[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y / ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo

Nvidia GTX 1080


Thread replies: 478
Thread images: 103

Gigabyte or Asus or MSI ?
>>
MSI
>>
>>339372079

the msi 980ti was the worst of the three
>>
Wait for Polaris.
>>
>>339372347
This. The 1080 is good as will the 1070 be surely but why fuck yourself over when you won't have too long to make a comparison? A month or two at most?
>>
>>339372347
> wait wait wait wait wait wait
>>
>>339372007
Good goy
>>
>>339372007
ASUSSSSSSS FOR LIFEEEE :D
>>
>>339372007
I think Gigabyte GTX970 is the best and most balanced out of the three, so I'll go with them again in 3 years or so when I feel the need for upgrade.
>>
File: 1452963086355.jpg (421KB, 1294x1230px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1452963086355.jpg
421KB, 1294x1230px
>>339372347
>poolaris
Fuck off, Rakesh.
>>
>>339372007
always gigabyte
>>
>>339372007
>have a single titanX
>can max out everything i play
>can play VR with no issues
ill wait, the improvements are not that much still, maybe when the TI comes out.
>>
>>339372007
Not getting evga, is this (you) bait?
>>
Gygabite if you have the room
>>
>>339372007
MSI
>>
Asus for silky smooth PCB
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4gRpuurPsuc
>>
>>339372347
>Wait for Polaris.

Why? What does polaris do? I was considering an r9 nano

Also
>waiting

Some of us live among hyenas that will devour our riches if we don't spend away, waiting is not an option.
>>
>>339376745
with their new cards nvidia is in a position to ask for hilarious prices atm since AMD cant/wont/doesnt want to compete right now
great cards but their price policy is honestly cheeky
>>
>>339376745
>Some of us live among hyenas that will devour our riches if we don't spend away, waiting is not an option
Where the fuck do you live? China?
>>
Any of you guys know how much previous generation cards usually drop by?

I'm willing to pay for a 970, but I want the 980 or the 980 TI. Will either of those drop closer to the 970 in terms of price?

Yea I'm new to pc upgrading and all that
>>
>>339377084

Iunno man, can't afford 1080, 1070 will take some time to come out yet. I could also get a msi 980 for the same asking price.

>>339377259

No, with my family.
>>
>>339377567

Also, I can pick an adittional gtx 780 and go sli, but sounds stupid even to me.
>>
File: 2 (1).png (535KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
2 (1).png
535KB, 1280x720px
>bought a 970 a few months ago for $300
>1070 is only $70 more
fuck
>>
>>339378014
>read about gtx 1070 for 370 dollars
>time to go shopping
>450 euro
>>
Asus if you have an Asus motherboard
>>
Why pick a videocard when you can buy a console?
>>
File: 1453659019343.gif (68KB, 300x153px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1453659019343.gif
68KB, 300x153px
>>339378849
>>
>>339378849
>why buy a turbo when i can buy a bicycle?
>>
>>339378270
you don't like reading that much an on, do you
>>
>>339377374
Yeah, they should drop by a considerable amount, I would expect it to fall to at least 500.
>>
>>339372007
EVGA > Gigabyte > MSI > literal garbage >>>> Asus
>>
File: 1444010952207.jpg (89KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1444010952207.jpg
89KB, 1280x720px
>>339372347
>wait for polaris
>it comes out
>wait for 1100 series
>it comes out
>wait for...
Just fuck you faggot
>>
>>339372007
Whatever you can find on sale you dunce. It almost never matters unless the warranties are different or it comes factory overclocked if you care about that kind of thing.
>>
>nvidigoys

kek pity you desu
>>
>>339380917
I don't think about you at all
>>
>>339372007
Cheapest one, if you wait a little more chepeast oc-ed one then lower the factory oc to stanrdard oc - boom you have temperatures better than imagined, and longevity.

The chip is made by nvidia and it's the same on every single card, be it a shitty brand still has the same graphic chip inside..
>>
>>339380709
Except the wait here is tiny.
I'm no AMDfag but you're being childish.
>>
>>339381078
Too busy thinking about how to fix your intentionally-crippled yet overpriced video cards?
>>
>>339372007
>new series out
>x50
>x60
>x70
>x80
>slightly different degrees of price and performance
>all released within a few months of each other

Can someone explain why this isn't fucking stupid? Why would you ever buy the lowest tier? Why not just have one card for every series? Why create shittier ones so you can save like twenty buckaroos?
>>
>>339381846
because you can actually save hundreds of buckeroos buckeroos
>>
>>339378849
>why pick a toilet when you have a loo
>>
>>339378849
why play games when you can read books for free at a library? plebs not investing that $1700 you would spend on a gaming pc
>>
File: 1411438947859.jpg (20KB, 185x182px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1411438947859.jpg
20KB, 185x182px
>>339382307
>paying $2 to have your library card printed
>>
>>339372347
but polaris is shit compared to pascal
>>
>>339382307
>all that money you lost by wasting time traveling to and from the library instead of working
>>
Come on 1070, release already. My shit rig with a 640GT is bleeding and dying over here.
>>
>>339382307
>Pay for library card, with the chance that the library might not have the book(s) you want to read, in a public space that you have to travel all the way to
Vs.
>Pay for computer, get all books you can think of in the comfort and privacy of your own home
>>
>>339376745
buy two Polaris, put them in crossfire and you can almost match a single 1080 for the same price... in half a year
>>
>>339382568
>reading anything on an electronic screen and risking eye damage
>not having text to voice enabled for reading shitposts on the internet
>>
>>339372007
The real question is, when the one with smaller form factor comes out? I need it for my small neat steambox.
>>
File: +1.png (3KB, 80x53px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
+1.png
3KB, 80x53px
>>339382759
>>
Gigabyte is shit for overclock.
Asus is loud as fuck.
MSI tends to have the most competent heatsink builds, and good overclock potential, though not the best. It also tends to be quieter, but wait for reviews.
>>
>>339377374
I wouldn't get the 970 now, either get the 980TI or wait until it's more affordable, but getting a 970 NOW sounds like a dumb idea.
>>
File: 1460764979449.png (151KB, 474x311px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1460764979449.png
151KB, 474x311px
>"Wow $599 for a 1080 thats an amazing price!"
>Comes to UK
>It's £630 (almost $1000)

Fuck you nvidia
>>
>>339372007
Why buy this year when its going to be obsolete next year anyway.
>>
>>339382307
>$1700 to build a gaming PC

If you're a fucking retard to who just buys the most expensive hardware because "highest price means best hardware".

Anyone buying multiple 1080s for SLI is a fucking moron.
>>
>>339372007
evga every time retard. cmon now
>>
>>339383125
>worst 970 and 980ti builds
>every time

EVGA has been pumping out shit since the 700 series.
>>
>>339383012
why is this? its not like we are brazil or some 3rd world slav country why do they put the prices up so much
>>
File: 980ti 1070 1080.webm (465KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
980ti 1070 1080.webm
465KB, 1920x1080px
1080 vs 980 ti ~ 15% better
1070 vs 980 ti ~ 10% worse

>people spending $700 for barely faster 980ti
>
>>
>>339383238
I have no idea, taxes?

The 1070 is probably going to be £400 too. I was gonna import but then customs would fuck us. Some of the cards are bordering £590-600 at their cheapest. It's insane.
>>
>>339383238
>>339383012
Its called VAT you fucking retard. Learn your own country's import tax. These are usually around 15-30% depending on European countries.

Brazil niggers have it much higher like 100% or so on some shits
>>
>>339382878
What the fuck, duck? I like having small cube instead of huge tower. I don't need 10 HDDs, it's all packed neatly and the whole box is full of ventilation holes.

Only downside is that I can't have videocards longer than 210 mm.
>>
>>339379715
not the same anon but what are you talking about famalamadingdong, he said "bought 970 for $300, 1070 is $70 more".
interpreting that as the 1070 is $370 completely understandable
>>
File: 1462036624954.jpg (45KB, 550x397px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1462036624954.jpg
45KB, 550x397px
>mfw I bought a 980 about 3 months ago
>>
>>339383238
Are you retarded?
For third world shitholes they take the price down so that they can actually make sales.
>>
>>339383254
1080 OC hasn't been tested yet as all the sample cards nvidia handed out are locked. That's also the "founder's edition" which is nvidia's new way to say "reference card".
>>
>>339379837
see >>339383364
>>
>>339383254
1080 can do 4k at >60fps but also when the custom PCB version come out you'll see some huge OC since right now the only reason we can't OC more is because the VRMs are at their limit. Then we'll also have cleaner power through 2-8pin. We'll see some high, safe ocs and some nasty framerates.
>>
File: mpv29.jpg (454KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
mpv29.jpg
454KB, 1920x1080px
>>339383437
The 1080 OC is right on the line, the mythical 2.1Ghz is something that no reviewers are seeing right now.
>>
>>339372007
AMD all the way baby

nvidia are the evil jews
>>
I'm 6 generations behind now. Is there any reason for me to replace my graphic card when I only play old games anyway?
>>
When's the standard (non-fouinders) one coming out?
I can't find a solid answer for the 1080 or the 1070.
>>
>>339383639
>AMD
>can't even live up to their gimmicks (DX12 and 4k resolution, we swear we do it better)
>causes house fires

How about instead of buying budget gpu garbage, you get a card with some value.
>>
>>339383715
Why would you ask a question you already know the answer to? I'm not sure who it could bait.
>>
>>339383731
Later in June. It was a paper launch after all.

