CIV VI Gameplay
- Home
- Board: /v/ - Video Games
- Reading: CIV VI Gameplay
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2qzC5cUQcFk
>>338835615
It doesn't actually look that bad in motion.
>>338835615
i like that build up animation otherwise really the only thing i can knock it for is hexes (hurf)
oh well
>>338835735
It still looks like a mobile game though.
>>338835615
looks like a facebook game
>>338835615
>Teddy Roosevelt
Yeah boy.
Also I'm glad they kept the animated leaders. They kind of look like Kalypso-tier caricatures though, not that it's a bad thing.
I just wish the visuals overall were better.
>>338835615
TEDDY CONFIRMED
the new fog of war looks badass
The colors looks a bit darker there? Maybe they listened to the criticism?
>>338835615
Hope redeemed
I thought it looked like shit in the screenshots but actually that looks pretty cool. I love the way that the wonders seem to get built.
>>338835615
>fucking Teddy confirmed
No reason to ever not play America
>>338835831
>>338835884
I don't mind the art style. Running this at 120 fps will look and play great.
The buildings look nice, but the units look retarded.
CIVICS ARE BACK
>>338835615
Graphics still look shit but everything else seems pretty good.
I don't like quill18. He is too energetic and happy. Link me some cynical grumpy analytical pseudo intellectual instead.
>>338836537
Some bits look nice. The units look bad but I really like the fog of war for instance and cities/buildings are fine to good.
>>338836581
>Link me some cynical grumpy analytical pseudo intellectual instead.
Totalbiscuit?
>>338836229
>Running this at 120 fps will look and play great.
completely irrelevant if AI turns take minutes.
Looks so promising!! as a mod maker <3 and the whole game looks nifty
Is there a version out there without some faggot talking over it?
>>338835615
It looks exactly like a mobile game. Menus, UI and all.
Green grass and yellow grass? Is that supposed to be desertic or arid or something? The visuals are horrible. And i play this shit since the original, so don't come to me with that graphics are important bullshit, it's this damn artstyle which gives the looks of some budget title of some nobody studio.
>>338835615
was gonna watch it, then i was like meh, i'll just wait until the game is out to watch streamers
>>338836836
suck cock
>>338835615
Oh shit nigger is that Teddy roosevelt?
>Builders instead of workers that can make tiles instantly
Thank fucking god
>two sience trees
Fascinating
Seems like they have streamlined the game but added on the stuff the streamlined
The grafix still rumb me the wrong way tho
in some weird sense it feels like homm
i kinda like it
You guys know what I really miss in Civ.
In Civ 2 they had these mini wonder clips they would play once you've completed them.
Actually learned a lot from the game.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LHeyi3UbtX8
I also liked the advisors.
Felt super real (granted cheezy now) to me at the time.
Especially how advisors can give you the wrong advice at times, just like it was back them.
Was super immersive to me.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FlTIk80uBPg
Gameplay looks pretty good.
Graphics are OH MY GOD WHY THE FUCK bad.
Like even as stylised games go, this is dreadful. The terrain looks so dull and uninspired.
>>338837259
>feels like homm
No it fucking does not.
>>338835615
The unexplored areas having a map fabric look to them is cool.
>>338837270
These clips were also in Civ3 and Civ4, at least the complete games.
>>338837409
I like this as well
Just realised why it felt so weird.
The graphics style looks almost exactly the same as Warlocks MotA.
And thats not a compliment. Warlock's UI was trashy and felt out of place, so does Civ6 .
>>>338835735
this is literally one of only two things i care about in this newest installment. 1. faster AI. 2. better AI.
It won't be better, I know this. They can't make good AI. But at least make it fast.
>>338837435
Ah ok, Never had the complete versions of Civ3 and 4. Only the ripped ones via download.
Civ type games weren't sold in stores here at the time.
The graphics remind me of Age of Empires Online, which I kinda liked.
It has its charm.
The leader animations look really cool. Looking forward to discovering the new leaders.
>>338835735
>>338836148
oh REALLY !!
fuck the noobs who thought it would look bad in motion
fuck. you.
Ice cream? I love ice cream!
>>338837810
>noobs
2006 go home
>>338836581
Arumba
>MFW THAT LEADER SCREEN
HOLY FUCK IM SOF UCKH HYP ED
>>338838087
>implying this word is not vomited by all the players on every online games ever even today
>>338838274
>hyped
2006 go home
Sounds like it has more depth this time. I definitely would give Civ VI a try. Maybe pirate it and if it's a great game, I'll buy it.
>a warmonger who dislikes warmongers
So this guy is the new Alexander?
>>338838421
>like, that is SO 2006! lamerz
why is it that nobody at firaxis had the thought that, in a game where you lead a civilization through the millenniums of human history on a truly epic historical scale, making the game look like a p2w tablet game might not be a good idea?
>>338835615
>Get's b-roll.
>Doesn't cut out the black transition screens they add to make it easier for media to edit the footage.
>guy receives the privilege to talk about and show gameplay footage
>it only does praises
Yep, i'm certain this ain't biased at all. Remember people, every new release it's the best game in the series according to the marketing. Offcourse, that only last until the actual thing officially release.
I seem to be late to the party, but that looks absolutely fucking disgusting. What a cheap generic revolting art style.
Another good series down I guess.
>>338836229
It's going to look like ass and run like ass this is fucking Firaxis they will find a way to fuck it up somehow.
>>338836229
>120fps for a 4x game
fucking retarded
>>338837409
>>338837435
I'm sorta hoping that it goes from map fabric to a modern looking map around the Industrial era.
>>338835615
I had an IGN upload of the gameplay in my suggested videos and they made it private while I was watching lol
I've just realised that the UI and font used in the UI reminds me of the Warlock UI, and that wasn't the best looking UI it looked cheap.
>>338838462
Alexander doesnt like warmongers?
I know Alex is a dick regardless and will find reasons to get mad at you, but so far, me being Hitler wasn't one of those reasons
Usually: "You're near me", "City State BS" or "Im a fucking faggot"
>>338835983
Also the backgrounds are static.
Shame, aztec or indonesian intros looked great in CivV.
>>338839112
why the fuck not? you are retarded
>>338838884
>>it only does praises
no. sometimes he just describes stuff. sometimes he says he doesn't know what to expect.
what do you want? he obviously likes CIV V and he is hyped. why would you even watch this, if you don't already like the previous civ. nigga please
>>338835615
Looks too much like an iPad game or some shit, but everything else is good.
>>338839112
>I'm retarded: the post
two tech trees sounds like a great way to make science not as dominant as it was. it kind of hurts variety if you have to rush the science buildings as fast as possible every time with every civ.
>>338839136
I think that I read somewhere that the old-timey map effect for the fog of war remains irrespective of era.
>>338835615
>"Global happiness is no longer in Civilization VI."
Okay, I think I can live with these graphics, take my pre-order already
>>338839403
>why would you even watch this, if you don't already like the previous civ
Who says i don't? Liking previous games doesn't automatically makes me accept everything at face value. There was no critiscism in that video. I don't expect a review, but i certainly won't give credibility to someone who doesn't experience a single moment of "You know, this thing here feels a little off". Nothing is perfect in this world, this game won't be any different.
>>338835615
This looks like absolute trash. The worst thing about it is it looks so gay. I literally mean gay, with the brighty,disneyesq colours and playmobile looking terrain/cities. I mean look at the scout unit symbol. Its a happy chappy dog with a smile on his face. How the fuck are you meant to wage war looking like that.
