They did it

>18% on RT
They sure did.

File: 1386324689264.gif (775KB, 245x245px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

775KB, 245x245px

>>339502069
>RT

File: Forbidden Numbers.png (212KB, 312x441px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

212KB, 312x441px

>>339501151
>7.0 is good

>>339502450
For a movie review score, yeah.

For IGN, FFUuuUck no

File: 1449101213880.png (23KB, 587x466px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

23KB, 587x466px

>>339502142
...and?

>>339501151
Oh look, another shilling review from IGN. What a surprise. *Yawn*

File: 667557.jpg (45KB, 540x960px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

45KB, 540x960px

>reviewing movies like games

>>339504374
both groups look so happy, if only I could have this in life.

>>339504209
RT gives Babadook a 98% while Synecdoche, New York and Antichrist get a 69% and 50%.

File: 20160528_073102.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>339504978
...and?

>>339504978
>RT gives
You might be mistaken on what Rotten Tomatoes is

File: Screenshot_20160529-121128.jpg (588KB, 1320x1625px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

588KB, 1320x1625px

>trusting IGN
>ever

>>339504978
>he likes Synecdoche, New York and Antichrist

How's grade 11 treating you?

>>339504978
The Babadook was good tho.

Not mindblowing but it was a nice movie.

>unafraid to take risks

Like what?