The 1070 might be even later in June or July.
>>
>>339383731
It's the same answer you'll get for a 970 vs a 980(ti).

The higher end cards are a better value, but more expensive.
>>
>>339383749
>nvidia
>value

the jokes write themselves
>>
Really not wise to get a 1080 now

AMD Vega could be out by October, forcing Nvidia to release the 1080 Ti early & price cut the 1080
Plus 1080 is only really good at super high clocks, so wait for the liquid cooled variants which are coming soon, 2.5ghz 1080 would be quite nice
>>
>>339375778
Then why the fuck did you come post in this thread?
>>
>>339383802
I'm wondering if there is something I might be missing. I doubt it but who knows?
>>
AMD has consistently worse drivers than nvidia, brand loyalty for AMD makes absolutely no sense.
>>
Why does everyone shit on EVGA that I talk to? Is it just because they happened to buy a different brand and they needed to one up me?

Every time I talk to anyone else with a 970 on TeamSpeak or Steam and I tell them it's EVGA they're just like "Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmya shoulda got a [whatever exact brand they have] because [some retarded problem that has never happened to me despite owning the GPU for months and having owned an EVGA prior]"

This happened with someone who owned an MSI, and another who owned an ASUS. I bet if they talked to each other, the same exchange would happen.

Like, nigga, stop nitpicking about your almost identical hardware with a different cooler attached.
>>
>>339383906
>wait
>wait
>wait
>>
>>339381846
Who actually buys the most expensive?

Mid line ones always can max every game, and often $200+ cheaper
>>
>>339383369

>spending hundreds of dollars without proper research
>>
bought the evga 1080 founders, depending on how hot it runs in my build, I may use the step up program in the future.
>>
>>339383906
I doubt it will hit 2.5 at all. The problem people are seeing with custom 1080 are voltage limitation rather than thermal limitation(which was the case with Founders Edition).

I doubt we'll see 2.1 or 2.2 Ghz max.
>>
>>339383887
>runs cooler
>runs quieter
>overall superior gpus to AMD "competitor cards"

They cost more for a reason. That reason is that they're not complete garbage sold to retards at a "value price".

Everything AMD makes is trash.
>>
>>339383906
WAIT! WAIT! DON'T BUY ALWAYS WAIT!
>>
File: deathcool.png (358KB, 361x416px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
deathcool.png
358KB, 361x416px
>not getting pny
>>
How expensive is it for a company to invest in graphics hardware research? This industry is in dire need of competition.
>>
>>339384037
Their gpu builds suck. They're noisy and hot, and they don't make up for it with OC potential.

Back in the 600 series, they were the best, but they have not kept up.
>>
>>339383558
People got to 2.1 but they had to pull power out of the memory.
>>
>>339384110
Are you okay?
>>
>>339383906
>AMD Vega could be out by October, forcing Nvidia to release the 1080 Ti early & price cut the 1080
Only if it is out by October, and only if it's competitive enough for them to release early and drop the price significantly.
>>
>Still not really 4k ready

What's the point?

The 980ti can max every game except Ark at like 100+fps, and likely will for years to come.
The 1080 still drops below 60fps on most modern games in 4k.

Its a card that doesn't need to exist. Just give it a few years for a card that can really do 4k before you go past a 980ti
>>
>>339384181
you don't have enough money.
theres enough competition.
i don't want to deal even more drivers
>>
>>339384076
I fell for the 970 meme.
>don't buy the 970 goy, it only has 3.5 gb ram, better buy the much better 980 goy, its cheap and has full 4 gb ram!
>>
>bought asus 960 4GB STRIX
>no regret

I'm a poor nigga who wonky play weeb games anyway
>>
>>339384218
lolwhat
>>
>>339384264
You don't buy a 980, you stupid fuck. You buy the 980ti.
>>
>>339380673
This
>>
>>339384218
>They're noisy and hot
Not the 760 and 970. I can't hear it at all most of the time, and hear a tiny faint noise when it's the middle of summer in Florida (right now) with my faster custom fan speed.

Now my 9600 GSO, that was a fucking airplane, but that was an old blower in a poorly cooled prebuilt that was blanked in dust constantly.
>>
>>339384346
They run hot.
The fans get loud as fuck.
They're notorious for coil whine.
They don't have better OC than other builds.
>>
>>339383927
because 9XX fags will know that beyond the 12gb of vram, they are almost the same, even better because they are non reference.
And im seing 970 fags seeing arranged charts to show that the card is twice as fast, wich is not plain thruth, there is a driver play here too.

No one replied, not even baits, so i kept the thread rolling.

Still, this new cards just rise the celling a little more, 40% in non reference ocd cards at most in real conditions, its not that impresive.

Still.. people will buy reference 10xx despite the fact they power trottle alot.
>>
>>339384264
It wasn't a meme, it was a legitimate issue.
It was an issue with the first release.
>>
can we expect the 980ti to outperform the 1070? should i get a 980ti now or wait to get the 1080/1070. budget PC anon here
>>
>>339382990
>Gigabyte is shit for overclock.
care to elaborate or are you just retarded
>>
>>339383715
Superdampling old games 4k looks cool.
>>
>>339384565
Gigabyte locks voltage.
>>
>>339384474
>The fans get loud as fuck.
They don't

>They're notorious for coil whine.
It's funny when I first heard this, I had to Google what it even means because I was trying to see if I could ever figure out what the hell it even is I'm supposed to pretend I can hear.

Now I'm not gonna be a total faggot here, if these are common EVGA problems, I'm not ruling it out. But it certainly isn't for every single one, as I've owned a 760 and a 970 as mentioned above.
>>
>>339384553
1070 is on par with Titan X
>>
File: HHFLEX.jpg (42KB, 620x468px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
HHFLEX.jpg
42KB, 620x468px
So uh...is there actually a reason to get a 1080?

Upcoming game-wise, I mean.
>>
>>339384713
Depends on your display.
>>
>>339381846
Because not everyone can afford to buy the best hardware. And the 70-50 of the series are cheaper, better and more power-efficient versions of 80 of an older series. For example, you can buy the huge, bulky and power hungry 280, or you can instead get a 650 that has basically the same performance (don't quote me on that, I don't know the details), but is built with new technology, allowing it to be much smaller and power efficient.
>>
>>339384553

with new driver updates, the 1070 will outperform the 980ti.

the 1070 already outperforms the 980ti on a lot of games.

http://www.pcgamer.com/geforce-gtx-1070-performance-preview/?3
>>
>>339384105
good goy, spread the word.

#AMDsuxballs
#memeworks
>>
>>339384713
With how much time is put into optimization these days, it will let you play upcoming games at 1080p 60 FPS and max settings.
>>
>>339384713
only for VR or 4k
>>
>>339372347
And then wait 3 to 6 months after a game launches for a patch or new drivers that makes it playable while you blame everyone but AMD
>>
>>339381846
>Why do car manufacturers release powerful and weak cars each year? Why not just release one car?
>>
>>339384929
>1080
>4k ready
;^)
>>
>>339384931
The same dance every year.
>>
>visit forums for a game
>its flooded by AMD users blaming devs for shitty AMD performance
>on literally every game released for the past 8 years
>>
File: Koala.jpg (763KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
Koala.jpg
763KB, 1024x768px
Wait for 5080, it's only 5 years from now, I can't understand all this rushing...I mean, what are you...a GAMER?
Wrong board faggot.
>>
>>339385251
neck yourself my man
>>
>>339384994
If my 970 could play MGSV and Alien Isolation at 4k 60 fps it should be fine
>>
>>339383429
Only in stuff that is manufactured locally, like video-game disks. This literally doesn't happen anywhere else.

Picrelated, that's 590USD. 1100USD before the war economy.
>>
>>339384994
>1080p upscaled to 4k
>they think it's actual 4k gaming

;^)
>>
>>339384713
I currently have a 7950 which is dying. I'm planning on buying a 1440p Ultrawide display, so I need something witha little umf.
>>
>>339385317
>I could play the two most optimized games of this generation fine
>therefore its 4k ready

OK...

I get 300fps in minecraft so I should run out and buy a 120hz monitor.
>>
>>339384235
No
>>
>>339385317

First, no you can't. 1440p at best. I have a 970 and MGS5 and Alien Isolation.

Second, those are literally the best running games ever created in the history of gaming. I doubt most games will get that much attention to optimization.
>>
>>339385409
so 1440p or ultrawide?
>>
>>339384903
How much is AMD paying you to shill in 1080 threads while polaris is around the corner?
>>
File: 1413146709628.png (3KB, 147x130px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1413146709628.png
3KB, 147x130px
>rma'd my gpu to EVGA
>they received it last friday but haven't sent anything back yet
>>
File: 1437548981713.gif (2MB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1437548981713.gif
2MB, 500x281px
>>339377374
>nvidia
>price drops
>>
I don't even buy Nvidia but you're a fool if you don't wait for the EVGA model.
>>
>4k Gaming

Whats the point? With textures as low res as they are, you get nothing from increasing the resolution, except not needing as high anti aliasing, but youre already pumping out so much power its redundant
>>
>>339384037
They have issues with cooling fan failures
>>
asus are shit
gigabyte or msi are decent
>>
>>339381409
The wait is always tiny.
>>
>>339385568
DON'T LAUGH
>>
>>339385532
I guess I got my terminology wrong. i mean the 3440 x 1440 ultrawides.
>>
How do you deal with the fucked up hud and super small text you get at 1440p downscaled?
>>
>release marginally better hardware
>release drivers that nerf previous series cards
>cheaper than previous lines

i await an upgrade as well , but nvidia just keeps swindling and jewing around.

currently own a 660.. so no amd fanboyism bullshit
>>
>>339385757
play games at 1080p
>>
>>339385584
>EVGA
>not buying MSI
>>
>>339385685
a couple of weeks is tiny. A year is not.
>>
>>339385757
Downscaling really sucks. It just fucks too much of the UI up. I gave up even trying any more.