>>338839403
he's obviously biased as fuck
>Gets picked by marketing to show their game
>Gets flown out to their HQ to get special treatment
>Get to play the game
>Comes back with marketing selected footage to show off
yeah he would totally criticizes the game he got flown out to play
yeah he would totally not be biased
yeah he would totally shit over this game he was flown out to play
>>338837270
i miss cleo
>>338836758
DABID!!!!!!!
>>338839716
>>338839746
so you will try to cherrypick what you feel off in a game 5-6 months from release instead of trying to enjoy yourself and be hyped?
okay. i understand the guy, i would be pretty happy and hyped if i had the chance to play a for a bit before everybody
why
>>338839740
>waging war with your scouts
???
Why is Gabe the leader of USA?
>>338840067
>>338840067
If he were, it would be a nicer place.
WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS UI IT LOOK SO FUCKING SHIT?
I mean I know it's a mobile game but come the FUCK on?
>>338840043
literally not the same guy, but he's obviously biased, you can't deny that he's biased.
you should watch person that aren't biased
>>338840291
Quill18 says the UI icons are placeholder.
>>338840067
He looks like he has bees in his mouth
>>338840170
>If he were, it would be a nicer place.
no it wouldn't, valve doesn't give a fuck about you, they just want your money
>>338840406
The icons are obviously missing but the overall look is so fucking cheap and... Sims?
>>338840067
why is he so fat?
The road changes sound fucking retarded I don't want to leave it up to the AI to build roads for me, especially when I may have an opponent plot their city where the AI decided to build it.
>>338840134
>kids with disposable income, having a fun time
>security guard working in the weekends
>>338840369
well who's watching the video to know if it's good or not, i'm more curious about the details of the gameplay.
>>338840406
The whole UI better be a placeholder. It looks like shit.
>>338837435
>>338837270
Best were the Alpha Centauri secret projects.
>>338840469
>>338840645
"A lot of the user interface stuff isn't done yet"
>>338840470
dunno, he wasn't THAT fat
guess they wanted him to seem more realistic to modern day americans
>>338840470
he was never THAT fat
Honestly the game looks great. The graphics and the UI looks much better than in Civ V.
>>338840525
i guess it was a proud elderly man with disposable income in a restaurant having a good time
so much disposable income
>>338840678
I get that, but the style itself that they're going for looks bad. Hopefully it'll change significantly.
>>338840291
That is honestly Flash-tier on a technical and aesthetic level
>>338840823
THICC
>>338835615
As much as poeple complain about the graphic, it has more visual clarity there ever before. I can only hope it stay that way in late game clusterfucks
>>338840823
>>338840823
i suppose she's considered overweight on /v/
>>338840291
They did say they have 5 months but you probably have a good point anon. On the other hand it looks like it was edited to not show the actual icons and stuff.
They did edit the footage so it makes sense that they wouldn't show off all the game has to offer. Besides, it definitely looks like they altered those icons. Times New Roman also looks pretty shit on that UI. Also a little bland but hopefully that changes.
>>338840823
i had to reload the fucking page, that landplanet fucked up my browser
>>338835615
Holy shit, how awful it must be to have a voice that terrible.
>>338840823
I remember when I was a kid and our dogs were getting fat, we use to take them to the beach so they can run around and shed some weight.
I feel the need to take this thing to the beach.
>>338837270
I miss the palace/throne room.
And the advisors from Civ 2.
>>338841037
they copied the AOW3 old-map style
>>338838859
The b-roll doesnt have dark transitions though, he is just rewinding and you get that while his video loads.
>>338841250
And release it back into the sea where it belongs?
>china can complete wonders with a builder unit
this sounds busted
Who's the narrator this time?
>>338841538
It looks like wonders take up a tile now though, so you probably can't build all of them that easily.
>>338841538
Not sure wonder spam is a thing any more. It's more about picking and getting what couple you want.
>>338840823
I want to slap it with paddles
>>338841793
>implying it's not definite cityspam and wonderspam now
![warlock-master-of-the-arcane-1[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/zyXj1rf.jpg "warlock-master-of-the-arcane-1[1]")
>>338840448
Gaben is a libertarian, and anti-corporation, etc.
If you watch him give more free form lectures his political and ideological views really show, and he seems a good guy to have in charge.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t8QEOBgLBQU
>>338841037
>>338841258
>a good feature copied from another game
Nice. We need more of that. I really dislike when some good idea is only stuck in a single game, rather than spreading like cancer, as all good ideas should.
Still waiting on someone to copy Mount&Blade's combat and battle scale.
>>338841936
here this interview video is more recent
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UdSKWKZFdrU
>>338841936
>libertarian
>anti-corporation
BAHAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
http://www.gameinformer.com/games/sid_meiers_civilization_vi/b/pc/archive/2016/05/25/making-all-the-right-moves.aspx
>After building up my army more, focusing on a settler to establish a new city, and starting research on foreign trade, I run into Egypt's Cleopatra. All the leaders speak in their correct native language, a nice touch as Cleopatra greets me in Coptic. She invites me to visit her city and I agree.
>Civilization VI introduces leader agendas, and Cleopatra's is "Queen of the Nile," which states that she likes powerful militaries and will try to ally with them. Firaxis pulled this detail from her actual life; she aligned herself with powerful men like Julius Caesar and Mark Anthony, seducing them so Egypt wouldn't get attacked. She also has another randomly assigned hidden agenda that I'll need to discover through trade routes or by sending a delegation.
>Cleopatra likes me because I've been building up my army to take out that barbarian camp, but if you don't have a powerful military, she won't give you the time of day. Later, when my army loses forces facing the barbarian camp and I explore too close to her border, our relationship declines. She especially gets mad once I meet and stay on friendly terms with Teddy Roosevelt, whom she dislikes. Rumors and gossip show up about leaders throughout the game; this new system gives you more information to react to and plan your decisions around.
>>338842332
I like the part where you watched the video I linked and commented on it, instead of sperging out like a retard. I really enjoyed it.
>>338841421
Yes it does. Watch the video.
>>338842413
No, it doesnt, you imbecile.
The black screens are from the guy rewinding the video, not from the actual video.
You can quite literally hear him say stuff like "let me try to find X", then you see a black screen, and you are back to something he already showed before.
>>338835983
Agree but they don't look to bad. His model has a ton of detail and that animation is smooooooth.
Stalin back?
>>338842540
Why the fuck are you skipping the the first 3 minutes of the video with the super awkward black screens that aren't present on other sites B-roll because they fucking edited it out?
BIG STICK TEDDY
>>338842675
Other sites don't have the guy presenting rewind all the time. He is clicking through the duration bar and thats when the black screens appear.
>>338842675
B-rolls all have black empty spaces in between them, I think he changed the video file after the beginning as you can see the VLC pop-up display the filename.
>>338841936
>>338842402
Valvedronea everyone.
>>338842882
Watch the fucking video, you moron. Hear the guy talk about what he values rather than waving a dictionary like a sword.
>>338842882
it's so fucking apparent, he must be blind since he doesn't see it
>a Civ thread just turned into Valve debate
Just another day at the office.
It looks like shit, I really hate the aesthetic. It's not like Civ 5 was a demanding game in the first place, the only reason it gave systems trouble was because the ai inherently needed to burden one cpu core and couldn't be multithreaded. I doubt that's even something they can fix for civ 6.
