w3
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /v/ - Video Games
You are currently reading a thread in /v/ - Video Games
Blood and wine seems to be a smash hit according to people who bought it.
>people who like game enough to buy expansion play expansion
>expansion is like game they like already
>people like expansion
A bunch of people bought TW3 and it wasn't what they wanted.
Nobody bought blood and wine and expected something else.
>>339553908
did they make the combat good?
No? Alright then, I'll be over here playing GOTY 2015 Bloodborne.
>>339554059
>A bunch of people bought TW3 and it wasn't what they wanted.
Retards maybe, it's the third game in a fucking trilogy and so much of the bitching came from people who never ever touched or heard of 1 and 2.
>>339554374
>Retards maybe, it's the third game in a fucking trilogy
That plays nothing like the old games and tries to pander to open world retards
>>339554374
More people bought TW3 than TW1 and TW2. This is because the series gained momentum and people new to the games tried 3 before 1 or 2.
>>339554446
Oh, one of you guys who only played 2 I see. 2 plays like total shit and is nothing like 1 or 3, but 1 plays like a far less polished and very clunky version of 3 which is ironically why people bitch about it - because 1's combat was not to a lot of people's tastes and 3 is identical to it as well as the preparation stage.
>>339554446
It plays similarly to w2, the biggest complaints at w3 launch was basically "this isnt skyrim, therefore it sucks" while everyone that liked w2 loved it.
>>339553908
GOTY 2 years in a row?
How the fuck do they do it?
How do we stop them, bros?
>>339554446
You obviously have no idea what you're talking about. You are basically another one of those elitist contrarians who says any game that does well and/or is well liked is shit somehow. When's the last time you had fun?
>>339554269
We get it, you like bloodborne PS4 users.
We get it already.
GOTY though? That's kinda sad. Must have a ton of shit games. The games great, but to be GOTY...?
>>339554953
Bloodborne has great gameplay, lore, and atmosphere. Historically great, even.
Witcher 3 is literally batman vision + cutscenes + terrible, awful combat.
It's clear in the eyes of any patrician which is the superior game.
>>339555175
I never even fucking said that Witcher 3 was GOTY. I just think it's a good game.
I also think bloodborne is a good game. but not GOTY.
Is reading that hard for you?
It's a thread about witcher 3 and its expansions. Report derailers and shitposters.
It might very well be worth 20euros.
>>339554717
>It plays similarly to w2, the biggest complaints at w3 launch was basically "this isnt skyrim, therefore it sucks" while everyone that liked w2 loved it.
I fucking loved TW2didn't play it until EEand I feel like TW3 was worse than TW2 in a lot of areas. Don't get me wrong, I liked TW3 but it never surpassed TW2:EE or TW1 act4-5 for me.
>Alchemy simplified further
>Quests simplified further
>Parrying and Quen made even more overpowered
>level requirements on gear/weps
>bloat of legendary items, 90% of which are useless
>boss fights are bland and boring except the crones fight
>Empty open world instead of a nice, small, well made hub-based zones
>bosses are bland and boring
I won't even get started on the story inconsistencies between TW1+2 to TW3
>>339557234
W2 was great and I was sceptical of open world idea but it ended up being the right choice.
Theres no way to have as much content otherwise and they did mostly everything correctly.
>>339557234
I'd like to see them drop the RPG aspect entirely for the next Witcher game in 10 years.
Its pretty good