Would be nice if developers would always have a resolution scale slider, then we get the benefits without bothering the UI.
>>
>>339385304
No u.

I'd like to smear Vegemite all over your candy ass and lick it all off and then tongue kiss you until your dick gets rock hard, then I'd go down on you really good until you cum in my mouth...you turned me on, fuck you...
>>
>>339385856
Why should I buy MSI instead of EVGA?
>>
>>339385702
seriously, go look at prices for 700 series cards. literally two generations behind and 780ti still sells for the price of a 1070
>>
>>339385757
That's what happens when you downscale dude. Most games don't have scalable UI.
>>
>>339385625
Medium to distant details clarity. You will understand when you try it. But if you don't have 20/20 vision you're SOL
>>
>>339386031
Too haram, sorry.
>>
>>339381409
No this is ALWAYS the case.

When the 980ti it was "wait for the Fury X, it will beat the ti and cost less". Fury X came out, had to have a watercooler because it was the only way they could get the power close to that of the 980ti without it igniting. It ended up being the same price, and over all it barely beat out the 970.
>>
File: Untitled.jpg (39KB, 461x287px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
Untitled.jpg
39KB, 461x287px
>>339385685
I've been waiting for a while

Pascal is the point I upgrade
>>
>>339386059
I'm expressing obvious denial as a way of agreeing with your post. Perhaps I should have included an image of a crying frog.
>>
>>339386163
Basically being able to play games with your face placed 2cm from the screen
>>
>>339386270
Then wait til November and just get the 1080ti.
>>
>>339383012
>Islamic country complaining about the price of technology
Pretty sure rendering 3D graphics is haram.
>>
>>339386361
or maybe I'll get the 1070 for half the price this summer
>>
>>339382990
This

>Gigabyte
Anything above stock clock shits itself. My 660 had a voltage issue and crashed constantly. They never admitted it or replaced it, but added a new version of the card with fixed voltage to the market a month later

>Asus
Coil whine city. They don't give two shits about well designed headsinks

>MSI
Never had a single fucking problem with them
>>
>>339386445
Only if the card lacks onboard prophet detection and censorship capabilities.
>>
>>339386460
That's also an option. I was just saying that if you have the money to get the 1080, then just pay the $50 more and get the 1080ti when it comes out.
>>
>>339386270
>i5 3470

I never laughed so hard in my entire life AHAHAHAHAHAH!
>>
File: 1464387902257.jpg (33KB, 620x348px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1464387902257.jpg
33KB, 620x348px
>Polaris runs new games like Doom at 2k/144 fps.
>Polaris costs $250
>mfw people still buy overpriced Nvida cards.
>>
File: 645646.jpg (6KB, 261x193px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
645646.jpg
6KB, 261x193px
>Liquid cooled Pascal Titan with HBM2/3840 CUDA cores at 2ghz

Waiting for this
Will make 4K gaming smooth as hell
>>
>>339386587
what's wrong with it?
>>
>>339386635
Maybe they want to be able to render new games that aren't shit?
>>
>>339386635
My face that people actually believe AMD's lies. You'll always have "but on paper it outperforms blah".
>>
>>339385484
yes I do. Turn off AA it does nothing for 4k
>>
>>339383369
>Spending tons of money without reading about a full gpu architecture change months away seems legit

Do you get all your news from /v/ and /g/?
>>
Should a r9 280x run witcher 3 max settings at 60 fps steady?


Cause it doesn't for me.
>>
>>339386059
nvidia knows that if they price drop their old card, it will kill the sales of their newest cards.

Also worth consideration, nvidia stops manufacturing their old cards once they get a couple generations ahead. So the prices of old cards skyrockets as retailers attempt to brutally dry fuck people who need the older cards for SLI.
>>
>>339386795
>AA is useless at 4K meme

Spot the person who doesn't play at 4K
>>
>>339386032
Higher OC potential due to better parts used for cooling and power draw
>>
>finally going to build a pc after putting it off for forever
>Interested in only gaming at 1440p

Would a 1070 allow me to do high/ultra settings at 60 at that resolution? Or should I just go 1080?
>>
>>339386635
>144fps

You don't need 144fps to use a 144hz monitor, dofus.

also reminder that the GTX 1080 is just a 1/3 (20SM) of the full Pascal chipset (60SM).
>>
>>339386912
Which also makes it good for resale since I'll be able to sell my 980ti and get back 75% of the money I paid and just get a 1080ti.
>>
>>339387001
>just go 1080
Yes
>>
>>339387001
Polaris or 1070 will be fine at 1440p
>>
>>339386908
no
i get 50fps even with gameworks disabled and shadows on medium
>>
>>339387001
Should be able to with most games. I never bother with 1440p, or rarely bother. I go for HD mods instead.
>>
File: 1464367690862.jpg (206KB, 1200x900px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1464367690862.jpg
206KB, 1200x900px
>>339372347
>>
>>339387105
>AMD
>ever

Really, fuck off. AMD has never, NEVER, had a leg up on nvidia going on 4 generations of cards.

Then you get to take a look at the rest of their line up: shit cpus, shit mobos.

Everything AMD makes is fucking garbage.
>>
>>339386694
Nothing. Some people just don't understand what price/performance ratio means and buy the most expensive shit because it's the ''best''.
>>
>>339387363
But that's wrong you retarded nvidia shill
>>
>>339378014
>1070
>for $370

You people have no idea how good you have it. The fucking 1070 will cost ~460€ in germany. That is $512 for the same fucking product, because the fucking jews in the EU need to tax US products to strengthen the EU market. And yes, they assume there is a EU manufacturer for PC hardware that can compete with the US.
>>
>>339387464
Name one generation of gpus where AMD beat nvidia for quality and performance.

Name one generation where AMD beat nvidia for driver quality.

Name one generation with AMD beat nvidia for power efficiency.

Name one generation where AMD beat nvidia for gpu temps under load.

Name one generation where AMD beat nvidia for gpu noise under load.

Name one, faggot.
>>
>>339387130
So as someone who wants to run witcher 3 max 60 fps, what should I upgrade to from an r9 280x?
>>
>>339387464
It's not wrong. nVidia has always had more of a market share than AMD. And it's a lead by a WIDE margin. AMD has like 21% with nVidia having 79% of the market.
>>
>>339387534
You eurofags need to get the fuck out of the EU. Biggest kike money haul in existence.
>>
>>339387664
Name one generation of gpus where AMD beat nvidia for quality and performance. - Fermi

Name one generation where AMD beat nvidia for driver quality. - Recently with the 600-700 Cards getting gimped, 7870's beating 780 Ti's, fucking what

Name one generation with AMD beat nvidia for power efficiency. - Fermi

Name one generation where AMD beat nvidia for gpu temps under load. - Fermi

Name one generation where AMD beat nvidia for gpu noise under load. - Fermi
>>
>>339386784
every time a game comes out they flood the official forums for that game with cries of "PLEASE OPTIMISE FOR AMD CPU AND GPUs!" Why do they keep falling for this?
>>
Am I the only one completely fine with the amount of detail that 1080p can display? I mean, it's a fucking lot of detail.
Jeez.
>>
>>339387769
Just checked the gtx1080. It literally costs $1000 if I bought it here in germany.
>>
>>339387769
Don't worry when Trump gets in he will turn a blind eye to Putin & Russia will invade EU
>>
>>339387726
980, 980ti (Can also use Hairworks), 1070, 1080. I'm assuming 1070 and 1080 will also be able to use Hairworks without killing the FPS. It's gotten a little better, but is still a hit to performance.
>>
>>339387835
>goes all the way back to the 400 series
>relevant

Exactly, faggot. Now shut the fuck up.
>>
>>339387769
Yuros will vote nannystate and taxes all by themselves, they'd do it anyway without EU.
>>
>>339387884
I must admit though, a new nVidia driver every fucking AAA game that comes can be pretty annoying.
>>
>>339388043
Yeah look at Switzerland
UK leaving the EU will ironically just lead to more non white immigration as it will be harder to pour the Poles in
>>
>>339372007
MSI cus muh black/red
>>
>>339372007
EVGA > MSI > Gigabyte/ASUS (in terms of warranty/quality of parts/etc)

Gigabyte/EVGA > MSI > ASUS (in terms of overclock from factory and custom PCBs)

ASUS > Gigabyte > MSI/EVGA (in terms of the largest must unnecessarily huge cooler that takes up an annoyingly large amount of space in your case for no reason).

I'm personally waiting for the FTW from EVGA. Gonna stick my dick in the custom BIOS.
>>
>>339388423
>Gigabyte
>most superior for OC

Except that's wrong, faggot. Gigabyte locks up a ton of OC shit because their cards can't handle OC.