>>338843619
>I doubt that's even something they can fix for civ 6.
yes they totally can, they were able to fix it with civ5 but instead fired most of the programmers
The graphics are bad but I like them, clean.CIV 5 was incomprehensible
>>338843619
It's a completely new engine, there is no excuse.
>>338843619
Yeah I like the water but the land just looks like fucking ass.
It looks pretty damn good.
>>338835615
fuck off, quill18
>>338835615
Looks pretty good, can't wait for it to be playable after the first expansion pack.
>>338840661
This.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iY57ErBkFFE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGCaACqy1Ro
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wh-ZcdO5fe8
>>338835615
>Civics are back
This is the one thing I asked for. I'm a bit more hopeful now
>>338835615
>gameplay
>it's actually just trailer b reel with an autist talking over it
okay
Looks pretty good.
>>338844198
>Civics
what is that?
>>338836112
>>338835615
I don't mind the new graphics but it should be said that the faggot who made the video desaturated it, probably to appeal to people who complained.
Here's the raw footage:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xU8VM-jtXHM
>>338844673
go play civ 4
Just as I predicted after seeing the cartoony look of the game, the diplomacy screens are literally caricatures.
>>338844853
if you don't want to say that's fine, no need to be an asshole about it.
>>338835615
Most are decent improvements, but seeing that video just makes me wish they made the tweaks a mod for CIV5 so we can play it with decent graphics. This aesthetic style really isn't working for me at all. I hope they change it before release.
>>338844673
Civ 4's equivalent to 5's social policy system. It was much better
stalin better be back.
I hope they just don't add the same old fucking people again.
My favorite Civ is 2, and I played a bit of 4 and it was ok. Which Civ is the best? Does 6 look any good?
>>338844717
he made the video by... recoding the video player as it was playing...
>Teddy
America is saved
>>338844961
unfortunately, this is not what they went for
>>338844193
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iY57ErBkFFE
How could they predict the future so well? I mean, they themselves censored Liberty Leading the People. How the fuck was old Firaxis so good?
>>338844984
Thank you, atleast you're not an asshole.
daily reminder that this game will suck as long as it has one unit per tile or something similar to it
Pretty fancy
>>338845067
Are you a retard?
>>338845058
What we know so far
America is Teddy
Egypt is Cleopatra
China is Qin Shi Huang
>>338845256
I like and prefer 1UPT.
>>338845256
Yeah because stacks of 20 units running around sure were fun.
Now that Teddy is confirmed, post your hopeful leaders
>Stalin
>Churchill
>Sun Tsu
Why the fuck have they just glossed over WWII and Cold War figures? Too recent?
>>338845378
This
>>338842373
>Cleopatra is Egypt's leader
Bullshit. If they wanted a historically relevant female leader for Egypt they could have used Hatshepsut. They literally had her in Civ 4. Instead they went with the woman whose greatest accomplishment was fucking two dumb Romans
Do you think they'll have hitler this time
or is everyone still scared of featuring one of the most notable world leaders in history
>>338845346
if you watch the video, he stops the player with his mouse
>>338844961
At least they actually speak in their languages unlike Civ Rev's foreign sounding gibberish. Still, it all looks to be a step down from what V had. Maybe that means we might get multiple leaders in expansions.
>>338845460
>>Sun Tsu
Nope, it's Qin Shi Huang I believe, see
>>338845373
Who else would it be?
>>338845319
rome was build in a day!
>>338845319
It will be cool for the first time but after that you are just going to skip that shit.
>DLC adds new leaders for each civ
>Largely the same, but small differences in bonus and mainly for aesthetics
>No more arguing over what leaders should have made it in for a specific civ, can just choose whoever you want
Would you buy it? Or is the idea shit?
>>338845571
Kingdom mod when?
>>338845515
Everyone can see that, retard. How does that have ANYTHING to do with what I said? Holy shit you are dumb.
>>338845465
the game is called Civ
Hitler never led a civilization
just a bunch of fedoras in costumes that illegally took over a country
>>338845596
Caesar, you´re drunk. Go home.
>>338841936
these grfx are awful
>>338845695
And Teddy led a nation made out of immigrants from all over the world, your point is?
>>338845630
>Largely the same, but small differences in bonus and mainly for aesthetics
Shit idea. If I just want small changes I'll download a mod, not give lazy devs my shekels.
>>338845695
if your country can get taken over by a bunch of fedoras in costumes then maybe it's time for a change of leadership anyways
>>338845256
there was a mod for civ5 that allowed stacking, it was pretty neat
>>338845421
unless each unit has significantly more impact on the game, you're just going to have 20 individual units instead
>>338839707
>"Global happiness is no longer in Civilization VI."
Thank fucking god. I'm tired of Civ having such strict limits to how I can expand.
Any word on how they castrate your expansions in this game?
>clicking and sitting and waiting for hours on end counts as "gameplay"
>Uncharted gets slated on /v/ for having no gameplay even though it has tonnes
kek, never change /v/
>>338845847
The main point is supposed to be the leader, not the small bonus changes
>>338845851
Well the Weimar republic was unstable as fuck anyway.
>>338845890
Uncharted players, everyone
>>338845421
Better than having to play a sliding block puzzle every time you need to move more than one unit somewhere.
>>338845881
cities need amenities to be happy and housing to expand past a certain point.
>>338845460
>Why the fuck have they just glossed over WWII and Cold War figures? Too recent?
Yes. They're polarizing
>>338845690
recording from the screen like that can have impact on the quality of the end video
but i guess you just want to shit on other people, you must have a really sad life
are there gonna be those short info scenes where its a drawing and a quote like in Civ 5
when you build a wonder?
>>338846037
CIV players everyone
>>338845460
because those leaders are all shit or memes.
Not thrilled with TR as the American leader choice. I just thought there are better choices like Lincoln or even Nixon if they want to go the modern, cynical route.
They already emphasized exploration and adventure as a thematic idea driving the game's presentation, so Teddy fits the bill. But I just think TR is one of the most overrated presidents by the internet.
>>338845695
i'm not denying that hitler was a shit leader in the end, but WW2-era germany was a powerhouse.
>>338845319
better
>>338846158
>churchill was a great leader but will never be included because he was RACISS WAAHH
just shoot me family
>>338845890
please be bait
>>338845890
>people talking about a game
>bring up something completely irrelevant other people were talking about in a different thread to stir shit
kek, never change /v/
>>338846249
churchill was a fucking shit leader
>>338846198
i think they went for him because he might have been more military focussed
>>338846158
>Stalin
>shit/meme leader
I've heard some stupid shit in my time, but this reaches new levels.
>>338846380
His "agenda" is actually that he likes peaceful Civs and fucking hates warmonger Civs.
>>338846363
this better be fucking bait
>>338846225
an unsustainable powerhouse
if they added hitler, the game would be banned in germoney
>>338846459
>warmonger
hope they removed that penalty
>>338845460
Jesus
Éamon de Valera
Shakala
Can we not have a civ thread devolve into /his/ shitposting for once, please?
>>338846557
There will be a more justified system, so you will receive less penalty for attacking a leader who denounced you
>>338846380
http://franchise.civilization.com/en/news/2016-05-theodore-roosevelt-leads-the-americans-in-civilization-vi/
>It should come as no surprise that America is represented in Sid Meier’s Civilization VI. The Americans have been a fixture in the Civilization series since its inception 25 years ago, and in Civilization VI they are being led by the nation’s 26th president, Theodore “Teddy” Roosevelt.
