesn't do what the horsemen does as well. For instance moving onto forested hill uses all its movement instead of leaving it with one left.
>>339649692
I like this. I was always too lazy to manually control my workers, so they would always just go on auto. They just fucking loved unnecessary roads. One game I had all coastal cities with harbors, and I couldn't stop them from spamming roads every turn.
>>339647409
>appeal
so i can't load up my continent with great engineer buildings any more?i fucking LOVE micromanagement. no really i do
>>339650662
>>339650721
>>339650912
Needs to be somewhere in between
>>339654293
I'm guessing appeal has something to do with tourism
>>339652995
>horseman
>12 combat strength
>4 movement
>75 hammers
>companion cavalry (greek's horseman)
>14 combat strength
>5 movement
>75 hammers
>generate great generals faster promotion
>cataphract (byzantine horseman)
>15 combat strength
>3 movement
>75 hammers
>benefits from defensive terrain
>slightly better against cities (-25% instead of -33%. Useless)
>african forest elephant (carthage's horseman)
>14 combat strength
>3 movement
>100 hammers
>generate great generals faster promotion
>-10% combat strength to nearby enemies (basically useless since that's like -1 strength to most things)
>doesn't use horses
Someone post the roll chart for civ 5 I want to play it.
>>339638375
Crater Lake natural wonder confirmed?
>>339647409
I kind of like the graphics, but the UI is absolutely vomit inducing. I get that it's in a rather early stage of production, but I don't remember the previous games having promotion screenshots with UI this shitty.
>>339654880
quill18 says it's not finished yet, we'll have to wait
>>339654847
holy fuck, could be
>>339640907
None of those games are as good as Civ II was.
Art style for areas undiscovered is better than that for things in the play area.
>>339638307
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nPzBh_sufKU
>>339654880
The UI isn't any worse than V's is.
They need make shit not XBOX HUEG
>>339654847
What yield would it give?
Just science?
>>339655012
>undiscovered
What's in the OP is all discovered
This is what undiscovered looks like, empty parchment:
>>339644308
>>339638307
To hell with army units. If it's anything like Civ 5 you make workers with every perk and ability you have and you can over build any society you want. Bribe people like mad and make allies out of everyone.
>>339655145
science or faith. i am of the opinion that all natural wonders should give faith as they're wonders
>>339655170
Exactly.
>>339655245
Maybe have a +1 culture +1 faith as a base line, and give them all tourism when you research flight or something.
>>339655245
whynotboth.jpeg
Honestly I love making a religion and watching it spread like a plague.
>>339655675
i agree. lately in my civving i've been starting more wars about religion than anything else
i am beginning to understand religious zealotry
Is Gandhi going to have a nuclear fetish again?
>>339655757
>I ask what is, to my mind, the most important question of all. If a leader's traits are historical, will Gandhi be less fond of nuclear armageddon? "We have a special way of handling him. Initially he's going to seem very peaceful, but he'll have a dark side."
Maybe
>>339655757
How did that meme even start?
>>339655757
its more than a fetish at this point
>>339655743
It's the ultimate tool for stupid people.
>>339655675
>>339655743
>According to GadgetHelpLine, there is now a Religious Victory, and religion allows you to breed Inquisitors, apostles, and the ability to conquer foreign cities through religious fervor alone.
might be cool, might be complete bullshit
>>339655931
back in Civ 1 Gandhi had an aggression level of 1, which was the lowest it could go, 10 being the highest. When Gandhi learned Democracy and switched to it, his aggression goes down by 1 point.
as there's no 0 in programming, it went to 255. hilarity ensues
>>339638307
>>339638375
>>339638641
>Civ, the biggest 4x there is tries to ape the art style of Endless Legend
>Ends up looking like a mobile game
fucking clown shoes
>>339655757
Why did they make Gandhi a war monger? I've been Washington with Russia as and ally and honestly he nuked Catherine to death and nearly me. The AI even nuked barbarians
>>339656148
Ghandi is not a warmonger in Civ 5. He just really really really likes nukes. Don't fuck with him in the late-game.
>>339642056
I'm sure there'll be some civ that allows you to go full tall.
Maybe a single city that doesn't have border caps
>>339655952
That's how some battles were won in the 12th century.
>>339643534
How do you think they reach such high testosterone levels? It's from slurping out other men's cum out of pussies. IT ALL ADDS UP ANONYMOUS, WAKE UP SHEEPLE
>>339656129
endless legend looks horrible tho, this only needs better forest and grass
They're making it for the Civ V audience. It's gonna be shit.