If you want OC, go with EVGA if you're using a liquid cooling system, otherwise go with MSI.
>>
File: 1386774018697.png (124KB, 520x466px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1386774018697.png
124KB, 520x466px
>>339385409
>falling for the 1440p meme

It's literally something that exists to make you spend money before you spend it all again on 4k displays in a year or so.

http://www.amazon.com/Acer-Predator-XB271HU-27-inch-Widescreen/dp/B0173PEX20

>The only decent 1440 display is 700 dollaroos

>Actually wanting an ultrawide instead because autism
Kill yourself
>>
File: Holeup.jpg (55KB, 480x720px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
Holeup.jpg
55KB, 480x720px
>>339388627
Gigabyte has the highest from factory stable overclocks in the business. I personally don't like them. They also have the highest TDP air cooler on the market, but it sounds like a banshee so I'm not a fan.

EVGA forever.
>>
>>339387901
Once you go 1440p you will never go back. The leap from 1080 to 1440 is massive. 1440 to 2160 not as noticeable in motion but massively more demanding on a cpu
>>
>>339386565
>tfw your GTX 1180 needs to face mecca or the warranty is void.
>>
>>339388829
>highest from factory
>with everything locked the fuck up

If you're going to OC, do it yourself.
>>
>>339388768
>not getting glorious 21:9 like
http://www.amazon.com/Curved-3440x1440-G-SYNC-Gaming-Monitor/dp/B01C83BE6U
http://www.amazon.com/Acer-Predator-UltraWide-Widescreen-X34/dp/B016GNX4SE
http://www.amazon.com/Dell-UltraSharp-34-Inch-LED-Lit-Monitor/dp/B00PXYRMPE
>>
>>339372007

EVGA Hybrid for 2GHZ Overclocks.
>>
>>339388863
>tfw instead of buying a halal 1180, you bought an infidel AMD which is a literal pillar of fire.
>>
>>339388768
1440p has been around long before 4K
Also buying any monitor atm is pointless because of HDR being around the corner
>>
>>339388986
>21:9
>buying a meme ratio

Enjoy no software supporting that scale in like a year.

Make sure you buy a curved display with 3D while you're at it, goy!
>>
>>339388627
Even without using liquid cooling they fixed their ACX problems with 2.0 and are quite good now. They can get loud though.
>>
>>339387363
O I am laffin

Remember how great the 780 Ti was when it came out? I remember it being the "god" card for a while like the 980 Ti was this past gen. With the latest drivers for both cards, the 290x beats it or matches it in almost every benchmark, be it 3DMark or actual in-game performance when it was the exact opposite by a fair margin when both cards first released. The 290x even launched before the 780 Ti. At launch, the 780 Ti scored 4906 in Firestrike Extreme and with the latest drivers it now pulls 4774. The 290x at launch managed 4676 and it now scores 5061 (!!!). I bet a year or two from now you'll see the 390x outperforming the 980 Ti, how the fuck can anyone deny that Nvidia is shitting all over older cards with every single WHQL release they put out just so they can sell more new cards?

Pic related, benches done recently with the latest drivers from both vendors. The story was different when these cards first launched but now the 3xx series cards are sweeping the 9xx cards at every price point except for the very high end which is a tiny percentage of the market anyways. Notice the 390 handily beating the 970 even though it only traded blows with it or was beaten by it when it first launched.

AMD cards age like fine wine, Nvidia cards like milk. I'll be laughing at the Nvidiots when Mankind Divided comes out and AMD crushes everything pre-Pascal.

Nvidia is a meme, people buy their shitty hardware for the same reason they buy Macbooks and Beats headphones.
>>
What the fuck. I'm in the market for a new GPU and have money to spend, but I don't know what I should even go for because there's always "XX IS RIGHT AROUND THE CORNER WHICH RESULT IN YY."
>>
>>339388768
>sister argues 4k doesn't look any better than 1080
>proves it by showing me 4k screen shots on her 1080p display.

building her PC and getting her into PC gaming was a mistake
>>
>>339389138
The problem with buying anything computer related is that something is "always around the corner". Why get the 1080 when the 1080ti is out in a few months. Before that was why get the 980ti when a whole new chipset is going to drop in 6 months.
>>
>>339380709
Computex webcast literally happens tomorrow at 7pm. You're an idiot.
>>
>>339388908
Nvidia Gigabyte cards aren't voltages locked.

The Gigabyte G1 Gaming series are the best Nvidia cards you can buy.
>>
>>339389569
Just buy the 1070/80.

AMD cards take a year or two to get decent anyway.
>>
>>339389247
I got mine in January 2015 at CES for 700 bucks and every game I play supports it perfectly except Overwatch (some shit about it being unfair to 16:9 gaymurs the devs said)

Stay mad poorfag. I'll upgrade to a 32" 4k 16:9 monitor when HDR 10bit displays come out. (Hopefully OLED). Hopefully they'll be under 2,000US at launch.
>>
File: 1463268340735.jpg (5KB, 364x138px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1463268340735.jpg
5KB, 364x138px
>>339380917
>>339381770

Don't forget to check the expiry date on that extinguisher you keep at the side of your desk.
>>
>>339389492
Yes get a card that will finally give you game support a year after the game has come out and you've moved on.

AMD cuck logic. Sure I don't play GTA V anymore, but if I did it would run a whole lot better now than when the game was actually relevant.
>>
>>339389492
>O I am laffin
>780ti god card

I am laffin too. The 700 series was all trash; anyone who grabbed a 700 series instead of a 680ti was a fucking retard.

The 980ti has proven itself all through this gen of gpus.

AMD is fucking trash.

>AMD cards age like fine wine

I know my aged wine catches fire every now and then. Spicy!
>>
>>339389858
>980ti without a 4790k
Travesty.
I really want to try a gimmicky UW monitor for Stronghold though.
>>
>>339389858
take that i7 to a little more, and you have computer for like 3 more years before the celling gets too high.
of go for a 4790k and take it to 4.6ghz and are done for more years in that regard.
>>
How much dedotated ram does the gtx 1080 have
>>
File: 0yKZ3tj.jpg (60KB, 552x661px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
0yKZ3tj.jpg
60KB, 552x661px
HBM2 WILL FIX EVERYTHING FUCK YOU V
>>
>>339389986
*680/660ti
>>
>>339390343
About 10 Gigoobots of roms.
>>
>>339390385
I don't know about AMD but HBM2 will make wonders for Nvidia, they cards are severely bandwidth starved.
>>
File: 980ti.gif (23KB, 400x494px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
980ti.gif
23KB, 400x494px
>>339389858
3770k is really no different and has more headroom than devils canyon. Plus anyone who upgrades for CPU more often than 4 years is a moron. I'm waiting for Kaby Lake
>>339390320
Are you a moron? Speccy uses default clock values no matter what. My 3770k is running 104.4 BLK x 42 multiplier rock solid 24/7 under water
>>
>>339388029
I'm an Nvidia user and AMD sucks, but holy shit those goalposts just broke the sound barrier
>>
>>339390489
The sandbox meme is finally dying thanks to FO4s flop. Nobody needs 384+bit bandwidth cards anymore. HBM is and always was a meme.
>>
>>339389247
Most modern software has scalable and customizable uis.
>>
>>339389986
>680 ti
>literally non-existent card

Do you even know the company you're paid to be shilling for? Embarrassing
>>
>>339390385
>HBM2 WILL FIX EVERYTHING
Except TDP
>tfw 1080 pulls under 280 on load
Nvidia jew magic is wonderful.
>>
>>339389858
nigga that's a bitchin setup
>>
File: 1447698277893.gif (2MB, 421x384px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1447698277893.gif
2MB, 421x384px
>>339375778
>have three titan X
>can max out everything in the universe
>came here to jerk off to my PC specs
>>
You guys are all nvidia shills. Current cards are fine.

-------------------------------------------------
Intel 6700K
64 gb's of Corsair 1800 DDR2
3 nvidia 670m's in tri-sli
xbox 360 power brick
>>
File: aFXf6.jpg (23KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
aFXf6.jpg
23KB, 480x480px
>>339389858
>calls others poor
>can only afford one monitor

Sorry, can't hear you over my 3 displays and my HD800s block out the rest.

Enjoy wasting money, though.
>>
File: YouGigantic.gif (2MB, 320x320px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
YouGigantic.gif
2MB, 320x320px
>>339390823
Thanks boss
>>
>>339390870
>charts shown are bullshit
>card is actually equal to a 780TI on the same conditions
>thread is made by pajeet
>retards go crazy because new product
>use threads like this to ask if they need to upgrade like this is some kind of tech forum

What would you do?
>>
>>339390654
I didn't set a goalposts, I just asked him to name a generation of gpus.

The best he could do was go all the way back to the 400 series. My point was proven.

>>339390719
See:>>339390447

There's no edit option, and the point still stands. If you actually have a point to make, then make it; otherwise, shut the fuck up.
>>
File: Oculus.jpg (960KB, 1173x1438px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
Oculus.jpg
960KB, 1173x1438px
>>339391106
The ones on the right are Fostex TH-900 and on the left are HD700s. I have HD800s in my listening room, they are overkill for gaymen.

Multi-monitor gaming is a meme. Enjoy your borders.

I wonder when VorpX will add Oculus support for Overwatch
>>
>>339391106
>HD800
nice poverty cans.
>>
File: Doomguy2.jpg (476KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
Doomguy2.jpg
476KB, 800x800px
>>339383012
>1080 is €800 ($890) here
DUDE TAXES LMAO
>>
>>339391256
You said "never" 5 years ago is hardly "never".
>>
>>339391386
Getting the Rift over the Vive.