>Roosevelt took office following the assassination of President McKinley in 1901 and, at the age of 42, became the youngest United States President in history – a record he still holds today. Roosevelt championed his “Square Deal” domestic policy, comprised of three basic ideals: the conservation of natural resources, greater control over corporate plutocracy, and consumer protection.
>His efforts to regulate corporate “trust” monopolies earned him the nickname “trust buster.” He established the United States Forestry Service in 1905 and fought for the conservation of millions of acres of federal land, which are still protected to this day. Roosevelt also coined the iconic phrase "speak softly, and carry a big stick," describing his form of foreign policy of negotiating peacefully while simultaneously threatening with the "big stick." Roosevelt described this policy as “the exercise of intelligent forethought and of decisive action sufficiently far in advance of any likely crisis.”
>>338846757
>Unique unit: P-51 Mustang
>The P-51 “Mustang,” an aircraft created by America during World War II, was designed as a long-range, high-altitude fighter to serve in dogfights, escort bombers and even enact bombing missions on its own. The P-51 Mustang was able to outmaneuver the best German Luftwaffe fighters above 15,000 feet and even outlast the efficient Japanese fighters, and by 1943 the P-51 Mustang was in service on every American front.
>>338846757
>you will never rub teddy's big stick while speaking softly into his ear
>>338846425
he was a strong leader who kept his country together
by that logic tito and yugoslavia would also be in civ
>>338846860
So are we back to just one unique unit per civ?
>>338846860
>Unique unit: Rough Rider
>The 1st United States Volunteer Cavalry, better known by its colloquial moniker the “Rough Riders,” was a regiment recruited and raised by Theodore Roosevelt in 1898 AD to fight in the Spanish-American War. This volunteer regiment included 1,060 ranchers, cowboys, college athletes, miners and other rugged outdoorsmen hailing from New Mexico, Texas, Oklahoma and Arizona.
>>338845460
stalin was in civ a lot till civ 5?
still its bullshit.
>>338846860
That's what grass looks from a satellite image, they are doing it wrong.
>>338846757
>speak softly, and carry a big stickP-PLEASE DO
>>338846956
It's high noon.
>>338846956
>Unique Building: Film Studio
>Thomas Edison, the much vaunted American inventor and businessman, created the first film studio in West Orange, New Jersey back in 1893. His film studio was used to capture the amusing larks of vaudeville and theater actors, to display within penny arcades, fairground tents and unused theaters. By 1920, there were a dozen film studios in operation around Hollywood, California, each feeding what would become an American and global obsession with film
>>338846951
Not exactly, see
>>338846956
>China can insta build wonders
Waiting for filthyrobots tier list, shud b gud
>>338835735
This.
>>338846459
Shouldn't Teddy's agenda be to have a big military to threaten other civ to become peaceful?
>>338846889
that's a fat dog sadface.com
>>338847021
Fucking faggot
>>338847045
So every civ has two UUs and a unique building?
>>338835884
I want the children to leave.
It looks like a civilization game -- something which pre-dates facebook a decade or so.
>>338847021
>>338846889
Stop being such sluts, anons. Jeez.
>>338847126
America does.
It might be completely different for others.
>>338845847
Civ games are made up of small bonuses that can snowball the game, I think you're forgetting that.
>>338846425
>mismanaged his country so badly that 5+ million people starved to death
>good leader
>>338845890
>Hey guys, remember this game? Please pay attention!
>>338847163
Or maybe one of the UUs is tied to the leader (like Rough Riders are obviously tied to Teddy Roosevelt) allowing for multiple leaders?
This is just my speculation
>>338846757
>Roosevelt championed his “Square Deal” domestic policy, comprised of three basic ideals: the conservation of natural resources, greater control over corporate plutocracy, and consumer protection.
American need this desperately right now...
>>338847180
Speaking of snowball, has anything been mentioned yet that prevents this? Late-game snowball in MP was the most boring shit.
>>338846468
He was a great wartime leader, he was a mediocre peacetime leader.
>>338846921
>by that logic tito and yugoslavia would also be in civ
Except yugoslavia wasn't even close to being as influential or developed as a civilization as the Soviet Union/Russia. I'm not sure how you jumped from the subject of Stalin's leadership to including Yugoslavia.
>>338847142
make us
>>338847268
Well the one of the goals of Civ 6 is that they don't want you to use the same strategy over and over
Different playthroughs will be a lot more distinct
>>338847268
They're bringig back stacked units so I guess the focus isn't solely on having a more advanced unit, science dominators probably won't be as strong as say a production dominator that can pump out more units even if they are weaker.
>>338847354
the soviet union wasn't very influential.
all they did was bully neighbouring countries into being communist and failed at invading others
they left russia in a terrible state
>>338835735
>game doesn't look that bad with motion blur
>>338846425
i remember the original civ 4 encylopedia mentioned stalin somewhere as a horrible leader who killed millions of his own people, and who's only real achievement was driving out the germans in WW2. then they added him in the expansion pack anyway.
>>338847427
>science whores like korea can't turtle up and shit out a space victory in under an hour
thank god
>>338847427
>They're bringig back stacked units
Uhh not exactly, the system is still largely 1UPT, just with more sense like having some support AA guns embedded with your infantry.
>>338847201
>""misamanaged""
>transformed agrarian backwater shithole in modern industrialized superpower that rivaled the whole of the Western World, including the US, a country that was bearly touched by war, despite having been unimaginably shafted during the war and after-war deals compared to the West
>The most commanding figure in diplomatic gatherings, by the West's own admission
>"Bad" leader
This must be one of the worst memes around here.
>>338847045
I sure hope this isn't what cities will typically look like in industrial times. Like a bunch of parks separated by narrow paths.
>>338847237
Well, this time, only the leader is modeled, so maybe they'll feel more inclined to multiple leaders this time instead of Civ V's leader scenes that were heavily modeled.
>>338847268
at the very least, science isn't going to be as strong since the tech tree has been split into a science tech tree, and a cultural tech tree.
>>338847537
>Leaving any victory condition besides domination
Anon you're not playing the game right.
>>338847427
It's semi-stack.
Two unit combines with each other. Not sure if it two attack unit (2 warriors) to become a superunit thought.
It sound more like 1 attack and one support (1 warrior + 1 battery ram). Where the warrior now have a bonus taking down walls
>>338847489
>the soviet union wasn't very influential.
I hope you're joking.
>Leonard Nimoy wont be doing the voiceovers for intros/techs anymore.
I know it was super minor but was still neat for the old Star Trek nerd in me.
>>338847624
Infantry, vehicle, air units all stack, of course the same with workers, or builders as they're called now.
>>338845319
>>338846229
they just need to make the grass look better.
>>338847823
He was fucking awful desu.
Boromir will be a definite improvement.
>>338847823
>nimoy is dead
i had forgotten entirely
>bowie is dead
>the genie guy from Aladdin is dead too
jesus christ just end it all
>>338847315
So were a lot of people, stalin still did a lot for his time and he was the last "great" of his ideal, communism and how it worked the most out of anyone who tried it.
Its almost been a 100 years people need to get over this shit.
We just about got over japan,actually we got over them fucking fast, yet even though we never went to war with Russia we always made them the bad guys. they were our fucking allies.
Not to say stalin wasn't a terrible person he did kill.
In another 100 years Hitler will be in games like nothing and just be another history piece.
history is like that.
