9.4
.
4
>flush with tactical depth
>>339095751
Looks good to me
So much tactical depth they had to list it twice.
why did they write tactical depth
Giving a fuck about IGNThey went full retarded YEARS ago
>>339095751
Those asses are at least 9.4/10, let me tell ya
>>339095751
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA SHIT GAME CONFIRMED>>339095886
Damn this game must be tactically deep
>>339096026
buzzword quota
>>339095751
>9.4
LMAO can't even top one man game
at least it's better than battleborn
>>339096142
>some furry's sexual fantasy's gets a 10/10 from IGN
Well that tells a lot about the kinds of fetishes these guys partake in
>>339095751
Fucking rekt
Overshills on suicide watch
Will Overeatcah get more awards than TW3?
>>339095751
How deep are the tactics in this game?
>>339096142
Isn't it just pvp with payload and shit? If you use that term on both, battleborn would be more "tactically deep."
>>339096250
Stay mad
>>339096340
>MP Only
>Getting more than one award
>>339096142
>Kallie Plagge
As to be expected, tumblr creation for tumblr, the intended audience after all, tumblr is basically the synonymous with female.
it's a 7/10 and everyone knows it
fuck blizzard
>>339096041
This review is right you know. We praise Diablo but shit on this but all that changes is perspective.
Really makes you think
>>339095751
No Steam.
No buy.
And nothing of value was lost.
>>339096041
Borderlands 2 was great you neanderthal.
>>339095751
Why is "tactical depth" repeated twice?
>>339096402
as deep as tracer's womb
paid review
>>339095751
activision paid for that score, just like cod.
overwatch is a good game though.
>>339096712
tactical depth in the maps and tactical depth in the team
its retarded but makes sense
>>339096041
>that last comment
Literally why not 10.0? Petition when?
>>339096660
>Being unable to get the game on release day cause some shipping error
>All my steam friends are playing it right now
Never felt so excluded in my life
WELP, TIME TO GO HOME
>>339097194
Its not on steam, dumbfuck
>tactical depth
there is 0 depth in overwatch, don't kid yourself
>>339097406
Anon is it fun being this mentally challenged?
>tactical depth
>tactical depth twice
>>339096660
I know we throw this word around a lot but this is an actual Valvedrone.
>>339096845
technically any decision at all is "tactical", no matter how pointless
left! right! tactics!
>>339098121
blizzshill pls go
>>339095751
>sparse modes
>9.4
>>339097859
>All my steam friends are playing it right now
you tell me.
>excellent map design
/v/ literally on suicide watch. Admit it, Overwatch is great.
I don't trust IGN.
>>339098850
>IGN
>meaningful
wew
>>339098925
That's because they are meaningful and you fags are too arrogant to accept the truth.
>>339098850
Never ever PC-cocks!
>>339099089
wew
>>339095751
Wow, this totally does not stink ofbribed reviewer musk.
>bursting with character
subjective
>versatile skill
objectively wrong
>excellent map design
objectively wrong. In what world is generic plaza with surrounding corridors and ledges "excellent"?
>tactical depth TWICE
Again, objectively wrong.
Also, downsides
>no content
still gets a 9.4 somehow
>>339098924
But Air Ride is mediocre.
>>339099191
I sound paranoid saying this, but i believe there's some sort of anti-Kirby conspiracy at IGN.
None of his games has received a good score. Ever.
>>339098456
Epic comeback.
>>339096142
>>339096142
They gave this fucking game a 10 after it was already a meme.
I'm sure in time people will wonder what the fuck IGN was thinking like Gamespot's review of Chrono Cross.
>>339098924
We need to make a petition!
>excellent map design
HAHAHA THE MAPS ARE LITERALLY TRASH
IGN IS KNOWN FOR PAID REVIEWS
>>339099556
well, i kinda harassed the reviewer on twitter for a while after almost 10 years of that review. does that count?@mattcasa
>>339098850
it's great, but it isn't worth full price or even the $40 pricetag.
it's a MP game only and plenty MP only games that've come before it and were equally fun got shit on for not having a SP.
I'm enjoying overwatch well enough but the maps are really bad. Theres no real way to get around that.
>>339099297
Maybe it's because none of the Kirby games IGN reviewed are good
WE.
WON.
>>339099875
But they reviewed them all!
>>339096142
>not - absolutely shit art that will draw away most people
I tried this game but damn it's fucking ugly
>>339100031
It's a fun game. I like it. That's what I'll say about it.
Scores like these are always so fucking stupid, especially when they get into the 100's (And yes, this is is the 100's, because the faggots use x.y)
Just say if the game is good or bad, fucking hell.
>amazing
>nota-mei-zing
blizz should have put an extra 10k into it
>>339100152
It's also not that fun, which is kind of the point of videogames. Undertale's a 6/10 at best, and that's being extremely generous.
>>339095751
I had typed out a long legit response until I saw, "tactical depth" twice.. Obviously a bait pic.
>9.4
>game gets boring in less than 5 hours
Bravo blizz
>>339099112
I can just watch it on youtube for free instead of paying to watch it on ps4.
Trusting IGN
Teh game might even be good but lets face it IGN doesnt give good reviews anymore, the review is shallow as hell.
Alos they gave 7.5 to this absolutely umplayable piece of shit.
>>339095751
>Excelent map design
>Tactical depth listed twice
I enjoy Overwatch for what it is, it's a fun and simple shooter that fills that urge if you have it but let's not pretend it's more than that. There is verey little lactial depth to the game, it's as casual as it comes.
>>339100757
>I only play at the casual level
it looks like 7.0 garbage but it's better than mkx apparently
>>339100893
It's really not as in-depth as you wish it was.
>>339100997
Oh for sure, MKX is garbage
>>339096657
>Really makes you think
That you're an idiot, yes.
>>339096660
>No Steam.
>No buy.
Never realized shitbirds like you actually exist. How depressing.
>>339096657
And adds the lowest of the low shit tier Gearbox writing and "humor".
Borderlands 1 was fine as an FPS Diablo, minus a few issues. BL2 was a meme ridden agenda pushing mess.
>>339101862
But Diablo had satisfying combat. Borderlands's gunplay is awful.
>>339099112
I actually find that score to be rather accurate, just for different reasons.