Enjoy FB taking even more data and gearing shit towards you. Especially when the Rift doesn't do as well as hoped and they need to recuperate the billions they spent buying it and start giving you commercials.
>>
File: 84871200488.jpg (27KB, 408x369px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
84871200488.jpg
27KB, 408x369px
>>339391193
Still jerk off to my i7-5930K and Titan X 3-way SLi
>>
>>339383012
>GTX 1080 price is announced
>$600
>Wow, I'm sure to get it as $600 is ~2500 zł in Poland
>Polish price is announced
>3600 zł

Fuck you Nvidia.
>>
>>339391604
Not him, but a simple rule on a firewall solves that pretty easy.
>>
>>339391386
>Fostex TH-900
25 ohms

>HD700
kek

>claims to own hd800s as well
ok pal

>Occulus
Are you capable of spending money on ANYTHING good?

>>339391390
That's what everyone who's poor and mad says
>>
File: hqdefault.jpg (12KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
hqdefault.jpg
12KB, 480x360px
>>339391660
Not 3 but
i have a fat titanX too
>>
>>339392057
Do you like it?
>>
>>339391490
Look! An AMD shill in nvidia clothing!

My point was proven. AMD has no relevant glory moments for any of their hardware. They're going on 3 generations of cards that can't compete; and when they claim that they can compete under super specific conditions (DX12, we swear guys), they still fuck it up.
>>
File: Muh_VIVE.jpg (441KB, 1413x1080px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
Muh_VIVE.jpg
441KB, 1413x1080px
>>339391604
I have the VIVE too, it is inferior. The controllers are neat but the Touch controllers for Oculus are superior and with the second Oculus sensor roomscale is greater

I HATE the wire harness on my Vive, it is so fucking annoying, and the whole setup isn't as comfy as Oculus and the lenses aren't as good at hiding the screendooring

I guess if you NEED a complete experience now (when there are no games for either) then the Vive is currently more complete, but it is overall an inferior product.

Plus VorpX works better in Oculus CV1 than it does on my Vive.
>>
>>339392653
>>339391604
>>339391386
>buying any of this "VR" trash

You're paying out the ass for a monitor strapped to your face.

Any worthwhile VR is a good 5-10 years away. This is not a technology that you want to jump on from its outset; you fucking retards.
>>
File: gpu.jpg (106KB, 474x625px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
gpu.jpg
106KB, 474x625px
>>339392174
Once you control the temps, you can do whatever you want.
I have it OCd because i have almost no drops in games, this is the most basic OC you can make, if you want to go further, better go for waterblocks.
How are yours?
I know asking about OC a 3way sli is retarded, but still.
>>
Man remember when AMD fags were all like

>DX12 IS GONNA TURN IT AROUND! J-JUST YOU WAIT, MY CARD IS GOING TO BE TWICE AS FAST! DX12! DX12! DX12!

And then nothing fucking happened? Good times.
>>
>>339392864
They are both extremely good and totally suck you into the games after about 5-10 minutes in a game. The only part that "isn't here" is the part where we lack a breadth of games faggot.

It is incredible (especially the oculus which is so comfy you forget you're wearing it). The 3D is beyond flawless and I'm glad we finally have a device that makes 3D useful & adds something to a game rather than a gimmick. The addition of real depth and the perfect 1:1 head tracking really make it great. I'd go so far as to say the headtracking is so accurate it can replace your mouse for aiming in a competitive shooter.
>>
>>339393074
That's the way it is with AMD Cucks, the ability to make their card better, or AMD better is perpetually around the corner.
>>
>shilling for and defending multi million dollar companies that give no shits about you
>wanting a monopoly
You have to be over 18 to post on this board
>>
>>339372160
Why?
>>
I don't really understand this. Nvidia is a publicly traded company. So they made this new gpu gtx 1080. But if you buy the gpu then it's made by gigabyte, asus or msi as OP said. So what the fuck exactly does nvidia do?

Yeah I'm a normalfag that just updates his gpu every 3 years. Own 970 at the moment
>>
>>339393960
Nvidia designs the reference PCB which board manufacturers reverse engineer. Nvidia designs the GPU (the actual chip on the board) and the instruction set, prints them, and then licenses out the right to print and modify the reference designs to certified manufacturers like MSI/Gigabyte/EVGA/etc
>>
>>339393960
They engineer and make their own reference GPUs and then sell manufacturer licenses to other companies
>>
>>339394104

That's all they fucking do? Sounds like their profits would be fucking minimal but of course I don't know shit.

So you have a billion dollar company that announces one new super gpu every 3 years? That's it?
>>
>>339372007
When the fuck can we buy the non-reference cards?
>>
>>339394265
How so? The manufacturers are free to order reference GPUs and boards (which have extremely low margins) or make their own board, bios and modify the instructons for the GPU and make a considerable profit
>>
>>339372347
>HURR DURR WAIT
no fuck off
>>
>>339394265
SHUT IT DOWN.

Yes. its like that, they develop chips with a better "cost effective" parts bewteen 3 years.
>>
anyone have a comparison? I want to know how much better the 1070 and 1080 are to the 970
>>
File: im happy and angry.png (167KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
im happy and angry.png
167KB, 500x375px
>tfw recently bought an r9 380x
>tfw it was 220 americoon dollhairs
>tfw i dont give a shit about nvidia or owning a 600 dollar state of the art card

feels alright, man, i wish i gave a damn about more strictly contemporary hardware, but why should i?
>>
>>339372007
EVGA YOU STUPID IDIOT!
>>
Where are you guys getting the non-reference card prices/specs?

Newegg has nothing.
>>
i'mma wait to save up. I'd like a new graphics card and a VR headset if it can be helped. Probably can't be though i constantly yoyo around 400 - 600 dollars.
>>
>>339376591
holy shit i've listen that video like bioshock intro.
>>
>>339394816
Most of the charts are fucked up and biased by newest novidya drivers, also dont show clocks.

There wont be any fair comparison, because everyone upgraded their drivers and use all the jewvidia bloatware.
Some charts show the 780TI 3gb higher than both 1080 and 1070, and off course, below the 980TI and the titanX. but some will show the 1080 like novidya oficial charts.
>>
>>339392924
I don't OC but still love them. Got them to sit around 28C while idle (browsing web and watching movies included) and about 78C while gaming at 4K.
>>
>>339395073
Related to this.

What's the difference between reference card, and not reference cards?
Which is better? And how?
>>
Last EVGA product I got
>460GTX
>Cooling fan fails after 6 months
>it's 3' degrees F outside.
>Set PC outside.
>crack open window and run cables through.
>overclock the fuck out of it.
>temps locked at 28' C
>>
File: 1412511511969.jpg (212KB, 1680x988px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1412511511969.jpg
212KB, 1680x988px
>>339395347
Tell me you at least tested Space engine and saw shit like this at 4k.
>im still at 1080.
I need a new screen soon.
>>
>>339395783
I haven't but if it's free I'll go grab it right now.
>>
>>339376591
Interesting. I wonder if automated construction will lower their prices by eliminating the cost to pay employee's and such even by just a little bit.
>>
>>339395613
is that bad?
>>
>tfw fell for the freesync meme
if vega is shit ill just get a 1070/1080 during black friday/cyber monday
>>
>>339393074
But why don't they learn?! They fooled me for only 2 cards then I never went back.
>>
File: 1412508173484.jpg (222KB, 1920x1155px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1412508173484.jpg
222KB, 1920x1155px
>>339396168
http://en.spaceengine.org/
yes, its free and you can download it from the creators page.
its a lone cheeky breeky wizzard.
>he alone made a prodecual generated space able to reproduce the virgo supercluster
Its not 100% accurate ouside the know starts, but its actually pretty good.

It has 1 flaw, and its the worst shit ever, after some time, something fucks up, and the game just crash, so dont worry with that, happens after minutes of visiting random planets.

But still is a good for comfy space and good screenshots.
>>
File: CantStumpWontStump.jpg (93KB, 1017x739px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
CantStumpWontStump.jpg
93KB, 1017x739px
>>339396301
>if vega is shit ill just get a 1070/1080 during black friday/cyber monday
VEGA isn't out until late 2017. AMD said there won't be a high tier GPU out this fiscal year (which ends in April of 2017). They'll only have polaris (mid tier) shit until then.

So get back in the locker AMDcuck, don't come out until next year
>>
>>339396450
Nice, downloading now.
>>
>>339396219
every time I buy a card and look up the reviews and people are still reporting fan failures to this day. Never had a single MSI card fail.
>>
>>339396493
>AMD said there won't be a high tier GPU out this fiscal year (which ends in April of 2017). They'll only have polaris (mid tier) shit until then.
This can't be true. They are asking to be buried if they do this shit.
>>
>>339396493
vega is releasing this october
>>
>>339393821
Because I said so
>>
File: b173.jpg (68KB, 500x320px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
b173.jpg
68KB, 500x320px
>finally time to replace old faithful
ye shall be missed.

Finally I can play dark souls 3 in 720p at a whopping 30fps (*with drops)!! What a time to be alive.
>>
File: so many stars.jpg (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
so many stars.jpg
1MB, 1920x1080px
>>339396502
and with your TFLOPS priviledge, play with the magnitude limit values.