>>338845319
Wouldn't they have needed to make a shit ton of models for that one complete model?
>>338847108
We don't know. It's likely he will still build a large military in case of potential warmongering from other Civs.
>>338848010
literally an interactive movie
>>338840470
he become pretty fat in his later years
he also become an even more bigger warmonger then in his youth
literally pushed for america fighting in ww1 since day one only to see his own son die during it. after that he was more or less insane
>>338848010
Wow, this is worse than MGS4.
Now I understand why people who paid money for Uncharted games always come across so bitter and angry.
>>338847823
We have Sean Bean for 6 which is amazing, really really good choice.
>>338835615
>Based Teddy is the representative of America
YES
E
S
>those graphics
Fucking why
http://m.ign.com/articles/2016/05/25/civilization-6s-new-game-changer-features
>>338848010
great mix of gameplay and story
I think I´m gonna replay it this weekend after finishing 4
stay made pc cucks
>>338848202
>also available on Xbox One™, PlayStation 4™ and iOS™!
>>338848294
sonyggers are truly deluded
>>338846459
>>338847108
>>338848018
>As mentioned in our last Civ 6 preview, one of the things that will be revealed is a leader’s hidden motive: a randomized goal or preference that will influence an AI’s behavior in addition to their consistent “historical” motive based on their real-world personality. For instance, I first encountered America’s President Teddy Roosevelt, whose Big Stick motive makes him act aggressively toward anyone who bullies city-states on his continent. This system of knowing part of the picture but not all of it definitely made this leader seem unpredictable – I’m not sure why he declared war on me, for instance, because I didn't have that level of access. Naturally I’ll need to play a lot more before I can tell if that makes their actions seem more or less logical.
>Illustrating that systems are still in flux, Beach hinted that Firaxis is considering making the AI’s motivations even more mysterious by adding a second hidden trait that will come into play in the mid-game. “We had a big pivot point in Civ 5 when you got to ideology. We’re looking at this the same way,” said Beach, adding that while the AI behavior might change, it wouldn’t be a totally new personality.
>>338848137
>Wow, this is worse than MGS4.
its really not.
I only played 1 and 2, but they didnt really have any more cutscenes than gears of war
>>338848150
Berncuck just leave, your autism is leaking. Trump is a modern mix of Teddy and Reagan.
>>338848150
How?
>>338848173
he will die too
>>338846198
Nixon would be awesome if we get him.
abe is fucking overrated, he didn't do shit for blacks or he didn't care as much as people like too remember.
He used them as a excuse for the war.
slaves were still a thing in the north, he didn't do shit about that.
>>338847924
>he was the Trump of his time.
I wish I had the power to hate people to death.
>>338848360
I wish the leaders themselves or spies could tell you exactly why they warred/denounced you- getting buttfucked for literally no reason in V was annoying as hell
>>338848115
unless that's out of his ass, there's no way he can shot that far, that thick, with that speed
>>338848240
The annoying thing about these articles is that they always seem to assume that 5 is the gold standard for the series
>>338847625
millions upon millions of lives > a bit of a technological advancement
>>338847924
>>338848150
>>338848541
Take this shit to /pol/ you retards
>>338848119
He fucking hated Wilson.
He only pushed ww1 because he couldn't stand what Germany done and wilson was a puss about it.
>>338848360
hope they fixed diplomacy atleast
>>338848506
It's the most relevant and it is pretty much THE Civ game to play so of course people compare it directly. Sure you can go and play Civ1 to look cool and edgy but at certain point of your life you realize there are more important things to achieve than looking hip on the internet.
>>338848592
>people that were poor fuckers that did nothing good died for a higher cause
>waaah b-but beople D:
>>338848684
It is said that diplomacy in the early-game will be tribal-like and as the game progresses, it will become more complex
>>338848506
Civ V with expansion packs is the gold standard though. :^)
>>338845890
Uncharted 2 was one of the most boring and generic games I've ever played.
>>338847625
wow, a European country industrializing in the 20th century, such a hard accomplishment
We got based teddy.
All we need is nixon and it would be perfect.
I can hear nixon's voice actor already.
>>338848829
>20th century
wut r u on about m8
>>338848684
It sounds like it will at least be easier to keep target civs happy as long as you don't conflict with their policies. Like if you don't make war, Teddy will be your bro, and if you have a huge military, Cleopatra will suck your nuts.
The hidden agendas will keep it from being completely predictable, though. Like if America gets Wonder Fever it won't matter as much if you're being a pacifist builder because you're sniping those Wonders Roosevelt wants.
>>338848625
>deleted
based fucking mods
>>338848592
>>338848829
bait? I too wouldn't want to live under Stalin's rule if I was conquered, but at least I don't doubt the immense influence he had on the Soviet Union and therefore the whole world. Hating on him is fine, natural even, denying his influence is nationalistic delusion (in all likelihood American).
I liked the Civ V old guy.
>no global happiness
SAVED
>>338849040
That's actually pretty based desu.
>>338848592
>>338848829
>american propaganda from the 80s is still in effect
jesus christ
>>338847983
please dont forget.
>>338846593
>
>
>
>>338848506
>>338848729
As for Firaxis themselves, they already consider IV to be the platinum standard for the old "fat cross and stacks" game started in Civilization, and are trying to develop along a new line starting with V. Because if you want the old style you can just play IV.
>>338847939
>Boromir
Nice meme, Ned Stark is doing the voice overs
>we get Bismarck again
>>338849270
I thought it was 006.
>>338835615
this shit looks like armello
>>338849206
watch his standup comedy, it's pretty solid and comfy
>>338849272
Why are Trumpfags so obnoxious?
>>338835615
The graphical style and menus really kills it for me. Absolutely detest the cartoony graphics. If I'm going to be looking at horrible models for 2000 hours I'd prefer them to look tolerable, so I'm not really interested.
My memory is fuzzy.
Did Civ V had Steamworkshop in day one?
>>338839136
And Google Maps / OSM style map tiles come Modern/Atomic/Future era.
Will we get this guy?
>>338848957
Did you actually think Nixon would have any chance? All that the average Civ player knows about this guy is Watergate
So the "confirmed" civs/leaders are:
>America - Teddy Roosevelt
>China - Qin Shi Huang
>Egypt - Cleopatra
>India - Gandhi
>Japan
anybody else technically known to be in the game?
>>338849310
Makes sense to me. Who else in on par with Bismarck as a visionary leader?
>>338843051
Not me. I fucking hated when the Pyro movie was that stupid AS bullshit. DURR HURR HURR HE CATCHES PEOPLE ON FIRE BUT THINKS IT'S ALL SUNSHINE AND RAINBOWS! THIS CONTRAST IS THE GREATEST!
>Uses the footage given to him instead of using his own
What the fuck are you doing.
>>338847427
They're only sorta bringing back stacked units. You can have a regular unit and a "support" stacked, and you can combine identical units to create stronger ones.
It's a good compromise.
>>338849364
that's bait
>>338849456
You can discuss about him in /pol/, this is a thread for Civ 6.
>>338845890
Man, this place is so full of fucking children.
>>338849535
He said right there that there was stuff in the demo that 2K/Firaxis wasn't ready to show off yet
>>338849439
Germany will defiantly be in the game and Russia.
>>338849373
Yeah it looks really bad. I thought I was being a bit hasty judging it by the first screenshots but seeing it in action I still hate it. The leaderscreens look worse than the last game especially with the totally static background. It's really disappointing.