>>339656072
not to be autistic but it must've gone lower than 0 as there most definitively are 0 in "computer numbers"
>>339655952
I hope this comes with the ability to choose a state religion
Civ V Complete is objectively the best in the series
>>339656707
What was wrong with Civ V? I was great. Beyond Earth was shit.
>>339656856
shhhh you'll trigger the civ4fags
>>339644308
Oh that's the fog? Fuck me I should've realized. Makes the water look strange but makes sense
>>339656830
Unsigned int or short is 0-255.
It was probably 0 to start and then when it went down it had to loop back to 255.
Thoughts?
http://well-of-souls.com/civ/civ6_overview.html
>>339656856
>not Civ IV Complete
>>339656903
fuck you, I'm saying it anyway
The fog of war is fucking amazing and it sounds like it's going to be good but the style man, why.
Also I just can't stand their insular city bullshit anymore. Not being able to properly share food, production, etc between cities is retarded.
>>339656903
I used to be a 4fag. I still think it has far better AI than 5 and mechanics that the AI can more easily use, but I would still probably agree that 5 complete is best civ now.
Besides, Soren moved on and made Offworld Trading Company which is the greatest RTS.
>>339656994
The improvement that makes me most hopeful. Social policies in 5 turned out to be ass, it looks like this may finally give us the chance to have a Civ game with meaningful government choices
>>339656979
>>Oh that's the fog?
There's two types of fog
Fog that you haven't explored (which would be clouds in Civ 5 and empty map parchment in Civ 6)
see >>339644308
And there's the fog that you have explored (which would be the darkened areas in Civ 5 and a drawn map in Civ 6)
see >>339638307
>>339638307
That's a pretty cool shader, Why can i see the entire map tho?
>>339657278
see
>>339657221
All the stuff in the OP has already been explored and drawn
>>339656994
I really like this.
It feels kinda like Sliders/National Ideas from Europa Universalis, which is a much better system for governments than what Civ usually gets.
>>339656691
then laugh at them for trying to copy it
>>339656148
It's a running joke in the development team. In civilization 1, there was a bug where Gandhi's aggression level was originally set to 1, with 10 being the highest. After reaching Democracy and switching to it, his aggression goes down by 1 point, which set set his aggression level to 255.
>>339656994
>"There were always a lot of things in the tech tree like 'chivalry' that weren't really a technology."
I wonder which specifically from Civ 5 even are going to be put on the culture tree.
>>339658012
well just go down the tech tree. Guilds? Not a tech. Chivarly? Not a tech. Archeology?
>>339640469
movement speed as in movement per turn you knob jockey
>>339650912
>>339654381
better?
>>339658012
Guilds? Drama and Poetry? Education? Chivalry? Philosophy? Theology? Archeology? Would you consider these "techs"?
>>339658275
Now we're talking.
Oh nice, a new installment of the spin off series, civilization revolutions
>>339658279
Also Economics, Globalization, Architecture, Civil Service, etc.
>>339658275
wont the original just be fine since you'll easily be able to tell that its fog anyway? or is it a brightness comfort thing
>>339638307
Increase the tree density on forrest tiles.
Make the color of the tiles blend better than not at all.
>>339638375
I literally can't fucking make out the units.
>>339659574
I see Archers, Spearmen, and a Catapult (that's possibly embedded with Warriors?)
>>339658920
Honestly I have a hard time distinguishing between fogged and non-fogged areas in the original. If you look at it in an image editor the values and saturation for the fogged area are almost identical to the nonfogged; the only difference is the yellowish hue. Hell I just now realized that I completely missed the nonfogged area in the upper right corner. That's how indistinguishable they are.
For an artstyle that claims to be about readability it leaves a lot to be desired, the tree density being another issue frequently brought up.
>>339659750
Where?
>>339644552
He is a literal furry and SJW.
>>339638307
Is this an IPhone game?
>>339659785
Good points
Maybe if the fog art direction went in a different direction like looking more like a sketched outline of what that area is supposed to be from atop. Two separate art styles that could possibly unify somehow
>>339638307
The sepia fog of war area looks better than the line of sight area.
>>339655853
I'm guessing peace loving until he's strong and then genocide his enemies.
It doesn't look THAT bad...
>>339656707
>5th most popular game on steam
Damn right they want the Civ V audience.
>>339650019
This just makes it even worse so he's right to complain.
>>339638307
Hey, isn't that the stupid game that Kate Upton shills for on TV?
>>339660691
Yeah, it's too bad.