>set LOD to 2
>look for magnitude limit controls
>planets magnitude to 10
>star magnitude to 9
>galaxies magnitude to 12

Also try if instant load works with no stutters, if so, you are perfect, if not use asynchronous loading.
>>
>only one month or so away from building the new PC I've been waiting over a year for with a 1080 and an ultrawide monitor
Fucking finally.
>>
File: AMD-GPU-Roadmap-2016.jpg (146KB, 1138x641px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
AMD-GPU-Roadmap-2016.jpg
146KB, 1138x641px
>>339396662
>>339396580
Incorrect. the 400 series is releasing this year. With probably a 490x by November. But VEGA, or the successor to Fury, won't release until next fiscal year. Su (the CEO) confirmed this in April at their financial briefing the have at the start of every fiscal year (which is public and you can track down and listen to if you have a few hours to kill). This slide was posted in the fiscal year financial review too.
>>
>>339373357
the announcement is literally tomorrow though

anyway I'm thinking of getting 1070 and 1440p monitor unless AMD has really good value cards
>>
>>339372347
Polaris has already been confirmed to be low-mid end trash. Vega is where it's at, but

>waiting for amd's next POS
>actually falling for "it g-gets b-better n-next year!" amd meme

lmao
>>
>>339396825
Alright. I'll try to get some screens before this thread is gone
>>
Is a Core i5 4th generation too weak to be bothering with this?
>>
>>339395073
They're not out yet.

>>339395374
Reference design comes straight from Nvidia, from PCB to fan to shroud to power delivery to video output ports, it's the way Nvidia put everything together, and partner board companies can choose to go with it for their cards.

Reference designs tend to use blower-style coolers, which eject hot air out of the case so it doesn't heat up your other components, but since it uses only a single fan, it doesn't keep the GPU as cool or quiet as an open-air design, which sends hot air back into the case, but can use multiple large fans to keep the card much cooler at lower noise levels and provide much better overclocking headroom for temperature reasons. It's not hard to deal with the hot air in a case with proper airflow anyhow, so blower designs are really only good in SFF cases.

Partner boards can also have different PCB layouts or bigger PCBs, better power delivery for more stability during overclocking, heatsinks that are larger than the PCB to allow for more/bigger fans, and different display output options in the back.

In general, reference designs, particularly the coolers, have proven to be shit for high-end GPUs like the 290x and 980ti, barely adequate for midrange cards, and just a bad option in general when partner designs exist with better components, factory overclocks, much better coolers, and way more overclocking headroom, often for the same price or not much more.
>>
>>339396835
>tfw also planning on pascal with ultrawide

3440x1440?
>>
>>339396983
>Navi

We Avatar now
>>
File: 1419692138892.jpg (1MB, 4080x2122px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1419692138892.jpg
1MB, 4080x2122px
>>339397086
This is the biggest pic i have, some anon post it long ago.
>>
>upgrade pc
>there's literally only shitty console ports that are demanding
>keep playing the same decade old crap anyway

You all know this is true. Upgrading just for the sake of it is much more appealing than what you actually do with the hardware. The only game since fucking forever that was demanding and good was Witcher 3 and even then only if you didn't care about gameplay that much.

What are you gonna play on this crap? Fucking batman? Assassin's Creed? Call of Duty? For fuck's sake.
>>
>>339382413
no faggot.

lil baby can't wait 1 more day for them to show it?

ffs, dumb cuck
>>
>>339397162
depends.

If you can OC it to 4.0 or you are above that, you are good for years.
You can even OC only 2 cores a little more, and still wont bottleneck.
>>
>>339397398
Damn that's nice. Two minutes left on the download so I should have some soon.
>>
File: scr00000.jpg (2MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
scr00000.jpg
2MB, 3840x2160px
>>339396502
Set your star scale to 0.750 and start exposure to 10.5 otherwise you get images like this shit >>339395783

and not pic related
>>
>>339397191
So avoid getting reference fans then?
>>
>Buying nvidia gimp cards
Good goy
>>
>>339397627
go outside our solar system, they have average textures, there are some hi res texture packs if you want to digg more.
>>339397702
also this.
>>
>>339396825
>>339395783
>>339397398
>>339397702
Can we stop talking about GPU's and just post more SE. I really need to fap
>>
When are the nonfounder 1070s coming out?
>>
>>339397743
>buy AMD
>nvidia still fucks you over with gimpworks
you lose no matter what you buy
>>
should I even bother getting a new GPU with a AMD Athlon II X4 640 CPU?
>>
File: 1419695484768.jpg (467KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1419695484768.jpg
467KB, 1920x1080px
>>339397897
But... muh teraflops...
>>
File: Mercy.gif (1MB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
Mercy.gif
1MB, 400x400px
>>339397940
Reference PCB with custom coolers and factory OC on launch day, same as the 1080
>>
>>339397191
>In general, reference designs, particularly the coolers, have proven to be shit for high-end GPUs like the 290x and 980ti, barely adequate for midrange cards, and just a bad option in general when partner designs exist with better components, factory overclocks, much better coolers, and way more overclocking headroom, often for the same price or not much more.

just an outright lie and i've been buying high end video cards since 1996

also the new 1000 series uses a vapor change cooler reference design. dumbass.
>>
>>339397962
Nvidya owns the market. You're fucked no mater what but if you just avoid AMD you at least get some lube. Why suffer for you /g/ values?
>>
>>339398232
So reference fans are good?
>>
File: bad.png (77KB, 852x239px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
bad.png
77KB, 852x239px
Feels bad man
>>
File: 1464581229175.jpg (150KB, 1000x889px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1464581229175.jpg
150KB, 1000x889px
>all this tech porn
>I'm still stuck with a gt 330
>>
>>339398362
no. they're pretty much always adequate though. in a lot of generations, third party coolers are based on the reference cooler design, so that guy doesnt even know what hes talking about.
>>
>>339384260
because 1440p you goob
>>
>>339398427
>gt 330
>playing with a bargain card from 2009

I feel like a need to hold you and tell you everything will be okay.
>>
>>339398232
And everyone who's done a review of Nvidia's overpriced reference 1080 has noticed thermal throttling and high temperatures. Dumbass.

Always wait for open-air AIB cards. Always.
>>
>>339386163
sounds like you'd need a ridiculously high viewing angle to actually see the difference

I have 1680x1050 and I can barely see the pixels when right in front of it

I still want a 1440p for shooting games like arma where dudes are hundreds of meters away
>>
>>339398427
why are dogs so smart, its like they always know
>>
>>339372007
tfw no evga blower styled 1080 :(
>>
>>339385625
Because you get a 34inch+ monitor and the image fits it well, ever try getting close to your 1080p TV when playing a game on it? Looks like fucking shit
>>
>>339372007

fuck off to /g/ pcucks, this is a VIDEOGAMES board
>>
File: este2493thicker.jpg (90KB, 423x600px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
este2493thicker.jpg
90KB, 423x600px
>>339398897
>I have 1680x1050 and I can barely see the pixels

do you have a tiny screen or are you blind?
>>
>>339398897
arma would be AMAZING on a 4k monitor but damn if you wouldn't need some NASA tier juice to run it
>>
>>339388768
I want to buy that exact monitor. The reviews are really good and it's 144 hz.

my current monitor is from 2008

I'd get 4k but the IPS ones are even more expensive and only 60 Hz which is pretty lame
>>
>>339398606
I mentioned partner companies having the option to stick with Nvidia's reference designs, or change them up as they see fit, chimpdick. And guess what? AIB designs that use blowers tend to not be as good or quiet as the ones that use multi-fan open-air designs, even from the same company. They mostly do that nowadays to make a cheaper blower card than the ones that use Nvidia's metal shroud anyhow, not to make their best cards.
>>
>ultrawide

lmao is this for asians?

humans see in 4:3. 16:9 is already widescreen you retards. If it's not wide enough, get a bigger screen or sit closer to it.
>>
>>339388768
why are some of you spergs so mad at ultrawide displays, 3440x1440 is fucking glorious for racing games and beats multiple display setups ANY DAY

and you go on about your multiple monitors later in the thread so no excuses, you fucking retard
>>
>>339399151
22" and 20/20 last time I checked

I put the smallest size afterburner overlay and it's individual pixels and it's tough to even read it

I'd say 32" minimum for 4k but they are very expensive
>>
>>339399980
Isn't 32'' a perfect fit for 4k?
>>
File: 1111.jpg (128KB, 1286x750px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1111.jpg
128KB, 1286x750px
Should i upgrade or wait for the 1080ti?
>>
>>339399716
>humans see in 4:3
I never thought I'd see something stupider than "people can't see over 24/30/X FPS"
>>
>>339398746
To be fair my PC is from 2009-2010. The processor seems decent (I5 quad core 3.2 ghz) and upgrading the ram is cheap anyway. I just can't wait to get my hands on some decent money and finnaly play some vidya post 2010

>>339398942
maybe the dog was the one that cucked him?
>>
>>339400530
yeah but most I saw were 27"

4k 32" is right up against the limits of human vision even if you're a couple feet from the screen with like 60 degree field of view

I doubt I would really make use of that since my vision isn't great and the screen gets further away towards the edges

gonna get a 27" 1440 for myself desu
>>
File: scr00000.png (673KB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
scr00000.png
673KB, 2560x1440px
>>339397702
>>339397880
Got it. Not sure where to go
>>
>>339401280
Just realized the screen shot was 1440p. Not sure why since I have it set to 2160
>>
>>339401212
closer than any other aspect ratio anyone uses

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_eye#Field_of_view
>>
>>339401280
increase speed as fast as 1k ly a sec and start the warp drive.
>>
>>339401213
>finnaly play some vidya post 2010