>>338849550
>You can have a regular unit and a "support" stacked
this is how it worked in 5
>you can combine identical units to create stronger ones
will they actually combine or just level up the other unit?
>>338849643
We know they'll be in but have they been specifically mentioned yet?
>>338849643
The civs that have been in every game from the start:
America
Aztecs
China
Egypt
England
France
Germany
Greece
India
Japan (SNES Civ 1 came out the same year as the MSDOS Civ 1)
Rome
Russia
Persia's also been in since 2.
>>338849771
But no, I don't believe anyone else has been explicitly confirmed yet.
>Civilization VI introduces leader agendas, and Cleopatra's is "Queen of the Nile," which states that she likes powerful militaries and will try to ally with them. Firaxis pulled this detail from her actual life; she aligned herself with powerful men like Julius Caesar and Mark Anthony, seducing them so Egypt wouldn't get attacked. She also has another randomly assigned hidden agenda that I'll need to discover through trade routes or by sending a delegation.
Cleopatra better look really beautiful thenfor muh SFM porn
>>338835615
Leaked in game model of Napoleon, fits the artstyle perfectly.
>>338849738
No, I mean support as in Artillery or Crossbowmen or something. And yes, they create one larger unit, not leveling it up.
>Builders / workers are now Beyond Earth's explorers, they have charges
>>338835615
I don't know why wonders need to take up a single tile. A tile would be a large portion of land in real life terms and not all these wonders would take up that much space such as Big Ben which is part of another structure that being the parliament building in London. There would only be a small group of wonders that would require this i.e the great pyramids
>>338845319
So, how would that work for mod wonders?
The is one word
Required in a post that has a
Unique effect causing the
Message to get deleted by the
Police of this image board
Why do they hate possible dlc and modding?
>>338850159
poorly
>>338850138
It's stressing opportunity costs, so you don't whore every single wonder
>>338844982
It's released in 5 months, so there's no way they're gonna do a complete overhaul of the look. The mechanics will be the only thing that will be worked on between now and its release.
>>338845319
Glad they brought the wonder animations back. Hopefully they've brought back the FMVs for victory conditions instead of the shitty splash screens.
Is this for Android too or just iOS? Most games I find interesting on mobile are exclusive to iOS or hit their stores for months first before Android get them.
>>338849382
no, it had its own built in mod searching thing. there's still an achievement in the game that's bugged for rating a mod, since that thing doesn't work anymore.
>>338849738
Civ 5 can only stack air, ground, special and civilian units
In civ 6 you can also stack 2 ground units and I presume 2 air units too.
>>338850341
i hope I can turn it off.
>>338850285
This, it's also neater visually instead of having a tiny little model in your city.
> VI (Six!)
I really hope they added Spain.
>>338850285
>Can't wonder whore and completely dominate the game
Dropped desu senpai
>teddy model is a big fat caricature
if they make the female models godawful looking i'm not even going to bother playing
>>338849439
Where did you get Gandhi from? It's a safe bet but I haven't seen him confirmed
>>338850519
MOORS BE PURGED
>>338850641
They mention Ghandi every two interviews, anon
>>338850641
they mentioned gandhi specifically in the initial game reveal article
Still looks shit in motion.
They could fix it before release but probably will keep it. Especially since various editors from magazines already made comments about how the new graphics style looks "pretty" or "clear, in late game everything was soooo full of details, now it looks clear and better".
Fucking casuals.
Fucking mobile games.
>>338849856
Japan only had a very very brief empire that only lasted a few year during WW2. Why are they even on the list. They're not that influential.I hope they still have that combat bonus where they fight at full strength when wounded cause it fun as fuck.
>>338850519
Spain was shit, if they didn't get first natural wonder then they might as well be a generic civ, their UU are just small upgrades, not strong late, have a roll of the dice chance of getting first natural wonder, if they don't get that then they're delayed mid game for them to enjoy their UU's
>>338850761
It was a problem for me at the first reveal but I honestly don't care anymore. I'm more interested in the new gameplay mechanics.
>>338850598
As long as they make a good model of a certian leader standing infront of a giant wall in Texas as dlc in celebration of a successful campaign later this year I will forgive the way Teddy looks.
>>338850761
Not for nothing, But why is graphic so important in a strategy game? Look at dorf fortress
>>338850598
>not wanting big fat tiddies
wow
almost all leaders throughout the series have been caricatures, by the way
>>338850285
But it makes no sense on a realistic scale which is what these games strive to portray. If they made certain large wonders do this that would make sense. Even limiting the distance these large wonders can be built would be okay. But to do this for every wonder doesn't.
>>338850893
I know that gameplay mechanics is the most important but I would still want to be able to play without wanting to puke.
>>338850761
Yeah I really don't get how people say the old civs look cluttered and hard to see.
>>338850930
fuck off asshole we're discussing vidya here
>>338850893
agreed, if the gameplay is truly superior to V i can forgive the mobile tier grafix
>>338850945
yeah but not so cartoony, with exaggerated proportions etc
>>338835615
>teddy
Sold
>>338835615
>Teddy Roosevelt at last
>>338850761
>I need something to shitpost about
The game looks fine faggot.
>>338850935
>Dorf
>Depth out the ass
>Civ depth but not enough for shit tier graphics
>>338850945
Now I wish they animate the world leader like it a political cartoon
>>338835615
why would i pay 60 fucking euros when i can just play Civ 5?
>>338851029
bullshit
>>338837270
King Richard's Crusade is perfect. I love the choice of Gluck to go along the art.
>>338851078
>Says the person shitposting
>>338851029
>getting upset at game related posts
Wanting dlc for fun customization is what civ is for retard
>>338851269
N O G L O B A L H A P P I N E S S
>>338850935
In DF you work with imagination. Besides, call me casual if you want, but I want the graphics in game to be fitting and clear. Especially when I play 4x, I want to see growing nation and pretty terrain. In older Civ titles it worked, imagination filling what graphics couldnt. Now instead I see ugly, mobile-tier cartoon bullshit that ruins whole effect.
>>338838274
The new leaderscreens seem to be a regression from V's. Not just because they're caricatures, but also because they seem to have changed it to "leader in front of painting" versus the previous "leader in room" thing they did before. Reminds me a bit too much of Beyond Earth than V's style.
>>338851269
You can't play as the TRUMP of the early 1900's in Civ 5.
So they took districts from Endless Legend now?
Hey, I was playing Civ with some friends of mine, and it was pretty fucking fun.
But my friend eventually won on some random turn at like 1914 after I killed our other friend and it was only me and him. He won a cultural victory and I don't get it.
I think that the cultural victory in Brave New World is probably a lot better than the base game, but it seems like it's buried under a bunch of fucking hard to interpret menus and shit. I wish there was more of an on screen indicator of culture "taking you over" or whatever.
When you conquer someone's city, it's obvious. When a civ has "influence" over yours, it's buried in a menu. Someone explain?
>>338851406
The map and UI pretty clear for me. More so then V at least.
None of you people gonna complain you you play this on the phone on the shitty anyway.
>>338851523
yea
>>338851530
It warns you through notifications when it's taking over, and you can always check the tourism tab (which you should be doing from Industrial era onwards)
You should have noticed the massive crushing happiness as well
>>338851523
It's a good system
>>338851530
It's a single button click to see how influential a culture is vs yours. It even places a notification when someone becomes influential over another culture on the sidebar.
