>$69
When was the last time EA sold $49.99 games?
2007?
Are you an Aussie m8?
>>338311319
If it's anything like the other Battlefield games it's worth at least $80
>no royalty fees to the platform holder
>still have to pay the same as console users
holy shit, explain this pcfags
>>338311479
Nope, now I'm thinking how much would aussies pay for this.
>>338311792
>undercut retailers on your own platform
>retailers refuse to stock your product in stores
Simple
>>338312027
What? GOG did that with TW3 and no retailer got upset over it. Can that fallicious b-b-but muh retailers get angry meme end?
>>338311319
>When was the last time EA sold $49.99 games?
are you from 2005?
the $50 argument is dead, anon
we $60 now
When was the last time any developer at all consistently sold their AAA games for $50? These days anything below $60 is the exception for a vidya that is lacking content like the recent Ratchet and Clank. The most recent AAA game that developer released prior to the new RaC was sunset overdrive at $60.
>>338311739
Don't forget to buy the season pass ;^)
>>338312508
Really sucks because microtransactions are already confirmed.
BF1 Premium?
>>338313628
Switch over to the standard edition, familia
>>338313721
My bad. EA had that to default.
>>338313872
Well at least the deluxe is now 1:1, AUD:USD
>>338313872
Is that USD or AUD?
No game is worth more than 50 dollars
>>338314145
Aren't kangaroo bucks basically worthless though
>>338314580
I'm pretty sure MGSV was worth 60 if it had the same feel as its trailers.
op is a fag