You ain't missing anything bruh
>>
If I have a FX 8350 CPU is it fine if I buy an Nvidia GPU or the performance will get fucked?
>>
>>339401820
Same CPU, gtx 760. It'll be fine.
>>
File: scr00010.jpg (350KB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
scr00010.jpg
350KB, 2560x1440px
Why the hell are all my screenshot at 1440 when my display is 2160?
>>
>>339372347
this meme
>>
>>339402290
looks like you're upscaling. Make sure to open the compatibility on the exe file and disable scaling on high dpi displays
>>
>>339378849
why pick a toilet when you have a DESIGNATED shitting beach?
>>
>>339387534
>>339378270
desu electronics cost way more in turkey compared to eu. but what i do is this, i order my gpus from usa amazon. it takes about 15 days for it to reach me but costs about 10-15% less (slightly higher than american amounts). amazon also takes care of all the tax etc.

also amazon rates between try/usd is a bit shit so i just pay it in dollaridos directly.
>>
>>339401820
Your CPU unless heavily overclocked will possibly bottleneck a super high end gpu. As in if you get a gtx 1080, you'd need to be pushing at least 4.8ghz on the CPU and even then it might still bottleneck on a couple heavy game.
>>
File: scr00002.png (4MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
scr00002.png
4MB, 3840x2160px
>>339402590
Thanks, solved the issue.
>>
>>339400908
bump
>>
File: 51MKwKenQ-L._SY300_.jpg (19KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
51MKwKenQ-L._SY300_.jpg
19KB, 300x300px
Hey guys I have pic related. I can get it 1580mhz boost stable. I can get my money back for it via warranty but is it worth going from this to a 1080?
>>
>>339403047
I am not planning to buy a 1080, for now.
Which GPU do you recommend based on my CPU so it won't bottleneck?
>>
File: 1400615686724.png (79KB, 1088x676px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1400615686724.png
79KB, 1088x676px
>>339403097
>>
>>339403434
No higher than a gtx 970. But from pure price:performance, consider an r9 390 or 390X if the price is right. Even then I'd recommend minimum of 4.4ghz overclock on your CPU. The 8350 is not an efficient CPU at all.
>>
>>339403407
Look at the benchmarks and decide. No one else can tell you what X amount of money is worth in performance for you.
>>
File: 1462561196159.jpg (20KB, 552x376px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1462561196159.jpg
20KB, 552x376px
>>339403654
>>
>>339403407
the 1080 reaches 1200 after all the circus of shitting the fan control and power trottle it has.

I say no. think it again when custom coolers come out, reference are really pure shit.
>>
File: scr00001.jpg (2MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
scr00001.jpg
2MB, 3840x2160px
>you will never live on a gas giant moon inside a nebula
>>
>>339403758
That's pretty sad to read, I wish I had this habit of searching and asking people before buying anything for my PC. The price for a R9 390X is pretty okay, just need to figure out which "brand" is better.
>>
File: scr00003.png (2MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
scr00003.png
2MB, 3840x2160px
>>339403097
One more pic before I go. Thanks again to the anons that told me about this
>>
>>339383337

Dude, 15% better is around 1/6th.
You pay 1/6th more for a 1080 over a 980ti.
1/6*$600 = $100
$700-$600 = $100
>>
>>339379715

>still have to ride your turbo in bycicle streets
>>
File: 1419697627880.jpg (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1419697627880.jpg
1MB, 1920x1080px
>>339403097
Now man find the best comfy planets and enjoy.

enable orbits and pause to find stuff.
short advices i can give you are:

>most of the cool planets are actually moons of a gas giant or a huge solid planet wich are rarest

check something if you like, i think is the same for everyone.
>go to the aldebaran star
>find the 9th planet
>has lots of ocean planets as moons
there you have a good spot for ocean amosphere places.

you can also play with those little clouds of dust to alter the background, making places like the center of a galaxy more obscure.

and the last one is.

with the screenshot function or with an automated screenshot software (to take screenshots every x amount of seconds)

>sit on favorite planet
>set the timer and the ingame time to make a natural day-night cicle
>set as backgrounds that change after 10 seconds

Best backgrounds ever.
>>
File: 1412526937404.jpg (74KB, 1680x1050px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1412526937404.jpg
74KB, 1680x1050px
>>339404359
Ill be watching.
>>
>>339404332
Anything from sapphire is good. The Powercolor PCS+ is also very good. Avoid Asus like the plague. The 390X is only maybe 7% faster than its non X counterpart but usually overclocks better. You could always wait for the gtx 1070 though. That seems to be what most of/g/ is doing. Pic related. Powercolor 390X.
>>
Are these non-reference cards as expensive as founder's edition?

For example what will be the approximate price for a gigabyte, MSI, etc. gtx 1070?
>>
So the 1070 will be best for 1440p? I fucked up and bought a freesync monitor. Not sure if I should crossfire Polaris 10 to utilize the freesync or if I should just buy a 1070
>>
File: scr00006.png (1MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
scr00006.png
1MB, 3840x2160px
>>339404359
I lied, one more. I know they're shitty but I'm having fun
>>
>>339405084
The difference of prices between a X and a non X version is pretty close, and the cheapest one is the triple color version of Sapphire.
Anyway, thanks for all this spoonfeeding and infos anon, I appreciate it. Fell hugged.
No homo.
>>
File: 1412527983548.jpg (136KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1412527983548.jpg
136KB, 1920x1080px
>>339405605
just play with the exposition.
That will darken things.
also
>black holes
>>
>>339405729
I meant triple cooler, not color.
>>
>>339405479
That's just it. The founders editions price is inflated to the sky for the early adopters fee. 3rd party cooled models will be the same price if not $50 less.
>>
>>339406342
So 3rd party models will be inbetween the "reference" and the "founder's edition"?
>>
File: 1080 Cad.jpg (449KB, 1228x1025px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1080 Cad.jpg
449KB, 1228x1025px
>>339406342
>3rd party cooled models will be the same price if not $50 less.

Looks like the preorders already are.

Canadian Prices in case you're wondering why so expensive.
>>
Asus
>>
File: scr00002.jpg (341KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
scr00002.jpg
341KB, 1920x1080px
>>
>>339406675
Reference and founders are one and the same. Check the reviews of the 1080. The founders models are not binned chips, the cooler is nothing special at all. There have even been reports of throttling issues. Their "founders" edition is literally their reference model with a new different looking shroud. The increased price tag is just their way of getting more money out of you.
>>
guys I've been waiting for 4 years, when I should I finally buy a graphics card?
>>
>>339383523
The ASUS Strix, a 8+6pin card has the same 2.1ghz limit.

Pascal cards have a 1.25volt limit on them for some reason, probably so we don't fry them. But some custom cards come with their own BIOS; the STRIX and the EVGA FTW for example.
>>
>>339407535
Go all out and get a 1080ti, should come out in Nov.
>>
>>339384037
The evga 970 specifically had issues that other 970s did not
>>
>>339407974
I dont think it can be worse than my gainward gtx 970 with the reference cooler.
The noise it generates is unreal
>>
Go with Asus, but wait a while before buying it.
Nothing out or coming out soon that would justify the purchase. Just save your money until they release their mid-range and super charged versions of their high-end cards. The only people that might be desperate to upgrade are the people that have the 600s and older cards.
>>
>>339407535
waiting is a meme
>>
>>339406684
>buying "founders edition"
are you literally retarded?
>>
File: scr00007.png (3MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
scr00007.png
3MB, 3840x2160px
>>339405605
Think I figured out the exposure thing.
>>
>>339408585
>implying my 670 isnt still enough to handle current games
>>
>>339401548
what happens if you just go warp speed in the same direction, does the game crash? inb4 universe sized screamer
>>
Wait for the Ti version, or better, the Ti version of the 1180.
>>
File: galaxies.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
galaxies.png
2MB, 1920x1080px
>>339408794
>pass throug an entire galaxy in a matter of seconds. keep going away from the milky way
>now its the same but with galaxies.
>>
>>339409036
I meant if it ever ends, does it keep going until you run out of RAM or is there a limit to it?
>>
File: stepup.png (46KB, 800x521px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
stepup.png
46KB, 800x521px
>>339372007
>not buying EVGA
just got a free upgrade to the 1080.
>>
File: 1415724233823.jpg (496KB, 1920x1153px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1415724233823.jpg
496KB, 1920x1153px
>>339409093
On early versions, you could find a limit when galaxies stop being generated.
Now i think they keep going, most of the times the game crashes first.
If you start outside a galaxy, and just keep going, i think you will be like that for like 10 minutes untill the game crash.
>>
>>339409356
That only counts for gpus bought in the last 90 days though
shits dumb
>>
>>339409487
yeah that's true but it was great being able to buy a 980 ti three months ago, use it until now, then trade it for a brand new upgrade.
>>
>>339409428
Noice. Might donate 60$ to the project, hope guy wont run away with the money lol
>>
>>339404015
I buy nvidia, but they're jewry on this is too obvious.

>we called it the founder's edition because we'd like to offer our product directly to customers
>we didn't outright rename the term "reference card" to fool people

Fucking assholes.
>>
>>339408625
>are you literally retarded?
Seems you are, as you didn't even fucking read my post.
>>
>>339396217
>implying pick-and-place pcb assembly is a brand new concept just because they decided to make a video about it
>>
>>339409705
How did they fuck it up, 9xx blowers were pretty good.