>>338835884
i wish, civworld was a pretty gud game
>>338851523
Amplitude now sets standards for 4x genre. Arent you happy?
>>338851635
V was both clear AND full of details. This time, it looks like cartoon show instead of virtual story of building civilization to stand the test of time.
>>338851825
Detail that gets to be a total clusterfuck one you get to turn 950.
>>338851825
>>338851715
I'm not complaining. More customization and option is always good.
>>338840067
V's leaderheads looked better. A shitty looking painting as a setting? Really m8?
>>338836784
They won't it's threaded.
>>338835615
>still has all the stuff from Civ V expansions like religion, espionage, trade routes, and tourism
>eureka
>districts
>civics
>no global happiness
>have to build city defenses, rather than getting it for free
>workers/builders are actually useful, and not idle-bait
>new (hopefully not shit) engine
It seems like they actually BUILT on the previous entry this time, rather than cutting out features for future expansions. My god, they're learning. We might finally get a Civ that's actually good at release. Personally I'm hyped.
The only potential downsides are 1UPT, the almost certainly broken AI, and maybe the graphics/UI.
>>338850789
I think you need to read some history books.
>>338852057
pretty sure it's a placeholder.
>>338836229
>running the game at 120 fps on a turn-based strategy game.
I but you complained when the VN you play run at 20 fps too.
Looks better than expected to be honest.
Will probably take an expansion or two to perfect but as long as they don't screw it up like they have Beyond Earth it can be a solid game.
>>338851530
Sounds like you're a typical retard who shouldn't be playing Civ.
You should be checking every menu and infographic almost every turn, as well as all your cities.
>>338852242
Wishful thinking
>>338852151
It's not pure 1upt its a hybrid. For me the biggest letdown really is the land graphics, sea is fine rivers look like ass, ground looks terrible tress look terrible.
>>338851530
Just set it to domination only victory next time
>>338850159
Who cares modded wonders are literally never good.
>>338852382
maybe it IS the case though. The game still have months of developpement.
>4 charges on builders
Well pillaging just became strong as fuck in the game.
>Can't manually build roads, they are done by trading
So now I can't make roads to support my troops at war? Seems like a bad change.
>>338852404
Rivers really do look like utter ass. I hope the plain gray colour is a placeholder at least.
>>338852520
supposedly pillaging takes multiple turns as well
>>338846573
>Éamon de Valera
Sweet Jesus we better get our own civ this time. I'm sick of that literally who Celt girl.
>>338852503
It lines up with the rest of the aesthetic, not to mention it fits Teddy's positioning on screen/animation. It's a reflection of how they did the leaders in Beyond Earth only instead of a gameplay background they've inserted a painting. I doubt it will change.
>>338835615
>Barrack and City can now bombard.
neat
>>338841936
>Gaben is a libertarian, and anti-corporation, etc.
Anyone know when we will get more info on the other leaders?
>>338852717
The Celts don't really deserve a civ, let alone Ireland lmao. They would only ever add the Irish as a total curveball.
New interview
>Civ 6 Interview discussing canal cities, graphics, happiness, and more!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YBdl8YVFK4o
>>338852990
>I gave some really tough challenges to our art team
No shit
>>338852520
Yeah the road change sounds really bad.
>>338852893
>The Celts don't really deserve a civ
Agreed. They were never a unified country.
>They would only ever add the Irish as a total curveball
We're the only real replacements for the Celts if they can them. And we deserve it way more than some no-name native American tribe.
>>338852990
>TSL stuff
>people bemoan that there isn't enough South American civs
I guess we're getting less Europeans and more Africans/Americans then
kinda gives me Civ III feel, visually at least.
mechanically I'd be wary after BE a lot.
>>338835615
could this cunt have anymore of an annoying fucking voice holy SHIT SHUT THE FUCK UP
>>338853780
Not everyone can have a silky smooth voice like President Donald T. You''l just have to deal with it.
>>338853590
>We're the only real replacements for the Celts if they can them
No, the Gauls would be the natural replacement of 'the Celts'. I will give you that a Gaelic civ could work as well.
>wonders are just a video of it being build
its cool and all, but I still like the painting and quote in Civ 5
>>338853590
>What If... Civs shouldn't exist
Do you not know what fun is?
>>338853896
nobody improve the tiles like i do
Fuck he took down the pure B-reel video
>>338853590
>And we deserve it way more than some no-name native American tribe.
lol, nah, not really
>>338853989
who said there won't be quote?
>Barbarians have scouts
>If a barb scout finds your city and gets back to an encampment they'll spawn an "invasion force"
lord help
>>338853759
BE was (allegedly) done by a completely different team than Civ6 which is being made by the guys who did the Civ5 expansions, and unlike BE it looks like this game won't be barebones as fuck at launch since it's going to have all the major features that were introduced in the Civ5 expansions i.e. religion, tourism etc. on top of all the new stuff they're introducing
>>338852990
>>338853610
>South American civs
Brazil
Inca Empire
and that's it pretty much. I guess they could add Argentina, or Uruguay?
>>338835615
Where is the art for the buildings?
One of the most boring things about Beyond Earth were the bland wonders and building art, made it look like a spreadsheet.
Put a bit more effort in the art, it's supposed ot be about the great wonders of the world.
>>338854489
>Uruguay
no u
>>338854414
that's great and all
but that doesn't change my buyers remorse for buying that pile of steaming shit
>>338854406
>not brutally slaughtering any and all Barbarian fucking shits that dare step into your civ
It's like you want to lose.
>hey folks ASDGSHGFHJSD here
>>338854725
You were warned.
Beside, the same year, Age of Wonders 3, Endless Legend, and Distant World: Universe were released.
>China can use builders to rush Wonders
>>338854537
Maybe the art was replaced with the tile-wasting wonder building itself. Makes it much harder to just ignore later in the game when the wonders get surrounded by all the other shit your cities have to build, or whatever pops up as the population increases.
>>338854489
They pretty much have to scrap the bottom of the barrel for south american civs, unless they go full retard and add "new spain" as a south american civ lead by Cortez
>>338854489
Brazil Empire is a nice addtion. I liked Pedro II in Civ V and their tourism focus is pretty fun with the art pieces system.
>>338852990
What a pointless interview. The only interesting questions he asked couldn't even be answered.
Biggest question: Will we see the return of the happy merchant?
>>338855149
That would piss so many people off it'd be hilarious.
>>338854946
I'm fine with Wonders taking tiles, but I don't like just going through balnd menus while doing stuff in Civ.
Civ V's icons and more "Artsy" wonders and effects when you completed something was always fun and you got the narrator reading a famous quote.
I dunno, just made the whole game more fun when you were rewarded with a bug fanfare when you completed a new wonder or a new age. BE was just so sterile with none of the grandiose aspect of Civivlization.
>>338854489
The Tupinamba or Gran Columbia also have a shot of making it in, possibly the Venezuelans under Bolivar.
>>338848015
They can do most of those changes with textures only
>>338854406
I wonder if they can actually potentially raze your cities if you're not careful. Would be slightly worrying, but I'd also be far more motivated to start building defenses early if barbarians become more than a minor nuisance who try to nab unprotected settlers.
>>338835615
fuck it actually looks good
>>338854489
It'll be Gran Colombia.
Source: I am Ed Beach.
>>338856000
Shit.. I guess we were wrong, bros.
Looks like i'm a #civdog now.
>>338835615
My boy Teddy!
