[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
When did everyone become an expert on "design" ?
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /v/ - Video Games

Thread replies: 23
Thread images: 8
File: image.jpg (42 KB, 491x640) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
42 KB, 491x640
When did everyone become an expert on "design" ?
>>
Why did you not become one huh faggot?
>>
File: Based.jpg (82 KB, 640x397) Image search: [Google]
Based.jpg
82 KB, 640x397
>>338404613

For me it was right after I graduated.
>>
>>338404871
This is an "ironic" post right
>>
>>338404613
It doesn't take a degree to know if something works or not. It's like you don't have to be a pro artist to criticize a painting.
>>
>>338404994

No?
>>
File: 1463583723554.jpg (208 KB, 534x703) Image search: [Google]
1463583723554.jpg
208 KB, 534x703
>>338404871
That shit is more like an anti-credential.

>>338405105
>It's like you don't have to be a pro artist to criticize a painting.
Not a professional, but you need to understand art (I.E. be an artist) in order to have an opinion worth a shit. Its the same with vidya but nobody likes to admit to this so they can pretend their own opinion is worth anything (it isn't).
>>
>>338404613
Most people who talk about design aren't experts on design. You can become an expert on design through personal work in the field or through extensive study. Most people have not done either.
>>
File: image.jpg (55 KB, 512x288) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
55 KB, 512x288
>>338405203
Oh man
>>
There is honestly nothing more annoying than people with serious mental issues speaking on any kind of topic with self-imposed authority.
>>
>>338405618
At least they usually communicate via wall of text so it's easy to spot and ignore
>>
>>338405105
>It's like you don't have to be a pro artist to criticize a painting.
yeah you need art history education to criticize art on anything beyond "subjective opinion"

and funny how we have a bunch of critics already when there is barely any agreement on how to study video games as a new medium to begin with
>>
>>338404613
After Mr Plinkett became popular, all the AVGN ripoffs turned into "serious analysis" videos and now everyone thinks they're the smartest.
>>
>>338405337
An opinion carries more weight if you can explain it properly and give reasons, but even a complete layperson can have an opinion worth considering. If a group of pros come together and say something looks great but a bunch of normal people say it's ugly, there might be something else to consider.
>>
File: image.jpg (87 KB, 600x800) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
87 KB, 600x800
>you tube video by a teenager about bad game design
>>
File: sak.png (114 KB, 300x225) Image search: [Google]
sak.png
114 KB, 300x225
>>338406124
>youtube video about game design
>person behind video has never made a game
>not even one in gamemaker/unity
>>
File: image.jpg (119 KB, 500x539) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
119 KB, 500x539
>>338405872
Yeah the fact that most people are retarded
>>
>there are people who make a living by spending their lives consuming media and then complaining about it
>>
>>338404871
pff, I didn't go to video game school, I went to video games.
>>
File: image.png (374 KB, 639x474) Image search: [Google]
image.png
374 KB, 639x474
>>338404871
How much did this cost you ?
>>
>>338404613
apple, google, gnome, etc. started releasing human interface guidelines a few years ago, which are documents you can read and feel like a UI expert afterwords
>>
>>338405872
>even a complete layperson can have an opinion worth considering
For others retards like him, sure.
>>
>>338404613
>When did everyone become an expert on "design" ?
I would only be mad about this if "professional" designers didn't routinely put out bad designs
Thread replies: 23
Thread images: 8

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.