Also is there actually any diff between standard 10xx ref and the founder's edition?
>>
File: 1415535957397.jpg (2MB, 4672x3104px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1415535957397.jpg
2MB, 4672x3104px
>>339409705
Look how the fucking card looks.
Like they had some LOD polycount problem with the design or some retard thought with those angle will deflect shit reviews like the stealth plane.
>>
File: 1379239741088.png (2MB, 1680x1050px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1379239741088.png
2MB, 1680x1050px
>>339409612
He somehow plans to make an MMOrpg out of it if he gets enough money.
he is on like 40k now. look at the goals in his site.
I dont know, ruskies has its history with software and scams, but this was going for many years now, and got a ton of updates.
This is one of the oldest pics i have.
It looks good, but like shit compared to how it looks now.
>>
>>339410040
The FE is the reference card. You're paying $100 to buy directly from nvidia instead of picking up something from EVGA/MSI/etc.

They're literally selling the reference card under the pseudonym of "founder's edition" and charging an extra $100 for it.
>>
>>339372007
>Buying into the memecard
>Buying into memecard 2.0
>>
>>339372007
What's the difference?
>>
>>339410462
Oh I thought FE was some one up version.

And IIRC ref is always a bit more expensive then aftermarket, my 980 sure was
>>
>>339409772
I assumed it was always automated, the surprising part was more that they or anyone used assembly lines for this shit.

Now i know why half the shit anyone orders is dead because some gook fucked it up or some nigger or spic threw it around in shipping.
>>
>>339383012
>Comes to South America
>It's almost $1400
you think you got it hard?
>>
File: 154671234561.jpg (42KB, 233x278px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
154671234561.jpg
42KB, 233x278px
>>339410586
it'll probably have cut ram again
>>
>>339410886
>tfw a GTX 980 TI that costs R$ 4500
>>
>haha I cant have it as bad as these dudes
>check prices
>900 USD

Fucking hell
>>
>>339387664
Anyways the most important metric is FPS/$, which the 380x was winning lately until the 1070 benchmarks, but I'm pretty sure Polaris cards are focusing on that
>>
>>339372007
Wait for volta, >2x power and the Price will be om par if not lower than 1080, and by the time it comes out it will be during the next console generation when true 4K gaming is actually viable for developers.

And if you wana stay at 1080p the 1080 will cost 1/3.
>>
>>339411057
Already been tested and confirmed that it doesnt (by third party)
>>
>>339411293
>benchmarks are reference cards are relevant

None of these benchmarks tell the whole story. Even up against a reference card, AMD is left in the dust. Once aftermarket OC hit, it will be an even wider gap.
>>
>>339411397
Tested the 1080 or the 1070?
>>
>>339411603
1080 I don't know, it also has some thermal throttling issues.

1070 is the one that was tested, no new 3.5GB meme unfortunately.
>>
File: 1462667188020.gif (60KB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1462667188020.gif
60KB, 640x360px
>tfw gotta upgrade cpu first
>>
>>339412013
Noice I guess, gonna cause a whole new line of salt this time around now that there is no VRAM gimp

And ya 1080 ref is fucked, strix one seems good though
>>
>>339412176
what are you on currently
>>
>>339411290
>mfw I just did this
well, I could only find stuff on the
>Founders Edition
but still
I sure hope the 1070 doesn't turn out the same way
>>
File: spaceengine.jpg (4MB, 7680x4320px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
spaceengine.jpg
4MB, 7680x4320px
>>339397398
Puny!
>>
File: It's full of stars.jpg (325KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
It's full of stars.jpg
325KB, 1920x1080px
>>339401548
>>
>>339413260
Ending transposition...
>>
>>339413506
>Transposition finnished, you have arrived at your destination.
>where is earth??
>>
File: 1329193765645.png (418KB, 458x610px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1329193765645.png
418KB, 458x610px
Do I sell my 970 and buy a 1070?

Or do I buy another 970 and SLI that shit?

Please help
>>
>>339414853
this is my situation as well
>>
>>339414853
>SLI 970
Sure, if you're fucking stupid.
>>
>>339414853
You should find a way to improve the cooling of your card and push the OC or start to if you didnt.
Push what you have to its limits before spending a coin.
Maybe a few shit fans will leave you room to max out almost everything and wait untill this new gen of cards establish a little more.
>>
>>339415216
I've already OC'd it to the point where I'm comfortable

It runs 99% of games just fine, but I'm thinking ahead for VR
>>
>>339398012
i wouldn't bother. if you're on that CPU your architecture is limited to the point that it would slow down a newer gpu a lot
>>
>>339415327
nah, most of the issues with VR are software related.
that VR ready bullshit is another shill tactic.
optimizations will come with the HMD software, not with the videocard drivers.
Maybe, and i repeat MAYBE. with that shit technology they showed, it could increase the performance, but i dont think it will be that much. the aim is not that high, the display of rift and vive wont reflect the actual render resolution, the HMD wont have to render a 1440p scene x2, it just have to render the half of that, and then past both parts on the screen to each eye.
so, if you have 2 monitors you can test this, open 2 games and test if you can play them at decent fps seting the monitors at a similar resolution (make a custom res if you really want the most acurate results) and see.
>>
File: scr00002.jpg (4MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
scr00002.jpg
4MB, 3840x2160px
>>339405774
>not posting 0.9.7.4 black holes
>>
File: scr00003.jpg (3MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
scr00003.jpg
3MB, 3840x2160px
>>339416768
perhaps you would like to get closer?
Not too close now.
>>
File: 1412507428484.jpg (193KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1412507428484.jpg
193KB, 1920x1080px
>>339416768
>got the 0.974 rc1 back then because of rift support
So now it got a release version.
Thanks anon, time to update.
>>
File: scr00004.jpg (1MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
scr00004.jpg
1MB, 3840x2160px
>>339416947
Maybe I should stop?
>>
File: 1451490604329.jpg (139KB, 752x581px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1451490604329.jpg
139KB, 752x581px
>>339416947
This with the rift.
Ohgod im so done.
>>
File: scr00005.jpg (2MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
scr00005.jpg
2MB, 3840x2160px
>>339417095
Oh shit!
>>
File: scr00006.jpg (3MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
scr00006.jpg
3MB, 3840x2160px
>>339417235
Help!
>>
>>339383012
stop being a socialist shithole
>>
File: scr00007.jpg (746KB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
scr00007.jpg
746KB, 3840x2160px
>>339417397
CAN'T WAKE UP!
>>
File: scr00008.jpg (128KB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
scr00008.jpg
128KB, 3840x2160px
>>339417515
Saaave meeeeee!
>>
File: 1430724406572.jpg (31KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1430724406572.jpg
31KB, 480x480px
>>339417624
anon????
>>
>>339417180
Anything we can do to simulate the pull of gravity distorting out bodies?
>>
EVGA
>>
>>339416768
IT GOT UPDATED?
>>
>>339417397
>>339417515
>>339417624

the fuck is happening here?!
Some one explain
>>
>>339400908
putting a 1080 in that would be a waste of a 1080
>>
File: 1412511307380.jpg (385KB, 1680x988px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1412511307380.jpg
385KB, 1680x988px
>>339417808
there is another game on steam that lets you send asteroids and play more with the physics of planets and such, like the animations you use to see on discovery channel about meteor hits or shit like that, its paid, and there is not that much beyond that, its an improvement compared to space engine, but its not that much for a paid thing for now, i dont know if it has plans to expand into something else, i think it will be like a uninverse sandbox, and i thing thats the name of the "game"
>>
>>339417972
release candidate has been out for over 6 months. You need to go to the development status forms and go to the 0.9.7.4 progress thread. I don't know why it isn't official yet since it's no more or less buggy than 0.9.7.2
>>
>>339417979
ask someone who came back from a black hole.
or try to go yourself, remember to take some matches.
>>339417972
this update was a beta to support the rift on the new version of "direct mode" before the Cv1 came out.
but now its an actual update, im downloading it too.
>>
>>339400908
>you need a new computer bro.
That cpu is long gone, not even the most extreme OC can save it.
>>
>>339400908
There is a limit to how long you can keep upgrading and there is nothing worth salvaging in that pile of shit.

You're motherboard is so old you can't find anything to even reach min requirements
>>
File: sweatingman.jpg (16KB, 230x300px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
sweatingman.jpg
16KB, 230x300px
>>339418231
what happens when they touch?
>>
File: 1387641948918.jpg (782KB, 1878x1748px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1387641948918.jpg
782KB, 1878x1748px
>>339419059
This is a Worksafe board, thats too lewd to show.
here is the dark side... thats as far as i can post.
>>
>>339372007
I like to play my games maxed out in 144hz 1080p.

1070 or 1080?
>>
File: 51464616.gif (688KB, 320x246px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
51464616.gif
688KB, 320x246px
>>339376591
there wont be a gtx 1080 under the christmas tree this year for those line workers
>>
>>339421456
970 will do that. If you're going to get a 10xx get a 1440p monitor
>>
>>339421824
970 currently can't do that, no.
Source: My 970 can't max games out and still get over 100fps most of the time.
>>
>>339396771
I just bought one of them on friday to retire my 280.
Thread replies: 478
Thread images: 103
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y / ] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
If a post contains illegal content, please click on its [Report] button and follow the instructions.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need information for a Poster - you need to contact them.
This website shows only archived content and is not affiliated with 4chan in any way.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoin at 1XVgDnu36zCj97gLdeSwHMdiJaBkqhtMK