>>338855189
I found Brazil pretty frustrating to play
>all those wonders that need building and not a hammer to be found
>>338855782
After a while, though, all those popups with quotes and shit become annoying. You hear the same ones every time and see the same art every single time. I stopped letting the quotes even play out after hearing them all at least twice. I would much rather the quotes be an optional thing you can click on to hear, instead of being forced to hear it every time. Same with art popups.
Will they EVER fix naval AI? That shit has been horrible since Civ 1. Every single game has been "start on island = don't worry about ever getting invaded ever"
>>338845460
Hitler obviously
>>338856390
Well the tile and building changes to Civ VI make starting on a small island a pretty terrible idea.
>>338835615
Not bad, I hope it comes with denuvo I don't want to pay for stuff every poor shit can have for free
>>338856506
Yes, but will the AI ever be able to mount a proper invasion + naval support?
>>338856646
But will you ever be able to build fucking anything ever?
>>338856635
Denuvo stops mods and they have said they want really strong modding support.
>>338856334
Meh, I think this is more of a matter of taste. I have over 200 hours of Civ V and they never got downright annoying, and it's not like the skip button is hard to find. It's a fresh relief to get them lat-game, when you are pretty much just going through the motions until the next UN meeting.
>>338856706
>what is steam workshop
>>338856805
Still stops those steam workshop is just essentially a filesharing site.
>>338856761
Get upwards of 500 hours or more hearing the same quotes and seeing the same popups every game and tell me that it doesn't become annoying.
>>338841037
>Appeal: Breathtaking (7)
What does it mean?
>>338837270
Classical Elvis will never cease to make me smile.
>>338857003
Tourism stuff apparently.
>>338857003
Happiness of a city is based on its surroundings.
>>338845460
Donald Trump
Hitler
Stalin
Lenin
Mao Zedong
>>338856679
Uhhh, you miss my point. There are bigger issues here than can be fixed by DURRR YOU DON'T WANT TO START ON AN ISLAND ANYWAY.
What if you take over a whole continent, and the other AIs take over other continents?
What if you start on a big island?
What if you want to have control of the sea, and stop all AIs from landing ever?
All three are easy-mode unless they fix the naval AI.
>HEYA FOLKS
>>338857003
Looks like it ties into Tourism, so if you want a cultural victory you'll need to consider building resort cities that look good rather than purely their potential science/production output.
>>338857003
Tourism and special requirements to build specific wonders.
>>338835615
I gifted it to a bro. Will he hate me knowing he's forced to play this mobile piece of shit game?
>>338842373
>Civilization VI introduces leader agendas, and Cleopatra's is "Queen of the Nile," which states that she likes powerful militaries and will try to ally with them.
Slut.
>in the middle of a CiV game
>see these videos
>wanna play VI now
Is... is this what hype and e-excitement feels like..? Am I excited for a v-videogame?
>>338857692
yes
>>338835615
>We have a city nearby. Would you like to visit? I could show you the stuffed bears that are now so popular
Pls let every leader have this kind of sentences which reference to the leader himself
>>338857623
>slut shaming a women who likes men with big sticks
Found the liberal. Cleo is about to be my sub in every game.
>>338857692
I know how you feel. I was really sceptical after seeing the first screenshots but after seeing the gameplay I'm pretty optimistic.
The art style really isn't so bad either, I would have preferred if they'd stuck with V's but it's growing on me.
>>338835615
Blech, Civ II-III's shoddy civics=tech system is back. I never liked that aspect of those games, but I suppose it's better than V's system where you never had enough points to be creative.
>>338835615
mobile port when?
>>338857945
>The art style really isn't so bad either, I would have preferred if they'd stuck with V's but it's growing on me.
It's actually exactly what I tought about Civ V when I first played it.
And now, it's doing the same thing again.
I think it's just because how much you play this game, the artstyle grow into you.
>>338858013
>mobile
>game
lmao
>>338857948
Uh, no? What made you think that? This is unlike any system that has been before, but if anything it's closest to IV's system, which was also the best.
>>338841037
>Continent: Lemuria
Are we allowed to name geography parts? that would be nice
>>338835615
Was skeptical about the art style but I'm digging the fuck out of it now
>>338841037
It'd be neat if the font updated with your era, the text at the top left looks awfully medival.
>>338858140
>>mobile
>>game
>lmao
I don't see why not, it's going to match with the mobile playerbase pretty well.
>>338858432
every tile is named I think judging from video
>>338858791
>mobile playerbase
>game
>>338858691
Still confused why they're using this box art when the game itself has a totally different tone to it.
>listen to the video
>hear about strategic view button
>he doesn't actually show how it looks like
WELL FUCK YOU TOO
>>338859027
You clearly didn't listen to the video then.
>>338858913
Candy crush and Subway surfers are video games anon.
>>338859027
it's 3 minute b-reel that dude talking over for hour
>>338859027
He didn't make the video, it's stuff Firaxis sent him that they said he could use, he just narrated over it.
>>338859027
It's not his video, 4k didn't let him record his footage and gave him premade shit.
>>338836581
he's also effeminate
>>338859020
Eh thematically it still fits though
I can't believe they ask 60 bucks for it
>>338859241
>>338859204
>>338859191
Oh.
Fuck firaxis then.
>>338838180
Nigga still depressed and contemplating murdering his wife?
>>338859172
>Candy crush and Subway surfers are video games anon.
comedy gold
https://www.overthinkingit.com/2013/09/05/candy-crush/
>>338835615
Wow that looks bad.
Good thing Total War Warhammer is gonna occupy my time instead.
>>338859341
That's my only major problem with it right now. £50 is way too much for a PC game.
>>338859341
It's a big game
>>338835615
I'm taking back what I said earlier when it was announced
This might not be bad considering they're doing the Civ Rev system of merging up to 3 units into one army/legion/whatever they call it.
The biggest flaw it could potentially have is the AI. If the AI still manages to fuck up traveling long distances and putting its siege weaponry and archers in dumb places, this will be as bad as Civ5.
>>338859368
>Fuck firaxis
edgy
>>338859489
That's because plenty of retards will pay it
>what do you mean it's a rip off what are you poor
Does good old Sid even do anything with the Civ games anymore?
>>338859489
>>338859627
>stop buying games!
>you should buy those ones instead!
Thread is autosaging, here's a new one
>>338859950
>>338854414
Civ 6 was done by the guys that fixed civ V, Civ V and BE probably the same.
>>338846860
Eh, I suppose it makes sense that the majority of America's UUs are aircraft considering that it's sort of the cornerstone of their military accomplishments/something they literally invented from scratch, but it's too bad games never last long enough to use any of them: at least Minute Men were guaranteed to show up.
>>338860003
>autosaging
It's called a bump limit you innocent child
>>338846129
have you ever considered that maybe if you made your point clearly from the start you wouldn't sound like a moron
>>338860061
It's still autosaging, same thing.
>>338859434
>if a game doesn't have a story or has RNG to make the player spend money to advance it is not called a video game
Yes you are right, this IS comedy gold.
>>338846956
>Half the UUs are probably gonna be cavalry like in V
>>338860136
That's what I said?
no
Even the shittiest of the shittiest of the civilization game would be an elder god tier cult classic on mobile, consider the standard here.
>>338860114
bump limit!
>>338845373
>Civ5 fags
Go play 4. Multiple leaders per civilization, with different bonuses.
I know it'll explode your simple head
